HIS 2017 Dewi Daniels- bridging the gap between manned and unmanned

•

0 likes•393 views

The last few years have seen rapid growth in the civil market for Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAVs). Callen-Lenz has been at the forefront of both UAV operations, including Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), and the development of reliable flight control systems through our subsidiary, SkyCircuits Ltd. Commercial UAVs offer high levels of functionality at low cost, but most have been designed to consumer standards that do not address issues such as reliability, system redundancy or design integrity within their flight control system designs. If UAVs are going to be routinely used for operations in non-segregated airspace under BVLOS conditions, they will need to demonstrate a comparable level of safety to manned aircraft; this is to ensure safe autonomous operations that can be relied upon to provide separation from other airspace users (manned and unmanned). Key to this safe and reliable operation will be the flight control system used to command and control the UAV, which will itself depend on software that will need to be developed to relevant aerospace standards. Callen-Lenz also see potential for cross-fertilisation between the manned and unmanned domains. For example, imagine a manned aircraft that is as easy to fly as a drone, and can even operate autonomously. This session will present how Callen-Lenz is developing a family of autopilots designed to meet the objectives of DO-178C/ED-12C up to and including Level A. These will underpin safe reliable UAV operations in BVLOS conditions, but also have the appropriate safety and functionality to support manned flight in both conventional aircraft and in emerging domains such as personal air vehicles.

Software

UAS Market Growth
Slide 2Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Present Uses of Commercial Small UAS (FAA)
Slide 3Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

UAS Safety Concerns
Slide 4Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

EASA Regulatory Framework
OPEN
Low Risk
- MTOM < 25 kg
- Height < 120 m
- VLOS
SPECIFIC
Increased Risk
CERTIFIED
Comparable to manned aviation
e.g.
- Large or complex UAS
operating continuously over
open assemblies of people
- Large or complex UAS
operating BVLOS in high-
density airspace
- UAS used for transport of
people
- UAS used for the carriage of
dangerous goods
Slide 5Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Autopilot Market
Slide 6Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary
Full Authority Autopilot for Manned Aircraft
Limited Authority Autopilot for Manned Aircraft
Autopilot for Unmanned Aircraft
High Integrity Autopilot for Unmanned Aircraft in the
Specific and Certified Categories

Callen-Lenz DO-178C Level A Process
A-4.2 Accuracy & Consistency
A-4.3 HW Compatibility
A-4.4 Verifiability
A-4.5 Conformance
A-4.7 Algorithm Accuracy
System
Requirements
High-Level
Requirements
Software
Architecture
Source Code
Executable
Object Code
(A-2: 3, 4, 5)
(A-2: 7)
A-3.1 Compliance
A-3.6 Traceability
A-3.2 Accuracy & Consistency
A-3.3 HW Compatibility
A-3.4 Verifiability
A-3.5 Conformance
A-3.7 Algorithm Accuracy
A-4.9 Consistency
A-4.10 HW Compatibility
A-4.11 Verifiability
A-4.12 Conformance
A-4.13 Partition Integrity
(A-2: 6)
A-5.3 Verifiability
A-5.4 Conformance
A-5.6 Accuracy & Consistency
A-5.8 PDI Complete & Correct
A-5.9 PDI Verified
(A-2: 1, 2)
A-4.1 Compliance
A-4.6 Traceability
A-4. 8 Architecture Compatibility
A-5.1 Compliance
A-5.5 Traceability
A-5.2 Compliance
A-6.3 Compliance
A-6.4 Robustness
A-6.1 Compliance
A-6.2 Robustness
A-6.5 Compatible With Target
Low-Level
Requirements
A-5.7 Complete & Correct
Required
Required with independence
Not required
A-7.1 Procedures are correct
A-7.2 Results are Correct
A-7.3 Test Coverage of HLRs
A-7.4 Test Coverage of LLRs
A-7.5 MC/DC
A-7.6 Decision Coverage
A-7.7 Statement Coverage
A-7.8 Coupling Coverage
A-7.9 Untraceable object code
Copyright 2012 Aeronautique Associates Limited
DOORS
DOORS
Simulink Simulink
C
Formal Methods
Back-to-Back Testing
Review
Simulation
Slide 7Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Callen-Lenz DO-178C Level D Process
A-4.2 Accuracy & Consistency
A-4.3 HW Compatibility
A-4.4 Verifiability
A-4.5 Conformance
A-4.7 Algorithm Accuracy
System
Requirements
High-Level
Requirements
Software
Architecture
Source Code
Executable
Object Code
(A-2: 3, 4, 5)
(A-2: 7)
A-3.1 Compliance
A-3.6 Traceability
A-3.2 Accuracy & Consistency
A-3.3 HW Compatibility
A-3.4 Verifiability
A-3.5 Conformance
A-3.7 Algorithm Accuracy
A-4.9 Consistency
A-4.10 HW Compatibility
A-4.11 Verifiability
A-4.12 Conformance
A-4.13 Partition Integrity
(A-2: 6)
A-5.3 Verifiability
A-5.4 Conformance
A-5.6 Accuracy & Consistency
A-5.8 PDI Complete & Correct
A-5.9 PDI Verified
(A-2: 1, 2)
A-4.1 Compliance
A-4.6 Traceability
A-4. 8 Architecture Compatibility
A-5.1 Compliance
A-5.5 Traceability
A-5.2 Compliance
A-6.3 Compliance
A-6.4 Robustness
A-6.1 Compliance
A-6.2 Robustness
A-6.5 Compatible With Target
Low-Level
Requirements
A-5.7 Complete & Correct
Required
Required with independence
Not required
A-7.1 Procedures are correct
A-7.2 Results are Correct
A-7.3 Test Coverage of HLRs
A-7.4 Test Coverage of LLRs
A-7.5 MC/DC
A-7.6 Decision Coverage
A-7.7 Statement Coverage
A-7.8 Coupling Coverage
A-7.9 Untraceable object code
Copyright 2012 Aeronautique Associates Limited
DOORS
DOORS
Rust
Test
Review
Slide 8Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Future Directions in UAS
• Increased regulation
• Sharing airspace safely
• More dependable platforms
• BVLOS operations
• Logistics
• Telecoms
• Passenger carrying
Slide 9Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Bridging the Gap
• What if?
– There were a manned aircraft that’s as easy to fly
as a drone?
– And is capable of autonomous operation
Slide 10Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Helicopter Flight Controls
Slide 11Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Conventional Helicopter Simulator
Slide 12Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Odin Helicopter Simulator
Slide 13Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Autorotation
Slide 14Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Autorotation
Slide 15Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Autorotation
Slide 16Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Autorotation
Slide 17Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Autorotation
Slide 18Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Autorotation
Slide 19Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Any Questions?
Slide 20Callen-Lenz Associates Proprietary

Rajeshkanna V has over 7 years of experience as a Software Engineer specializing in avionics and automotive testing. He has extensive experience developing test cases, procedures, and scripts using tools like MATLAB Simulink. He is proficient in requirements management, configuration management, and standards like DO-178B. Rajeshkanna V currently works as an Assistant Manager and has worked on projects for clients such as Rockwell Collins, UTC Aerospace Systems, Bombardier, and Meggitt Control Systems. He holds a B.E. in Computer Science and Engineering and several technical certifications.

Avionics System Standards

waad Jamal Almuqbali

Avionics system Standard

Jeran Rai

ibrahim cv10a

Ibrahim Fadeel

Ibrahim Ali is an automation engineer from Egypt seeking a position that allows career growth. He has over 10 years of experience working with distributed control systems including upgrading DCS models and commissioning oil and gas plants. He is proficient in programming PLCs, calibrating instruments, and troubleshooting various automation equipment. Ibrahim holds certificates in fields like risk assessment, flow measurement, and process control.

How to Plan for Line Controls and Integration

Nercon

The document discusses how to plan for effective line integration. It covers key considerations like environment parameters, equipment interfaces, safety, system architecture, information management, networks, acquisition costs, cost of ownership, and system reliability. It emphasizes selecting the right control hardware and networks to tie integrated systems together safely and efficiently while enabling information and diagnostics. The scope of machinery integration is expanding from individual machines to complete production lines.

Case Study_IV&V of AutomaticFlightControlPanel.pdf

Oak Systems

3-axis (Pitch, Roll, and Yaw) simplex and 4-axis AFCS (Pitch, Roll, and Yaw & Collective) digital Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) on LUH are used to provide stability, controllability, and autopilot modes for ease of flying. The AFCS consists of an Automatic Flight Control Computer (AFCC) and an Automatic Flight Control Panel (AFCP). The AFCC is the core of the AFCS. The Automatic Flight Control Panel (AFCP) is the main man-machine interface between the pilot and AFCC for control commands, status indicators, and alphanumeric displays of AFCS functions. The AFCP software receives commands from the panel push-button control switch, transmits these commands to the AFCC through the ARINC429 channel, and receives the commands from the AFCC through the ARINC429 channel. The received ASCII data is shown on an alphanumeric display.

t51_process-safety-solution-best-meets-your-needs.pdf

hadjijkarim

- Rockwell Automation provides process safety platforms to help customers meet functional safety standards like IEC 61508 and IEC 61511. - They offer a portfolio of products that support different safety integrity levels (SIL) from SIL 1 to SIL 3, and provide both fail-safe and fault-tolerant options. - Key platforms include GuardLogix for integrated safety systems, AADvance for distributed safety systems, and Trusted for high availability triplex modular redundancy applications.

Nishar resume

MD NISHAR

This document summarizes a presentation on model-based design and analysis. It discusses how model-based development and automated analysis can be combined to significantly reduce costs and improve quality for safety-critical software. Specific techniques discussed include modeling system requirements, simulating models, translating models to formal specification languages for automated analysis using model checkers and theorem provers, and reusing models. Case studies are presented where this approach found 10 times more errors than traditional methods and reduced development costs and cycle times by half.

OSSJP/ALS19: The Road to Safety Certification: Overcoming Community Challeng...

The Linux Foundation

Safety certification is one of the essential requirements for software to be used in highly regulated industries. Besides technical and compliance issues (such as ISO 26262 vs IEC 611508) transitioning an existing project to become more easily safety certifiable requires significant changes to development practices within an open source project. In this session, we will lay out some challenges of making safety certification achievable in open source and the Xen Project. We will outline the process the Xen Project has followed thus far and highlight lessons learned along the way. The talk will primarily focus on necessary process, tooling changes and community challenges that can prevent progress. We will be offering an in-depth review of how Xen Project is approaching this challenging goal and try to derive lessons for other projects and contributors.

Download PCNSE Dumps PDF - Pass4sureClub.com

llise7401

Prepare effectively for the PCNSE (Palo Alto Networks Certified Network Security Engineer) exam with Pass4sureClub comprehensive PCNSE Question Answers . Our meticulously curated content covers all the essential topics, including firewall technologies, threat prevention strategies, VPN configurations, and network troubleshooting methodologies. With our up-to-date and expertly crafted study material, you'll gain a deep understanding of Palo Alto Networks' network security solutions, empowering you to excel in the exam and succeed in real-world scenarios. Whether you're a seasoned professional seeking certification validation or a newcomer aiming to kickstart your cybersecurity career, Pass4sureClub provides the tools and resources you need to achieve your goals and advance in the field of network security.

Avionics System Standards.pdf

JERANRAI1

Nishar_Resume

MD NISHAR

This resume is for Md Nishar, an IT professional with over 4.9 years of experience in software testing. He has extensive experience testing safety critical avionics systems according to DO-178B standards. Some of his skills and experiences include unit testing, software integration testing, model based testing, debugging, requirements and configuration management tools. He has worked on projects for companies like Rockwell Collins, Goodrich, and Gulfstream testing components like head up displays, electric brake controls, and touch screen controllers. His education includes a Bachelor's degree in electronics engineering.

Ultimate PCNSE Practice Dumps by Test4Parctice.pdf

Mike Robert

Prabhaharan_$CV

Prabhaharan Balasubramani

This document contains the resume of Prabhaharan Balasubramani seeking a position in the corporate world utilizing his 5.8 years of experience in the aerospace and defense industry. He has a Master's degree in Avionics Engineering and a Bachelor's degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering. His experience includes developing requirements documentation, software design, testing, and problem solving for avionics systems. He is proficient in the software development lifecycle and has experience with programming languages and development tools.

3 martin heininger - software unit testing autonomous cars verified by aero...

Ievgenii Katsan

HEICON is a specialized engineering company providing consulting and development support for software-based embedded systems. The document compares best practices for unit testing from the aerospace industry to the automotive industry. Key differences are that aerospace has a clearer separation of requirements and architecture, requires 100% structural test coverage, and interprets standards like DO-178C more uniformly, while interpretation of ISO 26262 in automotive varies more. Adopting aerospace practices like requirement-based unit testing could help automotive identify weaknesses and achieve high coverage cost-effectively.

Explore Advanced CA Release Automation Configuration Topics

CA Technologies

20070925 03 - La qualimétrie en environnement industriel (Schneider automation)

LeClubQualiteLogicielle

This document discusses quality initiatives for industrial software and firmware at Schneider Electric. It outlines the company's focus on reliability, architecture, maintainability, and evolvability through practices like increasing automated unit testing, using UML models, reducing complexity, and ensuring modularity. Quality is managed through processes for escalating issues, releasing new versions and service packs, and using tools for static analysis, code coverage, complexity metrics, and coding rule checks. The goal is continuous quality improvement to meet rising customer expectations.

T89 introductiontofunctionalsafetyformachinery

Vo Quoc Hieu

This document provides an introduction to functional safety for machinery. It defines functional safety and explains that it involves ensuring automatic actions occur to reach a safe state. The document discusses relevant functional safety standards like ISO 13849 and IEC 61508. It also examines functional safety concepts like risk assessments, safety integrity levels, safety elements involving structure, reliability, diagnostics and systematic capability. The document uses an example safety circuit diagram to demonstrate functional safety concepts like input channel fault detection.

CV Nagaraju Sreeram

nagaraju sreeram

Nagaraju Sreeram has over 9 years of experience in software testing of embedded systems. He has expertise in manual and automated testing, requirements analysis, and ensuring compliance with regulations. Currently he is a Software Test Engineer at Scientific Games, where he tests gaming platforms and protocols to meet regulatory standards for international markets. Previously he developed testing plans and verified systems like an Air Management System for GE Aviation and navigation equipment for HAL, in compliance with standards like DO-178B Level A.

Case Study on IV&V of the Landing Gear Controller

Oak Systems

RUSTOM II is a Medium-Altitude Long-Endurance (MALE) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with an endurance of 24 hours and the ability to fly up to 25000 feet altitude. It has multiple payload capabilities to support both daytime and nighttime operations. The retractable landing gear system consists of dual redundant microcontrollers. The Landing Gear Controller (LGC) is required to execute and monitor the retraction, deployment, and brake sequence of the landing gear based on the command received from the Flight Control Computer (RFCC). The LGC is connected to the RFCC through the MIL1553B interface. The RFCC acts as a bus controller (BC), and the LGC acts as a remote terminal (RT), with software-programmable RT addresses 22 (active) and 23 (standby). However, provision is made to set the RT addresses through hardware. LGC has dual redundant 32-bit microcontrollers in the main/hot standby configuration. When the main controller fails, the hot standby controller executes the operations. The main controller and standby controller are interfaced via a cross-channel data link (CCDL) asynchronous RS422 interface. LGC is connected to the RFCC via the 1553B bus for receiving commands, to the nose and main landing gears through analog input via ADC and duplex discrete I/O, and to the hydraulic motor pump via analog input and discrete output. The LGC software performs the following functionalities:. Perform modes of operation like retraction, deployment, brake, emergency deployment, and emergency brake based on the RFCC command. Activate the landing gear subsystem assemblies like the hydraulic power pack, retraction, deployment, brake, bypass, and emergency valves. Monitor the subsystem assembly, like wheel speed, weight on the wheel, hydraulic pressure, valve pressure, and actuator end-limit switches, and post the status to the RFCC. Perform Power on Self Test (POST), Initiated Pre-flight Built-In Test (PBIT), and Continuous Built-In Test (CBIT) functionalities. Output the parameters to telemetry.

5.13 Software management control

lpapadop

DO178B is a document published by EUROCAE that provides guidance for determining if aircraft software will perform reliably. It outlines software certification procedures where manufacturers provide evidence to regulatory authorities like the CAA that the software was designed and tested according to regulations. The document also describes software criticality categories from Level A (catastrophic failures) to Level E (no effect) based on the impact of potential failures. It covers topics like software design, development, verification, configuration management, and certification plans.

HP_HPE6-A73_April_2023-v1.2.pdf

CCIEHOMER

DevOps dans la vraie vie : Retours d'expériences

Microsoft

Rahul_Ramani_Profile

Rahul Ramani

Rahul Ramani has over 3 years of experience in functional verification of ASICs and FPGAs using SystemVerilog and OVM methodologies. He has worked on projects involving DAL level-A components for avionics and has experience developing testbenches, achieving code and functional coverage, and verifying protocols like Serial RapidIO. Rahul is skilled in Verilog, VHDL, SystemVerilog, OVM, and scripting languages like Perl. He has experience with verification tools like QuestaSim and debugging tools like Modelsim. Rahul has also worked on verification projects involving DO-254 standards where he created compliance documents and reviewed verification artifacts.

Code coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspective

Engineering Software Lab

Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective

Engineering Software Lab

The document discusses code coverage from the perspective of DO178B certification. It explains that testing of code coverage is essential for safety-critical software certification. It describes the five levels of software criticality in DO178B from Level A to E, with A being the highest. The level of testing required varies according to the software's criticality level, from no structural testing needed for Level D to modified condition/decision coverage required for Level A.

Aviq Company Introduction

mojazu

Aviq Design Sdn Bhd is an engineering services company formed in 2004 comprising experienced aerospace engineers. Their vision is to be a center of excellence for engineering services, and their mission is to be competitive in engineering through developing capabilities, people, and products. They offer services including CAD/CAM/CAE, engineering design, structural and mechanical design, engineering analysis, and project management. They have experience with projects for companies such as BAE Systems, Airbus, and Bombardier.

HIS 2017 Mark Batty-Industrial concurrency specification for C/C++

HIS 2017 Dewi Daniels- bridging the gap between manned and unmanned

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to HIS 2017 Dewi Daniels- bridging the gap between manned and unmanned

Similar to HIS 2017 Dewi Daniels- bridging the gap between manned and unmanned (20)

More from jamieayre

More from jamieayre (17)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

HIS 2017 Dewi Daniels- bridging the gap between manned and unmanned