GINO SA:
DISTRIBUTION
CHANNEL
MANAGEMENT
HARVARD CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
What is
GINO SA ?
GINO SA
• One of the largest burner
manufacturer and exporter in the
world and enjoys up to 14% market
share
• Set-up in France
THE PLAYERS
• David Zhou - China marketing manager
of Gino SA
• Jean Michael Pierre - Asia Pacific Area
Manager
• Henry Gong - Gino’s largest distributor
Jinghua’s general manager
Market
Segmentation
SEGMENTS
• Domestic Boilers
• Commercial Boilers
• Industrial Boilers
Segments Manufacturers Average Price Market Size
Domestic Boilers
and
Water Boilers
310 RMB 2500 per unit RMB 194 million
Commercial
boilers
RMB 9000 RMB 198 million
Industrial Boilers 60 RMB 65000 RMB 221 million
RANGE SYSTEM
• Estimated sizes in unit sold
RANGE MARKET SIZE
Domestic 79,900
Commercial 20,080
Industrial 2,920
Total 102,900
DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
• The distributors:
1. Jinghua (also sold boilers)
2. FUNG’s (textile industry) accounted 90%
of
annual turnover
3. Wayip (sold only GINO burners)
• Revenue split between burners and spare
was 80/20
DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
• Performance Statistics
Jinghua FUNG’s Wayip Total
Domestic 4,354 3,075 3,458 10,887
Commerc
ial
876 433 568 1,877
Industrial 37 48 52 137
Total 5,267 3,556 4,078 12,901
What is
the problem?
THE PROBLEM
• Choosing between an OEM proposal
from Feima and agitating its well-
established distribution channel,
especially Jinghua.
WHO ARE INVOLVED?
• GINO- the main producer
• Jinghua- largest distributor of GINO in
China and accounted 40% of GINO’s
China revenue - the distributor
• FEIMA- potential OEM and major
client of Jinghua - the buyer
AIM
• Grow its annual unit sales by 20%,
industrial sales by 200 units
• Build two OEM & end user channels
by improving service standards
RISK INVOLVED
• Feima’s OEM businesses may lead to
frayed relationship with existing
distributor, Jinghua.
OBJECTIVE
• Choose between pleasing distributor
or setting up OEM.
• If OEM: create a pricing strategy for
potential OEM’s including Feima.
What can be
the advantages?
ADVANTAGES
Why Zhou wants Feima’s OEM business?
• Developing OEM business was one way
to combat increasing power of
distributors
• Good opportunity to break into a well-
entrenched customers in industrial
ADVANTAGES
• Success with Feima would make it easier
for Gino to develop OEM business in
other distributor’s territories
What can be
the disadvantages?
DISADVANTAGES
Why Jinghua was adamantly opposed?
• Jinghua strongly believed that Gino
should not develop distributor’s existing
costumer as OEM
• The practice would set a bad example,
which could destroy their confidence in
SWOT
analysis
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTH
• Global presence, well established
channel network and strong brand
reputation
• Price gap from competition of up to
30%
• Contribution margins (30%- industrial,
25%- commercial, less than 20%-
WEAKNESS
• Reliance on oligopolistic distribution
channel for meeting the sales targets
• Unable to take over industrial burner
market
• Unable to steal major market from
competitors
OPPORTUNITIES
• Increased demand (20% higher in
the next five years) in industrial
range.
THREATS
• Political influence of local
manufacturers leading to increased
output and selling power
• Declining growth in western markets
What can
be done?
ALTERNATIVES (1/3)
1. Reject Feima’s offer
ADVANTAGES
• Strengthening of ties between
manufacturer and distributors
• Maintain its leadership position in
Domestic Segment
DISADVANTAGES
• Revenue lost from potential new orders
• Conflict with strategy of adding more
OEM accounts
• Opportunity cost in high margin Industrial
Segment
• Increase in distribution power
ALTERNATIVES (2/3)
2. Accept Feima’s offer for industrial
segment and leave other segments
to Jinghua
ADVANTAGES
• Increase in revenue and profits with
penetration into industrial segment
• Completely in line with management
strategy goals
• Jinghua also making more revenue and
profit
• Warehouse will solve inventory problems
DISADVANTAGES
• Getting distributors on their side can be
a tough task despite more profits
ALTERNATIVES (3/3)
3. Offer the discounts to Feima through
Jinghua
ADVANTAGES
• Good relationship with Jinghua and
other distributors
• Continuation of the existing relation with
Feima
DISADVANTAGES
• Alternative not aligned to Gino’s
strategy
• Can impact the overall margin of the
industry
• Other distributor’s OEM accounts will ask
for same margin
Financial analysis
of alternatives
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR
ALTERNATIVE 1
Domestic Commercial Industrial Total
Units sold by a distributor 10887 1877 137 12901
Transfer Price (RMB) 2500 9000 65000
Revenue from burners
(RMB)
27217500 16893000 8905000 53015500
Revenue from spares in
USD (80/20) split
6804375 4223250 2226250 13253875
Net revenue of Gino in
RMB
34021875 21116250 11131250 66269375
Net revenue of Gino in
USD
4099021 2544126 1341114 2984262
Total Contribution Margin $819804 $508825 $268222 $1596852
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR
ALTERNATIVE 2
On the next page
Domestic Commerci
al
Industrial Industrial
Direct
Total
Forecasted Units 11810 2003 165 36 13978
Transfer Price (RMB) 2500 9000 65000 120575
Revenue from burners
(RMB)
29525000 18627000 10725000 4340700 62617700
Revenue from spares in USD
(80/20) split
7381250 4506750 2681250 1085175 15654425
Net revenue of Gino in RMB 36906250 22533750 13406250 5425875 782772125
Net revenue of Gino in USD 4446536 2714909 1615210 653719 9430376
Total Contribution Margin
(20%, 25%, 30%, 30%)
$889307 $678727 $484563 $196115 $2248713
Setting up
warehouse(30000*12/8.3)
$43373
Shipping, Insurance etc.
(48.4% of Cm)
$94920
Outsourcing cost (5% of
CM)
$14096
Net contribution $889307 $678727 $484563 $43725 $2096323
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR
ALTERNATIVE 3
Domestic Commercial Industrial Total
Forecasted Units 11810 2003 198 13978
Transfer Price (RMB) 2500 9000 65000
Revenue from burners
(RMB)
29525000 18627000 12870000 60422000
Revenue from spares in
USD (80/20) split
7381250 4506750 3217500 15105500
Net revenue of Gino in
RMB
36906250 22533750 16087500 75527500
Net revenue of Gino in
USD
4446536 2714909 1938253 9099698
Total Contribution Margin $444653 $407236 $387650 $1239540
FORECASTING NUMBER OF UNITS
Current Industry
Growth
(2%, 5%,
20%)
Addition
in Feima
sales
Projecte
d sales
2000
Projecte
d sales
2001
Projecte
d sales
2002
Domesti
c
10887 11105 705 11810 12047 12288
Commer
cial
1817 1971 32 2003 2104 2210
Industrial 137 165 33 198 238 286
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
Resolve
Jinghua’s
problem
(0.35)
Revenue
and profit
(0.3)
Industrial
Segment
penetratio
n (0.25)
Bargaining
of
distributors
(0.10)
Total
Alternative
1
1 1 2 1 1.25
Alternative
2
3 3 3 2 2.9
Alternative
3
2 2 1 3 1.85
Recommendation
of strategy
RECOMMENDATION
• From financial analysis & pros and cons
of all Alternative 2 is recommended
• It is aligned with Gino’s long term
strategy and achieve the target of 200
Industrial burners.
RECOMMENDATION
• The warehouse will house Industrial
burner inventory which will reduce
inventory cycle time for other distributors
giving Gino a competitive edge.
Contingency
Planning
IMPLEMENTATION
• Feima would be happy about the deal
as it is getting the percentage discount it
demanded
• If Jinghua does not agree to the plan
due to fear of losing the industrial market
a contract may be signed stating that
Gino will not acquire any industry burner
IMPLEMENTATION
• If Other OEMs ask for the same margin
then the discount must be compensated
by increase in purchase
Presentation created by-
ROHIT, NSIT Delhi
During an internship by-
Prof. Sameer Mathur, IIM
Lucknow
www.IIMInternship.com

GINO SA: CHANNEL DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    GINO SA • Oneof the largest burner manufacturer and exporter in the world and enjoys up to 14% market share • Set-up in France
  • 4.
    THE PLAYERS • DavidZhou - China marketing manager of Gino SA • Jean Michael Pierre - Asia Pacific Area Manager • Henry Gong - Gino’s largest distributor Jinghua’s general manager
  • 5.
  • 6.
    SEGMENTS • Domestic Boilers •Commercial Boilers • Industrial Boilers Segments Manufacturers Average Price Market Size Domestic Boilers and Water Boilers 310 RMB 2500 per unit RMB 194 million Commercial boilers RMB 9000 RMB 198 million Industrial Boilers 60 RMB 65000 RMB 221 million
  • 7.
    RANGE SYSTEM • Estimatedsizes in unit sold RANGE MARKET SIZE Domestic 79,900 Commercial 20,080 Industrial 2,920 Total 102,900
  • 8.
    DISTRIBUTION NETWORK • Thedistributors: 1. Jinghua (also sold boilers) 2. FUNG’s (textile industry) accounted 90% of annual turnover 3. Wayip (sold only GINO burners) • Revenue split between burners and spare was 80/20
  • 9.
    DISTRIBUTION NETWORK • PerformanceStatistics Jinghua FUNG’s Wayip Total Domestic 4,354 3,075 3,458 10,887 Commerc ial 876 433 568 1,877 Industrial 37 48 52 137 Total 5,267 3,556 4,078 12,901
  • 10.
  • 11.
    THE PROBLEM • Choosingbetween an OEM proposal from Feima and agitating its well- established distribution channel, especially Jinghua.
  • 12.
    WHO ARE INVOLVED? •GINO- the main producer • Jinghua- largest distributor of GINO in China and accounted 40% of GINO’s China revenue - the distributor • FEIMA- potential OEM and major client of Jinghua - the buyer
  • 13.
    AIM • Grow itsannual unit sales by 20%, industrial sales by 200 units • Build two OEM & end user channels by improving service standards
  • 14.
    RISK INVOLVED • Feima’sOEM businesses may lead to frayed relationship with existing distributor, Jinghua.
  • 15.
    OBJECTIVE • Choose betweenpleasing distributor or setting up OEM. • If OEM: create a pricing strategy for potential OEM’s including Feima.
  • 16.
    What can be theadvantages?
  • 17.
    ADVANTAGES Why Zhou wantsFeima’s OEM business? • Developing OEM business was one way to combat increasing power of distributors • Good opportunity to break into a well- entrenched customers in industrial
  • 18.
    ADVANTAGES • Success withFeima would make it easier for Gino to develop OEM business in other distributor’s territories
  • 19.
    What can be thedisadvantages?
  • 20.
    DISADVANTAGES Why Jinghua wasadamantly opposed? • Jinghua strongly believed that Gino should not develop distributor’s existing costumer as OEM • The practice would set a bad example, which could destroy their confidence in
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    STRENGTH • Global presence,well established channel network and strong brand reputation • Price gap from competition of up to 30% • Contribution margins (30%- industrial, 25%- commercial, less than 20%-
  • 24.
    WEAKNESS • Reliance onoligopolistic distribution channel for meeting the sales targets • Unable to take over industrial burner market • Unable to steal major market from competitors
  • 25.
    OPPORTUNITIES • Increased demand(20% higher in the next five years) in industrial range.
  • 26.
    THREATS • Political influenceof local manufacturers leading to increased output and selling power • Declining growth in western markets
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    ADVANTAGES • Strengthening ofties between manufacturer and distributors • Maintain its leadership position in Domestic Segment
  • 30.
    DISADVANTAGES • Revenue lostfrom potential new orders • Conflict with strategy of adding more OEM accounts • Opportunity cost in high margin Industrial Segment • Increase in distribution power
  • 31.
    ALTERNATIVES (2/3) 2. AcceptFeima’s offer for industrial segment and leave other segments to Jinghua
  • 32.
    ADVANTAGES • Increase inrevenue and profits with penetration into industrial segment • Completely in line with management strategy goals • Jinghua also making more revenue and profit • Warehouse will solve inventory problems
  • 33.
    DISADVANTAGES • Getting distributorson their side can be a tough task despite more profits
  • 34.
    ALTERNATIVES (3/3) 3. Offerthe discounts to Feima through Jinghua
  • 35.
    ADVANTAGES • Good relationshipwith Jinghua and other distributors • Continuation of the existing relation with Feima
  • 36.
    DISADVANTAGES • Alternative notaligned to Gino’s strategy • Can impact the overall margin of the industry • Other distributor’s OEM accounts will ask for same margin
  • 37.
  • 38.
    FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR ALTERNATIVE1 Domestic Commercial Industrial Total Units sold by a distributor 10887 1877 137 12901 Transfer Price (RMB) 2500 9000 65000 Revenue from burners (RMB) 27217500 16893000 8905000 53015500 Revenue from spares in USD (80/20) split 6804375 4223250 2226250 13253875 Net revenue of Gino in RMB 34021875 21116250 11131250 66269375 Net revenue of Gino in USD 4099021 2544126 1341114 2984262 Total Contribution Margin $819804 $508825 $268222 $1596852
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Domestic Commerci al Industrial Industrial Direct Total ForecastedUnits 11810 2003 165 36 13978 Transfer Price (RMB) 2500 9000 65000 120575 Revenue from burners (RMB) 29525000 18627000 10725000 4340700 62617700 Revenue from spares in USD (80/20) split 7381250 4506750 2681250 1085175 15654425 Net revenue of Gino in RMB 36906250 22533750 13406250 5425875 782772125 Net revenue of Gino in USD 4446536 2714909 1615210 653719 9430376 Total Contribution Margin (20%, 25%, 30%, 30%) $889307 $678727 $484563 $196115 $2248713 Setting up warehouse(30000*12/8.3) $43373 Shipping, Insurance etc. (48.4% of Cm) $94920 Outsourcing cost (5% of CM) $14096 Net contribution $889307 $678727 $484563 $43725 $2096323
  • 41.
    FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR ALTERNATIVE3 Domestic Commercial Industrial Total Forecasted Units 11810 2003 198 13978 Transfer Price (RMB) 2500 9000 65000 Revenue from burners (RMB) 29525000 18627000 12870000 60422000 Revenue from spares in USD (80/20) split 7381250 4506750 3217500 15105500 Net revenue of Gino in RMB 36906250 22533750 16087500 75527500 Net revenue of Gino in USD 4446536 2714909 1938253 9099698 Total Contribution Margin $444653 $407236 $387650 $1239540
  • 42.
    FORECASTING NUMBER OFUNITS Current Industry Growth (2%, 5%, 20%) Addition in Feima sales Projecte d sales 2000 Projecte d sales 2001 Projecte d sales 2002 Domesti c 10887 11105 705 11810 12047 12288 Commer cial 1817 1971 32 2003 2104 2210 Industrial 137 165 33 198 238 286
  • 43.
    EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Resolve Jinghua’s problem (0.35) Revenue andprofit (0.3) Industrial Segment penetratio n (0.25) Bargaining of distributors (0.10) Total Alternative 1 1 1 2 1 1.25 Alternative 2 3 3 3 2 2.9 Alternative 3 2 2 1 3 1.85
  • 44.
  • 45.
    RECOMMENDATION • From financialanalysis & pros and cons of all Alternative 2 is recommended • It is aligned with Gino’s long term strategy and achieve the target of 200 Industrial burners.
  • 46.
    RECOMMENDATION • The warehousewill house Industrial burner inventory which will reduce inventory cycle time for other distributors giving Gino a competitive edge.
  • 47.
  • 48.
    IMPLEMENTATION • Feima wouldbe happy about the deal as it is getting the percentage discount it demanded • If Jinghua does not agree to the plan due to fear of losing the industrial market a contract may be signed stating that Gino will not acquire any industry burner
  • 49.
    IMPLEMENTATION • If OtherOEMs ask for the same margin then the discount must be compensated by increase in purchase
  • 51.
    Presentation created by- ROHIT,NSIT Delhi During an internship by- Prof. Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow www.IIMInternship.com