This paper studies the impact of mobile learning implementation efforts in Estonian school system – a process that has created a lot of controversy during the recent years. Best practices in mobile learning are available from the entire world, forcing schools to keep up the push towards better connectivity and gadgetry. Even in the best cases where the schools are provided with the necessary tools, the process has met a lot of scepticism from teachers who are afraid to implement new methods. Teachers are often cornered with the ‘comply or leave’ attitude from educational authorities, resulting in a multi-sided battle between involved parties.
We have surveyed students, teachers, parents and management at five Estonian front-runner schools to sort out the situation. The results show different attitudes among students, school leaders and staff – while all of them mostly possess necessary tools and skills, teachers almost completely lack motivation to promote mobile learning. We propose some positive and negative scenarios – for example, we predict major problems if teacher training will not change, e-safety policies are inadequately developed or authorities will continue the tendency to put all the eggs into one basket (e.g. by relying solely on closed, corporate solutions for mobile learning platforms).
GGULIVRR: Touching Mobile and Contextual LearningeLearning Papers
The quest of today’s learning communities is to creatively uptake and embed the emerging technologies to maintain the pace of change, of learning content and platforms, while satisfying learners’ needs and coping with limited resources. As information is delivered abundantly and change is constant, education focuses on driving 21st century fluency.
Project GGULIVRR, Generic Game for Ubiquitous Learning in Interactive Virtual and Real Realities, initiates the study of ubiquitous learning, investigating mobile and contextual learning, challenging small devices with sophisticated computing and networking capacities, testing the pervasive internet and exploring intelligent tags.
The goal of project GGULIVRR is to present learning communities a framework enabling learners to practice and enhance 21st century skills while generating and playing mobile contextual games.
Project GGULIVRR entices learners to get in touch. To play the contextual game one needs to physically go to a ‘touchable’ location, where real objects are tagged with an intelligent tag. By touching a tag one gets in touch with the contextual content. Through playing and developing GGULIVRR games one meets other gamers and developers as the project format induces interdisciplinarity, inter-social and intercultural communication and collaboration empowering local people to unlock contextual content with a minimal technical threshold.
Reaching Out with OER: The New Role of Public-Facing Open ScholareLearning Papers
Open educational resources (OER) and, more recently, open educational practices (OEP) have been widely promoted as a means of increasing openness in higher education (HE). Thus far, such openness has been limited by OER provision typically being supplier-driven and contained within the boundaries of HE. Seeking to explore ways in which OEP might become more needs-led we conceptualised a new ‘public-facing open scholar’ role involving academics working with online communities to source and develop OER to meet their needs.
To explore the scope for this role we focused on the voluntary sector, which we felt might particularly benefit from such collaboration. We evaluated four representative communities for evidence of their being self-educating (thereby offering the potential for academics to contribute) and for any existing learning dimension. We found that all four communities were self-educating and each included learning infrastructure elements, for example provision for web chats with ‘experts’, together with evidence of receptiveness to academic collaboration. This indicated that there was scope for the role of public-facing open scholar. We therefore developed detailed guidelines for performing the role, which has the potential to be applied beyond the voluntary sector and to greatly extend the beneficial impact of existing OER, prompting institutions to release new OER in response to the needs of people outside HE.
M-portfolios: Using Mobile Technology to Document Learning in Student Teacher...eLearning Papers
We briefly analyse the enhancement of eportfolio processes defined by Zubizarreta (2009) with the introduction of mobile technology. We give some examples of appropriation of mobile device usage in eportfolio processes carried out by student teachers. These examples become the evidence of the enhancement possibilities of one of the portfolio processes defined by Zubizarreta (2009), that of documentation.
Designing and Developing Mobile Learning Applications in International Studen...eLearning Papers
This paper reports on an international collaboration in which students from different universities designed and developed mobile learning applications, working together in interdisciplinary teams using social and mobile media. We describe the concept, process and outcomes of this collaboration including challenges of designing and developing mobile learning applications in virtual teams.
This paper reports on the current challenges the professional sector faces when going mobile. The report discusses the role of mobile devices in the workforce and addresses challenges like compatibility, security and training. It also provides a comprehensive review of the mobile landscape, and reviews current best practices in mobile learning.
OER in the Mobile Era: Content Repositories’ Features for Mobile Devices and ...eLearning Papers
Learning objects and open contents have been named in the Horizon reports from 2004 and 2010 respectively, predicting to have an impact in the short term due to the current trend of offering open content for free on the Web. OER repositories should adapt their features so their contents can be accessed from mobile devices. This paper summarizes recent trends in the creation, publication, discovery, acquisition, access, use and re-use of learning objects on mobile devices based on a literature review on research done from 2007 to 2012. From the content providers side, we present the results obtained from a survey performed on 23 educational repository owners prompting them to answer about their current and expected support on mobile devices. From the content user side, we identify features provided by the main OER repositories. Finally, we introduce future trends and our next contributions.
GGULIVRR: Touching Mobile and Contextual LearningeLearning Papers
The quest of today’s learning communities is to creatively uptake and embed the emerging technologies to maintain the pace of change, of learning content and platforms, while satisfying learners’ needs and coping with limited resources. As information is delivered abundantly and change is constant, education focuses on driving 21st century fluency.
Project GGULIVRR, Generic Game for Ubiquitous Learning in Interactive Virtual and Real Realities, initiates the study of ubiquitous learning, investigating mobile and contextual learning, challenging small devices with sophisticated computing and networking capacities, testing the pervasive internet and exploring intelligent tags.
The goal of project GGULIVRR is to present learning communities a framework enabling learners to practice and enhance 21st century skills while generating and playing mobile contextual games.
Project GGULIVRR entices learners to get in touch. To play the contextual game one needs to physically go to a ‘touchable’ location, where real objects are tagged with an intelligent tag. By touching a tag one gets in touch with the contextual content. Through playing and developing GGULIVRR games one meets other gamers and developers as the project format induces interdisciplinarity, inter-social and intercultural communication and collaboration empowering local people to unlock contextual content with a minimal technical threshold.
Reaching Out with OER: The New Role of Public-Facing Open ScholareLearning Papers
Open educational resources (OER) and, more recently, open educational practices (OEP) have been widely promoted as a means of increasing openness in higher education (HE). Thus far, such openness has been limited by OER provision typically being supplier-driven and contained within the boundaries of HE. Seeking to explore ways in which OEP might become more needs-led we conceptualised a new ‘public-facing open scholar’ role involving academics working with online communities to source and develop OER to meet their needs.
To explore the scope for this role we focused on the voluntary sector, which we felt might particularly benefit from such collaboration. We evaluated four representative communities for evidence of their being self-educating (thereby offering the potential for academics to contribute) and for any existing learning dimension. We found that all four communities were self-educating and each included learning infrastructure elements, for example provision for web chats with ‘experts’, together with evidence of receptiveness to academic collaboration. This indicated that there was scope for the role of public-facing open scholar. We therefore developed detailed guidelines for performing the role, which has the potential to be applied beyond the voluntary sector and to greatly extend the beneficial impact of existing OER, prompting institutions to release new OER in response to the needs of people outside HE.
M-portfolios: Using Mobile Technology to Document Learning in Student Teacher...eLearning Papers
We briefly analyse the enhancement of eportfolio processes defined by Zubizarreta (2009) with the introduction of mobile technology. We give some examples of appropriation of mobile device usage in eportfolio processes carried out by student teachers. These examples become the evidence of the enhancement possibilities of one of the portfolio processes defined by Zubizarreta (2009), that of documentation.
Designing and Developing Mobile Learning Applications in International Studen...eLearning Papers
This paper reports on an international collaboration in which students from different universities designed and developed mobile learning applications, working together in interdisciplinary teams using social and mobile media. We describe the concept, process and outcomes of this collaboration including challenges of designing and developing mobile learning applications in virtual teams.
This paper reports on the current challenges the professional sector faces when going mobile. The report discusses the role of mobile devices in the workforce and addresses challenges like compatibility, security and training. It also provides a comprehensive review of the mobile landscape, and reviews current best practices in mobile learning.
OER in the Mobile Era: Content Repositories’ Features for Mobile Devices and ...eLearning Papers
Learning objects and open contents have been named in the Horizon reports from 2004 and 2010 respectively, predicting to have an impact in the short term due to the current trend of offering open content for free on the Web. OER repositories should adapt their features so their contents can be accessed from mobile devices. This paper summarizes recent trends in the creation, publication, discovery, acquisition, access, use and re-use of learning objects on mobile devices based on a literature review on research done from 2007 to 2012. From the content providers side, we present the results obtained from a survey performed on 23 educational repository owners prompting them to answer about their current and expected support on mobile devices. From the content user side, we identify features provided by the main OER repositories. Finally, we introduce future trends and our next contributions.
Mummies, War Zones, and Pompeii: the use of tablet computers in situated and ...tbirdcymru
I presented this at the ALT-C Conference in Manchester, UK, on 12 September 2012. The work is now being evaluated in the Places project http://www.le.ac.uk/places-mlearn
CHALLENGES OF INSECURITY IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY BASED L...Shehu Abdullahi Ringim
There is general insecurity in the contemporary learning environment particularly at secondary education level. Such insecurity could be posed by distractions to learning as a result of peer pressure, poor program design in the schools and lack of appropriate provision and utilization of learning resources such as the ICT tools. Students of secondary schools are within the age bracket of 14-18 years, which fairly corresponds with the teenage or adolescence stage. Due to limited life experience of this age group, they trend to misuse the ICT infrastructure put in place to support their learning in school or even at home. Therefore, care has to be exercised to protect learners from dangerous and harmful effects of such ICT tools as internet which facilitates access to dangerous websites that render them vulnerable to insecurities and distractions. This paper discussed the available ICT tools in Nigerian secondary schools, the need to guide the students in proper utilization of such tools so that they do not fall victims of the insecurity posed by negative influence of the ICT tools. The paper recommended some strategies to be applied by teachers, administrators, policy makers, and care givers in protecting the learners from such dangers.
ASSESSMENT ON LSPU-SPCC STUDENTS’ READINESS TOWARDS M-LEARNING IJMIT JOURNAL
Today, the use of technology is a powerful advantage in every field in the society. With the advent of
development in information and communications technology (ICT), the process of learning and acquiring
new knowledge had undergone a shift marked by a transition from desktop computing to the widespread
use of mobile technology. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Commission on Higher Education said
that colleges and universities following the new school calendar will no longer require students to attend
face-to-face classes. One of the state universities that had been affected by this inevitable situation is the
Laguna State Polytechnic University. This study aims to determine the readiness of the students in shifting
to m-learning. Specifically, it aims to determine the availability of mobile devices, equipment readiness,
technological skills readiness and psychological readiness. A survey-based methodology was used to
obtain the data and descriptive statistics to analyze the results. It was determined that almost all of the
students own mobile devices, are fully equipped with applications, have high technological skills and are
quite ready in terms of psychological readiness.
Toys to Tools: Connecting Student Cell Phones to Education
Liz Kolb
http://joaojosefonseca1.blogspot.com/
Joao Jose Saraiva da Fonseca
Educacao a distancia
E-Learning in the university: When will it really happen?eLearning Papers
eLearning has enormous potential in education, and there is an urgent need to take stock of the possibilities that it offers. Despite this urgency, research on eLearning is still in a nascent stage and there is a degree of conceptual confusion in the field that is difficult to tolerate.
Authors: Ann-Louise Davidson, David Waddington,
Mummies, War Zones, and Pompeii: the use of tablet computers in situated and ...tbirdcymru
I presented this at the ALT-C Conference in Manchester, UK, on 12 September 2012. The work is now being evaluated in the Places project http://www.le.ac.uk/places-mlearn
CHALLENGES OF INSECURITY IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY BASED L...Shehu Abdullahi Ringim
There is general insecurity in the contemporary learning environment particularly at secondary education level. Such insecurity could be posed by distractions to learning as a result of peer pressure, poor program design in the schools and lack of appropriate provision and utilization of learning resources such as the ICT tools. Students of secondary schools are within the age bracket of 14-18 years, which fairly corresponds with the teenage or adolescence stage. Due to limited life experience of this age group, they trend to misuse the ICT infrastructure put in place to support their learning in school or even at home. Therefore, care has to be exercised to protect learners from dangerous and harmful effects of such ICT tools as internet which facilitates access to dangerous websites that render them vulnerable to insecurities and distractions. This paper discussed the available ICT tools in Nigerian secondary schools, the need to guide the students in proper utilization of such tools so that they do not fall victims of the insecurity posed by negative influence of the ICT tools. The paper recommended some strategies to be applied by teachers, administrators, policy makers, and care givers in protecting the learners from such dangers.
ASSESSMENT ON LSPU-SPCC STUDENTS’ READINESS TOWARDS M-LEARNING IJMIT JOURNAL
Today, the use of technology is a powerful advantage in every field in the society. With the advent of
development in information and communications technology (ICT), the process of learning and acquiring
new knowledge had undergone a shift marked by a transition from desktop computing to the widespread
use of mobile technology. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Commission on Higher Education said
that colleges and universities following the new school calendar will no longer require students to attend
face-to-face classes. One of the state universities that had been affected by this inevitable situation is the
Laguna State Polytechnic University. This study aims to determine the readiness of the students in shifting
to m-learning. Specifically, it aims to determine the availability of mobile devices, equipment readiness,
technological skills readiness and psychological readiness. A survey-based methodology was used to
obtain the data and descriptive statistics to analyze the results. It was determined that almost all of the
students own mobile devices, are fully equipped with applications, have high technological skills and are
quite ready in terms of psychological readiness.
Toys to Tools: Connecting Student Cell Phones to Education
Liz Kolb
http://joaojosefonseca1.blogspot.com/
Joao Jose Saraiva da Fonseca
Educacao a distancia
E-Learning in the university: When will it really happen?eLearning Papers
eLearning has enormous potential in education, and there is an urgent need to take stock of the possibilities that it offers. Despite this urgency, research on eLearning is still in a nascent stage and there is a degree of conceptual confusion in the field that is difficult to tolerate.
Authors: Ann-Louise Davidson, David Waddington,
SAMPLE GED 501 RESEARCH PAPERTechnology Based Education How.docxagnesdcarey33086
SAMPLE GED 501 RESEARCH PAPER
Technology Based Education: How can theories of learning and/or development be used to guide the use of technology in schools?
Introduction
Twenty first century learning environment is no longer a goal, but an educational reality. We are deep into the midst of a paradigm shift that spans across our entire globe. The technology we live with as a society has exponentially grown at an increasingly rapid rate. This is illustrated from the integration of computers in every facet of our lives. This includes televisions, phones, cars, and even coffee makers which all contain a microprocessor, they all think. Even more startling is how connected we all are. Access to information is available at a finger’s touch. We can connect to people, we can shop, and ask for directions from anywhere at any time. We are tethered to the world by social media such as Facebook. Google has mapped out the entire earth. We can send a text message from the middle of Antarctica. Even more startling is how corporations and the government collects data as they track our ever movement as we go online. All this is reflected upon education, which mirrors this new 21st century society. No longer is the classroom isolated from the world, but it too is connected. Learning technology is critical more than ever because it impacts skills and productivity (Hall, 2011) for both the student and the teacher.
Background
Incorporating technology into the classroom has been around since computers were invented, but it has been only recently been the norm in the last few years. This revolution no more pointedly reflected in our education system, than it is today. Johri (2011) states that although digital information technologies in education has become commonplace, there are few guiding frameworks or theories that explains the relationship between technology and learning practices. Bennett and Oliver (2011) share that view. Research has focused on practical implementation versus the theory and application of the technology. They explained once theories are developed, a better understanding of effective technology based pedagogy would occur.
Technology in Education
I believe however, all the theorists play well with technology. Technology is merely a tool. Its strength is the ability to facilitate. John Dewey is a prime example. He believed in “learning by doing”. With an iPad there is an App where by students are able to see the stars and the constellation. With the use of satellites and GPS held within the piece of technology, students are able to view exact locations of stars. Where the iPad is directed in the sky, the stars would be in that location on the handheld screen, no telescope necessary. The students interact with the material to gain knowledge.
This is further illustrated by this second example. The best way to learn about Mayan pyramids is to actually visit one in Central America. With the use of laptops, students can connect to the Discove.
This study explored the main barriers to effective integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Harare Secondary School Education. Data were collected using close ended questionnaires. Participatory research was also carried out to familiarize with the changes happening in secondary schools with respect to integration of ICT in education and to find out the challenges being faced. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS). The results showed that although teachers are aware of the benefits of using ICTs in education there was still limited use of this pedagogy in classrooms as teachers were facing a number of challenges which acted as barriers to the successful implementation of ICT in education. These include lack of a clear sense of direction on how to use ICT to enhance the learning of students, inadequate resources and support as well as lack of the required technological skills among the teachers. The study recommends that effective planning to counter these barriers before implementation would greatly increase the effectiveness of ICT integration in secondary schools.
Paper on sub-theme: “E-Learning” of " International Conference on Open Source...Djadja Sardjana
E-learning or electronic learning is now increasingly recognized as one way to overcome the problem of education, both in the developed countries and in developing countries. Many people use the term different with e-learning, but in principle e-learning is learning to use electronic services as a means of help. The main vehicle in the development of human resources is education and training. But when watching the situation geography, socio-economic and cultural diversity of Indonesia, it is clear that it was not adequate anymore when only relying on the ways of traditional solutions alone.
Lessons Learned from the Safer Internet Program in EstoniaeLearning Papers
Authors: Birgy Lorenz, Kaido Kikkas
Estonian children are a demographic that appear in the Top 5, in the EU, as Internet users who both take advantage of new ICT solutions as well as become susceptible to their downsides (various online threats). In this country, coordinated efforts in raising e-safety awareness are relatively recent. Earlier activities were poorly coordinated, lacked continuity and relied mostly on volunteers. During the last few years, the Safer Internet Program in Estonia has added a much-needed coordinating approach.
How Do Students Use Their Mobile Devices to Support Learning? A Case Study fr...Helen Farley
Though universities are eager to leverage the potential of mobile learning to provide learning flexibly, most balk at the cost of providing students with mobile hardware. The practice of ‘bring your own device’ (BYOD) is often mooted as a cost-effective alternative. This paper provides a snapshot of student ownership of mobile devices at a regional Australian university. Our research shows that students do have access to and use a wide range of devices. However, the delivery of learning is challenged when students try to access materials and activities using these devices. Course materials are rarely optimised for use on smartphones, navigating websites and learning management systems becomes a scrolling nightmare, and interacting with other students is often impractical using prescribed systems. Most concerning is that none of the students surveyed were participating in educator-led mobile learning initiatives. The paper concludes with the proposal of some practical, low-cost tactics that educators could potentially employ to begin engaging with mobile learning, leveraging what students already do.
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. It is an online as well as print version open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as: civil, mechanical, chemical, electronic and computer engineering as well as production and information technology. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published by rapid process within 20 days after acceptance and peer review process takes only 7 days. All articles published in Research Inventy will be peer-reviewed.
Project Copernicus describes an initiative which allows and encourages students to bring their own technology to class, while teachers create lessons which encourages
Similar to Standing at the Crossroads: Mobile Learning and Cloud Computing at Estonian Schools (20)
Managing Training Concepts in Multicultural Business EnvironmentseLearning Papers
Companies that need training and development services increasingly often operate in a context that consists of more than just one country, language and culture. While business operations are becoming international, companies expect their service providers being capable of catering them where needed. Succeeding in a very complex multinational customer-tailored training project takes more than a good concept. The concept must be flexible so that when language and cultural changes vary from country to country they do not endanger the content to be delivered. There can be several localised versions of the training concept under simultaneous delivery. Challenge is how to manage the concept.
Reflective Learning at Work – MIRROR Model, Apps and Serious GameseLearning Papers
This report discusses the initial results of a 4-year FP7 research project that developed a theoretical model and worked on the creation and evaluation of a range of ‘Mirror’ apps based on our Mirror reflection model. The findings divulge how the apps and serious games can facilitate reflectionº at work, by empowering employees to learn by reflection on their work practice and on their personal learning experiences.
SKILL2E: Online Reflection for Intercultural Competence GaineLearning Papers
The project SKILL2E aims to equip students on international work placements with intercultural competences. The model proposes a double loop learning cycle in which a shared online diary using guided questions is used for reflection. Preliminary results illustrate how this collaborative approach is conducive to the development of intercultural competences.
Experience Networking in the TVET System to Improve Occupational CompetencieseLearning Papers
This paper aims at considering the development and strengthening of networks in (T)VET systems as a means of improving employability and mobility of workers, through a system where occupational competences, required by the Labour Market, described in terms of Learning Outcomes that can be assessed and validated in all different contexts (formal, non formal and informal) developed following quality standards, will be abreast with changes and innovations of the global context requirements, in order to respond to those shortcomings that limit the potential growth of countries with serious implications for the participation in global markets, job growth, economical and social stability.
Leveraging Trust to Support Online Learning Creativity – A Case StudyeLearning Papers
The insights shared through this article build on data collected in real life situations. The work described here attempts to understand how trust can be used as leverage to support online learning and creative collaboration. This report explores this understanding from the teacher perspective. It examines trust commitments in an international setting within which learners from different European countries collaborate and articulate their learning tasks and skills at a distance. This research endeavour aims to recognize both individual and group vulnerabilities as opportunities to strengthen their cooperation and collaboration. We believe that by understanding how to assess and monitor learners’ trust, teachers could use this information to intervene and provide positive support, thereby promoting and reinforcing learners’ autonomy and their motivation to creatively engage in their learning activities.
The results gathered so far enabled an initial understanding of what to look for when monitoring trust with the intention of understanding and influencing learners’ behaviours. They point to three main aspects to monitor on students: (1) their perception of each others’ intentions, in a given context, (2) their level of cooperation as expressed by changes in individual and group commitments towards a particular activity; and, (3) their attitudes towards the use of communication mediums for learning purposes (intentions of use, actual use and reactions to actual use).
Innovating Teaching and Learning Practices: Key Elements for Developing Crea...eLearning Papers
This paper looks at how to innovate teaching and learning practices at system level. It describes the vision for ‘Creative Classrooms’ and makes a consolidated proposal for their implementation, clarifying their holistic and systemic nature, their intended learning outcomes, and their pedagogical, technological, and organisational dimensions for innovation. ‘Creative Classrooms’ (CCR) are conceptualized as innovative learning environments that fully embed the potential of ICT to innovate learning and teaching practices in formal, non-formal and informal settings.
The proposed multi-dimensional concept for CCR consists of eight encompassing and interconnected key dimensions and a set of 28 reference parameters (‘building blocks’). At the heart of the CCR concept lie innovative pedagogical practices that emerge when teachers use ICT in their efforts to organize newer and improved forms of open-ended, collaborative, and meaningful learning activities, rather than simply to enhance traditional pedagogies, such as expository lessons and task-based learning.
A preliminary analysis of two existing cases of ICT-enabled innovation for learning is presented in order to show (i) how the proposed key dimensions and reference parameters are implemented in real-life settings to configure profoundly diverse types of CCR and (ii) to depict the systemic approach needed for the sustainable implementation and progressive up-scaling of Creative Classrooms across Europe.
Website – A Partnership between Parents, Students and SchoolseLearning Papers
The website developed by the 1.b class at the Augusta Šenoa elementary school is, first and foremost, a pioneering work stemming from cooperation among teachers and parents. The purpose of the website is to inform, activate, and involve parents, students and teachers who work in the classroom. Each activity is documented, giving insight into the everyday activities, and making the classroom visible and transparent to everyone. The project uses new technology (forum, gallery of student work, class mail), and enlists a partnership of parents, who made parts of the website.
Academic Staff Development in the Area of Technology Enhanced Learning in UK ...eLearning Papers
This paper reports on a study on staff development in the area of technology enhanced learning in UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) that took place in November, 2011. Data for this study were gathered via an online survey emailed to the Heads of e-Learning Forum (HeLF) which is a network comprised of one senior staff member per UK institution, leading the enhancement of learning and teaching through the use of technology. Prior to the survey, desk-based research on some universities’ publicly available websites gathered similar information about staff development in the area of technology enhanced learning. The online survey received 27 responses, approaching a quarter of all UK HEIs subscribed to the Heads of e-Learning forum list (118 is the total number). Both pre-1992 (16 in number) and post-1992 Universities (11 in number) were represented in the survey and findings indicate the way this sample of UK HEIs are approaching staff development in the area of TEL.
The Ageing Brain: Neuroplasticity and Lifelong LearningeLearning Papers
The role of adult education is becoming increasingly important in the framework of policies to promote lifelong learning. Adult participation in training activities, however, is still rather low, despite the incentives and initiatives aimed at allowing all citizens access
to education and training at all ages in their lives.
Participation tends to decrease concomitantly with increasing age: the major difficulty that elderly people have in learning is due to a deterioration of brain function, causing a progressive weakening of concentration, memory and mental flexibility. Today, advanced
researches in neuroscience show that brain ageing may be reversible: the brain
is plastic in all stages of life, and its maps can restructure themselves through learning experiences.
Checklist for a Didactically Sound Design of eLearning ContenteLearning Papers
The design of elearning content requires several areas of educational psychology to be
integrated. In order to enhance the design process, checklists can be used as a means of formative evaluation. We present a checklist for the design and formative evaluation of elearning modules.
It covers the content, segmenting, sequencing and navigation, adaptation to target audience,
design of text and graphics, learning tasks and feedback, and motivation. In the context of a project on designing elearning modules on renewable energies, this
checklist was successfully used for providing formative feedback to the developers.
The International Student and the Challenges of Lifelong LearningeLearning Papers
Although few people would oppose the view that lifelong learning is intended to be a positive experience, it should be borne in mind that an ageing student body might require the development of additional tools and skills for the online educator.
In this short paper we present two cases of challenges faced by international learners who brought with them into the learning environment some issues that were the product, not only of the age of the learner in question, but also of the geographical environment
in which they studied. The names of the learners have been changed.
Fostering Older People’s Digital Inclusion to Promote Active AgeingeLearning Papers
Within the framework of the European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, ECDL Foundation will partner with AGE Platform Europe to promote older people’s digital inclusion.
This collaboration involves the launch of an updated ICT training programme adapted to older people’s needs: a revised version of the ECDL Foundation’s accessible ICT training programme, EqualSkills.
eLearning and Social Networking in Mentoring Processes to Support Active AgeingeLearning Papers
Mentoring is a human resources development process often used to induct, introduce and guide staff into places of employment.
Training people on the job or using elderly people as mentors can be organised to address aspects like skill shortage in organisations, recruiting and retaining personal with the necessary knowledge and active involvement of older people. In this paper we present some aspects of mentoring, particularly the ICT support of such process and
give examples.
The Virtuous Circle of Use, Attitude, Experience and Digital InclusioneLearning Papers
eAdoption refers to how people learn to become ICT users. “Digital inclusion” however is a more complex status, related to people’s participation in communities and in other dimensions of society, based on knowledge. It refers to areas such as social relationships,
work, culture, politics, and so on.
This paper looks at how to evaluate digital inclusion, using an analysis that considers not only individual factors but community and social ones as well, going beyond an
eadoption perspective that is limited to a focus on skill-level.
Checklist for a Didactically Sound Design of eLearning ContenteLearning Papers
Authors: Cornelia Schoor and Hermann Körndle-
The design of elearning content requires several areas of educational psychology to be integrated. In order to enhance the design process, checklists can be used as a means of formative evaluation. We present a checklist for the design and formative...
The International Student and the Challenges of Lifelong LearningeLearning Papers
Authors: David Mathew and Susan Sapsed
Although few people would oppose the view that lifelong learning is intended to be a positive experience, it should be borne in mind that an ageing student body might require the development of additional tools and skills for the online educator.
Fostering Older People’s Digital Inclusion to Promote Active AgeingeLearning Papers
Authors: Conor Brownlee
Within the framework of the European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, ECDL Foundation will partner with AGE Platform Europe to promote older people’s digital inclusion.
The Virtuous Circle of Use, Attitude, Experience and Digital InclusioneLearning Papers
Authors: Roger Esteller-Curto, Raúl Marín, Pilar Escuder-Mollon
eAdoption refers to how people learn to become ICT users. ‘Digital inclusion’ however is a more complex status, related to people's participation in communities and in other dimensions of society, based on knowledge.
The Ageing Brain: Neuroplasticity and Lifelong LearningeLearning Papers
Authors: Eleonora Guglielman
The role of adult education is becoming increasingly important in the framework of policies to promote lifelong learning. Adult participation in training activities, however, is still rather low, despite the incentives and initiatives aimed at...
The Ageing Brain: Neuroplasticity and Lifelong Learning
Standing at the Crossroads: Mobile Learning and Cloud Computing at Estonian Schools
1. From the field
Standing at the Crossroads: Mobile Learning and
Cloud Computing at Estonian Schools
Authors This paper studies the impact of mobile learning implementation efforts in Estonian
school system – a process that has created a lot of controversy during the recent years.
Birgy Lorenz, Institute
of Informatics, Tallinn Best practices in mobile learning are available from the entire world, forcing schools
University, Estonia to keep up the push towards better connectivity and gadgetry. Even in the best cases
birgy.lorenz@gmail.com where the schools are provided with the necessary tools, the process has met a lot of
Kaido Kikkas, Estonian scepticism from teachers who are afraid to implement new methods. Teachers are of-
Information Technology ten cornered with the ‘comply or leave’ attitude from educational authorities, resulting
College; Tallinn University, in a multi-sided battle between involved parties.
Estonia
kaido.kikkas@kakupesa.net We have surveyed students, teachers, parents and management at five Estonian front-
runner schools to sort out the situation. The results show different attitudes among
students, school leaders and staff – while all of them mostly possess necessary tools
Tags and skills, teachers almost completely lack motivation to promote mobile learning. We
propose some positive and negative scenarios – for example, we predict major prob-
mobile learning, cloud
lems if teacher training will not change, e-safety policies are inadequately developed or
computing, e-safety policy,
implementing mobile authorities will continue the tendency to put all the eggs into one basket (e.g. by relying
learning, innovative schools solely on closed, corporate solutions for mobile learning platforms).
1. Introduction
The aim of our research is to analyse the current situation of mobile and cloud-based learn-
ing as well as Internet safety policy at Estonian schools. In Estonia, even innovative schools
are struggling to implement the new national curriculum with its prescribed new methods,
gadgets, improved interaction, mobile tools and cloud-based learning. The current school
situation reflects a cross-section of the whole society with colliding extremes – eager but
careless students with mobile gadgets, almost unlimited Internet connectivity and teachers
with their old learning methods where the leadership and wisdom are considered to be the
teacher’s domain. Some schools consider blocking the Web or all use of Internet or mo-
bile gadgets - even when it goes against the Constitution. At the same time we see growing
threats and risks when schools open themselves up to the “Brave New World” without criti-
cal thinking (e.g. some schools have blind faith in iPads – no other tablet will do). However,
while students from Asia and Africa are learning through innovative projects like the “Hole in
the Wall” experiment started by Sugata Mitra, Europe appears to be somewhat left behind,
often still struggling at pilot project stages – even if every child already has got the mobile
tools (provided by their parents) and they should just be brought to school.
Our first hypothesis (H1) is that schools are afraid to open the school environment to mobile
gadgets because of presumed extra expenses, safety issues (expensive software, privacy, vi-
ruses) and lack of discipline. For the second (H2) we suggest that the increasing individuality
of learning process will inevitably change the teacher’s role, but this is not accepted yet.
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
1
2. From the field
2. Background mobile phones just for leisure tend to get lower grades than
those who use ICT also for home- or classwork (Lorenz, 2011).
According to Pingdom (May 2012), mobile device use has risen
in the world by 192,5% in just three years (2010-2012), with top The status of e-learning in Estonia at the high school level has
countries in Africa and Asia. Also, it is predicted that in India, experienced various developments lately, some of which have
mobile Web traffic will overtake its PC counterpart during this been somewhat controversial. The new National Curriculum
year (Bosomworth, 2012; Pingdom, 2012). states an obligation for every school to use an e-learning envi-
ronment (National curriculum, 2011). The local authority usu-
The 2001 report by Pew Research Centre “The Digital Revolu-
ally provides centralized Internet service; sometimes it also tries
tion and Higher Education” claims that 29% of adult population
to support schools by buying computers. In Tallinn, schools have
and 50% of college students consider online courses to be on
an option to use a centralized web server, email and domain ser-
par with offline ones. Likewise, it has been suggested that the
vice (Infotehnoloogia, Tallinna Haridusameti IKT nõukogu pro-
next generation of e-learning will be cloud-based learning (CBL)
tokollid ja arengukava, 2012). At university /vocational school
(Dong, 2009). Youngsters who are used to have the opportunity
level, there are many open and non-open solutions to choose
to learn anytime and anywhere find it hard to accept that they
from, e.g. Wikiversity, Moodle, Blackboard, IVA, LeMill, Word-
have a limited access to school information and learning. To ad-
Press, etc (Estonian Information Technology Foundation, 2012).
dress that need there are several different learning systems de-
Using cloud solutions is still in a beginning phase, but there are
veloped to go beyond just sharing materials, adding blogs, dis-
some schools that have already done some testing in this field.
cussions, group work etc. These virtual learning environments
Some restrictions to implement these tools stem from the data
also function as personal learning environments and social net-
protection law and its interpretation by schools (Lorenz, 2012).
works (Soumplis, 2011; Syvänen, 2009; Patil, 2011).
M-learning is not yet implemented on the K-12 level in Esto-
As mobile devices (e.g. tablets) are increasingly used at school,
nia, but there are several good initiatives from Tallinn Univer-
it raises several new issues, e.g. how these tools can be con-
sity Centre for Educational Technology for training teachers
nected to local systems. Sometimes implementing these solu-
(Laanpere, 2011) and Estonian Information Technology College
tions is either impossible or very costly (Warschauer, 2011).
opened a software development laboratory for mobile devices
New cloud-based learning platforms are considered more flex-
(Puusaar, 2011) in 2011. Still, the training in these areas is lack-
ible and easier to implement as people use similar tools in their
ing continuity. As Tiger Leap Foundation (foundation whose
everyday life anyway (Wang, 2012). Some institutions provide
main purpose is to implement new technologies into schools in
private cloud services for their staff and students as well as ex-
Estonia) has pointed out that mobile software should be in Esto-
ternal people for collaboration purposes (Doelitzscher, 2011).
nian language rather than English to get better implementations
Among other things, cloud computing allows cutting the ex- for secondary schools. The cost of hardware and broadband has
penses on disk space. As Microsoft and Google provide schools also been mentioned as a reason why mobile learning is not im-
with free services capacity building for no extra cost, it is an plemented at schools yet (Zova, 2012).
option schools and local authorities are considering moving to
The Estonian Personal Protection Act states the need to secure
in the near future (Noor, 2010). CBL provides an option not only
data: access can only be granted to relevant persons, changes
to mirror and store data on the Net but also easier user admin-
have to be logged and data can only be processed in the Euro-
istration and single-password login to different services. CBL is
pean legislative area - yet some cloud service providers don’t
becoming increasingly common worldwide as it is easier and
specify where the servers are located (Personal Data Protection
seems to be a perfect solution to bring schools into the new age
Act, 1995). At the same time, the Data Protection Inspectorate
of teaching and learning (Al-Zoube, 2009; Pocatilu, 2010).
states that due to the problem being common to the whole Eu-
rope (not only Estonia), they will not ban companies from us-
2.1. Estonian situation ing cloud systems, at least for time being. Estonian government
institutions are also required to analyse their services to be in
The Pisa 2009 results in Estonia report higher usage of ICT tools
accordance with the IT Baseline Security System (ISKE) (Infosüs-
at home (96%) than at school (53%). Students who use ICT and
teemide turvameetmete süsteem ISKE, 2012).
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
2
3. From the field
The rising interest of using clouds at school is understandable Stage III: in autumn we gathered an expert group (ICT, educa-
as it provides savings from server costs simplifies maintenance tion) of five people to discuss the results and predict the trends
over the Internet and improves usability for teachers and stu- in the field. We also used students from grades 8 and 9 (26 stu-
dents (they can use it everywhere and any time, both with com- dents) from one of the schools as experts to discuss what the
puters and mobile devices). The main problems seem to be the future learning should look like.
possibly conflicting level of implementation (national vs local),
possible security risks and the danger of re-inventing the wheel’
at every school due to the lack of coordination. In textbook and
4. Results
e-learning area the Ministry of Education (MoE) has sent a pro-
posal to change the law about books and textbooks being ready
4.1. Leadership and management
to access in online (Smutov, 2012). A common denominator in all the schools is the feeling that
they are pathfinders in the field with only foreign examples to
Recent results from the general education assessment reports
look upon. In addition to this, we found some other similar fea-
indicates that possibilities for professional development are
tures but also some notable differences.
good, but teachers lack motivation (Ojakivi, 2012). An impor-
tant factor is low salary, but also overloading – working over- Similarities – the leaders at all the schools use smart devices,
time is commonplace (Timakov, 2012). Also, recently there are have spoken openly in the press about their school mobile tools
examples of techno-scepticism: some schools and even Tallinn usage, have a vision how to implement cloud, gadgets and BYOD
University of Technology have in some places implemented (Bring Your Own Device - the approach that favours using one’s
policies banning mobile phones (Kahro, 2011) and even laptops own personal devices at school/work) in school life. The schools
(Filippov, 2012). Problems inside the teacher training and delays have an ICT specialist or educational technologist on board and
of educational reforms play also a big part how new technolo- at least two people supporting staff and students. In teacher
gies are not implemented yet (Toots, 2012). training options, all the schools had some kind of extra ICT
methods training provided to the teachers during the last year.
3. Methods The schools had a roadmap for ICT usage as well as lists of ser-
vices provided by the school to teachers and students. They also
We carried out a three-stage study at five Harju County schools
monitored their ICT development and used the experiences to
in 2012. The schools were selected for their use of mobile
implement new things. All the schools had some project-based
technologies in classroom (laptops, tablets or phones). We
experience working with private or government funding. Final-
compared various factors like management principles, funding
ly, cloud-based learning options were available at every school
options, ideologies for managing and using technical gadgets,
(Google, Dropbox or Live@edu).
training etc.
Differences – first of all, the tools used were different: some
Stage I: We surveyed students and teachers using Limesurvey
used only iPads, others a laptop-based lab some used only
(survey application tool). Lists, Likert scale and open-ended an-
smartphones and some schools combine all those. One school
swers were used in the questionnaire.
also forbids use of student’s mobile phones at class time, but
• In spring, 345 students aged 10-16 conducted a survey allows computers. Some schools stressed that parents and stu-
about mobile usage and trends at school. The study was di- dents should bring the devices and school should not provide
vided into five sections: background, technical skills, learn- new gadgets for learning. Some schools shared more responsi-
ing environment at school, future e-textbook, policy; bilities with students - e.g. one school had an ICT support group
• In autumn, 29 teachers from the same schools conducted a for teachers and students. In management, two schools had
similar survey. given the right to choose tools and means to some privileged
teachers, while others implement things based on grades – e.g.
Stage II: in autumn we interviewed ICT specialists, educational
“we implement new things only in the gymnasium stage and
technologists or principals of these schools. Two schools also
therefore our ICT specialist will be responsible for all the imple-
allowed parents to participate in the discussion.
mentation”. The largest school had 1100 students, the smallest
had 300. Some schools select students through tests, while oth-
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
3
4. From the field
ers accept everyone. Schools also differ in funding options: some name any educational applications. They mostly used phones
schools had extra funding to implement ICT and train teachers as their personal tools to send SMS and call family and friends,
or students. Finally there was a difference in attitude towards but some also play pre-installed games, surf the web or watch
implementing free wireless connection: two schools allowed it, videos with them (10 out of 29). They also strongly agree that
others restricted it (quoting problems with bandwidth). the school should provide both teachers and students all the
gadgets they need, but 72% are also in favour of the idea that
4.2. Teachers, students and innovation students will bring their own devices as these tools are likely
more modern than what the school could ever provide.
A typical student owns a smartphone and a laptop; usually
they have also extra tools for the family at home. Tablet PC-s In studying various activities in-class involving mobile learning,
is still rare, but already visible as Christmas wishes. Using mo- we outlined seven types of tasks: homework, group work with
bile phones during classes is normal, but students feel that they or without supervision in class, work outside the classroom, in
could do more with it than just calculate, visit school web or international groups and individual tasks with or without super-
search information. They feel they are experts in using technol- vision. Student activity level, opportunity to do their own things
ogy, but they need help in setting goals. They are not happy with and interest was monitored.
teachers still trying to restrict the use of modern technology. • Activity level - we found teachers overestimating it; while
teachers stated that students work hard in their lessons
Students think that they should have the option of BYOD. The
regardless of methods, students felt that when teacher is
school should provide some regulations (to maintain discipline
absent form class, or when teacher is in class but is assist-
and prevent cyber bullying) and provide training about educa-
ing others, they don’t have to be active. An example: 76%
tional use of devices. When we asked about the future “e-school
teachers think that when they temporarily leave the class,
bag”, they felt that it should be a mix of interactive e-books,
students will continue working - students say that only 20%
e-textbooks, and teachers’ web pages containing whatever is
do that. To make things worse, when teacher is in class and
needed. At the same time, the ideas of a “school memory stick”
students may turn to him/her for help, the teacher usually
and a school video channel got fewer votes.
gets overwhelmed with questions. As a result, most of the
Regarding methods used in class, students favoured labs, out- class (78%) will still feel as left on their own - compared to
door learning, individual or peer learning and watching videos. the teacher being physically absent (82%), there is very lit-
Some methods seemed more frightening than others, e.g. act- tle difference;
ing in a play, introducing one’s study results to the others or • Homework - when teachers feel that students have the
other kinds of public performance. freedom to choose whether to do or not to do the home-
work, the students say that they are obliged to complete
Meanwhile, the typical teacher is a female who has worked as
the tasks with no choice;
a teacher for more than 12 years. She uses her personal lap-
top as well as a PC in the class. 1/3 of the teachers have also • Interest - students were most interested in group assign-
a smartphone (those who have been working less than 7 year ments and tasks outside the class. However, teachers were
at school). She has been participating in various e-learning and less interested in these tasks.
technical courses about eTwinning (collaboration platform for The common tools and methods used in lessons are books, text-
schools in Europe), e-learning tools and services even when she books, e-materials (videos, texts and presentations), lab equip-
is not an ICT teacher. She feels that she is average or skilled in ment, and individual or peer tasks. Teachers felt little use for
using computers in class. All teachers know how to use projec- gaming consoles, presenting group work analysis to the whole
tors and computers; usually only 1/3 allow students to be active school, play, projects with partners inside and outside the
computer users in lessons. school, distance learning or Skype lessons. At the same time,
1/3 or the students were very interested in using gaming con-
Typical tasks include searching for information, using different
soles or Skype during the lessons. All in all, students tend to
media (pictures, graphs and videos) and e-mail. Some know
prefer more active, outdoor or technology-related assignments
how to upload files, but it is not commonly mentioned. Mo-
while teachers don’t like them that much (see Figure 1).
bile tools were not used in classes and teachers were unable to
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
4
5. From the field
is still in developing stage, there should not
be firm rules yet, only recommendations
or agreements would be useful. 79% of the
students feel that there should be more
learning materials and guidelines how to
use technology in class.
We also noticed that students considered
the rules and policies only applicable in
classes but not during the breaks or oth-
erwise in the school premises but outside
lessons (see Figure 2).
4.4. To BYOD or not to
BYOD?
The teachers’ view on BYOD is somewhat
contradictory. On the one hand, many of
them sounded at least moderately opti-
mistic:
• “Students are responsible of their own
Figure 1: Tools and methods considered attractive gadgets, also when it stops working or
gets lost/stolen.”
One of the greatest divides between the
opinions of teachers and students was about
whether to allow BYOD (31% teachers, 75%
students) and using equipment lent to stu-
dents for personal use. Teachers felt that it’s
only applicable where really needed and 97%
suggested that the devices should be central-
ly managed by the school.
4.3. Restrictions and policy
When asked about policies and regulation,
all the teachers were convinced that the
rules and regulations are needed, as they are
aware of new problems (illegal picture tak-
ing, cheating during tests etc).
While all the teachers supported policies for
using computers, mobile tools networks, only
55% of considered it their task to teach stu-
dents how to use mobile tools in an educa-
tional setting. At the same time, students feel
Figure 2: Views on rules and regulations – teachers vs
that as the area of BYOD and new technology
students
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
5
6. From the field
• “Without policy and rules, these kinds of lesson cannot be School leaders point out problems regarding personal usage of
controlled - I have an experienced it myself as we had a the tools, as student can use different and lose some impor-
2-year project with students using laptops.” tant work during the transition (especially if the information is
• “Let the students bring their tools and we teach them to considered too sensitive to save in cloud). There is also a wide-
use them in an educational setting.” spread belief that the only real tool for mobile learning is iPad
and others don’t meet the needs - the problem is that compa-
• “When parents buy these tools and allow bringing them to
nies selling devices, and books as well as textbook publishers
school, I am not against it.”
have managed to successfully plant the idea of “One Right Plat-
• “it is possible only when the teachers are willing to use
form”, resulting in no competition and high prices in the long
them.”
run. School leaders are also ambivalent about using the cloud,
• “Interaction would make the lessons more interesting, I citing concerns about data protection
have more ideas and options to teach.”
From the parents’ side, the main concerns were the initial cost
• “When students use their own tools it is better as then they
of the device, but also whether the school can be trusted with
know the technical solutions and I don’t have to deal with
their children’s expensive tools - young children may get bullied
it.”
or robbed, and the older ones are just too careless (e.g. leave
• “The use of gadgets must remain voluntary and it only
the device unattended or drop it). Nevertheless, 43% of parents
makes sense for a suitable topic.”
are willing to think about it if the experience could really help
On the other hand, they were unwilling to take responsibility: students to learn.
• “Parents, children and management are more interested
than the teachers.” 4.5. Trends and best practices in the field
• “Some tools are also provided from the school, but no help Experts say that every school is a bit different, but they see a
is being offered.” trend in how innovative schools have started to implement new
• “Rules and regulations give students the knowledge and technologies and tools. In Estonia, the new national curriculum
skills, tools are not a solution per se (it does not matter has also provided some input and support the idea that teach-
whether I use them or not); ers should update their teaching methods.
• “These tools are not usable in my language learning class- Recommendations from school leaders and ICT specialists could
es; I don’t have methods and room for these tools.” be outlined in five phases:
• “Some students have the devices, some do not. I may not
• introduction - visit other similar schools in Estonia and
have it either. So the solution is to use school’s tools only“
abroad, also ask technology companies present their ideas
• “We have all the materials we need: books and textbooks, to the school staff to raise the interest towards using cloud-
computers and projectors. We do not need students bring- based or mobile learning;
ing in anymore.”
• involvement - teachers themselves should gather informa-
• “Not every school can provide these tools for everybody.” tion about using the tools in their respective subjects;
The views of management and experts also differ. Technical side • practice - the tools should be provided to the teachers for
the school worries about losing money as some tools eg. iPad testing. Some schools have started to involve students –
asks to type in your credit card number to use the Apple App- however a substantial digital divide between students and
Store. ICT specialists also complain that these new tools are a teachers (in favour of the former) often causes teachers to
headache to manage - installing applications, dealing with soft- feel being attacked;
ware, privacy problems, backing up data, poor WiFi networks • implementation – as the funds are limited, schools are of-
etc. They also fear that the full potential of the devices could ten forced to decide which level to start on (primary, sec-
not be used - the tablet PC would degrade to being a media ondary, gymnasium). Some schools have started from the
player or substitute for a book. gymnasium level as it is also a good way to attract better
prospective students, yet others feel that in order to allow
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
6
7. From the field
teachers to learn alongside students it is best to implement 5. Discussion
it from the first or second grade;
When we first started to study mobile and cloud learning we
• sharing – as new content and exercises is needed, it is para-
presumed Estonia to be pretty well-developed, as people is
mount to get teachers to share their work (at the moment,
using social networks, different e-tools and a lot of people al-
fears concerning authorship etc. are still widespread).
ready possess smart devices – our first idea was to share the
We see this step being taken in innovative schools, but other best practices about what innovative schools are experimenting
schools are still on standby (as if they would like to learn from with. However, the survey results showed a different picture.
others’ mistakes) and the educational content prescribed buy While Estonian youth can be seen experiencing the increas-
the new curriculum is still scarce. Experts warn that although ingly modern, speedy and interactive life, already the Pisa 2009
there is a substantial learning curve, the schools that wait for pointed out that Estonian homes are well-equipped, but not
too long will put themselves into weaker position by losing the schools. Now in 2012, we see that not much has changed in
trust of students (as the technological gap between school and three years in the methodical sense.
home grows further).
We see a large digital divide between teachers and students.
When we discussed the future classroom and mobile learning Overall the teacher who has worked at school for 12 years feels
with our students involved as experts, they pointed out that the that new technology and media is pushing him/her to a direc-
average lesson is too academic and static, they never make use tion where there is no “rock to hold on”. The world has changed,
of interesting tools, go outside or do practical exercises to solve yet ordinary teachers still feel that students can be controlled by
“real-life problems”. They emphasized that the usage of com- developing even more rules and regulations, hoping for a regu-
puters in classroom is low and there are no e-textbooks. Also, lation that scares technology off the classroom.
they are ready to use more cloud-based services as they already
Various literary sources suggest that education will be more
are using school e-mail provided through Google Scholar or Mi-
interactive and personal when these new tools get introduced
crosoft Live@edu system (see Figure 3).
in classes, yet a significant number of people are completely
against using mobile devices at school. There should be a mid-
dle ground (as using the technology cannot be compulsory), but
the rejection and reluctance of the teachers should be seriously
addressed.
Management wise, the innovative schools have implemented
new technology in different ways – bottom up (starting with al-
lowing the students to use it at school) or top-down (train teach-
ers, provide tools, leaders as role models). All the schools have
provided an opportunity to use school gadgets (laptops, smart
phones) and learning environments (closed or open learning
Figure 3: Keywords for future learning as suggested by environments, cloud computing). Still, where the management
students
sees the bright future, teachers reach for sunglasses - even
younger teachers are not exactly applauding on new technol-
Other best practices outlined were using videos and applications
ogy. We’d see some ice melting as the way of thinking changes
in science, mathematics and language classes and using GPS.
– 55% of teachers feel the responsibility to do something and
At the same time, students do not feel that the mobile tools
provide support for the students, but only 31% really allow it
are “learning devices” yet as the teachers do not see them that
to happen.
way. Student have more skills and more smart tools than ever
(it is even difficult nowadays to find a “non-smart” phone in the As mentioned above, teachers feel more in control over the
market!). Yet another issue is the language - teachers would like classroom than the real situation shows – when the teacher
more Estonian-language applications, while students are happy leaves the classroom, most students will not continue to work
with English as long as the tool itself is intuitive enough. on the assignment as they have not experienced freedom and
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
7
8. From the field
self-responsibility. Estonian teachers are often very strict and • include parents and students to the educational processes
everybody is learning exactly what the programme or book as partners to allow them to provide their expertise and
offers – experiencing new tools, methods and ways should be funding to buy and maintain the tools;
much more a priority. Another problem is the stark difference • the MoE should strive to change the legislation on e-text-
in task preferences – student would like more group work, but books and also form a committee where publishers, edu-
teachers feel uneasy in this, promoting traditional individual cational and technical experts are working together to pro-
homework instead. vide guidelines to open educational content development.
On the methodological side, students are eager to test out and If the guidelines are not in place, more friction will result be-
learn new methods but teachers feel too “worn out or tired” to tween students and their parents who are open to new tools
even test out things like outdoor or practical learning, internet and the “old-fashioned” teachers. On the one hand, teachers
or real life gaming or even interactive assignments – in all these, will keep feeling attacked, on the other hand the students will
students’ interest is far higher than teachers’ willingness to give largely be left on their own, resulting in being open to various
this kind of tasks. A serious problem likely behind this is teach- online risks (e.g. cyber-bullying). And without the counsel of a
ers being overworked, underpaid and having low social status broad expert committee the MoE has but very little idea about
as reforms have been delayed from the government part (Toots, how to solve the problem.
2012).
Teachers seem to be more interested in controlling the tools 6. Conclusion
and environment the students are working with (as only 31% To conclude, we feel the situation being controversial. We see a
supported BYOD and 28% smart phone use in-class). Another danger that Estonia will be running blindly towards restrictions
clear difference is seen in attitudes towards regulations - 100% and closure – teachers favour policies that can seriously ham-
of teachers are voting for the clear rules, while only 61% of stu- mer new technologies in classroom. Students need new tools
dents support them. At the same time, teachers feel unable to and methods, adults do not know how to provide them and a
help the students, even if 79% of them state the need of help lot of teachers are simply not ready for them.
in order to use new technology in a meaningful and educational
way. To close the gap, we see some potentially good initiatives from
innovative schools, at the same time they are still struggling to
Parents seem to feel “caught in the middle” and lack under- involve teachers – this is the key factors students are already
standing of the cost, usefulness and responsibility issues. They experiencing and using the new solutions daily.
also feel that not all of the parents will have the resources to
provide all the gadgets that may become outdated in just two In the longer run, only the fast ones will pass though the learn-
years. And school leaders and ICT staff have their own challeng- ing curve relatively painlessly and reach the state of mobile
es in how-what-when-whether the school needs these tools. learning. A very important player will be the state (MoE) –
whether they take an active role by including experts to address
Our suggestions to change the situation for the better are: the issue, or they do nothing and “let the salesmen work”. The
• reorganize teacher training as soon as possible – both for latter scenario will result in schools choosing shiny non-open
training the new teacher generation and re-training the solutions with steep prices which will likely grow over the head
older ones; of most schools soon. Future work in this field should also pay
• provide working policies for teachers in order to use new more attention to the risks involved (e.g. health) as well as both
technology in classrooms in a safe way; technical (development and maintenance) and content issues.
• recognize best practices in the innovative schools to first
introduce the gadgets to teachers and let themselves to in-
vestigate the opportunities for in-class use, as opposed to
blindly “buying in” solutions that may or may not work in
the particular school environment;
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
8
9. From the field
References Laanpere, M. E-õppest m-õppeni (2011) In M-õuesõpe
Lemill.net from http://lemill.net/content/webpages/e-oppest-m-
Al-Zoube, M. (2009) E-learning on the Cloud, International
oppeni
Arab Journal of e-Technology,Vol. 1, No. 2, June
Lorenz, B. (2011) Pisa 2009 ICT results, Estonia. In National
Bersin, J. (2011) From e-learining to We-learning and m-learning,
Exam and Qualificaton Centre Pisa Research results page from
HR Technology Conference 2011, october from http://www.
http://www.epl.ee/news/eesti/kool-keelas-kiusamise-hirmus-
slideshare.net/jbersin/mobile-and-informal-learning-trends-
mobiilide-sisselulitamise.d?id=60949019
for-2012
Lorenz, B., Kalde, K., Kikkas, K. (2012) Trust and Security
Bosomworth, D. (2012) Mobile Market Statistics 2012, Smart
Issues in Cloud-Based Learning and Management, The 11th Inter-
Insights from http://www.smartinsights.com/mobile-marketing/
national Conference on Web-based Learning 2012
mobile-marketing-analytics/mobile-marketing-statistics/
Noor, S., Mustafa, G., Chowdhury, S. A., Hossain, Md.
Clark, N. Quinn (2011) Mobile Learning: Landscape and Trends,
Z., Jaigirdar, F. T. A (2010) Proposed Architecture of Cloud
The eLearning Guild from https://commons.lbl.gov/download/
Computing for Education System in Bangladesh and the Impact
attachments/77828943/mobile2011report-f2.pdf
on Current Education System, IJCSNS International Journal of
Doelitzscher, F., Sulistio, A., Reich, C., Kuijs H., Wolf, D. Computer Science and Network Security,VOL.10 No.10, October
(2011) Private cloud for collaboration and e-Learning services:
Ojakivi, M. (2012) Eesti õpetajatel jääb puudu motivatsioonist,
from IaaS to SaaS. Computing,Volume 91, Number 1, 23-42, DOI:
ERR Uudised from http://uudised.err.ee/index.php?06265941
10.1007/s00607-010-0106-z
Patil, M., Kulkarni, V Negulur, G., Pashupatimath (2011)
.,
Dong, B., Zheng, Q., Yang, J., Li, H., Qiao, M. (2009) An
A. CLEM - A Cloud Based Learning Environment for Millennial:
E-learning Ecosystem Based on Cloud Computing Infrastructure.
Learn – Anytime, Anywhere. P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Inter-
In ICALT ‘09 Proceedings of the 2009 Ninth IEEE International
net Computing (3PGCIC), 2011 International Conference. ISBN:
Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, IEEE Computer
978-1-4577-1448-1
Society Washington, DC, USA ISBN: 978-0-7695-3711-5
Personal Data Protection Act (1995), Directive 95/46/EC of
Estonian Information Technology Foundation (EITF), (2012)
the European Parliament and of the Council
“E-Learning Development Centre Strategy”, Tallinn from http://
www.e-ope.ee/images/50000894/eLDC_Strategy.pdf Pingdom (2010), Mobile share of web traffic in Asia has tripled
since 2010 from http://royal.pingdom.com/2012/05/08/mobile-
Filippov, M. (2012) TTÜs keelati loengutes arvutite ja nutitele-
web-traffic-asia-tripled/
fonide kasutamine, Postimees Online from http://www.postimees.
ee/724032/ttus-keelati-loengutes-arvutite-ja-nutitelefonide- Pocatilu, P., Alecu, F., Vetrici, M. (2010) Measuring the Ef-
kasutamine/ ficiency of Cloud Computing for E-learning Systems.Vseas
Transactions on Computers Issue 1,Volume 9, January 2010 ISSN:
Infosüsteemide turvameetmete süsteem ISKE (2012), from
1109-2750
http://www.ria.ee/iske/
Puusaar, M. (2011) IT Kolledžis avatakse mobiilseadmete tark-
Infotehnoloogia, Tallinna Haridusameti IKT nõukogu
varaarenduse labor. Estonian Information Technology College
protokollid ja arengukava (2012) from http://www.tallinn.ee/
press release from http://www.itcollege.ee/blog/2011/04/28/it-
haridus/otsing?oks=6198
kolledzis-avatakse-mobiilseadmete-tarkvaraarenduse-labor/
Kahro, I. (2011) Kool keelas kiusamise hirmus mobiilide sisselüli-
Smutov, M. (2012) Ministeerium hakkab panustama e-õppevarale,
tamise, Eesti Päevaleht from http://www.epl.ee/news/eesti/kool-
Postimees Online, from http://www.postimees.ee/720350/minis-
keelas-kiusamise-hirmus-mobiilide-sisselulitamise.d?id=60949019
teerium-hakkab-panustama-e-oppevarale/
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
9
10. From the field
Soumplis, A., Chatzidaki, E., Koulocheri, E., Xenos, M. ganization ISSN 2227-5029 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/
(2011) Implementing an Open Personal Learning Environment, images/0021/002164/216451e.pdf
PCI ‘11 Proceedings of the 2011 15th Panhellenic Conference on
Vabariigi Valitsus (2011) “Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava,”. [On-
Informatics, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA ISBN:
line]. from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114012011002.
978-1-61284-962-1
Vuorikari, R., Garoia, V Balanskat, A. (2011) Introducing
.,
Syvänen, A., Muukkonen, J., Sihvonen, M. (2009) Are the
Netbook Pedagogies in Schools Acer- European Schoolnet Edu-
open issues of social software-based personal learning environment
cational Netbook Pilot, European Schoolent from http://files.eun.
practices being addressed? MindTrek ‘09 Proceedings of the 13th
org/netbooks/Acer_Netbook_Study.pdf
International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiqui-
tous Era, ACM New York, NY, USA ISBN: 978-1-60558-633-5 Warschauer, M. (2011) Learning in the Cloud. Technology,
Education – Connections (The TEC Series). Teachers College,
Timakov, M. (2012) Õpetaja töönädal on siiski 56 tundi pikk,
Columbia University. ISBN 978-0-8077-5250-0
Õpetajate leht nr. 41, p.3
Wang, Y., Lin, H., Rong, H. (2012) Design of Network Learn-
Toots, A. (2012) Õpetajate koolitamise ja edutamise poliitikad
ing Platform Based on Cloud-Computation. Advanced Materials
OECD maades, Riigikogu Toimetised from http://www.riigikogu.
Research (Volumes 488 - 489), Key Engineering Materials II
ee/rito/index.php?id=16113
Zova, K. (2012) Kohtumine teemal “e-õppevarast mobiilsete
Turning on Mobile learning global themes (2012)
seadmetele”. In Tiigrihüppe Sihtasutus protokoll from http://goo.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Or-
gl/41QjT
Edition and production
Name of the publication: eLearning Papers Copyrights
ISSN: 1887-1542
The texts published in this journal, unless otherwise indicated, are subject
Publisher: elearningeuropa.info
to a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivativeWorks
Edited by: P.A.U. Education, S.L. 3.0 Unported licence. They may be copied, distributed and broadcast pro-
Postal address: c/Muntaner 262, 3r, 08021 Barcelona (Spain) vided that the author and the e-journal that publishes them, eLearning
Phone: +34 933 670 400 Papers, are cited. Commercial use and derivative works are not permitted.
Email: editorial@elearningeuropa.info The full licence can be consulted on http://creativecommons.org/licens-
Internet: www.elearningpapers.eu es/by-nc-nd/3.0/
ing
earn
eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eu
eL ers
32
u
ers.e
gpap
.elea
rnin n.º 32 • December 2012
Pap
www
10