houdini paper
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•494 views
This document provides guidelines and grading criteria for an essay assignment about Harry Houdini. It includes instructions for formatting, headings, and sections. The essay should have an introduction with a claim statement and preview of three body paragraphs. Each body paragraph should be detailed and use transitions to explore different aspects of Houdini. The conclusion should restate the claim, answer "so what?", and explain why people should learn about Houdini and why he remains fascinating. Sections are graded on a 100 point scale.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Recommended
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 081921Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]D
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 08/19/21
Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]
Discussion Topic
Top of Form
Please refer to the resources provided on CDS Central. They are intended to help you engage effectively on the discussion board.
Due Thursday
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
· Discuss the concept of researcher bias. What are some ways a researcher might address these issues?
Include your own experience as well as two citations that align with or contradict your comments as sourced from peer-reviewed academic journals, industry publications, books, and/or other sources. Cite your sources using APA formatting.
Due Monday
Review others’ posts and respond to at least one of your course colleagues or your faculty member in 150 words. Why do you agree or disagree with their post? What in your professional experience supports your assertions?
Copyright 2019 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of FormBottom of FormBottom of Form
Discussion # 2 Due Fri 08/20/21
Wk 8 Discussion 2 [due Sat]
Discussion Topic
Top of Form
Please refer to the resources provided on CDS Central. They are intended to help you engage effectively on the discussion board.
Due Saturday
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
· Why is having a research protocol and a research script important in qualitative research?
Include your own experience as well as two citations that align with or contradict your comments as sourced from peer-reviewed academic journals, industry publications, books, and/or other sources. Cite your sources using APA formatting.
Due Monday
Review others’ posts and respond to at least one of your course colleagues or your faculty member in 150 words. Why do you agree or disagree with their post? What in your professional experience supports your assertions?
Copyright 2019 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: PRAC_6635_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric
Grid ViewList View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the skills identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.
Points:
Points Range:
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response provides ratings for all skills on the form.
Feedback:
...
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week9_Discussion_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or conci ...
Discussion Rub
Discussion Rubric: Undergraduate
Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful
connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own
thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance.
Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments
Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment.
For your initial post (1), you must do the following:
Compose a post of one to two paragraphs.
In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Eight, complete the initial post by Thursday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Take into consideration material such as course content and other
discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when
appropriate (make sure you are using proper citation methods for your
discipline when referencing scholarly or popular resources).
For your response posts (2), you must do the following:
Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial
post thread.
In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Eight, complete the two response posts by
Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating that “I agree”
or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion
prompt.
Rubric
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Comprehension Develops an initial post with an
organized, clear point of view or
idea using rich and significant detail
(100%)
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea using
adequate organization and
detail (85%)
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea but with
some gaps in organization and
detail (55%)
Does not develop an initial post
with an organized point of view
or idea (0%)
40
Timeliness Submits initial post on time
(100%)
Submits initial post one day late
(55%)
Submits initial post two or more
days late (0%)
10
Engagement Provides relevant and meaningful
response posts with clarifying
explanation and detail (100%)
Provides relevant response
posts with some explanation
and detail (85%)
Provides somewhat relevant
response posts with some
explanation and detail (55%)
Provides response posts that
are generic with little
explanation or detail (0%)
30
Writing
(Mechanics)
Writes posts that are easily
understood, clear, and concise
using proper citation methods
where applicable with no errors in
citations (100 ...
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week2_Discussion1_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or conc.
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$750.docx
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$75031-MarWilliamsEast$80031-MarJonesSouth$76531-MarWhiteWest$45631-MarJohnsonNorth$98731-MarTaylorWest$44331-MarYoungSouth$36831-MarHallEast$15930-JunSmithEast$1,20030-JunWilliamsEast$36930-JunJonesSouth$98030-JunWhiteWest$65030-JunJohnsonNorth$76030-JunTaylorWest$27830-JunYoungSouth$78030-JunHallEast$54730-SepSmithEast$69830-SepWilliamsEast$46730-SepJonesSouth$98330-SepWhiteWest$23730-SepJohnsonNorth$46930-SepTaylorWest$74030-SepYoungSouth$74930-SepHallEast$345
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week4_Discussion_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no .
Final Essay Global Inequality RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsTh
Final Essay Global Inequality Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Thoroughness, Thoughtfulness, Accuracy: Concepts and Arguments
25 pts
Perfect
23.75 pts
Excellent
Correctly uses concepts and arguments from relevant course materials to address the topic. Explanation is clear and thoughtful.
21.25 pts
Good
Correctly uses concepts and arguments from course materials to address the topic, but may not be complete, fully supported, or entirely clear.
18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Correctly uses some course concepts and arguments to address the topic. Explanation may be vague, incomplete, or lacking supporting evidence from texts
16.25 pts
Poor
Offers generally incorrect and/or incoherent explanation of concepts and arguments to address the topic.
0 pts
Missing
Does not address the topic and/or uses non-course materials.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Thoroughness, Thoughfulness, Accuracy: Using all of assigned materials.
25 pts
Perfect
23.75 pts
Excellent
Uses all of the required materials. Characterization of materials is accurate and thorough. Relevant points are made.
21.25 pts
Good
Uses the required materials, but characterization is not thorough.
18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Does not use all of the required materials. While some key points are addressed, others are ignored. Problems with accuracy.
16.25 pts
Poor
Makes little use of the required materials, misses key ideas and points, and/or inaccurately characterizes arguments.
0 pts
Missing
Does not make any meaningful reference to the required materials.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Thoroughness, Thoughfulness, Accuracy: Evidence
25 pts
Perfect
23.75 pts
Excellent
Uses course materials to present clear, complete, and accurate supporting evidence.
21.25 pts
Good
Uses evidence to present a clear and accurate explanation. Some key points are missing and/or unclear.
18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Uses some evidence, but may be vague, incomplete, or partially inaccurate.
16.25 pts
Poor
Largely inaccurate or incoherent presentation of evidence.
0 pts
Missing
Does not present evidence and/or uses non-course materials.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization: Introduction and Thesis
5 pts
Perfect
4.75 pts
Excellent
Clearly introduces assigned topic; identifies relevant questions/issues; presents specific thesis on assigned topic.
4.25 pts
Good
Clearly introduces assigned topic; clearly states thesis on assigned topic.
3.75 pts
Satisfactory
Vague introduction of assigned topic; vague thesis on assigned topic or thesis implied rather than stated.
3.25 pts
Poor
Introduces something other than assigned topic, thesis is not on topic, and/or introduction and thesis seriously misinterpret topic.
0 pts
Missing
Does not introduce topic or thesis.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization: Conclusion
5 pts
Perfect
4.75 pts
Excellent
Presents logical, clearly reasoned conclusions base ...
BUS 405 Effective Communication/tutorialrank.com
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Tutorial Purchased: 6 Times, Rating: A+
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 DQ 1 Blumes Formula, Allocation, and Selection
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 DQ 2 Money Market Funds
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 Quiz Chapters 1-4
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 Assignment Annualized Returns Chapter 3 problem 18
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 2 DQ 1 Primary and Secondary Markets
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 2 DQ 2 Contrarian Investing
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
Discussion Rubric to follow
Outstanding performance
Excellent performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting:
Writing
6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
0 (0%) - 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
10 (10%) - 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts main discussion by due date
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
First Response:
Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) - 9 (9%)
Respons ...
Discussion Post Levels of AchievementCriteria Belowexp
Discussion Post
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Belowexpectations Developing Competent Exemplary
One initial
major
response
(minimum
250 words)
to
discussion
question
0.00 %
Did not complete
this portion of
the assignment
or most of the
discussion
points were
inappropriate or
were not
identified and/or
response was
less than 250
words.
37.50 %
The discussion
points were
identified and
described but with
fair accuracy and
some of the
discussion points
were inappropriate
or were not identified
and/or response was
less than 250 words.
75.00 %
The discussion points
were identified and
described with good
accuracy and
appropriate
information was
identified and
discussed and/or
response was less
than 250 words
and/or at least 250
words.
100.00 %
The discussion
points were
identified and
described with
high accuracy and
all appropriate
information was
identified and
discussed clearly.
Response was at
least 250 words.
Responding
to other
students
0.00 %
Did not respond
to other students
25.00 %
Responded to other
students (one or
more), but
responses were trite
with no substance
(less than 100 words
each)
50.00 %
Responded to other
students (one or
more), but only one
response was
substantive and the
other (if given) was
trite with no
substance (less than
100 words)
100.00 %
Responded to two
or more other
students, both
responses were
substantive (over
100 words each)
Frequency
of
responses
0.00 %
Did not post in
the threaded
discussion
50.00 %
Posted on only 1
day of the week and
did not make the
initial post by
midnight on the third
day of the week
50.00 %
Posted on only 1 day
of the week or did not
make the initial post
by midnight on the
third day of the week
100.00 %
Posted on two or
more different
days of the week
and and made the
initial post by
midnight on the
third day of the
week
References 0.00 %
No references
were provided.
50.00 %
Students cited only 1
reference that were
used to support the
statements in the
initial thread.
75.00 %
Students cited
between 2-4
references that were
used to support the
statements in their
initial thread.
100.00 %
Students cited at
least 5 references
that were used to
support the
statements in their
initial thread.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight
50.00%
Weight
35.00%
Weight
5.00%
Weight
5.00%
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Belowexpectations Developing Competent Exemplary
Writing –
Grammar,
sentence
structure,
paragraph
structure,
spelling,
punctuation
0.00 %
5 or more
different errors in
sentence
structure,
paragraph
structure,
spelling, and
punctuation.
25.00 %
3-4 different errors in
sentence structure,
paragraph structure,
spelling, and
punctuation
50.00 %
1-2 different errors in
sentence structure,
paragraph structure,
spelling, and
punctuation
100.00 %
No errors in
sentence
structure,
Paragraph
structure, spelling,
and punctuation
PrintPrint Close WindowClose Window
Weight
5.00%
View Associated Items
javascript:associationListToggle( );
...
Rubric for Simulation Write-UpCriteriaBelow ExpectationsMe.docx
Rubric for Simulation Write-Up
Criteria
Below Expectations
Meets Expectations
Excellent
Content (25%)
Students did not completely answer most questions or gave answers that were irrelevant to questions
Students attempted to answer all questions but did not give relevant answers to many questions. Or students gave answers too succinctly.
Students answered all questions and all answers were complete and relevant.
Evidence
(25%)
Students did not use textbook or other outside sources at all to support answers
Students attempted to provide information from textbook or other sources with some interpretation. But not all information was relevant or complete.
Students provided relevant information from textbook, personal experience or other outside sources with appropriate interpretation.
Critical thinking
(25%)
Students did not clarify their perspectives or positions. No attempts were made to think critically about questions.
Students attempted to specify their positions, perspectives, or opinions about the assignment. Students attempted to think critically about the issue.
Students clearly stated their positions, perspectives or opinions about the assignment. Students also considered others’ points of view within position.
Readability
(25%)
Awkward phrasing, unskillful or inappropriate voice/tone and imprecise vocabulary.
Document is unreadable.
Phrasing is generally effective but inappropriate tone and imprecise vocabulary appear occasionally.
Phrasing is generally effective. Voice/tone and vocabulary are generally appropriate.
Points
3 points
4 points
5 points
Contemporary Issues in Diversity
Immersion Action Plan Proposal
Student Name:
What group from the spectrum of diversity do you plan to immerse yourself in?Justify why that group belongs in that category of the spectrum. (remember, you must have no previous direct contact with members of this group)
5pts
Why did you choose this group to immerse yourself in? Explain with detail.
(100 words minimum).
10pts
What is your immersion plan?Review rubric for details needed. (100 words minimum)
10pts
Think very candidly. Do you have any pre-conceived notions about the group of people you are going to immerse yourself in? If so, what are they? What are the stereotypes that you have heard about this group of people? (50 words minimum)
10pts
What are the special considerations that you will need to be aware of for this immersion experience?How will you adhere to each special consideration?Please include appropriate behavior/etiquette, way of dress, and respect.
(125 words minimum)
15pts
How do you know what the special considerations are? (25 words minimum)
10pts
What do you hope to learn and gain from this immersion experience? Be specific regarding the group you have chosen and how the experience could benefit you personally. (150 words minimum)
10pts
Discuss your anticipation of the experience. Are you nervous about anything? Wh ...
More Related Content
What's hot (8)
Introduction to University Debating - Chris Bisset
Introduction to University Debating - Chris Bisset
Similar to houdini paper
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 081921Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]D
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 08/19/21
Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]
Discussion Topic
Top of Form
Please refer to the resources provided on CDS Central. They are intended to help you engage effectively on the discussion board.
Due Thursday
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
· Discuss the concept of researcher bias. What are some ways a researcher might address these issues?
Include your own experience as well as two citations that align with or contradict your comments as sourced from peer-reviewed academic journals, industry publications, books, and/or other sources. Cite your sources using APA formatting.
Due Monday
Review others’ posts and respond to at least one of your course colleagues or your faculty member in 150 words. Why do you agree or disagree with their post? What in your professional experience supports your assertions?
Copyright 2019 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of FormBottom of FormBottom of Form
Discussion # 2 Due Fri 08/20/21
Wk 8 Discussion 2 [due Sat]
Discussion Topic
Top of Form
Please refer to the resources provided on CDS Central. They are intended to help you engage effectively on the discussion board.
Due Saturday
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
· Why is having a research protocol and a research script important in qualitative research?
Include your own experience as well as two citations that align with or contradict your comments as sourced from peer-reviewed academic journals, industry publications, books, and/or other sources. Cite your sources using APA formatting.
Due Monday
Review others’ posts and respond to at least one of your course colleagues or your faculty member in 150 words. Why do you agree or disagree with their post? What in your professional experience supports your assertions?
Copyright 2019 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: PRAC_6635_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric
Grid ViewList View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the skills identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.
Points:
Points Range:
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response provides ratings for all skills on the form.
Feedback:
...
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week9_Discussion_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or conci ...
Discussion Rub
Discussion Rubric: Undergraduate
Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful
connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own
thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance.
Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments
Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment.
For your initial post (1), you must do the following:
Compose a post of one to two paragraphs.
In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Eight, complete the initial post by Thursday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Take into consideration material such as course content and other
discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when
appropriate (make sure you are using proper citation methods for your
discipline when referencing scholarly or popular resources).
For your response posts (2), you must do the following:
Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial
post thread.
In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Eight, complete the two response posts by
Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating that “I agree”
or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion
prompt.
Rubric
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Comprehension Develops an initial post with an
organized, clear point of view or
idea using rich and significant detail
(100%)
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea using
adequate organization and
detail (85%)
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea but with
some gaps in organization and
detail (55%)
Does not develop an initial post
with an organized point of view
or idea (0%)
40
Timeliness Submits initial post on time
(100%)
Submits initial post one day late
(55%)
Submits initial post two or more
days late (0%)
10
Engagement Provides relevant and meaningful
response posts with clarifying
explanation and detail (100%)
Provides relevant response
posts with some explanation
and detail (85%)
Provides somewhat relevant
response posts with some
explanation and detail (55%)
Provides response posts that
are generic with little
explanation or detail (0%)
30
Writing
(Mechanics)
Writes posts that are easily
understood, clear, and concise
using proper citation methods
where applicable with no errors in
citations (100 ...
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week2_Discussion1_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or conc.
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$750.docx
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$75031-MarWilliamsEast$80031-MarJonesSouth$76531-MarWhiteWest$45631-MarJohnsonNorth$98731-MarTaylorWest$44331-MarYoungSouth$36831-MarHallEast$15930-JunSmithEast$1,20030-JunWilliamsEast$36930-JunJonesSouth$98030-JunWhiteWest$65030-JunJohnsonNorth$76030-JunTaylorWest$27830-JunYoungSouth$78030-JunHallEast$54730-SepSmithEast$69830-SepWilliamsEast$46730-SepJonesSouth$98330-SepWhiteWest$23730-SepJohnsonNorth$46930-SepTaylorWest$74030-SepYoungSouth$74930-SepHallEast$345
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week4_Discussion_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no .
Final Essay Global Inequality RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsTh
Final Essay Global Inequality Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Thoroughness, Thoughtfulness, Accuracy: Concepts and Arguments
25 pts
Perfect
23.75 pts
Excellent
Correctly uses concepts and arguments from relevant course materials to address the topic. Explanation is clear and thoughtful.
21.25 pts
Good
Correctly uses concepts and arguments from course materials to address the topic, but may not be complete, fully supported, or entirely clear.
18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Correctly uses some course concepts and arguments to address the topic. Explanation may be vague, incomplete, or lacking supporting evidence from texts
16.25 pts
Poor
Offers generally incorrect and/or incoherent explanation of concepts and arguments to address the topic.
0 pts
Missing
Does not address the topic and/or uses non-course materials.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Thoroughness, Thoughfulness, Accuracy: Using all of assigned materials.
25 pts
Perfect
23.75 pts
Excellent
Uses all of the required materials. Characterization of materials is accurate and thorough. Relevant points are made.
21.25 pts
Good
Uses the required materials, but characterization is not thorough.
18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Does not use all of the required materials. While some key points are addressed, others are ignored. Problems with accuracy.
16.25 pts
Poor
Makes little use of the required materials, misses key ideas and points, and/or inaccurately characterizes arguments.
0 pts
Missing
Does not make any meaningful reference to the required materials.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Thoroughness, Thoughfulness, Accuracy: Evidence
25 pts
Perfect
23.75 pts
Excellent
Uses course materials to present clear, complete, and accurate supporting evidence.
21.25 pts
Good
Uses evidence to present a clear and accurate explanation. Some key points are missing and/or unclear.
18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Uses some evidence, but may be vague, incomplete, or partially inaccurate.
16.25 pts
Poor
Largely inaccurate or incoherent presentation of evidence.
0 pts
Missing
Does not present evidence and/or uses non-course materials.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization: Introduction and Thesis
5 pts
Perfect
4.75 pts
Excellent
Clearly introduces assigned topic; identifies relevant questions/issues; presents specific thesis on assigned topic.
4.25 pts
Good
Clearly introduces assigned topic; clearly states thesis on assigned topic.
3.75 pts
Satisfactory
Vague introduction of assigned topic; vague thesis on assigned topic or thesis implied rather than stated.
3.25 pts
Poor
Introduces something other than assigned topic, thesis is not on topic, and/or introduction and thesis seriously misinterpret topic.
0 pts
Missing
Does not introduce topic or thesis.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization: Conclusion
5 pts
Perfect
4.75 pts
Excellent
Presents logical, clearly reasoned conclusions base ...
BUS 405 Effective Communication/tutorialrank.com
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Tutorial Purchased: 6 Times, Rating: A+
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 DQ 1 Blumes Formula, Allocation, and Selection
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 DQ 2 Money Market Funds
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 Quiz Chapters 1-4
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 1 Assignment Annualized Returns Chapter 3 problem 18
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 2 DQ 1 Primary and Secondary Markets
ASHFORD BUS 405 Week 2 DQ 2 Contrarian Investing
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
Discussion Rubric to follow
Outstanding performance
Excellent performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting:
Writing
6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
0 (0%) - 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
10 (10%) - 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts main discussion by due date
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
NA
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
First Response:
Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) - 9 (9%)
Respons ...
Discussion Post Levels of AchievementCriteria Belowexp
Discussion Post
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Belowexpectations Developing Competent Exemplary
One initial
major
response
(minimum
250 words)
to
discussion
question
0.00 %
Did not complete
this portion of
the assignment
or most of the
discussion
points were
inappropriate or
were not
identified and/or
response was
less than 250
words.
37.50 %
The discussion
points were
identified and
described but with
fair accuracy and
some of the
discussion points
were inappropriate
or were not identified
and/or response was
less than 250 words.
75.00 %
The discussion points
were identified and
described with good
accuracy and
appropriate
information was
identified and
discussed and/or
response was less
than 250 words
and/or at least 250
words.
100.00 %
The discussion
points were
identified and
described with
high accuracy and
all appropriate
information was
identified and
discussed clearly.
Response was at
least 250 words.
Responding
to other
students
0.00 %
Did not respond
to other students
25.00 %
Responded to other
students (one or
more), but
responses were trite
with no substance
(less than 100 words
each)
50.00 %
Responded to other
students (one or
more), but only one
response was
substantive and the
other (if given) was
trite with no
substance (less than
100 words)
100.00 %
Responded to two
or more other
students, both
responses were
substantive (over
100 words each)
Frequency
of
responses
0.00 %
Did not post in
the threaded
discussion
50.00 %
Posted on only 1
day of the week and
did not make the
initial post by
midnight on the third
day of the week
50.00 %
Posted on only 1 day
of the week or did not
make the initial post
by midnight on the
third day of the week
100.00 %
Posted on two or
more different
days of the week
and and made the
initial post by
midnight on the
third day of the
week
References 0.00 %
No references
were provided.
50.00 %
Students cited only 1
reference that were
used to support the
statements in the
initial thread.
75.00 %
Students cited
between 2-4
references that were
used to support the
statements in their
initial thread.
100.00 %
Students cited at
least 5 references
that were used to
support the
statements in their
initial thread.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight
50.00%
Weight
35.00%
Weight
5.00%
Weight
5.00%
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Belowexpectations Developing Competent Exemplary
Writing –
Grammar,
sentence
structure,
paragraph
structure,
spelling,
punctuation
0.00 %
5 or more
different errors in
sentence
structure,
paragraph
structure,
spelling, and
punctuation.
25.00 %
3-4 different errors in
sentence structure,
paragraph structure,
spelling, and
punctuation
50.00 %
1-2 different errors in
sentence structure,
paragraph structure,
spelling, and
punctuation
100.00 %
No errors in
sentence
structure,
Paragraph
structure, spelling,
and punctuation
PrintPrint Close WindowClose Window
Weight
5.00%
View Associated Items
javascript:associationListToggle( );
...
Rubric for Simulation Write-UpCriteriaBelow ExpectationsMe.docx
Rubric for Simulation Write-Up
Criteria
Below Expectations
Meets Expectations
Excellent
Content (25%)
Students did not completely answer most questions or gave answers that were irrelevant to questions
Students attempted to answer all questions but did not give relevant answers to many questions. Or students gave answers too succinctly.
Students answered all questions and all answers were complete and relevant.
Evidence
(25%)
Students did not use textbook or other outside sources at all to support answers
Students attempted to provide information from textbook or other sources with some interpretation. But not all information was relevant or complete.
Students provided relevant information from textbook, personal experience or other outside sources with appropriate interpretation.
Critical thinking
(25%)
Students did not clarify their perspectives or positions. No attempts were made to think critically about questions.
Students attempted to specify their positions, perspectives, or opinions about the assignment. Students attempted to think critically about the issue.
Students clearly stated their positions, perspectives or opinions about the assignment. Students also considered others’ points of view within position.
Readability
(25%)
Awkward phrasing, unskillful or inappropriate voice/tone and imprecise vocabulary.
Document is unreadable.
Phrasing is generally effective but inappropriate tone and imprecise vocabulary appear occasionally.
Phrasing is generally effective. Voice/tone and vocabulary are generally appropriate.
Points
3 points
4 points
5 points
Contemporary Issues in Diversity
Immersion Action Plan Proposal
Student Name:
What group from the spectrum of diversity do you plan to immerse yourself in?Justify why that group belongs in that category of the spectrum. (remember, you must have no previous direct contact with members of this group)
5pts
Why did you choose this group to immerse yourself in? Explain with detail.
(100 words minimum).
10pts
What is your immersion plan?Review rubric for details needed. (100 words minimum)
10pts
Think very candidly. Do you have any pre-conceived notions about the group of people you are going to immerse yourself in? If so, what are they? What are the stereotypes that you have heard about this group of people? (50 words minimum)
10pts
What are the special considerations that you will need to be aware of for this immersion experience?How will you adhere to each special consideration?Please include appropriate behavior/etiquette, way of dress, and respect.
(125 words minimum)
15pts
How do you know what the special considerations are? (25 words minimum)
10pts
What do you hope to learn and gain from this immersion experience? Be specific regarding the group you have chosen and how the experience could benefit you personally. (150 words minimum)
10pts
Discuss your anticipation of the experience. Are you nervous about anything? Wh ...
Due Date 1159 pm EST Sunday of Unit 1 Points 10.docx
Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 1
Points: 100
Overview:
A SWOT Analysis is used to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and
threats for a business. This analysis can be used to help in the creation of strategic
plans for the future. You will perform a SWOT Analysis for a real-world organization and
complete your assignment as a PowerPoint presentation.
Instructions:
Choose a real-world organization.
Perform a SWOT Analysis on the organization, creating a PowerPoint with your results.
Follow this format:
• Slide 1: Title slide with your name and the organization’s name.
• Slide 2: Mission of the company.
• Slide 3: Explain 4 to 6 strengths of the company (add more slides if needed).
• Slide 4: Explain 4 to 6 weaknesses of the company (add more slides if needed).
• Slide 5: Explain 4 to 6 opportunities of the company (add more slides if needed).
• Slide 6: Explain 4 to 6 threats for the company (add more slides if needed).
• Slide 7: Your conclusion. Provide your opinion on the strategic position of the
organization based on the findings of your SWOT.
• Slide 8: Reference page.
Requirements:
• Create a PowerPoint presentation, at least 8 slides.
• Include at least 2 valid, credible resources.
• Use APA formatting for citations, include in-text citations on slides.
Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.
BUS411 – Business Policy
Seminar
SWOT Analysis
Evaluation Rubric for SWOT Analysis Assignment
CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement
Proficient Exemplary
0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points
Content Elements of
the assignment
are not
addressed,
poorly
constructed,
lacking critical
thought, or
difficult to
evaluate.
Slides
somewhat
address the
elements of the
assignment in
though not in a
clear manner,
lacking some
critical thinking
and research.
Slides
generally
address all
elements of the
assignment in
a clear
manner,
showing
evidence of
critical thinking
and research.
Slides clearly
address all
elements of the
assignment in
a thorough and
detailed
manner.
Critical thinking
and research
are apparent.
Overall
Organization
Content is
difficult to
follow due to
lack of logical
structure or
flow.
Information
flow is
somewhat
logical,
may be difficult
to follow and
lack fluency.
Information
flow is
generally
logical and
easy to follow
but may lack
fluency.
Information is
presented in a
logical and
interesting
sequence that
is easy to
follow. Topics
flow smoothly
from one to
another with
appropriate
transitions.
Professionali
sm
Slides are
unclear,
overloaded, or
lack a
consistent
design style.
Slides and
supporting
notes are
presented in a
somewhat
consistent
manner but
lack an
effective
design style,
and
inconsistencies
are present.
Slides .
Case Study Two Guidelines and RubricPrompt Think about a time.docx
Case Study Two Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: Think about a time you received a product or service and you were not satisfied with the quality of the service or product. For this case study, you will
focus on the four components of customer-relationship management that are essential in total quality management. This case study will examine your viewpoint as the customer and put you in the seat of the quality manager.
1. Complaint Resolution. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: Explain the nature of the quality issue for your service or product and provide a description of how you went about addressing your quality complaint with the service provider or product manufacturer. Were you satisfied with how your complaint was handled?
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain why complaints or defects should be viewed as a good thing from a company standpoint.
2. Feedback. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: What type of feedback did you get from the service provider or product manufacturer? Were you asked, or did you participate in any type of solicited customer feedback such as a survey?
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain the benefit of using customer feedback to improve the company’s customer service and quality. Explain which customer feedback tool you believe would provide the most benefit for your company.
3. Guarantees. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: What type of guarantee did you receive based on your quality issue? Was the guarantee consistent with the five elements of an effective guarantee? Please explain why or why not.
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain the importance of having an effective guarantee policy from a marketing and quality standpoint.
4. Corrective Action. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Based on the quality issue presented in this case study, you have been asked to lead a team to improve the process and implement a corrective action. Your thoughts and reasoning can be hypothetical for this aspect of the case study. You are encouraged to do research to determine elements of an effective corrective action.
Provide an explanation for what happened for the quality issue to occur.
Describe the steps you would take to resolve the quality issue so it does not occur again.
Requirements of Submission: The case study assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one- inch margins. Each case study should be one to two pages in length. Include at least two sources of research and follow APA guidelines for citations and references.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.
Critical Elements
Exemplary (100%)
Proficient (85%)
Needs Improvement (55%)
Not Evident ...
Email Anatomy: How to Get Top Tier Links
Verve Search’s Outreach team sent over 100,000 emails last year, earning linked coverage on sites like CNN, BBC, The Guardian & more. Crucially, there was no black book of contacts: in fact there was no prior relationship with at least 90% of the journalists they got links from.
In this talk Alex will deconstruct examples of emails his team have sent, in order to demonstrate that getting top-tier links is possible for anyone with a gmail account and a story worth sharing.
SECOND (FINAL) EXAMPlease answer the following exam questi.docx
SECOND (FINAL) EXAM
Please answer the following exam questions. The exam has three (3) sections. Your exam must be completed in paragraph and essay format. The identification section is worth 20% of the exam grade, the short-essay question is worth 30%, and the long-essay question 50%. Please consider the grading rubric that follows the questions when you construct your answers. The strongest answers will adhere to the basic requirements listed in the grading rubric. Remember, too, that if you must put all material into your own words, and if you quote, you must consistently cite your source (my lectures, textbook, etc.). Material on this exam is reflective of the themes and content developed since the midterm and used in the last several quizzes and paper. Lifting from previously submitted work constitutes plagiarism and will result in a failed exam.
Your exam must be completed in an essay format. You must also submit your exam according to the following format: typed, double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman font with one-inch margins. Late exam submissions will be penalized accordingly (per the syllabus). The exam is due on Thursday, December 14th by 11:59 pm, via TURNITIN, and serves as your final. If you do not submit a completed exam, you will not pass the class.
Section I: Identification – (20% of the exam, or 5% each)
Compose short but full and complete paragraph answers (6-8 sentences in length) that describe the historical significance of four (4) of the fifteen (15) terms below. Historical significance is more than a simple definition. Your terms should clearly show detailed evidence for how they are important in both the context of the historical period in question and broader course themes.
Choose 4 from the 15 terms below:
Tennis Court Oath
The Berlin Conference
Giuseppe Mazzini
mercantilism
Realpolitik/Weltpolitik
Manifest Destiny
Tanzimat reforms
Zionism
War Capitalism
Religious Toleration/Tolerance
Olympe de Gouges
Creole
Simón Bolívar
Social Contract
The Enlightenment
Section II: Short Essay – (30% of the exam)
Compose a short, two-three - (2-3) - paragraph essay (8-10 sentences in length each) in answer to one (1) of the following questions:
Choice A – Define nationalism in nineteenth-century Europe. Give and critically analyze two country-specific examples in your answer.
Choice B – Compare “old” and “new” imperialism in the context of the early modern and modern West.
Choice C – Explain the transition from a mercantilist to a capitalist economy in the late-early-modern West and use Sven Beckert’s book to support your answer.
Choice D – How did absolutist rulers in 18th century Europe respond to the Enlightenment?
Choice E – What impact did European colonization (from the 1500s-1800s) have on non-western populations around the world?
Section II: Long Essay – (50% of the exam)
Compose a long, four to five - (4-5) - paragraph essay (8-10 sentences in length each) in answer to .
Similar to houdini paper (19)
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 081921Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]D
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 081921Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]D
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric.docx
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$750.docx
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$750.docx
Final Essay Global Inequality RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsTh
Final Essay Global Inequality RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsTh
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
Discussion Post Levels of AchievementCriteria Belowexp
Discussion Post Levels of AchievementCriteria Belowexp
Rubric for Simulation Write-UpCriteriaBelow ExpectationsMe.docx
Rubric for Simulation Write-UpCriteriaBelow ExpectationsMe.docx
Due Date 1159 pm EST Sunday of Unit 1 Points 10.docx
Due Date 1159 pm EST Sunday of Unit 1 Points 10.docx
Case Study Two Guidelines and RubricPrompt Think about a time.docx
Case Study Two Guidelines and RubricPrompt Think about a time.docx
SECOND (FINAL) EXAMPlease answer the following exam questi.docx
SECOND (FINAL) EXAMPlease answer the following exam questi.docx
More from ambrelee
More from ambrelee (20)
Recently uploaded
What are the main advantages of using HR recruiter services.pdf
HR recruiter services offer top talents to companies according to their specific needs. They handle all recruitment tasks from job posting to onboarding and help companies concentrate on their business growth. With their expertise and years of experience, they streamline the hiring process and save time and resources for the company.
VAT Registration Outlined In UAE: Benefits and Requirements
Vat Registration is a legal obligation for businesses meeting the threshold requirement, helping companies avoid fines and ramifications. Contact now!
https://viralsocialtrends.com/vat-registration-outlined-in-uae/
Tata Group Dials Taiwan for Its Chipmaking Ambition in Gujarat’s Dholera
The Tata Group, a titan of Indian industry, is making waves with its advanced talks with Taiwanese chipmakers Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC) and UMC Group. The goal? Establishing a cutting-edge semiconductor fabrication unit (fab) in Dholera, Gujarat. This isn’t just any project; it’s a potential game changer for India’s chipmaking aspirations and a boon for investors seeking promising residential projects in dholera sir.
Visit : https://www.avirahi.com/blog/tata-group-dials-taiwan-for-its-chipmaking-ambition-in-gujarats-dholera/
一比一原版加拿大渥太华大学毕业证（uottawa毕业证书）如何办理
一模一样【q/微:1954292140】【加拿大渥太华大学毕业证（uottawa毕业证书）成绩单Offer】【q/微:1954292140】（留信学历认证永久存档查询）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【q/微:1954292140】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【q/微:1954292140】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：可来公司面谈，可签订合同，会陪同客户一起到教育部认证窗口递交认证材料，客户在教育部官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
Memorandum Of Association Constitution of Company.ppt
www.seribangash.com
A Memorandum of Association (MOA) is a legal document that outlines the fundamental principles and objectives upon which a company operates. It serves as the company's charter or constitution and defines the scope of its activities. Here's a detailed note on the MOA:
Contents of Memorandum of Association:
Name Clause: This clause states the name of the company, which should end with words like "Limited" or "Ltd." for a public limited company and "Private Limited" or "Pvt. Ltd." for a private limited company.
https://seribangash.com/article-of-association-is-legal-doc-of-company/
Registered Office Clause: It specifies the location where the company's registered office is situated. This office is where all official communications and notices are sent.
Objective Clause: This clause delineates the main objectives for which the company is formed. It's important to define these objectives clearly, as the company cannot undertake activities beyond those mentioned in this clause.
www.seribangash.com
Liability Clause: It outlines the extent of liability of the company's members. In the case of companies limited by shares, the liability of members is limited to the amount unpaid on their shares. For companies limited by guarantee, members' liability is limited to the amount they undertake to contribute if the company is wound up.
https://seribangash.com/promotors-is-person-conceived-formation-company/
Capital Clause: This clause specifies the authorized capital of the company, i.e., the maximum amount of share capital the company is authorized to issue. It also mentions the division of this capital into shares and their respective nominal value.
Association Clause: It simply states that the subscribers wish to form a company and agree to become members of it, in accordance with the terms of the MOA.
Importance of Memorandum of Association:
Legal Requirement: The MOA is a legal requirement for the formation of a company. It must be filed with the Registrar of Companies during the incorporation process.
Constitutional Document: It serves as the company's constitutional document, defining its scope, powers, and limitations.
Protection of Members: It protects the interests of the company's members by clearly defining the objectives and limiting their liability.
External Communication: It provides clarity to external parties, such as investors, creditors, and regulatory authorities, regarding the company's objectives and powers.
https://seribangash.com/difference-public-and-private-company-law/
Binding Authority: The company and its members are bound by the provisions of the MOA. Any action taken beyond its scope may be considered ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the company and therefore void.
Amendment of MOA:
While the MOA lays down the company's fundamental principles, it is not entirely immutable. It can be amended, but only under specific circumstances and in compliance with legal procedures. Amendments typically require shareholder
ENTREPRENEURSHIP TRAINING.ppt for graduating class (1).ppt
entreprenuership training for graduating students
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-premier-platform-for-investors-in-india
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Buy Verified PayPal Account | Buy Google 5 Star Reviews
Buy Verified PayPal Account
Looking to buy verified PayPal accounts? Discover 7 expert tips for safely purchasing a verified PayPal account in 2024. Ensure security and reliability for your transactions.
PayPal Services Features-
🟢 Email Access
🟢 Bank Added
🟢 Card Verified
🟢 Full SSN Provided
🟢 Phone Number Access
🟢 Driving License Copy
🟢 Fasted Delivery
Client Satisfaction is Our First priority. Our services is very appropriate to buy. We assume that the first-rate way to purchase our offerings is to order on the website. If you have any worry in our cooperation usually You can order us on Skype or Telegram.
24/7 Hours Reply/Please Contact
usawebmarketEmail: support@usawebmarket.com
Skype: usawebmarket
Telegram: @usawebmarket
WhatsApp: +1(218) 203-5951
USA WEB MARKET is the Best Verified PayPal, Payoneer, Cash App, Skrill, Neteller, Stripe Account and SEO, SMM Service provider.100%Satisfection granted.100% replacement Granted.
Improving profitability for small business
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdf
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Recently uploaded (20)
What are the main advantages of using HR recruiter services.pdf
What are the main advantages of using HR recruiter services.pdf
VAT Registration Outlined In UAE: Benefits and Requirements
VAT Registration Outlined In UAE: Benefits and Requirements
Tata Group Dials Taiwan for Its Chipmaking Ambition in Gujarat’s Dholera
Tata Group Dials Taiwan for Its Chipmaking Ambition in Gujarat’s Dholera
Memorandum Of Association Constitution of Company.ppt
Memorandum Of Association Constitution of Company.ppt
ENTREPRENEURSHIP TRAINING.ppt for graduating class (1).ppt
ENTREPRENEURSHIP TRAINING.ppt for graduating class (1).ppt
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-premier-platform-for-investors-in-india
falcon-invoice-discounting-a-premier-platform-for-investors-in-india
Buy Verified PayPal Account | Buy Google 5 Star Reviews
Buy Verified PayPal Account | Buy Google 5 Star Reviews
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
houdini paper
- 2. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ Terms Comments Heading and Title 25 pts
- 3. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ Terms Comments Heading and Title 25 pts Name Class Name Period Number Date on the left of paper
- 4. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ Terms Comments Heading and Title 25 pts Name Class Name Period Number Date on the left of paper Format
- 5. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ Terms Comments Heading and Title 25 pts Name Class Name Period Number Date on the left of paper Format 25 points
- 6. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ Terms Comments Heading and Title 25 pts Name Class Name Period Number Date on the left of paper Format 25 points Skip lines and neatness
- 12. Terms Comments 3 Body Paragraphs: 75 pts
- 13. Terms Comments 3 Body Paragraphs: 75 pts Three detailed paragraphs written with transitions that explain different aspects of Houdini and are interesting for the reader.
- 14. Terms Comments Conclusion: 25 points
Editor's Notes
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.
- Though Houdini died young, he lived an interesting life. Even though Houdini died in 1926, he is still a fascinating entertainer. Houdini was a masterful entertainer who still mesmerizes people today.