A presentation entitled Following the Sports Fan with Arbitron’s PPM, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. A study using Arbitron Portable People Meter™ (PPM™) service was presented. The presentation was given by Glenn Enoch- VP, Integrated Media Research at ESPN Inc., Kelly Johnson- Director, Media and Promotion Research at ESPN Inc., & Lung Huang- VP, National Account Services at Arbitron Inc.
A presentation on new ad models, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. Dr. Duane Varan-Executive Director at Audience Research Labs Murdoch University gave the presentation. Varan presented studies done by the Beyond 30 research program.
As part of the emerging new topics series, a presentation entitled UX: The User Experience Cross-Screen, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. A research study including questions, methods, and findings on cross-screen users was presented. The presentation was given by, Richard Zackon-Facilitator for Council for Research Excellence & Rick Ducey- Chief Strategy Officer at BIA/Kelsey.
A presentation entitled MAXIMIZING MOMENTUM: Insights from Verizon, SMG & Cisco, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference. Insights on Brand building were presented. Presenters included Patrick McLean-Executive Director at Verizon Interactive, Helen Katz-SVP/Research Director at Starcom MediaVest Group, & Charlie Treadwell-Marketing Strategy Manager Corporate Affairs Marketing at Cisco.
In a ubiquitous world:
As we enter the third wave of computing known a UbiComp, technology will shrink in size, increase in power and ultimately disappear into the background of our every day lives. A whole new infrastructure will see using miniature remotely powered wireless computers interfaced with sensors as opposed to keyboards. As RFID gets set to link every product on the planet to the Net through near field communication and GPS, it will allow the collation of unparalleled levels of data of consumer habits both in and out of the home. Always connected and always aware, privacy could become a thing of the past. What does this mean for the future of contextual and location-based advertising; where are we at and what can we expect? Will this finally bring the utopia that is being sought by marketers to answer conclusively which 50% of their media dollars are being wasted - and if so at what price to humanity? The writing is on the wall...
See http://NothingToHide.Us
A presentation on new ad models, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. Dr. Duane Varan-Executive Director at Audience Research Labs Murdoch University gave the presentation. Varan presented studies done by the Beyond 30 research program.
As part of the emerging new topics series, a presentation entitled UX: The User Experience Cross-Screen, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. A research study including questions, methods, and findings on cross-screen users was presented. The presentation was given by, Richard Zackon-Facilitator for Council for Research Excellence & Rick Ducey- Chief Strategy Officer at BIA/Kelsey.
A presentation entitled MAXIMIZING MOMENTUM: Insights from Verizon, SMG & Cisco, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference. Insights on Brand building were presented. Presenters included Patrick McLean-Executive Director at Verizon Interactive, Helen Katz-SVP/Research Director at Starcom MediaVest Group, & Charlie Treadwell-Marketing Strategy Manager Corporate Affairs Marketing at Cisco.
In a ubiquitous world:
As we enter the third wave of computing known a UbiComp, technology will shrink in size, increase in power and ultimately disappear into the background of our every day lives. A whole new infrastructure will see using miniature remotely powered wireless computers interfaced with sensors as opposed to keyboards. As RFID gets set to link every product on the planet to the Net through near field communication and GPS, it will allow the collation of unparalleled levels of data of consumer habits both in and out of the home. Always connected and always aware, privacy could become a thing of the past. What does this mean for the future of contextual and location-based advertising; where are we at and what can we expect? Will this finally bring the utopia that is being sought by marketers to answer conclusively which 50% of their media dollars are being wasted - and if so at what price to humanity? The writing is on the wall...
See http://NothingToHide.Us
this is based on JNVU jodhpur for BCA student
prepared by :
Assistant Professor
Gajendra Jinagr
for more update connected with me 9166304153(whatsapp+)
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architectureaccount inactive
Delivering the Best Web Experience for Embedded Devices.
Presentation held during Qt Developer Days 2009.
http://qt.nokia.com/developer/learning/elearning
This is a presentation I created while working at a marketing firm to educate colleagues on podcasting. This was done in September of 05, a time when "podcast" was a hot buzz word in the marketing space, but very few people actually knew what it meant. The aim of this presentation was to give my colleagues the information they needed to discuss this new technology with confidence, at a time when there was very little industry familiarity with the channel itself. I used casual, approachable examples and simplified visuals to communicate these concepts.
Insights from Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement (CIMM) were presented at Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference, held in 2011. Through the use of eDiaries and the example of moms, a presentation was given on the value of USA touchpoints to increase ROI. Presenters included Jane Clarke-Managing Director of Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement & Jim Spaeth-Partner at Media Behavior Institute.
More Related Content
Similar to Following the Sports Fan with Arbitron’s PPM
this is based on JNVU jodhpur for BCA student
prepared by :
Assistant Professor
Gajendra Jinagr
for more update connected with me 9166304153(whatsapp+)
Accelerating performance on Qt and WebKit for the MIPS architectureaccount inactive
Delivering the Best Web Experience for Embedded Devices.
Presentation held during Qt Developer Days 2009.
http://qt.nokia.com/developer/learning/elearning
This is a presentation I created while working at a marketing firm to educate colleagues on podcasting. This was done in September of 05, a time when "podcast" was a hot buzz word in the marketing space, but very few people actually knew what it meant. The aim of this presentation was to give my colleagues the information they needed to discuss this new technology with confidence, at a time when there was very little industry familiarity with the channel itself. I used casual, approachable examples and simplified visuals to communicate these concepts.
Insights from Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement (CIMM) were presented at Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference, held in 2011. Through the use of eDiaries and the example of moms, a presentation was given on the value of USA touchpoints to increase ROI. Presenters included Jane Clarke-Managing Director of Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement & Jim Spaeth-Partner at Media Behavior Institute.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011, a Keynote presentation was given entitled Meeting the Challenges of Cross Media Research. Google presented three initiatives and how they are trying to help meet the challenges of cross media research. Keynote presenters from Google were Owen Charlebois-Global Manager, Advertising, Marketing and Media Research & ElissaLee, Ph.D.-Group Manager,Quantitative Measurement.
A presentation entitled Impact of Online and Television Advertising on Consumer Behavior, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. The presentation includes, the challenges to measuring cross-platform media impacts, comscore methods, case studies and results. Presenters included Joan FitzGerald-Vice President of comScore & Alan Vaughn- Statistical Analyst at comScore.
A presentation entitled BrandLife – Showing the Client What to Do Visually and What to Avoid was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. The Interpretation of visual Semiotic “Answers” is presented. The presentation is given by Steve Wolf- Commercial Director, Global Qualitative & SVP/Division Director at Synovate Qualitative.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011, a presentation was given on Facebook’s information platform. The job of research team at Facebook along with the topic of making research interesting to users is discussed. The presentation is given by Brad Smallwood-Head of Measurement and Insights at Facebook
A presentation entitled The Television Audience Redefined: An Update, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. Insights into the profiles of various consumers across a variety of media platforms, was presented. The presentation was given by David Poltrack-Chief Research Officer of CBS Corporation & President of CBS Vision.
A presentation entitled Measuring the Moving Screen: The Future of Tablet Measurement, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. A presentation was given on the profile tablet users as well as the findings regarding ad effectiveness on iPads vs iPhones and other devices. The presentation was given by Matt O’Grady- EVP, Media Audience Measurement at The Nielsen Company.
A presentation entitled Integrated Social Media: Business Impact Study 2011, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference. The presentation explores the impact that social media has on sales. Presenters included Irfan Kamal- SVP, Digital/Social at Ogilvy & Dr. Walter Carl- Founder and Chief Research Officer at ChatThreads.
A presentation entitled Global Perspectives on Measurement Issues, was given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. Presenters included Horst Stipp-EVP, Global Business Strategy at the Advertising Research Foundation & LuizG. Duarte, Ph.D.-Corporate Research at DIRECTV Latin America.
A presentation entitled Insights for the Future of Online Video Commercialization given at the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) AM 6.0 conference held in 2011. Test on online commercial viewing done by TBS was presented. The presentation included the research design and methods used as well as the findings. The presentation was given by Stacey Lynn Schulman-SVP, Ad Sales & Sports Research at Turner Broadcasting Sales, Inc.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled New Shopper Journeys: The Influence of Digital Touchpoints. The presentation explores how digital has an effect on shopper’s behaviors. Presentation is given by Alex Charlton- Director at essential research, Mike Hess- EVP of Research at Carat N.A., & Beth Uyenco- Global Research Director at Microsoft.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled Supercharging the Path to Purchase: Using Word-of-Mouth to Drive More Consumers to Buy. The presentation looks at the effects of Word of Mouth advertising as it relates to female consumers. Presenters include Ed Keller-CEO of Keller Fay Group & Tony Cardinale-EVP, Brand Planning & Strategic Insights at NBC Universal.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled SHOPPER INSIGHTS. Ashmeed Ali-Senior Manager at Yahoo! & David Gill-Vice President at The Nielsen Company discussed when Mobile Goes Shopping. This presentation explored how consumers use their mobiles to research products and advertising on mobile devices. Manila Austin-Director of Research at Communispace Corporation moderated the discussion.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled The Power of Relevancy The Biometric Impact of Online Advertising. The presentation includes topics such as measuring the biological impact, and the contextual and personal relevancy of ads. The presenters include Tony Marlow-Strategic Insights at YAHOO! & Brian Levine-President of Innerscope Research.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled Understanding the Relationship Between Social Media and TV Viewership. The presentation used a case study on the World cup to present findings. Presenters included, Jon Gibs-SVP at The Nielsen Company & David Coletti-VP at ESPN.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled Study of the Key Drivers of Online Content Consumption. An AOL sponsored study to better understand content usage was presented. Presenters included, Kristin Kovner- Senior Marketing Director at AOL, Bill Ziff-Levine-Principal & Co-Founder Data & Management at Counsel, Inc., & Jon Stewart- Research Director at Nielsen.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled, Identifying Maximum Impact Media Placement Strategies II: When Money Moves to Digital, Where Should it Go? Research done on the effectiveness of digital marketing along with key findings was presented by Anne Hunter-VP, Advertising Effectiveness at comScore.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled, What Consumers Really Think: Neurometric Response to Advertising in iPad® Magazines. EmSense technology was used to measured consumer responses such as eye tracking and neuro-scientific responses. Use of a bio-sensory involvement map was presented on. The presentation included examples for iPad® Magazines and Korean Air. The presenters included, Betsy Frank-Chief Research & Insights Officer at Time Inc., Elissa Moses-Chief Analytics at EmSense Corporation, & Michael Haggerty-SVP, US Director, Research & Marketing Accountability at Universal McCann.
At the Advertising Research Foundation’s (ARF) 2011 annual re:think convention, a key issues forum presentation was held entitled Real-Time Capture of Consumer Brand Encounters for 360°Media Optimization and Consumer Insights. The presentation offers insights about brand marketing. Dr. Walter Carl-Founder, Chief Research Officer of ChatThreads gives the presentation.
More from The Advertising Research Foundation (20)
B2B payments are rapidly changing. Find out the 5 key questions you need to be asking yourself to be sure you are mastering B2B payments today. Learn more at www.BlueSnap.com.
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesAurelien Domont, MBA
This Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit was created by ex-McKinsey, Deloitte and BCG Management Consultants, after more than 5,000 hours of work. It is considered the world's best & most comprehensive Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit. It includes all the Frameworks, Best Practices & Templates required to successfully undertake the Digital Transformation of your organization and define a robust IT Strategy.
Editable Toolkit to help you reuse our content: 700 Powerpoint slides | 35 Excel sheets | 84 minutes of Video training
This PowerPoint presentation is only a small preview of our Toolkits. For more details, visit www.domontconsulting.com
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024FelixPerez547899
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemAggregage
https://www.productmanagementtoday.com/frs/26903918/understanding-user-needs-and-satisfying-them
We know we want to create products which our customers find to be valuable. Whether we label it as customer-centric or product-led depends on how long we've been doing product management. There are three challenges we face when doing this. The obvious challenge is figuring out what our users need; the non-obvious challenges are in creating a shared understanding of those needs and in sensing if what we're doing is meeting those needs.
In this webinar, we won't focus on the research methods for discovering user-needs. We will focus on synthesis of the needs we discover, communication and alignment tools, and how we operationalize addressing those needs.
Industry expert Scott Sehlhorst will:
• Introduce a taxonomy for user goals with real world examples
• Present the Onion Diagram, a tool for contextualizing task-level goals
• Illustrate how customer journey maps capture activity-level and task-level goals
• Demonstrate the best approach to selection and prioritization of user-goals to address
• Highlight the crucial benchmarks, observable changes, in ensuring fulfillment of customer needs
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptxJeremyPeirce1
Discover the top mailing list providers in the USA, offering targeted lists, segmentation, and analytics to optimize your marketing campaigns and drive engagement.
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
1. Following the Sports Fan with
Arbitron’s PPM
Glenn Enoch Kelly Johnson Lung Huang
VP, Integrated Director, Media and VP, National
Media Research Promotion Research Account Services
ESPN, Inc. ESPN, Inc. Arbitron Inc.
2. Arbitron, Inc.
• Media and market research company founded
over 50 years ago
• Currently measuring media in over 280+ markets
in the U. S. and Puerto Rico.
• One of the two companies selected by the
Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement
(CIMM) for a three-screen test
2
3. Overview
• A ESPN and Arbitron November 2010 study measured
consumption on ESPN national cable television and radio:
– Football games and studio programs on TV
• ESPN
• ESPN2
• ESPNews
– ESPN local radio stations (Total Day)
• Arbitron reported:
– In-home estimates
– Out-of-home estimates
– Platform duplication
3
4. PPM Measurement
• The study leveraged data collected by the Arbitron Portable
People Meter™ (PPM™) service.
– Panel of 42,000 consumers in 39 markets
– Panelists carry a cell-phone-like device that automatically and
continuously captures a panelist’s exposure to encoded, audio-based
media, no matter where it occurs.
4
5. How the PPM Service Works
1. PPM encoding 2. The meter, worn by individuals, 3. Data collected by
solution identifies stores all acoustically captured the meter are sent
broadcast and encoded audio signals that these to Arbitron
online content consumers are exposed to
5
6. Why Radio?
Radio
Radio
16%
24%
76%
84%
Percent of Minutes Percent of Minutes
Total Media Use ESPN Media Use
Source: Nielsen, Arbitron, comScore, MRI
Avg Month 4Q 2009
6
7. • Move Cross-Platform Research from a special
project to a standard practice
• Inform media plans with predictive measures
and consumer insights
• Link to existing media currencies and ad
performance research
7
8. Minute-Stacking is Easy
ESPN/ABC World Cup Gross Viewing
(Minutes, Millions)
34,237
942 948
2,970 Digital = 17% Lift
ESPN Mobile
ESPN3.com
29,377 ESPN.com
TV Matches
Source: Nielsen (TV), Omniture (Digital)
8
9. Net Reach is Hard
Mobile Internet
TV
Audio Print
9
10. Getting Minutes From User Segments
Is Even Harder
Audio+Internet
29 minutes
TV Only
30 minutes
Five Platforms
45 minutes
TV+Audio+
Internet
38 minutes
TV+Int+
Mob+Print
TV + Mobile 41 minutes
34 minutes
10
11. Our Approach to Cross-Media Analysis
Break users down into Account for their usage
cells of media use of each medium
(Behavioral Segmentation)
A B C D
A B C D A
B
6
4
C 1
AB AC AD D
AB 3 5
8
AC 1 9
BC BD CD AD
BC
4
3 7
4
BD 6 1
ABCACD BCD ABD CD 5 9
ABC 6 5 8
AB ACD 4 4 7
BCD 7 2 6
CD ABD 5 2 8
21
a/k/a “Research Sudoku”
11
12. Four Elements of Arbitron Project
TV In-Home
Radio Out-of-Home
12
13. 15 User/Usage Cells
T: TV R: Radio
T1/R2 R1/T2
TR1
T1 R1
1: In Home T12/R1 T1/R12
T12 TR12 R12
2: Out of Home T12/R2 T2/R12
T2 TR2 R2
T1 TV Only, In Home Only TR1 TV and Radio, In Home Only T12/R1 No OOH Radio
T2 TV Only, Out of Home Only TR2 TV and Radio, OOH Only T12/R2 No In Home Radio
R1 Radio Only, In Home Only T12 TV Only, In Home and OOH T1/R12 No OOH TV
R2 Radio Only, Out of Home Only R12 Radio Only, In Home and OOH T2/R12 No In Home TV
T1/R2 TV In Home, Radio OOH R1/T2 Radio In Home, TV OOH TR12 TV and Radio, In Home and OOH
13
16. Reach By Platform
99.4
95.2
84.3
80.8
Millions
TV
41.7 43.4 Radio
Total
25.7 22.5
14.0
Persons 6+ Persons 18+ Men 18+
16
17. Shared-Exclusive Reach
Reach (Millions) Radio Exclusive Reach
• 4.2 Million Persons
99.4 • 3.5 Million Adults
4.2
84.3 • 1.8 Million Men
21.5 3.5
19.0
Radio Only
Percent of Total Users
43.4 Both
1.8 Radio Radio
73.7 12.3 TV Only Radio Exclusive Shared
61.8
Persons 6+ 26% 4% 22%
29.4 Persons 18+ 27% 4% 23%
Males 18+ 32% 4% 28%
P6+ P18+ M18+
17
18. Reach By Location
99.4
84.9 84.3
71.9
Millions
61.2
In Home
53.5
43.4 OOH
37.3
30.2 Total
Persons 6+ Persons 18+ Men 18+
18
19. Shared-Exclusive Reach
Reach (Millions) Out of Home Exclusive Reach
• 14.5 Million Persons
99.4 • 12.4 Million Adults
14.5 84.3 • 6.1 Million Men
12.4
46.7 OOH Only
Percent of Total Users
41.1 43.4 Both
Out of OOH OOH
6.1 IH Only Home Exclusive Shared
24.1 Persons 6+ 62% 15% 47%
38.2 30.8 Persons 18+ 63% 15% 48%
13.2
Males 18+ 69% 14% 55%
P6+ P18+ M18+
19
20. Reach By Platform By Location
TV Radio
15% 16%
26%
44%
41%
58%
In-Home Only IH+OOH OOH Only In-Home Only IH+OOH OOH Only
20
21. OOH TV/Radio Add Reach
ESPN Content Reach (P18+ 000) 1,470
3,498 Exclusive Reach
10,505 15.5 million (+23%)
68,800
OOH TV+Radio Only
40,347
44,998 Radio Only
OOH TV Only
22,468
28,453 IH TV+Other
IH TV Only
In-Home TV OOH TV Radio
P18+ (000)
21
22. Why Time Is Important
Platform Location
4% 1% 2%
15%
22%
43%
47% 74%
Radio Only OOH Only
Both Both
74% TV Only IH Only
55%
38%
24%
Users% Usage% Users% Usage%
22
23. Time Spent with TV, Radio
Multiplatform Users Have Greater Time Spent
ESPN Content – Persons 18+ (h:mm/month)
TV Radio Total
TV Only 4:37 4:37
Radio Only 1:41 1:41
TV + Radio 7:57 4:31 12:28
TV + Radio% 64% 36%
23
24. Time Spent by Location
Multilocation Users Have Greater Time Spent
ESPN Content – Persons 18+ (h:mm/month)
In Out of
Total
Home Home
In Home Only 3:51 3:51
Out of Home Only 0:44 0:44
In Home + OOH 7:11 2:33 9:44
In Home + OOH % 74% 26%
24
25. Percent of Minutes by Platform/Location
10%
7%
In Home TV
11% OOH TV
In-Home Radio
OOH Radio
73%
25
26. Lift over In-Home TV
“Beyond the Ratings”
31.7 +40%
5.5 24%
3.6 16%
Radio
OOH TV
In-Home TV 22.6
Minutes (Billions)
Lift over IH TV
26
27. Audience Composition
Gender Age
Total Mins 70% 30% Total Mins 19% 42% 39%
OOH TV 66% 34% IH TV 23% 46% 31%
IH TV 69% 31% OOH TV 21% 41% 38%
IH Radio 76% 24% OOH Radio 8% 51% 41%
OOH Radio 85% 15% IH Radio 10% 35% 55%
Male Female P6-24 P25-49 P50+
27
34. Summary
• Arbitron
– Passive electronic measurement of TV and radio
– Ability to distinguish in-home and out-of-home usage
– Large sample size
• ESPN
– Users/Usage analysis: Behavioral segmentation with minutes
– Fit Arbitron project into larger ESPN XP initiative
– Both TV and Radio content during month
34
35. Summary
• Created a “usage pie”
– 73% of usage was in-home TV
– Radio = 17%
– OOH = 21%
• TV mostly in-home users (41% both in-home/OOH)
• Radio mostly OOH users (58% both in-home/OOH)
• Radio and out-of-home contribute greater P25+ and P25-49
audiences
• Multiplatform and multilocation users are heavier consumers
of ESPN content
35
36. Summary
• The four elements (Radio, TV, In-Home, Out-of-Home) produce
15 user/usage cells
• Five of the cells contribute 77% of users, 92% of usage
• Able to measure exclusive Reach and usage from Radio and
out-of-home
– Radio Only = 4.2 million persons
– Out-of-Home Only = 14.5 million persons
– Radio or OOH TV vs In-Home TV:
• Reach = 15.5 million persons (+23%)
• Minutes = 9.1 billion minutes (+40%)
36
Why is ESPN interested in radio? A better question might be, why isn’t everybody interested in radio? We calculated about a year and a half ago that perhaps a quarter of all media use in a day is radio listening, and one out of every six minutes spent with ESPN was done through radio. Now, this is a combination of sources and methodologies, and the proportions would be somewhat different if we did the same exercise today, but the point is that radio is roughly comparable to the Internet in terms of both users and minutes, yet the email newsletters I get talk about digital media every day, and rarely about radio.At ESPN, we understand that radio represents an enormous amount of usage by sports fans and is a critical channel of information about the sports they follow. We were glad to have the opportunity to get a look at use of ESPN content on both TV and radio during football season.ESPN Radio is also a way for us to connect with our fans locally.
This project is part of our ESPN XP initiative. ESPN XP, which was originally announced at the ARF Re:Think conference in March 2010, encompasses all of our cross-platform research. It has three main goals: to move cross-platform research from a special project (it is clearly still a special project!) to a standard practice, shared sources and methods across the industry. Second, to help advertisers and agencies to create media plans that follow consumers throughout the day, on the best available platform. Third, we are not trying to replace existing currencies, we are trying to get them to work together.
Now, if all we wanted to do was know how people were spending their time on various media platforms, that would be pretty easy. We could take minutes from those existing measures, and stack them up. We did that during our first ESPN XP project, researching the 2010 World Cup. Here, we took gross minutes of viewing from our Nielsen-measured in-home TV audiences, and added gross minutes of viewing from our digital platforms, as measured by Omniture. This shows a lift of 17% in time spent with ESPN. If all we care about is minutes, that’s easy!
What’s hard in the field of cross-platform research is how the various users of each platform overlap. How many TV viewers use the Internet in a day? How many digital media users are Internet-Only, Mobile-Only, or use both? There are lot of ways for these groups to intersect, and our existing measures can’t really help us here.
What’s even harder is to get an accurate read on the overlapping user groups, and then figure out how they contribute to the minutes of usage!
Yet, that has been our approach to cross-platform research from the beginning, even before ESPN XP. First, we break the users down into their cells of media use (create a behavioral segmentation). In this case, imagine that A is TV, B is Radio, C is Internet and D is Mobile. A person could use TV only, or Radio only, or Internet Only or Mobile Only; or, could use TV plus Radio, TV plus Internet, TV plus Mobile….Then, we take these discrete user groups and account for their usage of each medium. How much time does the TV plus Radio user spend with TV, and with Radio? ….and so on.
The project we did with Arbitron on football consumption had four basic elements: viewing to TV, and listening to radio, in-home use of media and out-of-home usage of media.
Those four elements overlap to produce 15 user/usage cells. In this diagram, T is TV viewing, R is radio listening, 1 is in-home usage and 2 is out-of-home usage. So, the “T1” group only watched TV, and only in-home. The “R2” group only listened to radio, and only did so out-of-home. The “T12” group only watched TV, and did so both in-home and out-of-home. The “T12/R2” group watched TV in home and out of home, and also listened to radio out of home (but not in-home). The TR12 group, in the middle, showed used both platforms in both locations.
This is not to be confused with R2D2.
Arbitron was successful in breaking their sample into the 15 discrete user groups, and accounting for their usage of ESPN TV and radio programming. This table is a little complex, so let’s examine the results of the study one step at a time…
…starting with the Users of each platform. Arbitron showed that 95 million persons watched football programs on ESPN, and 26 million listened to ESPN radio affiliates. Our net Reach over the month was 99 million. (And so forth for different demos.)
Now, we’re looking at shared and exclusive Reach over the two platforms. Still the same 99 million net users, but here we see that 74 million only watched ESPN on TV, 4 million only listened on radio, and 22 million used both TV and radio.So, radio provides ESPN with an exclusive reach of 4.2 million persons, 3.5 million adults, and 1.8 million adult men, over what we deliver on TV. Or, to look at it a different way, between one-quarter and one-third of panelists listened to our radio programming, and most of those were also TV viewers.
The other two elements of the project dealt with location, in-home and out-of-home. Again, the same 99 million net users, but we’re showing that 85 million used our content in the home, and 61 million were using the content out-of-home.
This is shared and exclusive Reach by location. Among our 99 million net audience, 38 million only consumed our content in-home, 15 million only consumed out-of-home, and the largest group (47 million) consumed both in-home and out-of-home.In other words, out-of-home consumption provides ESPN with an exclusive reach of 14.5 million persons, 12.4 million adults, and 6.1 million adult men, over what we deliver in-home. Between 60-70 percent of panelists showed out-of-home consumption, and about half of them showed both in-home and out-of-home behavior.
Now, let’s put platform and location together. Our TV Reach was 95 million persons. Most of these (85%) showed in-home consumption — just 15% viewed TV in out-of-home locations only. The in-home viewers were split pretty evenly between those who only viewed in-home, and those who viewed both in-home and out-of-home.Our radio Reach was 26 million persons. Most of these (84%) showed out-of-home consumption — just 16% listened to radio in in-home locations only. The out-of-home Only group was just a quarter of listeners, most people listened to radio both in-home and out-of-home.
Finally, let’s look at incremental Reach in a different way. The Arbitron study showed that we reach 69 million adults through in-home TV viewing, and 45 million through out-of-home TV viewing. We also have a reach of 23 million through radio.Our 69 million Reach with in-home TV encompasses persons who view only in-home TV and those who also have other behaviors. However, this project shows that persons who only consume ESPN content through out-of-home TV viewing, or radio, add an exclusive Reach of 15.5 million persons — a lift of 23% over our in-home TV Reach.
We mentioned at the start of our talk that the hardest thing to do is to derive minutes of usage from discrete groups of users. However, time is the most important element of the analysis, for this reason:We have already shown that multi-platform users represent 22% of our net Reach, and that multi-location users represent 47% of the net Reach.However, that 22% of multi-platform users account for 43% of total minutes of usage, and that 47% of multi-location users account for 74% of total minutes of usage. These two groups of users are pulling much more than their weight in minutes of usage.
The reason that multiplatform users have a greater share of usage is that they are spending more time viewing and listening. The Arbitron data show that the average multiplatform user spent 12 and a half hours with our content, far more than persons who only viewed us on TV or only listened on radio.They’re not only spending more time because they are using two platforms — the multiplatform user is spending almost twice as much time watching TV than the TV-only user, and almost three times as much time listening to radio than the radio-only user.
Same thing with themultilocation user, who is averaging 9 hours 44 minutes with our content, far more than the in-home-only user and the out-of-home-only user. Again, the multilocation user is spending almost twice as much time consuming media in the home compared to the in-home-only user, and over three times as much time consuming media out of home as the out-of-home-only user.
So now let’s leave users behind and look at a simple pie of usage. According to the Arbitron study, about three-quarters of our gross minutes of usage came from in-home TV. Out-of-home consumption of TV and radio accounted for 21% of all minutes.As we started, we talked about how important radio was to ESPN, accounting for 16% of total consumption, and here we see that it accounted for 17% of all minutes in this study.
A couple of slides ago, we showed how out-of-home TV and radio added 23% to the reach of in-home TV alone. They not only add users, they also add usage. Here, we see that OOH TV and radio add 40% lift over our in-home TV minutes. Like all of our ESPN XP projects, this helps us quantify our audience “beyond the ratings.”
What are the differences between these user/usage groups? One way we can assess this is by looking at audience composition by gender and age. In the left-hand graph, you see that radio has a larger proportion of males than TV. We also found that OOH TV has the greatest proportion of females — we theorize that this is groups of friends getting together in locations where football coverage is on. OOH radio has the greatest proportion of males, and we think that this is consumption by men in cars or at work, while in-home consumption of radio may be more likely to include female family members.In the right-hand graph, you see that radio has fewer kids and teens, and a larger proportion of middle-aged and older adults, compared to TV. In-Home TV has the largest proportion of persons aged 6-17, because they are more likely to use TV than terrestrial radio and because they are more likely to be consuming in-home with other family members. OOH radio has the largest proportion of persons aged 25-49 while in-home radio has the largest proportion of persons aged 50+. This reflects greater out-of-home location and opportunity for middle-aged persons — clearly older persons are more likely to be in-home listeners.
Now we’re back to our original table. Still pretty daunting…
…so let’s rank the groups by the percent of usage that they account for. The top five cells account for 77% of all users, and 92% of the usage of the ESPN content that was measured in this study.
The top group is the T12’s – the group that watches TV both in-home and out-of-home, but did not listen to radio. They are a large group, making up over a quarter of all users, and they have above-average usage (426 minutes vs 352 min average), so they account for almost a third of the usage of ESPN content.The second group is the TR12’s, who use both TV and radio, both in-home and out-of-home. They are a relatively small group (8% of users) but have the heaviest usage of any group, averaging 1106 minutes each, so they end up doing almost a quarter of the usage.#3 is the T1’s, who only have in-home TV usage. They are the largest group in terms of users, but they have below-average usage (221 minsvs 352 mins), so although they are over a third of users, they have about a fifth of the usage.The next two groups have both TV and radio usage, and mix of in-home and OOH. They are small in the number of users, but have very high usage, so they pull more than their weight in terms of usage.Then there are the remaining ten groups, who have a lot of persons but very little usage.
Now let’s look at each of the groups, and where their usage comes from. The T1’s are the easiest – 100% of their minutes come from in-home TV viewing.The T12’s are pretty similar, except about one-fifth of their TV viewing is done out-of-home. Because they have almost twice as many minutes of usage as the T1’s, they actually spent more time watching football content on ESPN at home than the T1 group.The TR12’s have the most varied consumption. About 60% was TV viewing, and 40% was radio listening. However, notice that although they exhibit all four of our behaviors, most of their TV viewing was done in-home, and most of their radio listening was done OOH.The T1/R12 group is pretty similar, only missing OOH TV viewing, and the distribution of minutes was pretty similar to the TR12’s.However, the T12/R2 group is most like the T12’s. 93% of their usage is TV viewing, and only 7% goes to OOH radio.The rest of the groups have a predictably varied mix of usage.
What kinds of viewers and listeners are in each of these groups? If we line up the top five groups by gender, we see that the TV-only groups have the largest proportion of female viewers, and the groups with radio usage and more OOH consumption have a higher male composition, which fits what we saw earlier about platform use and location by demo.
Now the five groups are ranked roughly by increasing age. The T1’s have a mix of younger and older viewers, and the smallest percent of middle-aged respondents. As we add more radio, and more OOH use, we get a higher percent of Persons 25+ and Persons 25-49.