SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013
The Roger Goodell Compensation Controversy:
Equitable or Excessive Pay?
An Objective Peer Group Analysis
By Jack Connell and David Dreyfus
National Football League Commissioner Roger Goodell’s ubiquitous product, an integral part of the American
entertainment market, makes him one of the most well-known chief executives in the country. Recently, his
compensation made the news. As a nonprofit entity the NFL publicly discloses the compensation of its officers,
and in 2011 Mr. Goodell received a total compensation package worth $29.5M. This consisted of $3.1M in
salary, a bonus amount of $25.4M and $4.1M in other compensation and benefits.
To the casual observer, this might seem like an outsized compensation package, but that perception might be
challenged upon closer scrutiny. Outsized compared to what or whom? At Connell & Partners, a division of
Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. (GBS), we carefully analyze executive compensation against executives’ true
market for their talent as well as shareholders’ expectations. The following article is how we would have
analyzed Mr. Goodell’s compensation had the NFL asked.
The Peer Group
The basis for much of our analysis is a peer group of companies. This is a best practice that most public
companies use to compare compensation as well as relative financial performance. GBS constructs our peer
groups based on a client’s General Industry Classification Standard codes, or GICS codes, a process that is similar
to the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) method. GICS codes come in 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-digit varieties,
increasing in order of granularity. The 2-digit code is the broadest definition of a company’s industry and the
8-digit is the most specific.
Once we have the initial pool of comparator firms we refine it by revenue and market capitalization, targeting
firms that have financials between 1/2–2x or 1/3–3x of our client’s (the comparator firm). In order to have a
sufficient pool of companies to choose from, we expand those financial ranges and/or move toward less
granular levels of the GICS code. Above all, we are crafting a market for executive talent with an understanding
that some flexibility exists related to industry and company size. We aim to place our client at the median for
both revenue and market capitalization, as cash compensation is largely tied to a company’s revenue and the
same can be said for equity compensation and market capitalization.
For the analysis of Mr. Goodell’s compensation, GBS was presented with the challenge of constructing a peer
group for a non-public “company” without publicly disclosed revenues. This meant that not only would we lack
a true market capitalization, but we would also have to approximate relative performance. We sourced our NFL
revenue data from Plunkett Research, Ltd., a provider of market research, industry statistics, trends and in-
depth analysis of top companies. Their estimate of total NFL revenue for the last completed fiscal year is $9.5B.
The previous year’s revenue was estimated at $9B.
©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013
Our calculation for market capitalization relied on an annual analysis of NFL franchise values. The analysis has
been done by Forbes for several years and provides the franchises’ value, debt percentage, revenue and
operating income. We used the sum of the 32 NFL franchise values net their debt, which was $28.7B according
to Forbes’ September 2012 analysis. We recognize that each of the franchises is owned independently
(or publicly by the citizens of Green Bay in the case of the Packers). However, for the purposes of this analysis,
we see each of those individual owners as akin to division managers, responsible for the financial outcome of
their own geography but inextricably linked to the fortunes of the other divisions. The owners are also the
shareholders and board of directors, responsible for hiring and compensating Mr. Goodell to manage the
organization on their behalf.
Due to the large size of the NFL, GBS was forced to examine the broadest industry scope available, the 2-digit
GICS code for Consumer Discretionary products. We chose this GICS because it includes media, entertainment
and other companies that rely heavily on management of their brands. It includes all of the NFL’s broadcast
distribution partners (ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox and DIRECTV) and one of its merchandising partners (Nike). If Mr.
Goodell ever left the NFL, or the NFL sought a new commissioner from the outside, the chief executives of these
firms would surely be on the NFL’s radar.
Using the process, GBS built the following executive compensation peer group for the NFL:
Notes: Revenue data sources: Companies – S&P Research Insight; NFL – Plunkett Research, Ltd. Market capitalizations as of 3/1/13.
No, not every peer group company is a direct product or service competitor. However, each is a large American
company with significant brand equity.
Company Ticker Location
Revenue - FY
($B)
Revenue - Last 4Q
($B)
Market Capitalization
($B)
CBSCorp. CBS NewYork, NY $14.1 $14.1 $27.3
DIRECTV DTV El Segundo, CA $29.7 $29.7 $27.6
Discovery Communications, Inc. DISCA Silver Spring, MD $4.5 $4.5 $17.2
Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG Milwaukee, WI $5.6 $5.6 $11.9
Las Vegas Sands Corp. LVS Las Vegas, NV $9.4 $11.1 $42.4
Mattel, Inc. MAT El Segundo, CA $6.4 $6.4 $14.0
McDonald's Corp. MCD Oak Brook, IL $27.6 $27.6 $96.2
Netflix, Inc. NFLX Los Gatos, CA $3.6 $3.6 $10.5
Nike, Inc. NKE Beaverton, OR $24.1 $24.7 $39.0
OmnicomGroup OMC NewYork, NY $14.2 $14.2 $15.0
Priceline.com, Inc. PCLN Norwalk, CT $5.3 $5.3 $34.4
Sirius XMRadio, Inc. SIRI NewYork, NY $3.4 $3.4 $20.4
Starbucks Corp. SBUX Seattle, WA $13.3 $13.7 $41.1
TimeWarner Cable, Inc. TWC NewYork, NY $21.4 $21.4 $25.5
Viacom, Inc. VIAB NewYork, NY $13.9 $13.2 $29.1
VirginMedia, Inc. VMED NewYork, NY $6.7 $6.7 $12.5
Walt Disney Co. DIS Burbank, CA $42.3 $42.8 $98.6
WynnResorts Ltd. WYNN Las Vegas, NV $5.2 $5.2 $11.8
Yum! Brands, Inc. YUM Louisville, KY $13.6 $13.6 $29.5
Peer Group25thPercentile $5.4 $5.4 $14.5
Peer Group50thPercentile $13.3 $13.2 $27.3
Peer Group75thPercentile $17.8 $17.8 $36.7
National Football League NFL NewYork, NY $9.5 $9.5 $28.7
Percentile WithinPeer Group 45 42 59
Notes:
Source: S&PResearchInsight
Market capitalizations as of 3/1/13
©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013
Benchmarking
Once the peer group has been established, GBS benchmarks against the appropriate executive matches at the
peer group companies. Compensation data for public companies is found in the DEF-14A filing, commonly
known as the proxy. We break down compensation into cash, long-term incentive (LTI) and other compensation,
and then categorize further from there. Cash compensation is composed of an executive fixed-base salary and
any short-term incentive (STI). STI can be a discretionary, non-formulaic bonus or a more quantitative non-
equity incentive program (NEIP). We gather both the target values for STI and the actual bonus distributions.
LTI compensation is broken down by grants of options, time-based restricted shares and performance-vesting
restricted shares. To value the options, GBS used the grant date fair value, usually the Black-Scholes value,
disclosed by the company. Time- and performance-vesting shares were valued at the target distribution of
shares. Many companies do not make consistent annual LTI grants, and in those cases we “annualize” the LTI
value in order to approximate the normalized value that the company intends to deliver to its executives.
Other compensation is sort of a catch-all for non-cash delivery of extraordinary benefits and perquisites to
executives. These can vary substantially by company and executive within each company. Typical perquisites
include supplementary medical exam coverage, use of company vehicles, personal and family security, financial
planning and tax preparation, and company contributions to supplemental retirement plans. The following peer
group data was gathered to make our assessment of Mr. Goodell’s compensation:
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14
A B C = (A+B) D E = (A + D) F G H I = (F+G+H) J = (C+I) K = (E+I) L M = (K+L)
Total Cash Compensation ($K) Annual Long-Term Incentives ($K) Total Comp. ($K)
Base
Salary
Actual
Bonus /
STI
Actual
Total Cash
Target
Bonus /
STI
(% Base)
Target
Total Cash
Stock
Options
Restricted
Stock
Perf.
Awards
Total
Other
Comp.
Total
Direct +
Indirect
CBS Corp. President and CEO $3,500 $27,500 $31,000 343% $15,500 $27,317 $4,250 $4,250 $35,817 $66,817 $51,317 $1,605 $68,422
DIRECTV
Chairman, President
and CEO
$1,518 $3,900 $5,418 200% $4,560 $4,166 $0 $4,897 $9,063 $14,480 $13,622 $318 $14,798
Discovery Communications, Inc. President and CEO $2,962 $4,838 $7,799 169% $7,962 $23,873 $0 $20,301 $44,174 $51,974 $52,136 $430 $52,404
Harley-Davidson, Inc. President and CEO $975 $2,803 $3,778 283% $3,738 $1,735 $1,544 $0 $3,279 $7,057 $7,016 $175 $7,232
Las Vegas Sands Corp
Chairman of the
Board, CEO and
Treasurer
$1,000 $6,304 $7,304 396% $4,957 $1,825 $1,825 $0 $3,650 $10,954 $8,607 $2,891 $13,845
Mattel, Inc. CEO $1,250 $1,901 $3,151 130% $2,875 $2,297 $2,333 $922 $5,553 $8,704 $8,428 $283 $8,987
McDonald's Corp.
Vice Chairman and
CEO
$1,473 $3,300 $4,773 151% $3,693 $1,797 $0 $1,429 $3,226 $7,999 $6,919 $752 $8,751
Netflix, Inc.
CEO, President,
Chairman of the
Board
$500 $0 $500 N/A N/A $8,788 $0 $0 $8,788 $9,288 N/A $1 $9,289
Nike, Inc. President and CEO $1,550 $6,206 $7,756 344% $6,875 $3,648 $7,500 $0 $11,148 $18,904 $18,023 $308 $19,213
Omnicom Group President and CEO $1,000 $9,981 $10,981 840% $9,400 $0 $0 $2,139 $2,139 $13,120 $11,539 $161 $13,282
Priceline.com President and CEO $550 $4,000 $4,550 300% $2,200 $0 $0 $4,500 $4,500 $9,050 $6,700 $8 $9,058
Sirius XM Radio, Inc. CEO $1,500 $9,200 $10,700 N/A N/A $3,521 $0 $0 $3,521 $14,221 N/A $7 $14,228
Starbucks Corp.
Chairman, President
and CEO
$1,483 $2,309 $3,791 152% $3,733 $6,898 $0 $18,000 $24,898 $28,689 $28,631 $221 $28,910
Time Warner Cable, Inc. Chairman and CEO $1,250 $7,211 $8,461 500% $7,500 $2,829 $0 $4,592 $7,422 $15,882 $14,922 $439 $16,322
Viacom, Inc.
President and CEO,
Director
$3,500 $11,500 $15,000 343% $15,500 $6,000 $0 $12,127 $18,127 $33,127 $33,627 $269 $33,396
Virgin Media, Inc. CEO $1,203 $1,131 $2,334 100% $2,407 $1,166 $0 $2,538 $3,704 $6,038 $6,111 $297 $6,336
Walt Disney Co. Chairman and CEO $2,500 $16,520 $19,020 480% $14,500 $7,750 $0 $9,533 $17,283 $36,303 $31,783 $801 $37,103
Wynn Resorts Ltd Chairman and CEO $3,879 $11,063 $14,941 234% $12,941 N/A N/A N/A N/A $14,941 $12,941 $1,533 $16,475
Yum Brands, Inc.
Chairman, CEO and
President
$1,474 $4,541 $6,015 157% $3,794 $5,807 $0 $773 $6,580 $12,595 $10,374 $309 $12,905
Peer Group 25th Percentile $1,102 $3,052 $4,171 157% $3,733 $1,804 $0 $193 $3,663 $9,169 $8,428 $198 $9,173
Peer Group 50th Percentile $1,474 $4,838 $7,304 283% $4,957 $3,585 $0 $2,338 $7,001 $14,221 $12,941 $308 $14,228
Peer Group 75th Percentile $2,025 $9,591 $10,841 344% $9,400 $6,673 $1,158 $4,821 $15,749 $23,797 $28,631 $596 $24,061
National Football League Commissioner $3,117 $22,309 $25,426 $25,426 $4,064 $29,490
Percentile within Peer Group 85 97 97 76 100 78
N/AN/A N/A
Actual
Total
Direct
($K)
Target
Total
Direct
($K)
Company Title
Notes:
DIRECTV (Chairman, President and CEO) – LTI: Represents annualized LTI.
Mattel, Inc. (CEO) – TOTAL OWNERSHIP: Represents annualized LTI. Executive retired at the end of the fiscal year.
Netflix, Inc. (CEO, President, Chairman of the Board) – BONUS/NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN: Company does not have a cash bonus plan.
Nike, Inc. (President and CEO) – LTI: Represents annualized LTI. Executive received a $20M RSU retention grant with a 5-year vest.
Sirius XM Radio, Inc. (CEO) – BONUS/NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN: Executive’s bonus is determined by the funding of an executive bonus pool, which is 2.75%
of EBITDA.
Starbucks Corp. (Chairman, President and CEO) – LTI: Represents annualized LTI. Executive previously received a $35M option retention grant with a 10-year vest.
Wynn Resorts Ltd (Chairman and CEO) – LTI: Executive owns 10% of the company and does not participate in the LTI program.
©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013
The data shows that Mr. Goodell is above the 75th
percentile for cash compensation, actual total direct
compensation and total direct and indirect compensation. Because the NFL cannot offer equity in the company,
all of Mr. Goodell’s compensation must be in cash or other benefits. Accordingly, we expect his total cash
compensation to far exceed the peer group norms, given that the majority of public company CEO
compensation is in the form of LTI. However, his total compensation package still exceeds the 75th
percentile of
the peer group. In the next section, we examine whether or not this is justified.
Pay-for-Performance Assessment
Executive compensation does not occur in a vacuum. A company needs to consider not only how the dollar
value of CEO compensation compares to the peer group, but how the company performed against those peers.
This will give an indication of whether or not a company is truly paying for performance. Proxy advisory services
use relative peer group performance as a major input into their recommendations to vote for or against a
company’s proxy vote, as and on the non-binding say-on-pay votes. The most common way to measure a
company’s performance is total shareholder return (TSR). TSR is the increase in stock price plus any dividend
distributions.
Because the NFL is not a publically traded entity, GBS had to calculate the TSR for the NFL’s shareholder in a
different manner. Here we used the change in the equity value of each team assigned by Forbes, and treated the
operating income as shareholder dividends.1
Based on this method the NFL had an annual TSR of 14.0%,
approximately the peer group median. The NFL also had revenue growth of 5.6%, the peer group 25th
percentile.
Note: Compensation and financial metrics are displayed in descending order. Chart is not meant to be read linearly.
1
This method of calculating the NFL’s return was validated by professors Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel of University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business
in their paper The Economics of NFL Team Ownership. This report was prepared at the request of the National Football League Players’ Association.
Base Salary
($K)
Actual
Bonus/STI
($K)
Actual Total
Cash
($K)
Actual Total
Direct
Comp.
($K)
Actual Total
Direct &
Indirect
Comp.
($K)
1-Year Total
Shrhldr.
Return
Revenue
Growth
A National Football League $3,879 S $27,500 B $31,000 B $66,817 B $68,422 B 76.1% R 50.2% F
B CBS Corp. $3,500 B $22,309 A $25,426 A $51,974 D $52,404 D 44.5% B 48.2% I
C DIRECTV $3,500 P $16,520 R $19,020 R $36,303 R $37,103 R 41.4% P 41.2% L
D Discovery Communications, Inc. $3,117 A $11,500 P $15,000 P $33,127 P $33,396 P 37.9% N 25.9% S
E Harley-Davidson, Inc. $2,962 D $11,063 S $14,941 S $28,689 N $29,490 A 34.6% H 15.7% J
F Las Vegas Sands Corp $2,500 R $9,981 K $10,981 K $25,426 A $28,910 N 30.4% J 13.7% N
G Mattel, Inc. $1,550 J $9,200 M $10,700 M $18,904 J $19,213 J 22.7% T 13.0% C
H McDonald's Corp. $1,518 C $7,211 O $8,461 O $15,882 O $16,475 S 17.1% L 12.2% D
I Netflix, Inc. $1,500 M $6,304 F $7,799 D $14,941 S $16,322 O 14.0% A 12.2% H
J Nike, Inc. $1,483 N $6,206 J $7,756 J $14,480 C $14,798 C 13.5% E 11.3% T
K Omnicom Group $1,474 T $4,838 D $7,304 F $14,221 M $14,228 M 13.0% G 10.6% K
L Priceline.com $1,473 H $4,541 T $6,015 T $13,120 K $13,845 F 12.0% S 9.3% E
M Sirius XM Radio, Inc. $1,250 G $4,000 L $5,418 C $12,595 T $13,282 K 11.6% M 7.0% M
N Starbucks Corp. $1,250 O $3,900 C $4,773 H $10,954 F $12,905 T 7.1% C 7.0% G
O Time Warner Cable, Inc. $1,203 Q $3,300 H $4,550 L $9,288 I $9,289 I -0.4% K 5.6% A
P Viacom, Inc. $1,000 F $2,803 E $3,791 N $9,050 L $9,058 L -1.0% O 4.3% O
Q Virgin Media, Inc. $1,000 K $2,309 N $3,778 E $8,704 G $8,987 G -1.8% D 4.0% Q
R Walt Disney Co. $975 E $1,901 G $3,151 G $7,999 H $8,751 H -7.0% F 3.4% R
S Wynn Resorts Ltd $550 L $1,131 Q $2,334 Q $7,057 E $7,232 E -21.0% Q 1.3% B
T Yum Brands, Inc. $500 I $0 I $500 I $6,038 Q $6,336 Q -60.6% I -6.9% P
85 97 97 76 78 56 25
Notes:
Compensation and financial metrics are displayed in descending order. Chart is not meant to be read linearly.
CEO Compensation
Percentile within Peer Group
Financial Performance
Percentile within Peer Group
Peer Group Companies
©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013
Note: CBS and DISCA (Discovery Communications, Inc.) CEO pay has been displayed lower to allow for greater chart granularity.
Overall Assessment
It is the opinion of GBS that Mr. Goodell’s compensation is within market norms. We arrived at this conclusion
through both an objective and subjective assessment. Mr. Goodell has a unique compensation structure
because it is all cash, and his overall compensation package is positioned at approximately the 75th
percentile of
the peer group in terms of dollar value. However, because he does not have the ability to receive equity grants,
this is the extent of value he can realize from his employer’s performance.
All the other peer group CEOs have significant equity holdings in their companies and the ability to further gain
from LTI compensation. Accordingly, the capital gains they realize from shareholder return is a significant
portion of the compensation they receive. Furthermore, cash compensation presents a less favorable tax
treatment than time- or performance-vested equity that can be eligible for capital gains treatment as opposed
to higher ordinary income rates. As long as the NFL continues its impressive growth and unprecedented
popularity, Commissioner Goodell will continue to be one of America’s most highly paid (if not admired)
executives.
This analysis is not based on an actual client situation, and is meant for informational purposes only. The analysis is in no way intended to be used as a primary basis
for benefits, fiduciary, or securities decisions. Similar results are not guaranteed and will vary based upon the individual client situations. You should
consult with financial, tax, legal, and accounting advisors before implementing any plan or course of action. Neither the information presented nor any
opinion expressed constitutes a contract or a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any product.
The charts and other data contained in this document are hypothetical and are for illustrative purposes only. The information has been made available to
you as self-help tools for your independent use and is not intended to provide investment advice. Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc., its affiliates or
representatives cannot and do not guarantee their applicability or accuracy in regards to your individual circumstances.
CBS
DTV
DISCA
HOG
LVS
MAT
MCD
NFLX
NKE
OMC
PCLN
SIRI
SBUX
TWC
VIAB
VMED
DIS
WYNN
YUM
NFL
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000
CEO Total Direct Compensation($K) vs. Total Shareholder Return

More Related Content

What's hot

black&decker BDK2Q08EarningsRelease
black&decker BDK2Q08EarningsReleaseblack&decker BDK2Q08EarningsRelease
black&decker BDK2Q08EarningsReleasefinance44
 
BDK3Q07Release
BDK3Q07ReleaseBDK3Q07Release
BDK3Q07Releasefinance44
 
Northwestern Mutual 2009 annual report
Northwestern Mutual 2009 annual reportNorthwestern Mutual 2009 annual report
Northwestern Mutual 2009 annual reportGary Tsang
 
Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021
Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021 Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021
Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021 Mercer Capital
 
standardchartere 2007 Annual Letter to Stockholders -
standardchartere 2007 Annual  Letter to Stockholders -standardchartere 2007 Annual  Letter to Stockholders -
standardchartere 2007 Annual Letter to Stockholders -QuarterlyEarningsReports3
 
Raising Debt vs. Equity
Raising Debt vs. EquityRaising Debt vs. Equity
Raising Debt vs. EquityPramod Jindal
 
Wake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redacted
Wake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redactedWake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redacted
Wake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redactedMona Ashour
 
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. EquityWinfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equitysubhash kalal
 
Is Executive Compensation Excessive
Is Executive Compensation ExcessiveIs Executive Compensation Excessive
Is Executive Compensation ExcessiveJames Sillery
 
Services - Tokyo Investor Presentation
Services - Tokyo Investor PresentationServices - Tokyo Investor Presentation
Services - Tokyo Investor Presentationfinance8
 
S. Jordan Associates
S.  Jordan  AssociatesS.  Jordan  Associates
S. Jordan AssociatesScottJordan
 
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate PlanningMyer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate PlanningInKnowVision
 
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate PlanningMyer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate PlanningInKnowVision
 
2002 Nationwide Annual Report
2002 Nationwide Annual Report2002 Nationwide Annual Report
2002 Nationwide Annual Reportfinance11
 

What's hot (15)

black&decker BDK2Q08EarningsRelease
black&decker BDK2Q08EarningsReleaseblack&decker BDK2Q08EarningsRelease
black&decker BDK2Q08EarningsRelease
 
BDK3Q07Release
BDK3Q07ReleaseBDK3Q07Release
BDK3Q07Release
 
Northwestern Mutual 2009 annual report
Northwestern Mutual 2009 annual reportNorthwestern Mutual 2009 annual report
Northwestern Mutual 2009 annual report
 
Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021
Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021 Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021
Mercer Capital's Value Matters™ | Issue 2 2021
 
standardchartere 2007 Annual Letter to Stockholders -
standardchartere 2007 Annual  Letter to Stockholders -standardchartere 2007 Annual  Letter to Stockholders -
standardchartere 2007 Annual Letter to Stockholders -
 
Raising Debt vs. Equity
Raising Debt vs. EquityRaising Debt vs. Equity
Raising Debt vs. Equity
 
Wake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redacted
Wake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redactedWake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redacted
Wake up and smell the new M&A Imperative jan 2019 Bank Director AOBA - redacted
 
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. EquityWinfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equity
 
Is Executive Compensation Excessive
Is Executive Compensation ExcessiveIs Executive Compensation Excessive
Is Executive Compensation Excessive
 
Services - Tokyo Investor Presentation
Services - Tokyo Investor PresentationServices - Tokyo Investor Presentation
Services - Tokyo Investor Presentation
 
S. Jordan Associates
S.  Jordan  AssociatesS.  Jordan  Associates
S. Jordan Associates
 
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate PlanningMyer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever- InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
 
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate PlanningMyer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
Myer Family Wealth Goal Achiever - InKnowVision Advanced Estate Planning
 
company-of-destiny
company-of-destinycompany-of-destiny
company-of-destiny
 
2002 Nationwide Annual Report
2002 Nationwide Annual Report2002 Nationwide Annual Report
2002 Nationwide Annual Report
 

Viewers also liked

2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 final
2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 final2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 final
2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 finalConnell & Partners
 
Internships: What They Are & How To Get Them
Internships: What They Are & How To Get ThemInternships: What They Are & How To Get Them
Internships: What They Are & How To Get Themlmdejose
 
Social Media & Networking How-To
Social Media & Networking How-ToSocial Media & Networking How-To
Social Media & Networking How-Tolmdejose
 
Greenlink & your job search
Greenlink & your job searchGreenlink & your job search
Greenlink & your job searchlmdejose
 
Career Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter Basics
Career Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter BasicsCareer Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter Basics
Career Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter Basicslmdejose
 
Relative Performanace in Bonus Plans
Relative Performanace in Bonus PlansRelative Performanace in Bonus Plans
Relative Performanace in Bonus PlansConnell & Partners
 
Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)
Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)
Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)Liesbeth Vervloet
 
E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)
E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)
E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)Liesbeth Vervloet
 
Témoignage Coworking CETIC
Témoignage Coworking CETIC Témoignage Coworking CETIC
Témoignage Coworking CETIC Lisa Lombardi
 
Guia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOC
Guia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOCGuia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOC
Guia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOCAlejandro Videla
 

Viewers also liked (18)

Exec Comp Peer Groups
Exec Comp Peer GroupsExec Comp Peer Groups
Exec Comp Peer Groups
 
2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 final
2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 final2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 final
2013 ipo executive compensation study 1 21 13 final
 
Internships: What They Are & How To Get Them
Internships: What They Are & How To Get ThemInternships: What They Are & How To Get Them
Internships: What They Are & How To Get Them
 
Social Media & Networking How-To
Social Media & Networking How-ToSocial Media & Networking How-To
Social Media & Networking How-To
 
Greenlink & your job search
Greenlink & your job searchGreenlink & your job search
Greenlink & your job search
 
Career Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter Basics
Career Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter BasicsCareer Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter Basics
Career Development Workshop: Resume and Cover Letter Basics
 
Proxy table changes 021513
Proxy table changes 021513Proxy table changes 021513
Proxy table changes 021513
 
Relative Performanace in Bonus Plans
Relative Performanace in Bonus PlansRelative Performanace in Bonus Plans
Relative Performanace in Bonus Plans
 
Exec comp peer groups doc (2)
Exec comp peer groups doc (2)Exec comp peer groups doc (2)
Exec comp peer groups doc (2)
 
Nokia meso omgeving
Nokia meso omgevingNokia meso omgeving
Nokia meso omgeving
 
Research community brazil
Research community brazilResearch community brazil
Research community brazil
 
Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)
Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)
Mobile marketing app zoo van antwerpen (met aline julia)
 
E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)
E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)
E-mailmarketingstrategie Mount Oberon (Project EMS DMC 2013)
 
Yahoo ceo pay package v3
Yahoo ceo pay package v3Yahoo ceo pay package v3
Yahoo ceo pay package v3
 
Yahoo ceo pay package v3
Yahoo ceo pay package v3Yahoo ceo pay package v3
Yahoo ceo pay package v3
 
Animal powerpoint
Animal powerpointAnimal powerpoint
Animal powerpoint
 
Témoignage Coworking CETIC
Témoignage Coworking CETIC Témoignage Coworking CETIC
Témoignage Coworking CETIC
 
Guia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOC
Guia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOCGuia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOC
Guia argentina de tratamiento de la EPOC
 

Similar to Goodell v3 06112013 final

ARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity Incentives
ARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity IncentivesARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity Incentives
ARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity IncentivesTrading Game Pty Ltd
 
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docxThe knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docxoreo10
 
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docxThe knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docxcherry686017
 
October Webinar
October WebinarOctober Webinar
October Webinardlinehan2
 
Chapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docx
Chapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docxChapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docx
Chapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docxcravennichole326
 
MBA - 621 Final Exam.docx
MBA - 621 Final Exam.docxMBA - 621 Final Exam.docx
MBA - 621 Final Exam.docxStacey Troup
 
Coca Cola Financial Review
Coca Cola Financial ReviewCoca Cola Financial Review
Coca Cola Financial ReviewStacey Troup
 
omnicom group 2007 Annual Report
omnicom group 2007 Annual Reportomnicom group 2007 Annual Report
omnicom group 2007 Annual Reportfinance22
 
omnicare annual reports 2007
omnicare annual reports 2007omnicare annual reports 2007
omnicare annual reports 2007finance46
 
(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docx
(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docx(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docx
(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docxmercysuttle
 
Business 7 ms fast start
Business   7 ms fast startBusiness   7 ms fast start
Business 7 ms fast startRichard Go
 
Business 7 ms fast start
Business   7 ms fast startBusiness   7 ms fast start
Business 7 ms fast startRichard Go
 
Baird ESG Investor Conference
Baird ESG Investor ConferenceBaird ESG Investor Conference
Baird ESG Investor ConferenceWinnebagoInd
 
FinanceTest ISummer 20191. Using the following data, prepare a .docx
FinanceTest ISummer 20191.  Using the following data, prepare a .docxFinanceTest ISummer 20191.  Using the following data, prepare a .docx
FinanceTest ISummer 20191. Using the following data, prepare a .docxericn8
 
Report template gme v5
Report template gme v5Report template gme v5
Report template gme v5olexmat
 

Similar to Goodell v3 06112013 final (20)

Ceo tham khảo
Ceo tham khảoCeo tham khảo
Ceo tham khảo
 
CEO Compensation: Data Spotlight
CEO Compensation: Data SpotlightCEO Compensation: Data Spotlight
CEO Compensation: Data Spotlight
 
ARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity Incentives
ARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity IncentivesARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity Incentives
ARE CEOS PAID FOR PERFORMANCE? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Equity Incentives
 
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docxThe knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
 
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docxThe knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
The knock on most business leaders is that they don’t take the.docx
 
P&g
P&gP&g
P&g
 
October Webinar
October WebinarOctober Webinar
October Webinar
 
Chapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docx
Chapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docxChapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docx
Chapter 1KEY TERMS Define each of the following termsa. Sar.docx
 
MBA - 621 Final Exam.docx
MBA - 621 Final Exam.docxMBA - 621 Final Exam.docx
MBA - 621 Final Exam.docx
 
Coca Cola Financial Review
Coca Cola Financial ReviewCoca Cola Financial Review
Coca Cola Financial Review
 
omnicom group 2007 Annual Report
omnicom group 2007 Annual Reportomnicom group 2007 Annual Report
omnicom group 2007 Annual Report
 
omnicare annual reports 2007
omnicare annual reports 2007omnicare annual reports 2007
omnicare annual reports 2007
 
Six question
Six questionSix question
Six question
 
(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docx
(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docx(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docx
(TCO A) Which one of the following is an advantage of corporatio.docx
 
Business 7 ms fast start
Business   7 ms fast startBusiness   7 ms fast start
Business 7 ms fast start
 
Business 7 ms fast start
Business   7 ms fast startBusiness   7 ms fast start
Business 7 ms fast start
 
Baird ESG Investor Conference
Baird ESG Investor ConferenceBaird ESG Investor Conference
Baird ESG Investor Conference
 
FinanceTest ISummer 20191. Using the following data, prepare a .docx
FinanceTest ISummer 20191.  Using the following data, prepare a .docxFinanceTest ISummer 20191.  Using the following data, prepare a .docx
FinanceTest ISummer 20191. Using the following data, prepare a .docx
 
Report template gme v5
Report template gme v5Report template gme v5
Report template gme v5
 
Lehman Brothers Annual Report 2007
Lehman Brothers Annual Report 2007Lehman Brothers Annual Report 2007
Lehman Brothers Annual Report 2007
 

Recently uploaded

Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts ServiceVip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Serviceankitnayak356677
 
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni
 
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...Dave Litwiller
 
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine ServiceCall Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Serviceritikaroy0888
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMRavindra Nath Shukla
 
VIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Pune
VIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service PuneVIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Pune
VIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service PuneCall girls in Ahmedabad High profile
 
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.Aaiza Hassan
 
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan CommunicationsPharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communicationskarancommunications
 
GD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementGD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementchhavia330
 
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMANA DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMANIlamathiKannappan
 
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc.../:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...lizamodels9
 
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst SummitProgress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst SummitHolger Mueller
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...lizamodels9
 
Vip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dewas
Vip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service DewasVip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dewas
Vip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dewasmakika9823
 
Insurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usage
Insurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usageInsurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usage
Insurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usageMatteo Carbone
 
Non Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptx
Non Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptxNon Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptx
Non Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptxAbhayThakur200703
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,noida100girls
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts ServiceVip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
 
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
 
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
 
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine ServiceCall Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
 
VIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Pune
VIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service PuneVIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Pune
VIP Call Girls Pune Kirti 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Pune
 
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
 
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan CommunicationsPharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
 
GD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementGD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in management
 
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMANA DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMAN
 
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc.../:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
 
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst SummitProgress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
 
Vip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dewas
Vip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service DewasVip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dewas
Vip Dewas Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dewas
 
Insurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usage
Insurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usageInsurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usage
Insurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usage
 
Non Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptx
Non Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptxNon Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptx
Non Text Magic Studio Magic Design for Presentations L&P.pptx
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
 
KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)
KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)
KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)
 
Best Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting Partnership
Best Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting PartnershipBest Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting Partnership
Best Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting Partnership
 
Forklift Operations: Safety through Cartoons
Forklift Operations: Safety through CartoonsForklift Operations: Safety through Cartoons
Forklift Operations: Safety through Cartoons
 

Goodell v3 06112013 final

  • 1. ©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013 The Roger Goodell Compensation Controversy: Equitable or Excessive Pay? An Objective Peer Group Analysis By Jack Connell and David Dreyfus National Football League Commissioner Roger Goodell’s ubiquitous product, an integral part of the American entertainment market, makes him one of the most well-known chief executives in the country. Recently, his compensation made the news. As a nonprofit entity the NFL publicly discloses the compensation of its officers, and in 2011 Mr. Goodell received a total compensation package worth $29.5M. This consisted of $3.1M in salary, a bonus amount of $25.4M and $4.1M in other compensation and benefits. To the casual observer, this might seem like an outsized compensation package, but that perception might be challenged upon closer scrutiny. Outsized compared to what or whom? At Connell & Partners, a division of Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. (GBS), we carefully analyze executive compensation against executives’ true market for their talent as well as shareholders’ expectations. The following article is how we would have analyzed Mr. Goodell’s compensation had the NFL asked. The Peer Group The basis for much of our analysis is a peer group of companies. This is a best practice that most public companies use to compare compensation as well as relative financial performance. GBS constructs our peer groups based on a client’s General Industry Classification Standard codes, or GICS codes, a process that is similar to the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) method. GICS codes come in 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-digit varieties, increasing in order of granularity. The 2-digit code is the broadest definition of a company’s industry and the 8-digit is the most specific. Once we have the initial pool of comparator firms we refine it by revenue and market capitalization, targeting firms that have financials between 1/2–2x or 1/3–3x of our client’s (the comparator firm). In order to have a sufficient pool of companies to choose from, we expand those financial ranges and/or move toward less granular levels of the GICS code. Above all, we are crafting a market for executive talent with an understanding that some flexibility exists related to industry and company size. We aim to place our client at the median for both revenue and market capitalization, as cash compensation is largely tied to a company’s revenue and the same can be said for equity compensation and market capitalization. For the analysis of Mr. Goodell’s compensation, GBS was presented with the challenge of constructing a peer group for a non-public “company” without publicly disclosed revenues. This meant that not only would we lack a true market capitalization, but we would also have to approximate relative performance. We sourced our NFL revenue data from Plunkett Research, Ltd., a provider of market research, industry statistics, trends and in- depth analysis of top companies. Their estimate of total NFL revenue for the last completed fiscal year is $9.5B. The previous year’s revenue was estimated at $9B.
  • 2. ©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013 Our calculation for market capitalization relied on an annual analysis of NFL franchise values. The analysis has been done by Forbes for several years and provides the franchises’ value, debt percentage, revenue and operating income. We used the sum of the 32 NFL franchise values net their debt, which was $28.7B according to Forbes’ September 2012 analysis. We recognize that each of the franchises is owned independently (or publicly by the citizens of Green Bay in the case of the Packers). However, for the purposes of this analysis, we see each of those individual owners as akin to division managers, responsible for the financial outcome of their own geography but inextricably linked to the fortunes of the other divisions. The owners are also the shareholders and board of directors, responsible for hiring and compensating Mr. Goodell to manage the organization on their behalf. Due to the large size of the NFL, GBS was forced to examine the broadest industry scope available, the 2-digit GICS code for Consumer Discretionary products. We chose this GICS because it includes media, entertainment and other companies that rely heavily on management of their brands. It includes all of the NFL’s broadcast distribution partners (ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox and DIRECTV) and one of its merchandising partners (Nike). If Mr. Goodell ever left the NFL, or the NFL sought a new commissioner from the outside, the chief executives of these firms would surely be on the NFL’s radar. Using the process, GBS built the following executive compensation peer group for the NFL: Notes: Revenue data sources: Companies – S&P Research Insight; NFL – Plunkett Research, Ltd. Market capitalizations as of 3/1/13. No, not every peer group company is a direct product or service competitor. However, each is a large American company with significant brand equity. Company Ticker Location Revenue - FY ($B) Revenue - Last 4Q ($B) Market Capitalization ($B) CBSCorp. CBS NewYork, NY $14.1 $14.1 $27.3 DIRECTV DTV El Segundo, CA $29.7 $29.7 $27.6 Discovery Communications, Inc. DISCA Silver Spring, MD $4.5 $4.5 $17.2 Harley-Davidson, Inc. HOG Milwaukee, WI $5.6 $5.6 $11.9 Las Vegas Sands Corp. LVS Las Vegas, NV $9.4 $11.1 $42.4 Mattel, Inc. MAT El Segundo, CA $6.4 $6.4 $14.0 McDonald's Corp. MCD Oak Brook, IL $27.6 $27.6 $96.2 Netflix, Inc. NFLX Los Gatos, CA $3.6 $3.6 $10.5 Nike, Inc. NKE Beaverton, OR $24.1 $24.7 $39.0 OmnicomGroup OMC NewYork, NY $14.2 $14.2 $15.0 Priceline.com, Inc. PCLN Norwalk, CT $5.3 $5.3 $34.4 Sirius XMRadio, Inc. SIRI NewYork, NY $3.4 $3.4 $20.4 Starbucks Corp. SBUX Seattle, WA $13.3 $13.7 $41.1 TimeWarner Cable, Inc. TWC NewYork, NY $21.4 $21.4 $25.5 Viacom, Inc. VIAB NewYork, NY $13.9 $13.2 $29.1 VirginMedia, Inc. VMED NewYork, NY $6.7 $6.7 $12.5 Walt Disney Co. DIS Burbank, CA $42.3 $42.8 $98.6 WynnResorts Ltd. WYNN Las Vegas, NV $5.2 $5.2 $11.8 Yum! Brands, Inc. YUM Louisville, KY $13.6 $13.6 $29.5 Peer Group25thPercentile $5.4 $5.4 $14.5 Peer Group50thPercentile $13.3 $13.2 $27.3 Peer Group75thPercentile $17.8 $17.8 $36.7 National Football League NFL NewYork, NY $9.5 $9.5 $28.7 Percentile WithinPeer Group 45 42 59 Notes: Source: S&PResearchInsight Market capitalizations as of 3/1/13
  • 3. ©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013 Benchmarking Once the peer group has been established, GBS benchmarks against the appropriate executive matches at the peer group companies. Compensation data for public companies is found in the DEF-14A filing, commonly known as the proxy. We break down compensation into cash, long-term incentive (LTI) and other compensation, and then categorize further from there. Cash compensation is composed of an executive fixed-base salary and any short-term incentive (STI). STI can be a discretionary, non-formulaic bonus or a more quantitative non- equity incentive program (NEIP). We gather both the target values for STI and the actual bonus distributions. LTI compensation is broken down by grants of options, time-based restricted shares and performance-vesting restricted shares. To value the options, GBS used the grant date fair value, usually the Black-Scholes value, disclosed by the company. Time- and performance-vesting shares were valued at the target distribution of shares. Many companies do not make consistent annual LTI grants, and in those cases we “annualize” the LTI value in order to approximate the normalized value that the company intends to deliver to its executives. Other compensation is sort of a catch-all for non-cash delivery of extraordinary benefits and perquisites to executives. These can vary substantially by company and executive within each company. Typical perquisites include supplementary medical exam coverage, use of company vehicles, personal and family security, financial planning and tax preparation, and company contributions to supplemental retirement plans. The following peer group data was gathered to make our assessment of Mr. Goodell’s compensation: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 A B C = (A+B) D E = (A + D) F G H I = (F+G+H) J = (C+I) K = (E+I) L M = (K+L) Total Cash Compensation ($K) Annual Long-Term Incentives ($K) Total Comp. ($K) Base Salary Actual Bonus / STI Actual Total Cash Target Bonus / STI (% Base) Target Total Cash Stock Options Restricted Stock Perf. Awards Total Other Comp. Total Direct + Indirect CBS Corp. President and CEO $3,500 $27,500 $31,000 343% $15,500 $27,317 $4,250 $4,250 $35,817 $66,817 $51,317 $1,605 $68,422 DIRECTV Chairman, President and CEO $1,518 $3,900 $5,418 200% $4,560 $4,166 $0 $4,897 $9,063 $14,480 $13,622 $318 $14,798 Discovery Communications, Inc. President and CEO $2,962 $4,838 $7,799 169% $7,962 $23,873 $0 $20,301 $44,174 $51,974 $52,136 $430 $52,404 Harley-Davidson, Inc. President and CEO $975 $2,803 $3,778 283% $3,738 $1,735 $1,544 $0 $3,279 $7,057 $7,016 $175 $7,232 Las Vegas Sands Corp Chairman of the Board, CEO and Treasurer $1,000 $6,304 $7,304 396% $4,957 $1,825 $1,825 $0 $3,650 $10,954 $8,607 $2,891 $13,845 Mattel, Inc. CEO $1,250 $1,901 $3,151 130% $2,875 $2,297 $2,333 $922 $5,553 $8,704 $8,428 $283 $8,987 McDonald's Corp. Vice Chairman and CEO $1,473 $3,300 $4,773 151% $3,693 $1,797 $0 $1,429 $3,226 $7,999 $6,919 $752 $8,751 Netflix, Inc. CEO, President, Chairman of the Board $500 $0 $500 N/A N/A $8,788 $0 $0 $8,788 $9,288 N/A $1 $9,289 Nike, Inc. President and CEO $1,550 $6,206 $7,756 344% $6,875 $3,648 $7,500 $0 $11,148 $18,904 $18,023 $308 $19,213 Omnicom Group President and CEO $1,000 $9,981 $10,981 840% $9,400 $0 $0 $2,139 $2,139 $13,120 $11,539 $161 $13,282 Priceline.com President and CEO $550 $4,000 $4,550 300% $2,200 $0 $0 $4,500 $4,500 $9,050 $6,700 $8 $9,058 Sirius XM Radio, Inc. CEO $1,500 $9,200 $10,700 N/A N/A $3,521 $0 $0 $3,521 $14,221 N/A $7 $14,228 Starbucks Corp. Chairman, President and CEO $1,483 $2,309 $3,791 152% $3,733 $6,898 $0 $18,000 $24,898 $28,689 $28,631 $221 $28,910 Time Warner Cable, Inc. Chairman and CEO $1,250 $7,211 $8,461 500% $7,500 $2,829 $0 $4,592 $7,422 $15,882 $14,922 $439 $16,322 Viacom, Inc. President and CEO, Director $3,500 $11,500 $15,000 343% $15,500 $6,000 $0 $12,127 $18,127 $33,127 $33,627 $269 $33,396 Virgin Media, Inc. CEO $1,203 $1,131 $2,334 100% $2,407 $1,166 $0 $2,538 $3,704 $6,038 $6,111 $297 $6,336 Walt Disney Co. Chairman and CEO $2,500 $16,520 $19,020 480% $14,500 $7,750 $0 $9,533 $17,283 $36,303 $31,783 $801 $37,103 Wynn Resorts Ltd Chairman and CEO $3,879 $11,063 $14,941 234% $12,941 N/A N/A N/A N/A $14,941 $12,941 $1,533 $16,475 Yum Brands, Inc. Chairman, CEO and President $1,474 $4,541 $6,015 157% $3,794 $5,807 $0 $773 $6,580 $12,595 $10,374 $309 $12,905 Peer Group 25th Percentile $1,102 $3,052 $4,171 157% $3,733 $1,804 $0 $193 $3,663 $9,169 $8,428 $198 $9,173 Peer Group 50th Percentile $1,474 $4,838 $7,304 283% $4,957 $3,585 $0 $2,338 $7,001 $14,221 $12,941 $308 $14,228 Peer Group 75th Percentile $2,025 $9,591 $10,841 344% $9,400 $6,673 $1,158 $4,821 $15,749 $23,797 $28,631 $596 $24,061 National Football League Commissioner $3,117 $22,309 $25,426 $25,426 $4,064 $29,490 Percentile within Peer Group 85 97 97 76 100 78 N/AN/A N/A Actual Total Direct ($K) Target Total Direct ($K) Company Title Notes: DIRECTV (Chairman, President and CEO) – LTI: Represents annualized LTI. Mattel, Inc. (CEO) – TOTAL OWNERSHIP: Represents annualized LTI. Executive retired at the end of the fiscal year. Netflix, Inc. (CEO, President, Chairman of the Board) – BONUS/NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN: Company does not have a cash bonus plan. Nike, Inc. (President and CEO) – LTI: Represents annualized LTI. Executive received a $20M RSU retention grant with a 5-year vest. Sirius XM Radio, Inc. (CEO) – BONUS/NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN: Executive’s bonus is determined by the funding of an executive bonus pool, which is 2.75% of EBITDA. Starbucks Corp. (Chairman, President and CEO) – LTI: Represents annualized LTI. Executive previously received a $35M option retention grant with a 10-year vest. Wynn Resorts Ltd (Chairman and CEO) – LTI: Executive owns 10% of the company and does not participate in the LTI program.
  • 4. ©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013 The data shows that Mr. Goodell is above the 75th percentile for cash compensation, actual total direct compensation and total direct and indirect compensation. Because the NFL cannot offer equity in the company, all of Mr. Goodell’s compensation must be in cash or other benefits. Accordingly, we expect his total cash compensation to far exceed the peer group norms, given that the majority of public company CEO compensation is in the form of LTI. However, his total compensation package still exceeds the 75th percentile of the peer group. In the next section, we examine whether or not this is justified. Pay-for-Performance Assessment Executive compensation does not occur in a vacuum. A company needs to consider not only how the dollar value of CEO compensation compares to the peer group, but how the company performed against those peers. This will give an indication of whether or not a company is truly paying for performance. Proxy advisory services use relative peer group performance as a major input into their recommendations to vote for or against a company’s proxy vote, as and on the non-binding say-on-pay votes. The most common way to measure a company’s performance is total shareholder return (TSR). TSR is the increase in stock price plus any dividend distributions. Because the NFL is not a publically traded entity, GBS had to calculate the TSR for the NFL’s shareholder in a different manner. Here we used the change in the equity value of each team assigned by Forbes, and treated the operating income as shareholder dividends.1 Based on this method the NFL had an annual TSR of 14.0%, approximately the peer group median. The NFL also had revenue growth of 5.6%, the peer group 25th percentile. Note: Compensation and financial metrics are displayed in descending order. Chart is not meant to be read linearly. 1 This method of calculating the NFL’s return was validated by professors Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel of University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business in their paper The Economics of NFL Team Ownership. This report was prepared at the request of the National Football League Players’ Association. Base Salary ($K) Actual Bonus/STI ($K) Actual Total Cash ($K) Actual Total Direct Comp. ($K) Actual Total Direct & Indirect Comp. ($K) 1-Year Total Shrhldr. Return Revenue Growth A National Football League $3,879 S $27,500 B $31,000 B $66,817 B $68,422 B 76.1% R 50.2% F B CBS Corp. $3,500 B $22,309 A $25,426 A $51,974 D $52,404 D 44.5% B 48.2% I C DIRECTV $3,500 P $16,520 R $19,020 R $36,303 R $37,103 R 41.4% P 41.2% L D Discovery Communications, Inc. $3,117 A $11,500 P $15,000 P $33,127 P $33,396 P 37.9% N 25.9% S E Harley-Davidson, Inc. $2,962 D $11,063 S $14,941 S $28,689 N $29,490 A 34.6% H 15.7% J F Las Vegas Sands Corp $2,500 R $9,981 K $10,981 K $25,426 A $28,910 N 30.4% J 13.7% N G Mattel, Inc. $1,550 J $9,200 M $10,700 M $18,904 J $19,213 J 22.7% T 13.0% C H McDonald's Corp. $1,518 C $7,211 O $8,461 O $15,882 O $16,475 S 17.1% L 12.2% D I Netflix, Inc. $1,500 M $6,304 F $7,799 D $14,941 S $16,322 O 14.0% A 12.2% H J Nike, Inc. $1,483 N $6,206 J $7,756 J $14,480 C $14,798 C 13.5% E 11.3% T K Omnicom Group $1,474 T $4,838 D $7,304 F $14,221 M $14,228 M 13.0% G 10.6% K L Priceline.com $1,473 H $4,541 T $6,015 T $13,120 K $13,845 F 12.0% S 9.3% E M Sirius XM Radio, Inc. $1,250 G $4,000 L $5,418 C $12,595 T $13,282 K 11.6% M 7.0% M N Starbucks Corp. $1,250 O $3,900 C $4,773 H $10,954 F $12,905 T 7.1% C 7.0% G O Time Warner Cable, Inc. $1,203 Q $3,300 H $4,550 L $9,288 I $9,289 I -0.4% K 5.6% A P Viacom, Inc. $1,000 F $2,803 E $3,791 N $9,050 L $9,058 L -1.0% O 4.3% O Q Virgin Media, Inc. $1,000 K $2,309 N $3,778 E $8,704 G $8,987 G -1.8% D 4.0% Q R Walt Disney Co. $975 E $1,901 G $3,151 G $7,999 H $8,751 H -7.0% F 3.4% R S Wynn Resorts Ltd $550 L $1,131 Q $2,334 Q $7,057 E $7,232 E -21.0% Q 1.3% B T Yum Brands, Inc. $500 I $0 I $500 I $6,038 Q $6,336 Q -60.6% I -6.9% P 85 97 97 76 78 56 25 Notes: Compensation and financial metrics are displayed in descending order. Chart is not meant to be read linearly. CEO Compensation Percentile within Peer Group Financial Performance Percentile within Peer Group Peer Group Companies
  • 5. ©Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. June 2013 Note: CBS and DISCA (Discovery Communications, Inc.) CEO pay has been displayed lower to allow for greater chart granularity. Overall Assessment It is the opinion of GBS that Mr. Goodell’s compensation is within market norms. We arrived at this conclusion through both an objective and subjective assessment. Mr. Goodell has a unique compensation structure because it is all cash, and his overall compensation package is positioned at approximately the 75th percentile of the peer group in terms of dollar value. However, because he does not have the ability to receive equity grants, this is the extent of value he can realize from his employer’s performance. All the other peer group CEOs have significant equity holdings in their companies and the ability to further gain from LTI compensation. Accordingly, the capital gains they realize from shareholder return is a significant portion of the compensation they receive. Furthermore, cash compensation presents a less favorable tax treatment than time- or performance-vested equity that can be eligible for capital gains treatment as opposed to higher ordinary income rates. As long as the NFL continues its impressive growth and unprecedented popularity, Commissioner Goodell will continue to be one of America’s most highly paid (if not admired) executives. This analysis is not based on an actual client situation, and is meant for informational purposes only. The analysis is in no way intended to be used as a primary basis for benefits, fiduciary, or securities decisions. Similar results are not guaranteed and will vary based upon the individual client situations. You should consult with financial, tax, legal, and accounting advisors before implementing any plan or course of action. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a contract or a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any product. The charts and other data contained in this document are hypothetical and are for illustrative purposes only. The information has been made available to you as self-help tools for your independent use and is not intended to provide investment advice. Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc., its affiliates or representatives cannot and do not guarantee their applicability or accuracy in regards to your individual circumstances. CBS DTV DISCA HOG LVS MAT MCD NFLX NKE OMC PCLN SIRI SBUX TWC VIAB VMED DIS WYNN YUM NFL -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 CEO Total Direct Compensation($K) vs. Total Shareholder Return