Report #1 Checks and Balances After reading Chapter 2 of your t.docxaudeleypearl
Report #1: Checks and Balances
After reading Chapter 2 of your text, “The Constitution,” and watching the C-Span video “Checks and Balances: Intentions of the Founders” (link to the video below, it is about an hour and a half long), write a brief report. The report should contain three separate sections that address all the points in each question. Notice the expected word count for each section (exceeding the word count will not negatively affect your grade, but please try to stay within the range).
1. Based on your reading of Chapter 2 of the text, describe the major checks and balances in the Constitution that are intended to limit the power of each of the three branches of government. Be specific in indicating how each branch checks the others. (approximately 200-250 words)
2. According to the discussion in the video, what makes some people worry that these checks and balances are not as effective as they once were in limiting power (particularly the power of the president)? What possible reforms or changes might be needed to restore the balance of power among the branches? (approximately 200-250 words)
3. List and describe two points made during the discussion on the video concerning checks and balances that you found particularly interesting, novel, or insightful. (approximately 100-150 words)
Be careful not to plagiarize. If you want to quote directly from your book or from the video, do so by using quotation marks and by indicating the page number (if available). But try to do this sparingly and simply use your own words in addressing the questions.
In your writing, use an analytical tone that is free of your personal opinions. In other words, try to answer the questions in a straightforward and objective manner.
Link to the video: CSPAN Video on Checks and Balances
Article Critique Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Articles are written to inform, misinform, influence, or misdirect, among other reasons. Sometimes they serve as nothing more than a vehicle for an author to
achieve fame, notoriety, and wealth. You should never take at face value the elements of any article you read, but you should be able to:
• Differentiate between fact and opinion
• Recognize and evaluate author bias and rhetoric
• Determine cause-and-effect relationships
• Determine accuracy and completeness of information presented
• Recognize logical fallacies and faulty reasoning
• Compare and contrast information and points of view
• Develop inferential skills
• Make judgments and draw logical conclusions
When writing an article critique, you will need to summarize, evaluate, and offer critical comment on the ideas and information that the author(s) presents in
the article.
Starting in Module Two, you are assigned two articles to read, which are located in Module Resources for that specific module. You have to select one of the two
articles and write a critique of it. In your paper, cite any and all information taken f ...
Report #1 Checks and Balances After reading Chapter 2 of your t.docxaudeleypearl
Report #1: Checks and Balances
After reading Chapter 2 of your text, “The Constitution,” and watching the C-Span video “Checks and Balances: Intentions of the Founders” (link to the video below, it is about an hour and a half long), write a brief report. The report should contain three separate sections that address all the points in each question. Notice the expected word count for each section (exceeding the word count will not negatively affect your grade, but please try to stay within the range).
1. Based on your reading of Chapter 2 of the text, describe the major checks and balances in the Constitution that are intended to limit the power of each of the three branches of government. Be specific in indicating how each branch checks the others. (approximately 200-250 words)
2. According to the discussion in the video, what makes some people worry that these checks and balances are not as effective as they once were in limiting power (particularly the power of the president)? What possible reforms or changes might be needed to restore the balance of power among the branches? (approximately 200-250 words)
3. List and describe two points made during the discussion on the video concerning checks and balances that you found particularly interesting, novel, or insightful. (approximately 100-150 words)
Be careful not to plagiarize. If you want to quote directly from your book or from the video, do so by using quotation marks and by indicating the page number (if available). But try to do this sparingly and simply use your own words in addressing the questions.
In your writing, use an analytical tone that is free of your personal opinions. In other words, try to answer the questions in a straightforward and objective manner.
Link to the video: CSPAN Video on Checks and Balances
Article Critique Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Articles are written to inform, misinform, influence, or misdirect, among other reasons. Sometimes they serve as nothing more than a vehicle for an author to
achieve fame, notoriety, and wealth. You should never take at face value the elements of any article you read, but you should be able to:
• Differentiate between fact and opinion
• Recognize and evaluate author bias and rhetoric
• Determine cause-and-effect relationships
• Determine accuracy and completeness of information presented
• Recognize logical fallacies and faulty reasoning
• Compare and contrast information and points of view
• Develop inferential skills
• Make judgments and draw logical conclusions
When writing an article critique, you will need to summarize, evaluate, and offer critical comment on the ideas and information that the author(s) presents in
the article.
Starting in Module Two, you are assigned two articles to read, which are located in Module Resources for that specific module. You have to select one of the two
articles and write a critique of it. In your paper, cite any and all information taken f ...
a day long workshop of elements of argument, building a culture of argument in the classroom, task and learning progressions and effective argument task design
History 1378 Essay #1Professor SbardellatiSpring 2022Your SusanaFurman449
History 1378 Essay #1
Professor Sbardellati
Spring 2022
Your assignment is to construct a 5-6 page essay in response to one of the following questions. This essay is worth 25% of your overall grade in this course. It is due on Blackboard by 11:59pm on Friday, March 4. Late papers will be docked 1 point (from a max of 25, meaning the penalty is 4%) for each day they are late.
Specifications and guidelines:
Your paper must be based entirely on course material from weeks 1-6. Therefore, you are expected to utilize the podcasts and course readings (Contending Voices and U.S.: A Narrative History) but forbidden from using any other sources for this exam. Papers that incorporate outside sources will automatically receive failing grades. Furthermore, you must cite your sources. When citing a podcast, if paraphrasing, a parenthetical reference to the episode number will suffice; for example: (Episode 4). If you are directly quoting a podcast, include the episode number and the time stamp when the quote begins; for example: (Episode 9, 22:50). When citing U.S.: A Narrative History, please use a parenthetical reference with lead author and page number; for example: (Davidson, 411). When citing the essays in Contending Voices, the standard author/page number will suffice; for example: (Hollitz, 87). When citing the primary documents in Contending Voices, please also include the source number; for example (Hollitz, Source 5, 108). You do not need to include a works cited page since you are utilizing only course materials for this assignment. Your paper must be double-spaced, with standard 12-point font and normal margins.
This is a formal essay assignment. It will be marked based on the strength of your argument, your analysis of course materials, and the quality of your writing. The best papers will draw from a variety of course sources, and will incorporate close analysis of at least one or two primary documents. As with any essay you would write in university, we expect to see: a strong thesis statement which communicates your core argument; a well-structured and organized body of the paper that advances your argument via analysis of course materials; and a formal conclusion that not only ties the argument together, but elaborates on its significance.
Questions (choose one):
1. The labor movements, the Populists, and the Progressives were all responding, in their own different ways, to the challenges presented by the rise of big business. Write an essay focusing on these three groups. What were the specific problems they confronted, what were the various solutions they put forward, and how successful were each of these groups in achieving their goals?
2. Assess the ways in which Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Upton Sinclair responded to the Great Depression. What assumptions and values guided each of their approaches? What were the merits and shortcomings of the solutions they each put forward? Of course n ...
Book Reference A Rulebook for Arguments Weston, A. (20.docxAASTHA76
Book Reference
A Rulebook for Arguments
Weston, A. (2009). A rulebook for arguments (41h ed.). Indianapolis, IN:
Hackett Publishing Company
A Rulebook for
Arguments
Fourth Edition
Anthony Weston
Preface
This book is a brief introduction to the art of making arguments. It sticks to the bare essentials. I have found that students and writers
often need just such a list of reminders and rules, not lengthy introduc-
tory explanations. This book is therefore organized around specific rules,
illustrated and explained soundly but above all briefly. It is not a textbook
but a rulebook.
Instructors too, I have found, often wish to assign such a rulebook, a
treatment that students can consult and understand on their own and that
therefore does not claim too much class time. Here again, it is important
to be brief- the point is to help students get on with their actual argu-
ments-but the rules must be stated with enough substance that an in-
structor can simply refer a student to Rule 6 or Rule 16 rather than give
an entire explanation each time it is needed. Brief but self-sufficient-
that is the fine line I have tried to follow.
This rulebook also can be used in a course that gives critical attention
to arguments. It will need to be supplemented with exercises and more
examples, but many texts are already available that consist largely or
wholly of such exercises and examples. Those texts, however, also need
to be supplemented- with what this rule book offers: simple rules for put-
ting good arguments together. We do not want our students to come out
of critical thinking courses knowing only how to shoot down (or just at)
selected fallacies . Critical thinking can be practiced in a far more con-
structive spirit. This book is one attempt to suggest how.
ix
J
1m
~~~==:===================~====~-----~-
X PREFACE
Note to the Fourth Edition
Logic doesn't change, but the times do. Today students are coming to
college better prepared, and high schools and even middle schools are
teaching critical thinking themselves. A rulebook of this sort, still very
introductory, can ask more and go further than it did when I first wrote it
twenty years ago.
This new edition therefore has been significantly overhauled. Three
chapters on argumentative essays have been replaced by one chapter on
extended arguments generally, one on argumentative essays proper, and
a new chapter on oral arguments. Chapter V, on causal arguments, has a
sharper and more practical focus. There is more on the use of numbers
and a new section on Web sources, while a few themes that previously
had a section of their own have been blended with others or have migrated
to the appendixes. You'll also notice that the numbering of the rules is
simplified: the rules are now numbered consecutively, from 1 to 45.
My warmest thanks once again go to so many colleagues, friends , and
students for their support and encouragement. For especia ...
Critical and Analytical ThinkingCritical thinkin.docxannettsparrow
Critical and Analytical Thinking
Critical thinkingWord ‘critical’ has positive and negative meaningsThe word ‘critical’ in academia describes your attitude when reading an article/chapterBeing critical means weighing up the arguments for and against a particular point.
*
Not just the bad parts
How to think criticallyBe persistent – consider an issue carefully more than onceLook at the evidence for a viewpoint – evaluate it – what are they trying to ‘sell’ me?What are the implications of a view point – is it realistic and rational?Knowing facts and what is right is not what academics is aboutIt is important to identify strengths, satisfactory points and weaknesses when being critical – then you must know why this is soYou should be critical when reading, writing and listening
*
Need to fully understand an argument before you can be critical – be confident
Evaluate=what is the value/effectiveness of something, inc. own opinion and supporting each point with evidence
Question the credibility
You are just assessing ideas not learning the answers
Only want informed opinions
Analytical thinkingBeing analytical mean to look deeper into what is being saidDo not take what you read as ‘given’Evaluate what is being argued – do you agree with it?To be analytical is to question what you read
*
Not just reading what is said but ‘thinking’ about it
How to think analyticallyThink about the view point in relation to the bigger picture – stand backCompare the same issue from the point of other authors – do their views differ?Should be able to see why authors have arrived at different conclusionsYou should be able to argue why you think one set of view points is preferable to anotherYou should be analytical when reading, writing and listening
*
Think about your readings together, put into context
You should be asking why a conclusion has been made – need full understanding for this
Barriers to critical and analytical thinkingBeing critical does not just mean criticiseOur reasoning skills are not objective – we are biased ourselvesReluctance to criticise expertsWanting to know what is right and wrongNot reading deeply enough around a subject – surface knowledge
*
Not always black and white there are lots of grey areas in academics
Being analytical and critical is hard work, you have to read carefully and widely
Critical and analytical readingPrepare for critical reading – skim read the introduction and conclusionFind the conclusions first to help clarify the rest of the readingWhat is the underlying argument/ view point?Question hidden agendas or assumptionsTheory can help fill in the gaps – what is theory?
- set of ideas to explain why something happens and predict outcomes in the futureArguments are often based on theory but an argument is not always a theory
Critical and analytical readingWhere is the evidence for a view point?Check references – are they presented accurately and are they credible? - evaluate that evidence –.
1 Portfolio Drexel University Critical Reasoning Ph.docxjoyjonna282
1
Portfolio
Drexel University
Critical Reasoning
Philosophy 105
Patrick Denehy
This document provides more information about the portfolio project and guidelines to complete each
content area to the best of your ability. Use the information here and contained in the syllabus to answer
initial questions you may have. And don’t forget to include citations for every piece of text you reference
or use to help you formulate your own work. You can either include a short works cited/bibliography at the
end of each content area, or one large works cited/bibliography encompassing all content areas. Any style
is fine so long as it is consistent.
Meeting
You need to schedule a 30-minute meeting with me during the term. You should bring two content areas of
your choosing with you for review. These need to be full first drafts, not merely ideas or notes. I will read
as much as time permits to provide you feedback on how to improve these pieces of writing and approach
the remaining content areas. I will also give you a sense of where you stand with your APC grade.
Fallacies
For the fallacies content area, you should find examples of fallacies committed in texts or videos.* If all
else fails, create a dialogue between different persons that represents fallacious arguments you have heard
in the past or in which you were personally involved. After providing the fallacy, you should identify the
fallacy and then explain how this text, video, or dialogue commits this fallacy.
Students usually complete this section in one of three ways. One option is to provide a number of
examples with brief explanations (roughly 5-8 fallacies). The second option discusses fewer fallacies in
more depth (roughly 2-3 fallacies). Finally, other students take up some issue of the day and locate a
number of fallacies in arguments surrounding that issue. This third option usually involves discussing
fewer fallacies in depth as well, thereby overlapping with the second option.
Morals and Markets
While some people attempt to respond to the overall claims of Sandel’s book – and this is all well and good
– I encourage everyone to focus on at least two concrete cases or scenarios he raises. This will allow you
to provide a more in-depth response or investigate a case even further. Some people also use this as an
opportunity to perform light research in order to substantiate or criticize various points in the book. Feel
free to bring in other cases that display a dilemma of norms in a market-driven culture.
* You should not simply repeat fallacies from our textbook, another logic textbook, or some website
dedicated to explaining fallacies. There would be no point to such an exercise. The purpose is to display
that you can apply the concept of a fallacy to real-world cases, not ones already identified by others.
Finally, if you are wondering why I have included thi ...
---- Please Follow the instructions ----
Essay #5
Argument Essay
Purpose:
To demonstrate our ability to write a well-supported essay; to show our ability to do accurate works cited pages; to demonstrate our ability to cite sources using MLA format.
Audience:
people who may be unfamiliar with this topic
Paper format:
typed, double-spaced using Times New Roman and 12 pt. font; 1" margins all round; original title; name and date; separate Works Cited page; correct essay formatting and indentation of paragraphs. I will provide you with the correct Works Cited page. All you will have to do is copy it.
Note:
This paper
must
be handed in by the due date.
I will not accept any late papers.
Grade Distribution:
Rough Draft: 30 points
Accurate Works Cited Page: 20 points
Essay: 500 points
Assignment:
Write a 4-5 page argumentative paper on the following topic: Who Needs Privacy? You
must
use the following articles which are in your Week 12 Module to support your thesis and claims: "Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty" by Nicolas Carr; "Web Users Get as Much as They Give" by Jim Harper; and
"Facebook
Is Using You" by Lori Andrews. You
must
have two quotes from each of the three articles related to your topic. I will not accept any other sources that the three mentioned above.
You may not use I believe, I think, or In my opinion anywhere in your essay!
Essay Specifics:
Before you begin writing your essay, it would help if you created an outline to follow. The type of outline you create will depend on whether your readers primarily agree or disagree with you. Below are two examples:
Readers Primarily Agree with You
Strengthen their convictions by organizing your argument around a series of reasons backed by supporting evidence or by refuting opposing arguments point by point.
I. Present the Issue
II. Provide a thesis statement -
a direct statement of your position
III. Present your most plausible reasons and evidence
IV. Concede or refute opposing reasons or objections to your argument
V. Conclude:
Reaffirm your position
Readers Primarily Disagree with You
Begin by emphasizing common ground, and make a concession to show that you have considered the opposing position carefully and with an open mind.
I. Present the Issue:
Reframe the issue in terms of common values
II. Concede:
Acknowledge the wisdom of an aspect of the opposing position
III. Provide a thesis statement
- a direct statement of your position, qualified as necessary
IV. Present your most plausible reasons and evidence
V. Conclude:
Reiterate shared values
Whatever organizational strategy you adopt, do not hesitate to change your outline as necessary while drafting and revising. For instance, you might find it more effective to hold back on presenting your own position until you have discussed unacceptable alternatives. or you might if find a more powerful way to order the reasons for supporting your position. Th.
Lesson 6.2 Activity: Culture and Collective Learning DebateBig History Project
Does culture count as collective learning? Debate this topic with your classmates and decide if cultural changes occur as a direct result of our ability to learn collectively.
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
FOR EACH SET OF RESPONSES I HAVE THE REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS.. pleshantayjewison
FOR EACH SET OF RESPONSES I HAVE THE REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS.. please be sure there are 8 peer responses.. each set has their own instructions
Guided Response:
Respond to at least two of your peers. In responses, provide feedback on how peers’ key skills and qualifications will help get the job to which they are applying. Additionally, provide at least one suggestion on how your peers might emphasize their relevant skills to ensure that they are called in for an interview.
BRANDI’S POST:
Program of study
Bachelor of Arts Degree in Early Childhood Education
The position for which you are applying
Elementary School Teacher
How your field of study has prepared you for this position
My field of study has prepared me to be a teacher by teaching me the necessary skills for educating children. Through the courses that I have taken through this program of study, I have acquired the skills for curriculum planning, inclusion, and collaboration with parents and staff members
A connection you made while volunteering that does not really fit on your resume but will work in your Cover Letter
I volunteered in a second-grade classroom in 2001, while I was in high school, as a teacher’s assistant that gave me great insight into the workings of a classroom environment. This allowed me to see a teacher in action throughout an instructional day and give me the experience of working with children.
MAXINE’S POST:
Program of study:
Bachelors of Arts in Education
The position for which you are applying
Special Education School Teacher
How your field of study has prepared you for this position:
In my field yes and no. Yes because I have learned so much in correct terminology and what our children need in a teacher. No because as a teacher I now Know that I will always be learning new ways to understand our students.
A connection you made while volunteering that does not really fit on your resume but will work in your Cover Letter:
As I moved to Texas I was able to see how families are everything. I was involved in all 3 of my children's learning and afterschool activities as a cares volunteer, substitute teacher, coach or team mom. Being able to see what the teachers are all about helped me to understand as a parent what I needed to do to help my children at home. Now that I am proceeding in the teaching field I learned so many techniques and values from other teachers and coaches.
Respond to Peers:
Review your classmates’ posts, and respond to at least two of your peers by Day 7. When responding to your classmates, please provide feedback on their examples of good and poor critical thinking skills. Discuss additional ways one can think more critically. Each participation post should be a minimum of 75 words.
BRANDON’S POST:
·
Explain at least five elements of critical thinking that you found in the reading material
.
Like I stated in week 1, “Whether you realize it, or not critical thinking is involved in every decision made throug ...
a day long workshop of elements of argument, building a culture of argument in the classroom, task and learning progressions and effective argument task design
History 1378 Essay #1Professor SbardellatiSpring 2022Your SusanaFurman449
History 1378 Essay #1
Professor Sbardellati
Spring 2022
Your assignment is to construct a 5-6 page essay in response to one of the following questions. This essay is worth 25% of your overall grade in this course. It is due on Blackboard by 11:59pm on Friday, March 4. Late papers will be docked 1 point (from a max of 25, meaning the penalty is 4%) for each day they are late.
Specifications and guidelines:
Your paper must be based entirely on course material from weeks 1-6. Therefore, you are expected to utilize the podcasts and course readings (Contending Voices and U.S.: A Narrative History) but forbidden from using any other sources for this exam. Papers that incorporate outside sources will automatically receive failing grades. Furthermore, you must cite your sources. When citing a podcast, if paraphrasing, a parenthetical reference to the episode number will suffice; for example: (Episode 4). If you are directly quoting a podcast, include the episode number and the time stamp when the quote begins; for example: (Episode 9, 22:50). When citing U.S.: A Narrative History, please use a parenthetical reference with lead author and page number; for example: (Davidson, 411). When citing the essays in Contending Voices, the standard author/page number will suffice; for example: (Hollitz, 87). When citing the primary documents in Contending Voices, please also include the source number; for example (Hollitz, Source 5, 108). You do not need to include a works cited page since you are utilizing only course materials for this assignment. Your paper must be double-spaced, with standard 12-point font and normal margins.
This is a formal essay assignment. It will be marked based on the strength of your argument, your analysis of course materials, and the quality of your writing. The best papers will draw from a variety of course sources, and will incorporate close analysis of at least one or two primary documents. As with any essay you would write in university, we expect to see: a strong thesis statement which communicates your core argument; a well-structured and organized body of the paper that advances your argument via analysis of course materials; and a formal conclusion that not only ties the argument together, but elaborates on its significance.
Questions (choose one):
1. The labor movements, the Populists, and the Progressives were all responding, in their own different ways, to the challenges presented by the rise of big business. Write an essay focusing on these three groups. What were the specific problems they confronted, what were the various solutions they put forward, and how successful were each of these groups in achieving their goals?
2. Assess the ways in which Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Upton Sinclair responded to the Great Depression. What assumptions and values guided each of their approaches? What were the merits and shortcomings of the solutions they each put forward? Of course n ...
Book Reference A Rulebook for Arguments Weston, A. (20.docxAASTHA76
Book Reference
A Rulebook for Arguments
Weston, A. (2009). A rulebook for arguments (41h ed.). Indianapolis, IN:
Hackett Publishing Company
A Rulebook for
Arguments
Fourth Edition
Anthony Weston
Preface
This book is a brief introduction to the art of making arguments. It sticks to the bare essentials. I have found that students and writers
often need just such a list of reminders and rules, not lengthy introduc-
tory explanations. This book is therefore organized around specific rules,
illustrated and explained soundly but above all briefly. It is not a textbook
but a rulebook.
Instructors too, I have found, often wish to assign such a rulebook, a
treatment that students can consult and understand on their own and that
therefore does not claim too much class time. Here again, it is important
to be brief- the point is to help students get on with their actual argu-
ments-but the rules must be stated with enough substance that an in-
structor can simply refer a student to Rule 6 or Rule 16 rather than give
an entire explanation each time it is needed. Brief but self-sufficient-
that is the fine line I have tried to follow.
This rulebook also can be used in a course that gives critical attention
to arguments. It will need to be supplemented with exercises and more
examples, but many texts are already available that consist largely or
wholly of such exercises and examples. Those texts, however, also need
to be supplemented- with what this rule book offers: simple rules for put-
ting good arguments together. We do not want our students to come out
of critical thinking courses knowing only how to shoot down (or just at)
selected fallacies . Critical thinking can be practiced in a far more con-
structive spirit. This book is one attempt to suggest how.
ix
J
1m
~~~==:===================~====~-----~-
X PREFACE
Note to the Fourth Edition
Logic doesn't change, but the times do. Today students are coming to
college better prepared, and high schools and even middle schools are
teaching critical thinking themselves. A rulebook of this sort, still very
introductory, can ask more and go further than it did when I first wrote it
twenty years ago.
This new edition therefore has been significantly overhauled. Three
chapters on argumentative essays have been replaced by one chapter on
extended arguments generally, one on argumentative essays proper, and
a new chapter on oral arguments. Chapter V, on causal arguments, has a
sharper and more practical focus. There is more on the use of numbers
and a new section on Web sources, while a few themes that previously
had a section of their own have been blended with others or have migrated
to the appendixes. You'll also notice that the numbering of the rules is
simplified: the rules are now numbered consecutively, from 1 to 45.
My warmest thanks once again go to so many colleagues, friends , and
students for their support and encouragement. For especia ...
Critical and Analytical ThinkingCritical thinkin.docxannettsparrow
Critical and Analytical Thinking
Critical thinkingWord ‘critical’ has positive and negative meaningsThe word ‘critical’ in academia describes your attitude when reading an article/chapterBeing critical means weighing up the arguments for and against a particular point.
*
Not just the bad parts
How to think criticallyBe persistent – consider an issue carefully more than onceLook at the evidence for a viewpoint – evaluate it – what are they trying to ‘sell’ me?What are the implications of a view point – is it realistic and rational?Knowing facts and what is right is not what academics is aboutIt is important to identify strengths, satisfactory points and weaknesses when being critical – then you must know why this is soYou should be critical when reading, writing and listening
*
Need to fully understand an argument before you can be critical – be confident
Evaluate=what is the value/effectiveness of something, inc. own opinion and supporting each point with evidence
Question the credibility
You are just assessing ideas not learning the answers
Only want informed opinions
Analytical thinkingBeing analytical mean to look deeper into what is being saidDo not take what you read as ‘given’Evaluate what is being argued – do you agree with it?To be analytical is to question what you read
*
Not just reading what is said but ‘thinking’ about it
How to think analyticallyThink about the view point in relation to the bigger picture – stand backCompare the same issue from the point of other authors – do their views differ?Should be able to see why authors have arrived at different conclusionsYou should be able to argue why you think one set of view points is preferable to anotherYou should be analytical when reading, writing and listening
*
Think about your readings together, put into context
You should be asking why a conclusion has been made – need full understanding for this
Barriers to critical and analytical thinkingBeing critical does not just mean criticiseOur reasoning skills are not objective – we are biased ourselvesReluctance to criticise expertsWanting to know what is right and wrongNot reading deeply enough around a subject – surface knowledge
*
Not always black and white there are lots of grey areas in academics
Being analytical and critical is hard work, you have to read carefully and widely
Critical and analytical readingPrepare for critical reading – skim read the introduction and conclusionFind the conclusions first to help clarify the rest of the readingWhat is the underlying argument/ view point?Question hidden agendas or assumptionsTheory can help fill in the gaps – what is theory?
- set of ideas to explain why something happens and predict outcomes in the futureArguments are often based on theory but an argument is not always a theory
Critical and analytical readingWhere is the evidence for a view point?Check references – are they presented accurately and are they credible? - evaluate that evidence –.
1 Portfolio Drexel University Critical Reasoning Ph.docxjoyjonna282
1
Portfolio
Drexel University
Critical Reasoning
Philosophy 105
Patrick Denehy
This document provides more information about the portfolio project and guidelines to complete each
content area to the best of your ability. Use the information here and contained in the syllabus to answer
initial questions you may have. And don’t forget to include citations for every piece of text you reference
or use to help you formulate your own work. You can either include a short works cited/bibliography at the
end of each content area, or one large works cited/bibliography encompassing all content areas. Any style
is fine so long as it is consistent.
Meeting
You need to schedule a 30-minute meeting with me during the term. You should bring two content areas of
your choosing with you for review. These need to be full first drafts, not merely ideas or notes. I will read
as much as time permits to provide you feedback on how to improve these pieces of writing and approach
the remaining content areas. I will also give you a sense of where you stand with your APC grade.
Fallacies
For the fallacies content area, you should find examples of fallacies committed in texts or videos.* If all
else fails, create a dialogue between different persons that represents fallacious arguments you have heard
in the past or in which you were personally involved. After providing the fallacy, you should identify the
fallacy and then explain how this text, video, or dialogue commits this fallacy.
Students usually complete this section in one of three ways. One option is to provide a number of
examples with brief explanations (roughly 5-8 fallacies). The second option discusses fewer fallacies in
more depth (roughly 2-3 fallacies). Finally, other students take up some issue of the day and locate a
number of fallacies in arguments surrounding that issue. This third option usually involves discussing
fewer fallacies in depth as well, thereby overlapping with the second option.
Morals and Markets
While some people attempt to respond to the overall claims of Sandel’s book – and this is all well and good
– I encourage everyone to focus on at least two concrete cases or scenarios he raises. This will allow you
to provide a more in-depth response or investigate a case even further. Some people also use this as an
opportunity to perform light research in order to substantiate or criticize various points in the book. Feel
free to bring in other cases that display a dilemma of norms in a market-driven culture.
* You should not simply repeat fallacies from our textbook, another logic textbook, or some website
dedicated to explaining fallacies. There would be no point to such an exercise. The purpose is to display
that you can apply the concept of a fallacy to real-world cases, not ones already identified by others.
Finally, if you are wondering why I have included thi ...
---- Please Follow the instructions ----
Essay #5
Argument Essay
Purpose:
To demonstrate our ability to write a well-supported essay; to show our ability to do accurate works cited pages; to demonstrate our ability to cite sources using MLA format.
Audience:
people who may be unfamiliar with this topic
Paper format:
typed, double-spaced using Times New Roman and 12 pt. font; 1" margins all round; original title; name and date; separate Works Cited page; correct essay formatting and indentation of paragraphs. I will provide you with the correct Works Cited page. All you will have to do is copy it.
Note:
This paper
must
be handed in by the due date.
I will not accept any late papers.
Grade Distribution:
Rough Draft: 30 points
Accurate Works Cited Page: 20 points
Essay: 500 points
Assignment:
Write a 4-5 page argumentative paper on the following topic: Who Needs Privacy? You
must
use the following articles which are in your Week 12 Module to support your thesis and claims: "Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty" by Nicolas Carr; "Web Users Get as Much as They Give" by Jim Harper; and
"Facebook
Is Using You" by Lori Andrews. You
must
have two quotes from each of the three articles related to your topic. I will not accept any other sources that the three mentioned above.
You may not use I believe, I think, or In my opinion anywhere in your essay!
Essay Specifics:
Before you begin writing your essay, it would help if you created an outline to follow. The type of outline you create will depend on whether your readers primarily agree or disagree with you. Below are two examples:
Readers Primarily Agree with You
Strengthen their convictions by organizing your argument around a series of reasons backed by supporting evidence or by refuting opposing arguments point by point.
I. Present the Issue
II. Provide a thesis statement -
a direct statement of your position
III. Present your most plausible reasons and evidence
IV. Concede or refute opposing reasons or objections to your argument
V. Conclude:
Reaffirm your position
Readers Primarily Disagree with You
Begin by emphasizing common ground, and make a concession to show that you have considered the opposing position carefully and with an open mind.
I. Present the Issue:
Reframe the issue in terms of common values
II. Concede:
Acknowledge the wisdom of an aspect of the opposing position
III. Provide a thesis statement
- a direct statement of your position, qualified as necessary
IV. Present your most plausible reasons and evidence
V. Conclude:
Reiterate shared values
Whatever organizational strategy you adopt, do not hesitate to change your outline as necessary while drafting and revising. For instance, you might find it more effective to hold back on presenting your own position until you have discussed unacceptable alternatives. or you might if find a more powerful way to order the reasons for supporting your position. Th.
Lesson 6.2 Activity: Culture and Collective Learning DebateBig History Project
Does culture count as collective learning? Debate this topic with your classmates and decide if cultural changes occur as a direct result of our ability to learn collectively.
Register to explore the whole course here: https://school.bighistoryproject.com/bhplive?WT.mc_id=Slideshare12202017
FOR EACH SET OF RESPONSES I HAVE THE REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS.. pleshantayjewison
FOR EACH SET OF RESPONSES I HAVE THE REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS.. please be sure there are 8 peer responses.. each set has their own instructions
Guided Response:
Respond to at least two of your peers. In responses, provide feedback on how peers’ key skills and qualifications will help get the job to which they are applying. Additionally, provide at least one suggestion on how your peers might emphasize their relevant skills to ensure that they are called in for an interview.
BRANDI’S POST:
Program of study
Bachelor of Arts Degree in Early Childhood Education
The position for which you are applying
Elementary School Teacher
How your field of study has prepared you for this position
My field of study has prepared me to be a teacher by teaching me the necessary skills for educating children. Through the courses that I have taken through this program of study, I have acquired the skills for curriculum planning, inclusion, and collaboration with parents and staff members
A connection you made while volunteering that does not really fit on your resume but will work in your Cover Letter
I volunteered in a second-grade classroom in 2001, while I was in high school, as a teacher’s assistant that gave me great insight into the workings of a classroom environment. This allowed me to see a teacher in action throughout an instructional day and give me the experience of working with children.
MAXINE’S POST:
Program of study:
Bachelors of Arts in Education
The position for which you are applying
Special Education School Teacher
How your field of study has prepared you for this position:
In my field yes and no. Yes because I have learned so much in correct terminology and what our children need in a teacher. No because as a teacher I now Know that I will always be learning new ways to understand our students.
A connection you made while volunteering that does not really fit on your resume but will work in your Cover Letter:
As I moved to Texas I was able to see how families are everything. I was involved in all 3 of my children's learning and afterschool activities as a cares volunteer, substitute teacher, coach or team mom. Being able to see what the teachers are all about helped me to understand as a parent what I needed to do to help my children at home. Now that I am proceeding in the teaching field I learned so many techniques and values from other teachers and coaches.
Respond to Peers:
Review your classmates’ posts, and respond to at least two of your peers by Day 7. When responding to your classmates, please provide feedback on their examples of good and poor critical thinking skills. Discuss additional ways one can think more critically. Each participation post should be a minimum of 75 words.
BRANDON’S POST:
·
Explain at least five elements of critical thinking that you found in the reading material
.
Like I stated in week 1, “Whether you realize it, or not critical thinking is involved in every decision made throug ...
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
5. 3. Collect and interpret
-consider what kind of
evidence there is to support
each potential topic.
5
6. 4. Write a thesis
-the thesis is the central
argument you’re presenting in
your topic.
7. 7
5. Develop and organize your
arguments.
- time to dig in and start
organizing it all in a
cohesive paper.
8. 6. Write a rough draft.
-time for the culmination
of all your hard prep work.
Remember, this version of
your essay doesn’t have to be
perfect.
9. 9
7. Refine your arguments and review.
-are any of this passages you’ve
written repetitive. Is there more
concise way to your point.
10. 8. Get another opinon and finalize
-ask someone to review it.
Fresh eyes can catch small mistakes
in spelling and grammar, or larger
errors in structure or content.
11. 11
2. Incoporating evidence and
textual references to support
arguments
Using Evidence
- a writer must convince her
audience of the validity of her
argument by using evidence
effectively.
12. The process of putting together your argument is
called analysis--it interprets evidence in order to
support, test, and/or refine a claim. The chief
claim in an analytical essay is called the thesis. A
thesis provides the controlling idea for a paper
and should be original (that is, not completely
obvious), assertive, and arguable. A strong thesis
also requires solid evidence to support and
develop it because without evidence, a claim is
merely an unsubstantiated idea or opinion.
13. 13
When Should You Incorporate Evidence?
Once you have formulated your
claim, your thesis (see the WTS
pamphlet, " How to Write a Thesis
Statement," for ideas and tips), you
should use evidence to help strengthen
your thesis and any assertion you make
that relates to your thesis.
14. Offer evidence that agrees
with your stance up to a
point, then add to it with
ideas of your own.
15. 15
Present evidence that contradicts your
stance, and then argue against (refute)
that evidence and therefore strengthen
your position.
16. Use sources against each other, as if they
were experts on a panel discussing your
proposition.
Use quotations to support your assertion,
not merely to state or restate your claim.
Weak and Strong Uses of Evidence
17. 17
In order to use evidence effectively,
you need to integrate it smoothly into
your essay by following this pattern:
State your claim.
Give your evidence, remembering to
relate it to the claim.
18. Comment on the evidence to show how it
supports the claim.
To see the differences between strong and
weak uses of evidence, here are two
paragraphs.
19. 19
Weak use of evidence
Today, we are too self-centered. Most
families no longer sit down to eat
together, preferring instead to eat on the
go while rushing to the next
appointment (Gleick 148). Everything is
about what we want.
20. 20
Stronger use of evidence
This is a far better example, as the
evidence is more smoothly integrated
into the text, the link between the claim
and the evidence is strengthened, and
the evidence itself is analyzed to provide
support for the claim.
21. 21
Using Quotations: A Special Type of
Evidence
One effective way to support your claim is to
use quotations. However, because quotations
involve someone else's words, you need to
take special care to integrate this kind of
evidence into your essay. Here are two
examples using quotations, one less effective
and one more so.
22. 22
Ineffective Use of Quotation
Today, we are too self-centered. "We are
consumers-on-the-run . . . the very
notion of the family meal as a sit-down
occasion is vanishing. Adults and children
alike eat . . . on the way to their next
activity" (Gleick 148). Everything is about
what we want.
23. 23
This example is ineffective because
the quotation is not integrated with
the writer's ideas
24. 24
A More Effective Use of Quotation
Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our
families don't matter as much any more as they
once did. Other people and activities take
precedence, as James Gleick says in his book,
Faster. "We are consumers-on-the-run . . . the
very notion of the family meal as a sit-down
occasion is vanishing. Adults and children alike
eat . . . on the way to their next activity"
25. 25
The second example is more
effective because it follows the
guidelines for incorporating
evidence into an essay.
28. 28
Have I offered my reader evidence to
substantiate each assertion I make in
my paper?
Do I thoroughly explain why/how my
evidence backs up my ideas?
Do I avoid generalizing in my paper
by specifically explaining how my
evidence is representative?
29. 29
Do I provide evidence that not only
confirms but also qualifies my paper's
main claims?
Do I use evidence to test and evolve my
ideas, rather than to just confirm them?
Do I cite my sources thoroughly and
correctly?
30. 30
1.Read more
- An important part of being
analytical involves being alert and
remaining stimulated.
2. Build your mathematical skills
Mathematics involves solving an
equation step-by-step to reach an
answer
31. 31
3. Play brain games
- Brain games challenge you
to think deeply and logically.
32. 32
4. Learn something new
- expanding your knowledge
can improve your analytical
skills.
33. 33
5.Pay attention to detail
-Paying attention to detail and
being observant is a great way to
improve your analytical skills
because it allows you to process
the way things work and interact
34. 34
6. Join a debate club
- Working in a group
setting allows you to come
together with others to discuss
ideas, problems and various
situations
35. 35
• This refers to the interest
of the learners. This is a
critical part of the model as
it is the initial hook of the
learner’s attention.
ATTENTION
36. 36
• This component refers to
the usefulness of the
learning content so the
learner’s could create a
connection between it and
the real world.
RELEVANCE
37. 37
• This component develops
the expectation of success
and progress among the
learners, and at the same
time give the learners the
opportunity to control their
learning processes.
CONFIDENCE
38. 38
7. Take an exercise class
Exercising more frequently can
help improve your cognitive abilities.
Regarding exercise classes,
memorizing the next steps in a
workout routine is a great way to
help develop your analytical skills
39. 39
8. Keep a journal
Recording your day’s events
gives you time to reflect. When
things don’t turn out as planned, you
can learn from these mistakes and
take them into account for your
future actions.
40. 40
9. Ask questions
When someone asks
questions, they’re often asking for
clarification and understanding.
41. 41
10. Download apps
While not all apps can help
improve your analytical skills,
many brain game and
organizational apps can.
42. 42
10. Download apps
-While improving your
analytical skills takes practice,
there are several methods you can
take to ensure you stay motivated