Innovating to simplify!
Mumbai
May 10, 2018
Part 1: Engineering Notch Fatigue
Analysis
or, what is inside that black box in ANSYS, ABAQUS, nCode, etc…
R. Sunder, BiSS (P) Ltd
Bangalore, India, +91 9880-432322
rs@biss.in
1
Innovating to simplify!
High Performance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide!
BISS OPERATIONS
• Development, manufacture and support of high
precision, high performance digitally controlled
mechanical test systems “N to MN range”
• Testing services: 25 test systems, 16 servo-actuators
serving aerospace, automobile, nuclear, defence and
energy sectors
• Research & development including collaborative
effort
• Training & education in testing and mechanical
property evaluation related to Fatigue, Fracture,
Dynamic Response (shake tables)
Innovating to simplify!
High Performance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide!3
MARKET PRESENCE IN PRODUCTS & TESTING SERVICES
RAILWAYS
EDUCATION AEROSPACER&D AUTOMOTIVE
DEFENCE
Innovating to simplify!
High Performance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide!
COLLABORATION
Innovating to simplify!
The dilemma posed by Metal Fatigue –
Born out of Industrial Revolution
e
s
su
sy
s-1
Don’t speed!!!
5
Innovating to simplify!
Consequence of mechanical failure
Embarrassment - Damage to image
Injury – death - Liabilities - bankruptcy 6
Innovating to simplify!
Material inputs for fatigue analysis:
E, K’, n’, b, c determined as per ASTM E606
'/1
'
n
KE







ss
e
Innovating to simplify!
Service Load Spectra
8
Innovating to simplify!
• Account for the statistics of amplitude
variation – D = ∑(ni/Nfi)
• Account for variation in notch root
local mean stress
Requirements of
Fatigue Analysis
‘The dance in engineering notch fatigue
analysis is around sm…… ’
9
Innovating to simplify!
The Stress-Strain Curve (Masing Model)
Comprehending material ‘memory’by linearization
1
1
2
4
3
5
e
s
2
3
4
5
'/1
'
n
KE







ss
e
Innovating to simplify!
Simulation Works….
Early work by Jhansale [1978]
1
1
2
4
3
5
e
s
2
3
4
5
'/1
'
n
KE







ss
e
Innovating to simplify!
Smooth Specimen Response Upon Unloading
1
2
e
s
1
1
2
4
3
5
e
s
2
3
4
5
Innovating to simplify!
1
2
e
s
1
2
e
s
Other consequences:
Stress gradient
Constraint
Notch Root Response Upon Unloading
Innovating to simplify!
Consequence of stress-strain hysteresis
at the notch root
Stress
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
F
G
H
sC
s
e
sA
sG
sE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
(a)
(b)
(c)
Material memory + hysteresis
14
Innovating to simplify!
11
1
2
4
3
5
e
s
2
1
2
1
S
Transformation of Applied Loads to Local
Stress-Strain
'/1
'
n
t
KE
ESK








ss
e
se
'/1
'
n
aa
a
aaat
KE
ESK








ss
e
es
Two equations, two unknowns…..
Innovating to simplify!
And, How do you deal with this??
P
The small ones?
May be the BIG one?
Log(N)
sа
s’
16
Innovating to simplify!
Rainflow Cycle-Counting per ASTM E1049
17
Innovating to simplify!
Application of Rainflow in
Test Optimization
From such curves, one can determine the
consequences of ignoring smaller load
cycles while performing endurance testing
18
Innovating to simplify!
Summary: The Four Columns of the Fatigue Analysis Platform
ESKt ... es 
'/1
'2
2
n
KE





 



ss
e
12
3
1 – Material Memory 2 – Neuber transformation 3 – Rainflow cycle counting
4 – Damage computation
4
19
Innovating to simplify!
Positives of LSS Approach
1. Compatible with all FEM packages
2. Highly reproducible results (but not
necessarily with experiment!)
3. Has served industry for almost 40 years
4. Expandable to account for strain
hardening/softening, creep-fatigue
interaction, etc
5. Constants determined by standard
testing practice (ASTM E606):
E, K’, n’, b, c, ef’, sf’
Innovating to simplify!
Negatives of LSS Approach
1. Fails to ‘recognize’ fatigue as a
process of fatigue crack growth
2. Shaky rationale under fully
elastic conditions – consequence
of item 1….
Innovating to simplify!
Mumbai, May 10, 2018
Part 2:
The Impact of Fracture Mechanics on
Structural Integrity
R. Sunder, BiSS (P) Ltd
Bangalore, India, +91 9880-432322
rs@biss.in
22
Innovating to simplify!
23
Innovating to simplify!
Engine for Airbus 380
10,000 hrs between inspections….
24
Innovating to simplify!
Strength with defects –
Fracture Mechanics
Theory:
Elliptic stress raiser – /Inglis 1915/
Brittle fracture /Griffiths 1935/
Elasto-Plastic fracture /Irwin 1945/
Ship fractures WWII
25
Innovating to simplify!
Characterizing how severely a crack is stressed:
Stress Intensity Factor
Introduced by George Irwin – used as ‘industry standard’by the world from the 1960’s
K = Sa .Y
s = K / .r
K – Stress Intensity Factor (K)
Y – crack/specimen geometry
correction factor
r – distance from crack tip
2a
S
s
26
Innovating to simplify!
Kc – ‘Toughness’ in the presence of a defect
K
Kc = Sac .Y
Sc = Kc / .ac
Kc – Critical Stress Intensity
Factor (K)
Y – crack/specimen geometry
correction factor
27
Innovating to simplify!
The Compact Tension C(T) Specimen
28
Innovating to simplify!
Stress Intensity Factor, K = f (stress, crack size, geometry)
• K – the ‘gift’ from Fracture Mechanics helps characterize
residual strength and residual life of materials with defects (cracks)
Innovating to simplify!
Fracture Mechanics – the Platform to Switch to
Maintenance on Condition
ao
ac
Inspection
period
Detectable crack
size
Service Life
“Damage is easier to handle
when you can see it grow”
Innovating to simplify!
Fracture Mechanics & Risk Management
31
Innovating to simplify!
Summary: The Fracture Mechanics “Business Model”
– 1970’s onwards
K
da/dN
мм/Cycle
K – Stress intensity
Factor: Similarity
criterion for FM
1. K as a similarity
criterion – FEM
solutions
2. Test automation
for material data
generation
3. NDT to set initial
crack size
4. Critical crack size
driven by fracture
toughness
(Materials Engg)
5. da/dN curve
defining crack
kinetics
(Modeling)
1
2
3
4
5
Innovating to simplify!
Fracture Mechanics Application –
‘Local’ and Other Stories
33
Innovating to simplify!
Will it Leak? Or, will it burst??
34
Innovating to simplify!
Internal patch
35
Innovating to simplify!
Pressure cycling
Innovating to simplify!
J1c test result
for pipe
Minimum to
qualify
Safety
margin
First published
results on J1c
testing of pipe with
through subject to
internal pressure
37
Innovating to simplify!
Boeing 747: Fruits of
Structural Integrity Assurance
In service for 50 years
150,000 hrs+
service – 15-20 TBIs
40,000 t/o, landings
~240,000 km
on ground
100,000,000 km
2,500 times
around the equator
38
Innovating to simplify!
Five Tasks of ASIP
1. Design
Specification
2. Design &
Development
3. Full-Scale
Testing
4. Fleet Management
Data
5. Fleet Management
to Retirement
Innovating to simplify!
Innovating to simplify!
Innovating to simplify!
Innovating to simplify!
Load Spectrum Correction for
Composite Structures
Innovating to simplify!
44
Innovating to simplify!
45
Innovating to simplify!
46
Southwest Airlines 1360
Innovating to simplify!
47
Innovating to simplify!
High Performance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide!
SUMMARY
• Design is not merely to ensure functionality on Day #1:
It is about long term safe and economical operations
• Life-cycle outlook for nuclear installations extends to
25-40 years. Service loads and environmental factors
change material and structural behavior
• Design and condition monitoring address issues related
to Fatigue, Fracture, Creep and Corrosion
• Rigorous analysis based on reproducible material data,
supported by testing and periodic inspection and
maintenance determine long-term safety and economy
of operations
Innovating to simplify!
2017 – Silver Jubilee Year
Thank you! Questions??
rs@biss.in
49

Fracture mechanics&amp_Sundar R

  • 1.
    Innovating to simplify! Mumbai May10, 2018 Part 1: Engineering Notch Fatigue Analysis or, what is inside that black box in ANSYS, ABAQUS, nCode, etc… R. Sunder, BiSS (P) Ltd Bangalore, India, +91 9880-432322 rs@biss.in 1
  • 2.
    Innovating to simplify! HighPerformance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide! BISS OPERATIONS • Development, manufacture and support of high precision, high performance digitally controlled mechanical test systems “N to MN range” • Testing services: 25 test systems, 16 servo-actuators serving aerospace, automobile, nuclear, defence and energy sectors • Research & development including collaborative effort • Training & education in testing and mechanical property evaluation related to Fatigue, Fracture, Dynamic Response (shake tables)
  • 3.
    Innovating to simplify! HighPerformance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide!3 MARKET PRESENCE IN PRODUCTS & TESTING SERVICES RAILWAYS EDUCATION AEROSPACER&D AUTOMOTIVE DEFENCE
  • 4.
    Innovating to simplify! HighPerformance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide! COLLABORATION
  • 5.
    Innovating to simplify! Thedilemma posed by Metal Fatigue – Born out of Industrial Revolution e s su sy s-1 Don’t speed!!! 5
  • 6.
    Innovating to simplify! Consequenceof mechanical failure Embarrassment - Damage to image Injury – death - Liabilities - bankruptcy 6
  • 7.
    Innovating to simplify! Materialinputs for fatigue analysis: E, K’, n’, b, c determined as per ASTM E606 '/1 ' n KE        ss e
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Innovating to simplify! •Account for the statistics of amplitude variation – D = ∑(ni/Nfi) • Account for variation in notch root local mean stress Requirements of Fatigue Analysis ‘The dance in engineering notch fatigue analysis is around sm…… ’ 9
  • 10.
    Innovating to simplify! TheStress-Strain Curve (Masing Model) Comprehending material ‘memory’by linearization 1 1 2 4 3 5 e s 2 3 4 5 '/1 ' n KE        ss e
  • 11.
    Innovating to simplify! SimulationWorks…. Early work by Jhansale [1978] 1 1 2 4 3 5 e s 2 3 4 5 '/1 ' n KE        ss e
  • 12.
    Innovating to simplify! SmoothSpecimen Response Upon Unloading 1 2 e s 1 1 2 4 3 5 e s 2 3 4 5
  • 13.
    Innovating to simplify! 1 2 e s 1 2 e s Otherconsequences: Stress gradient Constraint Notch Root Response Upon Unloading
  • 14.
    Innovating to simplify! Consequenceof stress-strain hysteresis at the notch root Stress A B C D E A B C F G H sC s e sA sG sE A B C D E F G H (a) (b) (c) Material memory + hysteresis 14
  • 15.
    Innovating to simplify! 11 1 2 4 3 5 e s 2 1 2 1 S Transformationof Applied Loads to Local Stress-Strain '/1 ' n t KE ESK         ss e se '/1 ' n aa a aaat KE ESK         ss e es Two equations, two unknowns…..
  • 16.
    Innovating to simplify! And,How do you deal with this?? P The small ones? May be the BIG one? Log(N) sа s’ 16
  • 17.
    Innovating to simplify! RainflowCycle-Counting per ASTM E1049 17
  • 18.
    Innovating to simplify! Applicationof Rainflow in Test Optimization From such curves, one can determine the consequences of ignoring smaller load cycles while performing endurance testing 18
  • 19.
    Innovating to simplify! Summary:The Four Columns of the Fatigue Analysis Platform ESKt ... es  '/1 '2 2 n KE           ss e 12 3 1 – Material Memory 2 – Neuber transformation 3 – Rainflow cycle counting 4 – Damage computation 4 19
  • 20.
    Innovating to simplify! Positivesof LSS Approach 1. Compatible with all FEM packages 2. Highly reproducible results (but not necessarily with experiment!) 3. Has served industry for almost 40 years 4. Expandable to account for strain hardening/softening, creep-fatigue interaction, etc 5. Constants determined by standard testing practice (ASTM E606): E, K’, n’, b, c, ef’, sf’
  • 21.
    Innovating to simplify! Negativesof LSS Approach 1. Fails to ‘recognize’ fatigue as a process of fatigue crack growth 2. Shaky rationale under fully elastic conditions – consequence of item 1….
  • 22.
    Innovating to simplify! Mumbai,May 10, 2018 Part 2: The Impact of Fracture Mechanics on Structural Integrity R. Sunder, BiSS (P) Ltd Bangalore, India, +91 9880-432322 rs@biss.in 22
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Innovating to simplify! Enginefor Airbus 380 10,000 hrs between inspections…. 24
  • 25.
    Innovating to simplify! Strengthwith defects – Fracture Mechanics Theory: Elliptic stress raiser – /Inglis 1915/ Brittle fracture /Griffiths 1935/ Elasto-Plastic fracture /Irwin 1945/ Ship fractures WWII 25
  • 26.
    Innovating to simplify! Characterizinghow severely a crack is stressed: Stress Intensity Factor Introduced by George Irwin – used as ‘industry standard’by the world from the 1960’s K = Sa .Y s = K / .r K – Stress Intensity Factor (K) Y – crack/specimen geometry correction factor r – distance from crack tip 2a S s 26
  • 27.
    Innovating to simplify! Kc– ‘Toughness’ in the presence of a defect K Kc = Sac .Y Sc = Kc / .ac Kc – Critical Stress Intensity Factor (K) Y – crack/specimen geometry correction factor 27
  • 28.
    Innovating to simplify! TheCompact Tension C(T) Specimen 28
  • 29.
    Innovating to simplify! StressIntensity Factor, K = f (stress, crack size, geometry) • K – the ‘gift’ from Fracture Mechanics helps characterize residual strength and residual life of materials with defects (cracks)
  • 30.
    Innovating to simplify! FractureMechanics – the Platform to Switch to Maintenance on Condition ao ac Inspection period Detectable crack size Service Life “Damage is easier to handle when you can see it grow”
  • 31.
    Innovating to simplify! FractureMechanics & Risk Management 31
  • 32.
    Innovating to simplify! Summary:The Fracture Mechanics “Business Model” – 1970’s onwards K da/dN мм/Cycle K – Stress intensity Factor: Similarity criterion for FM 1. K as a similarity criterion – FEM solutions 2. Test automation for material data generation 3. NDT to set initial crack size 4. Critical crack size driven by fracture toughness (Materials Engg) 5. da/dN curve defining crack kinetics (Modeling) 1 2 3 4 5
  • 33.
    Innovating to simplify! FractureMechanics Application – ‘Local’ and Other Stories 33
  • 34.
    Innovating to simplify! Willit Leak? Or, will it burst?? 34
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Innovating to simplify! J1ctest result for pipe Minimum to qualify Safety margin First published results on J1c testing of pipe with through subject to internal pressure 37
  • 38.
    Innovating to simplify! Boeing747: Fruits of Structural Integrity Assurance In service for 50 years 150,000 hrs+ service – 15-20 TBIs 40,000 t/o, landings ~240,000 km on ground 100,000,000 km 2,500 times around the equator 38
  • 39.
    Innovating to simplify! FiveTasks of ASIP 1. Design Specification 2. Design & Development 3. Full-Scale Testing 4. Fleet Management Data 5. Fleet Management to Retirement
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
    Innovating to simplify! LoadSpectrum Correction for Composite Structures
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
    Innovating to simplify! HighPerformance and Precision – Delivered Worldwide! SUMMARY • Design is not merely to ensure functionality on Day #1: It is about long term safe and economical operations • Life-cycle outlook for nuclear installations extends to 25-40 years. Service loads and environmental factors change material and structural behavior • Design and condition monitoring address issues related to Fatigue, Fracture, Creep and Corrosion • Rigorous analysis based on reproducible material data, supported by testing and periodic inspection and maintenance determine long-term safety and economy of operations
  • 49.
    Innovating to simplify! 2017– Silver Jubilee Year Thank you! Questions?? rs@biss.in 49