SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Following the Sports Fan with
Arbitron’s PPM




 Glenn Enoch      Kelly Johnson         Lung Huang
 VP, Integrated   Director, Media and     VP, National
 Media Research   Promotion Research    Account Services
   ESPN, Inc.          ESPN, Inc.         Arbitron Inc.
Arbitron, Inc.

    •   Media and market research company founded
        over 50 years ago
    •   Currently measuring media in over 280+ markets
        in the U. S. and Puerto Rico.
    •   One of the two companies selected by the
        Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement
        (CIMM) for a three-screen test



2
Overview

    •   A ESPN and Arbitron November 2010 study measured
        consumption on ESPN national cable television and radio:
        –   Football games and studio programs on TV
             •   ESPN
             •   ESPN2
             •   ESPNews
        –   ESPN local radio stations (Total Day)
    •   Arbitron reported:
        –   In-home estimates
        –   Out-of-home estimates
        –   Platform duplication



3
PPM Measurement
    •   The study leveraged data collected by the Arbitron Portable
        People Meter™ (PPM™) service.
        –   Panel of 42,000 consumers in 39 markets
        –   Panelists carry a cell-phone-like device that automatically and
            continuously captures a panelist’s exposure to encoded, audio-based
            media, no matter where it occurs.




4
How the PPM Service Works
    1. PPM encoding        2. The meter, worn by individuals, 3. Data collected by
       solution identifies    stores all acoustically captured   the meter are sent
       broadcast and          encoded audio signals that these   to Arbitron
       online content         consumers are exposed to




5
Why Radio?


                                                        Radio
                     Radio
                                                         16%
                      24%


                                       76%
                                                                84%



                     Percent of Minutes                Percent of Minutes
                       Total Media Use                  ESPN Media Use


    Source: Nielsen, Arbitron, comScore, MRI
    Avg Month 4Q 2009
6
• Move Cross-Platform Research from a special
      project to a standard practice
    • Inform media plans with predictive measures
      and consumer insights
    • Link to existing media currencies and ad
      performance research



7
Minute-Stacking is Easy
                                      ESPN/ABC World Cup Gross Viewing
                                             (Minutes, Millions)

                                              34,237
                                          942       948
                                               2,970         Digital = 17% Lift

                                                                    ESPN Mobile
                                                                    ESPN3.com
                                               29,377               ESPN.com
                                                                    TV Matches




    Source: Nielsen (TV), Omniture (Digital)

8
Net Reach is Hard


                   Mobile           Internet
    TV




           Audio            Print




9
Getting Minutes From User Segments
                       Is Even Harder

                                     Audio+Internet
                                        29 minutes
         TV Only
        30 minutes
                                        Five Platforms
                                           45 minutes
     TV+Audio+
      Internet
     38 minutes
                                         TV+Int+
                                        Mob+Print
                  TV + Mobile            41 minutes
                   34 minutes


10
Our Approach to Cross-Media Analysis

       Break users down into             Account for their usage
         cells of media use                 of each medium
     (Behavioral Segmentation)
                                                A   B   C   D
             A             B    C    D    A
                                          B
                                                6
                                                    4
                                          C             1
             AB            AC   AD        D
                                          AB    3   5
                                                            8

                                          AC    1       9
            BC            BD    CD        AD
                                          BC
                                                4
                                                    3   7
                                                            4

                                          BD        6       1
           ABCACD BCD ABD                 CD            5   9
                                          ABC   6   5   8
                           AB             ACD   4       4   7
                                          BCD       7   2   6
                           CD             ABD   5   2       8


                                                                   21
     a/k/a “Research Sudoku”
11
Four Elements of Arbitron Project
        TV                 In-Home




       Radio             Out-of-Home




12
15 User/Usage Cells
                                                              T: TV            R: Radio
                                                   T1/R2                                    R1/T2
                                                                        TR1
                                                                T1                R1
                     1: In Home             T12/R1                                               T1/R12

                                                              T12      TR12       R12

             2: Out of Home                 T12/R2                                               T2/R12
                                                                T2      TR2       R2



       T1    TV Only, In Home Only           TR1 TV and Radio, In Home Only      T12/R1   No OOH Radio
       T2    TV Only, Out of Home Only       TR2 TV and Radio, OOH Only          T12/R2   No In Home Radio
       R1    Radio Only, In Home Only        T12 TV Only, In Home and OOH        T1/R12   No OOH TV
       R2    Radio Only, Out of Home Only    R12 Radio Only, In Home and OOH     T2/R12   No In Home TV
     T1/R2   TV In Home, Radio OOH          R1/T2 Radio In Home, TV OOH           TR12    TV and Radio, In Home and OOH



13
Not to be confused with




             R2D2
14
15 User/Usage Cells
     Group       P6+ (000)     Reach%   Users%     Avg Mins   Usage%
     T1           35,318        26.9%    33.8%       221      22.3%
     T2           12,389        7.4%     12.5%       43        1.5%
     R1            1149         0.8%     1.1%        39        0.1%
     R2           1,462         0.8%     1.5%        22        0.1%
     TR1          1,740         1.3%     1.7%        321       1.6%
     TR2           683          0.2%     0.7%        81        0.2%
     T12          25,984        12.3%    27.1%       426      31.6%
     R12          1,595         1.1%     1.6%        202       0.9%
     T12/R1        1099         0.6%     1.1%        538       1.7%
     T12/R2       2,617         1.0%     2.8%        570       4.3%
     T1/R12       4,937         2.9%     5.0%        694       9.8%
     T2/R12        728          0.4%     0.8%        230       0.5%
     T1/R2        1,964         1.0%     2.0%        286       1.6%
     T2/R1         240          0.1%     0.2%        58        0.0%
     TR12         7,526         2.5%     8.2%       1106      23.8%
     ALL USERS    99,431        59.5%   100.0%       352      100.0%


15
Reach By Platform

                              99.4
                95.2
                                                      84.3
                                        80.8
     Millions




                                                                                  TV
                                                             41.7          43.4   Radio
                                                                                  Total
                       25.7                    22.5
                                                                    14.0



                 Persons 6+              Persons 18+           Men 18+


16
Shared-Exclusive Reach

             Reach (Millions)                            Radio Exclusive Reach
                                                     •      4.2 Million Persons
     99.4                                            •      3.5 Million Adults
     4.2
            84.3                                     •      1.8 Million Men
     21.5   3.5
            19.0
                                Radio Only
                                                           Percent of Total Users
                    43.4        Both
                     1.8                                                Radio        Radio
     73.7           12.3        TV Only                       Radio    Exclusive    Shared
            61.8
                                             Persons 6+        26%        4%          22%
                    29.4                     Persons 18+       27%         4%        23%
                                             Males 18+         32%         4%        28%

     P6+    P18+   M18+


17
Reach By Location

                              99.4

                84.9                                  84.3
                                        71.9
     Millions




                       61.2
                                                                                  In Home
                                               53.5
                                                                           43.4   OOH
                                                             37.3
                                                                    30.2          Total




                 Persons 6+             Persons 18+            Men 18+


18
Shared-Exclusive Reach
             Reach (Millions)                   Out of Home Exclusive Reach
                                                   •      14.5 Million Persons
     99.4                                          •      12.4 Million Adults
     14.5   84.3                                   •      6.1 Million Men
            12.4

     46.7                       OOH Only
                                                         Percent of Total Users
            41.1     43.4       Both
                                                            Out of     OOH         OOH
                      6.1       IH Only                     Home     Exclusive    Shared
                     24.1                  Persons 6+        62%       15%         47%
     38.2   30.8                           Persons 18+       63%        15%        48%
                     13.2
                                           Males 18+         69%        14%        55%

     P6+    P18+    M18+


19
Reach By Platform By Location

                    TV                             Radio

           15%                                           16%
                                           26%
                             44%

        41%
                                                        58%
     In-Home Only   IH+OOH   OOH Only   In-Home Only   IH+OOH   OOH Only



20
OOH TV/Radio Add Reach

        ESPN Content Reach (P18+ 000)      1,470
                                           3,498     Exclusive Reach
                                         10,505      15.5 million (+23%)

       68,800
                                                           OOH TV+Radio Only
                                         40,347
                   44,998                                  Radio Only

                                                           OOH TV Only
                               22,468
                                         28,453            IH TV+Other

                                                           IH TV Only
     In-Home TV   OOH TV        Radio
                                        P18+ (000)


21
Why Time Is Important

              Platform                         Location
      4%        1%                               2%
                                       15%
      22%
               43%
                                       47%       74%
                         Radio Only                       OOH Only
                         Both                             Both
      74%                TV Only                          IH Only
               55%
                                       38%
                                                 24%

     Users%   Usage%                  Users%   Usage%


22
Time Spent with TV, Radio
     Multiplatform Users Have Greater Time Spent

          ESPN Content – Persons 18+ (h:mm/month)

                         TV       Radio      Total

        TV Only         4:37                 4:37

        Radio Only                1:41       1:41

        TV + Radio      7:57      4:31      12:28

        TV + Radio%     64%       36%




23
Time Spent by Location
     Multilocation Users Have Greater Time Spent

          ESPN Content – Persons 18+ (h:mm/month)
                            In      Out of
                                             Total
                           Home     Home

        In Home Only       3:51               3:51

        Out of Home Only             0:44     0:44

        In Home + OOH      7:11      2:33     9:44

        In Home + OOH %     74%      26%




24
Percent of Minutes by Platform/Location


                  10%
             7%
                                    In Home TV
           11%                      OOH TV
                                    In-Home Radio
                                    OOH Radio
                        73%




25
Lift over In-Home TV
                       “Beyond the Ratings”

                         31.7                     +40%
                          5.5                      24%
                          3.6                      16%
     Radio
     OOH TV
     In-Home TV          22.6




                   Minutes (Billions)
                                              Lift over IH TV


26
Audience Composition

                   Gender                                       Age

     Total Mins          70%        30%    Total Mins     19%     42%          39%

       OOH TV            66%        34%        IH TV      23%         46%          31%

         IH TV           69%        31%      OOH TV       21%     41%          38%

       IH Radio          76%         24%   OOH Radio 8%          51%           41%

     OOH Radio            85%        15%     IH Radio 10%       35%          55%

                  Male     Female                       P6-24   P25-49      P50+



27
15 User/Usage Cells
     Group       P6+ (000)     Reach%   Users%     Avg Mins   Usage%
     T1           35,318        26.9%    33.8%       221      22.3%
     T2           12,389        7.4%     12.5%       43        1.5%
     R1           1,149         0.8%     1.1%        39        0.1%
     R2           1,462         0.8%     1.5%        22        0.1%
     TR1          1,740         1.3%     1.7%        321       1.6%
     TR2           683          0.2%     0.7%        81        0.2%
     T12          25,984        12.3%    27.1%       426      31.6%
     R12          1,595         1.1%     1.6%        202       0.9%
     T12/R1       1,099         0.6%     1.1%        538       1.7%
     T12/R2       2,617         1.0%     2.8%        570       4.3%
     T1/R12       4,937         2.9%     5.0%        694       9.8%
     T2/R12        728          0.4%     0.8%        230       0.5%
     T1/R2        1,964         1.0%     2.0%        286       1.6%
     T2/R1         240          0.1%     0.2%        58        0.0%
     TR12         7,526         2.5%     8.2%       1106      23.8%
     ALL USERS    99,431        59.5%   100.0%       352      100.0%


28
15 User/Usage Cells (Ranked by Usage%)
     Group          P6+ (000)   Reach%   Users%   Avg Mins   Usage%
     T12             25,984     12.3%    27.1%      426      31.6%
     TR12            7,526       2.5%     8.2%     1106      23.8%
     T1              35,318     26.9%    33.8%      221      22.3%
     T1/R12          4,937       2.9%     5.0%      694       9.8%
     T12/R2          2,617       1.0%     2.8%      570       4.3%
     T12/R1          1,099       0.6%     1.1%      538       1.7%
     T1/R2           1,964       1.0%     2.0%      286       1.6%
     TR1             1,740       1.3%     1.7%      321       1.6%
     T2              12,389      7.4%    12.5%      43        1.5%
     R12             1,595       1.1%     1.6%      202       0.9%
     T2/R12           728        0.4%     0.8%      230       0.5%
     TR2              683        0.2%     0.7%      81        0.2%
     R1              1,149       0.8%     1.1%      39        0.1%
     R2              1,462       0.8%     1.5%      22        0.1%
     T2/R1            240        0.1%     0.2%      58        0.0%
     ALL USERS       84,273     71.5%    100.0%     375      100.0%


29
Users and Usage

         Users (P6+ Millions)           Usage (Avg Minutes)      Usage%

       T12                26.0                 426                            31.6%

      TR12      7.5                                       1106            23.8%

        T1                       35.3         221                         22.3%

     T1/R12    4.9                                  694            9.8%

     T12/R2   2.6                                  570           4.3%

       Rest             23.0                 125                  8.2%

      Total    99.4 Million                    352 Minutes


30
Usage By Platform/Location

                      Usage (Avg Minutes) of Minutes
                                  Percent

       T12                    426     81%                    19%

      TR12                    50% 1106      9% 14%         26%

        T1                  221          100%

     T1/R12                    56%
                                694              21%        23%

     T12/R2                    570 73%                   20%       7%

       Rest                125
                             49%                24%     14% 13%

      Total                 IH 352 Minutes IH Radio
                               TV  OOH TV              OOH Radio


31
Users (Audience Composition)
                     Gender

         T1 (22%)    45%             55%

        T12 (32%)     54%             46%        More Radio,
                                                 More OOH =
     T1/R12 (10%)      60%             40%       More Male

      T12/R2 (4%)          67%         33%

      TR12 (24%)            74%            26%

        Rest (8%)     50%            50%

                    Male    Female


32
Users (Audience Composition)
                            Age

         T1 (22%)     29%          34%         37%   Young + Old

        T12 (32%)    24%           42%         34%

      T12/R2 (4%)   18%           47%          35%

     T1/R12 (10%)    19%          41%          40%

      TR12 (24%)    14%        48%             37%   Middle-Aged

        Rest (8%)     25%          41%         34%

                    P6-24   P25-49      P50+


33
Summary

     •   Arbitron
         –   Passive electronic measurement of TV and radio
         –   Ability to distinguish in-home and out-of-home usage
         –   Large sample size
     •   ESPN
         –   Users/Usage analysis: Behavioral segmentation with minutes
         –   Fit Arbitron project into larger ESPN XP initiative
         –   Both TV and Radio content during month



34
Summary

     •   Created a “usage pie”
         –   73% of usage was in-home TV
         –   Radio = 17%
         –   OOH = 21%
     •   TV mostly in-home users (41% both in-home/OOH)
     •   Radio mostly OOH users (58% both in-home/OOH)
     •   Radio and out-of-home contribute greater P25+ and P25-49
         audiences
     •   Multiplatform and multilocation users are heavier consumers
         of ESPN content



35
Summary

     •   The four elements (Radio, TV, In-Home, Out-of-Home) produce
         15 user/usage cells
     •   Five of the cells contribute 77% of users, 92% of usage
     •   Able to measure exclusive Reach and usage from Radio and
         out-of-home
         –   Radio Only = 4.2 million persons
         –   Out-of-Home Only = 14.5 million persons
         –   Radio or OOH TV vs In-Home TV:
              • Reach = 15.5 million persons (+23%)

              • Minutes = 9.1 billion minutes (+40%)




36
Follow Us on Twitter



 @ESPNResearch

More Related Content

Similar to Following the Sports Fan with Arbitron’s PPM

Video platforms on internet
Video platforms on internetVideo platforms on internet
Video platforms on internetWerner Ramaekers
 
Vs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshare
Vs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshareVs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshare
Vs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshareScott Carrey
 
simple video compression
simple video compression simple video compression
simple video compression
LaLit DuBey
 
Elisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTV
Elisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTVElisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTV
Elisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTV
Elysée (Elisha) Attia
 
CGAT 09
CGAT 09CGAT 09
CGAT 09
dannyiPhone
 
Broadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspi
Broadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspiBroadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspi
Broadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspi
SSPI Brasil
 
Next.gen.tv.advertising
Next.gen.tv.advertisingNext.gen.tv.advertising
Next.gen.tv.advertisingAditya Kishore
 
Communication medium in modern tv
Communication medium in modern tvCommunication medium in modern tv
Communication medium in modern tv
Harsh Mehta
 
Multi media unit-3.doc
Multi media unit-3.docMulti media unit-3.doc
Multi media unit-3.doc
Anjaan Gajendra
 
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architecture
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architectureAccelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architecture
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architecture
account inactive
 
What is a Podcast? 09-05
What is a Podcast? 09-05What is a Podcast? 09-05
What is a Podcast? 09-05
dpanarelli
 
Multimedia-Lecture-6.pptx
Multimedia-Lecture-6.pptxMultimedia-Lecture-6.pptx
Multimedia-Lecture-6.pptx
vishal choudhary
 
To Understand Video
To Understand VideoTo Understand Video
To Understand Video
adil raja
 
Application of Computer in Televison Industry
Application of Computer in Televison IndustryApplication of Computer in Televison Industry
Application of Computer in Televison Industry
Basil Mattamana
 
050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討
050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討
050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討Anderson Huang
 
MPEG_23.pptx
MPEG_23.pptxMPEG_23.pptx
MPEG_23.pptx
zulhelmanz
 

Similar to Following the Sports Fan with Arbitron’s PPM (20)

Video platforms on internet
Video platforms on internetVideo platforms on internet
Video platforms on internet
 
Tenow
TenowTenow
Tenow
 
Vs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshare
Vs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshareVs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshare
Vs199 hd/data essentials sc master rev3_10_2013_compressed_4_slideshare
 
Dth Technology
Dth TechnologyDth Technology
Dth Technology
 
General inventory sheet
General inventory sheetGeneral inventory sheet
General inventory sheet
 
simple video compression
simple video compression simple video compression
simple video compression
 
Elisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTV
Elisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTVElisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTV
Elisha Attia Logtel from ANALOG 2 HDTV
 
CGAT 09
CGAT 09CGAT 09
CGAT 09
 
Broadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspi
Broadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspiBroadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspi
Broadcast day-2010-ses-world-skies-sspi
 
Next.gen.tv.advertising
Next.gen.tv.advertisingNext.gen.tv.advertising
Next.gen.tv.advertising
 
Communication medium in modern tv
Communication medium in modern tvCommunication medium in modern tv
Communication medium in modern tv
 
Multi media unit-3.doc
Multi media unit-3.docMulti media unit-3.doc
Multi media unit-3.doc
 
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architecture
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architectureAccelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architecture
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architecture
 
Abipbox
AbipboxAbipbox
Abipbox
 
What is a Podcast? 09-05
What is a Podcast? 09-05What is a Podcast? 09-05
What is a Podcast? 09-05
 
Multimedia-Lecture-6.pptx
Multimedia-Lecture-6.pptxMultimedia-Lecture-6.pptx
Multimedia-Lecture-6.pptx
 
To Understand Video
To Understand VideoTo Understand Video
To Understand Video
 
Application of Computer in Televison Industry
Application of Computer in Televison IndustryApplication of Computer in Televison Industry
Application of Computer in Televison Industry
 
050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討
050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討
050411 stb產業發展與應用趨勢探討
 
MPEG_23.pptx
MPEG_23.pptxMPEG_23.pptx
MPEG_23.pptx
 

More from The Advertising Research Foundation

Social media ethics and concerns
Social media ethics and concernsSocial media ethics and concerns
Social media ethics and concerns
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Insights from CIMM
Insights from CIMMInsights from CIMM
Meeting the Challenges of Cross Media Research
Meeting the Challenges of Cross Media ResearchMeeting the Challenges of Cross Media Research
Meeting the Challenges of Cross Media Research
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Impact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer Behavior
Impact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer BehaviorImpact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer Behavior
Impact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer Behavior
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
BrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to Avoid
BrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to AvoidBrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to Avoid
BrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to Avoid
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Facebook's Information Platform
Facebook's Information Platform Facebook's Information Platform
Facebook's Information Platform
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
The Television Audience Redefined: An Update
The Television Audience Redefined: An UpdateThe Television Audience Redefined: An Update
The Television Audience Redefined: An Update
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Measuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet Measurement
Measuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet MeasurementMeasuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet Measurement
Measuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet Measurement
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Integrated Social Media: Business Impact Study 2011
Integrated Social Media:Business Impact Study 2011Integrated Social Media:Business Impact Study 2011
Integrated Social Media: Business Impact Study 2011
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Global Perspectives on Measurement Issues
Global Perspectives on Measurement IssuesGlobal Perspectives on Measurement Issues
Global Perspectives on Measurement Issues
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Insights for the Future of Online Video Commercialization
Insights for the Future of Online Video CommercializationInsights for the Future of Online Video Commercialization
Insights for the Future of Online Video Commercialization
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
New Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital Touchpoints
New Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital TouchpointsNew Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital Touchpoints
New Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital Touchpoints
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...
Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...
Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
SHOPPER INSIGHTS
SHOPPER INSIGHTSSHOPPER INSIGHTS
The Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online Advertising
The Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online AdvertisingThe Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online Advertising
The Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online Advertising
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Understanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV Viewership
Understanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV ViewershipUnderstanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV Viewership
Understanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV Viewership
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Study of the Key Drivers of Online Content Consumption
Study of the Key Drivers of Online Content ConsumptionStudy of the Key Drivers of Online Content Consumption
Study of the Key Drivers of Online Content Consumption
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...
Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...
Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...
What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...
What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...
The Advertising Research Foundation
 
Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...
Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...
Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...
The Advertising Research Foundation
 

More from The Advertising Research Foundation (20)

Social media ethics and concerns
Social media ethics and concernsSocial media ethics and concerns
Social media ethics and concerns
 
Insights from CIMM
Insights from CIMMInsights from CIMM
Insights from CIMM
 
Meeting the Challenges of Cross Media Research
Meeting the Challenges of Cross Media ResearchMeeting the Challenges of Cross Media Research
Meeting the Challenges of Cross Media Research
 
Impact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer Behavior
Impact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer BehaviorImpact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer Behavior
Impact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer Behavior
 
BrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to Avoid
BrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to AvoidBrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to Avoid
BrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to Avoid
 
Facebook's Information Platform
Facebook's Information Platform Facebook's Information Platform
Facebook's Information Platform
 
The Television Audience Redefined: An Update
The Television Audience Redefined: An UpdateThe Television Audience Redefined: An Update
The Television Audience Redefined: An Update
 
Measuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet Measurement
Measuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet MeasurementMeasuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet Measurement
Measuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet Measurement
 
Integrated Social Media: Business Impact Study 2011
Integrated Social Media:Business Impact Study 2011Integrated Social Media:Business Impact Study 2011
Integrated Social Media: Business Impact Study 2011
 
Global Perspectives on Measurement Issues
Global Perspectives on Measurement IssuesGlobal Perspectives on Measurement Issues
Global Perspectives on Measurement Issues
 
Insights for the Future of Online Video Commercialization
Insights for the Future of Online Video CommercializationInsights for the Future of Online Video Commercialization
Insights for the Future of Online Video Commercialization
 
New Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital Touchpoints
New Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital TouchpointsNew Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital Touchpoints
New Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital Touchpoints
 
Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...
Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...
Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive MoreConsumer...
 
SHOPPER INSIGHTS
SHOPPER INSIGHTSSHOPPER INSIGHTS
SHOPPER INSIGHTS
 
The Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online Advertising
The Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online AdvertisingThe Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online Advertising
The Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online Advertising
 
Understanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV Viewership
Understanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV ViewershipUnderstanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV Viewership
Understanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV Viewership
 
Study of the Key Drivers of Online Content Consumption
Study of the Key Drivers of Online Content ConsumptionStudy of the Key Drivers of Online Content Consumption
Study of the Key Drivers of Online Content Consumption
 
Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...
Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...
Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to...
 
What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...
What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...
What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertisingin iPad® Maga...
 
Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...
Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...
Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and...
 

Recently uploaded

Auditing study material for b.com final year students
Auditing study material for b.com final year  studentsAuditing study material for b.com final year  students
Auditing study material for b.com final year students
narasimhamurthyh4
 
Set off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptx
Set off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptxSet off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptx
Set off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptx
HARSHITHV26
 
Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...
Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...
Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...
Boris Ziegler
 
BeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdf
BeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdfBeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdf
BeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdf
DerekIwanaka1
 
Mastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnap
Mastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnapMastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnap
Mastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnap
Norma Mushkat Gaffin
 
The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...
The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...
The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...
balatucanapplelovely
 
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and Templates
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesDigital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and Templates
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and Templates
Aurelien Domont, MBA
 
Bài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdf
Bài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdfBài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdf
Bài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdf
daothibichhang1
 
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx
tanyjahb
 
Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431
Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431
Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431
ecamare2
 
Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)
Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)
Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)
Lviv Startup Club
 
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
FelixPerez547899
 
Authentically Social Presented by Corey Perlman
Authentically Social Presented by Corey PerlmanAuthentically Social Presented by Corey Perlman
Authentically Social Presented by Corey Perlman
Corey Perlman, Social Media Speaker and Consultant
 
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesEvent Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
Holger Mueller
 
amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05
amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05
amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05
marketing317746
 
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...
dylandmeas
 
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesPremium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
SynapseIndia
 
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying Them
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemUnderstanding User Needs and Satisfying Them
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying Them
Aggregage
 
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptx
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptxTop mailing list providers in the USA.pptx
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptx
JeremyPeirce1
 
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxPutting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
Cynthia Clay
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Auditing study material for b.com final year students
Auditing study material for b.com final year  studentsAuditing study material for b.com final year  students
Auditing study material for b.com final year students
 
Set off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptx
Set off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptxSet off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptx
Set off and carry forward of losses and assessment of individuals.pptx
 
Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...
Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...
Agency Managed Advisory Board As a Solution To Career Path Defining Business ...
 
BeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdf
BeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdfBeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdf
BeMetals Investor Presentation_June 1, 2024.pdf
 
Mastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnap
Mastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnapMastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnap
Mastering B2B Payments Webinar from BlueSnap
 
The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...
The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...
The effects of customers service quality and online reviews on customer loyal...
 
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and Templates
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesDigital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and Templates
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and Templates
 
Bài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdf
Bài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdfBài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdf
Bài tập - Tiếng anh 11 Global Success UNIT 1 - Bản HS.doc.pdf
 
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptx
 
Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431
Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431
Observation Lab PowerPoint Assignment for TEM 431
 
Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)
Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)
Helen Lubchak: Тренди в управлінні проєктами та miltech (UA)
 
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
 
Authentically Social Presented by Corey Perlman
Authentically Social Presented by Corey PerlmanAuthentically Social Presented by Corey Perlman
Authentically Social Presented by Corey Perlman
 
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesEvent Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
 
amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05
amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05
amptalk_RecruitingDeck_english_2024.06.05
 
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...
 
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesPremium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern Businesses
 
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying Them
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemUnderstanding User Needs and Satisfying Them
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying Them
 
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptx
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptxTop mailing list providers in the USA.pptx
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptx
 
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxPutting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
 

Following the Sports Fan with Arbitron’s PPM

  • 1. Following the Sports Fan with Arbitron’s PPM Glenn Enoch Kelly Johnson Lung Huang VP, Integrated Director, Media and VP, National Media Research Promotion Research Account Services ESPN, Inc. ESPN, Inc. Arbitron Inc.
  • 2. Arbitron, Inc. • Media and market research company founded over 50 years ago • Currently measuring media in over 280+ markets in the U. S. and Puerto Rico. • One of the two companies selected by the Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement (CIMM) for a three-screen test 2
  • 3. Overview • A ESPN and Arbitron November 2010 study measured consumption on ESPN national cable television and radio: – Football games and studio programs on TV • ESPN • ESPN2 • ESPNews – ESPN local radio stations (Total Day) • Arbitron reported: – In-home estimates – Out-of-home estimates – Platform duplication 3
  • 4. PPM Measurement • The study leveraged data collected by the Arbitron Portable People Meter™ (PPM™) service. – Panel of 42,000 consumers in 39 markets – Panelists carry a cell-phone-like device that automatically and continuously captures a panelist’s exposure to encoded, audio-based media, no matter where it occurs. 4
  • 5. How the PPM Service Works 1. PPM encoding 2. The meter, worn by individuals, 3. Data collected by solution identifies stores all acoustically captured the meter are sent broadcast and encoded audio signals that these to Arbitron online content consumers are exposed to 5
  • 6. Why Radio? Radio Radio 16% 24% 76% 84% Percent of Minutes Percent of Minutes Total Media Use ESPN Media Use Source: Nielsen, Arbitron, comScore, MRI Avg Month 4Q 2009 6
  • 7. • Move Cross-Platform Research from a special project to a standard practice • Inform media plans with predictive measures and consumer insights • Link to existing media currencies and ad performance research 7
  • 8. Minute-Stacking is Easy ESPN/ABC World Cup Gross Viewing (Minutes, Millions) 34,237 942 948 2,970 Digital = 17% Lift ESPN Mobile ESPN3.com 29,377 ESPN.com TV Matches Source: Nielsen (TV), Omniture (Digital) 8
  • 9. Net Reach is Hard Mobile Internet TV Audio Print 9
  • 10. Getting Minutes From User Segments Is Even Harder Audio+Internet 29 minutes TV Only 30 minutes Five Platforms 45 minutes TV+Audio+ Internet 38 minutes TV+Int+ Mob+Print TV + Mobile 41 minutes 34 minutes 10
  • 11. Our Approach to Cross-Media Analysis Break users down into Account for their usage cells of media use of each medium (Behavioral Segmentation) A B C D A B C D A B 6 4 C 1 AB AC AD D AB 3 5 8 AC 1 9 BC BD CD AD BC 4 3 7 4 BD 6 1 ABCACD BCD ABD CD 5 9 ABC 6 5 8 AB ACD 4 4 7 BCD 7 2 6 CD ABD 5 2 8 21 a/k/a “Research Sudoku” 11
  • 12. Four Elements of Arbitron Project TV In-Home Radio Out-of-Home 12
  • 13. 15 User/Usage Cells T: TV R: Radio T1/R2 R1/T2 TR1 T1 R1 1: In Home T12/R1 T1/R12 T12 TR12 R12 2: Out of Home T12/R2 T2/R12 T2 TR2 R2 T1 TV Only, In Home Only TR1 TV and Radio, In Home Only T12/R1 No OOH Radio T2 TV Only, Out of Home Only TR2 TV and Radio, OOH Only T12/R2 No In Home Radio R1 Radio Only, In Home Only T12 TV Only, In Home and OOH T1/R12 No OOH TV R2 Radio Only, Out of Home Only R12 Radio Only, In Home and OOH T2/R12 No In Home TV T1/R2 TV In Home, Radio OOH R1/T2 Radio In Home, TV OOH TR12 TV and Radio, In Home and OOH 13
  • 14. Not to be confused with R2D2 14
  • 15. 15 User/Usage Cells Group P6+ (000) Reach% Users% Avg Mins Usage% T1 35,318 26.9% 33.8% 221 22.3% T2 12,389 7.4% 12.5% 43 1.5% R1 1149 0.8% 1.1% 39 0.1% R2 1,462 0.8% 1.5% 22 0.1% TR1 1,740 1.3% 1.7% 321 1.6% TR2 683 0.2% 0.7% 81 0.2% T12 25,984 12.3% 27.1% 426 31.6% R12 1,595 1.1% 1.6% 202 0.9% T12/R1 1099 0.6% 1.1% 538 1.7% T12/R2 2,617 1.0% 2.8% 570 4.3% T1/R12 4,937 2.9% 5.0% 694 9.8% T2/R12 728 0.4% 0.8% 230 0.5% T1/R2 1,964 1.0% 2.0% 286 1.6% T2/R1 240 0.1% 0.2% 58 0.0% TR12 7,526 2.5% 8.2% 1106 23.8% ALL USERS 99,431 59.5% 100.0% 352 100.0% 15
  • 16. Reach By Platform 99.4 95.2 84.3 80.8 Millions TV 41.7 43.4 Radio Total 25.7 22.5 14.0 Persons 6+ Persons 18+ Men 18+ 16
  • 17. Shared-Exclusive Reach Reach (Millions) Radio Exclusive Reach • 4.2 Million Persons 99.4 • 3.5 Million Adults 4.2 84.3 • 1.8 Million Men 21.5 3.5 19.0 Radio Only Percent of Total Users 43.4 Both 1.8 Radio Radio 73.7 12.3 TV Only Radio Exclusive Shared 61.8 Persons 6+ 26% 4% 22% 29.4 Persons 18+ 27% 4% 23% Males 18+ 32% 4% 28% P6+ P18+ M18+ 17
  • 18. Reach By Location 99.4 84.9 84.3 71.9 Millions 61.2 In Home 53.5 43.4 OOH 37.3 30.2 Total Persons 6+ Persons 18+ Men 18+ 18
  • 19. Shared-Exclusive Reach Reach (Millions) Out of Home Exclusive Reach • 14.5 Million Persons 99.4 • 12.4 Million Adults 14.5 84.3 • 6.1 Million Men 12.4 46.7 OOH Only Percent of Total Users 41.1 43.4 Both Out of OOH OOH 6.1 IH Only Home Exclusive Shared 24.1 Persons 6+ 62% 15% 47% 38.2 30.8 Persons 18+ 63% 15% 48% 13.2 Males 18+ 69% 14% 55% P6+ P18+ M18+ 19
  • 20. Reach By Platform By Location TV Radio 15% 16% 26% 44% 41% 58% In-Home Only IH+OOH OOH Only In-Home Only IH+OOH OOH Only 20
  • 21. OOH TV/Radio Add Reach ESPN Content Reach (P18+ 000) 1,470 3,498 Exclusive Reach 10,505 15.5 million (+23%) 68,800 OOH TV+Radio Only 40,347 44,998 Radio Only OOH TV Only 22,468 28,453 IH TV+Other IH TV Only In-Home TV OOH TV Radio P18+ (000) 21
  • 22. Why Time Is Important Platform Location 4% 1% 2% 15% 22% 43% 47% 74% Radio Only OOH Only Both Both 74% TV Only IH Only 55% 38% 24% Users% Usage% Users% Usage% 22
  • 23. Time Spent with TV, Radio Multiplatform Users Have Greater Time Spent ESPN Content – Persons 18+ (h:mm/month) TV Radio Total TV Only 4:37 4:37 Radio Only 1:41 1:41 TV + Radio 7:57 4:31 12:28 TV + Radio% 64% 36% 23
  • 24. Time Spent by Location Multilocation Users Have Greater Time Spent ESPN Content – Persons 18+ (h:mm/month) In Out of Total Home Home In Home Only 3:51 3:51 Out of Home Only 0:44 0:44 In Home + OOH 7:11 2:33 9:44 In Home + OOH % 74% 26% 24
  • 25. Percent of Minutes by Platform/Location 10% 7% In Home TV 11% OOH TV In-Home Radio OOH Radio 73% 25
  • 26. Lift over In-Home TV “Beyond the Ratings” 31.7 +40% 5.5 24% 3.6 16% Radio OOH TV In-Home TV 22.6 Minutes (Billions) Lift over IH TV 26
  • 27. Audience Composition Gender Age Total Mins 70% 30% Total Mins 19% 42% 39% OOH TV 66% 34% IH TV 23% 46% 31% IH TV 69% 31% OOH TV 21% 41% 38% IH Radio 76% 24% OOH Radio 8% 51% 41% OOH Radio 85% 15% IH Radio 10% 35% 55% Male Female P6-24 P25-49 P50+ 27
  • 28. 15 User/Usage Cells Group P6+ (000) Reach% Users% Avg Mins Usage% T1 35,318 26.9% 33.8% 221 22.3% T2 12,389 7.4% 12.5% 43 1.5% R1 1,149 0.8% 1.1% 39 0.1% R2 1,462 0.8% 1.5% 22 0.1% TR1 1,740 1.3% 1.7% 321 1.6% TR2 683 0.2% 0.7% 81 0.2% T12 25,984 12.3% 27.1% 426 31.6% R12 1,595 1.1% 1.6% 202 0.9% T12/R1 1,099 0.6% 1.1% 538 1.7% T12/R2 2,617 1.0% 2.8% 570 4.3% T1/R12 4,937 2.9% 5.0% 694 9.8% T2/R12 728 0.4% 0.8% 230 0.5% T1/R2 1,964 1.0% 2.0% 286 1.6% T2/R1 240 0.1% 0.2% 58 0.0% TR12 7,526 2.5% 8.2% 1106 23.8% ALL USERS 99,431 59.5% 100.0% 352 100.0% 28
  • 29. 15 User/Usage Cells (Ranked by Usage%) Group P6+ (000) Reach% Users% Avg Mins Usage% T12 25,984 12.3% 27.1% 426 31.6% TR12 7,526 2.5% 8.2% 1106 23.8% T1 35,318 26.9% 33.8% 221 22.3% T1/R12 4,937 2.9% 5.0% 694 9.8% T12/R2 2,617 1.0% 2.8% 570 4.3% T12/R1 1,099 0.6% 1.1% 538 1.7% T1/R2 1,964 1.0% 2.0% 286 1.6% TR1 1,740 1.3% 1.7% 321 1.6% T2 12,389 7.4% 12.5% 43 1.5% R12 1,595 1.1% 1.6% 202 0.9% T2/R12 728 0.4% 0.8% 230 0.5% TR2 683 0.2% 0.7% 81 0.2% R1 1,149 0.8% 1.1% 39 0.1% R2 1,462 0.8% 1.5% 22 0.1% T2/R1 240 0.1% 0.2% 58 0.0% ALL USERS 84,273 71.5% 100.0% 375 100.0% 29
  • 30. Users and Usage Users (P6+ Millions) Usage (Avg Minutes) Usage% T12 26.0 426 31.6% TR12 7.5 1106 23.8% T1 35.3 221 22.3% T1/R12 4.9 694 9.8% T12/R2 2.6 570 4.3% Rest 23.0 125 8.2% Total 99.4 Million 352 Minutes 30
  • 31. Usage By Platform/Location Usage (Avg Minutes) of Minutes Percent T12 426 81% 19% TR12 50% 1106 9% 14% 26% T1 221 100% T1/R12 56% 694 21% 23% T12/R2 570 73% 20% 7% Rest 125 49% 24% 14% 13% Total IH 352 Minutes IH Radio TV OOH TV OOH Radio 31
  • 32. Users (Audience Composition) Gender T1 (22%) 45% 55% T12 (32%) 54% 46% More Radio, More OOH = T1/R12 (10%) 60% 40% More Male T12/R2 (4%) 67% 33% TR12 (24%) 74% 26% Rest (8%) 50% 50% Male Female 32
  • 33. Users (Audience Composition) Age T1 (22%) 29% 34% 37% Young + Old T12 (32%) 24% 42% 34% T12/R2 (4%) 18% 47% 35% T1/R12 (10%) 19% 41% 40% TR12 (24%) 14% 48% 37% Middle-Aged Rest (8%) 25% 41% 34% P6-24 P25-49 P50+ 33
  • 34. Summary • Arbitron – Passive electronic measurement of TV and radio – Ability to distinguish in-home and out-of-home usage – Large sample size • ESPN – Users/Usage analysis: Behavioral segmentation with minutes – Fit Arbitron project into larger ESPN XP initiative – Both TV and Radio content during month 34
  • 35. Summary • Created a “usage pie” – 73% of usage was in-home TV – Radio = 17% – OOH = 21% • TV mostly in-home users (41% both in-home/OOH) • Radio mostly OOH users (58% both in-home/OOH) • Radio and out-of-home contribute greater P25+ and P25-49 audiences • Multiplatform and multilocation users are heavier consumers of ESPN content 35
  • 36. Summary • The four elements (Radio, TV, In-Home, Out-of-Home) produce 15 user/usage cells • Five of the cells contribute 77% of users, 92% of usage • Able to measure exclusive Reach and usage from Radio and out-of-home – Radio Only = 4.2 million persons – Out-of-Home Only = 14.5 million persons – Radio or OOH TV vs In-Home TV: • Reach = 15.5 million persons (+23%) • Minutes = 9.1 billion minutes (+40%) 36
  • 37. Follow Us on Twitter @ESPNResearch

Editor's Notes

  1. Why is ESPN interested in radio? A better question might be, why isn’t everybody interested in radio? We calculated about a year and a half ago that perhaps a quarter of all media use in a day is radio listening, and one out of every six minutes spent with ESPN was done through radio. Now, this is a combination of sources and methodologies, and the proportions would be somewhat different if we did the same exercise today, but the point is that radio is roughly comparable to the Internet in terms of both users and minutes, yet the email newsletters I get talk about digital media every day, and rarely about radio.At ESPN, we understand that radio represents an enormous amount of usage by sports fans and is a critical channel of information about the sports they follow. We were glad to have the opportunity to get a look at use of ESPN content on both TV and radio during football season.ESPN Radio is also a way for us to connect with our fans locally.
  2. This project is part of our ESPN XP initiative. ESPN XP, which was originally announced at the ARF Re:Think conference in March 2010, encompasses all of our cross-platform research. It has three main goals: to move cross-platform research from a special project (it is clearly still a special project!) to a standard practice, shared sources and methods across the industry. Second, to help advertisers and agencies to create media plans that follow consumers throughout the day, on the best available platform. Third, we are not trying to replace existing currencies, we are trying to get them to work together.
  3. Now, if all we wanted to do was know how people were spending their time on various media platforms, that would be pretty easy. We could take minutes from those existing measures, and stack them up. We did that during our first ESPN XP project, researching the 2010 World Cup. Here, we took gross minutes of viewing from our Nielsen-measured in-home TV audiences, and added gross minutes of viewing from our digital platforms, as measured by Omniture. This shows a lift of 17% in time spent with ESPN. If all we care about is minutes, that’s easy!
  4. What’s hard in the field of cross-platform research is how the various users of each platform overlap. How many TV viewers use the Internet in a day? How many digital media users are Internet-Only, Mobile-Only, or use both? There are lot of ways for these groups to intersect, and our existing measures can’t really help us here.
  5. What’s even harder is to get an accurate read on the overlapping user groups, and then figure out how they contribute to the minutes of usage!
  6. Yet, that has been our approach to cross-platform research from the beginning, even before ESPN XP. First, we break the users down into their cells of media use (create a behavioral segmentation). In this case, imagine that A is TV, B is Radio, C is Internet and D is Mobile. A person could use TV only, or Radio only, or Internet Only or Mobile Only; or, could use TV plus Radio, TV plus Internet, TV plus Mobile….Then, we take these discrete user groups and account for their usage of each medium. How much time does the TV plus Radio user spend with TV, and with Radio? ….and so on.
  7. The project we did with Arbitron on football consumption had four basic elements: viewing to TV, and listening to radio, in-home use of media and out-of-home usage of media.
  8. Those four elements overlap to produce 15 user/usage cells. In this diagram, T is TV viewing, R is radio listening, 1 is in-home usage and 2 is out-of-home usage. So, the “T1” group only watched TV, and only in-home. The “R2” group only listened to radio, and only did so out-of-home. The “T12” group only watched TV, and did so both in-home and out-of-home. The “T12/R2” group watched TV in home and out of home, and also listened to radio out of home (but not in-home). The TR12 group, in the middle, showed used both platforms in both locations.
  9. This is not to be confused with R2D2.
  10. Arbitron was successful in breaking their sample into the 15 discrete user groups, and accounting for their usage of ESPN TV and radio programming. This table is a little complex, so let’s examine the results of the study one step at a time…
  11. …starting with the Users of each platform. Arbitron showed that 95 million persons watched football programs on ESPN, and 26 million listened to ESPN radio affiliates. Our net Reach over the month was 99 million. (And so forth for different demos.)
  12. Now, we’re looking at shared and exclusive Reach over the two platforms. Still the same 99 million net users, but here we see that 74 million only watched ESPN on TV, 4 million only listened on radio, and 22 million used both TV and radio.So, radio provides ESPN with an exclusive reach of 4.2 million persons, 3.5 million adults, and 1.8 million adult men, over what we deliver on TV. Or, to look at it a different way, between one-quarter and one-third of panelists listened to our radio programming, and most of those were also TV viewers.
  13. The other two elements of the project dealt with location, in-home and out-of-home. Again, the same 99 million net users, but we’re showing that 85 million used our content in the home, and 61 million were using the content out-of-home.
  14. This is shared and exclusive Reach by location. Among our 99 million net audience, 38 million only consumed our content in-home, 15 million only consumed out-of-home, and the largest group (47 million) consumed both in-home and out-of-home.In other words, out-of-home consumption provides ESPN with an exclusive reach of 14.5 million persons, 12.4 million adults, and 6.1 million adult men, over what we deliver in-home. Between 60-70 percent of panelists showed out-of-home consumption, and about half of them showed both in-home and out-of-home behavior.
  15. Now, let’s put platform and location together. Our TV Reach was 95 million persons. Most of these (85%) showed in-home consumption — just 15% viewed TV in out-of-home locations only. The in-home viewers were split pretty evenly between those who only viewed in-home, and those who viewed both in-home and out-of-home.Our radio Reach was 26 million persons. Most of these (84%) showed out-of-home consumption — just 16% listened to radio in in-home locations only. The out-of-home Only group was just a quarter of listeners, most people listened to radio both in-home and out-of-home.
  16. Finally, let’s look at incremental Reach in a different way. The Arbitron study showed that we reach 69 million adults through in-home TV viewing, and 45 million through out-of-home TV viewing. We also have a reach of 23 million through radio.Our 69 million Reach with in-home TV encompasses persons who view only in-home TV and those who also have other behaviors. However, this project shows that persons who only consume ESPN content through out-of-home TV viewing, or radio, add an exclusive Reach of 15.5 million persons — a lift of 23% over our in-home TV Reach.
  17. We mentioned at the start of our talk that the hardest thing to do is to derive minutes of usage from discrete groups of users. However, time is the most important element of the analysis, for this reason:We have already shown that multi-platform users represent 22% of our net Reach, and that multi-location users represent 47% of the net Reach.However, that 22% of multi-platform users account for 43% of total minutes of usage, and that 47% of multi-location users account for 74% of total minutes of usage. These two groups of users are pulling much more than their weight in minutes of usage.
  18. The reason that multiplatform users have a greater share of usage is that they are spending more time viewing and listening. The Arbitron data show that the average multiplatform user spent 12 and a half hours with our content, far more than persons who only viewed us on TV or only listened on radio.They’re not only spending more time because they are using two platforms — the multiplatform user is spending almost twice as much time watching TV than the TV-only user, and almost three times as much time listening to radio than the radio-only user.
  19. Same thing with themultilocation user, who is averaging 9 hours 44 minutes with our content, far more than the in-home-only user and the out-of-home-only user. Again, the multilocation user is spending almost twice as much time consuming media in the home compared to the in-home-only user, and over three times as much time consuming media out of home as the out-of-home-only user.
  20. So now let’s leave users behind and look at a simple pie of usage. According to the Arbitron study, about three-quarters of our gross minutes of usage came from in-home TV. Out-of-home consumption of TV and radio accounted for 21% of all minutes.As we started, we talked about how important radio was to ESPN, accounting for 16% of total consumption, and here we see that it accounted for 17% of all minutes in this study.
  21. A couple of slides ago, we showed how out-of-home TV and radio added 23% to the reach of in-home TV alone. They not only add users, they also add usage. Here, we see that OOH TV and radio add 40% lift over our in-home TV minutes. Like all of our ESPN XP projects, this helps us quantify our audience “beyond the ratings.”
  22. What are the differences between these user/usage groups? One way we can assess this is by looking at audience composition by gender and age. In the left-hand graph, you see that radio has a larger proportion of males than TV. We also found that OOH TV has the greatest proportion of females — we theorize that this is groups of friends getting together in locations where football coverage is on. OOH radio has the greatest proportion of males, and we think that this is consumption by men in cars or at work, while in-home consumption of radio may be more likely to include female family members.In the right-hand graph, you see that radio has fewer kids and teens, and a larger proportion of middle-aged and older adults, compared to TV. In-Home TV has the largest proportion of persons aged 6-17, because they are more likely to use TV than terrestrial radio and because they are more likely to be consuming in-home with other family members. OOH radio has the largest proportion of persons aged 25-49 while in-home radio has the largest proportion of persons aged 50+. This reflects greater out-of-home location and opportunity for middle-aged persons — clearly older persons are more likely to be in-home listeners.
  23. Now we’re back to our original table. Still pretty daunting…
  24. …so let’s rank the groups by the percent of usage that they account for. The top five cells account for 77% of all users, and 92% of the usage of the ESPN content that was measured in this study.
  25. The top group is the T12’s – the group that watches TV both in-home and out-of-home, but did not listen to radio. They are a large group, making up over a quarter of all users, and they have above-average usage (426 minutes vs 352 min average), so they account for almost a third of the usage of ESPN content.The second group is the TR12’s, who use both TV and radio, both in-home and out-of-home. They are a relatively small group (8% of users) but have the heaviest usage of any group, averaging 1106 minutes each, so they end up doing almost a quarter of the usage.#3 is the T1’s, who only have in-home TV usage. They are the largest group in terms of users, but they have below-average usage (221 minsvs 352 mins), so although they are over a third of users, they have about a fifth of the usage.The next two groups have both TV and radio usage, and mix of in-home and OOH. They are small in the number of users, but have very high usage, so they pull more than their weight in terms of usage.Then there are the remaining ten groups, who have a lot of persons but very little usage.
  26. Now let’s look at each of the groups, and where their usage comes from. The T1’s are the easiest – 100% of their minutes come from in-home TV viewing.The T12’s are pretty similar, except about one-fifth of their TV viewing is done out-of-home. Because they have almost twice as many minutes of usage as the T1’s, they actually spent more time watching football content on ESPN at home than the T1 group.The TR12’s have the most varied consumption. About 60% was TV viewing, and 40% was radio listening. However, notice that although they exhibit all four of our behaviors, most of their TV viewing was done in-home, and most of their radio listening was done OOH.The T1/R12 group is pretty similar, only missing OOH TV viewing, and the distribution of minutes was pretty similar to the TR12’s.However, the T12/R2 group is most like the T12’s. 93% of their usage is TV viewing, and only 7% goes to OOH radio.The rest of the groups have a predictably varied mix of usage.
  27. What kinds of viewers and listeners are in each of these groups? If we line up the top five groups by gender, we see that the TV-only groups have the largest proportion of female viewers, and the groups with radio usage and more OOH consumption have a higher male composition, which fits what we saw earlier about platform use and location by demo.
  28. Now the five groups are ranked roughly by increasing age. The T1’s have a mix of younger and older viewers, and the smallest percent of middle-aged respondents. As we add more radio, and more OOH use, we get a higher percent of Persons 25+ and Persons 25-49.