SlideShare a Scribd company logo
FINREP
Regulatory reporting of
financial information
How ready are you?
www.pwc.com
May 2012
Background
Objectives
Key objectives of FINREP:
•	 Standardise European reporting requirements to
reduce the impact on firms of multiple regular reporting
requirements from different European supervisors;
•	 Establish a central repository for European banking
data, enabling improved risk identification and management
for cross-border institutions;
•	 Facilitate peer reviews, trend predictions, risk analysis
and provide greater transparency, especially on cross-border
firms; and
•	 Enable data to be easily shared with national and
international authorities, supervisory colleges, ESRB
and ESAs.
The Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) under
The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV contains
a mandate for the European Banking Authority (EBA)
to develop Implementing Technical Standards (ITS)
related to supervisory reporting requirements. In
response, the EBA has developed two frameworks
that will apply across Europe:
Financial Reporting Standard (FINREP) – reporting of
financial information to the regulator.
Common Reporting Standard (COREP) – reporting of
risk (Basel III) in 5 components (capital, solvency, credit
risk, operational risk and market risk).
To whom does it apply?
FINREP applies to credit
institutions reporting on
a consolidated basis.
A credit institution as defined by CRR
Article four:
An undertaking whose business is able to
receive deposits or other repayable funds
from the public and to grant credits for
its own account.
1
2
What are the impacts?
Though the standard is not final, the draft has a proposed effective date of 1 January 2013 with the first reported period
being the quarter ending 31 March 2013. The requirements are a significant increase from current financial reporting
requirements (i.e. those set out in UK FSA 001 and FSA 002) by local regulators and includes expanded scope both in
the number of templates for submission and the level of detail required:
•	 Increase to over 40 new forms/templates with over 3,500 data fields.
•	 Submissions are due within 42 calendar days of quarter end; a calendar quarter end is required.
•	 In addition to quarterly reporting, re-submission of audited figures is required (no new audit requirements,
however data must be submitted within 42 days and where a regulatory audit of the entity already occurs, the
data must be resubmitted once the audit is complete).
FINREP does not change the underlying accounting framework (there are templates for
both IFRS reporters and local GAAP reporters). However, the FINREP consultation
paper requires reporting of financial data on the entity consolidated using the CRR
scope of consolidation, which differs from the scope of consolidation under the
accounting frameworks.
Additionally, in certain cases FINREP requires information that is not required by
GAAP or that is disaggregated in a manner that differs from GAAP. For example:
•	 Disaggregation by country of counterparty for assets and by location of activity
for the income statement.
•	 Reporting of change in fair value due to credit risk for assets in the held for
trading category by asset type/counterparty type.
•	 Reporting of certain economic hedges.
•	 Consideration of tactical vs. strategic solutions – can FINREP be incorporated
into existing strategic change programs or will there need to be workarounds?
Other key considerations include:
•	 Which entities are in scope? Is data available for the entity reported under consolidated supervision?
•	 Does the current financial reporting process operate at a frequency and within a time period (within 42 days of
quarter end) that would meet the requirements? Is the quality of the data (including the quarterly data) robust
and well controlled?
•	 Regulators’ increased focus on the quality of reporting data will result in changes to the format and frequency of
the reports, and increased demand for greater assurance that the reports are accurate. FINREP will expose the
quality of pre-audited figures to the regulator as it requires submission of initial figures and resubmission of
audited figures.
•	 The proposed implementation timeframe is challenging and may coincide with other projects; institutions should
begin to understand the requirements; assess data gaps and review the current reporting process.
The reporting required is also in excess of interim disclosure
requirements. The FINREP requirements have three key impacts on
the financial reporting function and institutions will need to:
•	 Understand the new FINREP policy and requirements.
•	 Identify and source the correct data to satisfy the FINREP requirements.
•	 Develop an efficient and effective process to deliver
FINREP reporting.
FINREF policy
& requirements
Data Process
Revised drafts of the
CRR indicate the final
proposal may only apply
to IFRS reporters.
Additionally, it is
unclear whether FINREP
will be mandated by the
EBA or left to the
discretion of the
national regulators.
FINREP – Timeline
Proposed timelines of legislation and implementation
Timing may change due to changes in the final version of CRD IV, the CRR and the ITS
Q4
2011
Q1
2012
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q2Q1
2013
What changes under FINREP?
New data
requirements
New reports
and templates
More granular
data
New reporting
language
Short
timeframe to
comply
Increased
frequency of
reporting
Implementation of FINREP will be a major challenge for UK and EU banks and requires:
20-Dec-2011
EBA
Consultation
Paper CP50
issued
20-Mar-2012
End of
consultation
period
01-Jan-13
Institutional
compliance
20-Feb-2012
Public hearing
on CP50
20-Jun-12
Final draft of
Implementing
Technical
Standards
31-Mar-13
1st
Regulatory
reporting period
end
13-May-13
Submission
to national
authorities
Example of how PwC has
helped a client to gain a clear
understanding in four weeks
Client issue
The client needed to determine how best to address new financial reporting
requirements to regulators (FINREP) as drafted by the European Banking
Authority (EBA). As the client already reports extensive data to the regulators,
PwC was requested to determine the feasibility of leveraging current regulatory
reporting to meet the FINREP requirements. The client faced short deadlines
and required support with expertise and resources.
PwC approach
PwC designed an approach to analyse and interpret the FINREP requirements
and to determine the extent of overlap with current regulatory reporting.
Findings were summarised and recommendations were developed into options
for senior management. PwC also provided in depth analysis on the FINREP
policy and the approach to sourcing the required data. Furthermore, PwC
supported the client in understanding implications for the current reporting
process and considerations for tactical solutions in order to comply with
FINREP by 1 January 2013.
Client benefit
PwC helped the client to gain a clear understanding of the FINREP policy, the
granular data requirements and the significant impact on the current financial
reporting processes. The engagement enabled the client to take an informed
decision on how to comply with the FINREP requirements within the timeframe
set out by the regulators.
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the
information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the
accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers does not accept or
assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained
in this publication or for any decision based on it.
© 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. “PricewaterhouseCoopers” and “PwC” refer to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited (PwCIL). Each member firm is a separate legal entity and does not act as agent of PwCIL or any other member firm. PwCIL does not provide
any services to clients. PwCIL is not responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of any of its member firms nor can it control the exercise of their professional
judgement or bind them in any way. No member firm is responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of any other member firm nor can it control the exercise of
another member firm’s professional judgement or bind another member firm or PwCIL in any way.
120724-142213-LM-OS
www.pwc.com
How can PwC help?
Just getting started In progress
Progressed
implementation
•	 Rapid commencement of impact
analysis to identify how FINREP
will impact current financial
reporting requirements, systems,
processes, and governance.
•	 Assist with stakeholder
communication and training on
FINREP and its impact.
•	 Quickly develop a project and
resource plan to address FINREP
requirements in the necessary
time frames.
•	 Comprehensive review of your
current project plan to assess
coverage of high impact areas
including data, systems, operating
model, governance, and change
management.
•	 Review business requirements
against the latest FINREP
guidance.
•	 Review/Design of governance
structure to support FINREP
needs.
•	 Review/Design of appropriate
systems controls.
Plan and mobilise
to address FINREP
requirements
Assess your current plan
and progress and
identify any necessary
course correction
Assess readiness to go-live
on FINREP processes and
systems
•	 Review and assistance with a
comprehensive testing strategy.
•	 Independent assessment of
readiness of FINREP solutions
across systems, process, and
governance.
•	 Identify opportunities to leverage
FINREP solutions into other
finance reporting processes,
including management
information.
Where are you with FINREP?
How can PwC help?
UK Germany
Contacts
Mark Batten
Partner
Finance Consulting
+44 (0) 20 7804 3169
mark.e.batten@uk.pwc.com
Parrish Pryce-Williams
Senior Manager
Finance Consulting
+44 (0) 189 552 2555
parrish.pryce-williams@uk.pwc.com
Eddie Hodgeon
Partner
CMAS – Accounting Advisory
+44 (0) 20 72 313 1577
edmund.hodgeon@uk.pwc.com
Kristy Witkowski
Senior Manager
CMAS – Accounting Advisory
+44(0) 20 7804 7975
kristen.y.witkowski@uk.pwc.com
Ullrich Hartmann
Partner
Assurance
+49 699 585 2115
ullrich.hartmann@de.pwc.com
Friedemann Loch
Director
Assurance
+49 699 585 5228
friedemann.loch@de.pwc.com

More Related Content

What's hot

Guidance on Beneficial Ownership
Guidance on  Beneficial OwnershipGuidance on  Beneficial Ownership
Guidance on Beneficial Ownership
Ziaullah Mirza
 
Legal Audit Power Point
Legal Audit Power PointLegal Audit Power Point
Legal Audit Power Point
dja2law
 
IFRS 9 financial instruments Overview
IFRS 9 financial instruments OverviewIFRS 9 financial instruments Overview
IFRS 9 financial instruments Overview
Sohan Al Akbar
 
Camel ratings ppt
Camel ratings pptCamel ratings ppt
Camel ratings ppt
Sagar Patil
 
IFRS 10
IFRS 10IFRS 10
Asset Liability Management
Asset Liability ManagementAsset Liability Management
Asset Liability Management
Prachi Gupta
 
Regulatory framework of banks
Regulatory framework of banksRegulatory framework of banks
Regulatory framework of banks
Shaifali Mathur
 
Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109
Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109
Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109
Ernst & Young
 
Income Tax.pdf
Income Tax.pdfIncome Tax.pdf
Income Tax.pdf
Fawad Hassan
 
Herstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt Bank
Herstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt BankHerstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt Bank
Herstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt Bank
salim shadman ratul
 
IAS-1: Presentation of Financial Statements
IAS-1: Presentation of Financial StatementsIAS-1: Presentation of Financial Statements
IAS-1: Presentation of Financial Statements
Amit Sarkar
 
ARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instruments
ARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instrumentsARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instruments
ARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instruments
Tony Mason, FCCA
 
Portfolio management
Portfolio managementPortfolio management
Portfolio management
Suparna Pani
 
Ifrs 9
Ifrs 9Ifrs 9
Ifrs 9
Amit Dharnia
 
Asset Liability Management
Asset Liability ManagementAsset Liability Management
Asset Liability Management
shailesh kediya
 
IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)
IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)
IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)
Shubham Verma
 
Accrual ipsas
Accrual ipsasAccrual ipsas
Accrual ipsas
Chidananda Jena
 
Ind as 7
Ind as 7Ind as 7
Ind as 7
Mohit Goyal
 

What's hot (20)

Guidance on Beneficial Ownership
Guidance on  Beneficial OwnershipGuidance on  Beneficial Ownership
Guidance on Beneficial Ownership
 
Legal Audit Power Point
Legal Audit Power PointLegal Audit Power Point
Legal Audit Power Point
 
IFRS 9 financial instruments Overview
IFRS 9 financial instruments OverviewIFRS 9 financial instruments Overview
IFRS 9 financial instruments Overview
 
Risk Based Supervision
Risk Based SupervisionRisk Based Supervision
Risk Based Supervision
 
Camel ratings ppt
Camel ratings pptCamel ratings ppt
Camel ratings ppt
 
IFRS 10
IFRS 10IFRS 10
IFRS 10
 
Asset Liability Management
Asset Liability ManagementAsset Liability Management
Asset Liability Management
 
Regulatory framework of banks
Regulatory framework of banksRegulatory framework of banks
Regulatory framework of banks
 
Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109
Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109
Guide to First Time Adoption of Ind AS 109
 
Income Tax.pdf
Income Tax.pdfIncome Tax.pdf
Income Tax.pdf
 
Herstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt Bank
Herstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt BankHerstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt Bank
Herstatt settlement risk & the collapse of herstatt Bank
 
IAS-1: Presentation of Financial Statements
IAS-1: Presentation of Financial StatementsIAS-1: Presentation of Financial Statements
IAS-1: Presentation of Financial Statements
 
ARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instruments
ARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instrumentsARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instruments
ARM FD solutions - IFRS 9 financial instruments
 
Ias 8
Ias 8Ias 8
Ias 8
 
Portfolio management
Portfolio managementPortfolio management
Portfolio management
 
Ifrs 9
Ifrs 9Ifrs 9
Ifrs 9
 
Asset Liability Management
Asset Liability ManagementAsset Liability Management
Asset Liability Management
 
IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)
IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)
IFRS - An Introduction (Including Ind-AS)
 
Accrual ipsas
Accrual ipsasAccrual ipsas
Accrual ipsas
 
Ind as 7
Ind as 7Ind as 7
Ind as 7
 

Viewers also liked

IM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamwork
IM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamworkIM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamwork
IM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamworkTriFinance Nederland
 
Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015
Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015
Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015
Adrian Poole
 
CRD IV and EBA reporting
CRD IV and EBA reportingCRD IV and EBA reporting
CRD IV and EBA reporting
Philippe Meyer
 
AIFMD and MiFID II
AIFMD and MiFID IIAIFMD and MiFID II
AIFMD and MiFID II
Bovill
 
The impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading business
The impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading businessThe impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading business
The impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading business
Tom White
 
MiFID II: the next step presentation
MiFID II: the next step presentationMiFID II: the next step presentation
MiFID II: the next step presentation
Bovill
 
EXTENT-2016: MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocks
EXTENT-2016:  MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocksEXTENT-2016:  MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocks
EXTENT-2016: MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocks
Iosif Itkin
 
3 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 2017
3 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 20173 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 2017
3 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 2017
Drift
 
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheHow to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
Leslie Samuel
 

Viewers also liked (9)

IM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamwork
IM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamworkIM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamwork
IM meeting 3 maart 2014: Strong individuals, Great teamwork
 
Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015
Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015
Grant Thornton's Financial Services Regulatory Handbook 2014 2015
 
CRD IV and EBA reporting
CRD IV and EBA reportingCRD IV and EBA reporting
CRD IV and EBA reporting
 
AIFMD and MiFID II
AIFMD and MiFID IIAIFMD and MiFID II
AIFMD and MiFID II
 
The impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading business
The impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading businessThe impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading business
The impact of MiFID II on your OTC derivatives trading business
 
MiFID II: the next step presentation
MiFID II: the next step presentationMiFID II: the next step presentation
MiFID II: the next step presentation
 
EXTENT-2016: MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocks
EXTENT-2016:  MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocksEXTENT-2016:  MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocks
EXTENT-2016: MiFID 2 Requirements for testing and business clocks
 
3 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 2017
3 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 20173 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 2017
3 Things Every Sales Team Needs to Be Thinking About in 2017
 
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheHow to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
 

Similar to finrep-regulatory-reporting-of-financial-information

AABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.ppt
AABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.pptAABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.ppt
AABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.ppt
GereTassewN
 
ETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.ppt
ETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.pptETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.ppt
ETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.ppt
TemtimeDebere
 
ifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gashe
ifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gasheifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gashe
ifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gashe
Mohammedseid Ahmedin
 
Streamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
Streamlining Financial Statement DisclosuresStreamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
Streamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
MHM (Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.)
 
20190523 sftr exec overview
20190523 sftr exec overview20190523 sftr exec overview
20190523 sftr exec overview
Silvano Stagni
 
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon Blondal
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon BlondalOECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon Blondal
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon Blondal
OECD Governance
 
Roadmap to ifrs
Roadmap to ifrsRoadmap to ifrs
Roadmap to ifrs
Peculiar Labstery
 
CH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - Teaser
CH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - TeaserCH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - Teaser
CH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - Teaser
Stephanie Baruk
 
2014 Audit & Accounting Update
2014 Audit & Accounting Update2014 Audit & Accounting Update
2014 Audit & Accounting Update
Insero & Co. CPAs, LLP
 
Professional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in Pennsylvania
Professional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in PennsylvaniaProfessional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in Pennsylvania
Professional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in Pennsylvania
MikeColgan
 
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HMLIFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
HML Ltd
 
PwC CECL Overview Placemat_Final
PwC CECL Overview Placemat_FinalPwC CECL Overview Placemat_Final
PwC CECL Overview Placemat_FinalBen Havird
 
Utilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRS
Utilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRSUtilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRS
Utilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRS
Alithya
 
Mutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk Management
Mutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk ManagementMutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk Management
Mutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk Management
NICSA
 
Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015
Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015 Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015
Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015
GECKO Governance
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach It
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach ItIFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach It
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach It
JAMES OKARIMIA
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach itIFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
JAMES OKARIMIA
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should approach it
IFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should approach itIFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should approach it
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should approach it
JAMES OKARIMIA
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach itIFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
JAMES OKARIMIA
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.
JAMES OKARIMIA
 

Similar to finrep-regulatory-reporting-of-financial-information (20)

AABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.ppt
AABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.pptAABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.ppt
AABE-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe.ppt
 
ETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.ppt
ETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.pptETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.ppt
ETHopia-IFRS-Adoption-Road-Map-Presentation-to-Development-Bank_Gashe - Copy.ppt
 
ifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gashe
ifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gasheifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gashe
ifrs-adoption-road-map-presentation-to-development-bank gashe
 
Streamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
Streamlining Financial Statement DisclosuresStreamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
Streamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
 
20190523 sftr exec overview
20190523 sftr exec overview20190523 sftr exec overview
20190523 sftr exec overview
 
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon Blondal
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon BlondalOECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon Blondal
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Brian Quinn and Jon Blondal
 
Roadmap to ifrs
Roadmap to ifrsRoadmap to ifrs
Roadmap to ifrs
 
CH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - Teaser
CH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - TeaserCH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - Teaser
CH&Cie - EBA Assessment Methodology for IRB approach - Teaser
 
2014 Audit & Accounting Update
2014 Audit & Accounting Update2014 Audit & Accounting Update
2014 Audit & Accounting Update
 
Professional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in Pennsylvania
Professional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in PennsylvaniaProfessional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in Pennsylvania
Professional Issues Affecting the CPA Profession Nationally and in Pennsylvania
 
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HMLIFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
IFRS9 white paper - Credit Today and HML
 
PwC CECL Overview Placemat_Final
PwC CECL Overview Placemat_FinalPwC CECL Overview Placemat_Final
PwC CECL Overview Placemat_Final
 
Utilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRS
Utilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRSUtilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRS
Utilizing HFM to Handle the Requirements of IFRS
 
Mutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk Management
Mutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk ManagementMutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk Management
Mutual Fund Modernization and Liquidity Risk Management
 
Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015
Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015 Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015
Fund Regulation - Global Perspectives' Key Updates for 2015
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach It
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach ItIFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach It
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach It
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach itIFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should approach it
IFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should approach itIFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should approach it
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should approach it
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach itIFRS  Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it
 
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.
IFRS Implementation and How the Banks should Approach it.
 

finrep-regulatory-reporting-of-financial-information

  • 1. FINREP Regulatory reporting of financial information How ready are you? www.pwc.com May 2012
  • 2. Background Objectives Key objectives of FINREP: • Standardise European reporting requirements to reduce the impact on firms of multiple regular reporting requirements from different European supervisors; • Establish a central repository for European banking data, enabling improved risk identification and management for cross-border institutions; • Facilitate peer reviews, trend predictions, risk analysis and provide greater transparency, especially on cross-border firms; and • Enable data to be easily shared with national and international authorities, supervisory colleges, ESRB and ESAs. The Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) under The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV contains a mandate for the European Banking Authority (EBA) to develop Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) related to supervisory reporting requirements. In response, the EBA has developed two frameworks that will apply across Europe: Financial Reporting Standard (FINREP) – reporting of financial information to the regulator. Common Reporting Standard (COREP) – reporting of risk (Basel III) in 5 components (capital, solvency, credit risk, operational risk and market risk). To whom does it apply? FINREP applies to credit institutions reporting on a consolidated basis. A credit institution as defined by CRR Article four: An undertaking whose business is able to receive deposits or other repayable funds from the public and to grant credits for its own account. 1 2
  • 3. What are the impacts? Though the standard is not final, the draft has a proposed effective date of 1 January 2013 with the first reported period being the quarter ending 31 March 2013. The requirements are a significant increase from current financial reporting requirements (i.e. those set out in UK FSA 001 and FSA 002) by local regulators and includes expanded scope both in the number of templates for submission and the level of detail required: • Increase to over 40 new forms/templates with over 3,500 data fields. • Submissions are due within 42 calendar days of quarter end; a calendar quarter end is required. • In addition to quarterly reporting, re-submission of audited figures is required (no new audit requirements, however data must be submitted within 42 days and where a regulatory audit of the entity already occurs, the data must be resubmitted once the audit is complete). FINREP does not change the underlying accounting framework (there are templates for both IFRS reporters and local GAAP reporters). However, the FINREP consultation paper requires reporting of financial data on the entity consolidated using the CRR scope of consolidation, which differs from the scope of consolidation under the accounting frameworks. Additionally, in certain cases FINREP requires information that is not required by GAAP or that is disaggregated in a manner that differs from GAAP. For example: • Disaggregation by country of counterparty for assets and by location of activity for the income statement. • Reporting of change in fair value due to credit risk for assets in the held for trading category by asset type/counterparty type. • Reporting of certain economic hedges. • Consideration of tactical vs. strategic solutions – can FINREP be incorporated into existing strategic change programs or will there need to be workarounds? Other key considerations include: • Which entities are in scope? Is data available for the entity reported under consolidated supervision? • Does the current financial reporting process operate at a frequency and within a time period (within 42 days of quarter end) that would meet the requirements? Is the quality of the data (including the quarterly data) robust and well controlled? • Regulators’ increased focus on the quality of reporting data will result in changes to the format and frequency of the reports, and increased demand for greater assurance that the reports are accurate. FINREP will expose the quality of pre-audited figures to the regulator as it requires submission of initial figures and resubmission of audited figures. • The proposed implementation timeframe is challenging and may coincide with other projects; institutions should begin to understand the requirements; assess data gaps and review the current reporting process. The reporting required is also in excess of interim disclosure requirements. The FINREP requirements have three key impacts on the financial reporting function and institutions will need to: • Understand the new FINREP policy and requirements. • Identify and source the correct data to satisfy the FINREP requirements. • Develop an efficient and effective process to deliver FINREP reporting. FINREF policy & requirements Data Process Revised drafts of the CRR indicate the final proposal may only apply to IFRS reporters. Additionally, it is unclear whether FINREP will be mandated by the EBA or left to the discretion of the national regulators.
  • 4. FINREP – Timeline Proposed timelines of legislation and implementation Timing may change due to changes in the final version of CRD IV, the CRR and the ITS Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q2Q1 2013 What changes under FINREP? New data requirements New reports and templates More granular data New reporting language Short timeframe to comply Increased frequency of reporting Implementation of FINREP will be a major challenge for UK and EU banks and requires: 20-Dec-2011 EBA Consultation Paper CP50 issued 20-Mar-2012 End of consultation period 01-Jan-13 Institutional compliance 20-Feb-2012 Public hearing on CP50 20-Jun-12 Final draft of Implementing Technical Standards 31-Mar-13 1st Regulatory reporting period end 13-May-13 Submission to national authorities
  • 5. Example of how PwC has helped a client to gain a clear understanding in four weeks Client issue The client needed to determine how best to address new financial reporting requirements to regulators (FINREP) as drafted by the European Banking Authority (EBA). As the client already reports extensive data to the regulators, PwC was requested to determine the feasibility of leveraging current regulatory reporting to meet the FINREP requirements. The client faced short deadlines and required support with expertise and resources. PwC approach PwC designed an approach to analyse and interpret the FINREP requirements and to determine the extent of overlap with current regulatory reporting. Findings were summarised and recommendations were developed into options for senior management. PwC also provided in depth analysis on the FINREP policy and the approach to sourcing the required data. Furthermore, PwC supported the client in understanding implications for the current reporting process and considerations for tactical solutions in order to comply with FINREP by 1 January 2013. Client benefit PwC helped the client to gain a clear understanding of the FINREP policy, the granular data requirements and the significant impact on the current financial reporting processes. The engagement enabled the client to take an informed decision on how to comply with the FINREP requirements within the timeframe set out by the regulators.
  • 6. This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers does not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. © 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. “PricewaterhouseCoopers” and “PwC” refer to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwCIL). Each member firm is a separate legal entity and does not act as agent of PwCIL or any other member firm. PwCIL does not provide any services to clients. PwCIL is not responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of any of its member firms nor can it control the exercise of their professional judgement or bind them in any way. No member firm is responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of any other member firm nor can it control the exercise of another member firm’s professional judgement or bind another member firm or PwCIL in any way. 120724-142213-LM-OS www.pwc.com How can PwC help? Just getting started In progress Progressed implementation • Rapid commencement of impact analysis to identify how FINREP will impact current financial reporting requirements, systems, processes, and governance. • Assist with stakeholder communication and training on FINREP and its impact. • Quickly develop a project and resource plan to address FINREP requirements in the necessary time frames. • Comprehensive review of your current project plan to assess coverage of high impact areas including data, systems, operating model, governance, and change management. • Review business requirements against the latest FINREP guidance. • Review/Design of governance structure to support FINREP needs. • Review/Design of appropriate systems controls. Plan and mobilise to address FINREP requirements Assess your current plan and progress and identify any necessary course correction Assess readiness to go-live on FINREP processes and systems • Review and assistance with a comprehensive testing strategy. • Independent assessment of readiness of FINREP solutions across systems, process, and governance. • Identify opportunities to leverage FINREP solutions into other finance reporting processes, including management information. Where are you with FINREP? How can PwC help? UK Germany Contacts Mark Batten Partner Finance Consulting +44 (0) 20 7804 3169 mark.e.batten@uk.pwc.com Parrish Pryce-Williams Senior Manager Finance Consulting +44 (0) 189 552 2555 parrish.pryce-williams@uk.pwc.com Eddie Hodgeon Partner CMAS – Accounting Advisory +44 (0) 20 72 313 1577 edmund.hodgeon@uk.pwc.com Kristy Witkowski Senior Manager CMAS – Accounting Advisory +44(0) 20 7804 7975 kristen.y.witkowski@uk.pwc.com Ullrich Hartmann Partner Assurance +49 699 585 2115 ullrich.hartmann@de.pwc.com Friedemann Loch Director Assurance +49 699 585 5228 friedemann.loch@de.pwc.com