The document discusses proposed legislation regarding regulation of over-the-counter derivatives. It notes that the legislation would exempt derivatives used for hedge accounting from regulation, but questions whether this focus on hedge accounting is warranted. Hedge accounting is difficult for many end-users to comply with and does not necessarily reduce risks more than other derivatives strategies. The legislation risks over-regulating end-users based on an oversimplified view of derivatives use.
Ba mgmt statement_of_financial_condition_2020ArslanIshaq5
Bright Way Asset (BA Mgmt) is a Swiss corporation located in Zug, Switzerland. You can here easily find our yearly statements of financial condition & Reports.
FlatStone Energy Partners Ltd. Presentation 2015 of the LatAm Energy LP Fund, Barbados, West Indies. FEP business plan focuses on the acquisition and development of Energy Assets : Oil and Gas (“O&G”), Infrastructure (“IFA”) and Renewable (“RE”) across Latin America (“LatAm”).
A Systematic Approach to Optimizing CollateralCognizant
With high-quality collateral all set to witness increased demand, financial services firm can achieve sizeable savings and competitive edge by rewiring their internal operations.
In the last few years, the financial markets have undergone dramatic change. While some of this is down to natural evolution, much of the change can be directly attributed to new rules introduced in the wake of the 2007 crisis. Regulators, legislators and central bank governors have been determined to avert another bubble bursting or an unexpected event that could threaten markets. Lawmakers have targeted key financial practices for reform, radically altering the expectations and behavior of industry participants. The combination of the Dodd-Frank Act, European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), MiFID ll and Basel lll signify the biggest regulatory change in decades. These reforms have resulted in major change to how financial products are traded, settled, collateralized and reported, resulting in deep and ongoing structural changes to the markets.
There is no doubt that these new rules are directly impacting buy-side firms — be they asset managers, hedge funds, insurance companies or pension funds. But while the changes have certainly brought challenges, they have also brought opportunities. Firms that can proactively evaluate structural and operational dislocations in the marketplace and tailor business models to leverage the opportunities while addressing the challenges will be in the best position to stand apart from their competitors. Revised business models call for revisions to supporting processes and systems. Buy-side firms should look to re-architect their processes and technology infrastructure, with a goal to strengthen risk control and oversight, enhance transparency and improve efficiency of front-to-back office control functions.
The credit crisis, and the regulatory response it spawned have fundamentally reshaped financial markets for buy-side firms. But while the changes have brought about challenges, they have also ushered in opportunities. The key to success will be the speed with which firms are able to understand the changing marketplace and adapt their business models to align with the changes.
Glen Birnbaum, CPA presents to local Peoria IMEC group on the business valuation process. The target audience was to manufacturing clients. Heinold Banwart, Ltd.
Ba mgmt statement_of_financial_condition_2020ArslanIshaq5
Bright Way Asset (BA Mgmt) is a Swiss corporation located in Zug, Switzerland. You can here easily find our yearly statements of financial condition & Reports.
FlatStone Energy Partners Ltd. Presentation 2015 of the LatAm Energy LP Fund, Barbados, West Indies. FEP business plan focuses on the acquisition and development of Energy Assets : Oil and Gas (“O&G”), Infrastructure (“IFA”) and Renewable (“RE”) across Latin America (“LatAm”).
A Systematic Approach to Optimizing CollateralCognizant
With high-quality collateral all set to witness increased demand, financial services firm can achieve sizeable savings and competitive edge by rewiring their internal operations.
In the last few years, the financial markets have undergone dramatic change. While some of this is down to natural evolution, much of the change can be directly attributed to new rules introduced in the wake of the 2007 crisis. Regulators, legislators and central bank governors have been determined to avert another bubble bursting or an unexpected event that could threaten markets. Lawmakers have targeted key financial practices for reform, radically altering the expectations and behavior of industry participants. The combination of the Dodd-Frank Act, European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), MiFID ll and Basel lll signify the biggest regulatory change in decades. These reforms have resulted in major change to how financial products are traded, settled, collateralized and reported, resulting in deep and ongoing structural changes to the markets.
There is no doubt that these new rules are directly impacting buy-side firms — be they asset managers, hedge funds, insurance companies or pension funds. But while the changes have certainly brought challenges, they have also brought opportunities. Firms that can proactively evaluate structural and operational dislocations in the marketplace and tailor business models to leverage the opportunities while addressing the challenges will be in the best position to stand apart from their competitors. Revised business models call for revisions to supporting processes and systems. Buy-side firms should look to re-architect their processes and technology infrastructure, with a goal to strengthen risk control and oversight, enhance transparency and improve efficiency of front-to-back office control functions.
The credit crisis, and the regulatory response it spawned have fundamentally reshaped financial markets for buy-side firms. But while the changes have brought about challenges, they have also ushered in opportunities. The key to success will be the speed with which firms are able to understand the changing marketplace and adapt their business models to align with the changes.
Glen Birnbaum, CPA presents to local Peoria IMEC group on the business valuation process. The target audience was to manufacturing clients. Heinold Banwart, Ltd.
The accounting guidance for instruments with characteristics of both debt and equity can be a complex area of U.S. GAAP. There are three main areas of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) that serve as a road map to accounting for instruments with characteristics of both debt and equity, ASC Topic 470, Debt, ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity and ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. A missed step early in the evaluation process could result in an incorrect accounting conclusion.
Reporting entities often have difficulty applying guidance for two types of instruments in particular, freestanding warrants and conversion options embedded in debt instruments. Understanding common accounting mistakes related to these instruments as well as the accounting guidance to which the instruments may be subject can assist with navigating through complex debt and equity transactions.
This opinion piece explores the reasons why GreySpark Partners believes that the forthcoming implementation of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book regulations means that it is imperative that banks rethink their risk infrastructure and develop a plan for compliance.
For private software deals, determining working capital can be tricky. Here, we will explain (from the seller’s perspective), the basics of the working capital adjustment; discuss some pitfalls; and takeaways.
Hedge Trackers reviews how FASB Exposure Draft on Financial Instruments - Der...HedgeTrackers
Hedge Trackers highlights how the new exposure draft, "Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: Financial Instruments (Topic 825) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)" will impact your interest rate hedge program. We are seeing many opportunities to lighten the hedge accounting load, but it doesn’t come without a price. Learn if your program will benefit or lose under the proposed changes. For more information visit www.hedgetrackers.com.
Hedge Trackers reviews how FASB Exposure Draft on Financial Instruments - Der...HedgeTrackers
Hedge Trackers highlights how the new exposure draft, "Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: Financial Instruments (Topic 825) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)" will impact your commodity hedge program. We are seeing many opportunities to lighten the hedge accounting load, but it doesn’t come without a price. Learn if your program will benefit or lose under the proposed changes. For more information visit www.hedgetrackrs.com.
The accounting guidance for instruments with characteristics of both debt and equity can be a complex area of U.S. GAAP. There are three main areas of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) that serve as a road map to accounting for instruments with characteristics of both debt and equity, ASC Topic 470, Debt, ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity and ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. A missed step early in the evaluation process could result in an incorrect accounting conclusion.
Reporting entities often have difficulty applying guidance for two types of instruments in particular, freestanding warrants and conversion options embedded in debt instruments. Understanding common accounting mistakes related to these instruments as well as the accounting guidance to which the instruments may be subject can assist with navigating through complex debt and equity transactions.
This opinion piece explores the reasons why GreySpark Partners believes that the forthcoming implementation of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book regulations means that it is imperative that banks rethink their risk infrastructure and develop a plan for compliance.
For private software deals, determining working capital can be tricky. Here, we will explain (from the seller’s perspective), the basics of the working capital adjustment; discuss some pitfalls; and takeaways.
Hedge Trackers reviews how FASB Exposure Draft on Financial Instruments - Der...HedgeTrackers
Hedge Trackers highlights how the new exposure draft, "Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: Financial Instruments (Topic 825) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)" will impact your interest rate hedge program. We are seeing many opportunities to lighten the hedge accounting load, but it doesn’t come without a price. Learn if your program will benefit or lose under the proposed changes. For more information visit www.hedgetrackers.com.
Hedge Trackers reviews how FASB Exposure Draft on Financial Instruments - Der...HedgeTrackers
Hedge Trackers highlights how the new exposure draft, "Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: Financial Instruments (Topic 825) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)" will impact your commodity hedge program. We are seeing many opportunities to lighten the hedge accounting load, but it doesn’t come without a price. Learn if your program will benefit or lose under the proposed changes. For more information visit www.hedgetrackrs.com.
The implementation of the MAR in 2010 will
provide a valuable opportunity for insurers
to assess the effectiveness of their internal
controls and the accuracy of their financial
reporting. Insurers must promptly develop a
strategy for compliance with the MAR if they
have not done so already. A set of corporate
norms for complying with the new MAR
has yet to develop, but actuaries have the
knowledge and skills to assist in many aspects
of the process and can help determine the set
of best practices moving forward.
Facing increased regulatory oversight, more banks are opting for an integrated collateral management system that facilitates collateral optimization in coordination with central clearing counterparties (CCPs).
The third quarter was all about hedging and complex financial instruments. Two accounting standards updates will simplify accounting for entities and the users of their financial statements.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released its long-awaited improvements to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging in late August. The hedging project began as a significant overhaul to hedge accounting as proposed in 2008 and 2010 Exposure Drafts. However, upon reactivating the hedging project, the FASB determined such broad based changes were not necessary; rather, several targeted improvements could achieve the objectives.
These amendments, provided in Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-12, are designed to address concerns expressed by preparers and users of financial statements regarding difficulties in applying hedge accounting as well as the clarity with which hedging activities are presented in the financial statements.
The Renaissance of Stable Value: Capital Preservation in Defined ContributionCallan
*Stable value funds are low-risk investment options in participant directed plans that mix capital preservation with return generation. They invest in high-quality, short- and intermediate-duration fixed income securities, and utilize wrap contracts to insulate individual plan participants from market value fluctuations.
*Stable value funds serve as an alternative to more volatile or risky asset classes and are a direct substitute for a money market fund. They typically offer a more attractive yield than money market funds, except during periods when short-term rates are rising rapidly.
*This paper describes how the underlying mix of securities and issuer characteristics have evolved since the financial crisis, and why Callan sees stable value as a healthy and important part of the U.S. retirement plan marketplace.
Introduction
In this paper, we seek to answer questions defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors and their participants may have about stable value funds, including mechanics, instruments, liquidity, and implementation considerations. We also look at risk and performance, address benchmarking issues, cover recent trends, and provide key takeaways for DC plan sponsors.
Stable value funds are popular with DC plans and 529 college saving investors. According to Callan’s DC Index™, 65% of DC plans offer a stable value fund, and typically 14% of total plan assets are in such funds when offered.
We believe stable value can be an effective investment option for DC plan participants seeking capital preservation.
This article analyzes a current financial reporting and accounting issue regarding diversity in
financial reporting practice. Since the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) first issued accounting
statement 157 Fair Value Measurements, entities have been required to measure investments at fair market
values. This included the requirement to categorize investments within a fair value hierarchy in preparation to
report such in the financial statements. To do this, the FASB allows companies to either categorize the
investment in the fair value hierarchy using three different input levels (Level 1, 2 and 3) or by estimating the
net asset value as a practical expedient. If the entity uses the practical expedient, the investment would be
placed within the fair value hierarchy based on whether the investment is redeemable with the investee at the
measurement date, never redeemable, or redeemable in the future. Based on this information, the investment
would be placed in either level 2 or 3 of the hierarchy. As a result, there is diversity in practice when estimating
the length of time in the near term the investment would be redeemed. This article reports the results of
evaluating how can the diversity in accounting practice related to how certain investments measured at net asset
value are categorized within the fair value hierarchy be resolved. The results of the qualitative research
conducted on the FASB proposal concluded that fourteen out of the eighteen public comment letters agreed
with FASB proposal that eliminating the requirements to classify these investments in the fair value hierarchy
would increase comparability in accounting practice among entities.
This article analyzes a current financial reporting and accounting issue regarding diversity in financial reporting practice. Since the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) first issued accounting statement 157 Fair Value Measurements, entities have been required to measure investments at fair market values. This included the requirement to categorize investments within a fair value hierarchy in preparation to report such in the financial statements. To do this, the FASB allows companies to either categorize the investment in the fair value hierarchy using three different input levels (Level 1, 2 and 3) or by estimating the net asset value as a practical expedient. If the entity uses the practical expedient, the investment would be placed within the fair value hierarchy based on whether the investment is redeemable with the investee at the measurement date, never redeemable, or redeemable in the future. Based on this information, the investment would be placed in either level 2 or 3 of the hierarchy. As a result, there is diversity in practice when estimating the length of time in the near term the investment would be redeemed. This article reports the results of evaluating how can the diversity in accounting practice related to how certain investments measured at net asset value are categorized within the fair value hierarchy be resolved. The results of the qualitative research conducted on the FASB proposal concluded that fourteen out of the eighteen public comment letters agreed with FASB proposal that eliminating the requirements to classify these investments in the fair value hierarchy would increase comparability in accounting practice among entities.
Forward-Looking Practices in Wealth ManagementCognizant
To keep up with growing regulations in wealth management sector, firms need to future-proof their operations with a robust risk-control system and transparent trading practices.
The first chapter introduces us to Corporate finance is essential .docxoreo10
The first chapter introduces us to Corporate finance is essential to all managers as it provides all the skills managers need to; Identify corporate strategies and individual projects that add value to the organization and come up with plans for acquiring the funds. The types of business forms are; sole proprietorship, corporation and partnerships. A sole proprietorship form of business possesses different advantages and disadvantages. A partnership maintains roughly similar pros and cons of a sole proprietorship. A corporation is a legal entity that is separate from its owners and managers. Advantages include a smooth transfer of ownership, limited liability, ease of raising capital. The disadvantages include; double taxation, and a high cost of set-up and report filing. The chapter then deals with Objective of the firm, which is to maximize wealth. The final topic is an in-depth look at Financial Securities, which are markets and institutions.
In the second chapter, we are introduced to financial statements, Cash flow and taxes. Financial statements include; the Income statement and the Balance sheet. An income statement is a financial statement that shows a company’s financial performance regarding revenues and expenses, over a particular period, mostly one year. A balance sheet, on the other hand, is a financial statement that states a company’s assets, liabilities and capital at a particular point in time. Under the cash flow, the chapter covers on the Statement of cash flows, indicates how various changes in balance sheet and income statement accounts affect cash and analyses financing, investing and operating activities. A free cash flow shows the cash that an organization is capable of generating after investment to either maintain or expand its database. Under taxes, Corporate and personal taxes are well explained and the scenarios under which they apply.
Chapter Three analyzes Financial Statements. This analysis is broken down into; Ratio Analysis, DuPont equation. The effects of improving ratios, the limitations of ratio analysis and the Qualitative factors. Ratios help in comparison of; one company over time and one company versus other companies. Ratios are used by; Stockholders to estimate future cash flows and risks, lenders to determine their creditworthiness and managers to identify areas of weaknesses and strengths. Liquidity ratios show whether a company can meet its short-term commitments using the resources it has at that particular time. Asset management ratios exemplify how well an organization utilize its assets. Debt management ratios, leverage ratios as well as profitability ratios are explained.
The DuPont equation focuses on several issues. These are; Debt Utilization, Asset utilization and the Expense Control. Consequently, Ratio analysis has various problems and limitations. These include; Distortion of ratios from seasonal factors, various operating and accounting practices can distort comparisons and also it i ...
Similar to Hedge Accounting And OTC Derivatives Legislation (20)
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemAggregage
https://www.productmanagementtoday.com/frs/26903918/understanding-user-needs-and-satisfying-them
We know we want to create products which our customers find to be valuable. Whether we label it as customer-centric or product-led depends on how long we've been doing product management. There are three challenges we face when doing this. The obvious challenge is figuring out what our users need; the non-obvious challenges are in creating a shared understanding of those needs and in sensing if what we're doing is meeting those needs.
In this webinar, we won't focus on the research methods for discovering user-needs. We will focus on synthesis of the needs we discover, communication and alignment tools, and how we operationalize addressing those needs.
Industry expert Scott Sehlhorst will:
• Introduce a taxonomy for user goals with real world examples
• Present the Onion Diagram, a tool for contextualizing task-level goals
• Illustrate how customer journey maps capture activity-level and task-level goals
• Demonstrate the best approach to selection and prioritization of user-goals to address
• Highlight the crucial benchmarks, observable changes, in ensuring fulfillment of customer needs
LA HUG - Video Testimonials with Chynna Morgan - June 2024Lital Barkan
Have you ever heard that user-generated content or video testimonials can take your brand to the next level? We will explore how you can effectively use video testimonials to leverage and boost your sales, content strategy, and increase your CRM data.🤯
We will dig deeper into:
1. How to capture video testimonials that convert from your audience 🎥
2. How to leverage your testimonials to boost your sales 💲
3. How you can capture more CRM data to understand your audience better through video testimonials. 📊
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024FelixPerez547899
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
Navigating the world of forex trading can be challenging, especially for beginners. To help you make an informed decision, we have comprehensively compared the best forex brokers in India for 2024. This article, reviewed by Top Forex Brokers Review, will cover featured award winners, the best forex brokers, featured offers, the best copy trading platforms, the best forex brokers for beginners, the best MetaTrader brokers, and recently updated reviews. We will focus on FP Markets, Black Bull, EightCap, IC Markets, and Octa.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
Anny Serafina Love - Letter of Recommendation by Kellen Harkins, MS.AnnySerafinaLove
This letter, written by Kellen Harkins, Course Director at Full Sail University, commends Anny Love's exemplary performance in the Video Sharing Platforms class. It highlights her dedication, willingness to challenge herself, and exceptional skills in production, editing, and marketing across various video platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram.
Anny Serafina Love - Letter of Recommendation by Kellen Harkins, MS.
Hedge Accounting And OTC Derivatives Legislation
1. Portfolio Media, Inc. | 648 Broadway, Suite 200 | New York, NY 10012 | www.law360.com
Phone: +1 212 537 6331 | Fax: +1 212 537 6371 | customerservice@portfoliomedia.com
Hedge Accounting And OTC Derivatives Legislation
Law360, New York (September 18, 2009) -- On August 11, the Obama administration
proposed new legislation (the “legislation”), which promotes the standardization of most
over-the-counter derivatives products (“regulated derivatives”).[1] The legislation also
provides for substantial new regulation for dealers in regulated derivatives and for large
end-users[2] that hold “substantial net positions” in these instruments.
One of the striking features of the legislation is the endorsement it gives to derivatives
strategies that qualify for hedge accounting under generally accepted accounting
principles to the exclusion of all other uses of derivatives.
As discussed below, this status is neither warranted by the merits of GAAP hedge
accounting nor logically consistent with the legislation’s goal of standardizing regulated
derivatives.
More significantly, this misplaced focus could potentially subject major end-users of
regulated derivatives, such as insurance companies and pension plans, to significant
regulation under the
legislation as either a major swap participant or a major securities-based swap
participant (hereinafter, collectively referred to as a “major market participant”).[3]
Determination of Major Market Participants
The legislation directs the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission to “jointly adopt a rule” within 180 days of the
legislation’s effective date that more specifically defines terms used therein, including,
“major swap participant” and “major securities-based swap participant.”
Otherwise, the legislation suggests only two criteria that distinguish end-users that are
subject to extensive regulation from those that are not:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All Content Copyright 2003-2009, Portfolio Media, Inc.
2. 1) End-users with “substantial” net positions in regulated derivatives will be subject to
extensive regulation as major market participants;[4] and
2) Regulated derivatives used to maintain an “effective hedge under generally accepted
accounting principles, as the [CFTC and the SEC] may further jointly define by rule or
regulation,” will not be included in an organization’s net position for purposes of
determining whether its holdings in regulated derivatives is “substantial."
By heavily regulating end-users with substantial net positions in regulated derivatives
while exempting from regulation companies with similar holdings that are used to
maintain effective hedges under GAAP accounting, the legislation clearly conveys
special status to hedge accounting. However, whether this recognition is warranted is
questionable.
Derivatives are widely recognized as effective and valuable portfolio and risk
management tools. Many conservative derivatives strategies commonly used by large
end-users to more effectively and efficiently invest assets and manage risk do not
qualify for hedge accounting.
The economic benefits of derivatives strategies that qualify for hedge accounting are no
greater, and the risks are no less, than derivatives strategies that do not. Hedge
accounting was adopted to more accurately and completely report an organization’s
derivatives holdings, not to mitigate derivatives risks.
There is no question that with the substantial benefits offered by over-the-counter
derivatives, there are also substantial associated risks. One of the most significant risks
associated with over-the-counter derivatives is the substantial leverage that these
instruments provide.
In this respect it can be argued that hedge accounting requirements mitigate this risk,
since there is minimal leverage associated with derivatives strategies that qualify for
hedge accounting.
However, the same can also be argued for effective economic hedges. Furthermore,
neither an effective accounting hedge nor an effective economic hedge mitigates credit,
legal, operational and other risks associated with over-the-counter derivatives.
Hedging versus Speculation: Misconceptions about Hedge Accounting and the
Important Role of Derivatives in Portfolio and Risk Management
In focusing on hedge accounting, the drafters of the legislation may not have
appreciated the many requirements of GAAP hedge accounting or the difficulties
associated with maintaining a GAAP hedge; which is why so many end-users either can
not, or do not, seek hedge accounting for the derivatives positions they hold.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All Content Copyright 2003-2009, Portfolio Media, Inc.
3. The legislation’s focus on hedge accounting may also reflect commonly held
misconceptions about derivatives that result in simplistic characterizations of the use of
these products for either hedging or speculative purposes.
Within this framework, derivatives used for hedging purposes are grudgingly accepted;
while all other uses of derivatives are condemned as speculative and equated with
gambling. This characterization is not only simplistic, it is also inaccurate.
In practice, end-users enter into derivatives transactions to implement a broad variety of
risk and portfolio management strategies that do not fall neatly within a binary
framework.
Organizations commonly use total return swaps to quickly gain diversified exposures to
emerging markets where liquidity constraints, transaction costs and local legal and
regulatory restrictions, make it economically unfeasible to do so in the cash market.
Similarly, organizations that need to acquire a fixed income asset, with specific terms
and associated economic characteristics (e.g., term, coupon, par value) to meet specific
portfolio or risk management needs of the company, may not find that asset in the cash
market.
The cash asset either may not be available or not available at an appropriate price.
Under these circumstances, portfolio managers frequently use a credit default swap or
other derivative instrument in combination with a cash instrument, to create a “synthetic”
asset that replicates the required economic characteristics.
Fixed income portfolio managers also use interest rate swaps, caps, floors and
swaptions in a portfolio overlay strategy to express an opinion on the direction of
interest rates: extending the duration of the portfolio when rates are high and expected
to fall, and lowering duration when rates are low and expected to rise.
Also, additional income can be generated by an organization in a flat or falling market
by selling call options on assets held in the organization’s portfolio.
Some of these derivatives strategies have hedging benefits but most are generally not
considered hedges per se. However, when used prudently with proper oversight, these
strategies are no more speculative than the same investment in the cash market would
be.
If it is permissible and prudent for a company to take a position in the cash market, why
should it be considered a speculative bet to use regulated derivatives to more cost
efficiently take the same economic position?
GAAP Hedge Accounting
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All Content Copyright 2003-2009, Portfolio Media, Inc.
4. The rules for determining whether a derivatives position maintained by an organization
is an “effective hedge” under GAAP are set forth under the Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives Instruments and
Hedging Activities (“FASB 133”).
FASB 133, issued in June 1998, requires an organization to record each outstanding
derivatives transaction on its balance sheet and to report all changes in value of the
instruments through its income statement. However, the change in value of derivatives
positions that qualify for hedge accounting have no impact on earnings under FASB
133.[5]
Under FASB 133, only derivatives used to maintain an effective hedge against (1)
changes in the fair market value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments of an
organization; (2) risks associated with changes in cash flows from individual assets or a
portfolio of assets as a result of changes in interest rates or fair market values; or (3)
foreign currency exposures from net investments in foreign operations can qualify for
hedge accounting.
Hedges of subcomponents of these risks, for example, changes in the fair market value
of a bond caused by shifts in the yield curve,[6] may not qualify for hedge accounting.
In order to qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the value or cash flow of a
derivatives hedging position must also be “highly effective” in offsetting changes in the
value or cash flow of the hedged item. FASB 133 also requires companies to formally
document the hedge at inception.
Generally, this documentation must identify the hedged item and the associated
derivatives position, the nature of the risk being hedged, the objective and strategy for
mitigating the risk, and how the effectiveness of a hedge will be measured over its
projected life. The effectiveness of the hedge must also be tested and reported for each
financial report of the organization and at least every three months.[7]
To maintain a highly effective hedge, the critical economic terms of the derivatives
instrument, such as notional amount, term, and rate, must closely match the
corresponding terms of the hedged item.
Ironically, by promoting the standardization of regulated derivative contracts, the
legislation will make it more difficult for end-users to identify derivatives contracts with
terms that closely match the terms of the asset or liability they seek to hedge.
In this regard, the Legislation is at cross-purposes with itself. Regulated derivatives
contracts may be standardized, but not the risks that organizations seek to hedge.
Finally, assets, liabilities and firm commitments may be aggregated and hedged on a
portfolio basis under FASB 133. However, hedges of the fair market value of portfolios
rarely qualify for hedge accounting.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All Content Copyright 2003-2009, Portfolio Media, Inc.
5. In order for these hedges to qualify for hedge accounting, each individual hedged item
in the portfolio must share the same risk profile. As a practical matter, this is rarely
achieved.[8]
GAAP Hedge vs. Economic Hedge
Many hedging strategies do not qualify for hedge accounting under GAAP. These
derivatives strategies nonetheless act as effective economic hedges, reducing or
eliminating an organization’s exposure to specific risks and lowering its earnings
volatility.
Organizations frequently use regulated derivatives to hedge against basis and liquidity
risks and against fair market value risks associated with changes in the yield curve even
though these hedges generally do not qualify for hedge accounting.
Balance sheet hedges, which hedge an organization’s foreign currency exposure under
liabilities, which are not backed by assets in the same currency, also do not qualify for
hedge accounting.
Similarly, even though, as noted above, portfolio hedges rarely qualify for hedge
accounting, these hedges are far more cost efficient and effective than individual
hedging each asset or liability in the portfolio. The economic benefits of portfolio
hedging vastly outweigh the accounting benefits a company can achieve with individual
hedges.
Credit default risk can be separately identified and hedged under FASB 133. Although
credit default swaps are effective economic hedges of credit risk,[9] as a practical
matter, they can not qualify as effective hedges under GAAP: the day to day changes in
the market value of the credit default swap do not effectively off-set corresponding
changes in the market value of the hedged bond.
Asset liability matching, or ALM, is an important risk management process for insurance
companies and pension plans. The goal of ALM is to fine tune the duration and
convexity of a portfolio of assets (liabilities) to more closely match the duration and
convexity of the portfolio of liabilities that they back.
The duration and convexity of liabilities can also be adjusted to more closely match the
corresponding assets. Although these adjustments can be effected through purchases
or sales in the cash market, duration and convexity can be more accurately and more
cost efficiently adjusted using derivatives overlay strategies.
Unfortunately, however, derivatives held to effect these strategies do not qualify for
hedge accounting.
Equity index options; total return equity index swaps; interest rate swaps, caps and
calls; and swaptions and other derivative products commonly used by insurance
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All Content Copyright 2003-2009, Portfolio Media, Inc.
6. companies that sell various annuity products to hedge their exposures under these
products to increases or decreases in equity market values and interest rates, also do
not qualify for hedge accounting.
Conclusion
Derivatives clearly have significant potential risks and the over-the-counter derivatives
market needs to be carefully regulated to better insure these risks are adequately
mitigated. Unfortunately, the distinction accorded derivatives positions used to maintain
effective hedges under GAAP is not warranted.
Rather then promoting better risk management practices, or the more prudent use of
derivatives, this false distinction promotes the common misconception that derivatives
are used for only two purposes: hedging and speculation.
Over-the-counter derivatives can also be invaluable tools which enable organizations to
more efficiently and effectively invest assets and manage risk. Due and careful
consideration of both the benefits and the risks of over-the-counter derivatives should
be reflected in the regulation of these products.
Regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives market, which if ultimately adopted by
Congress and implemented by the CFTC and the SEC, should also provide a better and
more nuanced framework to distinguish between the prudent use of over-the-counter
derivatives products and truly “speculative” use of these instruments.
If the legislation is ultimately adopted by Congress, with its emphasis on hedge
accounting, end-users with risky derivatives strategies may go unregulated while
insurance companies, pension plans and other prudent end-users of derivatives could
be unnecessarily subjected to greater regulation.
The legislation may also expose end-users to greater cost and risk if it is no longer
feasible or possible for them to implement portfolio and risk management derivative
strategies.
--By William H. Hope II, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
Bill Hope is counsel with Sutherland in the firm's Atlanta office and a member of the
firm's corporate practice group. He is also an active member of the CFA Institute and a
CFA charterholder.
The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views
of Portfolio Media, publisher of Law360.
[1] As currently proposed, cross-currency swap transactions and foreign currency
forward transactions are not regulated by the legislation. However, in a letter to Sen.
Tom Harkin, Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, Gary
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All Content Copyright 2003-2009, Portfolio Media, Inc.
7. Gensler, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, proposed that
foreign currency derivative products be covered by the legislation.
[2] “End-users” enter into derivatives transactions for specific portfolio or risk
management objectives. In contrast, as financial intermediaries, “dealers” profit from
making a market in derivative instruments, buying and selling at bid/ask spreads.
Dealers are identified in the legislation as “swap dealers,” and defined as any person
who as part of a regular business engages, “in the business of buying and selling swaps
for such person’s own account, through a broker or otherwise.”
[3] The legislation categorizes regulated derivatives as either swaps, which the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission is primarily charged with regulating; or
security-based swaps, for which the Securities and Exchange Commission is the
responsible regulator. Under this framework, end-users with substantial net positions in
swaps are “major swap participants” and end-users with substantial net positions in
securities-based swaps are “major securities-based swap participants.”
[4] “Substantial” is not defined in the legislation.
[5] Organizations are allowed to make off-setting entries in their P&L to eliminate this
impact.
[6] If the yield curve steepens, the spread between bonds of differing maturities grows
wider. When the yield curve is flatter, this spread narrows. The market value of a bond
is partially impacted by these changes in yield spreads.
[7] Hedges that qualify for the so-called short-cut method are exempted from these
testing requirements. Unfortunately the requirements of the short-cut method are so
difficult to meet, the significant terms of the derivatives position must perfectly match the
corresponding terms of the asset or liability it hedges, this method is rarely used.
[8] It is slightly easier to qualify cash flow hedges on a portfolio basis for hedge
accouting.
[9] If an bondholder has hedged its credit exposure to the issuer with a credit default
swap when the issuer defaults, the bondholder will be entitled to reimbursement for its
losses on the bond by its credit default swap counterparty (the floating rate payer).
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All Content Copyright 2003-2009, Portfolio Media, Inc.