Talks provided at the Scottish Fisheries Co-ordination Centre/Institute of Fisheries Management MAPPING FISHERIES workshop in Edinburgh on March 1st-2nd 2016
2. Structure
• What is hydraulic habitat modelling and mapping?
• Hydraulic modelling (in 2 slides……)
• 3 case studies
– As part of the design process
– Investigation tool to build evidence
– Impartial appraisal
• Summary
3. Hydraulic habitat
The combination of river depth, velocity and substrate determines the
available physical habitat for aquatic species.
Therefore, hydraulic models can then be used in combination with
knowledge of the habitat requirements of species/life stage of interest
to determine habitat availability. Can also inform on sediment
dynamics.
13. Case study 2 – Evidence
Q95 Depth. On-weir HEP Q95 Depth. Depleted reach Q95 Velocity. On-weir HEP Q95 Velocity. Depleted reach
Difference = post installation minus pre installation.
14. Case study 2 – Evidence
Q20 Depth. On-weir HEP Q20 Depth. Depleted reach Q20 Velocity. On-weir HEP Q20 Velocity. Depleted reach
Difference = post installation minus pre installation.
15. Case study 3 - Appraisal
Pool and run
Shoulder
Vegetation management
18. Case study 3 – Pool and run
Pre change adult Brown Trout habitat Post change adult Brown Trout habitat
Pre change Brown Trout spawning habitat Post change Brown Trout spawning habitat
Run
Pool
Run
Pool
Run
Pool
Run
Pool
19. Case study 3 - Shoulder
Pre-change 0+ Cyprinid habitat Post-change 0+ Cyprinid habitat
20. Case study 3 – Veg removal
Pre-change 0+ Cyprinid habitat Post-change 0+ Cyprinid habitat
Pre-change Brown Trout spawning habitat Post-change Brown Trout spawning
habitat
22. Summary
Pros Cons
Across whole flow regime and range
of species/life stages.
Cost of survey data vs scale of the
modelling
Spatial & crisp outputs Often limited knowledge of
requirements of many species
Results in a data poor situation Uncertainty in model results
Play tunes with model topography
Optimisation of designs
Editor's Notes
XS averaged velocity
Flat water surface
All flow is in the same direction and perpendicular to XS
Each XS is characteristic of the reach.
Ecologically distinct compared to upstream of the weir.
Suggestions that fish biomass is higher downstream than upstream.
The riffle/bar formed downstream of the deep pool thought to be very important (especially in lowland rivers).
Lots of anecdotal evidence about the importance of weir pool – Angling interest.
Sometimes the only hydro-morphologically diverse habitat in rivers where extensive impounded reaches occur.
Potential impacts at at-weir schemes
No scientific – before and after studies have been undertaken.
The hydromorph and ecology of a weir pool is dependent on the site specific hydrology and geomorphology.
Various unique factors:
Position of turbine.
Angle of orientation etc.
Features downstream of the weir
Flow requirements of scheme
If no depleted reach – only the flow patterns will change.
ADCP survey
Key area of interest is the gravel bar
Background to the project.
Going to look at feature scale effects, but do have figures for the whole study length in terms of habitat score, hydraulic biotope etc.