The report recommends a hold on Hertz stock with a one-year target price of $13.86, a 40% increase from the current price. While Hertz offers great return potential, the hold recommendation is issued because the target price is lower than analyst consensus and the stock has high risk. Key growth drivers are the low oil price environment benefiting airlines and car rentals, and the planned spinoff of Hertz's equipment rental business. Major risks include accounting issues, price pressure, and competition from car sharing services.
- Greenback Securities recommends buying Hertz Global Holdings stock with a target price of $30.73 per share, representing a 23% total return over 12 months.
- Key drivers for the recommendation include recovering economic conditions in the US fostering the airline industry, synergies from acquisitions, operating efficiencies, and the promising spin off of equipment rental business HERC.
- The presentation provides an overview of Hertz, the car rental industry, Hertz's financial performance and outlook, valuation analysis, and investment risks.
Delta Airlines pitch document outlines the investment rationale for investing in Delta. It summarizes that Delta will benefit from increasing disposable income and air travel demand. Lower oil prices also reduce Delta's fuel costs. The document values Delta using comparable company analysis and a discounted cash flow valuation model. It sets a target price of $65.10 per share based on the models, representing a total implied return of 33.10% from the current stock price.
The document recommends buying shares of Hertz (HTZ) with a target price of $35, representing 62% upside. Key reasons for the recommendation include Hertz's consistent growth through travel industry expansion and brand growth from its acquisition of Dollar and Thrifty, as well as expected value creation from spinning off its equipment rental business. Financial projections show revenue and profit margin expansion through 2018 driven by market share gains, improved efficiency, and diversification.
MPF reported a 1H08 NPAT of $15.97M, up 73.9% over 1H07. Normalised NPAT was $12.6M, up 16.3% on 1H07. Total assets increased 9.3% to $439.2M, driven by $13.9M in unlisted revaluation gains and $20.3M in unlisted investments, offset by a $16.5M decrease in listed securities. NTA remained at $1.43 per unit. Normalized EPU grew 13.1% and distributions grew 3.4% to 5.5cpu. Retained earnings increased 11.3% to $14.8M and
- The document recommends that AAN shareholders vote in favor of the Scheme Proposal put forward by Babcock & Brown/Singapore Power consortium to acquire AAN.
- It analyzes the five consideration alternatives available to shareholders and notes that shareholders should choose based on individual tax, yield, liquidity and risk preferences after consulting financial advisors.
- The default consideration includes a majority cash payment along with securities in BBI, BBP, BBW funds and APA, maintaining ongoing exposure to energy infrastructure sector but triggering a CGT event for most of the consideration.
High-Quality Investment Bankers should pursue Strategy #1 and make an offer to purchase ITGroup for $1 billion. This strategy has the highest expected returns (IRR) of 22.3-26.3% and keeps ITGroup as a single entity. The capital structure would include $110.2 million in cash, $376.4 million in senior debt, $100.4 million in mezzanine debt, and $547.3 million in equity. This leveraged buyout values ITGroup at a transaction value to EBITDA multiple of 10-10.5x.
CFA Research Team 1 initiates coverage of Esterline Technologies Corporation with a HOLD recommendation and $83 one-year price target. Key points include: ESL has limited organic growth potential and relies on acquisitions for growth; valuation models indicate a fair value of $83 per share, making it slightly underpriced; management aims to increase operating margins but progress has been slow; main risks include cuts to defense spending and economic downturns. The recommendation is based on limited long-term aerospace growth prospects and bounded benefits from ESL's acquisition strategy.
The document provides an executive summary and analysis of a company. The key points are:
1) The company has high market share in targeted niches and a stable financial position with a solid balance sheet and strong banking relationships.
2) An analysis of the company's financials, industry, valuation, risks, and growth strategy is presented.
3) Using discounted cash flow and relative valuation analyses, the company's target share price is estimated to be $81.2.
- Greenback Securities recommends buying Hertz Global Holdings stock with a target price of $30.73 per share, representing a 23% total return over 12 months.
- Key drivers for the recommendation include recovering economic conditions in the US fostering the airline industry, synergies from acquisitions, operating efficiencies, and the promising spin off of equipment rental business HERC.
- The presentation provides an overview of Hertz, the car rental industry, Hertz's financial performance and outlook, valuation analysis, and investment risks.
Delta Airlines pitch document outlines the investment rationale for investing in Delta. It summarizes that Delta will benefit from increasing disposable income and air travel demand. Lower oil prices also reduce Delta's fuel costs. The document values Delta using comparable company analysis and a discounted cash flow valuation model. It sets a target price of $65.10 per share based on the models, representing a total implied return of 33.10% from the current stock price.
The document recommends buying shares of Hertz (HTZ) with a target price of $35, representing 62% upside. Key reasons for the recommendation include Hertz's consistent growth through travel industry expansion and brand growth from its acquisition of Dollar and Thrifty, as well as expected value creation from spinning off its equipment rental business. Financial projections show revenue and profit margin expansion through 2018 driven by market share gains, improved efficiency, and diversification.
MPF reported a 1H08 NPAT of $15.97M, up 73.9% over 1H07. Normalised NPAT was $12.6M, up 16.3% on 1H07. Total assets increased 9.3% to $439.2M, driven by $13.9M in unlisted revaluation gains and $20.3M in unlisted investments, offset by a $16.5M decrease in listed securities. NTA remained at $1.43 per unit. Normalized EPU grew 13.1% and distributions grew 3.4% to 5.5cpu. Retained earnings increased 11.3% to $14.8M and
- The document recommends that AAN shareholders vote in favor of the Scheme Proposal put forward by Babcock & Brown/Singapore Power consortium to acquire AAN.
- It analyzes the five consideration alternatives available to shareholders and notes that shareholders should choose based on individual tax, yield, liquidity and risk preferences after consulting financial advisors.
- The default consideration includes a majority cash payment along with securities in BBI, BBP, BBW funds and APA, maintaining ongoing exposure to energy infrastructure sector but triggering a CGT event for most of the consideration.
High-Quality Investment Bankers should pursue Strategy #1 and make an offer to purchase ITGroup for $1 billion. This strategy has the highest expected returns (IRR) of 22.3-26.3% and keeps ITGroup as a single entity. The capital structure would include $110.2 million in cash, $376.4 million in senior debt, $100.4 million in mezzanine debt, and $547.3 million in equity. This leveraged buyout values ITGroup at a transaction value to EBITDA multiple of 10-10.5x.
CFA Research Team 1 initiates coverage of Esterline Technologies Corporation with a HOLD recommendation and $83 one-year price target. Key points include: ESL has limited organic growth potential and relies on acquisitions for growth; valuation models indicate a fair value of $83 per share, making it slightly underpriced; management aims to increase operating margins but progress has been slow; main risks include cuts to defense spending and economic downturns. The recommendation is based on limited long-term aerospace growth prospects and bounded benefits from ESL's acquisition strategy.
The document provides an executive summary and analysis of a company. The key points are:
1) The company has high market share in targeted niches and a stable financial position with a solid balance sheet and strong banking relationships.
2) An analysis of the company's financials, industry, valuation, risks, and growth strategy is presented.
3) Using discounted cash flow and relative valuation analyses, the company's target share price is estimated to be $81.2.
The document examines how the top performing upstream oil and gas companies are able to deliver higher returns on capital employed compared to their peers. It analyzes 74 of the largest global oil and gas companies based on data from 2006-2012. The top performers significantly outperformed the industry average, achieving a 38% return on capital employed versus 21% for the industry. The key differentiators of the top companies were selectivity in capital investment rather than velocity of spending, higher capital productivity through generating more revenue per dollar invested, and a strong focus on operating excellence through lower production costs. While the top companies demonstrated a positive relationship between returns and pursuit of growth, capital productivity was declining across the industry as exploration moved to more challenging areas.
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2014Mercer Capital
"Business development companies are an important and growing source of funding for middle market companies. Along with private equity and other investment funds, BDCs provide billions of dollars of investment capital to private companies in every segment of the economy.
For over thirty years, Mercer Capital has met the valuation needs of the same middle market companies to which BDCs and other funds provide capital.
This quarterly newsletter tracks the financial and stock market performance of the public BDCs."
This presentation summarizes JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s business operations, financial performance, competitive position, and valuation. Key points include:
- JPMorgan is the largest US bank by market cap and has a large physical branch and ATM network across the US and globally.
- It has various business segments including investment banking, asset management, and retail banking.
- JPMorgan was profitable during the financial crisis while its competitors reported large losses. It has a strong capital position.
- Analysts value JPMorgan at $54.74/share based on dividend discount and relative P/E valuation models, representing a buy rating.
Capital Structure and Payout Policies of P&GRawan Nadeem
P&G's capital structure and payout policies were analyzed over 5 years. Regarding capital structure, P&G had low operating and financial leverage, protecting it from business and financial risks. Debt ratios fluctuated over time but generally decreased. Relationship between EBIT, EPS, and debt ratios was positive. For payout policy, P&G paid stable quarterly dividends. Stock price typically fell on ex-dividend dates but rose before on dividend announcements, encouraging purchases. Price movements sometimes differed from announcements, guided by other market forces. P&G is desirable for dividend investors due to payouts despite stock price stability in its sector.
Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2Lin Zhangde
The document provides a recommendation and analysis for Impact Capital Partners regarding the potential acquisition of ParentCo. It recommends that Impact Capital Partners make an offer to purchase ParentCo and its subsidiary FashionCo based on quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis values ParentCo's media business at $392 million and FashionCo at $180 million based on comparable company and precedent transaction multiples. The recommendation is supported by projections showing the acquisition generates positive returns meeting Impact Capital Partners' investment criteria.
CyrusOne reported strong 4Q results that beat estimates, with revenue up 1.5% quarter-over-quarter and 20.2% year-over-year. Full year results showed growth of 25.6% in revenue, 22.1% in EBITDA, 42.2% in FFO, and 51.3% in AFFO. Guidance for 2015 implies mid-point revenue growth of 14.0% and EBITDA and FFO growth of around 12%. The company continues to execute well and achieve above-market growth while trading at a discount to peers. Leasing was solid in 4Q and for the full year, up 33.3% year-over-year
This document provides an overview of Southwest Airlines' business operations and financial performance. Some key points:
- Southwest operates a fleet of 694 planes, employs 46,000 people, and serves 97 destinations in the US and nearby international markets.
- It has adopted a low-cost business model and focuses on point-to-point routes rather than hubs. The acquisition of AirTran introduced some international flights and services at major airports.
- Major competitors include American, Delta, United, and JetBlue. Southwest saw revenue of $17 billion in 2012 and carried over 134 million passengers as the fourth largest US airline.
- Financial ratios show solid current ratio and times interest earned. Projections estimate 9
Cipla Q2 disappoints, gearing up for strong H2FY15EIndiaNotes.com
Cipla reported disappointing sales, EBITDA, and PAT for Q2FY15 due to lower institutional sales, exports declining 5% YoY, and aggressive setup costs. However, strong license income from Salix partially offset the PAT decline. Management expects sales and EBITDA growth in H2FY15 to overcome the shortfall, driven by increased EU sales, South African tender wins, and export growth. The document provides an overview of Cipla's Q2 results and financials, with analysis of growth drivers and maintaining an Accumulate rating.
IDFC Focused Equity Fund _Fund presentationJubiIDFCEquity
This document provides an overview of the IDFC Focused Equity Fund, an open-ended equity scheme that invests in a maximum of 30 stocks with a multi-cap focus. The fund aims to generate superior returns by identifying the right stocks and allocating sufficiently to high-conviction ideas. It takes a focused approach of investing in high-quality, high-growth companies, while maintaining a well-diversified portfolio across market caps and sectors. The fund is currently overweight in commodities, information technology and telecom sectors.
This document analyzes the security of an investment in Under Armour. It provides financial highlights and ratios for 2013-2016 and projections through 2020. Key points include high debt/equity ratios that pose financial risk, increasing assets but decreasing asset turnover, and recommendations to hold the stock with a price target of $30.63 based on discounted cash flow valuation. Risks discussed are related to finances, markets, and operations.
The document presents a comparative study on wealth maximization in Tata Motors and Ashok Leyland from 2015-2020. It finds that while both companies' economic value, market value, and cash flow returns fluctuated over the period, Ashok Leyland performed better overall based on metrics like EVA, MVA, and CFROI. It provides recommendations for each company to improve shareholder wealth and suggests investors consider Ashok Leyland for greater returns.
The document provides financial statements and key performance indicators for a company over several quarters and fiscal years. It includes income statements, balance sheets, cash flow statements, and common financial ratios analyzed over time. Charts are presented to show trends in revenue, costs, profits, assets, liabilities, cash flows, return on assets, debt ratios and other metrics. Projections for income statements and balance sheets are also included out to several future years.
The proxy fight for board seats at Oshkosh Corporation is underway, with Icahn Associates nominating six directors. While OSK's stock performance has lagged peers, the company has significant defense business exposure. Icahn will argue OSK has failed to execute on acquisitions or develop business segments. Shareholders will evaluate if change is needed and if Icahn's nominees can add value, considering four have Icahn ties raising independence questions.
American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL) is poised for growth due to its large, established market position and planned $5 billion annual capital expenditures to modernize its fleet. This will give it younger, more fuel efficient aircraft sooner than competitors and expand capacity. The merger is creating synergies that will improve margins. However, AAL faces risks from its debt load and negative cash flows from fleet investment. Volatility in oil prices also impacts margins. The analysis provides a target price of $48.22 based on comparable company and discounted cash flow valuations.
This document provides highlights and financial results from Localiza Rent a Car S.A.'s 2006 presentation. Some key points:
1. The company experienced strong growth in 2006 with a 31% increase in average fleet size and 29% revenue growth.
2. Profitability also increased with net income growing 32% and EBITDA margin declining slightly from 32.6% to 27.3%.
3. Localiza continued to invest heavily in expanding its footprint, doubling used car points of sale and increasing rental locations by 24%.
4. The company maintained a consistent spread between return on invested capital and weighted average cost of capital, generating increased economic value added of 29.9% in
This document contains financial information for Delta Airlines, including its capital structure, ownership structure, dividend policy, and key financial ratios. It also provides details on Delta's business model as an airline operating in the air transportation industry, along with inherent risks in the industry. The summary is:
Delta Airlines operates as an airline providing scheduled air transportation. It has a capital intensive business model with high fixed costs and risks including economic downturns, fuel price fluctuations, and safety concerns. The company is majority owned by institutions and uses debt financing. It recently initiated a dividend policy and share buybacks to return cash to shareholders.
This document provides an analysis of Southwest Airlines (LUV) and makes the recommendation to HOLD the stock. It summarizes LUV's business model, competitive advantages, financial performance, and valuation. While LUV previously had a cost advantage due to its low-cost point-to-point structure, the analysis finds this advantage has diminished as other carriers have adopted similar models. It also notes concerns around LUV's strained employee relations and upcoming union negotiations which could increase costs. Based on the valuation methods used, the analysis sees 8% downside for LUV's stock price.
Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) is an Indian engineering conglomerate engaged in engineering, construction, and manufacturing. The document provides an overview of L&T and the engineering industry in India. It summarizes L&T's financial performance and position, highlighting strong revenue and order inflow growth. Calculations include projected financial statements, weighted average cost of capital, discounted cash flow valuation, and target price of Rs. 2,413.60 per share for L&T.
This document provides an overview of the ParentCo proposal, which includes options to buy or sell subsidiaries FashionCo, ApparelCo, and MediaCo, as well as restructuring ParentCo. Valuations are presented for each subsidiary using DCF and comparable company analyses. The proposal suggests carving out ApparelCo as its own public entity while retaining ownership in MediaCo to use its shares for acquisitions. This would increase transparency, attract new investors, and improve performance accountability across subsidiaries.
ACG Presentation for the Citizenship by Investment & International Residence ...acgpdx1
A presentation delivered by Aginsky Consulting Group (ACG) at "Citizenship by Investment and International Residence" Conference in London on October 30th-31st, 2013. ACG was a silver sponsor of the event. In this presentation ACG discusses the EB-5 Program, a government sponsored program which allows foreign investors to gain access to U.S. residency in exchange for an investment of $0.5M-$1M, focusing on the direct investment route.
ITGroup is a well-positioned IT consulting and semiconductor firm that generates $538M in revenue in 2015. The company has two business units - the core IT Services unit, which drives 80% of revenue and has potential for expansion, and the SSIT unit, which generates 20% of revenue but has lower margins and slower growth. The document outlines four strategic options for ITGroup: conducting an IPO as is, divesting the SSIT unit, remaining privately held, or postponing the IPO to first enhance firm value through operational improvements. The recommendation is to postpone the IPO to implement cross-selling initiatives and geographic expansion that could increase enterprise value by $305M, leading to higher valuation multiples when
The document examines how the top performing upstream oil and gas companies are able to deliver higher returns on capital employed compared to their peers. It analyzes 74 of the largest global oil and gas companies based on data from 2006-2012. The top performers significantly outperformed the industry average, achieving a 38% return on capital employed versus 21% for the industry. The key differentiators of the top companies were selectivity in capital investment rather than velocity of spending, higher capital productivity through generating more revenue per dollar invested, and a strong focus on operating excellence through lower production costs. While the top companies demonstrated a positive relationship between returns and pursuit of growth, capital productivity was declining across the industry as exploration moved to more challenging areas.
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2014Mercer Capital
"Business development companies are an important and growing source of funding for middle market companies. Along with private equity and other investment funds, BDCs provide billions of dollars of investment capital to private companies in every segment of the economy.
For over thirty years, Mercer Capital has met the valuation needs of the same middle market companies to which BDCs and other funds provide capital.
This quarterly newsletter tracks the financial and stock market performance of the public BDCs."
This presentation summarizes JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s business operations, financial performance, competitive position, and valuation. Key points include:
- JPMorgan is the largest US bank by market cap and has a large physical branch and ATM network across the US and globally.
- It has various business segments including investment banking, asset management, and retail banking.
- JPMorgan was profitable during the financial crisis while its competitors reported large losses. It has a strong capital position.
- Analysts value JPMorgan at $54.74/share based on dividend discount and relative P/E valuation models, representing a buy rating.
Capital Structure and Payout Policies of P&GRawan Nadeem
P&G's capital structure and payout policies were analyzed over 5 years. Regarding capital structure, P&G had low operating and financial leverage, protecting it from business and financial risks. Debt ratios fluctuated over time but generally decreased. Relationship between EBIT, EPS, and debt ratios was positive. For payout policy, P&G paid stable quarterly dividends. Stock price typically fell on ex-dividend dates but rose before on dividend announcements, encouraging purchases. Price movements sometimes differed from announcements, guided by other market forces. P&G is desirable for dividend investors due to payouts despite stock price stability in its sector.
Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2Lin Zhangde
The document provides a recommendation and analysis for Impact Capital Partners regarding the potential acquisition of ParentCo. It recommends that Impact Capital Partners make an offer to purchase ParentCo and its subsidiary FashionCo based on quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis values ParentCo's media business at $392 million and FashionCo at $180 million based on comparable company and precedent transaction multiples. The recommendation is supported by projections showing the acquisition generates positive returns meeting Impact Capital Partners' investment criteria.
CyrusOne reported strong 4Q results that beat estimates, with revenue up 1.5% quarter-over-quarter and 20.2% year-over-year. Full year results showed growth of 25.6% in revenue, 22.1% in EBITDA, 42.2% in FFO, and 51.3% in AFFO. Guidance for 2015 implies mid-point revenue growth of 14.0% and EBITDA and FFO growth of around 12%. The company continues to execute well and achieve above-market growth while trading at a discount to peers. Leasing was solid in 4Q and for the full year, up 33.3% year-over-year
This document provides an overview of Southwest Airlines' business operations and financial performance. Some key points:
- Southwest operates a fleet of 694 planes, employs 46,000 people, and serves 97 destinations in the US and nearby international markets.
- It has adopted a low-cost business model and focuses on point-to-point routes rather than hubs. The acquisition of AirTran introduced some international flights and services at major airports.
- Major competitors include American, Delta, United, and JetBlue. Southwest saw revenue of $17 billion in 2012 and carried over 134 million passengers as the fourth largest US airline.
- Financial ratios show solid current ratio and times interest earned. Projections estimate 9
Cipla Q2 disappoints, gearing up for strong H2FY15EIndiaNotes.com
Cipla reported disappointing sales, EBITDA, and PAT for Q2FY15 due to lower institutional sales, exports declining 5% YoY, and aggressive setup costs. However, strong license income from Salix partially offset the PAT decline. Management expects sales and EBITDA growth in H2FY15 to overcome the shortfall, driven by increased EU sales, South African tender wins, and export growth. The document provides an overview of Cipla's Q2 results and financials, with analysis of growth drivers and maintaining an Accumulate rating.
IDFC Focused Equity Fund _Fund presentationJubiIDFCEquity
This document provides an overview of the IDFC Focused Equity Fund, an open-ended equity scheme that invests in a maximum of 30 stocks with a multi-cap focus. The fund aims to generate superior returns by identifying the right stocks and allocating sufficiently to high-conviction ideas. It takes a focused approach of investing in high-quality, high-growth companies, while maintaining a well-diversified portfolio across market caps and sectors. The fund is currently overweight in commodities, information technology and telecom sectors.
This document analyzes the security of an investment in Under Armour. It provides financial highlights and ratios for 2013-2016 and projections through 2020. Key points include high debt/equity ratios that pose financial risk, increasing assets but decreasing asset turnover, and recommendations to hold the stock with a price target of $30.63 based on discounted cash flow valuation. Risks discussed are related to finances, markets, and operations.
The document presents a comparative study on wealth maximization in Tata Motors and Ashok Leyland from 2015-2020. It finds that while both companies' economic value, market value, and cash flow returns fluctuated over the period, Ashok Leyland performed better overall based on metrics like EVA, MVA, and CFROI. It provides recommendations for each company to improve shareholder wealth and suggests investors consider Ashok Leyland for greater returns.
The document provides financial statements and key performance indicators for a company over several quarters and fiscal years. It includes income statements, balance sheets, cash flow statements, and common financial ratios analyzed over time. Charts are presented to show trends in revenue, costs, profits, assets, liabilities, cash flows, return on assets, debt ratios and other metrics. Projections for income statements and balance sheets are also included out to several future years.
The proxy fight for board seats at Oshkosh Corporation is underway, with Icahn Associates nominating six directors. While OSK's stock performance has lagged peers, the company has significant defense business exposure. Icahn will argue OSK has failed to execute on acquisitions or develop business segments. Shareholders will evaluate if change is needed and if Icahn's nominees can add value, considering four have Icahn ties raising independence questions.
American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL) is poised for growth due to its large, established market position and planned $5 billion annual capital expenditures to modernize its fleet. This will give it younger, more fuel efficient aircraft sooner than competitors and expand capacity. The merger is creating synergies that will improve margins. However, AAL faces risks from its debt load and negative cash flows from fleet investment. Volatility in oil prices also impacts margins. The analysis provides a target price of $48.22 based on comparable company and discounted cash flow valuations.
This document provides highlights and financial results from Localiza Rent a Car S.A.'s 2006 presentation. Some key points:
1. The company experienced strong growth in 2006 with a 31% increase in average fleet size and 29% revenue growth.
2. Profitability also increased with net income growing 32% and EBITDA margin declining slightly from 32.6% to 27.3%.
3. Localiza continued to invest heavily in expanding its footprint, doubling used car points of sale and increasing rental locations by 24%.
4. The company maintained a consistent spread between return on invested capital and weighted average cost of capital, generating increased economic value added of 29.9% in
This document contains financial information for Delta Airlines, including its capital structure, ownership structure, dividend policy, and key financial ratios. It also provides details on Delta's business model as an airline operating in the air transportation industry, along with inherent risks in the industry. The summary is:
Delta Airlines operates as an airline providing scheduled air transportation. It has a capital intensive business model with high fixed costs and risks including economic downturns, fuel price fluctuations, and safety concerns. The company is majority owned by institutions and uses debt financing. It recently initiated a dividend policy and share buybacks to return cash to shareholders.
This document provides an analysis of Southwest Airlines (LUV) and makes the recommendation to HOLD the stock. It summarizes LUV's business model, competitive advantages, financial performance, and valuation. While LUV previously had a cost advantage due to its low-cost point-to-point structure, the analysis finds this advantage has diminished as other carriers have adopted similar models. It also notes concerns around LUV's strained employee relations and upcoming union negotiations which could increase costs. Based on the valuation methods used, the analysis sees 8% downside for LUV's stock price.
Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) is an Indian engineering conglomerate engaged in engineering, construction, and manufacturing. The document provides an overview of L&T and the engineering industry in India. It summarizes L&T's financial performance and position, highlighting strong revenue and order inflow growth. Calculations include projected financial statements, weighted average cost of capital, discounted cash flow valuation, and target price of Rs. 2,413.60 per share for L&T.
This document provides an overview of the ParentCo proposal, which includes options to buy or sell subsidiaries FashionCo, ApparelCo, and MediaCo, as well as restructuring ParentCo. Valuations are presented for each subsidiary using DCF and comparable company analyses. The proposal suggests carving out ApparelCo as its own public entity while retaining ownership in MediaCo to use its shares for acquisitions. This would increase transparency, attract new investors, and improve performance accountability across subsidiaries.
ACG Presentation for the Citizenship by Investment & International Residence ...acgpdx1
A presentation delivered by Aginsky Consulting Group (ACG) at "Citizenship by Investment and International Residence" Conference in London on October 30th-31st, 2013. ACG was a silver sponsor of the event. In this presentation ACG discusses the EB-5 Program, a government sponsored program which allows foreign investors to gain access to U.S. residency in exchange for an investment of $0.5M-$1M, focusing on the direct investment route.
ITGroup is a well-positioned IT consulting and semiconductor firm that generates $538M in revenue in 2015. The company has two business units - the core IT Services unit, which drives 80% of revenue and has potential for expansion, and the SSIT unit, which generates 20% of revenue but has lower margins and slower growth. The document outlines four strategic options for ITGroup: conducting an IPO as is, divesting the SSIT unit, remaining privately held, or postponing the IPO to first enhance firm value through operational improvements. The recommendation is to postpone the IPO to implement cross-selling initiatives and geographic expansion that could increase enterprise value by $305M, leading to higher valuation multiples when
The document provides an analysis of Rackspace Hosting Inc. and the information technology services industry. It finds that while Rackspace has experienced high growth historically, their financial ratios tell conflicting stories and the effects of management's response to their 2013 performance decline won't be seen until 2014 numbers emerge. It also notes the information technology services industry continues growing faster than GDP, though individual company growth rates vary. The analysis concludes there is too much uncertainty in Rackspace's current price given various valuation methods capture a wide range of assumptions.
ParentCo is considering whether to sell ApparelCo, acquire FashionCo, or maintain the status quo. Quantitative analysis was conducted including a SWOT analysis, Porter's Five Forces analysis, and valuation of the companies. Based on the analyses, ParentCo should sell a majority stake in ApparelCo, as it has weaknesses including few synergies with MediaCo and lower profit margins. Selling ApparelCo would allow ParentCo to divest a non-core asset.
MBA Investment Bankers is presenting valuation and strategic options to the board of Khakis 'R Us, a publicly traded men's casual clothing retailer. Key information includes that Khakis has strong financial performance but a languishing stock price compared to competitors. MBA performed a discounted cash flow valuation that estimated the fair value of Khakis' stock at $10.50 per share. Comparable company and precedent transaction analyses provided supporting valuation ranges. MBA will recommend whether Khakis should sell the company or pursue an alternative strategic path.
2015.01.21 ACG cup (M&A case competition)Allison Noel
The document analyzes investment opportunities for MediaCo, a media and apparel company. It evaluates bidding $111M for FashionCo, selling ApparelCo, splitting MediaCo and ApparelCo, conducting a stock buyback, and purchasing a synergistic media firm. The best options are to bid for FashionCo or, if rejected, split MediaCo/ApparelCo and conduct a stock buyback and debt-financed restructuring to increase returns. RadyAdvisors recommends bidding for FashionCo or pursuing other growth opportunities if rejected.
ACG Cup 2nd round case competition final presentationliujingyi
This document provides an analysis and recommendation for a potential leveraged buyout (LBO) of Topnotch Technologies. Key points include:
- The proposed LBO would generate an internal rate of return (IRR) of 30.24% over 5 years.
- Managers are key to the success of the deal and their continued involvement is important. They would receive equity rollover and incentive packages.
- The initial offer price is $170 million, financed with senior notes, management equity rollover, and equity from Clearshot Investment Bank.
- An exit strategy after 5 years assumes selling the company at 8.9x EBITDA, the same multiple as the initial valuation.
- The
Stock pitch of Herc Rentals, traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Target price created through a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis with the EBITDA multiple approach.
Sources: Company Website, Company Filings, Thomson One, RBC Capital Markets, KeyBank Capital Markets, GAMCO Investors, Yahoo! Finance, Independent, PwC, Oxford Economics,
The document provides an overview of Localiza, the 25th most valuable brand in Brazil. It summarizes the company's history since 1973, outlines its main business divisions of car rental, fleet rental, and used car sales. It highlights Localiza's competitive advantages such as scale in vehicle purchases, brand recognition, and innovation which allow it to raise funds at better rates and maintain high customer satisfaction. Financial information shows Localiza has leading profitability metrics like ROIC compared to competitors, demonstrating strong performance.
Localiza is the 25th most valuable brand in Brazil. The presentation provides an overview of Localiza's integrated business platform, which includes car rental, fleet rental, used car sales, and franchising divisions. It discusses Localiza's competitive advantages such as its scale in purchasing cars, network of branches across Brazil, innovation in services, and high client satisfaction ratings. Financial information shows that Localiza has higher profitability measures like return on invested capital compared to its competitors, supported by its diversified business model.
Running head FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION QUESTIONS .docxwlynn1
Running head: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 10
Financial Management Discussion Questions
Gregory Finney
Strayer University
January 11, 2019
Financial Management Discussion Questions
Stock Exchanges in the U.S
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the National Association for Stock Dealers Automated (NASDAQ) are the two largest stock exchanges in the United States. Both of them deal with large volumes of stock exchanges daily. However, these two stock exchanges have some differences including operational differences, the size and number of listings and different perspectives. With regards to the size and number of listings, NYSE has at least 2,400 firms with a combined market capitalization of 21.3 trillion and home to blue chip firms like Ford Motors, General Electric and Walmart. Nasdaq, on the other hand, has more firms than NYSE with a market capitalization of $200 million and is also home to large tech firms like Apple, Facebook and Amazon. From operational perspective, NYSE is an auction market while Nasdaq is a dealer market. With regards to different perspective, investors consider NYSE as a stock market for the tried and true securities while Nasdaq is seen as a market for growth-oriented tech stocks (Desjardins, 2017).
Free Cash Flow
According to Brigham and Ehrhardt (2017), free cash flow is the amount of cash that a business generates, after accounting for the non-current capital assets investments. Mathematically;
Free Cash Flow =Cash from operating activities-Capital expenditure
Apple Incorporation’s Free Cash Flow
An analysis of Apple Incorporation’s 2014 annual report indicates that the company’s cash flow from operations for the years ending September 28, 2014 and 2013 were $59,713 million and $53,666 million, respectively. Capital expenditures were $9,571 million and $8,165 million for the years ending 2014 and 2013, respectively (SEC, 2014a).
Free Cash flow;
For the year ending 2013;
Free Cash Flow= $53,666-$8,165
=$45,501 million
For the year ending 2014;
Free cash flow =$59,713-$9,571
=$50,142 million
Apple Incorporation had more cash inflows from its operating activities, because of its positive free cash flow, that could be spent on new capital investments. The increase in free cash flow from $45,501 million to $50,142 million between 2013 and 2014 is a sign of good financial performance.
Ford Motors Corporation’s Free Cash Flow
An analysis of Ford Motors Corporation’s 2014 annual report indicates that the company’s cash flow from operations for the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2014 were $10,444 million and $14,507 million, respectively. Capital expenditures were $ 6,597 million and $7,463 million for the years ending 2013 and 2014, respectively (SEC, 2014b).
Free Cash flow;
For the year ending 2013;
Free Cas.
C3 Took KitTHE HOME DEPOTTool Kit for Analysis of Financial Statem.docxRAHUL126667
C3 Took KitTHE HOME DEPOTTool Kit for Analysis of Financial Statements Financial statements are analyzed by calculating certain key ratios and then comparing them with the ratios of other firms and by examining the trends in ratios over time. We can also combine ratios to make the analysis more revealing, those indicated below are exceptionally useful for this type of analysis. RATIO ANALYSIS (Section 3.1)Input Data:20172016Year-end common stock price$23.00$26.00Year-end shares outstanding (in millions)5050Tax rate40%40%After-tax cost of capital11.0%10.8%Lease payments$28$28Required sinking fund payments$20$20Balance Sheets(in millions of dollars)Assets20172016Cash and equivalents$3,595$2,538Short-term investments$0$0Accounts receivable$1,952$2,029Inventories$12,748$12,549Other current assets$638$608 Total current assets$18,933$17,724Goodwill$22,075$21,914Other assets$1,246$1,235Net plant and equipment$2,275$2,093Total assets$44,529$42,966Liabilities and equityAccounts payable$7,244$7,000Short-term debt$1,559$710Sales taxes payable$520$508Deferred revenue$1,805$1,669Income tax payable$54$25Current Installments of long-term debt$1,202$542Other accrued expenses$2,170$2,195Accruals$1,640$1,484 Total current liabilities$16,194$14,133Long-term debt, excluding current installments$24,267$22,349Deferred income taxes$440$296Long-term bonds$2,174$1,855 Total liabilities$43,075$38,633Common stock (400,000 shares)$89$88Paid-in capital$10,192$9,787Retained earnings$39,935$35,519Treasury stock-$48,196-$40,194Accumulated other comprehensive loss-$566-$867Total common equity$1,454$4,245Total liabilities and equity$44,529$42,966Income Statements(in millions of dollars)20172016Net sales$100,904.0$94,595.0 Operating costs$66,548.0$62,282.0Earnings before interest, taxes, depr. & amort. (EBITDA)$34,356.0$32,313.0Selling, general and adminsitrative$17,864.0$17,132.0 Depreciation$1,811.0$1,754.0 Amortization$0.0$0.0 Depreciation and amortization$19,675.0$18,886.0Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)$14,681.0$13,427.0 Less interest $983.0$936.0Earnings before taxes (EBT)$13,698.0$12,491.0Provision for income taxes$5,068.0$4,534.0Net income before preferred dividends$8,630.0$7,957.0 Preferred dividends$0.0$0.0Net income available to common stockholders$8,630.0$7,957.0Common dividends$0.0$0.0Addition to retained earnings$8,630.0$7,957.0Calculated Data: Operating Performance and Cash Flows20172016Net operating working capital (NOWC)$9,411.0$8,632.0Total operating capital$11,686.0$10,725.0Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)$8,808.6$8,056.2Net Cash Flow (Net income + Depreciation)$28,305.0$26,843.0Operating Cash Flow (OCF)$28,483.6$26,942.2Free Cash Flow (FCF)$7,847.6N/ACalculated Data: Per-share Information20172016Earnings per share (EPS)$172.60$159.14Dividends per share (DPS)$0.00$0.00Book value per share (BVPS)$29.08$84.90Cash flow per share (CFPS)$566.10$536.86Free cash flow per share (FCFPS)$156.95N/ALIQUIDITY RATIOS (Section 3.2)Indu ...
Localiza is the 25th most valuable brand in Brazil and the largest car rental company in the country. It has three main business divisions: car rental, fleet rental, and used car sales. The company has a competitive advantage through its scale in purchasing cars, network of locations across Brazil, innovation in services, and ability to generate higher returns than competitors. Localiza aims to continue expanding its integrated business platform and maintaining its leadership position in the car rental market.
Localiza is the 25th most valuable brand in Brazil. The document discusses Localiza's business divisions including car rental, fleet rental, and used car sales. It provides an overview of the company's history and growth, integrated business platform, financial performance of each division, and competitive advantages in areas like purchasing power, innovation, and used car sales distribution. Localiza has achieved scale in Brazil and investment grade credit ratings, demonstrating strong profitability and returns over its 42 year history.
Localiza is the largest car rental company in Brazil with a market share of over 23%. It operates in three main divisions: car rental, fleet rental, and used car sales. The company has a competitive advantage through its scale in purchasing fleet vehicles which allows it to acquire cars at better prices. It also has the largest network of rental locations across more branches and cities in Brazil compared to its competitors. Localiza focuses on innovation through new technologies and service enhancements to improve customer satisfaction and maintain its premium brand position in the industry.
Localiza is the 25th most valuable brand in Brazil operating in the car rental, fleet rental, and used car sales industries. It has a large integrated business platform with competitive advantages in raising capital at better rates, bulk purchasing of vehicles, extensive national distribution network, customer satisfaction and innovation. Localiza has a market leading position in Brazil's car rental market with over 25% share and experiences high profitability from its rental divisions due to over 40 years of experience managing fleet assets and generating value.
Localiza is the 25th most valuable brand in Brazil. The document provides an overview of Localiza's integrated business platform, which includes car rental, fleet rental, used car sales, and franchising divisions. It discusses Localiza's competitive advantages in raising money, buying cars, renting cars, and selling used cars. Localiza has a large scale of operations, investment grade credit ratings, purchasing power from OEMs, extensive network of locations, high customer satisfaction ratings, and ability to innovate. Financial information is presented showing Localiza's profitability and returns are higher than competitors.
We recommend Cintas Corporation as a HOLD with a 12-month price target of $81, representing an upside of 0.77% from the current price of $81.32. Key factors leading to a neutral outlook include limited opportunities for organic growth, continued emphasis on cross-selling and acquisitions to improve margins, and an aggressive capital return plan including share buybacks.
Company X provides a document outlining key concepts in value based management including metrics like NOPAT, FCF, ROIC, WACC, and EVA. It discusses these concepts over 3 pages and provides examples of calculations for Company X in 2014-2016. Key metrics like ROIC increased substantially from 20.39% in 2014 to 60.31% in 2016 while WACC also increased from 15.19% to 24.35% over this period, leading to an expanding ROIC-WACC spread and indicating improved value creation.
Investor roadshow presentation july 2017 final (1)TrueBlueInc
This document provides a 3-page summary of TrueBlue, Inc. It includes key facts about the company such as its annual revenue, number of clients served, industries served, and specialized service offerings. The summary highlights TrueBlue's growth strategies such as the PeopleReady transition, expanding scope of services, and new mobile app technology. Financial information is also presented, including adjusted EBITDA and net income figures from 2012-2016.
The document summarizes an equity valuation of The Walt Disney Company conducted by Sonali Jain. The valuation uses a discounted cash flow model and multiples valuation.
The DCF model involves forecasting Disney's earnings over 5 years, estimating cash flows by calculating items like depreciation, capital expenditures and working capital requirements. It also estimates Disney's discount rate and calculates the terminal value.
A multiples valuation is also conducted using metrics like P/E, EV/EBITDA compared to competitors. Sensitivity analysis is performed on the discount rate and growth rate.
The conclusion notes limitations of the DCF model and importance of understanding the company's fundamentals over precision of methods used.
FAG Bearings reported strong performance in 3QCY2010 with net sales growing 31.5% YoY to Rs. 272.4 crore, in line with estimates. EBITDA margin expanded 381bps YoY to 17.7% due to lower raw material costs. Net profit increased 90.1% YoY to Rs. 31.4 crore on robust sales growth and improved operating performance. The brokerage maintains its estimates and recommends buying the stock with a target price of Rs. 1,035, valuing it at 12x CY2012 EPS.
Localiza Rent a Car S.A. is a car rental company founded in 1973 in Brazil. It has grown to become the largest car rental company in Brazil through acquisitions and expanding into new business divisions such as fleet rental and used car sales. Localiza has a large integrated business platform with competitive advantages in raising capital, purchasing vehicles, nationwide presence, and innovation. Financial results are strongest in the car rental and fleet rental divisions due to their higher return on invested capital compared to cost of debt. The company has opportunities to continue growing through increasing domestic air traffic and infrastructure investments in Brazil.
Barco's segment analysis shows that its Healthcare segment generates the highest returns with the least capital intensity, while Entertainment consumes over 50% of invested capital and generates returns close to the cost of capital. Economic profit improved in 2016 after declining since 2012, driving share price gains. However, there remains a large gap between Barco's implied stock price returns of low single digits and its recent economic returns. Fractal Value Advisors can help Barco management better communicate its performance and strategy using economic measures like CFROI to increase shareholder value.
1) The CFO provided information on the firm's capital structure, bond yields, stock prices, tax rates, and growth expectations to estimate the WACC.
2) The costs of debt, preferred stock, and retained earnings were calculated using the bond yield, dividend yield, CAPM, and DCF approaches.
3) The WACC was estimated to be 7.58% using a 40% weight on debt at 3.6%, 10% weight on preferred stock at 7.4%, and 50% weight on retained earnings at 10.08%.
1. Fordham Securities
This report is published for educational purposes only by
Tim (Ngoc Do) – ndo2@fordham.edu
Date: April, 2016
Industry: Rental And Leasing
LET’S GET THE ENGINES STARTED…
We issue a Hold recommendation on Hertz with a one-year target price
of $13.86 using the Discounted Free Cash Flow Model. This offers a
40% increase from its closing price of $9.85 on Apr 6th
, 2016. Even
though HTZ offers great return, we issue a Hold because our target price
is lower than concencus and the stock has high risk.
Year Revenue EBITDA1
EBIT PAT EPS2
PE
2015A 10,535 1,415 1,063 504 1.11 16.2x
2016P 10,679 1,635 1,284 460 1.05 9.4x
2017P 10,978 1,745 1,457 543 1.23 8.0x
2018P 11,274 1,866 1,591 624 1.41 7.0x
2019P 11,580 1,939 1,665 669 1.50 6.6x
2020P 11,895 2,015 1,741 715 1.60 6.2x
Major growth drivers include:
• Low oil price environment fosters the Airline industry, which
directly and positively impacts Car rentals, Hertz’s main business
segment
• The promising spin off of Hertz’s equipment rental business
Major risks include:
• Accounting standard risk – recent delay company filings
• High price pressure and lower revenue per vehicle
• Evolving competitive landscape with Car-Sharing Rentals (Zipcar)
Company Overview
Hertz is one of the premier brands in the rental car industry with
approximately 11,555 locations in 145 countries. Hertz has been in the car-
rental business since 1918 and in the equipment-rental business since 1965.
Hertz Share Price Data
1
Using Corporate Adjusted EBITDA (does not include depreciation and amortization from rental fleet), and Corporate Net Debt (does not include fleet debt)
2
Recent company guidance: Corporate Adjusted EBITDA $1.6-$1.7B, EPS 0.95-1.10, and effective tax rate of 37%
Ticker: NYSE: HTZ Recommendation: Neutral
Price: 9.85 (April 6, 2016) Target Price:$13.86
Time Horizon: One Year
HERTZ
GLOBAL
HOLDINGS
(‘HERTZ’)
Market Profile
Closing Price (USD) 9.8
52-Week Range 6.9-22.6
Share Outstandings (M) 424.4
Market Cap (M) 4,000
P/E 16.0
EV/EBITDA 4.9x
Source: Yahoo Finance, Thompson One, Team
Estimates
Analyst Forecast
Target
Mean 16.4
Median 15.0
High 32.0
Low 12.0
Std. Dev 6.17
Total 7
Source: Thompson One
Analyst Comparison
# of
Brokers
Strong Buy 2
Buy 5
Hold 2
Underperform 0
Sell 0
Total 9
Source: Thompson One
Source: Team Estimates
Apr - 17
Target
Price:
$ 13.86
2. Fordham Securities April, 2016
2
Investment Thesis
Increasing revenue from low oil price
Hertz generates a large portion of its businesses from airport traffic due to extensive on-
airport facilities. 29% and 10% of company’s revenues come from U.S. on-airport
business for leisure and commercial purposes, respectively. Before the Dollar Thrifty
acquisition, Hertz had a 25% market share in the U.S. airport market, behind
Enterprise and Avis Budget Group, with a 34% and 26% market share respectively.
After the acquisition, Hertz became the largest car rental business with the the highest
coverage at major U.S. airports and a market share at 37%3
.
Lower Jet Fuel price has created a positive environment for the Airlines Industry. After
reaching its peak at $3.3 per gallon in 2011, Jet Fuel price has been gradually
decreasing over the past few years, and currently sits at $1.1 per gallon4
. Lower Jet Fuel
price allows airline companies to offer more affordable air transportation to customers.
The Passenger Load factor, which measures capacity utilization of U.S Airlines
Company, implies a potential increase in seat fillings from roughly 81% in 2014 to
83.6% in 2017. There is a high degree of positive correlation between the revenues of
Hertz’s and those of the Airlines Industry, as identified by a 0.9 correlation. Estimated
growth rate of the Airlines Industry’s sales over the next three years will be around 5%,
and we expect Hertz’s revenues to grow at a CAGR of 2.5% in the next 5 years.
Jet Fuel cost consists 31.5% of operating costs of the Airlines Industry. Lower Jet Fuel
price will result in margin expansion and create competitive price environment in the
industry. Airline ticket prices have been gradually decreasing since 2015 and we expect
prices to stay at the same level in 2016.
The promising spin off of Hertz’s equipment rental business (HERC)
Realizing the growth potential of the equipment rental business, Hertz’s management
board decided to spin off the business in order to create a stronger growth profile and a
more competitive position for each business. The company also announced the intention
to maintain a target net leverage ratio of 3.5x to 4.0x5
. Hertz’s equipment rental
business revenue has an average growth rate of 12% over the last three years. The
business is also diversifying its revenue into oil and gas exploration and extraction.
Recent OPEC meetings gave no decision on restricting the amount of oil production;as
a result, we expect a 5% sales growth for Hertz’s equipment rental business in 2016.
Using the results from our DCF model, we create a spin off model splitting the
company into its car rental and equipment rental businesses. We estimate an
EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.0x for the car rental business and 10.0x for the equipment
rental business based on historical comparables. Using 2016 EBITDA multiple method
with a net corporate debt 3.5x for car rental business and 4.0x for equipment rental
business, we value Hertz’s car rental business at $13.09 per share and equipment rental
business at $3.43 per share. Details of the model can be found in the appendix.
3
Data taken from Autorentalnews research and statistic
4
IndexMundi and FactSet
5
Net leverage ratio is defined as Net Corporate Debt / Corporate EBITDA. Company guidance: http://ir.hertz.com/2015-07-16-Hertz-Completes-Financial-
Restatement-Provides-2015-Business-Outlook
Jet Fuel Cost
Source: IndexMundi
Airlines EPS Growth YoY
Source: FactSet, Team estimates
US Airlines Load Factor and
Passenger yield
Source: FactSet, Team Estimate
U.S Airport Market Share
Source: Company data, Auto Rental
Industry
3. Fordham Securities April, 2016
3
Valuation
We collect data from SEC filings, press release, and investment notes. Based on recent guidance on April 11th
,
Corporate Adjusted EBITDA is roughly $1.6-$1.7B, EPS is roughly $0.95-$1.10 with effective tax rate of
37%6
; these figures are in line with our estimates. We expects U.S. car rental revenue to stay flat with US Car
Rental on Airport growing at 2.5% and Hertz equipment rental growing at 5% in 2016. We value the company
using a DCF model together with comparables multiple. The mean EV/EBITDA multiple for the peer group of
the company was 6.8x while the median EV/EBITDA multiple was 7x. On this basis, we assign Hertz an
EV/EBITDA multiple of 7x, which translates to a target share price of $13.86.
1. WACC7
: Our WACC calculation of 8.6% was calculated with the following inputs.
Cost of Equity: 14.9% Cost of Debt: 4.5%
Risk Free Rate: 1.7% (10 year yield) Tax Rate: 37%
Expected Market Return:7.00% Post Tax Cost of Debt: 2.8%
Beta: 2.5
WACC: 8.6%
2. Our DCF with perpetuity growth method analysis derives a price target of $9.75. We use a growth rate of
2% to determine this price target.
6
http://ir.hertz.com/2016-04-11-Hertz-Global-Holdings-Inc-Provides-Business-Update
7
Not including fleet debt and cost of fleet debt
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis for HERTZ
Dollars in millions, except per share
Historical Year Ending December 28, Projected Year Ending December 28,
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Sales $10,775.0 $11,046.0 $10,535.0 $10,679.3 $10,977.5 $11,274.0 $11,579.7 $11,895.0
EBITDA 2,216.0 1,335.0 1,415.0 1,635.0 1,744.9 1,865.5 1,939.0 2,015.4
Less: Depreciation (188.0) (207.0) (196.0) (198.2) (193.2) (198.4) (203.8) (209.4)
Less: Amortization (151.0) (159.0) (156.0) (153.0) (95.0) (76.0) (70.0) (65.0)
EBIT 1,877.0 969.0 1,063.0 1,283.8 1,456.7 1,591.1 1,665.2 1,741.0
Less: Taxes @ 40.0% (750.8) (387.6) (425.2) (513.5) (582.7) (636.4) (666.1) (696.4)
Tax-effected EBIT 1,126.2 581.4 637.8 770.3 874.0 954.7 999.1 1,044.6
Plus: Depreciation 2,912.4 2,956.4 3,008.7 3,062.0 3,116.3
Plus: Amortization 153.0 95.0 76.0 70.0 65.0
Less: Capital expenditures (3,234.2) (3,295.0) (3,353.6) (3,413.4) (3,474.3)
Less: Additions to definite life intangibles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
+ / - Changes in working capital (48.7) (26.6) (42.0) (23.3) (24.0)
+ / - Changes in other assets and liabilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Unlevered Free Cash Flow $552.8 $603.9 $643.7 $694.4 $727.6
Unlevered Free Cash Flow Growth Rate 9.2% 6.6% 7.9% 4.8%
EBITDA Multiple Method
Weighted average cost of capital: 8.6%
Net present value of free cash flow (b) $2,506.0
Exit multiple 7.0x
Terminal value $14,107.8
Present value of the terminal value (c) 9,348.5
Enterprise Value $11,854.5
LESS: Net Debt (d) (e) (5,535.0)
Equity Value $6,319.5
Diluted shares: 456.000
Equity Value Per Share (e) $13.86
Corporate
Debt 6057.0
Cash 522.0
Minority
Interest 0.0
Preferred 0.0
5535.0
Net
Debt
4. Fordham Securities April, 2016
4
Investment Risks
Accounting standard risk: Recent accouting restatement and filling delays put a big
question on Hertz’s accounting standard. In August 2015, the company withdrew its
financial guidance and announced that it needed to review fiscal results from 2011 to
2013. In November of the same year, the company announced it generated $87 million
less in revenues than previously thought and would restate three years’ worth of
earnings8
.
Price pressure risk: Hertz expects US Car Rental revenues per available car day to
decline between 2.5 to 3.5 percent versus the same period last year due to pricing
pressure. Large fleet size give Hertz a better advantage in scale but lower flexibility when
cyclical seasonal intensify.
Car-Sharing Rentals Grow (Zipcar): Car sharing, a new model for people to rent cars
more conveniently, has been expanding its footprint. Roughly 18 percent of Americans
have used a car-sharing service. Substitute services including Uber and Lyft also pose a
high threat to the car-rental business.
Residual risk: The percentage of “program cars” that manufacturers agreed to repurchase
at a specified price or guarantee a setdepreciation rate has decreased from 48% to 30% in
Hertz car rental fleet. Additionally, the decline in the value of the non-program cars
causes severe residual risk for the company. Compared to Avis’s 37% program cars,
Hertz faces bigger challenges.
Fuel price fluctuation: Crude oil price is down from $100 in 2014 to the present price at
$40 (Apr 6th
2016), which allows Hertz to greatly reduce its fuel expense. However,
major oil exporting countries are giving uncertainty signal whether they are going to
further restrict oil production.
8
http://www.businessinsider.com/hertz-earnings-delayed-may-12-2015-5
5. Fordham Securities April, 2016
5
Appendix
Appendix 1: Income Statement and Free Cash Flow Buildup
Appendix 2: Spin off Model
Appendix 3: Sensitivity Analysis
Appendix 4: Deal Comps
Appendix 5: Car Rental Survey Results
Appendix 6: Other Information
6. Fordham Securities April, 2016
6
Appendix 1: Income Statement and DCF Model
Income
Statement
Fiscal
Years
Ending
December
31,
($
in
millions) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Revenues:
Worldwide
car
rental 8,709.00
8,907.00
8,434.00
8,487.01
8,689.73
8,886.32
9,087.51
9,293.44
Worldwide
equipment
rental 1,539.00
1,571.00
1,518.00
1,593.90
1,673.60
1,757.27
1,845.14
1,937.40
All
other
operations 527.00
568.00
583.00
598.40
614.20
630.42
647.07
664.16
Total
revenues 10,775.00
11,046.00
10,535.00
10,679.31
10,977.53
11,274.01
11,579.72
11,894.99
Expenses:
Direct
operating 5,498.00
6,139.00
5,700.00
5,732.41
5,813.59
5,903.09
6,060.52
6,224.06
Depreciation
of
revenue
earning
equipment,
net 2,533.00
3,034.00
2,762.00
2,714.22
2,763.19
2,810.26
2,858.17
2,906.92
Depreciation
of
PPE
188.00
207.00
196.00
198.21
193.20
198.42
203.80
209.35
Amortization 151.00
159.00
156.00
153.00
95.00
76.00
70.00
65.00
Selling,
general
and
administrative 867.00
904.00
1,010.00
948.91
944.07
969.56
995.86
1,022.97
Interest
expense,
net 707.00
648.00
622.00
635.21
635.21
635.21
635.21
635.21
Interest
income -‐
-‐
-‐
(2.00)
(2.73)
(3.55)
(4.48)
(5.52)
Other
(income)
expense,
net 102.00
(15.00)
(131.00)
(80.00)
(80.00)
(80.00)
(80.00)
(80.00)
Total
expenses 9,707.00
10,710.00
9,963.00
9,948.75
10,073.32
10,234.58
10,465.27
10,703.64
Income
before
income
taxes 1,068.00
336.00
572.00
730.56
904.21
1,039.43
1,114.45
1,191.35
Provision
for
taxes
on
income (533.50)
(238.50)
(68.00)
(270.31) (361.68) (415.77) (445.78) (476.54)
Net
income 534.50
97.50
504.00
460.25
542.52
623.66
668.67
714.81
Less:
Net
income
attributable
to
noncontrolling
interest -‐
-‐
-‐
Net
income
attributable
to
The
Hertz
Corporation
and
Subsidiaries'
common
stockholder 534.50
97.50
504.00
460.25
542.52
623.66
668.67
714.81
Diluted
Share
Outstandings 463.90
454.00
456.00
439.37
441.37
443.37
445.37
447.37
Total
Share
Outstandings 445.80
459.00
423.00
425.00
427.00
429.00
431.00
433.00
EPS
(diluted) 1.15
0.21
1.11
1.05
1.23
1.41
1.50
1.60
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis for HERTZ
Dollars in millions, except per share
Historical Year Ending December 28, Projected Year Ending December 28,
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Sales $10,775.0 $11,046.0 $10,535.0 $10,679.3 $10,977.5 $11,274.0 $11,579.7 $11,895.0
EBITDA 2,216.0 1,335.0 1,415.0 1,635.0 1,744.9 1,865.5 1,939.0 2,015.4
Less: Depreciation (188.0) (207.0) (196.0) (198.2) (193.2) (198.4) (203.8) (209.4)
Less: Amortization (151.0) (159.0) (156.0) (153.0) (95.0) (76.0) (70.0) (65.0)
EBIT 1,877.0 969.0 1,063.0 1,283.8 1,456.7 1,591.1 1,665.2 1,741.0
Less: Taxes @ 40.0% (750.8) (387.6) (425.2) (513.5) (582.7) (636.4) (666.1) (696.4)
Tax-effected EBIT 1,126.2 581.4 637.8 770.3 874.0 954.7 999.1 1,044.6
Plus: Depreciation 2,912.4 2,956.4 3,008.7 3,062.0 3,116.3
Plus: Amortization 153.0 95.0 76.0 70.0 65.0
Less: Capital expenditures (3,234.2) (3,295.0) (3,353.6) (3,413.4) (3,474.3)
Less: Additions to definite life intangibles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
+ / - Changes in working capital (48.7) (26.6) (42.0) (23.3) (24.0)
+ / - Changes in other assets and liabilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Unlevered Free Cash Flow $552.8 $603.9 $643.7 $694.4 $727.6
Unlevered Free Cash Flow Growth Rate 9.2% 6.6% 7.9% 4.8%
Perpetuity Growth Method EBITDA Multiple Method
Weighted average cost of capital: 8.6% Weighted average cost of capital: 8.6%
Net present value of free cash flow (b) $2,506.0 Net present value of free cash flow (b) $2,506.0
Growth rate of FCF after 2020 2.0% Exit multiple 7.0x
Terminal value $11,281.9 Terminal value $14,107.8
Present value of the terminal value (c) 7,475.9 Present value of the terminal value (c) 9,348.5
Enterprise Value $9,981.9 Enterprise Value $11,854.5
LESS: Net Debt (d) (e) (5,535.0) LESS: Net Debt (d) (e) (5,535.0)
Equity Value $4,446.9 Equity Value $6,319.5
Diluted shares: 456.000 Diluted shares: 456.000
Equity Value Per Share (f) $9.75 Equity Value Per Share (e) $13.86
9. Fordham Securities April, 2016
9
Appendix 4: Deal Comps for Car Rental Industry
Current Price 25.00
1 Day Premium Acquirer Date Estimate Price Over(Under)
Valued
58.72% United Rentals Inc 12/16/2011 45.00 80.00%
8.02% Hertz Global Holdings Inc 8/26/2012 12.88 -48.47%
59.90% Avis Budget Group Inc 6/14/2011 17.92 -28.34%
48.67% Avis Budget Group Inc 1/2/2013 88.84 255.37%
NA United Rentals 6/16/1998 19.61 -21.56%
32.15% Caterpillar Inc 11/15/2010 52.22 108.88%
0.41 39.41 57.65%
Source: Factset, team estimate
Industry
M&A
EV/Sales EV/EBITDA EV/IBD EV/NI P/E 1
Day
Premium Acquirer
Date
RSC
Holding
Inc 3.30x 9.30x 2.10x (179.60x) (25.42x) 58.72% United
Rentals
Inc 12/16/2011
Dollar
Thrifty
Automotive
Group
Inc 2.40x 5.50x 2.40x 19.60x 12.87x 8.02% Hertz
Global
Holdings
Inc 8/26/2012
Avis
Europe
Plc 0.70x 8.80x 1.50x 43.60x 24.48x 59.90% Avis
Budget
Group
Inc 6/14/2011
Zipcar
Inc 2.10x 11.90x 4.60x 39.50x 33.11x 48.67% Avis
Budget
Group
Inc 1/2/2013
US
Rentals
2.60x 5.90x 3.20x 15.00x 19.43x NA United
Rentals 6/16/1998
Bucyrus
International
Inc
2.80x 16.00x 5.70x 32.00x 27.96x 32.15% Caterpillar
Inc 11/15/2010
Average 2.32x 9.57x 3.25x (4.98x) 15.40x 0.41
Deal
Comps
for
Hertz
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
US Citizen Monthly Traveling
10. Fordham Securities April, 2016
10
Appendix 5: Car Rental Survey Results
The results of our survey undoubtedly support our ‘buy’ recommendation. Consumers have certain expectations
when participating in a rental transaction. They are not overwhelmingly emotional with regards to any brand, but
gravitate towards what they know and trust.
Three major brands dominate the market, according to our survey, as consumers are weary of lesser popular
companies. Only 13% did business with companies other than Hertz, Avis or Enterprise. In addition, Hertz has
received an impressive 40% of the market share. This is promising.
Purpose
Hertz has affiliated its company most commonly with travel. 68% of those surveyed have rented a car from Hertz
via an Airport facility. Hertz intends on growing their presence at airports, which given this statistic, will improve
their business.
Of those surveyed who have used Hertz, most have done so for Leisurely purposes. They are vacationing and are
in need of private transportation. This supports Hertz’s objective of obtaining business from vacationers. Coupled
with their intentions of increasing their airport presence, we are very optimistic.
Hertz, 38.46%
Avis, 27.69%
Enterprise,
26.15%
Other, 13.85%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
Business Leisure Local Commute Other
Rental Care Purpose
11. Fordham Securities April, 2016
11
Customer Satisfaction
Our survey indicated that most consumers are not loyal to a particular brand – they want a reliable and safe
service that does not interrupt precious vacation time. Consumers do not react very emotionally (unless negative)
in favor of a certain brand.
It is no surprise that only 12% of those surveyed consider Hertz’s service to be ‘Excellent’. It is difficult to
quantify a service as excellent when it is as unexciting as renting a car. The heart of the matter lies in those who
are satisfied. According to those surveyed 67% were satisfied – a notable figure when considering how unpleasant
overall travel experiences can be. We are impressed by their ability to consistently deliver a familiar product to
satisfied consumers.
Excellent
12%
Satisfactory
67%
Poor
4%
Other
17%
Hertz Customer Satisfaction
12. Fordham Securities April, 2016
12
Appendix 6: Other Information & Data
Balance
Sheet
Fiscal
Years
Ending
December
31,
($
in
millions) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Assets
Cash
and
cash
equivalents 411.00
490.00
486.00
763.17
1,069.97
1,417.12
1,815.55
2,247.76
Restricted
cash
and
cash
equivalents 861.00
571.00
349.00
349.00
349.00
349.00
349.00
349.00
Receivables,
net
of
allowance
of
$25,
$62
and
$67
respectively 1,397.00
1,597.00
2,074.00
2,102.41
2,161.12
2,219.49
2,279.67
2,341.74
Inventories,
at
lower
of
cost
or
market 87.00
67.00
51.00
73.10
75.06
76.46
78.61
80.82
Prepaid
expenses
and
other
assets 715.00
917.00
846.00
857.59
881.54
905.35
929.89
955.21
Revenue
earning
equipment,
at
cost:
Cars
and
Equipment 17,991.00
18,235.00
16,967.00
Less
accumulated
depreciation (3,800.00)
(4,582.00)
(3,839.00)
Total
revenue
earning
equipment 14,191.00
13,653.00
13,128.00
13,402.84
13,682.64
13,967.20
14,256.62
14,550.97
Property
and
equipment,
at
cost:
Land,
buildings
and
leasehold
improvements 2,249.00
2,416.00
2,422.00
Less
accumulated
depreciation (964.00)
(1,094.00)
(1,174.00)
Total
property
and
equipment 1,285.00
1,322.00
1,248.00
1,294.93
1,353.70
1,414.06
1,476.06
1,539.75
Other
intangible
assets 4,827.00
4,870.00
4,804.00
4,651.00
4,556.00
4,480.00
4,410.00
4,345.00
Amortization
of
Inangibles (703.00)
(861.00)
(982.00)
(982.00)
(982.00)
(982.00)
(982.00)
(982.00)
Goodwill 1,352.00
1,359.00
1,354.00
1,354.00
1,354.00
1,354.00
1,354.00
1,354.00
Total
assets 24,423.00
23,985.00
23,358.00
23,866.04
24,501.03
25,200.69
25,967.40
26,782.25
LIABILITIES
AND
EQUITY
Accounts
payable 1,022.00
1,008.00
875.00
880.43
904.02
920.92
946.78
973.45
Accrued
liabilities 1,171.00
1,148.00
1,106.00
1,151.40
1,182.25
1,204.35
1,238.17
1,273.05
Accrued
taxes 146.00
134.00
172.00
134.53
138.13
140.72
144.67
148.74
Debt 16,309.00
15,993.00
15,907.00
15,907.00
15,907.00
15,907.00
15,907.00
15,907.00
Public
liability
and
property
damage 351.00
385.00
402.00
402.00
402.00
402.00
402.00
402.00
Deferred
taxes
on
income 2,857.00
2,853.00
2,877.00
2,877.00
2,877.00
2,877.00
2,877.00
2,877.00
Total
liabilities 21,856.00
21,521.00
21,339.00
21,352.37
21,410.41
21,451.99
21,515.62
21,581.24
Commitments
and
contingencies -‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Equity:
The
Hertz
Corporation
and
Subsidiaries
stockholder's
equity
Common
Stock,
$0.01
par
value,
2,000.0
million
shares
authorized,
449.7
million
and
421.5
million
shares
issued
and
445.8
million
and
421.5
million
outstanding4.00
5.00
4.00
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Additional
paid-‐in
capital 3,226.00
3,325.00
3,343.00
3,803.25
4,345.78
4,969.44
5,638.10
6,352.92
Accumulated
deficit (582.00)
(664.00)
(391.00)
(527.50)
(459.25)
(493.38)
(476.31)
(484.84)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss 6.00
(115.00)
(245.00)
(245.00)
(245.00)
(245.00)
(245.00)
(245.00)
2,654.00
2,551.00
2,711.00
3,030.75
3,641.53
4,231.06
4,916.79
5,623.07
Treasury
Stock,
at
cost,
3.9
million
shares
and
0
shares (87.00)
(87.00)
(692.00)
Total
The
Hertz
Corporation
and
Subsidiaries
stockholder's
equity 2,567.00
2,464.00
2,019.00
2,513.67
3,090.62
3,748.70
4,451.78
5,201.02
Total
liabilities
and
equity 24,423.00
23,985.00
23,358.00
23,866.04
24,501.03
25,200.69
25,967.40
26,782.25
13. Fordham Securities April, 2016
13
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF
CASH
FLOWS
Fiscal
Years
Ending
December
31,
($
in
millions) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Operating
Activities
Net
income 302.00
(82.00)
273.00
460.25
542.52
623.66
668.67
714.81
Adjustments
to
reconcile
net
income
to
net
cash
provided
by
operating
activities:
Depreciation
of
revenue
earning
equipment 2,452.00
2,954.00
2,690.00
2,714.22
2,763.19
2,810.26
2,858.17
2,906.92
Depreciation
of
PPE
188.00
207.00
196.00
198.21
193.20
198.42
203.80
209.35
Amortization 151.00
159.00
156.00
153.00
95.00
76.00
70.00
65.00
Amortization
and
write-‐off
of
deferred
financing
costs 56.00
57.00
60.00
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Stock-‐based
compensation
charges 35.00
11.00
17.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
Deferred
taxes
on
income 227.00
6.00
3.00
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Other 156.00
80.00
(69.00)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Income
statement
adjustments 3,567.00
3,392.00
3,326.00
3,537.68
3,605.91
3,720.35
3,812.64
3,908.08
Receivables (53.00)
(90.00)
(58.00)
(28.41)
(58.71)
(58.37)
(60.18)
(62.07)
Inventories,
prepaid
expenses
and
other
assets (29.00)
(64.00)
(22.00)
(33.69)
(25.91)
(25.21)
(26.70)
(27.53)
Accounts
payable 54.00
23.00
(16.00)
5.43
23.59
16.90
25.86
26.67
Accrued
liabilities 29.00
139.00
43.00
45.40
30.85
22.10
33.82
34.88
Accrued
taxes 26.00
(4.00)
23.00
(37.47)
3.60
2.58
3.95
4.07
Public
liability
and
property
damage (1.00)
56.00
36.00
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Cash
flow
from
operating
activities 3,593.00
3,452.00
3,332.00
3,488.95
3,579.34
3,678.34
3,789.39
3,884.10
Investing
Activities
Restricted
cash
and
cash
equivalents (315.00)
283.00
215.00
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Revenue
earning
equipment
(10,289.00)
(11,289.00)
(12,658.00)
(11,106.48)
(11,306.85)
(11,499.49)
(11,695.52)
(11,894.99)
Property
and
equipment
(327.00)
(374.00)
(327.00)
(341.74)
(351.28)
(360.77)
(370.55)
(380.64)
Other
investing
activities 7,081.00
8,197.00
10,005.00
8,214.03
8,363.17
8,506.65
8,652.68
8,801.32
Cash
flow
from
investing
activities (3,850.00)
(3,183.00)
(2,765.00)
(3,234.19)
(3,294.96)
(3,353.61)
(3,413.39)
(3,474.31)
Net
Cash
available: (257.00)
269.00
567.00
254.75
284.38
324.73
376.00
409.79
Borrowing
Needed 257.00
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Financing
Activities
Issuance/Repayment of Revolver (514.00)
683.00
(290.00)
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Issuance
of
Debt,
Net 2,275.00
400.00
1,676.00
1,939.00 5,597.00 1,226.00 3,712.00 1,774.00
Repayment
of
Longterm
Debt (1,045.00)
(1,183.00)
(1,293.00)
(1,939.00) (5,597.00) (1,226.00) (3,712.00) (1,774.00)
Repurchase
of
Equity (555.00)
-‐
(605.00)
- - - - -
Dividends - - - - -
Options
Proceeds 22.42 22.42 22.42 22.42 22.42
Others (34.00)
(59.00)
(28.00)
Cash
flow
from
financing
activities 127.00
(159.00)
(540.00)
22.42
22.42
22.42
22.42
22.42
Change
in
cash (130.00)
110.00
27.00
277.17
306.80
347.15
398.42
432.21
Beginning
cash
balance 835.00
1,112.17
1,418.97
1,766.12
2,164.55
Ending
cash
balance 1,112.17
1,418.97
1,766.12
2,164.55
2,596.76
Cost Current
Value Weight
Ke 14.92% 4,180
0.39
5.84%
10
Year
US
Bond
Yield Rfr 1.72%
Expected
Market
Return Rm 7.00% 5.28%
Calculated Beta 2.50
RM-‐RF 5.28%
B(RM-‐RF) 13.2%
Kd 4.50% 6,500.00 0.61
2.74%
WACC 8.6%
Tax
rate 37%
CAPM
14. Fordham Securities April, 2016
14
Disclosures:
Ownership and material conflicts of interest:
The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report [holds/does not hold] a financial interest in the securities of this company.
The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report [knows/does not know] of the existence of any conflicts of interest that might bias the content or
publication of this report. [The conflict of interest is…]
Receipt of compensation:
Compensation of the author(s) of this report is NIL
Market making:
The author(s) does [not] act as a market maker in the subject company’s securities.
Ratings guide:
Banks rate companies as either a BUY, HOLD or SELL. A BUY rating is given when the security is expected to deliver absolute returns of 15% or greater
over the next twelve month period, and recommends that investors take a position above the security’s weight in the S&P 500, or any other relevant index.
A SELL rating is given when the security is expected to deliver negative returns over the next twelve months, while a HOLD rating implies flat returns over
the next twelve months.
Investment Research Challenge and Global Investment Research Challenge Acknowledgement:
Fordham Univestity Investment Research Challenge as part of is based on the Investment Research Challenge originally developed by Fordham University.
Disclaimer:
The information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources generally available to the public and believed by the author(s) to be reliable, but
the author(s) does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy or completeness. The information is not intended to be
used as the basis of any investment decisions by any person or entity. This information does not constitute investment advice, nor is it an offer or a
solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security. This report should not be considered to be a recommendation by any individual affiliated with Fordham
University Challenge with regard to this company’s stock.