The document provides guidance on creating effective rubrics for student assessment, emphasizing the importance of focusing on learning objectives and selecting performance criteria that accurately reflect student capabilities. It outlines common pitfalls to avoid, such as measuring multiple criteria at once and grading non-essential features, while highlighting the benefits of well-structured rubrics in enhancing learning and ensuring consistency in grading. Additionally, it discusses methods for assessing and converting rubric scores into grades, ultimately aiming to improve the evaluation process in educational settings.

1. Creating Meaningful
Rubrics for Student
Assessment
Aimee F. Strang, Pharm.D., MSHPEd
Assistant Dean of Curricular Assessment

2. Objectives
 Recognize common flaws
 Describe characteristics of good criteria
 Write descriptions that distinguish levels of
performance
 Use ExamSoft to assign grades
 Ensure rubrics evaluate learning
2

3. 3
Criteria
Levels of Performance

4. Benefits of Rubrics
 Performance assessment
 Authentic assessment
 Scoring guide
 Grader consistency
 Guide student learning
 Formative assessment
4

5. Part I:
How to Create a Rubric
5

6. 1. Focus on the Learning, Not the Activity
 Start with the learning objectives
 Create an assignment that demonstrates performance
of understanding
 Be wary of engaging busy work
LO: Analyze current trends that affect faculty and
institutions in academic health professions
 Create a jeopardy game
 Create a poster presentation
6

7. 2. Select Good Performance Criteria
 Demonstrate evidence of learning or meeting objective (not
achievement of assignment tasks)
 Criteria can be named, defined, described and observed
 Vary along a continuum of quality
 Unidimensional or distinct
LO: Triage a patient to the appropriate level of care
 History
 Medication History
 Triage
 Communication
7

8. 3. Differentiate Levels of Performance
 Start with a description of minimum proficiency
 Describe a continuum
 Yes  Yes but  No but  No
 How many levels?
LO: Recommend most appropriate cold medication to a
patient
 Medication choice
8

9. 4. Quality Check
 Grade past assignment
 Get peer feedback
 Get student feedback
 Make improvements each time
9

10. Part II:
 How NOT to Create a
Rubric
10

11.  Don’t Measure More Than 1 Criteria at a Time
Originality
• Develops a project that
is unique specifically
targeting a select
population
• Project presentation
delivery is designed for
a select population
• Develops a
project that
targets a select
population
• Project
presentation
delivery is
generic
• Develops a
generic project
• Project does not
target a select
population
Professional
Language
• Appropriate use of
professional language
and lay terms identified
as necessary for the
targeted population
• Spelling and grammar
are correct
• The balance
between
professional
language and lay
terms is
inappropriate
• Minimal spelling
and grammar
mistakes
• Unprofessional
language is used
often (texting
language)
• Many spelling
and grammar
mistakes
11

12.  Don’t Create Criterion for Nonessential
Features
 Neatness
 Design of cover page
 Audience engagement
 Format of references
12

13.  Don’t Score by Counting
13
Critical
Elements
Missing four or more of the
following:
• Background & description
• Market analysis and strategy
• Operational structure and
process
• Financial projections and
feasibility
• Action plan for implementation
• Critical risks and opportunities
• Conclusion/summary
Missing less
than 4
Includes all of
the following

14.  Don’t Score Things Not Part of the
Rubric
Professionalism Acted in a
professional
manner (eye
contact,
empathy,
open posture)
Acted
professional
but needs
some
improvement
Acted
professionally
but need
significant
improvement
Did not act
professionally
14

15.  Don’t Score the Product
15
Assignment Rubric Criterion
Reflect on today’s
learning
Stages of reflection
Write paper on history of
pharmacy
Organization, spelling,
length
Counsel patient on use of
eye drops
Introduction, body
language, eye contact

16.  Don’t Codify Assignment Directions
into Rubric
Performance
Level
Needs
Improvement
Satisfactory Excellent
Contribution
and
Participation
Not apparent that
all the students in
the group
contributed. One
or two people
appear to have
done all the work.
Student dissent
on levels of
contribution.
Apparent that
some of the
students
contributed a fair
share to the
project, though
some workloads
varied. Students
made an effort to
include all group
members in the
process.
Apparent that all
students contributed
equally to the project.
Evident that students
worked with each
other in a cooperative
manner and split the
project to match the
student’s strengths.
16

17.  Don’t Evaluative
17

18.  Quality Check
 Get 10-20 copies of student past work
 Sort in to 3 categories of quality (Excellent – Good –
Poor)
 Write descriptions for why each piece of work is
categorized
 Compare and contrast work to identify relevant criteria
 Write descriptions of quality along a continuum for
each criteria
18

19. Part III:
Converting Rubrics to
Grades
19

20. Assigning Grading Schemas
 Align levels with grading (A, B, C, D, F)
 Proficiency levels
• Exceeds, Meets, Needs Improvement, Significant Deficiency
• Beginner, Developing, Proficient, Advanced
 Minimum levels of acceptability = 60%
 Weighting criteria
• Topic selection, Background, Analysis, Conclusion
 Points vs Range
20

21. Using Points
21
FailingProficientAdvanced

22. 22
NoviceExpert Advancing
Rubric A
Rubric B

23. Weighting Criteria
23
Rubric B
Rubric A

24. Using Ranges
24
Determine Ranges
Enter Grade

25. Conclusion
 Recognize common flaws
 Describe characteristics of good criteria
 Write descriptions that distinguish levels of
performance
 Use ExamSoft to assign grades
 Ensure rubrics evaluate learning
25

26. Questions?
Contact Information:
Aimee Strang, Pharm.D., MSHPEd
Assistant Dean of Curricular Assessment
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
518-694-7320 | aimee.strang@acphs.edu
www.HPEdassessment.com
26