The document discusses counting sort, a linear time sorting algorithm. Counting sort runs in O(n) time when the integers being sorted are in the range of 1 to k, where k is O(n). It works by counting the number of elements less than or equal to each unique input element, and using this to directly place each element in the correct position of the output array. Pseudocode and an example are provided to demonstrate how counting sort iterates through the input, counts the occurrences of each unique element, and uses this to sort the elements into the output array in linear time. However, counting sort has limitations and may not be practical for large datasets due to its required extra storage space.
The document discusses algorithms and big O notation. It defines an algorithm as a precise step-by-step procedure and notes that algorithms should be efficient, considering time and memory usage. Big O notation is introduced as a measure of how computation increases with input size. Examples are given of linear O(N) and constant O(1) time algorithms. Common sorting algorithms like bubble sort and selection sort are O(n2) while merge sort and binary search are more efficient at O(log n).
Parallel search or multithreaded search is a way to increase search speed by using additional processors.
Parallel search algorithms are classified by their scalability (that means the behavior of the algorithm as the number of processors becomes large) and their speed up.
This document discusses various algorithms for multi-armed bandit problems including k-armed bandits, action value methods like epsilon-greedy, tracking non-stationary problems, optimistic initial values, upper confidence bound action selection, gradient bandit algorithms, contextual bandits, and Thomson sampling. The k-armed bandit problem involves choosing actions to maximize reward over time without knowing the expected reward of each action. The document outlines methods for balancing exploration of unknown actions with exploitation of best known actions.
This document discusses insertion sort, including its mechanism, algorithm, runtime analysis, advantages, and disadvantages. Insertion sort works by iterating through an unsorted array and inserting each element into its sorted position by shifting other elements over. Its worst case runtime is O(n^2) when the array is reverse sorted, but it performs well on small, nearly sorted lists. While simple to implement, insertion sort is inefficient for large datasets compared to other algorithms.
The document provides an introduction to algorithms and their analysis. It discusses the definition of an algorithm, their characteristics, types and examples. It also covers the analysis of algorithms including best, average and worst case analysis. Common asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega and Theta notations are introduced to analyze the time complexity of algorithms. Examples of analyzing for loops and other control statements are provided.
The document discusses Big O notation, which is used to classify algorithms based on how their running time scales with input size. It provides examples of common Big O notations like O(1), O(log n), O(n), O(n^2), and O(n!). The document also explains that Big O looks only at the fastest growing term as input size increases. Well-chosen data structures can help reduce an algorithm's Big O complexity. For example, searching a sorted list is O(log n) rather than O(n) for an unsorted list.
The document discusses counting sort, a linear time sorting algorithm. Counting sort runs in O(n) time when the integers being sorted are in the range of 1 to k, where k is O(n). It works by counting the number of elements less than or equal to each unique input element, and using this to directly place each element in the correct position of the output array. Pseudocode and an example are provided to demonstrate how counting sort iterates through the input, counts the occurrences of each unique element, and uses this to sort the elements into the output array in linear time. However, counting sort has limitations and may not be practical for large datasets due to its required extra storage space.
The document discusses algorithms and big O notation. It defines an algorithm as a precise step-by-step procedure and notes that algorithms should be efficient, considering time and memory usage. Big O notation is introduced as a measure of how computation increases with input size. Examples are given of linear O(N) and constant O(1) time algorithms. Common sorting algorithms like bubble sort and selection sort are O(n2) while merge sort and binary search are more efficient at O(log n).
Parallel search or multithreaded search is a way to increase search speed by using additional processors.
Parallel search algorithms are classified by their scalability (that means the behavior of the algorithm as the number of processors becomes large) and their speed up.
This document discusses various algorithms for multi-armed bandit problems including k-armed bandits, action value methods like epsilon-greedy, tracking non-stationary problems, optimistic initial values, upper confidence bound action selection, gradient bandit algorithms, contextual bandits, and Thomson sampling. The k-armed bandit problem involves choosing actions to maximize reward over time without knowing the expected reward of each action. The document outlines methods for balancing exploration of unknown actions with exploitation of best known actions.
This document discusses insertion sort, including its mechanism, algorithm, runtime analysis, advantages, and disadvantages. Insertion sort works by iterating through an unsorted array and inserting each element into its sorted position by shifting other elements over. Its worst case runtime is O(n^2) when the array is reverse sorted, but it performs well on small, nearly sorted lists. While simple to implement, insertion sort is inefficient for large datasets compared to other algorithms.
The document provides an introduction to algorithms and their analysis. It discusses the definition of an algorithm, their characteristics, types and examples. It also covers the analysis of algorithms including best, average and worst case analysis. Common asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega and Theta notations are introduced to analyze the time complexity of algorithms. Examples of analyzing for loops and other control statements are provided.
The document discusses Big O notation, which is used to classify algorithms based on how their running time scales with input size. It provides examples of common Big O notations like O(1), O(log n), O(n), O(n^2), and O(n!). The document also explains that Big O looks only at the fastest growing term as input size increases. Well-chosen data structures can help reduce an algorithm's Big O complexity. For example, searching a sorted list is O(log n) rather than O(n) for an unsorted list.
This document discusses algorithm efficiency and the role of data structures. It begins by introducing algorithm efficiency and Big O notation used to describe an algorithm's efficiency. It then discusses how the structure of data an algorithm operates on can impact efficiency, giving examples of how searching a sorted list using binary search has better efficiency than searching an unsorted list. It concludes by defining abstract data types and how they are used to implement different data structures.
The document discusses the analysis of algorithm efficiency. It outlines the general framework for analyzing time and space complexity. The analysis focuses on measuring an input's size, units for measuring running time like counting basic operations, and analyzing worst-case, best-case, and average-case efficiencies. It also discusses orders of growth and amortized analysis for sequences of operations on a data structure.
The document outlines an algorithm design and analysis course taught over 12 weeks. It will cover topics like algorithm analysis, data structures, sorting, trees, hashing, and graph algorithms. Students will complete a presentation on either greedy algorithms, divide and conquer, randomized algorithms, or backtracking algorithms. The reading material is a textbook on data structures and algorithms. Examples are provided to illustrate running time analysis and the use of recursion to solve problems like printing out a positive integer digit-by-digit.
This document provides an overview of algorithms including definitions, characteristics, design, and analysis. It defines an algorithm as a finite step-by-step procedure to solve a problem and discusses their key characteristics like input, definiteness, effectiveness, finiteness, and output. The document outlines the design of algorithms using pseudo-code and their analysis in terms of time and space complexity using asymptotic notations like Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta. Examples are provided to illustrate linear search time complexity and the use of different notations to determine algorithm efficiency.
An algorithm is a set of steps to solve a problem. Algorithm efficiency describes how fast an algorithm solves problems of different sizes. Time complexity is the most important measure of efficiency, measuring the number of steps an algorithm takes based on the size of the input. Common techniques to analyze time complexity include calculating the number of operations in loops and recursions. Asymptotic notation like Big-O describes the long-term growth rate of an algorithm's running time as the input size increases.
Ilab Metis: we optimize power systems and we are not afraid of direct policy ...Olivier Teytaud
Ilab METIS is a collaboration between TAO, a machine learning and optimization team within INRIA, and Artelys, an SME focused on optimization. They work on optimizing energy policies through simulations of power systems while taking into account uncertainties and stochastic variables. Their methodologies use a hybrid of reinforcement learning, mathematical programming, and direct policy search to optimize investments and operational decisions for power grids over multiple timescales while handling constraints. They have applied their approaches to problems involving interconnection planning, demand balancing, and renewable integration on scales from cities to entire continents.
Linear search examines each element of a list sequentially, one by one, and checks if it is the target value. It has a time complexity of O(n) as it requires searching through each element in the worst case. While simple to implement, linear search is inefficient for large lists as other algorithms like binary search require fewer comparisons.
This document outlines a course on data structures and algorithms. It includes the following topics: asymptotic and algorithm analysis, complexity analysis, abstract lists and implementations, arrays, linked lists, stacks, queues, trees, graphs, sorting algorithms, minimum spanning trees, hashing, and more. The course objectives are to enable students to understand various ways to organize data, understand algorithms to manipulate data, use analyses to compare data structures and algorithms, and select relevant structures and algorithms for problems. The document also lists reference books and provides outlines on defining algorithms, analyzing time/space complexity, and asymptotic notations.
The document discusses algorithms and their analysis. It defines an algorithm as a sequence of unambiguous steps to solve a problem within a finite time. Characteristics of algorithms include being unambiguous, having inputs/outputs, and terminating in finite time. Algorithm analysis involves determining theoretical and empirical time and space complexity as input size increases. Time complexity is analyzed by counting basic operations, while space complexity considers fixed and variable memory usage. Worst, best, and average cases analyze how efficiency varies with different inputs. Asymptotic analysis focuses on long-term growth rates to compare algorithms.
This document discusses asymptotic notations and their use in analyzing the time complexity of algorithms. It introduces the Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta notations for describing the asymptotic upper bound, lower bound, and tight bound of an algorithm's running time. The document explains that asymptotic notations allow algorithms to be compared by ignoring lower-order terms and constants, and focusing on the highest-order term that dominates as the input size increases. Examples are provided to illustrate the different orders of growth and the notations used to describe them.
Unit II_Searching and Sorting Algorithms.pptHODElex
The document discusses various searching and sorting algorithms and data structures. It covers linear search and binary search algorithms. Linear search sequentially checks each element of a list to find a target value, while binary search works on a sorted list by dividing the search space in half at each step based on comparing the target to the middle element. The document also discusses asymptotic analysis techniques like Big O notation for analyzing algorithms' time and space complexity as input size increases.
The document discusses algorithms and data structures. It defines an algorithm as a well-defined procedure that takes input and produces output. Algorithms are used for calculation, data processing, and automated reasoning. The document discusses different ways of describing algorithms including natural language, flowcharts, and pseudo code. It also discusses analyzing the time complexity of algorithms using asymptotic notation such as Big-O, Omega, and Theta notation. Recursive algorithms and solving recurrences are also covered.
Artificial Intelligence Course: Linear models ananth
In this presentation we present the linear models: Regression and Classification. We illustrate with several examples. Concepts such as underfitting (Bias) and overfitting (Variance) are presented. Linear models can be used as stand alone classifiers for simple cases and they are essential building blocks as a part of larger deep learning networks
This document discusses time and space complexity analysis of algorithms. It defines key concepts like computational problems, algorithms, inputs, outputs, and properties of good algorithms. It then explains space complexity and time complexity, and provides examples of typical time functions like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential. An example C program for matrix multiplication is provided, with its time complexity analyzed as O(n^2) + O(n^3).
This document provides an overview of algorithm analysis and asymptotic complexity. It discusses learning outcomes related to analyzing algorithm efficiency using Big O, Omega, and Theta notation. Key points covered include:
- Defining the problem size n and relating algorithm running time to n
- Distinguishing between best-case, worst-case, and average-case complexity
- Using asymptotic notation like Big O to give upper bounds on complexity rather than precise calculations
- Common asymptotic categories like O(n), O(n^2), O(n log n) that classify algorithm growth rates
The document discusses greedy algorithms and their application to optimization problems. It provides examples of problems that can be solved using greedy approaches, such as fractional knapsack and making change. However, it notes that some problems like 0-1 knapsack and shortest paths on multi-stage graphs cannot be solved optimally with greedy algorithms. The document also describes various greedy algorithms for minimum spanning trees, single-source shortest paths, and fractional knapsack problems.
This document discusses algorithms and their analysis. It defines an algorithm as a finite sequence of unambiguous instructions that terminate in a finite amount of time. It discusses areas of study like algorithm design techniques, analysis of time and space complexity, testing and validation. Common algorithm complexities like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic and exponential are explained. Performance analysis techniques like asymptotic analysis and amortized analysis using aggregate analysis, accounting method and potential method are also summarized.
Dynamic Optimization without Markov Assumptions: application to power systemsOlivier Teytaud
Ilab METIS is a collaboration between TAO, a machine learning and optimization team at INRIA, and Artelys, an SME focused on optimization. They work on optimizing energy policies through modeling power systems and simulating operational and investment decisions. Their methodologies hybridize reinforcement learning, mathematical programming, and direct policy search to optimize complex, constrained problems with uncertainties while minimizing model error. They have applied these techniques to problems involving European-scale power grids with stochastic renewables.
This document provides an overview of algorithms. It begins by discussing the origins and evolution of the term "algorithm" from its Arabic roots in the 9th century to its modern meaning of a well-defined computational procedure. The document then defines algorithms and their key characteristics such as being precise, unambiguous, and terminating after a finite number of steps. Common algorithm design techniques like divide-and-conquer, greedy algorithms, and dynamic programming are introduced. Examples of merge sort and finding the maximum element in a list are used to illustrate algorithm concepts.
LLM Threats: Prompt Injections and Jailbreak AttacksThien Q. Tran
Introducing the concept of prompt jailbreak attacks of LLM, including existing attack methods, an explanation why these attacks succeed and several methods to mitigate such attacks.
This document discusses algorithm efficiency and the role of data structures. It begins by introducing algorithm efficiency and Big O notation used to describe an algorithm's efficiency. It then discusses how the structure of data an algorithm operates on can impact efficiency, giving examples of how searching a sorted list using binary search has better efficiency than searching an unsorted list. It concludes by defining abstract data types and how they are used to implement different data structures.
The document discusses the analysis of algorithm efficiency. It outlines the general framework for analyzing time and space complexity. The analysis focuses on measuring an input's size, units for measuring running time like counting basic operations, and analyzing worst-case, best-case, and average-case efficiencies. It also discusses orders of growth and amortized analysis for sequences of operations on a data structure.
The document outlines an algorithm design and analysis course taught over 12 weeks. It will cover topics like algorithm analysis, data structures, sorting, trees, hashing, and graph algorithms. Students will complete a presentation on either greedy algorithms, divide and conquer, randomized algorithms, or backtracking algorithms. The reading material is a textbook on data structures and algorithms. Examples are provided to illustrate running time analysis and the use of recursion to solve problems like printing out a positive integer digit-by-digit.
This document provides an overview of algorithms including definitions, characteristics, design, and analysis. It defines an algorithm as a finite step-by-step procedure to solve a problem and discusses their key characteristics like input, definiteness, effectiveness, finiteness, and output. The document outlines the design of algorithms using pseudo-code and their analysis in terms of time and space complexity using asymptotic notations like Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta. Examples are provided to illustrate linear search time complexity and the use of different notations to determine algorithm efficiency.
An algorithm is a set of steps to solve a problem. Algorithm efficiency describes how fast an algorithm solves problems of different sizes. Time complexity is the most important measure of efficiency, measuring the number of steps an algorithm takes based on the size of the input. Common techniques to analyze time complexity include calculating the number of operations in loops and recursions. Asymptotic notation like Big-O describes the long-term growth rate of an algorithm's running time as the input size increases.
Ilab Metis: we optimize power systems and we are not afraid of direct policy ...Olivier Teytaud
Ilab METIS is a collaboration between TAO, a machine learning and optimization team within INRIA, and Artelys, an SME focused on optimization. They work on optimizing energy policies through simulations of power systems while taking into account uncertainties and stochastic variables. Their methodologies use a hybrid of reinforcement learning, mathematical programming, and direct policy search to optimize investments and operational decisions for power grids over multiple timescales while handling constraints. They have applied their approaches to problems involving interconnection planning, demand balancing, and renewable integration on scales from cities to entire continents.
Linear search examines each element of a list sequentially, one by one, and checks if it is the target value. It has a time complexity of O(n) as it requires searching through each element in the worst case. While simple to implement, linear search is inefficient for large lists as other algorithms like binary search require fewer comparisons.
This document outlines a course on data structures and algorithms. It includes the following topics: asymptotic and algorithm analysis, complexity analysis, abstract lists and implementations, arrays, linked lists, stacks, queues, trees, graphs, sorting algorithms, minimum spanning trees, hashing, and more. The course objectives are to enable students to understand various ways to organize data, understand algorithms to manipulate data, use analyses to compare data structures and algorithms, and select relevant structures and algorithms for problems. The document also lists reference books and provides outlines on defining algorithms, analyzing time/space complexity, and asymptotic notations.
The document discusses algorithms and their analysis. It defines an algorithm as a sequence of unambiguous steps to solve a problem within a finite time. Characteristics of algorithms include being unambiguous, having inputs/outputs, and terminating in finite time. Algorithm analysis involves determining theoretical and empirical time and space complexity as input size increases. Time complexity is analyzed by counting basic operations, while space complexity considers fixed and variable memory usage. Worst, best, and average cases analyze how efficiency varies with different inputs. Asymptotic analysis focuses on long-term growth rates to compare algorithms.
This document discusses asymptotic notations and their use in analyzing the time complexity of algorithms. It introduces the Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta notations for describing the asymptotic upper bound, lower bound, and tight bound of an algorithm's running time. The document explains that asymptotic notations allow algorithms to be compared by ignoring lower-order terms and constants, and focusing on the highest-order term that dominates as the input size increases. Examples are provided to illustrate the different orders of growth and the notations used to describe them.
Unit II_Searching and Sorting Algorithms.pptHODElex
The document discusses various searching and sorting algorithms and data structures. It covers linear search and binary search algorithms. Linear search sequentially checks each element of a list to find a target value, while binary search works on a sorted list by dividing the search space in half at each step based on comparing the target to the middle element. The document also discusses asymptotic analysis techniques like Big O notation for analyzing algorithms' time and space complexity as input size increases.
The document discusses algorithms and data structures. It defines an algorithm as a well-defined procedure that takes input and produces output. Algorithms are used for calculation, data processing, and automated reasoning. The document discusses different ways of describing algorithms including natural language, flowcharts, and pseudo code. It also discusses analyzing the time complexity of algorithms using asymptotic notation such as Big-O, Omega, and Theta notation. Recursive algorithms and solving recurrences are also covered.
Artificial Intelligence Course: Linear models ananth
In this presentation we present the linear models: Regression and Classification. We illustrate with several examples. Concepts such as underfitting (Bias) and overfitting (Variance) are presented. Linear models can be used as stand alone classifiers for simple cases and they are essential building blocks as a part of larger deep learning networks
This document discusses time and space complexity analysis of algorithms. It defines key concepts like computational problems, algorithms, inputs, outputs, and properties of good algorithms. It then explains space complexity and time complexity, and provides examples of typical time functions like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential. An example C program for matrix multiplication is provided, with its time complexity analyzed as O(n^2) + O(n^3).
This document provides an overview of algorithm analysis and asymptotic complexity. It discusses learning outcomes related to analyzing algorithm efficiency using Big O, Omega, and Theta notation. Key points covered include:
- Defining the problem size n and relating algorithm running time to n
- Distinguishing between best-case, worst-case, and average-case complexity
- Using asymptotic notation like Big O to give upper bounds on complexity rather than precise calculations
- Common asymptotic categories like O(n), O(n^2), O(n log n) that classify algorithm growth rates
The document discusses greedy algorithms and their application to optimization problems. It provides examples of problems that can be solved using greedy approaches, such as fractional knapsack and making change. However, it notes that some problems like 0-1 knapsack and shortest paths on multi-stage graphs cannot be solved optimally with greedy algorithms. The document also describes various greedy algorithms for minimum spanning trees, single-source shortest paths, and fractional knapsack problems.
This document discusses algorithms and their analysis. It defines an algorithm as a finite sequence of unambiguous instructions that terminate in a finite amount of time. It discusses areas of study like algorithm design techniques, analysis of time and space complexity, testing and validation. Common algorithm complexities like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic and exponential are explained. Performance analysis techniques like asymptotic analysis and amortized analysis using aggregate analysis, accounting method and potential method are also summarized.
Dynamic Optimization without Markov Assumptions: application to power systemsOlivier Teytaud
Ilab METIS is a collaboration between TAO, a machine learning and optimization team at INRIA, and Artelys, an SME focused on optimization. They work on optimizing energy policies through modeling power systems and simulating operational and investment decisions. Their methodologies hybridize reinforcement learning, mathematical programming, and direct policy search to optimize complex, constrained problems with uncertainties while minimizing model error. They have applied these techniques to problems involving European-scale power grids with stochastic renewables.
This document provides an overview of algorithms. It begins by discussing the origins and evolution of the term "algorithm" from its Arabic roots in the 9th century to its modern meaning of a well-defined computational procedure. The document then defines algorithms and their key characteristics such as being precise, unambiguous, and terminating after a finite number of steps. Common algorithm design techniques like divide-and-conquer, greedy algorithms, and dynamic programming are introduced. Examples of merge sort and finding the maximum element in a list are used to illustrate algorithm concepts.
LLM Threats: Prompt Injections and Jailbreak AttacksThien Q. Tran
Introducing the concept of prompt jailbreak attacks of LLM, including existing attack methods, an explanation why these attacks succeed and several methods to mitigate such attacks.
This document introduces Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) and Testing with CAVs (TCAV), a technique for interpreting neural networks using human-interpretable concepts. TCAV derives a vector (CAV) to represent a concept based on example images. It then evaluates how important a concept is to a model's predictions by measuring the influence of the CAV on the model's internal representations. TCAV allows quantitative testing of concepts without retraining models, and provides a single measure to interpret entire classes or examples. The authors demonstrate how TCAV can be used to gain insights into models, detect biases, and interpret medical image classifiers.
Hypothesis testing and statistically sound-pattern miningThien Q. Tran
The availability of large datasets has lead to the need for methods that can extracts patterns in the data while providing statistical guarantees on the quality of the results, in particular with respect to false discoveries. In this talk, we firstly introduce the fundamental concepts behind statistical hypothesis testing. We then explain the computational and statistical challenges in statistically-sound pattern mining and how they have been tackled. Moreover, we will also show some application of these methods in areas such as subgraph mining, social networks analysis, basket analysis, and cancer genomics.
Deep learning in healthcare: Oppotunities and challenges with Electronic Medi...Thien Q. Tran
Interested in deep learning for healthcare has grown strongly recent years besides with the successes in other domains such as Computer Vision, Natural Language Processing, Speech Recognition and so forth. This talk will try to give a brief look into the recent effort of research in deep learning for healthcare. Especially, this talk focuses on the opportunities and challenges in using electronic health records (EHR) data, which is one of the most important data sources in healthcare domain.
MySQL InnoDB Storage Engine: Deep Dive - MydbopsMydbops
This presentation, titled "MySQL - InnoDB" and delivered by Mayank Prasad at the Mydbops Open Source Database Meetup 16 on June 8th, 2024, covers dynamic configuration of REDO logs and instant ADD/DROP columns in InnoDB.
This presentation dives deep into the world of InnoDB, exploring two ground-breaking features introduced in MySQL 8.0:
• Dynamic Configuration of REDO Logs: Enhance your database's performance and flexibility with on-the-fly adjustments to REDO log capacity. Unleash the power of the snake metaphor to visualize how InnoDB manages REDO log files.
• Instant ADD/DROP Columns: Say goodbye to costly table rebuilds! This presentation unveils how InnoDB now enables seamless addition and removal of columns without compromising data integrity or incurring downtime.
Key Learnings:
• Grasp the concept of REDO logs and their significance in InnoDB's transaction management.
• Discover the advantages of dynamic REDO log configuration and how to leverage it for optimal performance.
• Understand the inner workings of instant ADD/DROP columns and their impact on database operations.
• Gain valuable insights into the row versioning mechanism that empowers instant column modifications.
Connector Corner: Seamlessly power UiPath Apps, GenAI with prebuilt connectorsDianaGray10
Join us to learn how UiPath Apps can directly and easily interact with prebuilt connectors via Integration Service--including Salesforce, ServiceNow, Open GenAI, and more.
The best part is you can achieve this without building a custom workflow! Say goodbye to the hassle of using separate automations to call APIs. By seamlessly integrating within App Studio, you can now easily streamline your workflow, while gaining direct access to our Connector Catalog of popular applications.
We’ll discuss and demo the benefits of UiPath Apps and connectors including:
Creating a compelling user experience for any software, without the limitations of APIs.
Accelerating the app creation process, saving time and effort
Enjoying high-performance CRUD (create, read, update, delete) operations, for
seamless data management.
Speakers:
Russell Alfeche, Technology Leader, RPA at qBotic and UiPath MVP
Charlie Greenberg, host
AI in the Workplace Reskilling, Upskilling, and Future Work.pptxSunil Jagani
Discover how AI is transforming the workplace and learn strategies for reskilling and upskilling employees to stay ahead. This comprehensive guide covers the impact of AI on jobs, essential skills for the future, and successful case studies from industry leaders. Embrace AI-driven changes, foster continuous learning, and build a future-ready workforce.
Read More - https://bit.ly/3VKly70
"Choosing proper type of scaling", Olena SyrotaFwdays
Imagine an IoT processing system that is already quite mature and production-ready and for which client coverage is growing and scaling and performance aspects are life and death questions. The system has Redis, MongoDB, and stream processing based on ksqldb. In this talk, firstly, we will analyze scaling approaches and then select the proper ones for our system.
In our second session, we shall learn all about the main features and fundamentals of UiPath Studio that enable us to use the building blocks for any automation project.
📕 Detailed agenda:
Variables and Datatypes
Workflow Layouts
Arguments
Control Flows and Loops
Conditional Statements
💻 Extra training through UiPath Academy:
Variables, Constants, and Arguments in Studio
Control Flow in Studio
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverAntonios Katsarakis
This slide deck presents DLHT, a concurrent in-memory hashtable. Despite efforts to optimize hashtables, that go as far as sacrificing core functionality, state-of-the-art designs still incur multiple memory accesses per request and block request processing in three cases. First, most hashtables block while waiting for data to be retrieved from memory. Second, open-addressing designs, which represent the current state-of-the-art, either cannot free index slots on deletes or must block all requests to do so. Third, index resizes block every request until all objects are copied to the new index. Defying folklore wisdom, DLHT forgoes open-addressing and adopts a fully-featured and memory-aware closed-addressing design based on bounded cache-line-chaining. This design offers lock-free index operations and deletes that free slots instantly, (2) completes most requests with a single memory access, (3) utilizes software prefetching to hide memory latencies, and (4) employs a novel non-blocking and parallel resizing. In a commodity server and a memory-resident workload, DLHT surpasses 1.6B requests per second and provides 3.5x (12x) the throughput of the state-of-the-art closed-addressing (open-addressing) resizable hashtable on Gets (Deletes).
From Natural Language to Structured Solr Queries using LLMsSease
This talk draws on experimentation to enable AI applications with Solr. One important use case is to use AI for better accessibility and discoverability of the data: while User eXperience techniques, lexical search improvements, and data harmonization can take organizations to a good level of accessibility, a structural (or “cognitive” gap) remains between the data user needs and the data producer constraints.
That is where AI – and most importantly, Natural Language Processing and Large Language Model techniques – could make a difference. This natural language, conversational engine could facilitate access and usage of the data leveraging the semantics of any data source.
The objective of the presentation is to propose a technical approach and a way forward to achieve this goal.
The key concept is to enable users to express their search queries in natural language, which the LLM then enriches, interprets, and translates into structured queries based on the Solr index’s metadata.
This approach leverages the LLM’s ability to understand the nuances of natural language and the structure of documents within Apache Solr.
The LLM acts as an intermediary agent, offering a transparent experience to users automatically and potentially uncovering relevant documents that conventional search methods might overlook. The presentation will include the results of this experimental work, lessons learned, best practices, and the scope of future work that should improve the approach and make it production-ready.
Northern Engraving | Nameplate Manufacturing Process - 2024Northern Engraving
Manufacturing custom quality metal nameplates and badges involves several standard operations. Processes include sheet prep, lithography, screening, coating, punch press and inspection. All decoration is completed in the flat sheet with adhesive and tooling operations following. The possibilities for creating unique durable nameplates are endless. How will you create your brand identity? We can help!
inQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham HillLizaNolte
HERE IS YOUR WEBINAR CONTENT! 'Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr. Graham Hill'. We hope you find the webinar recording both insightful and enjoyable.
In this webinar, we explored essential aspects of Customer Journey Management and personalization. Here’s a summary of the key insights and topics discussed:
Key Takeaways:
Understanding the Customer Journey: Dr. Hill emphasized the importance of mapping and understanding the complete customer journey to identify touchpoints and opportunities for improvement.
Personalization Strategies: We discussed how to leverage data and insights to create personalized experiences that resonate with customers.
Technology Integration: Insights were shared on how inQuba’s advanced technology can streamline customer interactions and drive operational efficiency.
ScyllaDB is making a major architecture shift. We’re moving from vNode replication to tablets – fragments of tables that are distributed independently, enabling dynamic data distribution and extreme elasticity. In this keynote, ScyllaDB co-founder and CTO Avi Kivity explains the reason for this shift, provides a look at the implementation and roadmap, and shares how this shift benefits ScyllaDB users.
QA or the Highway - Component Testing: Bridging the gap between frontend appl...zjhamm304
These are the slides for the presentation, "Component Testing: Bridging the gap between frontend applications" that was presented at QA or the Highway 2024 in Columbus, OH by Zachary Hamm.
"What does it really mean for your system to be available, or how to define w...Fwdays
We will talk about system monitoring from a few different angles. We will start by covering the basics, then discuss SLOs, how to define them, and why understanding the business well is crucial for success in this exercise.
This talk will cover ScyllaDB Architecture from the cluster-level view and zoom in on data distribution and internal node architecture. In the process, we will learn the secret sauce used to get ScyllaDB's high availability and superior performance. We will also touch on the upcoming changes to ScyllaDB architecture, moving to strongly consistent metadata and tablets.
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance PanelsNorthern Engraving
What began over 115 years ago as a supplier of precision gauges to the automotive industry has evolved into being an industry leader in the manufacture of product branding, automotive cockpit trim and decorative appliance trim. Value-added services include in-house Design, Engineering, Program Management, Test Lab and Tool Shops.
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance Panels
Introduction to FAST-LAMP
1. A Fast Method of Statistical Assessment
for Combinatorial Hypotheses
Based on Frequent Itemset Enumeration
Shin-ichi Minato, Takeaki Uno, Koji Tsuda, Aika Terada and Jun Sese
Selection reason: Looking for some hints for speeding up the proposing method
(PKDD2014)
2. Abstract (Introduction)
● Combinatorial hypothesis assessment is a hard problem
○ Large p-value correction factor due to multiple testing
● LAMP method was proposed to exclude meaningless hypotheses
○ Based on frequent itemset enumeration
○ Can find more accurate p-value correction
● However, original implementation is time-consuming
○ Itemset mining algorithm executed many times
● This work proposed a new, faster LAMP algorithm
○ Execute itemset mining algorithm only once
○ 10 to 100 times faster than original LAMP
3. Preliminary
● be a set of items. An itemset is a subset of E.
● A transaction database D is a dataset that composed of transactions.
● An occurence of itemset X is a transaction including X
● Occurrence set Occ(X) is the set of all occurrences of X in D
● Frequency of X frq(X) is the number of occurrences of X in D
● An itemset X is called frequent for a constant if
● is the number of itemset X that is frequent for sigma
Frequent itemsets for
(apple), (beer), (rice), (milk)
(apple, beer), (milk, beer), (beer, rice)
Frequent itemsets for
(apple), (beer), (rice), (milk)
(beer, rice)
4. Frequent Itemset Mining Algorithm
● TASK: Find all itemsets that are frequent for a constant
● Start from empty set, recursively add items with depth-first search
● is condition to prevent duplicated solution
○ is the maximum item in X
● The heaviest computation is the function
5. Frequent Itemset Mining Algorithm (Update)
● An item is addible for itemset X if
● Let the set of addible items for X that satisfy
● We can add these items without calling
6. Statistical Assessment for Combinatorial Hypotheses
● Assume a classifier classify each transaction
● itemsets, transactions, positive transactions
● For a itemset X
○ the number of transactions contains X ( )
○ is the number of positive transactions in
Please neglect the numbers.
p-value of Fisher’s exact test is calculated as
where
8. Multiple testing and LAMP’s idea
● Have to keep FWER
● LAMP ideas
○ Exclude meaninglessly infrequent itemsets which never be significant
○ Itemsets having completely the same occurence set can be counted as one
● For an itemset X, the p-value cannot be smaller than
- is monotonically decreasing
- If , all infrequent itemsets (to ) can never be significant
- Let be the number of all closed itemsets that
- LAMP find the maximum that satisfies
10. Current implement of LAMP
- Intuitive approach.
- Start from most frequent itemset (null itemset)
- Conduct breadth-first search for each lower frequent parameter sigma
- Large size of memory usage
Approach 1:
Approach 2: (actually implemented)
- Depth-first search approach that requires less memory
- Have to call LCM to compute repeatly
- Time consuming
11. Reforming the problem
● Reform the problem using a threshold function
○ :
○ is monotonically decreasing for x and increasing for y
○ we reform our problem to
■
■
○ And our problem is to find largest that satisfy
12. Support increasing algorithm
● This algorithm generate itemsets starting from small sigma
● First observation
○ For a frequency sigma, if we found some k that and
then
● Second observation
○ Assume that we are considering and found k itemsets that
we can skip and go to
○ Here, we can reuse the current k itemsets
we just need to remove the itemsets with frequency
13. Support increasing algorithm
● if is relative small compared to on average, algorithm terminates fast
● Maintain can be done by using a heap to extracts the minimum frequency itemset from S
that takes
● However for large or is very large, the algorithm take very long time
14. Faster implemention
● However, we don’t need to maintain the hold using heap
● We only need the size of , we can store only the size
○ This make the step of removing infrequent itemsets
○ Moreover, adding the addible items also only takes
16. Conclusion
● Proposed a fast itemset enumeration algorithm to find the frequency threshold
satisfying the LAMP condition
● The proposed method is much faster than the original
● Future work:
○ It will be useful if we can efficiently compute the p-values for many combinatorial
hypotheses and can discover the best or top-k significant one (Our work)
○ Other tests such as X-squared test and Mann-Whitney test
○ Extension to non binary-valued database (Our work)
Comment:
- Solid work and gave such great insights about the current problem we are dealing with
- A bit surprise when reading the future work part