BEST ✨ Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ✔️ 9871031762 ✔️ Escorts Service...
Firo b
1. FIRO-B
Fundamental
Interpersonal
Relations
Orientation
Behavior
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
2. History
1958 Will Schutz, Ph.D.
Submarine Personnel
1978 Consulting Psychologists
Press
1996 Revised Self-Scorable
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
3. Self-Awareness = Key
Personal/Professional Development
Employee/Management Relations
Career Development
Team Building
Leadership Development
Emotional Intelligence
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
4. FIRO-B
The Six Basics:
Expressed Inclusion (eI)
Wanted Inclusion (wI)
Expressed Control (eC)
Wanted Control (wC)
Expressed Affection (eA)
Wanted Affection (wA)
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
5. Your FIRO-B Results: How to
Score the Self-Scorable
Inclusion Control Affection
• recognition • influence • closeness
• belonging • leading • warmth
• participation • responsibility • sensitivity
Expressed
Behavior
eI eC eA
TOTAL
• what I prefer to do EXPRESSED
• how much I initiate eI+eC+eA
• observable action
Wanted
wI wC wA
TOTAL
Behavior WANTED
• how much I want
others to initiate wI+wC+wA
• how much I prefer
to be the recipient
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL OVERALL
INCLUSION CONTROL AFFECTION expressed
+
eI+wI eC+wC eA+wA wanted
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
6. How Others May See You
Inclusion
High Wanted Inclusion
1. May take rejection as
devastating.
2. May think being away is
missing the action.
3. May take lack of
acknowledgment as negative
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
7. How Others May See You
Inclusion
Low Wanted Inclusion
1. May feel invitations are
obligations.
2. May not want to be singled
out.
3. May consider group time
wasteful.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
8. How Others May See You
Affection
High Wanted Affection
1. May find a lack of concern
as insensitive
2. May need continuous
feedback.
3. May find distance from
others a personal loss.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
9. How Others May See You
Affection
Low Wanted Affection
1. May find reassurances as
superficial
2. May become offended by
personal questions.
3. May find emotions as
distracting - even your own.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
10. How Others May See You
Control
High Wanted Control
1. May perceive any
structuring as inadequate
2. May consider standard
procedures as important
3. May take sole
responsibility as burdensome
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
11. How Others May See You
Control
Low Wanted Control
1. May not want any control.
2. May feel pressured by
plans and stressed by
structure.
3. May find competitive
behavior annoying.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
12. FIRO-B
An instrument for emotional
intelligence awareness
Self-Awareness
Communication
Building Relationships
Conflict Management
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
13. FIRO-B
What it does:
Aids in understanding one’s
behavior and its effect on others
Increases your awareness of your
natural strengths and weaknesses
Suggests possibilities for
improving the way you relate to
others
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
14. FIRO-B
When to use it:
Almost anytime - It is short,
quick to take and score, and
surprisingly insightful. It is
often used to compliment other
instruments.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
15. Learning Objectives
History
Theory
FIRO-B Model
Administration & Interpretation
Guidelines
results = strengths
patterns
Application Exercises
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
16. Learning Objectives (cont.)
Case Studies
personal relationship growth
team building
career development
management development
Research
organizational
correlations with the MBTI®
Tools for Interpretation
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
17. Theory
Individual Motivated by THREE
Interpersonal Needs
Inclusion: the amount of belonging,
attention, and recognition desired in
social settings.
Control: the level of influence,
structure, and responsibility desired.
Affection:
the level of rapport, warmth,
and support desired.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
18. Theory
The FIRO-B helps give insight into a
client’s degree of interpersonal
understanding on several levels:
Inclusion: The willingness to include
others or be included.
Control:The willingness to manage
and be managed.
Affection: The willingness to express
and receive affection
The Flexibility to know when to call
these things into play.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
19. Theory
Group Development
Inclusion Issues
Control Issues
Affection Issues
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
20. Theory
Group Development
Should I go for
a boat ride?
Who is running the motor?
What is my relationship
to others on the boat?
Self-Awareness
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
21. The FIRO-B Model: Page 4
Introduction to FIRO-B in Organizations
INCLUSION (I) CONTROL (C) AFFECTION (A)
Expressed
(e)
Wanted
(w)
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
22. The FIRO-B Model
INCLUSION (I) CONTROL (C) AFFECTION (A)
Expressed I make an effort to include
others in my activities. I try
I try to exert control and
influence over things. I enjoy
I make an effort to get close
to people. I am comfortable
(e) to belong, to join social organizing things and expressing personal feelings
groups— to be with people directing others. and I try to be supportive of
as much as possible. others.
Wanted
(w)
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
23. The FIRO-B Model
INCLUSION (I) CONTROL (C) AFFECTION (A)
Expressed
(e)
I want other people to invite I feel most comfortable I want others to act warmly
me to belong. I enjoy it when working in well-defined toward me. I enjoy it when
others notice me. situations. I try to get clear people share their feelings
expectations and instructions. with me and when they
Wanted encourage my efforts.
(w)
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
24. The FIRO-B Model
INCLUSION (I) CONTROL (C) AFFECTION (A)
I make an effort to include I try to exert control and I make an effort to get close
Expressed others in my activities. I try influence over things. I enjoy to people. I am comfortable
(e) to belong, to join social
groups— to be with people
organizing things and
directing others.
expressing personal feelings
and I try to be supportive of
as much as possible. others.
I want other people to invite I feel most comfortable I want others to act warmly
me to belong. I enjoy it when working in well-defined toward me. I enjoy it when
others notice me. situations. I try to get clear people share their feelings
expectations and instructions. with me and when they
Wanted encourage my efforts.
(w)
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
26. FIRO-B Administration-
General
Average time = 10 minutes
54 Items
Six questions with nine variations
Group or individual administration
Guttman scoring method
Self-scorable/on-site scoring
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
27. FIRO-B Administration-
Specific
Establish a non-threatening
atmosphere
Give an overview of the purpose
Emphasize non-
judgmental/developmental
Repetitive items yet independent
Pass it out/others sit quietly
Prediction of scores before scoring
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
28. Revised Self-Scorable (10
Minutes)
“ Some items may seem similar to
others. However, each item is
different, so please answer each one
without regard to the others or
without trying to be consistent.”
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
29. Two Dimensions of Interpersonal
Needs
Inclusion Control Affection
• recognition • influence • closeness
• belonging • leading • warmth
• participation • responsibility • sensitivity
Expressed
Behavior
• what I prefer to do
• how much I initiate
• observable action
eI eC eA
Wanted
Behavior
• how much I want
others to initiate
• how much I prefer
wI wC wA
to be the recipient
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
30. FIRO-B Individual Cell
Scores: View Your Personal
Cell Scores
eI eC eA
expresse expresse expresse
d d d
inclusio control affection
n
wI wC wA
wanted wanted wanted
inclusio control affection
n
0, 1, 2 LOW Behaviors are rarely displayed
by you
3, 4, 5, 6 MEDIUM Behaviors will be a noticeable
characteristic of you, but only
some of the time
7, 8, 9 HIGH Behaviors are a noticeable
characteristic of you in most
situations
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
31. Strength of Your Interpersonal
Needs:
Total Need Total Need Total Need
for for for
Inclusion Control Affection
Low = 0 to 5 Medium = 6 to 12 High = 13 to 18
Highest Score =
Most comfortable interpersonal area
Need area you will be the least willing to sacrifice
in social situations
Situations that satisfy this need will be those you
return to often
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
32. Total Behavior: Expressed
0 to 7 (Low)
8 to 19 (Medium)
20 to 27 High
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
33. Total Behavior: Wanted
0 to 7 (Low)
8 to 19 (Medium)
20 to 27 High
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
34. Total Behavior
Expressed Needs > Wanted
Needs
keep others at a distance to avoid unwanted
behaviors
only accept behaviors from particular people
mislead people making conclusions based on
expressed behavior
Expressed Needs < Wanted
Needs
may feel inhibited
may be dissatisfied that you are not getting what
you want
could grow attached to people who give you
what you want
Expressed = Wanted
may be cautious
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
35. Strength of Your Interpersonal Needs:
Overall Need Score (page 7)
See Bottom Right-Hand
Corner
0-15 LOW
Involvement with others not primary
source of need satisfaction.
Intellectual stimulation or solitary
pursuits predominate.
16-26 MEDIUM-LOW
Involvement sometimes a source of
satisfaction, depending on people and
context.
27-38 MEDIUM-HIGH
Involvement is usually source of
satisfaction.
39-54 HIGH
Involvement with others enjoyable
and satisfying.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
36. Patterns of Need Fulfillment--
Inclusion (page 10)
High Expressed Inclusion (eI) Low Expressed Inclusion (eI)
I include others and like to be included. I form relationships based on common
I enjoy the opportunity to provide input. interests and skills.
High Wanted I don’t like to get cut off from information I’d rather “play it safe” than let others
Inclusion (wI) and updates. know that I want to be included.
I wait for others to invite me to join them.
I get many invitations but I often turn I prefer working with a small group of
them down or don’t show up. people.
I pick and choose which company social I avoid forming too many friendships at
Low Wanted events to attend. work.
Inclusion (wI) I have a select group of people that I enjoy I may discourage invitations to company
working with. social events.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
37. Patterns of Need Fulfillment--
Control (page 11)
High Expressed Control (eC) Low Expressed Control (eC)
I like to provide structure for others. I accept control from those in authority.
I work very hard and then “kick back” and I am not interested in gaining influence.
let others run the show. I am a loyal and cooperative follower.
High Wanted
I relate well to authorities in the
Control (wC)
organization.
I enjoy taking control and being recognized. I prefer not to make important decisions.
I am uncomfortable delegating I don’t want to be closely supervised.
responsibility. I can be stubborn and rebellious.
Low Wanted I can be very competitive and demand
Control (wC) perfection from others.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
38. Patterns of Need Fulfillment--
Affection (page 11)
High Expressed Affection (eA) Low Expressed Affection (eA)
I am friendly, open, and optimistic. I believe that too much self-disclosure is
I value trustworthiness. unprofessional.
High Wanted I have difficulty controlling interruptions I know more about colleagues than they
Affection (wA) at work. know about me.
I may have difficulty saying “no” to
requests to take on more work.
I am generally friendly but I am selective I tend to be task-oriented and business-
about close relationships. like.
I use praise to motivate others but find it I feel uncomfortable with expressiveness
Low Wanted unnecessary myself. or affection at work.
Affection (wA) I limit close working relationships to a I enjoy my privacy.
select few.
B
FIRO
Consulting Psychologists Press
Editor's Notes
I changed this slightly from the one given to you in January.
Overhead with history timeline 1958 development of theory by Schutz, but remember that we do not want to emphasize him during the presentation as he now publishes and markets another instrument which he claims is better (and newer) than the FIRO-B, called “Elements ofAwareness”. Both UK and US users have told us that the Elements tests are much more difficult both for counselors to interpret and for clients to understand 1978 publication of manual by CPP 1996 resurge of research and development of product due to customer feedback of usefulness in corporations; translations in Japanese, French, and extensive use in the United Kingdom. We are alsoconducting a large scale norming study this summer/fall to collect a nationally representative sample of over 4000 (along with MBTI data and demographic data such as their opinion on stress, values, etc)
Janet did this slide for you this summer and I put it at the beginning of the presentation to help you set a context for your participants. This is also the main theme behind our promotional piece on the FIRO-B.
Janet did this slide for you this summer and I put it at the beginning of the presentation to help you set a context for your participants. This is also the main theme behind our promotional piece on the FIRO-B.
Janet did this slide for you this summer and I put it at the beginning of the presentation to help you set a context for your participants. This is also the main theme behind our promotional piece on the FIRO-B.
Janet did this slide for you this summer and I put it at the beginning of the presentation to help you set a context for your participants. This is also the main theme behind our promotional piece on the FIRO-B.
Cindee and I decided to name this slide “learning objectives” as you need that terminology if CEU credits are to be given. In any case, it can serve as your agenda and you can re-name this if it makes you more comfortable.
Al explains the Guttman scoring method as follows: Not an easy question, but here is the Cliff notes version. Basically it is a scoring method that assumes that items can be ordered from most to least difficult, or in the case of the FIRO from most to least endorsed. The more questions that you answer as you move along the order for a given scale, the more of that behavior you should manifest. It also means that although there are six response options for each FIRO item, the items are scored 0 or 1. For example, item #16 is “I try to participate in group activities” is scored on eI. If the person answers Usually, he/she gets one point for eI. If, however, he/she gives any other answer, he/she gets 0 points for eI. Because the items says “try” and the kind of group is left vague, only a “usually” response indicates eI. In contrast, however, is item #3 which says “I join social groups” which is more definite in two ways: it doesn’t say “try” and it specifies the kind of group. So, if the person says occasionally, sometimes often or usually, they get 1 point for eI. If they say rarely or never they get 0 points. Item #3 is more indicative of eI and so more responses are scored. How this is all arrived, I’m not sure I know.
Steve suggested this overhead from the presentation he did in early October.
This slide is designed to emphasize the similarity of items which will diffuse complaints about redundancy. Al suggested you give the FIRO-B at the beginning of the session and then take the participants through the history and theory information.
These scores are best explained in relation to one another, since they explain the general pattern of how you go about satisfying interpersonal needs. For example, when Expressed needs are greater, you may keep others at a distance in order to avoid receiving unwanted behaviors. When Wanted needs are greater, you may feel inhibited or be dissatisfied that you are not getting what you want from others. When the needs are equal , you may be cautious about expressing a behaviour before you are sure how the person will respond. This information is from page 8 of Introduction to FIRO-B in Organizations .
These scores are best explained in relation to one another, since they explain the general pattern of how you go about satisfying interpersonal needs. For example, when Expressed needs are greater, you may keep others at a distance in order to avoid receiving unwanted behaviors. When Wanted needs are greater, you may feel inhibited or be dissatisfied that you are not getting what you want from others. When the needs are equal , you may be cautious about expressing a behaviour before you are sure how the person will respond. This information is from page 8 of Introduction to FIRO-B in Organizations .
These scores are best explained in relation to one another, since they explain the general pattern of how you go about satisfying interpersonal needs. For example, when Expressed needs are greater, you may keep others at a distance in order to avoid receiving unwanted behaviors. When Wanted needs are greater, you may feel inhibited or be dissatisfied that you are not getting what you want from others. When the needs are equal , you may be cautious about expressing a behaviour before you are sure how the person will respond. This information is from page 8 of Introduction to FIRO-B in Organizations .
Steve also added this slide after presenting to a group.