This presentation has been prepared for the CONCORD Workshop on QUality and Effectiveness held on 6 -7 December 2012. Feel free to copy it, use it, develop your own tools...and just let us know about it. :)
Evaluation and capacity building tools for Czech CSOsInka Pibilova
Czech civil society organisations (CSOs) working in development cooperation, education and humanitarian assistance, associated in the Czech Forum for Development Co-operation (FoRS), launched the FoRS Code on Effectiveness in 2011. This presentation, prepared for the EES 2012 Conference (www.ees2012.org), shows how the Code was used to build CSO capacities in a participatory way, with minimal resources and the help of social media: via DevelopmentCoffee.org and Peer Reviews.
Mutual Peer Reviews between Organisations Inka Pibilova
Mutual Peer Reviews between Organisations based on CSO Development Effectiveness principles have been piloted in 2012 by the Czech Forum for Development Cooperation - FoRS. This presentation for the association IDEAS shows key principles, steps for implementation and lessons learnt. The peer reviews can be used to bring Codes and frameworks alive and to develop capacities of orgaisations.
Presentation given by Dr. Iddo Dror and Zelalem Lema of ILRI during a Humidtropics Capacity Development Workshop on Innovation Platforms, held in Nairobi, Kenya, in April-May 2014.
Presented by Iddo Dror and Zelalem Lema at the CGIAR Research Program on the Humidtropics Capacity Development Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, 29 April–2 May 2014
Evaluation and capacity building tools for Czech CSOsInka Pibilova
Czech civil society organisations (CSOs) working in development cooperation, education and humanitarian assistance, associated in the Czech Forum for Development Co-operation (FoRS), launched the FoRS Code on Effectiveness in 2011. This presentation, prepared for the EES 2012 Conference (www.ees2012.org), shows how the Code was used to build CSO capacities in a participatory way, with minimal resources and the help of social media: via DevelopmentCoffee.org and Peer Reviews.
Mutual Peer Reviews between Organisations Inka Pibilova
Mutual Peer Reviews between Organisations based on CSO Development Effectiveness principles have been piloted in 2012 by the Czech Forum for Development Cooperation - FoRS. This presentation for the association IDEAS shows key principles, steps for implementation and lessons learnt. The peer reviews can be used to bring Codes and frameworks alive and to develop capacities of orgaisations.
Presentation given by Dr. Iddo Dror and Zelalem Lema of ILRI during a Humidtropics Capacity Development Workshop on Innovation Platforms, held in Nairobi, Kenya, in April-May 2014.
Presented by Iddo Dror and Zelalem Lema at the CGIAR Research Program on the Humidtropics Capacity Development Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, 29 April–2 May 2014
Valuing organizational vision in the development of performance measurement f...Fbertrand
Science-based organizations increasingly make use of performance measurement to monitor the achievement of strategic objectives. Approaches to develop performance measurement frameworks are directly aligned with organizations’ strategic vision, competitive environment and their reporting requirements. This presentation will discuss the advantages and limitations of two approaches and potential impacts on the success of framework implementation: 1) a descriptive framework for a provincial research organization developed internally using participatory workshops, and 2) a comparative framework developed for a federal research organization in consultation with international agencies. Key elements to be examined include indicator selection, data availability and validation, descriptive vs. comparative design, financial implications, organizational learning, and strategic decision-making. Both approaches were designed to reflect the organizations’ respective vision and values, both in how the framework was developed as well as in the design of and implementation plan for the proposed framework.
Evaluating an open research project: Benefits and challenges from the ROER4D ...SarahG_SS
Presentation made at the Open Education Global 2017 Conference held at the CTICC from 8-10 March 2017. This presentation looked at the the evaluation of the ROER4D project, a project that is committed to open research. The open approach in the project work informed the evaluation approach used and has highlighted considerations around the ethical sharing of evaluation findings and outputs, including at which stage and with whom. Some of the benefits and challenges of evaluating such an open project are presented.
This presentation and all staff (125+) member conversation by the Bonner Network involved exploring how higher education service programs can incorporate more democratic community engagement. It also shared the evolving model for community partner capacity building and development. This session occurred at the Bonner Foundation's Fall Directors Meeting 2011. For more info see bonnernetwork.pbworks.com
Composition and initiation of agricultural innovation platformsILRI
Presented by Iddo Dror at the SEARCA Forum-workshop on Platforms, Rural Advisory Services, and Knowledge Management: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development, Los Banos, 17-19 May 2016
EU Space Research Program @ Stanford - Burton Lee - How To Find Partners and ...Burton Lee
"Partnering with European Space Organizations: The EU Space Proposal Evaluation & Selection Process”, presented by Burton Lee, Stanford University, July 21 2010
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ...ROER4D
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji and Sarah Goodier
ROER4D Communications and Evaluation Advisors
Presentation for DECI-2 workshop
Cape Town, 4 May 2016
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the R...SarahG_SS
A joint presentation given at the DECI-2 Workshop held in Cape Town on 3-5 May 2016. This presentation briefly outlines the ROER4D project and then briefly explores the evaluation and communications strategy. This presentation also gives feedback to the DECI-2 project on what worked and some sugestions for improvement in their mentoring process of the ROER4D project.
Impacts of Czech cancer-fighting projects in Georgia and Serbia: lessons for ...Inka Pibilova
The goal of the article is to offer lessons learned on how to share what can be considered “transition experience” with countries in the Western Balkans and Eastern Partnership among others, in order to have a real impact on people’s lives. The author concludes that the Czech Republic, and other Visegrad countries, should share transition experience in areas where they have achieved evident progress and gained significant know-how which they are able to share. At the same time, such experience sharing has to be needs-based and complementary to other development efforts in partner countries. Based on the international recognition of the progress of the Czech Republic and on the evidence from two evaluations discussed in the article, women’s cancer prevention and treatment seem to be a great example of a well-chosen transition experience shared with the Czech partner countries of Georgia and Serbia. Yet, for similar projects in the future, it is necessary to reflect on the key local influencing factors; to understand exactly how each project will work and remain flexible throughout the project cycle; to focus on actual impacts and to accept accountability, and finally to practice evidence-based, consistent, long-term advocacy to achieve systemic changes.
Published in the peer-reviewed journal International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, Vol. XXV No. 3-4 | 2016, titled "Is there a shared transitional experience?"
Evaluace českého onkologickéo projektu v Srbsku 2015 Inka Pibilova
Projekt Podpora prevence rakoviny u žen v regionu Šumadija realizovala Charita Česká republika (ČR) a Oaza Sigurnosti v Srbsku v letech 2010 až 2012 jako veřejnou zakázku. Celkové náklady ve výši 10,5 mil. CZK (552 632 USD) financovala Česká rozvojová agentura (ČRA, anglicky CZDA). Od června do října 2015 proběhla externí evaluace projektu, kterou zadalo Ministerstvo zahraničních věcí (MZV, anglicky MFA) a kterou realizoval evaluační tým společnosti Naviga4. Hlavní zjištění a závěry k evaluaci projektu jsou uvedeny v prezentaci. Celá zpráva je k dispozici zde: http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/zahranicni_vztahy/rozvojova_spoluprace/dvoustranna_zrs_cr/evaluace/index.html.
More Related Content
Similar to FoRS Code on Effectiveness, Peer Reviews and Development Coffee
Valuing organizational vision in the development of performance measurement f...Fbertrand
Science-based organizations increasingly make use of performance measurement to monitor the achievement of strategic objectives. Approaches to develop performance measurement frameworks are directly aligned with organizations’ strategic vision, competitive environment and their reporting requirements. This presentation will discuss the advantages and limitations of two approaches and potential impacts on the success of framework implementation: 1) a descriptive framework for a provincial research organization developed internally using participatory workshops, and 2) a comparative framework developed for a federal research organization in consultation with international agencies. Key elements to be examined include indicator selection, data availability and validation, descriptive vs. comparative design, financial implications, organizational learning, and strategic decision-making. Both approaches were designed to reflect the organizations’ respective vision and values, both in how the framework was developed as well as in the design of and implementation plan for the proposed framework.
Evaluating an open research project: Benefits and challenges from the ROER4D ...SarahG_SS
Presentation made at the Open Education Global 2017 Conference held at the CTICC from 8-10 March 2017. This presentation looked at the the evaluation of the ROER4D project, a project that is committed to open research. The open approach in the project work informed the evaluation approach used and has highlighted considerations around the ethical sharing of evaluation findings and outputs, including at which stage and with whom. Some of the benefits and challenges of evaluating such an open project are presented.
This presentation and all staff (125+) member conversation by the Bonner Network involved exploring how higher education service programs can incorporate more democratic community engagement. It also shared the evolving model for community partner capacity building and development. This session occurred at the Bonner Foundation's Fall Directors Meeting 2011. For more info see bonnernetwork.pbworks.com
Composition and initiation of agricultural innovation platformsILRI
Presented by Iddo Dror at the SEARCA Forum-workshop on Platforms, Rural Advisory Services, and Knowledge Management: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development, Los Banos, 17-19 May 2016
EU Space Research Program @ Stanford - Burton Lee - How To Find Partners and ...Burton Lee
"Partnering with European Space Organizations: The EU Space Proposal Evaluation & Selection Process”, presented by Burton Lee, Stanford University, July 21 2010
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ...ROER4D
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji and Sarah Goodier
ROER4D Communications and Evaluation Advisors
Presentation for DECI-2 workshop
Cape Town, 4 May 2016
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the R...SarahG_SS
A joint presentation given at the DECI-2 Workshop held in Cape Town on 3-5 May 2016. This presentation briefly outlines the ROER4D project and then briefly explores the evaluation and communications strategy. This presentation also gives feedback to the DECI-2 project on what worked and some sugestions for improvement in their mentoring process of the ROER4D project.
Impacts of Czech cancer-fighting projects in Georgia and Serbia: lessons for ...Inka Pibilova
The goal of the article is to offer lessons learned on how to share what can be considered “transition experience” with countries in the Western Balkans and Eastern Partnership among others, in order to have a real impact on people’s lives. The author concludes that the Czech Republic, and other Visegrad countries, should share transition experience in areas where they have achieved evident progress and gained significant know-how which they are able to share. At the same time, such experience sharing has to be needs-based and complementary to other development efforts in partner countries. Based on the international recognition of the progress of the Czech Republic and on the evidence from two evaluations discussed in the article, women’s cancer prevention and treatment seem to be a great example of a well-chosen transition experience shared with the Czech partner countries of Georgia and Serbia. Yet, for similar projects in the future, it is necessary to reflect on the key local influencing factors; to understand exactly how each project will work and remain flexible throughout the project cycle; to focus on actual impacts and to accept accountability, and finally to practice evidence-based, consistent, long-term advocacy to achieve systemic changes.
Published in the peer-reviewed journal International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, Vol. XXV No. 3-4 | 2016, titled "Is there a shared transitional experience?"
Evaluace českého onkologickéo projektu v Srbsku 2015 Inka Pibilova
Projekt Podpora prevence rakoviny u žen v regionu Šumadija realizovala Charita Česká republika (ČR) a Oaza Sigurnosti v Srbsku v letech 2010 až 2012 jako veřejnou zakázku. Celkové náklady ve výši 10,5 mil. CZK (552 632 USD) financovala Česká rozvojová agentura (ČRA, anglicky CZDA). Od června do října 2015 proběhla externí evaluace projektu, kterou zadalo Ministerstvo zahraničních věcí (MZV, anglicky MFA) a kterou realizoval evaluační tým společnosti Naviga4. Hlavní zjištění a závěry k evaluaci projektu jsou uvedeny v prezentaci. Celá zpráva je k dispozici zde: http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/zahranicni_vztahy/rozvojova_spoluprace/dvoustranna_zrs_cr/evaluace/index.html.
Participativní plánování, monitoring a evaluaceInka Pibilova
Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation workshop for education, development and humanitarian Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) associated in FoRS
Monitoring zamereny na vysledky a evaluace Inka Pibilova
This is a presentation from workshop on results-oriented monitoring and evaluation of Czech development cooperation projects. The workshop was held primarily for the Czech Development Agency by the Czech Evaluation Society.
Please mention the source if you plan to share any slides further. Thank you.
How European Civil Society Organisations Strive for their Development Effecti...Inka Pibilova
This brief provides a short overview of key global and European initiatives on Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) Development Effectiveness and mentions key challenges. Further, it shows concrete examples of how European CSOs have put the Istanbul Principles into practice since 2011. It serves as one of the inputs for the High Level Meeting in Mexico in April 2014, focusing on progress in development effectiveness since Busan. It will also serve as a basis for subsequent work on CSO development effectiveness in European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development - CONCORD and the CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness (CPDE).
How European CSOs strive for their development effectivenessInka Pibilova
Examples how European civil society organisations implemented Istanbul principles and enhanced transprancy, partnership and others. Presented on behalf of CONCORD Europe at the CSO Forum in Mexico on 14 April 2014 organised by the CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness... ahead of the High Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation.
Prevence přenosu HIV z matek na děti v KeniInka Pibilova
Evaluace projektu Magny Deti v núdzi. Díky komplexní zdravotní a psychosociální péči se snížil přenos HIV/AIDS z matek na děti z asi 25 - 50 % na přibližně 5 %.
Kompletní evaluační zpráva je k dispozici na http://www.evaluace.com/portfolio-item/prevence-prenosu-hiv-z-matek-na-deti-v-keni/?lang=cs.
Evaluation of a project on HIV transmission from mothers to children in Kenya by Magna Children at Risk. Thanks to complex health and psychosocial support, the transmission from mothers with HIV/AIDS to their children reduced from about 25 - 50 % to around 5 %.
Introduction to project evaluations for SLOGA / TrialogInka Pibilova
This is a presentation form the workshop Introduction to project evaluations for SLOGA / Trialog held on 10 February 2014. It aimed at project managers who are involved in development education, awareness raising or develoment cooperation, to think how evaluations can work for them and what are the necessary steps to start...internal or external evaluations. Be ready for a follow-up! :)
Using Istanbul CSO Development Effectiveness Principles to evaluate a health ...Inka Pibilova
This presentation shows how Istanbul CSO Development Effectiveness Principles can be used to evaluate a health project in Georgia. The full evaluation report as per OECD / DAC criteria is available here in English and Czech: http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/zahranicni_vztahy/rozvojova_spoluprace/dvoustranna_zrs_cr/evaluace/evaluacni_zpravy/evaluacni_zprava_gruzie_zdravotnictvi_1.html
How to plan EC-funded projects? find a compilation of a presentation, handouts and additional tips from a workshop for civil society organisations held in Bratislava on 4 June 2013.
Pribehy nejvetsich zmen v ramci evaluace projektu v indiiInka Pibilova
Prezentace v konference České evaluační společnosti 2013 o tom, jak metoda nejvýznamnějších změn může odkrýt i neočekávané dopady a zjistit hodnoty zapojených lidí.
Poučení z evaluací vzdělávacích projektůInka Pibilova
Poučení z evaluací globálních vzdělávacích projektů a programů českých nevládních neziskových organizací realizovaných v ČR i zahraničí. Evaluace proběhly zejména v roce 2012.
Evaluace projektu prevence a léčby HIV v KeniInka Pibilova
Příklad evaluace projektu neziskové organizace z workshopu Jak mohou neziskové organizace a akademická sféra pomoci realizovat efektivnější projekty (aneb evaluace v teorii a zejména v praxi) v rámci konference Věda v akci 25. 10. 2012
---------------------
An example of an NGO project evaluation from the workshop How can NGOs and universities help to implement more ffective projects (evaluations in theory and practice), held as a part of the conference Science in Action on 25 October 2012.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
FoRS Code on Effectiveness, Peer Reviews and Development Coffee
1. Workshop on Quality and Effectiveness,
Brussels 6 - 7 December 2012
Building capacities of Czech
development CSOs based on the
FoRS Code on Effectiveness
Inka Píbilová
inka@evaluace.com
3. Code on Effectiveness *2011
1. Grassroots knowledge
2. Transparency and accountability
3. Partnership
4. Respect to human rights and gender equality
5. Accountability for impacts and their sustainability
www.FoRS.cz > Members and Observers > FoRS Code in EN
http://www.fors.cz/user_files/fors_code_on_effectiveness_en.pdf
4. Code on Effectiveness – Example:
http://www.fors.cz/user_files/fors_code_on_effectiveness_en.pdf
5. Code on Effectiveness Annual Selfevaluation
1. Grassroots knowledge
Validating data in the field ! Publish strategic priorities online
! Contribute to FoRS working groups
2. Transparency and accountability
Most info incl. contacts on-line ! Publish funding / financial info
Refusing corruption in fundraising
3. Partnership
Mutual capacity building ! Sharing project docs, other projects
4. Respect to human rights and gender equality
Avoiding stereotypes
Not using pictures of extreme suffering for fundraising
5. Accountability for impacts and their sustainability
! Impact indicators missing ! Lack of participatory evaluations
! lack of target groups´ opinions in eval. reports ! Accountability for impacts!
6. Code on Effectiveness Annual Selfevaluation
• How to make assessment more
objective?
• How to build capacities of CSOs
beside workshops? Development
• How to enhance sharing expertise Coffee
of the platform members?
• How to involve small, volunteer-
based organisations, with highly
limited resources? Peer Reviews
• How to promote the guidelines
beyond the platform?
• … And how to do it with minimum
costs?
9. DevelopmentCoffee.org
Themes:
•How can NGOs and companies work together on poverty
reduction around the world?
•What are the stereotypes in development cooperation?
•How to ensure positive impacts of projects?
•What are the new trends in development cooperation? (social
media)
Speakers:
•Leading Czech development CSOs
•Business Platform for Development Cooperation
•Vodafone Foundation Czech Republic or
•Globalisation Monitor from Hongkong
9
10. DevelopmentCoffee.org
Key features:
•Democratic themes proposal and selection (crowdsourcing)
•Use of social media, but regular meetings are essential
•Different hosting organisations
•Informal debate in an atmosphere of trust
•Concrete stories of good / bad practice
•Enhanced networking among CSOs, government officials,
students, private sector
Challenges:
•Ownership of the process after co-founders left
•Need for outputs for wider dissemination
•Need for evaluation of outcomes
10
11. Peer Review – Quick version
DWW Bilateral
peer
review
FoRS Code of
Effectiveness
Self-assessment
11
12. Peer Review – Strategic approach
WG1
Final
Briefing workshop
WG2
ToR & report
WG3
Interested FoRS Code of
Peers Effectiveness
Self-assessment
12
13. Peer Reviews
Key features:
•Concrete objectives
•Based on a framework (FoRS Code on Effectiveness)
•Looking at concrete evidence
•Building on what the organisation is good at
•Voluntary (focus, peers selection)
•Trusted peers with versatile background
•Platform facilitating the process and networking
Challenges:
•Realistic objectives
•Buy-in and dedication across organisational hierarchy
•Sufficient time to discuss the evidence of principles and reach
set objectives.
•„New“ priorities during the peer review process 13
14. Conclusions
Czech CSOs (and others!) are DevelopmentCoffee.org
interested in sharing and and
evaluating their effectiveness,
Peer Reviews
provided they:
• transform the FoRS Code to a
• see benefits for their work,
capacity building rather than
• have a clear framework with
repression tool,
specific, meaningful • use the wide expertise of the
indicators,
FoRS membership,
• own the process, • are quick, easy & cheap to set-
• have sufficient resources to
up and run,
reflect and • use social media, but do not
• are systematically
replace personal contacts,
supported (FoRS Working • are fully driven by target
Group and Secretariat).
groups.
15. Actions for 2013
• Peer reviews among 9 CSOs
• Further implementation of FoRS Code of Effectiveness
• Revitalizing and adding FoRS Working Groups
• Workshops and Summer School on preferred themes
(PM&E, communication)
• Evidence-based analysis of CSOs´ effects and impacts for
Czech policy making
• Involvement in CPDE?
16. Thank you for your attention!
Inka Píbilová (methodology)
inka@evaluace.com www.evaluace.com
Jan Bohm (social media)
me@janbohm.cz www.siriri.org
Daniel Svoboda (CSO development effectiveness)
svoboda@dww.cz www.cso-effectiveness.org
Jana Miléřová (FoRS documentation)
jana.milerova@fors.cz www.fors.cz
Editor's Notes
How to make assessment more objective ? How to build capacities of CSOs beside workshops ? How to enhance sharing expertise of the platform members ? How to involve small, volunteer -based organisations, with highly limited resources? How to promote the guidelines beyond the platform? … And how to do it with minimum costs ? Workshops have been organized by FoRS as per the needs identified. However, only a limited number of CSO representatives could participate due to limited capacities and time constraints. Moreover, it has been realized that workshops and guidelines (such as the Code) are not sufficient to progress on the quality issues. It was identified that innovative solutions were needed to ignite a wider debate on development effectiveness and to foster capacity building among diverse actors, including less formal, often volunteer-based CSOs, individual experts, students as well as companies and state actors. Therefore two new concepts have been launched: (A) DevelopmentCoffee.org and (B) Peer Reviews.
Development Coffee is an informal platform of individuals and organisations interested in development issues. It is a free tool for sharing experiences and discussing common challenges, thus avoiding the same mistakes and learning from successes in order to enhance positive impacts of joint work on people living in poverty and injustice around the world.
Online “crowdsourcing” platform at www.DevelopmentCoffee.org was launched in October 2011. It is used to democratically generate new themes for discussion and to vote for the theme of the next session . Thus anybody from students, to volunteers, to professionals, to journalists, to government officers, to company representatives and general public can propose own theme online and vote for others. FoRS Secretariat ensures that themes relevant to FoRS Code on Effectiveness are proposed and that other themes are linked to relevant principles whenever possible. Beside the website, facebook, e-mail newsletter and on-line FoRS Forum are also used to promote new themes and sessions. Process : Every month, the steering group of FoRS members announces a winning theme and a session date. Further, it appoints speakers and selects a hosting organisation, which is closely related to the selected theme. The Development Coffees are held in the evenings to enable participation of students, volunteers, teachers and others who are usually unavailable for daily workshops. After a 15-minute introduction by speakers who propose their views on the theme and explain relevant links to the Code, an informal, moderated discussion follows among diverse actors. Usually, around 20 participants engage in the debate, which is officially 2 hours long, but transforms to an informal networking event thereafter. Moreover, the news from the Development Coffee currently reach out to more than 400 persons via the above mentioned communication channels.
So far, the Development Coffees covered diverse subjects such as: How can NGOs and companies work together on poverty reduction around the world? What are the stereotypes in development cooperation? How to ensure positive impacts of projects? or What are the new trends in development cooperation? (with a special focus on social media). Speakers included directors and programme managers of leading Czech development CSOs, of the Business Platform for Foreign Development Cooperation, the Vodafone Foundation Czech Republic or the Globalisation Monitor from Hongkong. The evaluation after 9 months of implementation has shown that it is the informal debate that enriches participants ´ views and helps openly share concrete examples of good as well as bad practice. Thus it was proposed to keep the model and encourage new themes generation. Further, it was proposed to generate outputs from each session for wider dissemination and map the outcomes of the debates after a certain time period.
So far, the Development Coffees covered diverse subjects such as: How can NGOs and companies work together on poverty reduction around the world? What are the stereotypes in development cooperation? How to ensure positive impacts of projects? or What are the new trends in development cooperation? (with a special focus on social media). Speakers included directors and programme managers of leading Czech development CSOs, of the Business Platform for Foreign Development Cooperation, the Vodafone Foundation Czech Republic or the Globalisation Monitor from Hongkong. The evaluation after 9 months of implementation has shown that it is the informal debate that enriches participants ´ views and helps openly share concrete examples of good as well as bad practice. Thus it was proposed to keep the model and encourage new themes generation. Further, it was proposed to generate outputs from each session for wider dissemination and map the outcomes of the debates after a certain time period.
Besides annual self-evaluations as the main voluntary principle agreed in the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, the Peer Reviews are strongly recommended in order to increase objectivity of the assessment, to provide valuable external feedback to reviewed organisations and to support mutual learning and capacity building. The Peer Reviews have been inspired by the Global Education Network Europe (GENE) approach and especially by the experience of RORG-network , which introduced Peer Reviews in 2008 as one of the quality-building measures of the development education sector in Norway. The main purpose of RORG-network was to develop a certain degree of common understanding of development education. The lessons learnt, especially the engagement of several experts and focus on the uniqueness and added value of each organisation, in line with the appreciative inquiry approach , have served as a basis for developing a Czech system of development CSO Peer Reviews (FoRS, September 2011). FoRS Peer Reviews allow a structured, in-depth debate on each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness and mutual learning among self-selected peer CSOs. The process is facilitated through FoRS on-line Code of Effectiveness questionnaire, where FoRS members indicate their interest in the Peer Review. The member CSOs can also directly approach concrete peers based on the area they would like to get feedback on, ranging from awareness raising activities, to development interventions in the field, to general management. The sector overview of FoRS Secretariat is often helpful to identify such peers from among the member organisations. Drawing from the Norwegian experience, pilot Peer Reviews were launched by FoRS in cooperation with its member organisation SIRIRI in 2012, whereby five organisations were involved in this pilot phase. During the process, evidence is shared to jointly assess each indicator and draw recommendations for any changes if applicable. Moreover, SIRIRI has used the exercise not only to review each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, but also to get feedback on its overall strategy and ways forward. Other members tested mutual Peer Reviews bilaterally.
Besides annual self-evaluations as the main voluntary principle agreed in the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, the Peer Reviews are strongly recommended in order to increase objectivity of the assessment, to provide valuable external feedback to reviewed organisations and to support mutual learning and capacity building. The Peer Reviews have been inspired by the Global Education Network Europe (GENE) approach and especially by the experience of RORG-network , which introduced Peer Reviews in 2008 as one of the quality-building measures of the development education sector in Norway. The main purpose of RORG-network was to develop a certain degree of common understanding of development education. The lessons learnt, especially the engagement of several experts and focus on the uniqueness and added value of each organisation, in line with the appreciative inquiry approach , have served as a basis for developing a Czech system of development CSO Peer Reviews (FoRS, September 2011). FoRS Peer Reviews allow a structured, in-depth debate on each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness and mutual learning among self-selected peer CSOs. The process is facilitated through FoRS on-line Code of Effectiveness questionnaire, where FoRS members indicate their interest in the Peer Review. The member CSOs can also directly approach concrete peers based on the area they would like to get feedback on, ranging from awareness raising activities, to development interventions in the field, to general management. The sector overview of FoRS Secretariat is often helpful to identify such peers from among the member organisations. Drawing from the Norwegian experience, pilot Peer Reviews were launched by FoRS in cooperation with its member organisation SIRIRI in 2012, whereby five organisations were involved in this pilot phase. During the process, evidence is shared to jointly assess each indicator and draw recommendations for any changes if applicable. Moreover, SIRIRI has used the exercise not only to review each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, but also to get feedback on its overall strategy and ways forward. Other members tested mutual Peer Reviews bilaterally.
The pilot Peer Reviews are yet to be evaluated. However, it is already clear that they require strong dedication and sufficient time to discuss the evidence of principles in practice and successfully reach conclusions. Ownership of the process has to be secured throughout the organisation in order to put recommendations effectively in practice.
The launch of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness has shown that organisations are interested in evaluating their work, provided they own the process, have sufficient time to reflect and are positively encouraged on the way by the FoRS Secretariat and finally the FoRS General Assembly. Specific indicators , such as “FoRS Members and observers refuse displaying and describing extreme suffering for the purpose of obtaining financial recourses for their activities” (FoRS, June 2011), provide a useful basis for debate within the organisations. The indicators set minimal standards acceptable to all organizations. Moreover, it was appreciated that so called key indicators were specified, whereby their serious infringement can lead to the exclusion of the concerned organization from the FoRS platform. However, in order to use the Code mainly as a capacity building rather than repression tool, new concepts beside standard workshops and guidelines have been recently launched by FoRS – the Development Coffee and the Peer Reviews. Taking into account limited resources for capacity building among civil society organisation, both concepts have created new opportunities for promoting, evaluating and sharing experiences on effectiveness principles . Their advantages lie in quick, easy set-up with minimal costs and in capacity building fully driven by target groups . Both use social media for promotion, idea generation and engagement (Development Coffee has been developed based on the free web software www.wordpress.org, the Peer Reviews are facilitated through on-line FoRS Code on Effectiveness Questionnaire, consolidated via free service of www.googledocs.com). Willingness of engaged individuals and organisations to devote certain time to experience sharing and learning is essential to keep both concepts alive. To steer the process, the group of around 5 individuals engaged in FoRS Working Group on CSO Development Effectiveness has proven to be very useful. However, it is crucial that it is the participants, who decide the focus, the timing, the process and the outcomes. FoRS is open to further learn through this process and share the concepts to be utilised by evaluation practitioners, their networks and by any professional platform / network interested in free experience sharing and mutual learning. It is open to any feedback in order to further develop the tools for the benefits of the members, their partners and most of all their beneficiaries.