How to teach grammar from
examples
Inductive teaching
Inductive teaching
•Students learn the rules by
providing several
examples and inferring by
the repetitions.
Learning through
experience
Use of Direct Method,
Natural Approach, Total
Physical Response.
•Language is
process better
without
translation.
Discovering the rule
•It involves
different cycles of
trial and error.
•The guidance and
feedback of the
teacher is also
necessary.
PROS
Rules are meaningful and
memorable for Ss.
Ss are actively involved in the
learning process.
Mental effort ensures greater
memorability.
Encourage pattern-recognition
and problem-solving abilities
what makes t suitable for
learners who like this type of
challenges.
When done collaboratively
and in the target language,
Ss have opportunity for
extra language practice.
Prepare Ss for self-reliance and
leads to learners 'autonomy.
CONS
It takes a lot of time and energy,
can lead to missing practice.
Working too much on rules
may mislead Ss to believe that
rules are the objective of the
language..
Ss may hypothesize the wrong
rule in the application.
Can take a lot of time from
the teacher to plan a
lesson.
Students may feel
frustrated if they
prefer to be told the
rule.
Resources:
How to teach Grammar
Scott Thornbury
Longman
©Pearson Education Limited 1999

Inductive teaching

  • 1.
    How to teachgrammar from examples Inductive teaching
  • 2.
    Inductive teaching •Students learnthe rules by providing several examples and inferring by the repetitions.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Use of DirectMethod, Natural Approach, Total Physical Response. •Language is process better without translation.
  • 6.
    Discovering the rule •Itinvolves different cycles of trial and error. •The guidance and feedback of the teacher is also necessary.
  • 7.
    PROS Rules are meaningfuland memorable for Ss. Ss are actively involved in the learning process. Mental effort ensures greater memorability. Encourage pattern-recognition and problem-solving abilities what makes t suitable for learners who like this type of challenges. When done collaboratively and in the target language, Ss have opportunity for extra language practice. Prepare Ss for self-reliance and leads to learners 'autonomy.
  • 8.
    CONS It takes alot of time and energy, can lead to missing practice. Working too much on rules may mislead Ss to believe that rules are the objective of the language.. Ss may hypothesize the wrong rule in the application. Can take a lot of time from the teacher to plan a lesson. Students may feel frustrated if they prefer to be told the rule.
  • 9.
    Resources: How to teachGrammar Scott Thornbury Longman ©Pearson Education Limited 1999