This presentation discusses how secondary teachers can help their students understand the nature of science more fully. The presentation discusses strategies to integrate the nature of science within other instruction.
The document outlines the scientific attitude that scientists and students studying science should possess. It lists 14 attributes that comprise scientific attitude, including curiosity, determination, open-mindedness, objectivity, humility, skepticism, patience, empathy, intellectual honesty, perseverance, self-confidence, and ethics. Each attribute is further explained with examples of famous scientists who embodied that quality such as Isaac Newton, Alexander Graham Bell, and Louis Pasteur.
Investigation: How Can Looking at the Same Information from Different Perspec...Big History Project
Have you ever developed a new point of view? If so, what affect did it have on you? This investigation looks at changes in points of view in science, and explores the impact on innovation and the world.
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
Investigation: How and Why Do Individuals Change Their Minds?Big History Project
Many important changes in the world have happened because people came to new conclusions. But it's not always easy to question your thinking or ideas. When and why should people change their minds?
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
This document discusses the importance of developing scientific literacy in children. It provides examples of scientists who made important contributions despite challenges, and defines scientific literacy as the ability to think scientifically and use science to understand the world. The document advocates that parents can foster scientific literacy by modeling curiosity, engaging children in home investigations, and discussing science news without lecturing. Simply providing science-focused toys is not enough; parents should make learning a fun process of asking questions together.
The History Of Science In Science Education: Inquiring about InquiryJerrid Kruse
This powerpoint was used at a National Science Teacher Association meeting. The history of science can be used to help students understand more deeply how science works, or the nature of science. The presentation also discusses aspects of the nature of science and inquiry teaching. The presentation also notes the vital role of the teacher more "pulling it all off".
This document provides an overview of an educator's teaching philosophy and experiences. It begins with quotes about experimentation and engaging students. The educator then discusses adapting curriculum to student worldviews and incorporating interdisciplinary lessons. Examples are provided of taking students on science field trips and a boat trip on Lake Michigan to work with scientists. The educator emphasizes assessing long-term student knowledge through discussions and debates rather than multiple choice tests. The goal is for students to understand relevance and apply knowledge to their lives. The document concludes with the educator sharing their contact information and inviting questions.
You will have to learn to develop these scientific attitudes through continuous study and research. Scientists exhibit patterns of behavior guided by values and attitudes that constitute habits of mind. As you study science, you will learn to use the scientific method in solving problems.
This document discusses the nature of science (NOS) and scientific knowledge. It defines NOS as the epistemology and sociology of science, or science as a way of knowing. Some key aspects of NOS discussed include scientific inquiry, the scientific worldview, and the scientific enterprise. The document also examines how NOS can be taught, the challenges to teaching NOS, and different tools for measuring students' understanding of NOS.
The document outlines the scientific attitude that scientists and students studying science should possess. It lists 14 attributes that comprise scientific attitude, including curiosity, determination, open-mindedness, objectivity, humility, skepticism, patience, empathy, intellectual honesty, perseverance, self-confidence, and ethics. Each attribute is further explained with examples of famous scientists who embodied that quality such as Isaac Newton, Alexander Graham Bell, and Louis Pasteur.
Investigation: How Can Looking at the Same Information from Different Perspec...Big History Project
Have you ever developed a new point of view? If so, what affect did it have on you? This investigation looks at changes in points of view in science, and explores the impact on innovation and the world.
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
Investigation: How and Why Do Individuals Change Their Minds?Big History Project
Many important changes in the world have happened because people came to new conclusions. But it's not always easy to question your thinking or ideas. When and why should people change their minds?
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
This document discusses the importance of developing scientific literacy in children. It provides examples of scientists who made important contributions despite challenges, and defines scientific literacy as the ability to think scientifically and use science to understand the world. The document advocates that parents can foster scientific literacy by modeling curiosity, engaging children in home investigations, and discussing science news without lecturing. Simply providing science-focused toys is not enough; parents should make learning a fun process of asking questions together.
The History Of Science In Science Education: Inquiring about InquiryJerrid Kruse
This powerpoint was used at a National Science Teacher Association meeting. The history of science can be used to help students understand more deeply how science works, or the nature of science. The presentation also discusses aspects of the nature of science and inquiry teaching. The presentation also notes the vital role of the teacher more "pulling it all off".
This document provides an overview of an educator's teaching philosophy and experiences. It begins with quotes about experimentation and engaging students. The educator then discusses adapting curriculum to student worldviews and incorporating interdisciplinary lessons. Examples are provided of taking students on science field trips and a boat trip on Lake Michigan to work with scientists. The educator emphasizes assessing long-term student knowledge through discussions and debates rather than multiple choice tests. The goal is for students to understand relevance and apply knowledge to their lives. The document concludes with the educator sharing their contact information and inviting questions.
You will have to learn to develop these scientific attitudes through continuous study and research. Scientists exhibit patterns of behavior guided by values and attitudes that constitute habits of mind. As you study science, you will learn to use the scientific method in solving problems.
This document discusses the nature of science (NOS) and scientific knowledge. It defines NOS as the epistemology and sociology of science, or science as a way of knowing. Some key aspects of NOS discussed include scientific inquiry, the scientific worldview, and the scientific enterprise. The document also examines how NOS can be taught, the challenges to teaching NOS, and different tools for measuring students' understanding of NOS.
This document provides information about a teacher education course called "All About You!" which focuses on life science topics over 6 days. The course covers fundamentals of life science, structure and function of cells, DNA and genetics, variation in life, evidence of evolution, evolution in our lives, and the nature of science. Examples are given of how scientific ideas are subject to change and how students and teachers can think like scientists through inquiry-based learning and modifying theories based on new evidence.
The document discusses the nature of science by providing a checklist of key characteristics of science and comparing it to Ernest Rutherford's investigation into the structure of the atom. Some key points made are:
- Science asks questions about the natural world and studies natural phenomena through observation, evidence and testing of ideas. It aims to understand the universe and how things work.
- Rutherford's atomic research exemplified the scientific process by using tools to study atoms, which cannot be seen, in order to learn about their structure.
- While science can investigate many topics, it is limited to natural explanations and cannot address supernatural phenomena or concepts outside the natural world.
This document provides an overview of what science is and how it works. It discusses that:
1) Science is both a body of knowledge and a process of discovery to understand the natural world through evidence-based investigation of testable ideas and questions.
2) A key characteristic of science is that it aims to develop explanations of the natural world that can be revised as new evidence emerges. While scientific ideas are subject to change, they become widely accepted when supported by multiple lines of evidence.
3) An example of the scientific process discussed is Ernest Rutherford's early 20th century work investigating the structure of atoms through experiments firing alpha particles at gold foil. His goal was to understand the natural world at the atomic
This document provides an overview of what science is and how it works. It discusses that:
1) Science is both a body of knowledge and a process of discovery to understand the natural world through evidence-based investigation of testable ideas and questions.
2) A key characteristic of science is that it aims to develop explanations of the natural world that can be revised as new evidence emerges. While scientific ideas are subject to change, they become widely accepted when supported by multiple lines of evidence.
3) An example of the scientific process discussed is Ernest Rutherford's early 20th century work investigating the structure of atoms through experiments firing alpha particles at gold foil. His goal was to understand the natural world at the atomic
This document provides an overview of what science is and how it works. It discusses that science is both a body of knowledge and a process of discovery. Key aspects of science outlined include that it asks questions about the natural world, aims to explain and understand through testable ideas, and works through an ongoing process of gathering evidence and refining understandings. The document uses Ernest Rutherford's investigation of the structure of atoms in the early 1900s as an example of the scientific process in action.
The atomic bomb was invented by the Manhattan Project, a massive scientific research program led by the United States during World War II. The project involved over 130,000 people and was headed up by physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer. However, the work of physicist Leo Szilard was also instrumental in getting the project started earlier. Szilard had the initial idea that a nuclear chain reaction could be used for a bomb and pushed hard to get funding, partnering with Albert Einstein to convince the US government to fund nuclear weapons research. This ultimately led to the creation of the Manhattan Project and the invention of the atomic bomb years earlier than may have otherwise occurred.
The document discusses the meaning and nature of science. It defines science as a body of knowledge acquired through observation and experimentation. Science involves curiosity about the natural world, precise observation, logical thinking, and adjusting to nature. It can be viewed as a body of knowledge, a method of inquiry, and an attitude. As a method, science involves identifying problems, gathering observations, developing hypotheses, making predictions, and testing hypotheses. As an attitude, it cultivates open-mindedness, objectivity, and a systematic approach to problem-solving. The document also outlines the aims, objectives, values and functions of teaching physical science.
Michael Fenton - Reclaiming the Maker Space for ScienceMichael Fenton
This document shares stories from the author's experience as a scientist, educator, and science communicator. The stories are meant to inspire and challenge views of science education. The author advocates for more authentic, hands-on science learning where students can observe phenomena first-hand rather than just reading about it. The maker movement is discussed critically, arguing that science has always involved hands-on experimentation and the development of new technologies. Examples are given of student science projects that made real contributions. The key message is that more experiential, student-directed learning can make science more engaging and impactful.
The document discusses the values of science, noting that while science can create both beneficial and harmful things, it is not inherently moral, and that society can influence scientific progress both positively and negatively through their understanding and acceptance of new ideas and technologies. It also argues that true understanding of science allows humanity to appreciate our own complexity and the immense potential of scientific discovery to improve lives.
Scientific Method is a process used to build and organize knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the natural world. It involves making observations, asking questions, formulating hypotheses, making predictions, conducting experiments, and analyzing the results. While science is constantly evolving as new discoveries are made, the scientific method helps ensure research is objective, evidence-based, and peer-reviewed.
The scientific method is important because it allows for a systematic process of exploring the natural world to build understanding. By making detailed observations and asking questions, researchers can form hypotheses to explain phenomena. Experiments are then designed to test these hypotheses, either supporting or dis
The TermsMany terms mean different things in our common language a.docxgloriab9
The Terms
Many terms mean different things in our common language and in scientific language, which leads to misunderstandings about what they mean. This is especially true with terms like theory and law. The table below shows a few terms about scientific knowledge, defined in both our common language and scientific language.
Commonly Misunderstood Terms
Term
Common Definition
Scientific Definition
hypothesis
an educated guess
a
testable
explanation used to guide research
theory
an idea
a set of ideas supported by multiple experiments, done by multiple scientists that describe
why
something occurs
law
an absolute truth
a description of
what
occurs (not why it occurs) supported by multiple experiments
Please read the article
HERE
to better understand the differences between these terms.
Example Situation:
I have asked a few friends to help me with a little experiment. I have asked them to put a white rose in a small vase filled almost to the top with water and add a few drops of blue food coloring. They are to make observations while the flower changes.
What has occurred?
We have put it in water and left it for a few hours.
When we came back we all had the same outcome. The flower had turned blue.
This is what we will call
Scientific law.
It is the happenings of a certain experiment. If you put a flower in colored water the flower will take on the color of the water. It simply says WHAT will happen.
But
why
did it occur?
My friends and I believe it is because the colored water is drawn up through the flower's stem.
This is what we call a
scientific theory.
It tries to explain WHY something occurs.
A scientific theory is not less true than a scientific law. However, a scientific law is a direct result of the results of the experiment. Since in order to become a scientific law it must be proven many times, it is unlikely that somehow new results will occur and a law will be disproved. However, a scientific theory is based on
interpretation
of experimental results. The results are not usually proven wrong, just the conclusions drawn from the observations. As new and different information becomes available we may realize that we did not draw the correct conclusion and we need to adjust our theory accordingly.
Just a Theory
When arguing against a scientific theory, like the theory of evolution, people will sometimes say, "but its just a theory." That means that they do not understand that scientific theories are the strongest explanations offered by science. Theories are not scientific laws "in training," like how bills can be ratified into laws. A scientific theory does not ever turn into a scientific law. Instead laws describe what happens, frequently with an equation, while theories explain why it happens. Theories are built on the work on many scientists who conduct many different experiments. Not all of these experiments have the same goal, but through their combined work theories are constantly revised.
Science, Space And Life In Other PlanetsWhatADevil
The document discusses the limitations of science in determining whether life exists on other planets. It argues that while science relies on evidence and experimentation, it cannot prove the existence of life elsewhere because it has no way to directly observe or experiment on other planets. The document asserts that claims of evidence like water on Mars or structures only represent hypotheses, not facts, and that science cannot say for certain whether life exists elsewhere or if reports of things like UFOs are true. In the end, the document concludes that science is not absolute and cannot discover if life exists on other planets since it cannot apply the scientific method to directly observe or experiment on aliens.
The document discusses problem-based learning (PBL) as a pedagogical approach. It notes that PBL uses ill-structured problems to initiate student-led inquiry, positions students as stakeholders in investigating problems, and coaches them with metacognitive questioning. Key components of PBL include using problems to drive instruction of core content and skills while also developing conceptual understanding, research abilities, dispositions, and ethics.
This document discusses the scientific method and scientific theories. It explains that scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of aspects of the natural world based on repeated observation and experimentation. Theories are created from hypotheses that have been tested through the scientific method and gather evidence. Scientific theories can explain diverse phenomena and make falsifiable predictions, making them the most reliable form of scientific knowledge. Theories and laws are both produced through the scientific method but theories are broader in scope and can unify and explain laws.
This document discusses building scientific inquiry skills from infancy through elementary school. It outlines how inquiry can look different at each developmental stage, from developing vocabulary and encouraging questioning in infants and toddlers, to more sophisticated investigations led by school-aged children with teacher scaffolding. The document provides examples of inquiry-based activities for different ages, and emphasizes creating an environment where children can explore, ask questions, and investigate concepts through hands-on experiences. National and state standards for scientific inquiry are also summarized.
This document discusses science as a process of inquiry. It explains that science involves developing process skills like observation, inference, classification, and measurement. The key aspects of scientific inquiry are asking questions, developing hypotheses, planning investigations, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. Scientific inquiry allows flexibility in approaches and helps learners develop important skills. Teachers should provide opportunities for investigative activities to help students understand the nature of scientific inquiry.
This document provides information and guidance about teaching science using an inquiry-based approach. It begins by highlighting the importance of inquiry for engaging students in science and lists some benefits of using inquiry-based methods. It then provides an example of what an inquiry lesson might look like in an elementary classroom and describes how students generate and test hypotheses. The document also outlines the 5E model for lesson planning and includes an example of how it can be applied. It encourages self-study of inquiry approaches and shares a survey opportunity related to the content discussed.
This document provides an overview of psychology as a science and discusses various ways of knowing, including empirical and non-empirical methods. It describes science as empirical, objective, self-correcting, and tentative/progressive. Nonempirical ways of knowing like authority, logic, and common sense are discussed alongside their limitations, contrasting them with the empirical scientific method which relies on objective evidence over intuition.
The document discusses the research project of Tamara Blomberg on the topic of evolution vs. creationism and intelligent design being taught in public schools. It outlines the phases of the project, including narrowing the topic focus, revising the thesis statement based on professor feedback, and what was learned through the research process. The thesis statement evolved from arguing that both evolution and creationism should be taught equally to stating that both evolution and intelligent design should be taught in science class to allow students to critically analyze the evidence for both perspectives.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
More Related Content
Similar to Incorporating the Nature of Science Throughout the Year
This document provides information about a teacher education course called "All About You!" which focuses on life science topics over 6 days. The course covers fundamentals of life science, structure and function of cells, DNA and genetics, variation in life, evidence of evolution, evolution in our lives, and the nature of science. Examples are given of how scientific ideas are subject to change and how students and teachers can think like scientists through inquiry-based learning and modifying theories based on new evidence.
The document discusses the nature of science by providing a checklist of key characteristics of science and comparing it to Ernest Rutherford's investigation into the structure of the atom. Some key points made are:
- Science asks questions about the natural world and studies natural phenomena through observation, evidence and testing of ideas. It aims to understand the universe and how things work.
- Rutherford's atomic research exemplified the scientific process by using tools to study atoms, which cannot be seen, in order to learn about their structure.
- While science can investigate many topics, it is limited to natural explanations and cannot address supernatural phenomena or concepts outside the natural world.
This document provides an overview of what science is and how it works. It discusses that:
1) Science is both a body of knowledge and a process of discovery to understand the natural world through evidence-based investigation of testable ideas and questions.
2) A key characteristic of science is that it aims to develop explanations of the natural world that can be revised as new evidence emerges. While scientific ideas are subject to change, they become widely accepted when supported by multiple lines of evidence.
3) An example of the scientific process discussed is Ernest Rutherford's early 20th century work investigating the structure of atoms through experiments firing alpha particles at gold foil. His goal was to understand the natural world at the atomic
This document provides an overview of what science is and how it works. It discusses that:
1) Science is both a body of knowledge and a process of discovery to understand the natural world through evidence-based investigation of testable ideas and questions.
2) A key characteristic of science is that it aims to develop explanations of the natural world that can be revised as new evidence emerges. While scientific ideas are subject to change, they become widely accepted when supported by multiple lines of evidence.
3) An example of the scientific process discussed is Ernest Rutherford's early 20th century work investigating the structure of atoms through experiments firing alpha particles at gold foil. His goal was to understand the natural world at the atomic
This document provides an overview of what science is and how it works. It discusses that science is both a body of knowledge and a process of discovery. Key aspects of science outlined include that it asks questions about the natural world, aims to explain and understand through testable ideas, and works through an ongoing process of gathering evidence and refining understandings. The document uses Ernest Rutherford's investigation of the structure of atoms in the early 1900s as an example of the scientific process in action.
The atomic bomb was invented by the Manhattan Project, a massive scientific research program led by the United States during World War II. The project involved over 130,000 people and was headed up by physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer. However, the work of physicist Leo Szilard was also instrumental in getting the project started earlier. Szilard had the initial idea that a nuclear chain reaction could be used for a bomb and pushed hard to get funding, partnering with Albert Einstein to convince the US government to fund nuclear weapons research. This ultimately led to the creation of the Manhattan Project and the invention of the atomic bomb years earlier than may have otherwise occurred.
The document discusses the meaning and nature of science. It defines science as a body of knowledge acquired through observation and experimentation. Science involves curiosity about the natural world, precise observation, logical thinking, and adjusting to nature. It can be viewed as a body of knowledge, a method of inquiry, and an attitude. As a method, science involves identifying problems, gathering observations, developing hypotheses, making predictions, and testing hypotheses. As an attitude, it cultivates open-mindedness, objectivity, and a systematic approach to problem-solving. The document also outlines the aims, objectives, values and functions of teaching physical science.
Michael Fenton - Reclaiming the Maker Space for ScienceMichael Fenton
This document shares stories from the author's experience as a scientist, educator, and science communicator. The stories are meant to inspire and challenge views of science education. The author advocates for more authentic, hands-on science learning where students can observe phenomena first-hand rather than just reading about it. The maker movement is discussed critically, arguing that science has always involved hands-on experimentation and the development of new technologies. Examples are given of student science projects that made real contributions. The key message is that more experiential, student-directed learning can make science more engaging and impactful.
The document discusses the values of science, noting that while science can create both beneficial and harmful things, it is not inherently moral, and that society can influence scientific progress both positively and negatively through their understanding and acceptance of new ideas and technologies. It also argues that true understanding of science allows humanity to appreciate our own complexity and the immense potential of scientific discovery to improve lives.
Scientific Method is a process used to build and organize knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the natural world. It involves making observations, asking questions, formulating hypotheses, making predictions, conducting experiments, and analyzing the results. While science is constantly evolving as new discoveries are made, the scientific method helps ensure research is objective, evidence-based, and peer-reviewed.
The scientific method is important because it allows for a systematic process of exploring the natural world to build understanding. By making detailed observations and asking questions, researchers can form hypotheses to explain phenomena. Experiments are then designed to test these hypotheses, either supporting or dis
The TermsMany terms mean different things in our common language a.docxgloriab9
The Terms
Many terms mean different things in our common language and in scientific language, which leads to misunderstandings about what they mean. This is especially true with terms like theory and law. The table below shows a few terms about scientific knowledge, defined in both our common language and scientific language.
Commonly Misunderstood Terms
Term
Common Definition
Scientific Definition
hypothesis
an educated guess
a
testable
explanation used to guide research
theory
an idea
a set of ideas supported by multiple experiments, done by multiple scientists that describe
why
something occurs
law
an absolute truth
a description of
what
occurs (not why it occurs) supported by multiple experiments
Please read the article
HERE
to better understand the differences between these terms.
Example Situation:
I have asked a few friends to help me with a little experiment. I have asked them to put a white rose in a small vase filled almost to the top with water and add a few drops of blue food coloring. They are to make observations while the flower changes.
What has occurred?
We have put it in water and left it for a few hours.
When we came back we all had the same outcome. The flower had turned blue.
This is what we will call
Scientific law.
It is the happenings of a certain experiment. If you put a flower in colored water the flower will take on the color of the water. It simply says WHAT will happen.
But
why
did it occur?
My friends and I believe it is because the colored water is drawn up through the flower's stem.
This is what we call a
scientific theory.
It tries to explain WHY something occurs.
A scientific theory is not less true than a scientific law. However, a scientific law is a direct result of the results of the experiment. Since in order to become a scientific law it must be proven many times, it is unlikely that somehow new results will occur and a law will be disproved. However, a scientific theory is based on
interpretation
of experimental results. The results are not usually proven wrong, just the conclusions drawn from the observations. As new and different information becomes available we may realize that we did not draw the correct conclusion and we need to adjust our theory accordingly.
Just a Theory
When arguing against a scientific theory, like the theory of evolution, people will sometimes say, "but its just a theory." That means that they do not understand that scientific theories are the strongest explanations offered by science. Theories are not scientific laws "in training," like how bills can be ratified into laws. A scientific theory does not ever turn into a scientific law. Instead laws describe what happens, frequently with an equation, while theories explain why it happens. Theories are built on the work on many scientists who conduct many different experiments. Not all of these experiments have the same goal, but through their combined work theories are constantly revised.
Science, Space And Life In Other PlanetsWhatADevil
The document discusses the limitations of science in determining whether life exists on other planets. It argues that while science relies on evidence and experimentation, it cannot prove the existence of life elsewhere because it has no way to directly observe or experiment on other planets. The document asserts that claims of evidence like water on Mars or structures only represent hypotheses, not facts, and that science cannot say for certain whether life exists elsewhere or if reports of things like UFOs are true. In the end, the document concludes that science is not absolute and cannot discover if life exists on other planets since it cannot apply the scientific method to directly observe or experiment on aliens.
The document discusses problem-based learning (PBL) as a pedagogical approach. It notes that PBL uses ill-structured problems to initiate student-led inquiry, positions students as stakeholders in investigating problems, and coaches them with metacognitive questioning. Key components of PBL include using problems to drive instruction of core content and skills while also developing conceptual understanding, research abilities, dispositions, and ethics.
This document discusses the scientific method and scientific theories. It explains that scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of aspects of the natural world based on repeated observation and experimentation. Theories are created from hypotheses that have been tested through the scientific method and gather evidence. Scientific theories can explain diverse phenomena and make falsifiable predictions, making them the most reliable form of scientific knowledge. Theories and laws are both produced through the scientific method but theories are broader in scope and can unify and explain laws.
This document discusses building scientific inquiry skills from infancy through elementary school. It outlines how inquiry can look different at each developmental stage, from developing vocabulary and encouraging questioning in infants and toddlers, to more sophisticated investigations led by school-aged children with teacher scaffolding. The document provides examples of inquiry-based activities for different ages, and emphasizes creating an environment where children can explore, ask questions, and investigate concepts through hands-on experiences. National and state standards for scientific inquiry are also summarized.
This document discusses science as a process of inquiry. It explains that science involves developing process skills like observation, inference, classification, and measurement. The key aspects of scientific inquiry are asking questions, developing hypotheses, planning investigations, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. Scientific inquiry allows flexibility in approaches and helps learners develop important skills. Teachers should provide opportunities for investigative activities to help students understand the nature of scientific inquiry.
This document provides information and guidance about teaching science using an inquiry-based approach. It begins by highlighting the importance of inquiry for engaging students in science and lists some benefits of using inquiry-based methods. It then provides an example of what an inquiry lesson might look like in an elementary classroom and describes how students generate and test hypotheses. The document also outlines the 5E model for lesson planning and includes an example of how it can be applied. It encourages self-study of inquiry approaches and shares a survey opportunity related to the content discussed.
This document provides an overview of psychology as a science and discusses various ways of knowing, including empirical and non-empirical methods. It describes science as empirical, objective, self-correcting, and tentative/progressive. Nonempirical ways of knowing like authority, logic, and common sense are discussed alongside their limitations, contrasting them with the empirical scientific method which relies on objective evidence over intuition.
The document discusses the research project of Tamara Blomberg on the topic of evolution vs. creationism and intelligent design being taught in public schools. It outlines the phases of the project, including narrowing the topic focus, revising the thesis statement based on professor feedback, and what was learned through the research process. The thesis statement evolved from arguing that both evolution and creationism should be taught equally to stating that both evolution and intelligent design should be taught in science class to allow students to critically analyze the evidence for both perspectives.
Similar to Incorporating the Nature of Science Throughout the Year (20)
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.