The document discusses grid and concentric zone models used to analyze urban growth and organization. It highlights the limitations of the concentric zone model, developed by Ernest Burgess, in the context of modern cities due to decentralization, technological advancements, and changing socio-economic patterns. Additionally, it mentions alternative models like the multiple nuclei and sector models that better reflect the complexity of contemporary urban development.

1. Grid and
Concentric
Model

2. Grid
Grid models are frameworks used to
organize, analyze, and visualize
relationships or systems in a
structured way, often using a two-
dimensional grid. These models are
common across different fields, such
as urban planning, computer
science, economics, and sociology,
where they help clarify patterns,
structures, or behaviors within
complex systems.
3
3

3. Grid
 In grid models, land is divided by
streets intersect at right angles,
forming a grid. Grid plans are more
common in North American cities than
in Europe, where older cities tend to
be build on streets that radiate out
from a central square or structure of
cultural significance.
4

4. Concentric Zone Model
is a theoretical model used in urban
sociology and human geography to
explain the spatial organization of
cities.
Developed by sociologist Ernest
Burgess in 1925, it describes how
urban areas grow and expand in a
series of concentric rings or zones
radiating out from a central point.
5

5. Concentric Zone Model
The model was based on
the study of Chicago and
was one of the first
systematic attempts to
explain urban social
structures and land use
patterns.

6. Concentric Zone Model
*

7. Concentric Zone Model

8. Concentric Zone Model
While foundational in urban sociology and
geography, has faced challenges in its
applicability to modern cities due to several
limitations. These challenges arise
primarily because the model, developed by
Ernest Burgess in the 1920s, was based on
early 20th-century urban development
patterns in industrial cities like Chicago.
Since then, cities have evolved in more
complex ways, making the model less
applicable in many contemporary contexts.

9.  Here are the key
reasons why the
Concentric Zone
Model has been
challenged:

10. 1. Urban Growth and Modernization:
Decentralization and Suburbanization
Suburban Sprawl: refers to the uncontrolled,
low-density expansion of residential,
commercial, and industrial development into
rural or undeveloped areas on the outskirts
of cities. This phenomenon often results in
widespread, car-dependent communities
characterized by single-family homes, strip
malls, office parks, and large parking lots.

11. 2. Transportation and Technology:
Automobile Dependency
Telecommunications and
Remote Work

12. 3.Geographical Constraints and Variations:
Natural Features
Irregular Urban Patterns

13. 4. Economic and Social Shifts:
Gentrification: refers to the process of
transforming urban neighborhoods,
typically low-income or working-class
areas, through an influx of more affluent
residents and businesses.
Decline of the CBD

14. 5. Globalization and Immigration:
Ethnic Enclaves: The model assumes
that social classes and economic status
are the primary drivers of urban
structure. However, in many cities, ethnic
or immigrant communities form their own
distinct neighborhoods, which may not
follow the economic patterns predicted
by the model. These neighborhoods can
exist in various zones of the city, not just
in the "transitional zone" near the CBD.

15. 5. Globalization and Immigration:
Global City Models: Many large,
global cities (New York,
London, Tokyo) do not follow
the simplistic pattern of the
concentric zone model. They
have complex, multi-centered
urban patterns driven by global
trade, finance, and immigration
that are more dynamic than the
model's structure.

16. 6. Rise of the Multiple Nuclei Model and
Sector Model:
 Urban theorists like Harris and Ullman
developed the Multiple Nuclei Model to
explain how cities grow around multiple
centers of activity, such as business districts,
industrial areas, and residential zones.
Similarly, the Sector Model by Homer Hoyt
introduced the idea that urban growth often
occurs in sectors or wedges along
transportation routes rather than in
concentric rings.
 These alternative models provide a more
accurate explanation of the complexity of
modern urban development, making the
concentric zone model seem overly simplistic.

17. 7. Applicability to Non-Western Cities:
 The concentric zone model is based on the
patterns observed in American industrial cities,
particularly Chicago in the early 20th century.
Its applicability to cities in other parts of the
world, especially in developing countries, is
limited. Cities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
often have different growth patterns driven by
colonial histories, informal settlements, and
rapid urbanization, which do not conform to the
concentric ring pattern.

18. Therefore:
While the Concentric Zone Model was an
important early attempt to explain urban growth
and social organization, it has been increasingly
challenged by the complex, decentralized, and
multi-nucleated nature of modern cities. Factors
such as transportation, technology,
gentrification, globalization, and geographical
constraints make the model less relevant in
contemporary urban planning. However, it
remains a valuable starting point for
understanding historical urban growth patterns
and continues to influence urban geography
studies.

19. Sectoral Model
 In 1939, the economist Homer
Hoyt adapted the concentric
ring model by proposing
that cities develop in wedge-
shaped sectors instead of rings.
Certain areas of a city
are more attractive for various
activities, whether by chance or
geographic/environmental
reasons.

20. Sectoral Model
21

21. How we get there
ROI
• Envision multimedia-
based expertise and cross-
media growth strategies​
• Visualize
quality intellectual capital​
• Engage
worldwide methodologies
with web-enabled
technologies​
Niche markets
• Pursue scalable
customer service
through sustainable
strategies​
• Engage top-line
web services with
cutting-edge
deliverables
Supply chains
• Cultivate one-to-
one customer
service with robust
ideas​
• Maximize
timely deliverables
for real-
time schemas

22. Summary
At Contoso, we believe in giving 110%. By using
our next-generation data architecture, we help
organizations virtually manage agile workflows.
We thrive because of our market knowledge and
great team behind our product. As our CEO says,
"Efficiencies will come from proactively
transforming how we do business."​
​

23. Thank
you!