This document discusses global warming from multiple perspectives. It first explains how the debate on global warming emerged in the 1980s and has since involved many scientific and social science disciplines. It then summarizes the views of two authors - Robert Strom and Roy Spencer - who have opposing views on global warming. Strom explains the natural cycles of warming and cooling throughout Earth's history but acknowledges that human activity since the Industrial Revolution has likely caused recent temperature increases by emitting greenhouse gases. Spencer argues that climate change hysteria has been fueled by politics and economic motives rather than science. The document concludes that since humans are part of nature, whatever causes the planet to warm can be considered natural, not artificial.

1. v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COM
Global Warming Persuasive Essay Sample
HUMAN ENDEAVOUR: TOO WARM FOR
ITS OWN GOOD
EssayShark.com - Online Academic Assistance

2. v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COM
Since inception of the argument about global warming, which erupted in the scientific and
popular literature during the 1980s, this aspect of environment change has been addressed by
those involved in the geosciences, the biological sciences, astronomy, and environmental
sciences. Other disciplines, such as economics, political science, demographics and
population statistics, medicine, agriculture, and engineering have taken up the debate. A
number of good books discourse about the intricate interactions between these disciplines.
Many authors have attempted to integrate them, and to develop meaningful conclusions and
potentially useful solutions (Strom xii). Here, an effort is made to explore an explanation of
global climate change, examine why it is such a politically-charged issue, and show how it is
humans who are causing the recorded rises in temperature.
In his book Hot House: Global Climate and the Human Condition, Robert Strom (2007)
attempts to explain the broad – or rather, enormous – cycles of cooling and warming that
have enveloped Earth since the beginning. He explains how catastrophic climate change has
always affected the conditions on the planet’s surface and directed the minute or gigantic
changes in environmental factors – and through them, speciation, and other biological
dynamics (Strom 60). This happened even before humans evolved.
Strom goes on to show how mass extinction events have always been caused by sudden or
gradual changes in Earth’s surface temperatures, caused by climactic conditions or
cataclysms such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and other colossal happenings (Strom
59).
Other authors and scientists, such as Roy Spencer in his book Climate Confusion (2010) take
up the opposing view and enumerate how climate change hysteria has gathered pace in the
world, fueled by international politics, international skirmishes over finite resources, and
economic doom-saying by stakeholders with ulterior motives (Spencer 20). This popular
scientist appeals to the layperson and gives easy to understand rationales to refute political,
religious, and philosophical reasons placed behind the global warming argument that
proposes the warming aspect can be blamed on human activity.
Spencer (2010) places abuse of authority, both scientific and political, at the root of all the
fights taken up by opposing factions in the debate. He states that just because the science of
the day, and the politicians in power, make persuasive arguments, it does not necessarily
make those opinions watertight or even true.

3. v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COM
Human activity is to blame for much of the change in temperature experienced in the last
millennium or so, many scientists purport to show (Spencer 52). Emissions from human
endeavor to feed, clothe, and transport people and their goods around the globe have, since
the industrial revolution and the invention of the internal combustion engine – not to mention
the provision of reticulated fuel and power to all human habitations – caused irreparable
damage to the atmosphere. If these emissions were not continually pumped into the
atmosphere, some say, Earth’s temperatures would not experience the rises and fluctuations,
or the freak weather patterns, which seem to plague all regions in recent times (Strom 39).
Geographical studies and astronomy have shown this to be true. Economics reports have also
shown a correlation between human prosperity and success with the warming of the planet
(Strom 93).
Chapter Five of the seminal collection of essays by Peter Newell et al (2012) shows how
emissions and the continued abuse of Earth’s environment is bound to be perpetuated further
than ever in the history of human interaction and activity, through the new carbon dealings
between groups of nations (Newell et al 104). These political transactions are more to do with
the politics of the day than any true concern with the state of the environment bequeathed to
subsequent generations of users and abusers.
This has always been so, and will continue to be the main reason behind the warming
environment. What also remains true, however, is an important concept few consider when
they enter the debate. This can never be an argument on whether the situation is “natural” due
to the constant cycles of the planet that cannot be interfered with, or a “synthetic” reason
wrought by humans (Spencer 111). Since human life is indubitably normal and biological,
one can only argue that whatever humans do, and however the world gets warmer, because
humans are a natural part of Earth and its dynamic existence, and their activity cannot be as
artificial as some might protest, all reasons to do with the planet’s temperatures must be
entirely natural.

4. v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COM
References
Newell, P., Boykoff, M. and Boyd, E.The New Carbon Economy: Constitution, Governance
and Contestation Antipode Books, 2012
Spencer, Roy W. Climate Confusion Encounter Books, 2010
Strom, Robert G. Hot House: Global Climate and the Human Condition Springer, 2007.
.