Forests and
Source Water Protection
Bob Morgan, PhD
Manager of Environmental Quality
Arkansas Forestry Association, 2016
• Regional Water Provider
– Bentonville
– Rogers
– Springdale
– Fayetteville
• 47 Million Gallons/Day
• > 330,000 Customers
• Source; Beaver Lake
Beaver Water District
Mission
To serve our customers’
needs by providing high
quality water that
meets or exceeds all
regulatory
requirements, and is
economically priced
consistent with our
quality standards.
• High quality source
• Source water protection
• Emergency response
• Optimized treatment
• Distribution system
management
• Water quality monitoring
• Educated consumers
Multiple Barriers to Protect Drinking Water
Maintain, safeguard, and/or improve the quality of a given source
AWWA G-300 Source Water Protection
• Greater public health
• Response to uncertainties
• Avoiding costs
• Improved compliance
• Customer expectations
• Bond rating
• Funding opportunities
Source Water Protection
Beaver Lake Watershed
Benefit of Forests
Implementing SWP is a Good Value
• The net present value is
$125 million
• The benefit-cost ratio is
1.4
• The internal rate of
return is 18%
Cadmus study 2016
Index of Forest Importance to Drinking Water
Forests and Source Water Protection | Dr. Bob Morgan

Forests and Source Water Protection | Dr. Bob Morgan

  • 1.
    Forests and Source WaterProtection Bob Morgan, PhD Manager of Environmental Quality Arkansas Forestry Association, 2016
  • 2.
    • Regional WaterProvider – Bentonville – Rogers – Springdale – Fayetteville • 47 Million Gallons/Day • > 330,000 Customers • Source; Beaver Lake Beaver Water District
  • 3.
    Mission To serve ourcustomers’ needs by providing high quality water that meets or exceeds all regulatory requirements, and is economically priced consistent with our quality standards.
  • 4.
    • High qualitysource • Source water protection • Emergency response • Optimized treatment • Distribution system management • Water quality monitoring • Educated consumers Multiple Barriers to Protect Drinking Water
  • 5.
    Maintain, safeguard, and/orimprove the quality of a given source AWWA G-300 Source Water Protection • Greater public health • Response to uncertainties • Avoiding costs • Improved compliance • Customer expectations • Bond rating • Funding opportunities Source Water Protection
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Implementing SWP isa Good Value • The net present value is $125 million • The benefit-cost ratio is 1.4 • The internal rate of return is 18% Cadmus study 2016
  • 9.
    Index of ForestImportance to Drinking Water