Downloaded 54 times
![Challenge 2: how to achieve 10x capacity
in the next 10 years?
[Courtesy of David J. Richardson, adapted from “Filling the Light Pipe”, Science 15 October 2010]
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Cisco Confidential](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ip-opticalcollabforacp13plenary-131222025813-phpapp02/85/Plenary-talk-by-Ori-Gerstel-at-ACP13-on-IP-optical-collaboration-4-320.jpg)
![Quantifying the savings
[To be published in IEEE Comm. Mag., 1-2/2014]
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Cisco Confidential](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ip-opticalcollabforacp13plenary-131222025813-phpapp02/85/Plenary-talk-by-Ori-Gerstel-at-ACP13-on-IP-optical-collaboration-32-320.jpg)
Uploaded byOri Gerstel
Plenary talk by Ori Gerstel at ACP13 on IP-optical collaboration
The document discusses challenges in multi-layer networking, particularly the limited growth in telecom revenues, increasing fiber capacity demands, and rising costs of DWDM optics. It proposes solutions like agile and elastic optical networking, multi-layer coordination, and optimization through SDN. The future vision emphasizes collaboration between IP and optical layers, utilizing both distributed and centralized control for enhanced flexibility and efficiency.
More Related Content
Similar to Plenary talk by Ori Gerstel at ACP13 on IP-optical collaboration
![[Cisco Connect 2018 - Vietnam] Cisco connect 2018 sanjay - cisco sda v1.0-h...](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/ciscoconnect2018-sanjay-ciscosdav1-180504035424-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
![[Cisco Connect 2018 - Vietnam] Yedu s. introducing cisco dna assurance](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/yedus-180504035325-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
![5G Explained! A High Level Overview [Introduction]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/5gexplainedahighleveloverview-260119165306-cc137a3e-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
Plenary talk by Ori Gerstel at ACP13 on IP-optical collaboration
- 1. The Age ofMulti-Layer Networking Ori Gerstel, Principal Engineer ogerstel@cisco.com © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 2. Outline Challenges • Theshrinking gap between network cost and revenues • Are we approaching the limit of fiber capacity? • Cost of DWDM optics not dropping fast enough • The reducing accuracy of traffic forecasts Solution components • Agile and elastic optical networking • Multi layer coordination (control plane) • Multi layer optimization (SDN) Summary © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 3. Challenge 1: NetworkOperator ROI Telecom Revenue growth is limited (GDP based) $2,500 (30-100% CAGR) 60 Wireless Fixed line $1,500 Exabytes per month $ Billions $2,000 Internet traffic growth is high $1,000 $500 30 Mobility Business Internet Business IP WAN Consumer Internet Consumer IPTV/CATV $- 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Independent Analyst Research and Cisco Analysis; Cisco Visual Networking Index © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 4. Challenge 2: howto achieve 10x capacity in the next 10 years? [Courtesy of David J. Richardson, adapted from “Filling the Light Pipe”, Science 15 October 2010] © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 5. Challenge 3: Thecost of DWDM optics does not drop fast enough © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 6. Can SDM help? Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Parallelsystems help challenge 2 but not challenge 3 © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 7. Can SDM help? Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Multi-corefibers + amplifiers + ROADMs will help © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 8. Can SDM help? Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Tx Tx Tx Tx Rx Rx Rx Rx Butmost of the power/cost is in Tx/Rx anyway… Can they be integrated sufficiently to change the equation? © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 9. Cisco Confidential Shannon Moore © 2006Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Parallelism Insufficient integration A note on Challenge 2 & Challenge 3
- 10. Challenge 4: Growingforecast uncertainty Interactions between SPs and content providers are becoming more complex and change more often The textbook Internet (1995-2007) Source : ATLAS Internet Observatory 2009 Annual Report © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential The new Internet (2009 --)
- 11. Challenge 4: Growingforecast uncertainty Mega became a Carpathia Hosting Customer Carpathia Hosting > 0.5% of total Internet Traffic Graph source : ATLAS Internet Observatory 2009 Annual Report Reasons: • New content (who anticipated that Netflix will be 30% of the peak traffic?) • Changes in hosting arrangements • Changes in peering / transit set-up in the wider Internet • Failures in the wider Internet – changes entry points into SP network • Data Center workload shift internal / external to the Service Provider © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 12. A note onChallenge 4 Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. Niels Bohr © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 13. Outline Intro toSP core networks Challenges • The shrinking gap between network cost and revenues • Are we approaching the limit of fiber capacity? • Cost of DWDM optics not dropping fast enough • The reducing accuracy of traffic forecasts Solution components • Agile and elastic optical networking • Multi layer coordination (control plane) • Multi layer optimization (SDN) Summary © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 14. Agile optical networking (a)non-agile solution: 7 wavelengths =Sum(Max{Ai,Bi}) Scenario I: 100 100 300 Scenario II: 200 200 100 © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential Required bandwidth Unused wavelength Used wavelength (b) agile solution: 5 wavelengths =Max{Sum(Ai),Sum(Bi)}
- 15. Elastic Optical Networks Flexibleuse of Spectrum 50GHz slice 40G Fixed Grid Rigid 50GHz slice 100G 4x50GHz slices Elastic 400G 40G 25GHz slice Flex Spectrum 100GHz slice 400G © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 50GHz 200GHz Future 25GHz Cisco Confidential
- 16. Elastic Optical Networks AdaptiveReach 100G Fixed Grid 1000 Km 3000 Km 100G Current approach: the only way to extend the reach is to add regens Regens much higher CAPEX & OPEX What if only 30G are needed for the client layer? Not only is the channel going to be under-utilized, it is also going to be unnecessarily regenerated… © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 17. Elastic Optical Networks AdaptiveReach Rigid 100G Fixed Grid 1000 Km 3000 Km Elastic 100G 30G 3000 Km sending less data Flex Spectrum 3000 Km using more spectrum 100G © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 50GHz 200GHz Future 25GHz Cisco Confidential
- 18. What this meansto the IP layer? In the past, routers focused on features, services etc. Instead of managing capacity growth carefully, it was added liberally to avoid complex management Optical capacity was considered nearly unlimited Since the optical layer is becoming the expensive and limited resource, the main optimization goal of the router may become to optimally use optical resources © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 19. What this meansto the IP layer? Implications • The router must drive the requirements for optical connections • The optical layer will “right size” the link to the router needs • The router must be aware of the cost of the bandwidth on each link • The IP layer must add/remove optical connections based on traffic needs • More extensive use of traffic engineering in the IP layer, including bandwidth constraints © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 20. IP-optical interaction: Use case1: “sunny day” scenario The routers know how much BW they need and what constraints they care about: e.g., latency, SRLGs The ON tries to satisfy the request at lowest cost, taking into account: TXPs used, regens used, spectrum used, distance, … It informs the router that the path has been established Give me 100G to 1 router B with these constraints… 2 Router A © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. OK, Here it is Router B Cisco Confidential
- 21. IP-optical interaction: Use case2 The ON cannot satisfy the request The ON informs the router and lets the router relax its constraints (higher latency, lower capacity,..) The router issues a new request, which hopefully can be satisfied Can’t do it. 2 Do you want to try something else? OK, inme 100G to Give this case, can 3 1 you give me this path router B with these with less constraints? constraints… Router A © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Router B Cisco Confidential
- 22. IP-optical interaction: Use case3 The ON can satisfy the request, but the cost is high (e.g., need regens) Should the ON inform the router and let the router relax its constraints? How does the ON know that there is a cheaper option? Or is this a blind search? 3 This is expensive. 2 Do you want to try something else? OK, in this case, can you give me this path with less constraints? Router A © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Router B Cisco Confidential
- 23. IP-optical interaction: Use case4: restoration The original path failed. ON informs the router and receives a new path request from the router The new request can have the same constraints as the old request Or it may have a relaxed set of constraints (even less capacity) Or it may be unconstrained Or the IP layer may choose not to restore the path 3 The path failed. 2 What do you want to do? Can you give me this path with same/less constraints? Router A © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Router B Cisco Confidential
- 24. Striking the rightbalance between distributed and centralized control © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 25. Striking the rightbalance between distributed and centralized control Distributed control sweet-spot Centralized control sweet-spot • Optimized for restoration • Optimized for network optimization • Localized changes • Global network changes • Good enough for customers with basic agility needs • Adds value for customers expecting advanced features • Highly survivable – even during large scale disasters • Less available – unless significant complexity is added • Harder to extend • Ease of extending the code A combination of both is needed for an optimal solution © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 26. Striking the balancebetween distributed and centralized intelligence – not our invention… Centralized control Distributed control © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 27. Hybrid solution: Centraldecision + distributed execution Central controller 1. Central controller learns optical network from (a) Optical layer, (b) Routed Layer 2 1b R1 R3 3 1a O3 O1 O2 © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 2. Central controller triggers creation of new link by provisioning the router with policies 3. GMPLS-UNI creates the optical circuit leveraging WSON
- 28. Basic multi-layer optimization The ability to hitlessly reroute optical paths helps both IP layer and optical layer Agile IP layer Static DWDM layer Agile DWDM layer © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential Improving the IP layer: • Reduce link latency • Improve link diversity Improving the optical layer: • Reduce path distance • Reduce regens • Reduce congestion
- 29. What can bere-optimized in the optical layer? Reduce stranded BW b a c Reduce congestion on opitcal link Remove regen R Reduce path length to improve latency, combat aging Redistribute spectrum (critical for FlexSpectrum) © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential d a b c d
- 30. How can theIP layer be reoptimized? Should the purple link be added to bypass router N3? Not simple to answer – it depends… On the end to end IP traffic On the routing metric assigned to the link On use of IP load balancing On share risks between the new link and existing ones On protection capacity elsewhere © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential This requires centralized ML SDN that know the entire network
- 31. Striking the rightbalance between distributed and centralized control Centralized SDN: Most other use cases © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential Distributed CP: Restoration
- 32. Quantifying the savings [Tobe published in IEEE Comm. Mag., 1-2/2014] © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 33. Outline Intro toSP core networks Challenges • The shrinking gap between network cost and revenues • Are we approaching the limit of fiber capacity? • Cost of DWDM optics not dropping fast enough • The reducing accuracy of traffic forecasts Solution components • Agile and elastic optical networking • Multi layer coordination (control plane) • Multi layer optimization (SDN) Summary © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 34. Summary In the past Inthe future Fixed optical layer design Agile and elastic optical layer Network flexibility achieved thru IP layer Both layers collaborate to achieve required flexibility Distributed control in IP layer Both distributed and central control for IP layer No optical control plane Both distributed and central control for optical layer Decoupled operation between layers Strong multi-layer networking via distributed and centralized control © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 35. The ideal convergednetwork of the future Network Manager Centralized Controller Control plane DWDM aware router Flex i/f Flex Tx/Rx Flexible ROADM © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 36. A final noteon IP-optical collaboration The whole is greater than the sum of its parts Aristotle © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
- 37. Thank You! ogerstel@cisco.com © 2006Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
Editor's Notes
- #5 65nm 28nm 22nm