JUSTICE
LEAGUE
COMPANY
How to win
Cesim: Business
Simulation Games
CFVG 25, 2017
Content
ABOUT THE COMPANY
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY THROUGH ROUNDS
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS
MANAGEMENT SUCCESS AND FAILURES
RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER FUTURE
01
02
03
04
05
BEST PRODUCT
BEST PRICE
OUR MISSION IS BRING THE BEST PRODUCTS WITH BEST PRICE FOR CUSTOMERS OVER THE WOLRD
2MAIN STRATEGIES
3 markets: USA, ASIA, EUROPE
6 competitors with the same
resources at starting point
“Money” is the only barrier to
new technology
LEADING TECHNOLOGY
01
COST LEADERSHIP
02
LEARNING FROM THE PAST, FORECAST THE FUTURE
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY
THROUGH ROUNDS
ROUND 2 ROUND 3ROUND 1
OBJECTIVES
- Market leader by competitive price
- Testing competitor
- Tech investment
- Control all cost
- Pay annual dividend and buy back share
LESSONS
- Better invest in-house
- Cost transfer is important
- Asia need plants
OBJECTIVES
- Intensive investment: in house for
Tech 3,4 and 04 plants in Asia
- Minimize all cost
- Leave price war asap
LESSONS
- Forecast is very important
- Price war will be intensive for tech 1 and 2
- Competitors were slow at updating new
tech
OBJECTIVES
- Launching new tech at some
potential markets, gain as much
profit as possible
- Lead competitors to price war at
old tech
LESSONS
- Competitors were on technology
investment race
- The barrier to leave old tech was
high (inventory, sales volume)
ROUND 5 ROUND 6ROUND 4
OBJECTIVES
- Launching new tech at some potential
markets, gain as much profit as possible
- Lead competitors to price war at old tech
- Minimize inventory of old techs
- Sell plants in USA
LESSONS
- All have new technologies, understanding
competitors behavior next round and
decreasing cost were key
- The barrier to leave old tech was still high
(inventory, sales volume)
OBJECTIVES
- Replace all old techs (1,2) by new
techs (3,4)
- Gain profit with new tech
- Increase company value
- Increase inventory new tech
LESSONS
- Competitors’ inventory of old tech
(1,2) were too high  we would
win the last round
OBJECTIVES
- Strong MARKETING
competition in tech 3,4 to have
the best result in final battle
- Increase company value
- Minimize inventory cost
LESSONS
- We underestimate market 
shortage  lose sales
TSR
REVENUE
PROFIT
SHARE PRICE
KEY
PERFORMACE
RESULTS
Leading over 6 rounds
4
BIGGEST COMPANY
IN THE MARKET
$14,550 Billions
The follower: $7.9 Billions
KEY
PERFORMACE
RESULTS
REVENUE
& PROFIT
3,207
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
1 2 3 4 5 6
Thousands
REVENUE
HCM1
HCM2
HCM3
DORAEMON
Justice League
THE BIG APPLE
Slowly but Surely
733
-1,200
-900
-600
-300
0
300
600
900
1 2 3 4 5 6
Thousands
PROFIT
KEY
PERFORMACE
RESULTS
MARKET
SHARE
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
1 2 3 4 5 6
TECH 1 MARKETSHARE
HCM1 HCM2 HCM3
DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE
Slowly but Surely
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
1 2 3 4 5 6
TECH 2 MARKET SHARE
HCM1 HCM2 HCM3
DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE
Slowly but Surely
KEY
PERFORMACE
RESULTS
MARKET
SHARE
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
1 2 3 4 5 6
TECH 3 MARKET SHARE
HCM1 HCM2 HCM3
DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE
Slowly but Surely
-10.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5 6
TECH 4 MARKET SHARE
HCM1 HCM2 HCM3
DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE
Slowly but Surely
MANAGEMENT
SUCCESS
AND FAILURES
EFFECTIVE TEAM WORK: discipline, 2 hours
online meeting before deadline everyday. All
member have to prepare proposal for the
assigned departments. CROSS CHECKING
STRONG
INVESTMENT ON
MARKETING
IMPROVEMENT
ROUND AFTER
ROUND
EFFECTIVE
COST CONTROL
RIGHT
STRATEGY
MANAGEMENT
SUCCESS
AND FAILURES
FORECAST:
• Underestimate market demand in
round 6  lose sales
PRICE WAR:
• Lead the market to price war  low
profit than expected
PAY ATTENTION
TO DETAILS
FROM
PRODUCTION TO
FINANCE
FORECAST
FUTURE DEMAND
AND
COMPETITOR
BEHAVIORS
LOWER COST
BY PRICE TRANSFER,
OUTSOURCE FOR
NEWTECH, IN-HOUSE
INVESTMENT
BECOME LEADER
WITH NEW
TECHNOLOGY
RECOMMENDATION
FOR BETTER FUTURE
TEAM WORK
EFFECTIVELY
DECISION
MAKING
LEARNING FROM
COMPETITOR
CARE ABOUT
SHAREHOLDER
AND COMPANY
VALUE
RECOMMENDATION
FOR BETTER FUTURE
THE END

How to win Cesim: Business Simulation Games

  • 1.
    JUSTICE LEAGUE COMPANY How to win Cesim:Business Simulation Games CFVG 25, 2017
  • 2.
    Content ABOUT THE COMPANY COMPETITIVESTRATEGY THROUGH ROUNDS KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS MANAGEMENT SUCCESS AND FAILURES RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER FUTURE 01 02 03 04 05
  • 3.
    BEST PRODUCT BEST PRICE OURMISSION IS BRING THE BEST PRODUCTS WITH BEST PRICE FOR CUSTOMERS OVER THE WOLRD 2MAIN STRATEGIES 3 markets: USA, ASIA, EUROPE 6 competitors with the same resources at starting point “Money” is the only barrier to new technology LEADING TECHNOLOGY 01 COST LEADERSHIP 02
  • 4.
    LEARNING FROM THEPAST, FORECAST THE FUTURE COMPETITIVE STRATEGY THROUGH ROUNDS
  • 5.
    ROUND 2 ROUND3ROUND 1 OBJECTIVES - Market leader by competitive price - Testing competitor - Tech investment - Control all cost - Pay annual dividend and buy back share LESSONS - Better invest in-house - Cost transfer is important - Asia need plants OBJECTIVES - Intensive investment: in house for Tech 3,4 and 04 plants in Asia - Minimize all cost - Leave price war asap LESSONS - Forecast is very important - Price war will be intensive for tech 1 and 2 - Competitors were slow at updating new tech OBJECTIVES - Launching new tech at some potential markets, gain as much profit as possible - Lead competitors to price war at old tech LESSONS - Competitors were on technology investment race - The barrier to leave old tech was high (inventory, sales volume)
  • 6.
    ROUND 5 ROUND6ROUND 4 OBJECTIVES - Launching new tech at some potential markets, gain as much profit as possible - Lead competitors to price war at old tech - Minimize inventory of old techs - Sell plants in USA LESSONS - All have new technologies, understanding competitors behavior next round and decreasing cost were key - The barrier to leave old tech was still high (inventory, sales volume) OBJECTIVES - Replace all old techs (1,2) by new techs (3,4) - Gain profit with new tech - Increase company value - Increase inventory new tech LESSONS - Competitors’ inventory of old tech (1,2) were too high  we would win the last round OBJECTIVES - Strong MARKETING competition in tech 3,4 to have the best result in final battle - Increase company value - Minimize inventory cost LESSONS - We underestimate market  shortage  lose sales
  • 7.
    TSR REVENUE PROFIT SHARE PRICE KEY PERFORMACE RESULTS Leading over6 rounds 4 BIGGEST COMPANY IN THE MARKET $14,550 Billions The follower: $7.9 Billions
  • 8.
    KEY PERFORMACE RESULTS REVENUE & PROFIT 3,207 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 1 23 4 5 6 Thousands REVENUE HCM1 HCM2 HCM3 DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE Slowly but Surely 733 -1,200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1 2 3 4 5 6 Thousands PROFIT
  • 9.
    KEY PERFORMACE RESULTS MARKET SHARE -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 1 2 34 5 6 TECH 1 MARKETSHARE HCM1 HCM2 HCM3 DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE Slowly but Surely -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 TECH 2 MARKET SHARE HCM1 HCM2 HCM3 DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE Slowly but Surely
  • 10.
    KEY PERFORMACE RESULTS MARKET SHARE -20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 1 2 34 5 6 TECH 3 MARKET SHARE HCM1 HCM2 HCM3 DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE Slowly but Surely -10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 TECH 4 MARKET SHARE HCM1 HCM2 HCM3 DORAEMON Justice League THE BIG APPLE Slowly but Surely
  • 11.
    MANAGEMENT SUCCESS AND FAILURES EFFECTIVE TEAMWORK: discipline, 2 hours online meeting before deadline everyday. All member have to prepare proposal for the assigned departments. CROSS CHECKING STRONG INVESTMENT ON MARKETING IMPROVEMENT ROUND AFTER ROUND EFFECTIVE COST CONTROL RIGHT STRATEGY
  • 12.
    MANAGEMENT SUCCESS AND FAILURES FORECAST: • Underestimatemarket demand in round 6  lose sales PRICE WAR: • Lead the market to price war  low profit than expected
  • 13.
    PAY ATTENTION TO DETAILS FROM PRODUCTIONTO FINANCE FORECAST FUTURE DEMAND AND COMPETITOR BEHAVIORS LOWER COST BY PRICE TRANSFER, OUTSOURCE FOR NEWTECH, IN-HOUSE INVESTMENT BECOME LEADER WITH NEW TECHNOLOGY RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER FUTURE
  • 14.
    TEAM WORK EFFECTIVELY DECISION MAKING LEARNING FROM COMPETITOR CAREABOUT SHAREHOLDER AND COMPANY VALUE RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER FUTURE
  • 15.