This document discusses heuristics and biases in human judgment and decision-making. It provides examples of common heuristics like framing, anchoring, availability, and conjunction fallacy. It also discusses critiques of the heuristics and biases research from scholars like Gigerenzer, Lopes, and Hogarth. Gigerenzer argues that experiments are not representative and people can perform better with different framings. Lopes argues results are oversold and heuristics often give the right answer. Hogarth argues the research overlooks the dynamic nature of judgment and importance of feedback.