This document provides a summary of the OECD Project on Institutional Investors and Long-term Investment. The project aims to facilitate long-term investment by institutional investors like pension funds and sovereign wealth funds by addressing potential regulatory obstacles and market failures. It does this through cooperation between OECD economies, major investors, and other stakeholders. The project collects data on institutional investors, conducts policy analysis on issues like infrastructure investment and regulation, and holds events to engage investors and policymakers. The overall goal is to develop policy recommendations to promote long-term investing.
This brochure provides information about the OECD Project on Institutional Investors and Long-term Investment. It covers the first two years of activity following the launch of the project in February 2012. The project aims to facilitate long-term investment by institutional investors such as pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign wealth funds, addressing both potential regulatory obstacles and market failures. Acess all project research and event information online at http://www.oecd.org/finance/lti
institutional investment in infrastructure development in developing countriesArslan Shani
This document discusses the potential for institutional investors to help fill the infrastructure financing gap in developing countries. It finds that while infrastructure projects could deliver long-term returns for institutional investors, investments in emerging markets require careful structuring. The document analyzes the types of institutional investors and their current limited allocations to emerging market infrastructure. It also examines challenges to increasing such allocations, like sovereign risk and a lack of investable projects. Finally, it considers models for institutional investor involvement in infrastructure in developing countries.
Lti Why insurance regulation is crucial for longterm investment and economic ...Collegio Carlo Alberto
Regulation of the insurance industry is crucial for long-term investment and economic growth for three key reasons:
1) Insurers are large, long-term investors that provide over half of institutional investment in Europe, equivalent to 60% of the EU's GDP. Their investments have grown steadily even during financial crises.
2) Research shows insurers' investments may stabilize financial markets in downturns as they continue investing when others withdraw, though prolonged low interest rates and regulations can also lead to procyclical behavior.
3) European insurance regulation, including Solvency II, has significantly reduced insurers' equity holdings, shifting investments away from long-term assets in a way that may be
The document discusses blended finance, which is the strategic use of development finance to mobilize additional private finance for sustainable development projects. It provides the OECD's definition of blended finance and outlines its Blended Finance Principles. The OECD is working to enable development cooperation through facilitating transparency, evidence, and best practices related to mobilizing commercial finance using blended finance. It discusses building an evidence base around blended finance through data collection and reports. Key frameworks that guide the OECD's work on blended finance are also mentioned, including aligning investments with development priorities and the SDGs.
The document discusses ways the OECD can stimulate private sector investment to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It proposes developing an SDG index that institutional investors can use to target needs. It also proposes an SDG tracker tool to map how public and private finance contributes to the goals. The tool would increase transparency and help identify gaps. It would analyze descriptions of projects and company reports to map them to the SDGs. This could help maximize impact and guide investment toward the greatest needs.
This document provides an overview and summary of a forthcoming OECD report on social impact investing and sustainable development. It outlines the report's main sections which will cover the global state of the social impact investment market, a social impact investment policy framework, data and measurement principles, and policy recommendations. The document also previews the OECD's policy framework for social impact investing which maps out the key policy instruments - including informing, ruling, financing, and steering - that governments can use to promote social impact investing domestically and in development cooperation. It provides charts showing the number of countries using different policy levers in these areas.
The document provides guidance on developing the OECD's Principles Guidance on Blended Finance. It will be developed through 2019-2020 with expert and stakeholder input. It aims to help implement the Blended Finance Principles and provide references. Key topics to be addressed include defining development objectives, assessing appropriate levels of concessionality, tailoring approaches to local context, managing risks, and evaluating results. Evidence will be built through programs focused on least developed countries, fragile contexts, water and agriculture. The guidance will align with frameworks like the SDGs, Addis Ababa Action Agenda, and enhanced DFI principles on blended concessional finance. It will take the form of a dynamic digital compendium
OECD, 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships - Virginie GRANDOECD Governance
This presentation by Virginie GRAND was made at the 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships held on 17-18 February 2014. Find more information at http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/ppp.htm
This brochure provides information about the OECD Project on Institutional Investors and Long-term Investment. It covers the first two years of activity following the launch of the project in February 2012. The project aims to facilitate long-term investment by institutional investors such as pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign wealth funds, addressing both potential regulatory obstacles and market failures. Acess all project research and event information online at http://www.oecd.org/finance/lti
institutional investment in infrastructure development in developing countriesArslan Shani
This document discusses the potential for institutional investors to help fill the infrastructure financing gap in developing countries. It finds that while infrastructure projects could deliver long-term returns for institutional investors, investments in emerging markets require careful structuring. The document analyzes the types of institutional investors and their current limited allocations to emerging market infrastructure. It also examines challenges to increasing such allocations, like sovereign risk and a lack of investable projects. Finally, it considers models for institutional investor involvement in infrastructure in developing countries.
Lti Why insurance regulation is crucial for longterm investment and economic ...Collegio Carlo Alberto
Regulation of the insurance industry is crucial for long-term investment and economic growth for three key reasons:
1) Insurers are large, long-term investors that provide over half of institutional investment in Europe, equivalent to 60% of the EU's GDP. Their investments have grown steadily even during financial crises.
2) Research shows insurers' investments may stabilize financial markets in downturns as they continue investing when others withdraw, though prolonged low interest rates and regulations can also lead to procyclical behavior.
3) European insurance regulation, including Solvency II, has significantly reduced insurers' equity holdings, shifting investments away from long-term assets in a way that may be
The document discusses blended finance, which is the strategic use of development finance to mobilize additional private finance for sustainable development projects. It provides the OECD's definition of blended finance and outlines its Blended Finance Principles. The OECD is working to enable development cooperation through facilitating transparency, evidence, and best practices related to mobilizing commercial finance using blended finance. It discusses building an evidence base around blended finance through data collection and reports. Key frameworks that guide the OECD's work on blended finance are also mentioned, including aligning investments with development priorities and the SDGs.
The document discusses ways the OECD can stimulate private sector investment to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It proposes developing an SDG index that institutional investors can use to target needs. It also proposes an SDG tracker tool to map how public and private finance contributes to the goals. The tool would increase transparency and help identify gaps. It would analyze descriptions of projects and company reports to map them to the SDGs. This could help maximize impact and guide investment toward the greatest needs.
This document provides an overview and summary of a forthcoming OECD report on social impact investing and sustainable development. It outlines the report's main sections which will cover the global state of the social impact investment market, a social impact investment policy framework, data and measurement principles, and policy recommendations. The document also previews the OECD's policy framework for social impact investing which maps out the key policy instruments - including informing, ruling, financing, and steering - that governments can use to promote social impact investing domestically and in development cooperation. It provides charts showing the number of countries using different policy levers in these areas.
The document provides guidance on developing the OECD's Principles Guidance on Blended Finance. It will be developed through 2019-2020 with expert and stakeholder input. It aims to help implement the Blended Finance Principles and provide references. Key topics to be addressed include defining development objectives, assessing appropriate levels of concessionality, tailoring approaches to local context, managing risks, and evaluating results. Evidence will be built through programs focused on least developed countries, fragile contexts, water and agriculture. The guidance will align with frameworks like the SDGs, Addis Ababa Action Agenda, and enhanced DFI principles on blended concessional finance. It will take the form of a dynamic digital compendium
OECD, 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships - Virginie GRANDOECD Governance
This presentation by Virginie GRAND was made at the 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships held on 17-18 February 2014. Find more information at http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/ppp.htm
Capital Flow Measures and Research ChallengesMacropru Reader
The document discusses structural changes in credit intermediation and challenges in monitoring international capital flows. It notes that banking organizations have become more complex with diverse business models and global operations. Nonbank intermediation has also grown. There are still data gaps and challenges in data management and analysis when monitoring the evolving financial system. Collaboration between statistical agencies and researchers is important for addressing these challenges.
Real estate, followed by infrastructure, dominate real asset investing, according to a new global study. Learn why in our new report sponsored by BlackRock. More information: http://bit.ly/AraBlk
OECD presentation on financing for sustainable development in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Filling the SDG financing gap and aligning resources in support of sustainable and inclusive development.
Watch the launch of Strengthening FDI and SME Linkages in Portugal, held on 12 January 2022, featured opening remarks by by H.E. Pedro Siza Vieira, Minister of State for the Economy and Digital Transition, Portugal, and Yoshiki Takeuchi, Deputy Secretary-General, OECD. The event also featured expert contributions from the OECD, European Commission and Portuguese government officials.
The report found that while Portugal has a framework in place to encourage foreign firms and local SME collaboration, this now needs to be evaluated and also supported by regionally tailored approaches.
Explore the report at www.bitly.com/portugal-fdisme
European Private Equity & Venture Capital AssociationLucas Wyrsch
Executive Summary
Fundraising → Pages 7-26
• Overall fundraising decreased in 2012 by 43% to €23.6bn compared to 2011. This reduction was driven by lower activity of larger funds. In 2012 only 13 funds were raising more than €250m compared to 26 in 2011. Funds that raised in excess of €250m in 2012 dropped in total volume by 51% compared to 2011. In contrast, the volume raised by funds smaller than €250m reduced by only 25% in the same period.
• Pension funds and fund of funds accounted for almost half of all sources of funds with more than 20% each. Family offices & private individuals, government agencies and sovereign wealth funds follow as major sources with 10-12% each.
• Despite macroeconomic challenges, €8.6bn (40%) of funds raised came from institutional investors outside of Europe.
Investments → Pages 27-59
• The overall amount of €36.5bn invested in European companies in 2012 reduced by 19% compared to the previous year. This was due to the weak first half of 2012 coinciding with economic uncertainty in Europe. In contrast, the number of private equity backed companies remained stable at almost 5,000 European companies. Therefore, it was less capital intensive for the industry to invest in a constant number of companies in Europe. About 43% of the companies that received investment in 2012 were private equity backed for the first time.
• The total amount of venture capital invested reduced year on year by 14% to €3.2bn. The number of venture capital backed companies remained stable at about 2,900. For the first time more than 1,000 companies attracted growth investments despite a decrease in amount of 26% compared to 2011. Buyout investments reached €28bn. More than 800 companies received buyout investments similar to the level from 2011 although the investment amount reduced by 19%.
Divestments → Pages 61-72
• More than 2,000 European companies were exited, representing former equity investments of €22bn. While the number of companies remained stable the amount divested at cost decreased by 29%.
• Of all exited companies in 2012 venture capital represented almost 50% and growth 23%. Their typical exits included trade sale, sale to another private equity firm and write-off. Buyout related exits attributed 85% of equity amount divested at cost. This presents a decline of 26%. Prominent exit routes were trade sale, sale to another private equity firm and public offering.
• Initial Public Offering (IPO) levels remained very low. Only three buyout and five venture capital investments were able to take this exit route.
G20 DWG meeting - OECD on SDG Alignment Rachel Morris
Finance for Sustainable Development: Filling the gap, aligning finance to the SDGs
For more information: http://www.oecd.org/development/global-outlook-on-financing-for-sustainable-development-2021-e3c30a9a-en.htm
Alternative Investments_JankoTrenkoski_CEEConference_Prague_March2016Babica73
This document discusses alternative investments as a potential new solution for pension funds. It outlines that pension fund assets are expected to grow significantly by 2020 and there will be a fundamental shift towards alternative assets like real estate, private equity, and hedge funds. Pension funds are currently the largest investors in alternatives. Alternative investments are defined as aiming to generate improved risk-adjusted returns through diversification. Case studies show that large developed market pension funds like NEST, CALPERS, and ABP have significant allocations to alternatives. While alternatives are not yet mainstream in Central and Eastern Europe, real estate is expected to grow as a major alternative category for pension funds in the region.
RDIF, Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, and China Investment Corporation (CIC) are to invest in a joint Russia-China Science and Technology Innovation Fund with a target capital of $1 billon.
Nigeria requires an estimated $3 trillion by 2044 to finance critical infrastructure projects, which amounts to $100 billion annually. However, current levels of financing are insufficient to meet these needs. This document outlines Nigeria's national financing strategy to close this gap by leveraging multiple sources of domestic and international financing. It identifies taxation, capital markets, exports, foreign direct investment, remittances, and official development assistance as potential sustainable sources of capital. The strategy also explores ways to access financing from multilateral development institutions and private investors through instruments like development policy loans, risk mitigation facilities, and blended concessional finance. Reforms are needed to address barriers inhibiting access to financing, including inconsistencies in tax law, illicit
Site-Selection Process and Agents in FDI PromotionZoran Vaupot
In the last few decades, foreign direct investments
have grown in their importance. We have access to a rich
set of literature about FDI determinants and FDI promotion
activities.
The research about the site-selection process
conducted by foreign investors is much less abundant. We
propose an explanation to this phenomenon and possible
changes in strategic approach by combining conclusions
from existing literature concerning the topics about investment
promotion process, its stakeholders, site-selection
process, and institutional theory.
The main conclusions are that a better customer-centric orientation is needed in the whole process of FDI promotion and that the relatively neglected importance of media should be improved by putting more attention on their role according to the findings of institutional theory; these are also the proposed axes of future research.
The originality of the present research is the combination of theoretical findings with the practical experiences of the author gained while working as an international business consultant.
This document provides background information on a student assignment analyzing foreign direct investment in Kazakhstan. The assignment includes an introduction outlining its structure, research objectives, and a literature review discussing an article on benefits of FDI in developing countries. It then provides definitions and discussions of FDI, including advantages and disadvantages. The main body is a case study on FDI opportunities in Kazakhstan, covering its geography, history, political system, economy and business environment.
The document discusses Sweden's implementation of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It states that all government ministers are responsible for implementing the 2030 Agenda within their policy areas. Sweden's focus areas include strengthening SDG 14 on oceans, promoting decent work, and a feminist foreign policy. A National Delegation has been appointed to support and monitor Sweden's domestic and global implementation of the Agenda. The Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA) and Sweden's Policy for Global Development are connected frameworks for fulfilling the objectives of the 2030 Agenda through mobilizing resources and engaging all stakeholders.
Presented at the 4th Global Infrastructure Basel Summit 21 & 22 May 2014.
Read more about the world leading platform for Sustainable Infrastructure Finance at www.gib-foundation.org.
Next Summit: 27 & 28 May 2015 in Switzerland
US direct investments in Latvia have experienced two major waves since 1991, peaking in 2003 and again in 2009-2015, before declining sharply from 2016-2019. Non-financial indicators like the number of investors, recipient enterprises, and deals also peaked around 2004 before steadily declining. Financial indicators show generally small average investment flows per investor, recipient, and deal. While Latvia joining the EU in 2004 may have initially attracted more investment, the economic crisis beginning in 2008 contributed to declines. Sustainability factors like environmental and social responsibilities are not strongly reflected in investment trends so far.
Sovereign wealth funds and the principle of state immunity from taxation. whi...SWFinvestguide.com
This document discusses the taxation of investments by Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) in recipient countries. It begins by providing context on SWFs, noting that many are owned by developing countries and economies in transition and invest significant assets in developed countries. It then reviews the tax treatment of SWF investments in major recipient countries like the US and Europe. The document aims to analyze principles of state immunity from taxation and how they relate to SWF investments, in order to develop a theory on how to appropriately tax SWFs while also supporting their role in economic development.
Towards and Integrated Governance Framework for Infrastructure by Ian Hawkesw...OECD Governance
Presentation by Ian Hawkesworth at the 7th annual meeting of the MENA Senior Budget Officials held on 10-11 December 2014. Find more information at http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting
The document discusses resource revenue management and redistribution to sub-national governments. It provides an overview of reasons for sub-national redistribution including recognizing local claims, compensating for negative impacts, and promoting economic development. It then examines different models countries use for redistribution, including derivation-based systems that allocate a share of revenues based on production location, and indicator-based systems that use development indicators. The document discusses factors for determining how much to redistribute and strategies for avoiding inequalities between resource and non-resource regions.
The document discusses financing options for the post-2015 development agenda. It notes that a framework should emphasize domestic resource mobilization, leverage new sources of financing like emerging economies and the private sector, and utilize innovative financing instruments. A variety of financing sources will be needed including domestic taxes, foreign aid, private investment, and new funding mechanisms. Countries' ability to effectively utilize funds depends on good policies and institutions. Public funds can also be used to catalyze greater private financing, especially for infrastructure.
Capital Flow Measures and Research ChallengesMacropru Reader
The document discusses structural changes in credit intermediation and challenges in monitoring international capital flows. It notes that banking organizations have become more complex with diverse business models and global operations. Nonbank intermediation has also grown. There are still data gaps and challenges in data management and analysis when monitoring the evolving financial system. Collaboration between statistical agencies and researchers is important for addressing these challenges.
Real estate, followed by infrastructure, dominate real asset investing, according to a new global study. Learn why in our new report sponsored by BlackRock. More information: http://bit.ly/AraBlk
OECD presentation on financing for sustainable development in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Filling the SDG financing gap and aligning resources in support of sustainable and inclusive development.
Watch the launch of Strengthening FDI and SME Linkages in Portugal, held on 12 January 2022, featured opening remarks by by H.E. Pedro Siza Vieira, Minister of State for the Economy and Digital Transition, Portugal, and Yoshiki Takeuchi, Deputy Secretary-General, OECD. The event also featured expert contributions from the OECD, European Commission and Portuguese government officials.
The report found that while Portugal has a framework in place to encourage foreign firms and local SME collaboration, this now needs to be evaluated and also supported by regionally tailored approaches.
Explore the report at www.bitly.com/portugal-fdisme
European Private Equity & Venture Capital AssociationLucas Wyrsch
Executive Summary
Fundraising → Pages 7-26
• Overall fundraising decreased in 2012 by 43% to €23.6bn compared to 2011. This reduction was driven by lower activity of larger funds. In 2012 only 13 funds were raising more than €250m compared to 26 in 2011. Funds that raised in excess of €250m in 2012 dropped in total volume by 51% compared to 2011. In contrast, the volume raised by funds smaller than €250m reduced by only 25% in the same period.
• Pension funds and fund of funds accounted for almost half of all sources of funds with more than 20% each. Family offices & private individuals, government agencies and sovereign wealth funds follow as major sources with 10-12% each.
• Despite macroeconomic challenges, €8.6bn (40%) of funds raised came from institutional investors outside of Europe.
Investments → Pages 27-59
• The overall amount of €36.5bn invested in European companies in 2012 reduced by 19% compared to the previous year. This was due to the weak first half of 2012 coinciding with economic uncertainty in Europe. In contrast, the number of private equity backed companies remained stable at almost 5,000 European companies. Therefore, it was less capital intensive for the industry to invest in a constant number of companies in Europe. About 43% of the companies that received investment in 2012 were private equity backed for the first time.
• The total amount of venture capital invested reduced year on year by 14% to €3.2bn. The number of venture capital backed companies remained stable at about 2,900. For the first time more than 1,000 companies attracted growth investments despite a decrease in amount of 26% compared to 2011. Buyout investments reached €28bn. More than 800 companies received buyout investments similar to the level from 2011 although the investment amount reduced by 19%.
Divestments → Pages 61-72
• More than 2,000 European companies were exited, representing former equity investments of €22bn. While the number of companies remained stable the amount divested at cost decreased by 29%.
• Of all exited companies in 2012 venture capital represented almost 50% and growth 23%. Their typical exits included trade sale, sale to another private equity firm and write-off. Buyout related exits attributed 85% of equity amount divested at cost. This presents a decline of 26%. Prominent exit routes were trade sale, sale to another private equity firm and public offering.
• Initial Public Offering (IPO) levels remained very low. Only three buyout and five venture capital investments were able to take this exit route.
G20 DWG meeting - OECD on SDG Alignment Rachel Morris
Finance for Sustainable Development: Filling the gap, aligning finance to the SDGs
For more information: http://www.oecd.org/development/global-outlook-on-financing-for-sustainable-development-2021-e3c30a9a-en.htm
Alternative Investments_JankoTrenkoski_CEEConference_Prague_March2016Babica73
This document discusses alternative investments as a potential new solution for pension funds. It outlines that pension fund assets are expected to grow significantly by 2020 and there will be a fundamental shift towards alternative assets like real estate, private equity, and hedge funds. Pension funds are currently the largest investors in alternatives. Alternative investments are defined as aiming to generate improved risk-adjusted returns through diversification. Case studies show that large developed market pension funds like NEST, CALPERS, and ABP have significant allocations to alternatives. While alternatives are not yet mainstream in Central and Eastern Europe, real estate is expected to grow as a major alternative category for pension funds in the region.
RDIF, Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, and China Investment Corporation (CIC) are to invest in a joint Russia-China Science and Technology Innovation Fund with a target capital of $1 billon.
Nigeria requires an estimated $3 trillion by 2044 to finance critical infrastructure projects, which amounts to $100 billion annually. However, current levels of financing are insufficient to meet these needs. This document outlines Nigeria's national financing strategy to close this gap by leveraging multiple sources of domestic and international financing. It identifies taxation, capital markets, exports, foreign direct investment, remittances, and official development assistance as potential sustainable sources of capital. The strategy also explores ways to access financing from multilateral development institutions and private investors through instruments like development policy loans, risk mitigation facilities, and blended concessional finance. Reforms are needed to address barriers inhibiting access to financing, including inconsistencies in tax law, illicit
Site-Selection Process and Agents in FDI PromotionZoran Vaupot
In the last few decades, foreign direct investments
have grown in their importance. We have access to a rich
set of literature about FDI determinants and FDI promotion
activities.
The research about the site-selection process
conducted by foreign investors is much less abundant. We
propose an explanation to this phenomenon and possible
changes in strategic approach by combining conclusions
from existing literature concerning the topics about investment
promotion process, its stakeholders, site-selection
process, and institutional theory.
The main conclusions are that a better customer-centric orientation is needed in the whole process of FDI promotion and that the relatively neglected importance of media should be improved by putting more attention on their role according to the findings of institutional theory; these are also the proposed axes of future research.
The originality of the present research is the combination of theoretical findings with the practical experiences of the author gained while working as an international business consultant.
This document provides background information on a student assignment analyzing foreign direct investment in Kazakhstan. The assignment includes an introduction outlining its structure, research objectives, and a literature review discussing an article on benefits of FDI in developing countries. It then provides definitions and discussions of FDI, including advantages and disadvantages. The main body is a case study on FDI opportunities in Kazakhstan, covering its geography, history, political system, economy and business environment.
The document discusses Sweden's implementation of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It states that all government ministers are responsible for implementing the 2030 Agenda within their policy areas. Sweden's focus areas include strengthening SDG 14 on oceans, promoting decent work, and a feminist foreign policy. A National Delegation has been appointed to support and monitor Sweden's domestic and global implementation of the Agenda. The Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA) and Sweden's Policy for Global Development are connected frameworks for fulfilling the objectives of the 2030 Agenda through mobilizing resources and engaging all stakeholders.
Presented at the 4th Global Infrastructure Basel Summit 21 & 22 May 2014.
Read more about the world leading platform for Sustainable Infrastructure Finance at www.gib-foundation.org.
Next Summit: 27 & 28 May 2015 in Switzerland
US direct investments in Latvia have experienced two major waves since 1991, peaking in 2003 and again in 2009-2015, before declining sharply from 2016-2019. Non-financial indicators like the number of investors, recipient enterprises, and deals also peaked around 2004 before steadily declining. Financial indicators show generally small average investment flows per investor, recipient, and deal. While Latvia joining the EU in 2004 may have initially attracted more investment, the economic crisis beginning in 2008 contributed to declines. Sustainability factors like environmental and social responsibilities are not strongly reflected in investment trends so far.
Sovereign wealth funds and the principle of state immunity from taxation. whi...SWFinvestguide.com
This document discusses the taxation of investments by Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) in recipient countries. It begins by providing context on SWFs, noting that many are owned by developing countries and economies in transition and invest significant assets in developed countries. It then reviews the tax treatment of SWF investments in major recipient countries like the US and Europe. The document aims to analyze principles of state immunity from taxation and how they relate to SWF investments, in order to develop a theory on how to appropriately tax SWFs while also supporting their role in economic development.
Towards and Integrated Governance Framework for Infrastructure by Ian Hawkesw...OECD Governance
Presentation by Ian Hawkesworth at the 7th annual meeting of the MENA Senior Budget Officials held on 10-11 December 2014. Find more information at http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting
The document discusses resource revenue management and redistribution to sub-national governments. It provides an overview of reasons for sub-national redistribution including recognizing local claims, compensating for negative impacts, and promoting economic development. It then examines different models countries use for redistribution, including derivation-based systems that allocate a share of revenues based on production location, and indicator-based systems that use development indicators. The document discusses factors for determining how much to redistribute and strategies for avoiding inequalities between resource and non-resource regions.
The document discusses financing options for the post-2015 development agenda. It notes that a framework should emphasize domestic resource mobilization, leverage new sources of financing like emerging economies and the private sector, and utilize innovative financing instruments. A variety of financing sources will be needed including domestic taxes, foreign aid, private investment, and new funding mechanisms. Countries' ability to effectively utilize funds depends on good policies and institutions. Public funds can also be used to catalyze greater private financing, especially for infrastructure.
BIS (Business Intelligence and Strategy) Research ProfileBIS Research Inc.
BIS Research is a technology research and advisory firm that provides market intelligence reports on emerging technologies across over 10 industries. It offers syndicated research reports, custom research services, and database subscriptions. BIS Research employs over 600 hours of analyst research for each report and uses a four phase iterative research process to analyze technologies, companies, applications, geographies, and forecast market trends. The company is led by a team of experts from consulting, banking, government, and academia with extensive industry experience.
What can you expect?
High global and personal service, transparency, qualified staff and crew, flexible and professional personnel solutions, 24/7 responsiveness and complete cross border payroll services.
Marloes van der Heijden
p: +31 (0)88 447 94 21 m: +31 (
RECRUITMENT
The Recruitment department is the
heart of iPS. It is our goal to find the
right candidates for our clients, who
will perform their duties safely and
professionally. We do this by getting to
know our candidates personally during
the application and selection process.
Our recruitment consultants are
specialists in their respective industries.
They know exactly what skills and
experience clients are looking for.
Through our extensive international
network and database we are able to
source the best talent worldwide.
In 2015 we onboarded
This document provides an overview and market analysis of the global smart light fixture, control, and services market from 2015 to 2020. It discusses the transition from traditional lighting to smart, connected lighting technologies. The market is analyzed by lighting type (LED, HID, etc.), components (sensors, ballasts, relays), applications (commercial, residential), and regional trends. Detailed market statistics and forecasts are given for fixture revenues, component values, and application segment sizes over the 6-year period.
3D Printing Market ( A comprehensive study on Material ( MEtal, PLastics, Cer...BIS Research Inc.
The report has covered more than 50 players involved in the 3D printing and Additive Manufacturing technology.
The report presents a detailed market analysis of 3D printing and Additive Manufacturing by incorporating complete pricing and cost analysis of components & products, product benchmarking, Porter’s analysis and PEST (Political, Economic, Social & Technological factor) analysis of the market. Market Classification encompasses segmentation & sub-segmentation of the market by Technology, Materials, Application industry and Geography.
The report deals with all the driving factors, restraints, and opportunities with respect to the 3D printing and Additive Manufacturing market, which are helpful in identifying trends and key success factors for the industry. Lastly, the current market landscape is covered with detailed competitive landscape and company profiles of all key players across the ecosystem. The report also formulates the entire value chain of the market, along with industry trends of 3D printing application industries and materials used with emphasis on market timelines & technology roadmaps, and market & product life cycle analysis.
Lastly, the 3D printing and Additive Manufacturing market is segmented by geography across North America, South & Central America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and ROW (Rest of the World) and further sub-segmented by countries. Country specific market is estimated and the growth opportunities are identified.
n electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) or electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) is a battery operated device which simulates the experience of tobacco smoking without the inhalation of smoke. This device which is being reckoned as an alternative of conventional cigarettes emits vaporized nicotine which is inhaled by the user. The global e-cigarette product market value is estimated to grow over $39.6 billion by 2024, at a CAGR of 27.3% from 2014 to 2024.
Electronic Cigarette & E Vapor market study includes segmentation of electronic cigarette industry based upon types, composition, components, and geography. The market potential of electronic cigarette based on these segments has been analyzed.
Since 1988 iPS is an international recruitment and crewing agency which combines experience, in-depth knowledge and people to successfully serve businesses in the following industries: Maritime, Offshore, Oil & Gas and Tunnelling. In addition, iPS is experienced in cross border payroll solutions.
With operating offices worldwide, iPS has its headquarters in Capelle aan den IJssel, near Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
This document discusses governance standards for institutional investments and integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. It finds that few institutional investors currently consider ESG impacts in their investment processes. Governance standards are not seen as barriers to ESG integration, but regulatory frameworks provide limited explicit recognition of ESG issues. The document also outlines various infrastructure financing instruments, transaction enablers, risks, policy tools, and barriers to infrastructure investment. It concludes with the G20/OECD High-Level Principles on long-term investment by institutional investors.
#Environmental and social #risk due diligence in the #financial sector. #BanksAgustin del Castillo
This document provides an overview of a study mapping environmental and social risk due diligence practices in the financial sector. It finds that while many financial institutions conduct some level of environmental and social risk assessment, approaches vary depending on business models and services provided. The study aimed to better understand current due diligence processes and the level of influence financial institutions perceive they have over clients' environmental and social impacts. It involved surveys of over 50 financial institutions globally and interviews with 30 institutions. Key findings included that risk-based due diligence approaches differ based on transaction types, and leverage over clients depends on the nature of the financial relationship. The study seeks to inform dialogue on responsible business conduct expectations for the sector.
The Policy Framework for Investment is a comprehensive and systematic tool for improving investment conditions. This brochure explains what it is, how it works and who is using it.
More tools and information are available online at www.oecd.org/investment/pfi.htm
This document summarizes a research paper that examines factors influencing the fund management industry. The key factors identified are front-end/back-end loads, outsourced portfolios, corporate governance, security and privacy, behavioral approaches, fund performance comparison and measurement. Problems associated with each factor are discussed, such as hidden fees reducing investor returns. Potential solutions are proposed, like increasing transparency around fees. The research methodology involves identifying these factors through literature review and analyzing problems and solutions to draw conclusions.
Sustainable Development Goals and Development Impact Bonds Taruna Gupta
Development Impact Bonds (DIBs) are a new financing mechanism that ties funding to measurable social outcomes. Private investors provide upfront capital for social programs, which service providers implement. An independent evaluator measures the program's success. If the program achieves agreed-upon outcomes, outcome funders like donors repay investors based on results, otherwise investors may lose their capital. DIBs aim to improve social programs by focusing on results, transferring risk from the public to private sector, and attracting private funding for development. However, DIBs also face challenges like changing mindsets to see development as an investment, concerns about increasing bureaucracy, and ensuring proper risk management. Key lessons indicate initial investors will seek social returns, strong risk mit
A Study on Factors Influencing Investment Decision Regarding Various Financia...ijtsrd
In the current era of financial inclusion, digitalization and economy driving towards a faster pace, the investors are very much concerned about their savings which can be transferred into investments. The main purpose of investment is to maximize the returns out of it with minimum expenses and risk. There are various factors which affect the investment decision like demographic factors and behavioural biases which decides the type, tenure, amount of the investment. This paper explores that return, advice, tax benefit, liquidity risk appetite of the investors altogether plays a significant part in influencing the investors. Is there any impact of demographic factors like age, gender and income on factors influencing investment decision tried to find out. The results show that factors influencing the investment decision are influenced by income level not by age and gender. Dr. Ankit Jain | Mr Raj Tandel "A Study on Factors Influencing Investment Decision Regarding Various Financial Products" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-6 , October 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd33678.pdf Paper Url: https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/accounting-and-finance/33678/a-study-on-factors-influencing-investment-decision-regarding-various-financial-products/dr-ankit-jain
How are EMEA investors responding to changing macroeconomic and regulatory environments, stakeholder objectives and pressures, and market conditions? Based on a survey of 200 institutional investors in the region, this report takes a detailed look.
Responsible investment is an approach to investment that explicitly acknowledges the relevance to the investor of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, and the long-term health and stability of the market as a whole. It recognises that generating long-term sustainable returns is dependent on stable, well-functioning and well governed social, environmental and economic systems.
It is driven by a growing recognition in the financial community that effective research, analysis and evaluation of ESG issues is a fundamental part of assessing the value and performance of an investment over the medium and longer term, and that this analysis should inform asset allocation, stock selection, portfolio construction, shareholder engagement and voting.
Even though many asset owners have made commitments to responsible investment, the majority have yet to ensure that these are effectively implemented. There are inconsistencies in investment practices in different asset classes, high-level statements on sustainability or environmental, social and governance issues are often missing from investment beliefs, and responsible investment commitments are not embedded in investment mandates.
This creates a multiplier effect throughout the investment market. Weak implementation of responsible investment by individual asset owners sends signals to the investment market as a whole that responsible investment is not a priority for asset owners. In turn, this limits the willingness of investment consultants and investment managers to focus on responsible investment and ESG issues in their products and in their advice.
By implementing their commitments to responsible investment with sufficient scale and depth, asset owners can accelerate the development of responsible investment through the investment chain.
OECD 2015 GIB Workshop summary :-Ruben Rojas|Deputy Executive Director at IBank Aditi Khandelwal
The document summarizes discussions from a workshop on green investment banks (GIBs) held by the OECD. Key points from the workshop include:
- GIBs have invested billions globally to fund low-carbon infrastructure and leverage private capital, focusing on sectors like offshore wind and energy efficiency.
- New GIBs are being established while existing GIBs are gaining experience and developing new financing models.
- GIBs use public funds to "crowd in" private investment, operating independently from governments to fund projects private investors avoid.
- Participants shared experiences of different GIB models and financing approaches. They agreed increased collaboration could help GIBs and other public financial institutions learn from each other.
Intangibles: the new sources of growth (OECD project)Marcos CAVALCANTI
This project aims to study intangible assets as a new source of economic growth. Intangible assets such as research and development, software, brands, and organizational capital are growing rapidly and contributing significantly to company value and productivity. However, intangible assets are not fully measured and accounted for. The goals of the project are to improve measurement of intangibles, understand their impact on growth and business models, assess effects of the economic crisis, and identify policy challenges to promote intangible asset accumulation. The project involves the OECD and other countries and will host several events on issues related to intangible assets and growth.
This document lays out a roadmap for governments and private stakeholders to increase private investment in infrastructure projects. It discusses grouping policy proposals according to the typical project cycle, which includes project preparation and evaluation, financing, procurement and approvals, and operations and asset management. The document emphasizes that improving project preparation, such as developing standard contracts and providing technical support during preparation, can significantly increase the number and scale of projects by eliminating issues affecting current projects. It also recommends establishing facilities that provide funding for project preparation activities.
Innovation’s Role in Mobilizing Private Financing Javier Mozó
Final presentation of the World Bank MOOC "Financing for Development / Billions to Trillions to Action". This PPT was made in Dec 2015. Its been some time and therefore Caaapital has changed a bit in its focus and tools, but the core objectives and ideas shown on this presentation remain the same.
The document discusses challenges and opportunities for institutional investors to invest in climate projects in emerging economies. It identifies actions governments and organizations can take to increase private investment in climate projects, including establishing stable policies, building project pipelines, developing risk mitigation tools, and strengthening coordination among public and private finance institutions. The document also provides specific country and fund examples of how to structure public-private partnerships to "crowd in" private investment for climate and development projects.
ESG Meets FinTech – A Strategic Analysis Executive SummaryMEDICI Inner Circle
MEDICI’s new ‘ESG Meets FinTech – A Strategic Analysis’ covers the impact of financial technology on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria. It analyzes the various dimensions of ESG and sustainability in the context of FinTech.
This document provides an overview of opportunities and challenges for foreign investors in Bangladesh's garment industry. It discusses the history and development of the garment industry in Bangladesh. It also analyzes factors affecting foreign direct investment, including regulatory policies, political stability, economic conditions, and opportunities in the textile and apparel sector. The garment industry remains an important source of foreign investment, though Bangladesh could benefit from attracting more investment in higher value products and backward linkages.
ESG Workshop hosted by Graham Sinclair at Sustain Our Africa 26 October 2012 ...Graham Sinclair
naugural Sustain Our Africa Summit and The Festival for Change: Can Africa deliver enough for all, forever? Week-long Summit, Cape Town, South Africa, 24 - 26 October 2012 http://sustainourafrica.org/
Day One & Two Awareness and Inspiration for Change
Day Three: The Tools for Change – INCUBATING SOLUTIONS FOR ADAPTABILITY & RESILIENCE - Investment Workshop with Graham Sinclair
Technological advances and globalization have led to major advances for many, but have seen others income and well-being stagnate or even decline. These disparities, both real and perceived - are more broadly, how to make growth inclusive - are some of the greatest challenges facing the world today. Support for inclusive growth - that is, economic growth that is broad-based, sustainable, and provides opportunities for all to participate in its benefits - is gaining momentum. The hoped-for result: dramatic reduction of poverty and inequality. As the world seeks to address these challenges, there is significant potential for private sector actors to pursue unique opportunities that support inclusive growth.
The Inclusive Growth Opportunities Index, developed by The Economist Intelligence Unit with the Morgan Stanley Institute for Sustainable Investing, seeks to connect the need for inclusive growth solutions with investment opportunity. A first-of-its-kind, the Inclusive Growth Opportunities Index offers an analytic framework to rate and rank countries, identifying investment opportunities in technology-based solutions to support inclusive growth.
ICESDF_outreach_Helsinki_Co-creating partnersips for SD financing_outcomeSari Sironen
This document provides a summary of a multi-stakeholder outreach event held in Helsinki, Finland from April 3-4, 2014 to discuss partnerships for financing sustainable development. The event was organized by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland and Aalto University in cooperation with the UN Intergovernmental Committee of Experts on Sustainable Development Financing (ICESDF). Over 100 participants from public, private and civil society sectors across four continents attended.
The document summarizes the key discussions and messages around enabling greater private sector involvement in sustainable development financing. It was noted that while commitments from businesses are encouraging, more action is needed to align private investments with sustainable development objectives. New partnerships were proposed to better channel private flows towards priority
The document is a thesis that examines principles of socially responsible investment and sustainable banking. It provides background on these topics and defines the problem of how to transition a regional/local bank's business towards sustainability. The research aims to identify factors that can limit or further this transition. The methodology includes literature reviews and case studies of sustainable banks and financial institutions. The findings show international SRI principles like transparency and risk management filtering down to local sustainable banking. However, banking realities like regulations and market interests also influence the transition process. Overall, sustainable banks can create public value through financial consulting, project exploration, and offering norm-setting products, though credibility is essential for integrity and competitive advantage.
Similar to Institutional Investors and Long-term Investment, Project report, OECD (20)
Understanding how timely GST payments influence a lender's decision to approve loans, this topic explores the correlation between GST compliance and creditworthiness. It highlights how consistent GST payments can enhance a business's financial credibility, potentially leading to higher chances of loan approval.
Vicinity Jobs’ data includes more than three million 2023 OJPs and thousands of skills. Most skills appear in less than 0.02% of job postings, so most postings rely on a small subset of commonly used terms, like teamwork.
Laura Adkins-Hackett, Economist, LMIC, and Sukriti Trehan, Data Scientist, LMIC, presented their research exploring trends in the skills listed in OJPs to develop a deeper understanding of in-demand skills. This research project uses pointwise mutual information and other methods to extract more information about common skills from the relationships between skills, occupations and regions.
2. Elemental Economics - Mineral demand.pdfNeal Brewster
After this second you should be able to: Explain the main determinants of demand for any mineral product, and their relative importance; recognise and explain how demand for any product is likely to change with economic activity; recognise and explain the roles of technology and relative prices in influencing demand; be able to explain the differences between the rates of growth of demand for different products.
Economic Risk Factor Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
May’s reports showed signs of continued economic growth, said Sam Millette, director, fixed income, in his latest Economic Risk Factor Update.
For more market updates, subscribe to The Independent Market Observer at https://blog.commonwealth.com/independent-market-observer.
5 Tips for Creating Standard Financial ReportsEasyReports
Well-crafted financial reports serve as vital tools for decision-making and transparency within an organization. By following the undermentioned tips, you can create standardized financial reports that effectively communicate your company's financial health and performance to stakeholders.
^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Duba...mayaclinic18
Whatsapp (+971581248768) Buy Abortion Pills In Dubai/ Qatar/Kuwait/Doha/Abu Dhabi/Alain/RAK City/Satwa/Al Ain/Abortion Pills For Sale In Qatar, Doha. Abu az Zuluf. Abu Thaylah. Ad Dawhah al Jadidah. Al Arish, Al Bida ash Sharqiyah, Al Ghanim, Al Ghuwariyah, Qatari, Abu Dhabi, Dubai.. WHATSAPP +971)581248768 Abortion Pills / Cytotec Tablets Available in Dubai, Sharjah, Abudhabi, Ajman, Alain, Fujeira, Ras Al Khaima, Umm Al Quwain., UAE, buy cytotec in Dubai– Where I can buy abortion pills in Dubai,+971582071918where I can buy abortion pills in Abudhabi +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Sharjah,+97158207191 8where I can buy abortion pills in Ajman, +971)581248768 where I can buy abortion pills in Umm al Quwain +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Fujairah +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Ras al Khaimah +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Alain+971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in UAE +971)581248768 we are providing cytotec 200mg abortion pill in dubai, uae.Medication abortion offers an alternative to Surgical Abortion for women in the early weeks of pregnancy. Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman
Independent Study - College of Wooster Research (2023-2024) FDI, Culture, Glo...AntoniaOwensDetwiler
"Does Foreign Direct Investment Negatively Affect Preservation of Culture in the Global South? Case Studies in Thailand and Cambodia."
Do elements of globalization, such as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), negatively affect the ability of countries in the Global South to preserve their culture? This research aims to answer this question by employing a cross-sectional comparative case study analysis utilizing methods of difference. Thailand and Cambodia are compared as they are in the same region and have a similar culture. The metric of difference between Thailand and Cambodia is their ability to preserve their culture. This ability is operationalized by their respective attitudes towards FDI; Thailand imposes stringent regulations and limitations on FDI while Cambodia does not hesitate to accept most FDI and imposes fewer limitations. The evidence from this study suggests that FDI from globally influential countries with high gross domestic products (GDPs) (e.g. China, U.S.) challenges the ability of countries with lower GDPs (e.g. Cambodia) to protect their culture. Furthermore, the ability, or lack thereof, of the receiving countries to protect their culture is amplified by the existence and implementation of restrictive FDI policies imposed by their governments.
My study abroad in Bali, Indonesia, inspired this research topic as I noticed how globalization is changing the culture of its people. I learned their language and way of life which helped me understand the beauty and importance of cultural preservation. I believe we could all benefit from learning new perspectives as they could help us ideate solutions to contemporary issues and empathize with others.
Abhay Bhutada, the Managing Director of Poonawalla Fincorp Limited, is an accomplished leader with over 15 years of experience in commercial and retail lending. A Qualified Chartered Accountant, he has been pivotal in leveraging technology to enhance financial services. Starting his career at Bank of India, he later founded TAB Capital Limited and co-founded Poonawalla Finance Private Limited, emphasizing digital lending. Under his leadership, Poonawalla Fincorp achieved a 'AAA' credit rating, integrating acquisitions and emphasizing corporate governance. Actively involved in industry forums and CSR initiatives, Abhay has been recognized with awards like "Young Entrepreneur of India 2017" and "40 under 40 Most Influential Leader for 2020-21." Personally, he values mindfulness, enjoys gardening, yoga, and sees every day as an opportunity for growth and improvement.
2. Project partners in 2012-2013:
Event partner in 2013:
This brochure provides information about the OECD Project on
Institutional Investors and Long-term Investment. It covers the
first two years of activity following the launch of the project in
February 2012.
3. Institutional investors such as pension funds, insurers and sovereign wealth funds, due to the longer
term nature of their liabilities, represent a potentially major source of long-term financing for illiquid
assets such as infrastructure. Over the last decade, these investors have been looking for new sources
of long-term, inflation protected returns. Asset allocation trends observed in recent years show a gradual
globalisation of portfolios with an increased interest in emerging markets and diversification into new
asset classes.
The crisis has had a lasting impact on the fund management
industry and on the long-term asset allocation strategies of
institutional investors. On the one hand, it has promoted more
cautious investment strategies and a greater focus on portfolio
risk management. On the other hand, the prolonged low-yield
environment has heightened the need for return-enhancing
strategies, pushing some investors to invest in alternative assets.
The willingness of institutional investors and the private sector
more in general to finance major investment projects in any given
country is heavily influenced by the perceptions of a country’s
investment climate and the broad suite of policy settings and
institutions that underpin a country’s economy and political
processes. Through structural reforms, governments need
to create a more favourable investment climate, build private
sector confidence to invest and ensure that global savings are
channelled into productive investments.
The role of institutional investors in long-term financing is also constrained by the short-termism
increasingly pervasive in capital markets as well as structural and policy barriers such as regulatory
disincentives, lack of appropriate financing vehicles, limited investment and risk management
expertise, transparency, viability issues and a lack of appropriate data and investment benchmarks for
illiquid assets.
Moving from the current mind-set to a longer-term investment environment requires a transformational
change in both government and investor behaviours. Promotion of a public-private dialogue ensuring
a co-ordinated approach between investors, the financial industry and the public sector will be a key
element in developing this new “investment culture”.
The OECD is ideally placed to do this. Partnering with some of the largest institutional investors in
the world, the OECD has developed an ambitious project on “Institutional Investors and Long-term
Investment”. Through this project and its large network of investors and private sector representatives,
the OECD aims to provide a platform for dialogue about long-term investment issues amongst
international forums such as the G20 and APEC.
Preface
Rintaro Tamaki, OECD Chief Economist and Deputy Secretary-General
5. 3
At the OECD we have been conducting analysis on institutional investors for many years based on our
large network of financial authorities in charge of institutional investors. The OECD project on “Institutional
Investors and Long-term Investment” was launched in February 2012 to consolidate previous work
and help broaden policy makers’ knowledge and understanding of institutional investors’ needs and
challenges so that supportive legislation and regulation can be drafted and enforced where relevant.
In order to make this happen, institutional investors needed to be
brought into the debate with policy makers. This is why the OECD
decided to engage with some of the largest investors across the
world, creating a network of institutions actively collaborating
on our research and participating in events. Institutions already
partnering with the OECD include the Canadian pension fund
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, the Club of Long-
Term Investors, the Dutch pension fund asset manager APG,
Guggenheim Partners and Oliver Wyman.
Building on this dialogue with investors and financial
authorities, 2013/14 highlights include:
n Development of the G20/OECD High-level Principles on
Long-term Investment Financing by Institutional Investors,
endorsed at the G20 summit, St Petersburg;
Taking the research
and policy agenda forward
n G20/OECD High-level Roundtable on Institutional Investors and Long-term
Investment, Paris, 28 May 2013;
n OECD/Euromoney Infrastructure Summit, Paris, 29 May 2013;
n APEC/OECD Seminar on Institutional Investors and Infrastructure Investment,
Palembang, Indonesia, 29 August 2013;
n Significant contributions to different G20 initiatives such as the OECD report on
the pooling of institutional investors’ capital, the OECD survey on large pension
funds, the work on the High-level Principles, and developing a checklist for self-
assessment by governments of their long-term investment initiatives;
n Data collection on institutional investors and practical research on issues relating
to long-term investment. Data is already being collected from 86 large investors
who in total manage nearly USD 10 trillion in assets.
Much more can be done to promote further involvement by institutional investors in long-term
investments. The OECD is providing numerous contributions to the G20 and APEC, taking a clear
leadership on issues relating to institutional investors. This will call for further data and analysis on the
various obstacles to long-term investment by institutional investors and the development of related
policy recommendations. We welcome collaboration from investors and interested parties on this
important project.
André Laboul, Head, OECD Financial Affairs Division
6. 4
Long-term investment is important because:
n Patient capital allows investors to access
illiquidity premia, lowers turnover, encourages
less pro-cyclical investment strategies and
therefore a higher net investment rate of
returns, and greater financial stability;
n Engaged capital encourages active voting
policies, leading to better corporate
governance; and
n Productive capital supports infrastructure
development, green growth initiatives, SME
financing, etc., leading to sustainable growth.
The OECD Project on Institutional Investors and
Long-term Investment (the project) aims to facil-
itate long-term investment (LTI) by institutional
investors such as pension funds, insurance com-
panies, and sovereign wealth funds, addressing
both potential regulatory obstacles and market
failures. The project relies on close co-operation
between OECD economies, some non-OECD
economies, including G20 and APEC members,
major investors, and other key stakeholders.
Engaging institutional investors and policy mak-
ers will ultimately enable the OECD to develop
effective policy recommendations at the highest
political level.
Work on the project is organised in a series of
modules such as data collection, governance,
regulation and real assets (i.e. infrastructure).
The project looks at both long-term investors (i.e.
how institutional investors can be encouraged to
act in their long-term capacity, providing stable,
counter-cyclical financing and acting as engaged
shareholders) and long-term investments (i.e. how
to finance infrastructure and other real assets,
given the constraints in government, corporate
and financial sector balance sheets).
The OECD project on institutional investors
and long-term investment
On institutional investment, expertise and
oversight is provided through the G20/OECD Task
Force on Institutional Investors and Long-term
Financing, as well as the OECD Insurance and
Private Pensions Committee and the Committee
on Financial Markets. The project also benefits
from input from other international bodies such
as the World Bank, IMF, FSB, UN, IOPS, IAIS,
and IOSCO, access to the OECD databases of
pensions and insurance statistics, and collabo-
ration with an extensive network of institutional
investors.
Data collection
on institutional
investors
Infrastructure
and green investment
Regulation Governance
Emerging
markets
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
PROJECT DELIVERABLES
Data
collection
Policy
analysis
Events
Building on existing OECD databases to
monitor and analyse institutional investors’
asset allocation on a micro level directly
from institutional investors (data on assets,
flows, performance, etc.) with a specific
focus on alternative investments such as
infrastructure.
Detailed and practical research on
institutional investors and LTI issues
(infrastructure and green investment,
regulation, governance and emerging
markets) which will ultimately lead to the
formulation of policy recommendations.
.
Operational-level events, either managed
by the OECD or co-organised with partners,
engage institutional investors and policy-
makers (governments, regulators) on
relevant issues; high-level policy events
(CEOs/Ministers) present research results
and generate support for recommendations
(i.e. G20/B20).
7. 5
“The fallout from financial crisis has exposed
the limitations of relying on traditional sources
of long-term investment finance such as banks.
Governments are looking for other sources of
funds to support the long-term projects that are
essential to sustaining a dynamic economy.
There is huge potential among institutional
investors to support development in a range of
areas such as infrastructure, new technology
and small businesses.
” Angel Gurría, OECD Secretary-General
G20 Leaders’ Summit, St Petersburg, September 2013
8. 6
“…it is important to bear in mind the difficulties in implementing the Principles and putting
the various proposals into practice. This will require substantial further work and integration
of effort across governments, supranational bodies such as the OECD, asset managers and
of course, institutional investors.
”Chris Hitchen, Chief Executive, Railway Pension Investments Limited, Consultation on the G20/OECD High-level Principles, 2013
Engaging in the policy discussion
G20-OECD work on long-term financing
G20 leaders have highlighted the importance of long-term financing, in particular infrastructure
investment, to foster long-term growth and this a top priority of the Australian G20 presidency in 2014.
Meeting in Moscow on 15-16 February 2013, G20 ministers welcomed diagnostic reports by inter-
national organisations assessing factors affecting long-term financing. The OECD contributed a report
titled “The Role of Banks, Equity Markets and Institutional Investors in Long-Term Financing for Growth
and Development”. At that time, several international organisations were given mandates and the OECD
was asked to:
n Develop G20/OECD High-level Principles on Long-term Investment
Financing by Institutional Investors, subsequently endorsed by G20
Leaders in September 2013;
n Conduct an Annual Survey of Large Pension Funds and Public Pension
Reserve Funds, circulated to G20 leaders in October 2013;
n Prepare an analysis of different government and market-based
instruments and incentives used for stimulating the financing of long-
term investment.
G20 leaders endorsing the High-level Principles called on the OECD and other interested participants
to identify approaches for their implementation by the next summit. In addition to the implementation
of the Principles in 2014, the OECD is taking the lead on six further reports to the G20 on various
aspects of the investment agenda and providing contributions to five reports led by other international
organisations.
9. 7
The G20/OECD High-level Principles on Long-term Investment Financing by Institutional Investors were
developed throughout 2013 by the G20/OECD Task Force on Institutional Investors and Long-term
Financing. The Task Force operates under the aegis of the OECD Committee on Financial Markets and the
OECD Insurance and Private Pensions Committee. The Task Force is open to governmental experts from
OECD and selected non-OECD countries, including G20, FSB and APEC governmental members. The Task
Force is currently following up on the call by G20 Leaders to identify approaches to the implementation of
the High-level Principles.
The G20/OECD High-level Principles on Long-term Investment Financing by
Institutional Investors:
n Identify the preconditions for long-term investment, including a favourable business and
investment climate, stable macroeconomic conditions, regulatory stability, adequate cost benefit
analysis, and opportunities for public-private partnerships.
n Address the need to promote long-term savings and institutional investors through savings
mobilisation policies.
n Call for strengthened governance of institutional investors, providing the right incentives for a
long-term investment perspective and ensuring that the governing body has the necessary skills
to manage and oversee long-term investments, including their associated risks.
n Set out basic objectives for financial and tax regulation, such as avoiding incentives for
pro-cyclical investment strategies and facilitating international investment.
n Set out the basic preconditions for public intervention in long-term investment projects and
highlight the role of national development banks and multilateral development agencies in
supporting long-term investment financing.
n Refer to the need for better information sharing and disclosure to facilitate long-term
investment by institutional investors as well as a stronger emphasis on financial education
and consumer protection.
10. 8
The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) has
grown to become one of the world’s most important
regional forums. Its 21 member economies are
home to more than 2.7 billion people and represent
approximately 53% of world real GDP and 44% of
world trade.
Long-term investment, in particular infrastructure
investment, was one of the main priorities of the
APEC Indonesian presidency in 2013 and is of high
importance for the Chinese presidency in 2014.
When APEC Finance Ministers welcomed the G20/
OECD High-level Principles at their September 2013
meeting in Bali, they asked the OECD to join the
new APEC PPP (Public Private Partnership) Experts
Advisory Panel, one of the main initiatives of the
Indonesian presidency.
Under the aegis of the APEC, the OECD organised a
Seminar on Infrastructure Financing in Palembang,
Indonesia, on 29 August 2013.
An APEC Seminar on long-term and stable financing for
infrastructure development co-hosted by the Chinese
Ministry of Finance will be organised in June 2014 in
Dalian, Liaoning China.
APEC-OECD work on
long-term financing
11. 9
Private financing and government support to
promote long term investments in infrastructure –
Report for G20 (forthcoming 2014)
This report presents an overview of the different
types of public assistance to private investors in
infrastructure and of the new instruments and
techniques that financial markets have developed
in response to the recent financial and sovereign
debt crisis. The report is part of a wider project on the
analysis of different government and market-based
instruments and incentives used for stimulating the
financing of long-term investment.
Pooling of institutional investors capital:
Selected case studies in unlisted equity
infrastructure - Report for G20 (2014)
This paper aims to clarify some of the issues as-
sociated with the evolving field of infrastructure in-
vestment and highlights some of the new models
that are being used to facilitate the flow of financing.
The paper describes new initiatives that have been
developed in response to drawbacks and early inef-
ficiencies, highlighting specific case studies of co-
investment platforms, government-led initiatives and
revised unlisted infrastructure funds that are provid-
ing opportunities for institutional investors interested
in investing in unlisted equity infrastructure assets.
Long-term finance for investment: Institutional
investment and infrastructure finance in Indonesia
(forthcoming 2014)
Indonesia, like other Asian emerging market econ-
omies, plans to accelerate investment in infra-
structure sharply in the coming years and to finance
a large share of that investment through the financial
markets. This report analyses the capability of the
Indonesian financial system to support the projected
high level of investment in infrastructure, stressing the
key role of institutional investors and capital markets.
Research and data
Institutional investors and infrastructure financing
(2013)
This paper seeks to identify the main trends in
long-term financial intermediation focusing on the
role of institutional investors in providing long-term
finance for growth and development. It highlights
infrastructure as one specific sector that is facing
major challenges in long-term financing.
Annual survey of large pension funds and
public pension reserve funds: Pension funds’ long-
term investments - Report for G20 (2013)
This survey illustrates the role that large institutional
investors can play in providing a source of stable
long-term capital. The survey reviews trends in
assets and asset allocation by 86 large pension
funds and Public Pension Reserve Funds, which in
total manage nearly USD 10 trillion in assets, more
than one third of the total worldwide assets held by
this class of institutional investors.
Pension fund investment in infrastructure:
A comparison between Australia and Canada
(2013)
This paper compares and contrasts the experience
of institutional investors in Australia and Canada
looking at factors such as infrastructure policies,
the pension system, investment strategies and
governance of pension funds. Australian pension
funds have been pioneers in this field since the early
1990s, and their financial industry invented the label
‘infrastructure investing’ as such. The Canadian
pension funds are often held as some of the world’s
leading infrastructure investors, especially for their
‘Canadian model’ of direct investing.
12. 10
Long-term investment, the cost of capital and the
dividend and buyback puzzle (2013)
The paper argues that interest rates are at extremely
low levels to support banks, and the search for yield
has pushed the liquidity driven speculative bubble
from real estate, derivatives and structured products
markets into the corporate debt market.
The role of banks, equity markets and institutional
investors in long-term financing for growth and
development - Report for G20 (2013)
This report identifies the main trends in long-term
financial intermediation focusing on the role of
institutional investors in providing long-term finance
for growth and development. It also highlights
infrastructure as one specific sector that is facing
major challenges in long-term financing.
The effect of solvency regulations and accounting
standards on long-term investing: Implications for
insurers and pension funds (2012)
This report reviews recent accounting and
regulatory changes as well as a summary of the
evidence gathered to date of their impact on long-
term investing. It describes recent trends in asset
allocation by pension funds and insurers across the
OECD and identifies instances where the regulatory
framework – particularly solvency rules – may have
an effect on investment decisions.
Trends in large pension fund investment
in infrastructure (2012)
This paper is based on a survey of some of the
largest pension funds across different regions,
accounting for over USD 7 trillion of assets under
management. It looks at how much these investors
have allocated to infrastructure, what is considered
as infrastructure, where infrastructure fits in the total
portfolio allocation, the approaches and forms of
investment that have been taken, and recent trends
in relation to infrastructure and asset allocation,
regulation and green investment.
Global imbalances and the development of capital
flows among Asian countries (2012)
Against a backdrop of huge potential demands for
infrastructure investment in the Asian region, this
note makes recommendations to help develop
bond markets in Asia. It also makes proposals for
facilitating the financial inclusion of SMEs which
outnumber other types of business in Asia.
Infrastructure investment in new markets:
Challenges and opportunities for pension funds
(2012)
This report reviews the existing evidence on pension
funds’ investment in infrastructure in “new” markets,
including countries such as Brazil, Chile, China,
India, Indonesia, Mexico and South Africa. The
report examines the role of both domestic and
foreign pension funds in infrastructure investment
and provides a set of policy recommendations to
facilitate such investments.
13. 11
Comparing pension
fund investment
in infrastructure
in Australia
and Canada
Many governments have decided to encourage private in-
vestment in infrastructure to bridge the infrastructure gap.
Private sector participation can bring additional capital but
also end-user benefits from a more competitive environment
in the form of lower costs, as well as the use of the private
sector’s technological and managerial competences in the
public interest.
Yet at the same time, a number of failed public-private part-
nerships in infrastructure sectors demonstrate the challenges
facing policy makers. Infrastructure investment involves con-
tracts and regulatory frameworks which are more complex
and of longer duration than in most other parts of the economy,
operated under the double imperative of ensuring financial
sustainability and meeting user needs and social objectives.
The challenges are even more acute when governments bring
in institutional investors, such as pension funds, whose first
responsibility is to provide adequate retirement income for
their members. Infrastructure investments will only be made
if investors are able to earn adequate risk-adjusted returns
and if appropriate market structures are in place to access
this capital.
Pension fund investment in infrastructure: A comparison
between Australia and Canada compares and contrasts the
experience of Australian and Canadian pension funds which
have been pioneers in infrastructure investing since the early
1990s. These countries also have the highest asset allocation
to infrastructure around the globe today. Important lessons
can be learnt not only by investors but also by policy makers as
political and regulatory stability are paramount for long-term
investment strategies.
14. 12
The OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs and the Environment Directorate have been
investigating how institutional investors have been involved in green initiatives and how to better engage
investors in green infrastructure investments.
Reports relating to green growth published to date include:
G20/OECD policy note on pension fund financing for green infrastructure and initiatives (2012)
Pension funds represent a potential source of financing for long-term, green growth infrastructure. This
policy note examines existing barriers and problems and puts forward proposals that policy makers may
wish to consider when addressing the financing of green initiatives.
Institutional investors and green infrastructure investments: Selected case studies (2013)
The report examines the channels through which institutional investors can access green infrastructure,
assesses the extent to which this is happening, and identifies barriers to scaling up these investment flows.
Four case studies present utility-scale solar PV power generation in the United States, sustainable agriculture
in Brazil, off-shore wind energy in the United Kingdom, and the securitisation of on-shore wind farms in
Germany and France.
Institutional investors and green growth
15. 13
The role of institutional investors in financing clean energy (2012)
Even if governments were to improve the coherence and ambition of their climate policies, they cannot
assume that capital will flow in the quantities needed and in the timeframe required. There are aspects of the
investment environment that also need to be improved if clean energy is going to be an attractive proposition
for some of the large pools of capital managed by institutional investors.
Defining and measuring green investment (2012)
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the concepts and definitions related to green investments
currently in use. This research does not take a position on a specific definition but rather explores what is
being generally used, identifying commonalities, inconsistencies and lessons to be drawn. The paper also
examines how green investments are defined across different asset classes and provides some estimates
of the size of these investments.
The role of pension funds in financing green growth initiatives (2011)
This paper examines some of the initiatives currently under way around the world to assist and encourage
pension funds to help finance green growth projects. It informs current OECD work on engaging the private
sector in financing green growth. Different financing mechanisms are outlined, and suggestions made as to
the role governments in general, and pension fund regulatory and supervisory authorities in particular, can
play in supporting pension funds investment in this sector.
16. 14
This OECD survey illustrates the role that large
institutional investors can play in providing a source
of stable long-term capital. The survey reviews
trends in assets and asset allocation by 86 large
pension funds and Public Pension Reserve Funds
(PPRFs), which in total manage nearly USD 10 trillion
in assets, more than one third of the total worldwide
assets held by this class of institutional investors.
Both pension funds and PPRFs exhibit similar asset
allocation trends: decreasing equities, increasing
fixed income and increasing alternatives/other over
the last two years. Based on a group of 46 pension
funds that populated data in both the 2010 and 2012
time periods, there is evidence that allocations to
alternative asset classes, such as infrastructure and
private equity, are slowly increasing.
Large pension fund survey
The survey results show a still low level of investment
in infrastructure on average among the surveyed
funds, despite evidence of a growing interest by
pension fund managers. This seems to confirm the
existence of considerable barriers and disincentives
which limit such investments and the relevance
and need for policy makers to address them. If
we consider total assets under management for
the complete survey (i.e. 69 funds), infrastructure
investment in the form of unlisted equity and debt
was USD 72.1 billion in 2012, representing 0.9%
of the total assets under management of the
surveyed funds.
Thirty three pension funds reported an allocation
to unlisted infrastructure equity. Total investment
in unlisted infrastructure equity at the end of 2012
was USD 64.0 billion, which represented 3% of total
assets of these funds. In 2011, this amount was
USD 55 billion, which corresponds to a nominal
increase of 16.5% but a status quo when reported
as a ratio to total assets1
. However, some funds have
ramped up their direct infrastructure exposures.
Notably, Australia’s Future Fund increased its
total portfolio allocations to unlisted equity by
0.8 percentage points. Among pension funds,
FUNCEF increased the infrastructure allocation by
2.3 percentage points. Still, the room for manoeuvre
for most pension funds is still very large and there
are clear opportunities for further increase in pension
funds’ investment in infrastructure.
The survey shows that data on long-term investment
– and in particular infrastructure investment – by
pension funds is readily available from the funds
themselves. However, the methodologies and
definitions used to classify such investments can
differwidely,renderingcomparisonsandaggregation
difficult. There is clearly a need to standardise
definitions and classifications to facilitate monitoring.
The survey was welcomed by G20 Finance Ministers
and Central Bank Governors in 2013.
1
Figures may be understated given that for fixed income the majority of the funds do not report such details on their alloca-
tion and infrastructure unlisted equity is often included in other asset classes. Some funds also report their allocation to infra-
structure through listed equity (i.e. infrastructure corporates), that for this survey, we have considered as indirect exposure.
Fixed income and cash
56%
Fixed income and cash
60%
Listed equity
28%
Listed equity
27%
Unlisted infrastructure
investment1
1%
Unlisted infrastructure
investment1
1%
Other alternative investments
15%
Other alternative investments
12%
Large Pension Funds
Public Pension Reserve Funds
FIGURE 1. AVERAGE ASSET ALLOCATION OF LARGE PENSION FUNDS
(LPFs) AND PUBLIC PENSION RESERVE FUNDS (PPRFs), 2012
1 The value is a simple average of the share invested in unlisted infrastructure
investments for all LPFs (respectively PPRFs) for which actual asset allocation
was available in 2012, independently of their size in terms of assets.
Source: OECD.
17. 15
“There is a general need to enlarge the worldwide share of
financing for long-term capital investment at the expense of
short-termism and speculation... ...long-term investment is
crucial for the future of the world economy; and it could also
play a positive role in financial market stability. A long-term vision
is needed to tackle the major challenges facing our societies:
climate change, scarce natural resources, environmental
protection, poverty, immigration, and education.
” Franco Bassanini, Chairman Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, OECD High-level Financial Roundtable, Paris 2011
18. 16
TABLE 1. LARGE PENSION FUNDS SURVEYED (USD BILLION)1
Country Name of the fund or institution Assets 2012
Netherlands Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP (ABP) 412,4
United States California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) 248,8
Singapore Central Provident Fund2
190,2
Netherlands Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW) 171,0
United States California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS)2,3
151,3
South Africa Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) 143,7
Denmark Arbejdsmarkedets Tillægspension (ATP)2
140,2
Japan Pension Fund Association4
130,8
United States New York City Combined Retirement System 130,0
Canada Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board (OTPP) 127,9
United States Florida Retirement System Pension Plan2,3
122,7
Sweden Alecta 83,9
Brazil Previ 81,4
United States Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) 80,4
Netherlands Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek (PMT) 62,0
Canada Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) 61,8
United Kingdom BT Pension Scheme 58,6
United Kingdom Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) 55,5
Australia AustralianSuper 54,6
United States Massachusetts PRIM Board 51,8
Denmark PFA Pension 51,7
Finland Keva2
46,3
Chile AFP Provida 45,8
United Nations United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund 44,7
Finland Ilmarinen 38,9
Chile AFP Cuprum 33,3
Brazil Petros2
32,6
Australia UniSuper2,3
31,1
Brazil Fundação dos Economiários Federais (FUNCEF) 24,5
Australia Sunsuper 22,5
France Établissement de Retraite Additionnelle de la Fonction
Publique (ERAFP)
19,5
Mexico Afore XXI Banorte 18,9
Germany BASF Pensionskasse 15,4
Israel Menora-Mivtachim 12,4
Italy COMETA 9,7
Peru AFP Horizonte Peru 9,0
Turkey Ordu Yardımlasma Kurumu (OYAK) 8,8
Italy FONCHIM 5,0
Russia Lukoil - Garant 4,5
Spain Fonditel 4,5
Brazil Fundação de Assistência e Previdência Social do BNDES
(FAPES)
4,3
Nigeria RSA Fund5
4,2
Portugal CGD Pensões 2,1
Spain Previsión Social, Empleados del Grupo Endesa, f.p. (Endesa) 1,8
Nigeria CPF Fund5
1,6
more than
direct infrastructure investment
of pension funds in OECD countries
surveyed in 2012
Assets managed by
institutional investors
in OECD countries in 2012
22USD TRILLION22
83USD TRILLION
Assets managed by
pension funds
in OECD countries in 2012
1USD TRILLION
New capital inflows
to pension funds
in OECD countries in 2012
1/3of total pension fund
assets worldwide
The 86 pension funds
in the survey account for
more than
in OECD countries in 2012
22USD TRILLION22Assets managed by
pension funds
in OECD countries in 2012
1USD TRILLION
New capital inflows
to pension funds
in OECD countries in 2012
1/3of total pension fund
assets worldwide
The 86 pension funds
in the survey account for
19. 17
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Pension funds
USD 21.8 tn
Insurance companies
USD 24.5 tn
Investment funds
USD 30.0 tn
PPRFs1
USD 5.0 tn
Other2
USD 1.9 tn
2001 2002
USD TRILLIONS
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
PPRFs = Public Pension Reserve Funds.
Note: Book reserves are not included in this chart. Pension funds and insurance companies’ assets include assets invested in
mutual funds, which may be also counted in investment funds.
1
Data include Australia’s Future Fund, Belgium’s Zilverfonds (2008-2012), Canada’s Pension Plan Investment Board, Chile’s
Pension Reserve Fund (2010-2012), France’s Pension Reserve Fund (2003-2012), Ireland‘s National Pensions Reserve
Fund, Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund, Korea’s National Pension Service (OECD estimate for 2012), New
Zealand’s Superannuation Fund, Norway’s Government Pension Fund, Poland’s Demographic Reserve Fund, Portugal’s
Social Security Financial Stabilisation Fund, Spain’s Social Security Reserve Fund, Sweden’s AP1-AP4 and AP6, United
States’ Social Security Trust Fund.
2
Other forms of institutional savings include foundations and endowment funds, non-pension fund money managed by
banks, private investment partnership and other forms of institutional investors.
Source: OECD Global Pension Statistics, Global Insurance Statistics and Institutional Investors databases, and
OECD estimates.
FIGURE 2. TOTAL ASSETS BY TYPE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR IN THE OECD, 2001-2012
TABLE 1. LARGE PENSION FUNDS SURVEYED (USD BILLION)1
Country Name of the fund or institution Assets 2012
Spain Fondo de Pensiones de Empleados de Bankia (Bankia) 1,3
Portugal Banco BPI Pension Fund 1,2
Russia VTB 1,2
Nigeria AES Fund (5) 0,7
Portugal Fundo de Pensões Petrogal (Petrogal) 0,4
Spain Santander Empleados Pensiones, FP (Santander) 0,1
Portugal Fundo de Pensões Pessoal da Império-Bonança
(Império-Bonança)
0,1
Portugal Fundo de Pensões Fidelidade (Fidelidade) 0,1
Portugal Fundo de Pensões do Pessoal da Mundial Confiança
(Mundial Confiança)
0,0
Portugal Fundo de Pensões Galp Energia (Galp Energia) 0,0
Spain Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) 0,0
Total 3 057,3
1
Data correspond to all forms of investment with a value associated to a pension fund/plan.
2
Data have been gathered from publicly available reports.
3
Data refer to the end of June.
4
Data refer to the end of March.
5
In Nigeria, there are three types of pension schemes, namely, the Retirement Savings Account (RSA)
Fund, which is contributory; the Closed Pension Funds; and the Approved Existing Schemes (AES).
The largest pension fund from each of these three schemes has been selected.
Source: OECD.
1%Less than
more than
Allocations to
direct infrastructure investment
of pension funds in OECD countries
surveyed in 2012
Assets managed by
institutional investors
in OECD countries in 2012
22USD TRILLION22
83USD TRILLION
Assets managed by
pension funds
in OECD countries in 2012
1USD TRILLION
New capital inflows
to pension funds
in OECD countries in 2012
1/3of total pension fund
assets worldwide
The 86 pension funds
in the survey account for
20. 18
“Almost every country has an infrastructure deficit and is
struggling to finance the infrastructure it needs. Worldwide, the
OECD estimates that over $50 trillion in infrastructure investment
is needed by 2030. It should be easier to get infrastructure
projects off the ground – and we can do that through attracting
more private capital into them through sensible pricing policies
and better regulatory practices. My hope is to bring policy-makers,
financiers and builders together to identify practical ways to
increase long-term infrastructure financing.
”
Tony Abbott, Prime Minister of Australia, World Economic Forum, Davos 2014
21. TABLE 2. PUBLIC PENSION RESERVE FUNDS SURVEYED (USD BILLION)1
Country Name of the fund or institution Assets 2012
United States Social Security Trust Fund 2 732,3
Japan Government Pension Investment Fund 1 298,1
Norway Government Pension Fund–Global2
694,4
Saudi Arabia General Organisation for Social Insurance3,4
448,0
Korea National Pension Service3,5
302,9
China National Social Security Fund5
175,9
Canada Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) 173,6
Sweden National Pension Funds (AP1-AP4 and AP6) 147,0
India Employees' Provident Fund Organisation5,6
106,7
Russian Federation National Wealth Fund5,7
88,6
Australia Future Fund 85,7
Spain Social Security Reserve Fund 83,1
France AGIRC - ARRCO3,5
65,7
Argentina Sustainability Guarantee Fund 50,0
France Pension Reserve Fund5
47,9
Canada Quebec Pension Plan 39,3
Norway Government Pension Fund–Norway 27,8
Belgium Zilverfonds 25,3
Ireland National Pensions Reserve Fund5
19,4
New Zealand New Zealand Superannuation Fund 17,2
Portugal Social Security Financial Stabilisation Fund 14,4
Indonesia Jamsostek8
14,1
Chile Pension Reserve Fund 5,9
Poland Demographic Reserve Fund 5,3
Mexico IMSS Reserve 1,6
Bosnia and Herzegovina The Pension Reserve Fund of Republic of Srpska 0,2
Total 6 670,2
1
Data correspond to all forms of investment with a value associated to a pension fund/plan.
2
Norway's Government Pension Fund–Global is a Sovereign Wealth Fund and not a Public Pension
Reserve Fund, its mandate goes beyond financing pension expenditures.
3
Data refer to 2011.
4
Source: Asset international's Chief Investment Officer (aiCIO).
5
Data have been gathered from publicly available reports.
6
Data refer to March 2012, and include the Employees Provident Fund, the Employees Pension
Fund and the Employees Deposit Linked Insurance Fund.
7
Russia's National Wealth Fund is a Sovereign Wealth Fund, and not a Public Pension Reserve
Fund, because its mandate goes beyond financing pension expenditures.
8
The number is available on Jamsostek's webpage and refers to November 2012.
Source: OECD and various national sources.
more than
in OECD countries in 2012
1USD TRILLION
New capital inflows
to pension funds
in OECD countries in 2012
1/3of total pension fund
assets worldwide
The 86 pension funds
in the survey account for
23. 21
OECD-Risklab-APG workshop on pension fund regulation
and long-term investment
7 April 2014,
Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
Focus: long-term pension investment strategies
under risk-based regulation; risk and pro-cyclicality
in pension asset allocation; and regulatory
challenges for long-term illiquid assets.
Participants: international investment, technical
experts, regulatory bodies.
ADBI-OECD roundtable on capital market reform in Asia
13-14 March 2014,
Tokyo, Japan
Focus: implications of quantitative easing (QE)
tapering to Asia; global financial regulatory reforms;
financial liberalisation in the de-globalisation
phase; long-term investment for infrastructure
development; and, disaster risk financing and the
evolving role of insurance and financial markets.
Participants: regulators, policy makers, experts,
practitioners, scholars and international
organisations.
OECD Workshop on infrastructure investment and credit risk
4 December 2013,
Paris, France
Focus: the reliance of the pension fund sector on
credit rating agencies.
Participants: pensions funds and credit rating
agencies.
APEC-OECD-Indonesia seminar on institutional investors
and infrastructure financing in Indonesia
29 August 2013,
Palembang,
Indonesia
Focus: infrastructure financing in Indonesia.
Participants: representatives from the Indonesian
government and central bank, local and
international investors.
Events and highlights from selected events
Since the launch of the project in early 2012, the OECD has organised,
or co-organised with partners, close to 30 events. This page lists a
number of these events. A full list of events and related materials can
be found online at www.oecd.org/finance/lti.
Compiled list of speakers
from high-level events
Richard Abadie
Global Head, Capital Projects Infrastructure, PwC
Vedat Akgiray
Chairman, Capital Markets Board of Turkey
Irfa Ampri
Vice Chairman of Fiscal Policy Agency for Climate
Change Financing and Multilateral Policy,
Ministry of Finance, Indonesia
Pablo Antolín
Lead Economist, OECD
Nick Ashmore
Deputy Director, National Pensions Reserve Fund,
Ireland
Serkan Bahçeci
Ph.D. Executive Director, Head of Infrastructure
Research JP Morgan Asset Management
Michela Bariletti
Director, Standard Poor’s
Chris Barrett
Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Australia
to the OECD, Australia
Franco Bassanini
Chairman, Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, Italy
Johan Bastin
Chief Executive Officer, CapAsia, Singapore
Philippe Benaroya
Managing Director, Co-Head of European Infrastructure
Debt, BlackRock
Jean Bensaïd
Chief Executive Officer, CDC Infrastructure
Frédéric Blanc-Brude
Research Director, EDHEC Risk Institute-Asia
Adrian Blundell-Wignall
Special Advisor to the OECD Secretary-General on
Financial Markets and Deputy Director of the OECD
Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
Andrey A. Bokarev
Director, Department for International Financial
Relations, Ministry of Finance, Russian Federation
Christophe Bories
Head of International Financial System and Summits
Preparation Unit, Directorate-General of the Treasury,
Ministry of Finance, France
Rory Brennan
Director, Infrastructure Australia
P. Brett Hammond
Managing Director Chief Investment Officer,
TIAA-CREF
Marie Briere
Head of Investor Research Center, Amundi
24. 22
OECD roundtable on the investment strategies of insurers
and long-term Investment
6 June 2013,
Paris, France
Focus: off-the-record discussion on insurers as
long-term investors between OECD Committee
members and selected representatives from the
insurance sector.
Participants: OECD Insurance and Private Pension
Committee comprising officials from OECD
national regulators, finance ministries and other
financial authorities, who meet biannually to review
insurance sector related issues in OECD countries
and emerging economies.
OECD/Euromoney infrastructure summit
29 May 2013,
Paris, France
Focus: research related to infrastructure financing,
infrastructure as an asset class, project bonds
and debt, new models for infrastructure financing,
opportunities in renewable and emerging markets.
Participants: institutional investors, financial
industry representatives (banks, asset managers,
rating agencies), policy makers.
G20 Russian Presidency/OECD high-level roundtable on
long-term investment: from problems to solutions
28 May 2013,
Paris, France
Focus: research on long-term investment,
regulation, governance, infrastructure investment,
G20 deliverables.
Participants: senior representatives of pension
funds, insurers and SWFs and policy makers.
OECD roundtable on financing investment for the long-term:
challenges, players, instruments
25 April 2013,
Paris, France
Focus: off-the-record discussion on market and
regulatory challenges related to financing for
investment between OECD committee members
and selected representatives of the financial
services sector (banks and rating agencies).
Participants: High-level representatives of financial
firms and delegates of the OECD Committee on
Financial Markets comprising officials from central
banks, finance ministries and other financial
authorities.
Randy Brown
Managing Director and Global Head of Deutsche
Insurance Asset Management
Sharan Burrow
General Secretary, International Trade Union
Confederation (ITUC)
Toby Buscombe
Senior Alternative Asset Specialist, Mercer
Tim Cable
Director, Infrastructure Debt,
Hastings Funds Management
François Calonne
Counsellor, Directorate for Institutional Relations
and the European International Cooperation,
Groupe Caisse des Dépôts
Cosette V. Canilao
Executive Director, Public-Private Partnership Center
of the Philippines
Laurence Carter
Director, PPP Advisory Department, IFC
Richard Carter
Director, Business Environment, BIS, UK
Lim Chow Kiat
Managing Director and Group Chief Investment Officer
GIC, Singapore
Ross Clare
Director of Research, Association of Superannuation
Funds of Australia
Elizabeth Corley
Chief Executive Officer,
Allianz Global Investors, Germany
James Courtenay
Global Head, Infrastructure Finance and Advisory
Standard Chartered Bank
Philippe Danjou
Member of the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB)
Andrew Darling
Vice President, Infrastructure, Canada Pension Plan
Investment Board
Damian Darragh
Financial Managing Director, Terra Firma
Andrew Davison
Senior Vice President, Infrastructure Finance Group,
Moody’s
Dominique de Crayencour
Secretary General, Club of Long Term Investors
(Caisse des Dépôts/KfW)
Thierry Deau
Chief Executive Officer, Meridiam Infrastructure Fund
Raffaele Della Croce
Lead Manager, Institutional Investment and
Long-term Investment Project, OECD
Scott Dickens
Global Head of Structured Finance, HSBC
James J. Donelon
President, National Association of Insurance
Commissioners, USA
Ronnie Downes
Deputy Head of Division,
Budgeting and Public Expenditures, OECD
25. 23
Stefan Dunatov
Chief Investment Office, Coal Pension Trustees Ltd
Damien Dunn
Australian Treasury, Chair of the OECD Task Force
on Institutional Investors and Long-Term Financing
Christian Edelmann
Regional Head, Asia Pacific, Oliver Wyman
Richard Ensor
Chairman, Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC
Carolyn Ervin
Director, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
OECD
Dr. Zai Fan
Managing Director, China Investment Corporation (CIC)
Peter R. Fisher
Senior Managing Director, BlackRock
Hugo Garduño
Chief of Staff to the Deputy Secretary of Finance
and Public Credit, Mexico
François-Yves Gaudeul
Director, Infrastructure Debt, Allianz Global Investors
Ken Georgetti
President, Canadian Labour Congress
Kristina Gerteiser
Partner, Oliver Wyman
Benjamin Gilmartin
Associate Director, Infrastructure, HSBC
Jaime Gornsztejn
Director, Brazilian Development Bank – BNDES
Antoine Gosset-Grainville
Deputy Chief Executive Officer,
Groupe Caisse des Dépôts
Ian Greer
Managing Director, Standard Poor’s
Örn Greif
Head of Debt Business Development,
BNP Paris Securities Services
Georg Grodski
Head of Credit Research, Legal General
Steve Gross
Senior Managing Director, Macquarie Infrastructure
and Real Assets
Andin Hadiyanto
Advisor to the Minister of Finance of Indonesia,
and Alternate Chair of APEC Finance and Central Bank
Deputies Meeting
Jérôme Haegeli
Managing Director, Head of Investment Strategy,
Swiss Re
Claus-Michael Happe
Head of Division, Multilateral Development Banks
Ministry of Finance, Germany and Co-Chair of G20
Study Group on Long-Term Investment Financing
Scott Hartz
Executive Vice President of General Account
Investments Manulife Financial
Garry Hawker
Director of Strategic Research, Mercer
Brett Himbury
Chief Executive Officer, IFM Investors
OECD/ICC/ADB workshop on turning environmental infrastructure
proposals into reality
7-8 February 2013,
Paris, France
Focus: identifying good practices for enhancing
the soundness and bankability of infrastructure
projects in developing countries.
Participants: multilaterals, developers, international
investors, technical experts.
OECD/Allianz AM/RiskLab/APG seminar on regulation
and long-term investment
6 February 2013,
Amsterdam,
Netherlands
Focus: the definition of long-term investment and
long-term investors, evidence available, impact
on investment strategies of current regulatory
changes, in particular solvency.
Participants: international investors, technical
experts, regulatory bodies.
OECD/IOPS global forum on private pensions
23-24 October
2012,
Santiago, Chile
Focus: the pension industry in Latin America;
the cost and coverage of pension systems;
long-term investing and infrastructure; designing
default options; financial education and pensions
communication.
Participants: representatives from developed
and developing pension systems, business and
academia.
OECD high-level roundtable on long-term investment
23 May 2012,
Paris, France
Focus:: sustainable growth in an integrated world
economy; financing infrastructure projects and
the transition to a low carbon economy; improving
corporate governance to encourage long-term
investors.
Participants: senior representatives from the
government, business and finance communities.
OECD forum session on long-term investment
23 May 2012,
Paris, France
Focus: attracting long-term investment in cities,
a source of change and growth.
Participants: senior representatives from the
government, business and finance communities.
Second annual world pensions and investment forum
9 February 2012,
Paris, France
Focus: launch of the OECD long-term investment
project; allocating long-term assets and devising
investment solutions; the benefits of diversification
within an asset class.
Participants: senior representatives from
governments, pension funds, endowment and
sovereign wealth funds, researchers.
26. 24
G20/OECD High-level Roundtable on Long-term
Investment: From Problems to Solutions
28 May 2013, OECD Conference Centre, Paris, France
High-level government officials, institutional investors, regulators, trade
unions and representatives from international organisations and the
private sector met in Paris on 28 May 2013 to examine opportunities
and challenges in long-term investment. Participants discussed
policy measures and initiatives to address the constraints to long-
term investment by institutional investors identified by the OECD and
the G20.
Discussion summary and key messages
Session 1: Impact of Regulation of Institutional Investors
on Long-Term Financing
n Policy makers should carefully monitor the total impact
of regulation on long-term investment and consider
possible adverse effects, such as incentives for pro-
cyclical investment strategies by institutional investors.
n There is a need for a comprehensive and integral policy
approach including current and new financial markets
reforms, tax, accounting and corporate governance.
Policy reforms should tackle regulatory arbitrage by
companies, and ensure global implementation in a
predictable manner, while reflecting the differences in
development stages of countries.
n Regulatory reform should be calibrated to the specific
risk categories of institutional investors and needs to
consider the stage of development of capital markets
and the governance and risk management maturity
of institutional investors, as well as their expertise in
infrastructure investment.
Session 2: Governance of and by Institutional Investors and
the Investment Management Chain
n Greater transparency, along with a shorter investment
chain and better alignment between savers’ and
investors’ incentives can be a solution to the growing
short-termism in capital markets.
n For long-term investment, risk may not merely be
defined as volatility, but rather should be based on
longer-term metrics.
n Compensation should be in line with the investment
horizon, and hence focus on long-term performance.
n There is a need to rethink the fiduciary duty of
institutional investors in order to better inculcate a
long-term perspective.
Patrick Hoedjes
Director of Operations, EIOPA
Georg Inderst
Independent Adviser, Inderst Advisory
Mats Isaksson
Head, Corporate Affairs Division, OECD
Mark Johnson
Editor, Euromoney Conferences
Peter Johnston
Executive Director, Infrastructure
Hastings Funds Management
Olav Jones
Deputy Director General, Insurance Europe
Ross Jones
Former President, International Organisation
of Pension Supervisors
Jean-Pierre Jouyet
Chief Executive Officer, Groupe Caisse des Dépôts,
France
Li Junfeng
Director of the National Center for Climate Strategy
and International Cooperation, National Development
and Reform Commission, China
François Jurd de Girancourt
Partner, McKinsey and Company
Dr. Patrick Justen
Executive Director, J.P. Morgan Asset Management
Global Insurance Solutions
Scott E. Kalb
Executive Director, Sovereign Investor Institute
and Former Chief Investment Officer,
Korea Investment Corp.
John Kay
Economist and Author of the Kay Review
of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision Making,
United Kingdom
Christopher Kaminker
Economist, Environment Directorate, OECD
Dr. Masahiro Kawai
Former Dean and Chief Executive Officer, ADBI
Osamu Kawanishi
Senior Policy Analyst, Environment Directorate, OECD
Con Keating
Head of Research, Brighton Rock Group
Angelien Kemna
Chief Investment Officer, APG, The Netherlands
Clive Kerner
Chief Executive Officer, Clifford Capital
Niels Kortleve
Innovation Manager, PGGM
Peter Kraneveld
Independent Consultant
Tjerk Kroes
Director, Corporate Strategy and Policy, APG Barthold
Kuipers Principal Expert, EIOPA
André Laboul
Head, Financial Affairs Division, OECD
Michel Leduc
Senior Vice President,
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board
27. 25
“We recognize the scale of the challenge in
changing short-term attitudes and behaviours
that have become all too ingrained in business,
investment and society. We are not looking
at an immediate fix to the problem of short-
termism. This will take time, persistence and
commitment from all involved.
” Mark Wiseman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, 2013
28. 26
Kyungjik Lee
Head of Global Public Market Investment Division
National Pension Service, Korea
Trevor Lewis
Public-Private Partnership Specialist
Asian Development Bank
Matti Leppälä
Secretary General, CEO, PensionsEurope
Robin Li
Chief Investment Officer, Manulife Asset Management,
Asia
Ernesto Lopez Mozo
Chief Financial Officer, Ferrovial
Bertrand Loubieres
Head of Specialised Product Group, BNP Parisbas
Stefan Lundbergh
Head of Innovation, Cardano
Mark Machin
Senior Vice-President and Head of International
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board
Cledan Mandri-Perrot
Lead Infrastructure Finance Specialist, World Bank
Nicolás Merigó
Chief Executive Officer, Marguerite Adviser
Martin Merlin
Head of Financial Services Policy, Internal Markets
European Commission
Brigitte Miksa
Head of International Pensions, Allianz AM
Robert Milliner
Sherpa, B20 Australia
Scott Minerd
Global Chief Investment Officer, Guggenheim Partners
Patrick Mispagel
Associate Managing Director, Moody’s
Torben Möger Pedersen
Chief Executive Officer, PensionDanmark, Denmark
Mahmoud Mohieldin
Special Envoy for the President of the World Bank
Ashby Monk
Executive Director, Global Projects Centre
Stanford University
Cormac Murphy
Head of TENs and Infrastructure Division
European Investment Bank (EIB)
Nhlanhla Musa Nene
Deputy Minister of Finance, South Africa
Ian Nolan
Chief Investment Officer, UK Green Investment Bank
John O’Brien
Partner, Financial Strategy Group, Mercer
Makoto Okubo
General Manager, Nippon Life Insurance Company
John Oliphant
Chief Investment Officer, Government Employees
Pension Fund, South Africa
Chris Ostrowski
Head of Infrastructure, Euromoney Conferences
Session 3: Policy Incentives and Instruments for Investment in
Infrastructure by Institutional Investors
n Strong institutions and stable policy environments
are vital and governments need to ensure these as
preconditions for investment.
n Financial markets have a role to play through
securitisation, long dated bonds and swaps, and
foreign exchange markets.
n Credit enhancements in the form of guarantees from
national or supranational bodies can play an important
kick-starting role in driving infrastructure investment.
n Consider risk segregation in the different phases of
project, i.e. construction, development and operation.
Session 4: High-level Principles of Long-term Investment Financing
by Institutional Investors
n Long-term financing should be seen as the means
to an end and should be designed for the ultimate
users of any service, and not necessarily the financial
intermediaries.
n It is the role of governments to match the needs of their
economies with the needs of institutional investors.
n Long-term investment can take many forms besides
infrastructure (i.e. equipment manufacturing, real
estate).
n Long-term investing entails active ownership and value
investing in private and public markets, and tends to be
counter-cyclical.
n The OECD High-level Principles provide a key input
into the development of a sound policy environment for
guiding long-term investment.
n The OECD is to set up a formal consultative network of
institutional investors in response to the success of the
public consultation process for the High-level Principles.
29. 27
Pier Carlo Padoan
Minister of Economy and Finance, Italy;
former OECD Deputy Secretary-General
Hubert Pénot
Chief Investment Officer for EMEA, MetLife
Darrin Pickett
Portfolio Manager, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan
Evgeniy Pogrebnyak
Managing Director, Department for Strategic Analysis,
Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs
(Vnesheconombank)
Eduard Ponds
Head Research Innovation Pensions, APG
Jim Rasque
Policy Advisor, Prudential Regulation, Insurance Europe
Mark Rathbone
Asia Pacific Capital Projects and Infrastructure Leader,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Donald M. Raymond
Chief Investment Strategist, Senior Vice President
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Canada
Dima Rifai
Managing Partner, Paradigm Change Capital Partners
Andreas Reuss
Partner, IFA
Edoardo Reviglio
Chief Economist, Cassa depositi e prestiti (CDP), Italy
Aaron Russell-Davison
Global Head, Bond Syndication, Standard Chartered
Freddy Saragih
Director of Fiscal Risk Policy Office,
Ministry of Finance, Indonesia
John Saunders
Managing Director, Blackrock Inc., Hong Kong
Dr. Gerhard Scheuenstuhl
Managing Director, risklab GmbH
Christian Schmitt
Managing Director, risklab GmbH
Tokihiko Shimizu
Director General, Research Department
Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF), Japan
Zenko Shinoyoma
Director, Infrastructure Finance Group
Japan Bank for International Cooperation
Michael Siegel
Managing Director, Global Head
GSAM Insurance Asset Management
Mahendra Siregar
Vice Minister of Finance of Indonesia and G20 Sherpa
for Indonesia
Scott Sleyster
Chief Investment Officer, Prudential
Yngve Slyngstad
Chief Executive Officer, Norges Bank Investment
Management, Norway
Sergey Storchak
Deputy Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation
William Streeter
Head of Debt, Asia, Hastings Fund Management
and Infrastructure Debt Advisor, Westpac
Davide Taliente
Managing Partner, Oliver Wyman Europe
OECD/Euromoney Infrastructure Summit
29 May 2013, Intercontinental Hotel, Paris, France
Co-organised by the OECD and Euromoney, this event brought together
institutional investors, financial industry representatives (banks, asset
managers, rating agencies) and policy makers to discuss investment
opportunities and financing solutions for investors.
Questions and issues considered during the panel discussions and
workshops included:
n Infrastructure investment and the search for yield in a low
interest rate environment
n Basel-III, Solvency 2 and the effect of regulation on
infrastructure financing
n Why “originate to distribute” is necessary and securitisation
is not a bad word in infrastructure
n Debt or equity? Fixed or floating? Invest directly or
indirectly? Credit risk or liquidity premium?
n Lessons from Canada and Australia: what have the
governments and regulators here done right?
n Pension fund investing: the effect of defined benefit
vs. defined contribution plans
n Play safe with mature Brownfield assets or bear Greenfield
construction risks?
n Infrastructure as asset class? No – it has to be classified
under listed/unlisted debt/equity. Yes – it has specialised
characteristics of its own and now offers sub asset classes.
n Is this the year of project bonds?
n From structuring PPPs to passing the litmus test: can this
project be purely private and yet viable?
n The extinction of monoline insurers – good or bad? And how
to assess credit risk and enhance creditworthiness now?
n Infrastructure investment from Brazil to Africa, the need
to assess each project’s own merits, and the risks and
rewards of being ahead of the crowd in the emerging world
n The responsibility of governments and the private sector’s
way of mitigating and dealing with political risk
n The role of multilateral institutions like IFC and EBRD, and
national development banks in kick-starting Greenfield
projects in developing countries
n Renewable energy projects: the role of consistent
government policies on incentives and subsidies, and the
need to increase commercial viability
30. 28
APEC/OECD Seminar on Enhancing the Role
of Institutional Investors in Infrastructure Financing
29 August 2013, Palembang, Indonesia
Under the aegis of APEC, the OECD organised a high-level seminar on
“Enhancing the Role of Institutional Investors in Infrastructure Financing”
in Palembang, Indonesia, on 29 August 2013. The seminar was co-
hosted by the Indonesian Ministry of Finance and supported by the
Japanese government. Multilaterals such as the World Bank and the
Asian Development Bank were involved in the seminar and a background
paper on infrastructure financing in Indonesia was prepared.
Indonesia’s Vice Minister of Finance, Mahendra Siregar, and OECD
Deputy Secretary-General Rintaro Tamaki presided over the seminar
which was attended by around 120 high-level participants from both
public and private sectors in the Asia Pacific region, as well as experts
from financial institutions, international organisations, and academia.
Participants examined the important role that can be played by
institutional investors and sovereign wealth funds in providing long-term
financing for infrastructure investment. The seminar also provided a
platform for dialogue about infrastructure among international forums,
particularly between APEC and the G20.
In discussing infrastructure financing, participants agreed that the
issue should not be viewed as an aid or development issue. Rather, it
is crucial to approach it from a perspective of how the region can work
co-operatively to better channel all available funds from both public and
private sources towards more productive investments in infrastructure,
in order to promote stronger growth and development. Productive
investment in infrastructure can be carried out through creating more
transparent regulatory frameworks, better accessibility to capital, more
supportive financial markets, and increased capacities in economies to
absorb capital flows. In particular, based on work related to the OECD
project on long-term investment, the panels deliberated on the vehicles
and major initiatives to pool resources to finance infrastructure project,
including green projects. Participants also highlighted the need for
a clear benchmark for measuring investment performance, seen by
many as one of the main barriers to investing in infrastructure.
Rintaro Tamaki
Deputy Secretary-General, OECD
Dr. Leslie Teo
Chief Economist, GIC, Singapore
Gerassimos Thomas
Director Finance, Directorate General Economic
and Financial Affairs, European Commission
John Thompson
Consultant and former Head of the Financial Affairs
Division, OECD
Konstantin Ugryumov
President, National Association of Pension Funds,
Russian Federation
Junichi Umezu
Senior General Manager, Dai-ichi Life International
Rob van den Goorbergh
Head of Investment Research, APG
Han van der Hoorn
Principal Risk Manager, PGGM
Laurence van Prooijen
Senior Investment Officer, French PPP Taskforce,
Ministry of Economy, France
Lubomir Varbanov
Chief Investment Officer and Head of Global Equity,
Infrastructure and Natural Resources, International
Finance Corporation
Erik Vermeulen
Vice President Corporate Legal Department
Phillips International
Kenneth Waller
Director, Australian APEC Study Centre
RMIT University
Vanessa Wang
Managing Director, Asia Pacific Head of Pension
Services, Citibank
Ulrik Dan Weuder
Head of Infrastructure and Chief Executive Officer
of ATP Alternative Investment, Supplementary Pension
of Denmark–ATP
Jeroen Wilbrink
Head of ALM and Risk Management, Mercer
Gavin Wilson
Chief Executive Officer, IFC Asset Management
Company, World Bank Group
Walter Winrow
Managing Director, Moody’s
Li Yao
Chief Executive Officer, China-ASEAN Fund
Juan Yermo
Senior Advisor, Office of the Secretary-General, OECD;
former Deputy Head, Financial Affairs Division, OECD
Prof. Bernard Y. Yeung
Dean of the National University of Singapore Business
School, Member of the Financial Research Council of
the Monetary Authority of Singapore
Ksenia Yudaeva
Chief of the Presidential Experts’ Directorate, Executive
Office, Russian Sherpa in G20 to lead Russia’s
Presidency, Russian Federation
Dominik Zunt
Policy Officer, Directorate General Economic and
Financial Affairs, European Commission
32. Information on all project research and events is available at www.oecd.org/finance/lti
For further information, please contact
Raffaele Della Croce
Lead Manager - Long-term Investment
Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
Raffaele.DELLACROCE@oecd.org
Caroline Thompson
Project Coordinator
Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
Caroline.THOMPSON@oecd.org
Tel: +33 (0)1 45 24 78 51