The document discusses the standard views and assessment criteria for cervical spine X-rays. The standard views are lateral, anterior-posterior (AP), and open-mouth. Additional views like swimmer's view may be needed if parts of the cervical spine are not visible. When assessing the X-rays, examiners should evaluate the alignment of bony structures, look for fractures or abnormalities in the bones and cartilage, check for disc issues, and examine the prevertebral soft tissues for swelling or hemorrhage. A systematic approach is recommended to thoroughly review the X-rays according to these standardized guidelines.
This document provides an overview of cervical spine radiography and common cervical spine fractures. It begins with an anatomical description of the cervical vertebrae and positioning for standard anterior-posterior and lateral cervical spine views. Common fractures discussed include Jefferson fractures, hangman's fractures, clay shoveler's fractures, and odontoid fractures. Flexion teardrop fractures and anterior subluxations are also summarized. The document emphasizes radiographic features that help characterize each type of cervical spine injury.
Cervical spine trauma can range from minor ligament injuries to spinal cord injuries. The cervical spine is commonly injured, with the most common mechanisms being falls and motor vehicle accidents. Common fractures include odontoid fractures of C2, hangman's fractures involving the pars interarticularis of C2, and flexion-extension teardrop fractures of the lower cervical vertebrae. Computed tomography is useful for evaluation of cervical spine injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging can help identify ligamentous injuries when other studies are negative. Treatment depends on the stability of the injury, with unstable injuries requiring immobilization.
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial TraumaHimanshu Soni
This document discusses cervical spine radiography for evaluating maxillofacial trauma. It outlines the indications for cervical spine x-rays, including neck pain, altered mental status, intoxication, focal neurological deficits or complaints, and distracting injuries. The recommended views are a three-view series including cross-table lateral, anteroposterior, and open-mouth odontoid views. Each view is described in detail, focusing on evaluating alignment, bones, cartilage, and soft tissues for abnormalities that could indicate injuries like fractures or dislocations. The document emphasizes that all three views are needed to thoroughly assess the cervical spine following trauma.
This document discusses the radiographic anatomy and positioning of the cervical spine. It begins with an overview of cervical spine anatomy, including the typical and atypical cervical vertebrae. It then covers radiographic projections of the cervical spine including AP, lateral, oblique, and odontoid views. Key anatomical structures are identified on these views. The document emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach to interpreting cervical spine radiographs, checking for adequate coverage, alignment, bone structure, disc spacing, and soft tissues. Common fractures and anatomical lines used for measurement are also briefly mentioned.
This document provides guidance on radiographic evaluation of the spine. It discusses cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine radiography, including standard views, systematic evaluation approaches, and normal anatomy. Key points include the importance of clinical assessment in interpreting cervical spine films, and the "three column model" for assessing thoracolumbar spine stability based on which vertebral columns are injured. Detailed systematic approaches are presented to thoroughly evaluate spine radiographs for coverage, alignment, bone integrity, disc spacing, soft tissues and image edges.
The document discusses spine radiography and provides guidelines for evaluating cervical and thoracolumbar spine x-rays. It emphasizes using a systematic approach to evaluate coverage, alignment, bones, spacing, soft tissues and image edges. Factors like normal anatomy, fracture patterns and the three-column injury model are reviewed. Clinical assessment is important as some fractures may be missed on x-rays alone. CT may be needed if injury is suspected or x-rays are unclear.
This document provides an overview of orthopedic x-rays, including their purpose and history. It describes x-ray machines and the five densities visible on radiographs. Key orthopedic terminology is defined. Normal anatomy of multiple body regions is shown on radiographs, along with common orthopedic conditions like fractures, infections, arthritis, and tumors. Features to assess on spinal radiographs like vertebral alignment, disc height, and soft tissues are outlined.
This document discusses radiographic views of the cervical spine, including anatomy, projection techniques, and common fractures. It describes the anatomy of cervical vertebrae and the atlas, axis, and C3-C7 vertebrae. Standard radiographic views including AP, lateral, flexion/extension, odontoid, and oblique views are covered. Common fractures discussed include Jefferson fractures, odontoid fractures, Hangman's fractures, flexion teardrop fractures, and Clay shoveler's fractures. Radiographic features of each type of fracture are provided.
This document provides an overview of cervical spine radiography and common cervical spine fractures. It begins with an anatomical description of the cervical vertebrae and positioning for standard anterior-posterior and lateral cervical spine views. Common fractures discussed include Jefferson fractures, hangman's fractures, clay shoveler's fractures, and odontoid fractures. Flexion teardrop fractures and anterior subluxations are also summarized. The document emphasizes radiographic features that help characterize each type of cervical spine injury.
Cervical spine trauma can range from minor ligament injuries to spinal cord injuries. The cervical spine is commonly injured, with the most common mechanisms being falls and motor vehicle accidents. Common fractures include odontoid fractures of C2, hangman's fractures involving the pars interarticularis of C2, and flexion-extension teardrop fractures of the lower cervical vertebrae. Computed tomography is useful for evaluation of cervical spine injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging can help identify ligamentous injuries when other studies are negative. Treatment depends on the stability of the injury, with unstable injuries requiring immobilization.
Cervical Spine Radiograph - MaxilloFacial TraumaHimanshu Soni
This document discusses cervical spine radiography for evaluating maxillofacial trauma. It outlines the indications for cervical spine x-rays, including neck pain, altered mental status, intoxication, focal neurological deficits or complaints, and distracting injuries. The recommended views are a three-view series including cross-table lateral, anteroposterior, and open-mouth odontoid views. Each view is described in detail, focusing on evaluating alignment, bones, cartilage, and soft tissues for abnormalities that could indicate injuries like fractures or dislocations. The document emphasizes that all three views are needed to thoroughly assess the cervical spine following trauma.
This document discusses the radiographic anatomy and positioning of the cervical spine. It begins with an overview of cervical spine anatomy, including the typical and atypical cervical vertebrae. It then covers radiographic projections of the cervical spine including AP, lateral, oblique, and odontoid views. Key anatomical structures are identified on these views. The document emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach to interpreting cervical spine radiographs, checking for adequate coverage, alignment, bone structure, disc spacing, and soft tissues. Common fractures and anatomical lines used for measurement are also briefly mentioned.
This document provides guidance on radiographic evaluation of the spine. It discusses cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine radiography, including standard views, systematic evaluation approaches, and normal anatomy. Key points include the importance of clinical assessment in interpreting cervical spine films, and the "three column model" for assessing thoracolumbar spine stability based on which vertebral columns are injured. Detailed systematic approaches are presented to thoroughly evaluate spine radiographs for coverage, alignment, bone integrity, disc spacing, soft tissues and image edges.
The document discusses spine radiography and provides guidelines for evaluating cervical and thoracolumbar spine x-rays. It emphasizes using a systematic approach to evaluate coverage, alignment, bones, spacing, soft tissues and image edges. Factors like normal anatomy, fracture patterns and the three-column injury model are reviewed. Clinical assessment is important as some fractures may be missed on x-rays alone. CT may be needed if injury is suspected or x-rays are unclear.
This document provides an overview of orthopedic x-rays, including their purpose and history. It describes x-ray machines and the five densities visible on radiographs. Key orthopedic terminology is defined. Normal anatomy of multiple body regions is shown on radiographs, along with common orthopedic conditions like fractures, infections, arthritis, and tumors. Features to assess on spinal radiographs like vertebral alignment, disc height, and soft tissues are outlined.
This document discusses radiographic views of the cervical spine, including anatomy, projection techniques, and common fractures. It describes the anatomy of cervical vertebrae and the atlas, axis, and C3-C7 vertebrae. Standard radiographic views including AP, lateral, flexion/extension, odontoid, and oblique views are covered. Common fractures discussed include Jefferson fractures, odontoid fractures, Hangman's fractures, flexion teardrop fractures, and Clay shoveler's fractures. Radiographic features of each type of fracture are provided.
Radiography clinical updates - session one menkantozz
The document discusses the radiographic critique of a cervical spine x-ray following a road traffic accident. It analyzes the request form, justifies the procedure, discusses optimization of exposure factors, and critiques the radiographic images. The lateral view shows all cervical vertebrae and the C7-T1 junction. The AP view demonstrates the cervical vertebrae and soft tissues of the neck. Both images have sufficient contrast and density to evaluate for fractures or injuries while minimizing radiation exposure to the patient.
This document provides an overview of knee x-ray and MRI examinations. It describes the normal anatomy seen on x-rays and MRI, various imaging projections used for the knee, and common pathologies that can be identified. Key indications for knee x-rays are listed as trauma, suspected osteoarthritis, infection, and to evaluate for fractures or joint effusions. Common fractures discussed include tibial plateau fractures and patellar fractures. The document also provides details on measurements taken from knee x-rays.
Introduction to musculoskeletal radiologySubhanjan Das
Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays in 1895 in Germany. He observed that X-rays could pass through human tissue and cast shadows of bones on photographic plates. In recognition of this groundbreaking discovery, Roentgen received the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. X-rays provide valuable medical imaging by allowing visualization of internal structures in the body.
This document discusses spine imaging and the cervical and thoracolumbar spine. It provides guidelines for systematic evaluation of spine radiographs including coverage, alignment, bones, spacing, soft tissues and image edges. Key points covered are clinical considerations for cervical spine imaging, views used, and a three column model for assessing thoracolumbar spine stability based on which columns are injured. Detailed analysis methods are presented for evaluating the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine on radiographs.
The document provides guidance on interpreting x-rays for trauma patients, focusing on the cervical spine, chest, pelvis, maxillofacial region, and wrist/hand. It describes what to look for on each image such as alignment, bone fractures, soft tissue swelling, and anatomical landmarks. Proper visualization and positioning is important to detect injuries and abnormalities like pneumothorax, spine fractures, and bone displacements.
The document discusses various types of cervical spine trauma and injuries that can occur. It describes fractures of the atlas including Jefferson's fracture and posterior arch fractures. Hangman's fractures and teardrop fractures of the axis are also summarized. Odontoid fractures are divided into Types I-III. Vertebral body compression fractures like wedge fractures and burst fractures are mentioned. The document also briefly summarizes clay shoveler's fractures and lamina and transverse process fractures of the cervical spine. Various imaging modalities for evaluating cervical spine injuries are also discussed.
Interpretation of Xrays of the spine.pptxVigny Tsamo
interpretation of the spine xrays, brief anatomy of the back, followed by approach in the interpretation of xray of the cervical spine, then thoracolumbar spine, with common pathologies and their radiological manifestations on xrays.
This document provides an overview of radiographic anatomy of the spine and discusses spine trauma. It begins with defining normal anatomical features visible on spine radiographs, including vertebral bodies, discs, facet joints, and transverse/spinous processes. Common patterns of cervical spine injuries are then described, such as flexion injuries causing compression fractures and facet dislocations. The roles of imaging in spine trauma are outlined as diagnosing fractures, assessing stability, and evaluating neurological involvement. Specific cervical spine views and radiographic signs of trauma are also detailed.
This document provides a detailed overview of cervical spine anatomy and common cervical spine injuries seen on CT imaging. It begins with a description of cervical spine anatomy including the typical vertebrae from C3-C6 and the atypical C1 and C2 vertebrae. It then discusses common cervical spine injuries such as fractures of C1-C2, hangman's fractures of C2, and odontoid fractures. Classification systems for these injuries are provided along with example CT images. The document concludes with a brief discussion of subaxial cervical spine injuries.
The document discusses cervical spine (C spine) injuries. It covers anatomy of the C spine including the atlas and axis vertebrae. It describes the three column concept for spinal stability. Imaging of the C spine including normal measurements and views is discussed. The roles of MRI and stretch testing are covered. Neurological assessment including the ASIA scale is explained. Pharmacological management including methylprednisolone is summarized. Neurogenic and spinal shock in spinal cord injuries are briefly defined.
This document evaluates a PA chest x-ray image. It finds that while the image is of diagnostic quality, there are some technical factors that could be improved. Specifically, it notes that the collimation is centered slightly low at T8 instead of the ideal T7 level, and that the patient appears rotated slightly to the right side as their right clavicle and lung field are higher and farther from the spine than the left. The summary provides recommendations to improve patient positioning and centering for future images.
The document discusses various measurements and lines used in chiropractic analysis of cervical and lumbar spine x-rays. In the cervical spine, measurements include the atlantodental interval and retrotracheal/retropharyngeal intervals. Key lines are the cervical gravity line and George's/spinolaminar lines. In the lumbar spine, measurements include the lumbar gravity line and Ulman's line is used to assess for spondylolisthesis. These measurements and lines help evaluate for conditions like trauma, degeneration, inflammation and abnormal spinal alignment.
Pediatric Orthopedic Imaging Case Studies #7 Pediatric Elbow FracturesSean M. Fox
The document provides an overview of commonly encountered pediatric elbow injuries seen in the emergency department setting. It reviews the anatomy and imaging evaluation of pediatric elbow fractures including the supracondylar humerus, radial neck, lateral condyle, and medial epicondyle fractures. Specific radiographic findings that help identify subtle fractures are discussed. Challenges in pediatric elbow imaging related to ossification centers are also covered. The goal is to help emergency physicians accurately diagnose pediatric elbow fractures on radiographs.
This document discusses cervical spine injuries, their classification, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and management. Some key points:
1. Cervical injuries can be caused by traction, direct impact, or indirect forces like flexion, compression, or rotation. Imaging helps classify injuries and assess stability.
2. Unstable injuries with neurological deficits or multiple injuries may require urgent surgical stabilization. Otherwise, initial treatment focuses on immobilization using rigid collars, braces, halo traction, or halo vests.
3. Common injuries include fractures of C1-C2 and the odontoid process. Type II odontoid fractures are prone to displacement and non-union, so may need open reduction and fusion
This document discusses cervical spine injuries, their classification, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and treatment approaches. Some key points:
1. Cervical injuries can be caused by traction, direct impact, or indirect forces like flexion, compression, or rotation. Imaging helps classify injuries and assess stability.
2. Unstable injuries with neurological deficits or multiple injuries may require urgent surgical stabilization. Otherwise, treatment focuses on immobilization, reduction if needed, and rehabilitation.
3. Common injuries include fractures of C1-C2 and the odontoid process. Treatment depends on fracture type and stability but may involve traction, halo vest immobilization, or anterior/posterior fusion.
The document discusses cervical spine anatomy and imaging of cervical spine injuries. It describes the unique characteristics of C1 and C2 vertebrae including their articular surfaces and ligaments. Common cervical spine fractures are described such as flexion teardrop fractures, wedge fractures, hangman's fractures, and odontoid fractures. Imaging views useful for evaluating cervical spine injuries are outlined including lateral, AP, odontoid, and swimmer's views. Findings suggestive of injuries on these views are provided.
This document provides an overview of CT imaging of the cervical spine. It discusses the anatomy of the cervical spine including the typical vertebrae and curves. It describes the techniques used in CT imaging, including positioning the patient and acquiring scans to allow reconstruction in multiple planes. CT is useful for trauma evaluation and detecting fractures. Example images show normal anatomy on CT as well as a burst fracture. The document also provides some basics on lumbar spine and pelvis anatomy.
The cervical spine anatomy is specialized to support the cranium while allowing a large range of motion. C1 (atlas) has no vertebral body and unique articular pillars. C2 (axis) has a dens that is embryologically derived from C1's body. The ligaments of the cervical spine, including the tectorial membrane and transverse ligament, allow for wide range of motion while maintaining stability. Common cervical spine injuries include flexion teardrop fractures from hyperflexion, wedge fractures from compression, hangman's fractures from hyperextension, and Jefferson fractures from axial loading. Odontoid fractures also occur from hyperextension or hyperflexion forces on the neck. Radiographic evaluation of
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.
TEST BANK For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by...Donc Test
TEST BANK For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler, Verified Chapters 1 - 33, Complete Newest Version Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler, Verified Chapters 1 - 33, Complete Newest Version Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition TEST BANK by Stamler Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Chapters Download Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Study Guide Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Questions and Answers Quizlet Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Studocu Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Quizlet Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Chapters Download Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Download Course Hero Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Answers Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Ebook Download Course hero Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Questions and Answers Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Studocu Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Pdf Chapters Download Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Pdf Download Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Study Guide Questions and Answers Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Ebook Download Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Questions Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Studocu Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Stuvia
Radiography clinical updates - session one menkantozz
The document discusses the radiographic critique of a cervical spine x-ray following a road traffic accident. It analyzes the request form, justifies the procedure, discusses optimization of exposure factors, and critiques the radiographic images. The lateral view shows all cervical vertebrae and the C7-T1 junction. The AP view demonstrates the cervical vertebrae and soft tissues of the neck. Both images have sufficient contrast and density to evaluate for fractures or injuries while minimizing radiation exposure to the patient.
This document provides an overview of knee x-ray and MRI examinations. It describes the normal anatomy seen on x-rays and MRI, various imaging projections used for the knee, and common pathologies that can be identified. Key indications for knee x-rays are listed as trauma, suspected osteoarthritis, infection, and to evaluate for fractures or joint effusions. Common fractures discussed include tibial plateau fractures and patellar fractures. The document also provides details on measurements taken from knee x-rays.
Introduction to musculoskeletal radiologySubhanjan Das
Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays in 1895 in Germany. He observed that X-rays could pass through human tissue and cast shadows of bones on photographic plates. In recognition of this groundbreaking discovery, Roentgen received the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. X-rays provide valuable medical imaging by allowing visualization of internal structures in the body.
This document discusses spine imaging and the cervical and thoracolumbar spine. It provides guidelines for systematic evaluation of spine radiographs including coverage, alignment, bones, spacing, soft tissues and image edges. Key points covered are clinical considerations for cervical spine imaging, views used, and a three column model for assessing thoracolumbar spine stability based on which columns are injured. Detailed analysis methods are presented for evaluating the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine on radiographs.
The document provides guidance on interpreting x-rays for trauma patients, focusing on the cervical spine, chest, pelvis, maxillofacial region, and wrist/hand. It describes what to look for on each image such as alignment, bone fractures, soft tissue swelling, and anatomical landmarks. Proper visualization and positioning is important to detect injuries and abnormalities like pneumothorax, spine fractures, and bone displacements.
The document discusses various types of cervical spine trauma and injuries that can occur. It describes fractures of the atlas including Jefferson's fracture and posterior arch fractures. Hangman's fractures and teardrop fractures of the axis are also summarized. Odontoid fractures are divided into Types I-III. Vertebral body compression fractures like wedge fractures and burst fractures are mentioned. The document also briefly summarizes clay shoveler's fractures and lamina and transverse process fractures of the cervical spine. Various imaging modalities for evaluating cervical spine injuries are also discussed.
Interpretation of Xrays of the spine.pptxVigny Tsamo
interpretation of the spine xrays, brief anatomy of the back, followed by approach in the interpretation of xray of the cervical spine, then thoracolumbar spine, with common pathologies and their radiological manifestations on xrays.
This document provides an overview of radiographic anatomy of the spine and discusses spine trauma. It begins with defining normal anatomical features visible on spine radiographs, including vertebral bodies, discs, facet joints, and transverse/spinous processes. Common patterns of cervical spine injuries are then described, such as flexion injuries causing compression fractures and facet dislocations. The roles of imaging in spine trauma are outlined as diagnosing fractures, assessing stability, and evaluating neurological involvement. Specific cervical spine views and radiographic signs of trauma are also detailed.
This document provides a detailed overview of cervical spine anatomy and common cervical spine injuries seen on CT imaging. It begins with a description of cervical spine anatomy including the typical vertebrae from C3-C6 and the atypical C1 and C2 vertebrae. It then discusses common cervical spine injuries such as fractures of C1-C2, hangman's fractures of C2, and odontoid fractures. Classification systems for these injuries are provided along with example CT images. The document concludes with a brief discussion of subaxial cervical spine injuries.
The document discusses cervical spine (C spine) injuries. It covers anatomy of the C spine including the atlas and axis vertebrae. It describes the three column concept for spinal stability. Imaging of the C spine including normal measurements and views is discussed. The roles of MRI and stretch testing are covered. Neurological assessment including the ASIA scale is explained. Pharmacological management including methylprednisolone is summarized. Neurogenic and spinal shock in spinal cord injuries are briefly defined.
This document evaluates a PA chest x-ray image. It finds that while the image is of diagnostic quality, there are some technical factors that could be improved. Specifically, it notes that the collimation is centered slightly low at T8 instead of the ideal T7 level, and that the patient appears rotated slightly to the right side as their right clavicle and lung field are higher and farther from the spine than the left. The summary provides recommendations to improve patient positioning and centering for future images.
The document discusses various measurements and lines used in chiropractic analysis of cervical and lumbar spine x-rays. In the cervical spine, measurements include the atlantodental interval and retrotracheal/retropharyngeal intervals. Key lines are the cervical gravity line and George's/spinolaminar lines. In the lumbar spine, measurements include the lumbar gravity line and Ulman's line is used to assess for spondylolisthesis. These measurements and lines help evaluate for conditions like trauma, degeneration, inflammation and abnormal spinal alignment.
Pediatric Orthopedic Imaging Case Studies #7 Pediatric Elbow FracturesSean M. Fox
The document provides an overview of commonly encountered pediatric elbow injuries seen in the emergency department setting. It reviews the anatomy and imaging evaluation of pediatric elbow fractures including the supracondylar humerus, radial neck, lateral condyle, and medial epicondyle fractures. Specific radiographic findings that help identify subtle fractures are discussed. Challenges in pediatric elbow imaging related to ossification centers are also covered. The goal is to help emergency physicians accurately diagnose pediatric elbow fractures on radiographs.
This document discusses cervical spine injuries, their classification, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and management. Some key points:
1. Cervical injuries can be caused by traction, direct impact, or indirect forces like flexion, compression, or rotation. Imaging helps classify injuries and assess stability.
2. Unstable injuries with neurological deficits or multiple injuries may require urgent surgical stabilization. Otherwise, initial treatment focuses on immobilization using rigid collars, braces, halo traction, or halo vests.
3. Common injuries include fractures of C1-C2 and the odontoid process. Type II odontoid fractures are prone to displacement and non-union, so may need open reduction and fusion
This document discusses cervical spine injuries, their classification, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and treatment approaches. Some key points:
1. Cervical injuries can be caused by traction, direct impact, or indirect forces like flexion, compression, or rotation. Imaging helps classify injuries and assess stability.
2. Unstable injuries with neurological deficits or multiple injuries may require urgent surgical stabilization. Otherwise, treatment focuses on immobilization, reduction if needed, and rehabilitation.
3. Common injuries include fractures of C1-C2 and the odontoid process. Treatment depends on fracture type and stability but may involve traction, halo vest immobilization, or anterior/posterior fusion.
The document discusses cervical spine anatomy and imaging of cervical spine injuries. It describes the unique characteristics of C1 and C2 vertebrae including their articular surfaces and ligaments. Common cervical spine fractures are described such as flexion teardrop fractures, wedge fractures, hangman's fractures, and odontoid fractures. Imaging views useful for evaluating cervical spine injuries are outlined including lateral, AP, odontoid, and swimmer's views. Findings suggestive of injuries on these views are provided.
This document provides an overview of CT imaging of the cervical spine. It discusses the anatomy of the cervical spine including the typical vertebrae and curves. It describes the techniques used in CT imaging, including positioning the patient and acquiring scans to allow reconstruction in multiple planes. CT is useful for trauma evaluation and detecting fractures. Example images show normal anatomy on CT as well as a burst fracture. The document also provides some basics on lumbar spine and pelvis anatomy.
The cervical spine anatomy is specialized to support the cranium while allowing a large range of motion. C1 (atlas) has no vertebral body and unique articular pillars. C2 (axis) has a dens that is embryologically derived from C1's body. The ligaments of the cervical spine, including the tectorial membrane and transverse ligament, allow for wide range of motion while maintaining stability. Common cervical spine injuries include flexion teardrop fractures from hyperflexion, wedge fractures from compression, hangman's fractures from hyperextension, and Jefferson fractures from axial loading. Odontoid fractures also occur from hyperextension or hyperflexion forces on the neck. Radiographic evaluation of
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.
TEST BANK For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by...Donc Test
TEST BANK For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler, Verified Chapters 1 - 33, Complete Newest Version Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler, Verified Chapters 1 - 33, Complete Newest Version Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition TEST BANK by Stamler Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Chapters Download Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Study Guide Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Questions and Answers Quizlet Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Studocu Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Quizlet Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Chapters Download Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Download Course Hero Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Answers Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Ebook Download Course hero Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Questions and Answers Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Studocu Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Pdf Chapters Download Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Pdf Download Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Study Guide Questions and Answers Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Ebook Download Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Questions Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Studocu Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Stuvia
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Here is the updated list of Top Best Ayurvedic medicine for Gas and Indigestion and those are Gas-O-Go Syp for Dyspepsia | Lavizyme Syrup for Acidity | Yumzyme Hepatoprotective Capsules etc
Integrating Ayurveda into Parkinson’s Management: A Holistic ApproachAyurveda ForAll
Explore the benefits of combining Ayurveda with conventional Parkinson's treatments. Learn how a holistic approach can manage symptoms, enhance well-being, and balance body energies. Discover the steps to safely integrate Ayurvedic practices into your Parkinson’s care plan, including expert guidance on diet, herbal remedies, and lifestyle modifications.
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotesPsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kol...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Versio
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
2. Standard views
3 view standar adalah :
• Lateral, Anterior-Posterior (AP) dan Odontoid (atau tampilan Open
Mouth), saat situasi trauma, view ini mungkin sulit diperoleh karena
pasien mungkin kesakitan, bingung, tidak sadar, atau tidak dapat
bekerja sama karena alat imobilisasi.
View tambahan
• Jika view lateral tidak dapat terlihat hingga T1 maka foto diulang
dengan lengan diturunkan atau biasa disebut ‘Swimmers view’.
5. Adekuat
• The standard 3 view plain film series is the lateral, antero-posterior,
and open-mouth view
• The lateral cervical spine film must include the base of the occiput
and the top of the first thoracic vertebra
• The lateral view alone is inadequate and will miss up to 15% of
cervical spine injuries.
• If the lower cervical spine is not visible, a CT scan of the region is then
indicated
6. Alignment
• There are multiple lines you need to assess across each of the three
radiograph views which should run uninterrupted in healthy
individuals.
8. Lateral View
The anterior longitudinal line runs along the anterior
surface of the vertebral bodies.
The posterior longitudinal line runs along the
posterior surface of the vertebral bodies.
The spinolaminar line runs along the anterior edge
of the spinous processes (at the junction of the
spinous process and the laminae).
9. • Anterior subluxation of one
vertebra on another indicates
facet dislocation
• Less than 50% of the width of a
vertebral body implies unifacet
dislocation
• Greater than 50% implies
bilateral facet dislocation
• This is usually accompanied by
widening of the interspinous and
interlaminar spaces
10.
11. AP View
The two lateral lines of the AP view
run down either side of the vertebral
bodies (represented by the yellow
lines in the image below).
The spinous process line runs down
through each spinous process from
C1 to C7 (represented by the blue
line in the image below).
12. Odontoid View
The odontoid/open-mouth view has several intersecting lines which are sometimes referred to as a “meeting of corners”.
Irregularities in the areas where these lines intersect may indicate misalignment of the lateral masses of C1 and C2 (e.g.
fracture, dislocation).
You can also use this view to assess the odontoid peg to make sure it is aligned with the lateral masses of C1. To do this,
inspect and compare the space between the peg and the lateral mass of C1 on each side. Asymmetry of the space
between the peg and the lateral mass of C1 may indicate fracture or dislocation of the odontoid peg.
13. • The open mouth view should visualise
the lateral masses of C1 and the entire
odontoid peg
• Bite blocks may improve viewing
• In the unconscious, intubated patient
the open mouth view is inadequate and
occiput to C2 CT scan is recommended
14. • This is usually the second standard view
obtained in the emergency department. The
main goal is to picture the odontoid process
of the C2 and the C1. It can be done with the
mouth either open or closed. Two things are
assessed when inspecting the odontoid x-
ray: the distance between the odontoid
process and the lateral masses of the C1
should be equal. If not, the inequality may
be due to a slight rotation of the head.
Secondly, and considering the previous
point, the margins of C1 and C2 should
remain aligned (Figure 10).
15. Predental space
• Figure 6: Predental space, the distance
between the anterior surface of the odontoid
process and posterior aspect of the anterior
ring of C1, in adult, it should not exceed 3
mm, or 5 mm in children.
16. Swimmer view
• This is an oblique view which projects
the humeral heads away from the C-
spine. A swimmer's view may be useful
in assessing alignment at the cervico-
thoracic junction if C7/T1 has not been
adequately viewed on the lateral image,
or on a repeated lateral image with the
shoulders lowered.
• The view is difficult to achieve, and
often difficult to interpret. If plain X-ray
imaging of the cervico-thoracic junction
is limited then CT may be required.
17. B. Bones
• In all three of the previously discussed views, you should carefully
inspect the cortex (outer white edge) of each bone in turn, making
sure you are systematic (e.g. top to bottom) in your approach. A
common pitfall is to stop searching once you have found one
abnormality. If an abnormality is identified, you should note it and
then continue to follow your systematic approach until all relevant
bones have been assessed.
18. • Vertebral body and intervertebral
disc examination reveal compression
and burst type injuries
• Bodies normally regular cuboids
similar in size and shape to the
vertebrae immediately above and
below (not C1/C2)
• Anterior wedging of vertebral body
or teardrop fractures of antero-
inferior portion of body implies
compression fracture
19. • Loss of height of an intervertebral disc space may indicate disc
herniation
• Analysis of prevertebral soft tissues may allow the diagnosis of
cervical injuries
• Soft tissue shadow is created by pharyngeal and prevertebral tissues
20. • Bone: Watch for a normal bony outline of the vertebras and bone
density. Subtle changes in bone density should be noted, as it may
indicate a compression fracture. Areas with decreased bone density
which may be found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,
osteoporosis or metastatic osteolytic lesions, are more prone to
breaking under stress. Acute compression fractures of the above-
mentioned changes show as areas of increased bone density (Figure
7).
21.
22. Cartilage
Intervertebral discs should be roughly similar in height throughout the
cervical spine, with no obvious loss of height at any point in the disc.
However, if you suspect disc pathology (e.g disc herniation) from the
history/examination (cervical radiculopathy with sensory/motor
disturbance at a certain spinal level), this often wouldn’t be clearly
seen on a cervical spine X-ray and would be better investigated with an
MRI scan.
23. Cartilage space assessment
• Inspection of a good quality lateral view x-ray in a healthy person
should show uniform intervertebral spaces. (Figure 8).
26. • Pre-vertebral (i.e the area directly anterior to the vertebral
bodies) soft tissue is best assessed using a lateral view. Soft tissue
appears as a light grey opacity on cervical spine X-rays, located
between the vertebral bodies and the darker-grey area that
represents the trachea. Any widening of this space may represent
a pre-vertebral haematoma and should significantly raise suspicion of
a cervical fracture. It should be noted that this area naturally gets
wider around the level of C4 so two different acceptable widths are
used:
27. • above C4 the pre-vertebral soft tissue should be no larger than one-
third of the adjacent vertebral body in width.
• from C4 onwards the pre-vertebral soft tissue should be no larger
than the width of one whole vertebral body.
• If a lateral cervical spine X-ray has been requested for another
indication (e.g. suspected foreign body in the trachea) you should
make sure you include these other structures in your assessment of
the radiograph.
28.
29. Soft tissue
• The prevertebral soft tissues can be used
as an indicator of an acute swelling or
hemorrhage resulting from an injury, and
may sometimes be the only indicator of
an acute injury on an x-ray. The normal
width of the prevertebral tissue
decreases down from C1 to C4 and
increases from C4 downwards. Normal
measurements from C1 to C4 are less
than 7 mm (less than half of the vertebral
body at this level), and less than 22 mm
below the C5 (less than the vertebral
body at this level) see Figure 9. Air within
soft tissue could suggest rupture of the
esophagus or trachea.
3 tampilan standar adalah - Tampilan lateral - Tampilan Anterior-Posterior (AP) - dan tampilan Pasak Odontoid (atau tampilan Mulut Terbuka). Dalam konteks trauma, gambaran-gambaran ini sulit diperoleh karena pasien mungkin kesakitan, bingung, tidak sadar, atau tidak dapat bekerja sama karena perangkat imobilisasi.
Tampilan tambahan
Jika pandangan lateral tidak menunjukkan tulang belakang ke T1 maka pandangan berulang dengan lengan diturunkan atau 'pandangan Perenang' mungkin diperlukan.
Tampilan samping
Tampilan lateral sering kali merupakan gambar yang paling informatif. Penilaian membutuhkan pendekatan yang sistematis.
Thevertebraeshouldalwaysbecountedslowly,andthebodiesshould be looked at as one proceeds from top to bottom. One should count a second time when looking at posterior elements from top to bottom on lateral film.It should be checked that the alignment is in order.To do this, one should draw an imaginary line joining the anterior aspects of the vertebral bodies (anterior body line), the posterior aspects of the bodies (posterior body line), and the line joining the short interfaces where the spinous processes join the laminae posteriorly (spinolaminar line). All these lines should curve gently and gradually in a slight lordotic config- uration. The upper spinolaminar line (posterior spinal line) is extended from C1 to C3, and the anterior aspect of the spinous process of C2 should not be displaced (by more than 2 mm, with a straight line nor- mally formed joining the anterior aspects of the spinous processes of C1, C2, and C3. An apparent slight subluxation may occur in pre-teenage years, with a grade I shift (less than one quarter of vertebral body shift) occurring as a normal variant (pseudosubluxation; anterior shift of C2 on C3).
The anterior vertebral line, posterior vertebral line, and spinolaminar line should have a smooth curve with no steps or discontinuities
Malalignment of the posterior vertebral bodies is more significant than that anteriorly, which may be due to rotation
A step of >3.5mm is significant anywhere
On the AP radiograph, alignment of the spinous processes should be checked. Malalignment with, for example, the top four aligned to the left of the midline and the remainder in a straight line in the midline indi- cates a locked facet situation at that level. (Sometimes only one half of a bifid spinous process may be visible and thus a locked facet may be sim- ulated, though alignment above and below will be unaffected). The un- dulated outline of the lateral masses of the mid and lower cervical spine should be uninterrupted by a fracture or displacement on the AP view.
The open-mouth view is the best projection for excluding a possible odontoid peg fracture, but sometimes CT may be required for confirma- tion. The occipito-atlantal and atlantoaxial articulations should also be assessed, and the two sides should be symmetrical. The lateral aspects of C1 and C2 should be perfectly aligned. This relationship will be dis- turbed when the patient is rotated (but still within normal limits), but is definitely abnormal when compression and splaying of the body of C1 occurs (Jefferson’s fracture), with the lateral masses of C1 lateral to the lateral masses of C2 on the open-mouth view.
Theindividualelementsshouldbeexaminedcarefully:bodies,pedicles, facet joints, laminae, spinous processes, and disc spaces. (Note that un- covertebral joints overlying disc spaces, and transverse processes superimposed on posterior parts of vertebral bodies may simulate bony injuries). The disc spaces should be carefully examined for narrowing (usually due to pre-existing degenerative disease) or widening which may be part of a serious hyperextension injury, may be subtle, but will be associated with local precervical soft tissue swelling. The localized narrowing of a disc space anteriorly or posteriorly should also be re- garded with suspicion and other signs should be sought.
Figure 7: Watch for a non-disrupted bony outline. Disruption, as in the above examples means fracture of the bone structure. Also search for any hypo- or hyper-dense areas in the bone, as it may be the only indication of the compression fracture. In (A) slight widening of the soft tissue is visible just in front of the fracture, under the white arrow, which may indicate that this is an acute injury
Figure 8: Uniform intervertebral cartilage spaces, also facet joints must be inspected, for any unusual alignment or increased space.
An emergency physician may diagnose subluxations and dislocations of the facet joints through the assessment of cartilage space between corpora of vertebrae, facet joints, and space between spinous processes. Increased interspinous distance by more than 50% suggests a ligamentous injury and the protective muscle spasm may make the interpretation difficult.
Aprecervicalsofttissueswelling,whichmaybelocalizedorgeneralized, should be excluded. In the upper cervical spine, the precervical soft tis- sue thickness should not exceed 7 mm at the anteroinferior aspect of C2 and should not exceed an AP vertebral body width or 21 mm at lower cervical-spine level. (As elsewhere in radiology, measurements do have their limitations and a soft tissue thickness of more than 7 mm may be seen at the C2 level in large or obese patients. In a small patient a meas- urement of 7 mm may even be abnormal and injury may still be present).
Afterthebonypartsofthecervicalspinehavebeenexaminedonthe various projections, certain other areas should be reviewed, and these include the following:
Parts of the mandible may be visible, and mandibular fractures may be associated with cervical-spine injuries.The pituitary fossa, which may be included on the lateral radiograph, should always be looked at.
An air fluid level in the sphenoid sinus would suggest a base of skull fracture and CT would be indicated for further evaluation; air fluid lev- els in the maxillary antra would suggest facial bone injury (note that concomitant sinusitis, a common and often incidental condition, may also cause air fluid levels).
Foreign material in soft tissues should be excluded.The endotracheal tube and nasogastric tube may be visible and mal- position and/or complications should be noted.Soft tissue haematoma with tracheal deviation may be noted. Surgical emphysema along fascial planes may be due to local trauma or associated with pneumomediastinum.Signs of concomitant chest trauma (such as signs of aortic rupture or pneumothorax) may be noted on the AP cervical-spine radiograph.
C-spine systematic approach - Normal Lateral 1
Coverage - All vertebrae are visible from the skull base to the top of T2 (T1 is considered adequate)
- If T1 is not visible then a repeat image with the patient's shoulders lowered or a 'swimmer's' view may be necessary
Alignment - Check the Anterior line (the line of the anterior longitudinal ligament), the Posterior line (the line of the posterior longitudinal ligament), and the Spinolaminar line (the line formed by the anterior edge of the spinous processes - extends from inner edge of skull)
- GREEN = Anterior line
- ORANGE = Posterior line
- RED = Spinolaminar line
Bone - Trace the cortical outline of all the bones to check for fractures
Note: The spinal cord (not visible) lies between the posterior and spinolaminar lines
C-spine systematic approach - Normal Lateral 2
Disc spaces - The vertebral bodies are spaced apart by the intervertebral discs - not directly visible with X-rays. These spaces should be approximately equal in height
Pre-vertebral soft tissue - Some fractures cause widening of the pre-vertebral soft tissue due to pre-vertebral haematoma
- Normal pre-vertebral soft tissue (asterisks) - narrow down to C4 and wider below
- Above C4 ≤ 1/3rd vertebral body width
- Below C4 ≤ 100% vertebral body width
Note: Not all C-spine fractures are accompanied by pre-vertebral haematoma - lack of pre-vertebral soft tissue thickening should NOT be taken as reassuring
Edge of image - Check other visible structures
C-spine normal anatomy - Lateral (detail)
Bone - The cortical outline is not always well defined but forcing your eye around the edge of all the bones will help you identify fractures
C2 Bone Ring - At C2 (Axis) the lateral masses viewed side on form a ring of corticated bone (red ring)
This ring is not complete in all subjects and may appear as a double ring
A fracture is sometimes seen as a step in the ring outline
C-spine systematic approach - Normal AP
Coverage - The AP view should cover the whole C-spine and the upper thoracic spine
Alignment - The lateral edges of the C-spine are aligned (red lines )
Bone - Fractures are often less clearly visible on this view than on the lateral
Spacing - The spinous processes (orange) are in a straight line and spaced approximately evenly
Soft tissues - Check for surgical emphysema
Edges of image - Check for injury to the upper ribs and the lung apices for pneumothorax
C-spine normal anatomy - Open mouth view
This view is considered adequate if it shows the alignment of the lateral processes of C1 and C2 (red circles)
The distance between the peg and the lateral masses of C1 (asterisks) should be equal on each side
Note: In this image the odontoid peg is fully visible which is not often achievable in the context of trauma due to difficulty in patient positioning
C-spine normal anatomy - ' Swimmer's' view
Oblique image with the humeral heads projected away from the C-spine
The cervico-thoracic junction can be seen
Check alignment by carefully matching the corners of each adjacent vertebral body - anteriorly and posteriorly