Dr. Vesna Straser will discuss the differences in expected slippage between live trading, simulation trading and backtesting. Typically in backtesting signal generation and order fill assumptions are simplified to obtain strategy performance data faster. For example, many commercial back testing software providers will work with sampled data such as minute open or close price points and assume that the signal is triggered at the close of one bar and filled at the close price of the next bar, per the assumed slippage model. Simulation trading, however, will typically run on tick trading data (live or replayed) potentially resulting in quite different dynamics versus back testing. Orders are filled per fill assumptions that may vary significantly between different providers. In live trading, orders are triggered and executed immediately under real market conditions and order type. Depending on the trading strategy, live trading results can differ dramatically from back-testing and/or simulation trading. Vesna will outline the issues, analytics to track, factors to consider and how to account for them to achieve “realistic” back-testing results.