This document provides an overview of the IoT protocol stack, with a focus on IEEE 802.15.4 and RPL. It describes the 7-layer IoT World Forum reference model and the layers' functions. It then discusses the IEEE 802.15.4 standard for low-rate wireless personal area networks, including its physical layer specifications, MAC layer features, and supported network topologies. Finally, it explains the RPL routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks, covering its directed acyclic graph structure, control messages, objective functions, and self-healing capabilities.
Describes the key protocols used in Internet of Things across the network stack.
It covers the MAC protocol such as 802.15.4, Zigbee, Z-wave, Bluetooth, BLE, some key protocol used in IIoT - Industrial Internet of Things / Automation such as ISA 100.11, Wireless HART, NB-IoT, LTE-M
Effort has been made to keep the explanation short and crisp. The intention was never to replace numerous books on this subject.
The IEEE 802 is a family of IEEE standards dealing with Local Area Networks and Metropolitan Area Networks. The IEEE 802 family of standards is maintained by the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC).
The most widely used standards are for the Bridging and Virtual Bridged LANs (802.1), Ethernet family (802.3), Token Ring (802.5) and Wireless LAN (802.11).
Group A - IEEE_802.15.4
Apil, Irish A.
Cenal, Marie Claire B.
Cruz, Joshua Franzel
Esguerra, Jomarie Paolo L.
Estavillo, Edlyn U.
Jacoben, Joanne Marie G.
Lucas, Ralph Jayson
Describes the key protocols used in Internet of Things across the network stack.
It covers the MAC protocol such as 802.15.4, Zigbee, Z-wave, Bluetooth, BLE, some key protocol used in IIoT - Industrial Internet of Things / Automation such as ISA 100.11, Wireless HART, NB-IoT, LTE-M
Effort has been made to keep the explanation short and crisp. The intention was never to replace numerous books on this subject.
The IEEE 802 is a family of IEEE standards dealing with Local Area Networks and Metropolitan Area Networks. The IEEE 802 family of standards is maintained by the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC).
The most widely used standards are for the Bridging and Virtual Bridged LANs (802.1), Ethernet family (802.3), Token Ring (802.5) and Wireless LAN (802.11).
Group A - IEEE_802.15.4
Apil, Irish A.
Cenal, Marie Claire B.
Cruz, Joshua Franzel
Esguerra, Jomarie Paolo L.
Estavillo, Edlyn U.
Jacoben, Joanne Marie G.
Lucas, Ralph Jayson
A session in the DevNet Zone at Cisco Live, Berlin. Flare allows users with mobile devices to discover and interact with things in an environment. It combines multiple location technologies, such as iBeacon and CMX, with a realtime communications architecture to enable new kinds of user interactions. This session will introduce the Flare REST and Socket.IO API, server, client libraries and sample code, and introduce you to the resources available on DevNet and GitHub. Come visit us in the DevNet zone for a hands-on demonstration.
Introduction to IoT
Defining IoT,
Characteristics of IoT,
Physical design of IoT,
Logical design of IoT,
Functional blocks of IoT,
Brief review of applications of IoT.
Smart Object
Definition,
Characteristics and Trends
Text Book
1. Arsheep Bahga (Author), Vijay Madisetti, Internet Of Things: A Hands-On Approach
Paperback, Universities Press,
Reprint 2020
2. David Hanes, Gonzalo Salgueiro, Patrick Grossetete, Robert Barton, Jerome Henry,
IoT Fundamentals Networking Technologies, Protocols, and Use Cases for the Internet of
Things CISCO.
Internet of Things.
CSDLO5013
The Differences Between Bluetooth, ZigBee and WiFiMostafa Ali
Understanding Differences Between Bluetooth, ZigBee and WiFi.
It's not about what is the best it's just a description, the best you have to choose for your project what is suitable more?
IEEE 802.15.4 is a wireless communication standard that was specifically desi...TohidKhan29
IEEE 802.15.4 is a wireless communication standard that was specifically designed for low-rate, short-range wireless communication among devices. It is part of the IEEE 802 family of standards, which encompasses various wireless and wired networking standards. IEEE 802.15.4 focuses on providing a cost-effective and energy-efficient solution for connecting devices in applications where low data rates and low power consumption are essential
A session in the DevNet Zone at Cisco Live, Berlin. Flare allows users with mobile devices to discover and interact with things in an environment. It combines multiple location technologies, such as iBeacon and CMX, with a realtime communications architecture to enable new kinds of user interactions. This session will introduce the Flare REST and Socket.IO API, server, client libraries and sample code, and introduce you to the resources available on DevNet and GitHub. Come visit us in the DevNet zone for a hands-on demonstration.
Introduction to IoT
Defining IoT,
Characteristics of IoT,
Physical design of IoT,
Logical design of IoT,
Functional blocks of IoT,
Brief review of applications of IoT.
Smart Object
Definition,
Characteristics and Trends
Text Book
1. Arsheep Bahga (Author), Vijay Madisetti, Internet Of Things: A Hands-On Approach
Paperback, Universities Press,
Reprint 2020
2. David Hanes, Gonzalo Salgueiro, Patrick Grossetete, Robert Barton, Jerome Henry,
IoT Fundamentals Networking Technologies, Protocols, and Use Cases for the Internet of
Things CISCO.
Internet of Things.
CSDLO5013
The Differences Between Bluetooth, ZigBee and WiFiMostafa Ali
Understanding Differences Between Bluetooth, ZigBee and WiFi.
It's not about what is the best it's just a description, the best you have to choose for your project what is suitable more?
IEEE 802.15.4 is a wireless communication standard that was specifically desi...TohidKhan29
IEEE 802.15.4 is a wireless communication standard that was specifically designed for low-rate, short-range wireless communication among devices. It is part of the IEEE 802 family of standards, which encompasses various wireless and wired networking standards. IEEE 802.15.4 focuses on providing a cost-effective and energy-efficient solution for connecting devices in applications where low data rates and low power consumption are essential
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2. Outline of Presentation
• IoT World Forum Architecture
• IoT Protocol Stack Architecture
• Communication Models
• Communication API
• IoT levels and Deployment Templates
3. 3
IoT World Forum (IoTWF)
Standardized Architecture
• IoTWF architectural committee published 7-
layer IoT architectural reference model in 2014
• This committee was led by Cisco, IBM,
Rockwell Automation, and others
• While various IoT reference models exist, the
one put forth by the IoT World Forum offers
clean, simplified perspective on IoT
• Includes edge computing, data storage, and
access
5. 7
Layer 1: Physical Devices and
Controllers Layer
• This layer is home to the “things” in the IoT,
including various endpoint devices & sensors
• Size of these “things” can range from almost
tiny sensors to huge machines in factory
• Their primary function is generating data and
being capable of being controlled over
network
11. 1
3
IEEE802.15.4
• Provides framework for lower layers (MACand
PHY)for wirelessP
AN
• PHYdefines frequency band, transmission
power, and modulation schemeof thelink
• MACdefines issuessuchasmedium access
and flow control (frames)
• Usedfor low power, low cost and lowspeed
communication between devices (<~75m)
12. 1
4
Features of IEEE802.15.4
• Nature of transmission is line ofsight
• Standard range of transmission - 10 to75m
• Transmission of data usesCSMA-CA(carrier
sensemultiple accesswith collision avoidance)
• Star and peer-to-peer network topologyis
included
13. 1
5
IEEE802.15.4
Version Feature
802.15.4-
2003
Basicversion. Themodulation schemesand data rates were
fixed for different frequency band – 868, 915 MHz, and2.4
GHz.
802.15.4 -
2006
Also known as802.15.4b. Provides higher data rate even on the
lower frequency bands. In the 868 MHz, the data transmission
rate is up to 100 kb/s while in 915 MHz, the data transmission
rate is up to 250 kb/s. UsesOQPSKfor all the frequencybands.
802.15.4 a Increasesrange capability. Definestwo new physical layers–
Direct Sequenceultra-wideband (UWB)– 249.6 - 749.6 MHz
(sub-gigahertz band), 3.1 - 4.8 GHz(low band), and 6 - 10 GHz
(high band). Chirp spreadspectrum (CSS)approach in ISMband
at 2.4GHz.
802.15.4 c Thisversion provides 780 MHzband in China. It useseither
O-QPSKor MPSK(Multiple frequency-shift keying)using
data transmission rate 250kb/s.
14. 1
6
IEEE802.15.4
Version Feature
802.15.4 d Thisversion provides 950 MHzband in Japan.It useseither
GFSK(Gaussianfrequency-shift keying) using data rate 100
kb/s or BPSKusing data rate 20kb/s.
802.15.4e Defines MACdevelopments to IEEE802.15.4 towardsISA
SP100.11aapplication (industrial applications).
802.15.4f Defines fresh PHYsfor 433 MHz frequency band(RFID
applications), 2.4 GHzfrequency band andUWB.
802.15.4g Defines fresh PHYsfor smart utility networks for902 - 928
MHz band (smart grid applications, majorly for theenergy
industry).
16. 802.15.4
• IEEE 802.15.4 task group began to developa
standard for LR-WPAN.
• The goal of this group was to provide a
standard with ultra-low complexity, cost, and
power for low-data-rate wirelessconnectivity
among inexpensive fixed,portable, and
moving devices.
18. Approaches for Low Power
In order to achieve the low power and low cost goals
established by IEEE 802.15.4 the following approaches
are taken
• Reduce the amount of data transmitted
• Reduce the transceiver duty cycle and frequency of
data transmissions
• Reduce the frame overhead
• Reduce complexity
• Reduce range
• Implement strict power managementmechanisms
(power-down and sleep
19. IEEE 802.15.4
• IEEE 802.15.4 deals with only PHY layerand
portion of Data linklayer.
• The higher-layer protocols are left toindustry
and the individualapplications.
• The Zigbee Alliance is an association of
companies involved with building higher-layer
standards based on IEEE 802.15.4. This
includes network, security, and application
protocols.
20. IEEE 802.15.4
IEEE 802.15.4 draft standard supports multiple
network topologies including star and peer to peer
topology.
22. IEEE 802.15.4
• IEEE 802 splits DLL into MAC and LLC sublayers.
• LLC is standardized and is common in
802.3,802.11,802.15.1.
• Features of the IEEE 802.15.4 MAC are
– Association and disassociation
– acknowledged frame delivery
– Channel access mechanism
– Frame validation
– Guaranteed time slot management
– Beacon management.
23. IEEE 802.15.4 …MAC
• MAC provides data and management services
to upper layers
• 802.15.4 MAC is of very low complexity,
making it very suitable for its intended low-
end applications, albeit at the cost of a smaller
feature set than 802.15.1 (e.g., 802.15.4 does
not support synchronous voice links).
25. IEEE 802.15.4 …MAC
• Frame control field indicates the type of MAC
frame being transmitted, specifies the format of
the address field, and controls the
acknowledgment.
• Multiple address types : 64 bit physical address
and short 8 bit network assigned address are
provided.
• Address field size may vary from 0 to 20 bytes.
• Payload field is variable with condition size of
mac frame <= 127 bytes.
• FCS is used for integrity check using 16 bit CRC.
26. IEEE 802.15.4 …PHY
• This standard provides 2 PHY options with
frequency band as fundamental difference.
• 2.4 GHz band has worldwide availability and
provides a transmission rate of 250 kb/s.
• The 868/915 MHz PHY specifies operation in the
868 MHz band in Europe and 915 MHz ISM band
in the United States and offer data rates 20 kb/s
and 40 kb/s respectively.
• Different transmission rates can be exploited to
achieve a variety of different goals.
29. Parameter EtherNet WiFi WiMax LR-
WPAN(ZigBee)
Cellular
Used Inside
offices and
houses
Outside
offices and
houses
Outside
offices and
houses
Outside
offices and
houses
Outside
offices and
houses
IEEE
Standards:
802.3 802.11 802.16 802.15.4
Range 100mtrs 100 mrts 80-90kms 10-100 mtrs 1-5kms
Data
Transfer
Rate
10Mb
ps-
100M
bps
54Mbps 40Mbps 250kbit/s 100Kb
ps-
1MB
ps
Application Houses,
Offices,
Industries
Mobile
Applications
, Video
Conferenci
ng
MetroPolita
n Area
Network
Smart
Metering,
Home
Automation
(Alexa), Smart
Asset Tracking
Camera on
Traffic
Light,
Video on
Demand
30. Working of RPL [02][05][06][07]
• Follows distance-vector routing protocol based on IPv6
• Directed Acyclic Graph(DAG):No cycles
• Destination-Oriented DAG(DODAG):Single root
• Up: Towards root
• Down: Away from root
• Objective Function: Hop count, ETX(Expected Transmission Count)(OF0,MHROF)
• Rank : Distance from root using specified objective
• RPL Instance: One or more DODAGs.
A node may belong to multiple RPL instances.
• DODAG ID: IPv6 Adr. Of the root
• DODAG Version: Current version of DODAG.Every time a new DODAG is computed
with the same root,its version incremented(for global repair)
RPL concepts
32. Working of RPL
1. DODAG Information Object(DIO):
▫ Downward RPL instance multicasts
▫ Allows other nodes to discover an RPL instance and join it
2. DODAG Information Solicitation(DIS)
▫ Link-Local multicast request for DIO(neighbour discovery)
▫ Do you know of any DODAGs?
3. Destination Advertisement Object(DAO)
▫ From child to parents or root
▫ Can I join you as a child on DODAG #x?
4. DAO Ack:Yes,you can! Or Sorry,you cant!
5. Consistency Check: Challenge/response messages for security
RPL Control Messages
33. RPL Operation
0
1 1
3
2
2
2
1
DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO
DIO
2
3 3 3
3
2
• Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) Information Option (DIO) messages are
broadcast to build the tree; includes a node’s rank (its level), ETX, etc.
• ETX probe is sent periodically to probe neighboring ETX
35. Self Healing in RPL
• On a link failure a local repair mechanism tries to select a new parent or
path.
• If there are more local failures, RPL performs a complementary global
repair where the whole DODAG is rebuilt with different version number.
• The RPL protocol uses the link-layer metric as a parameter in the
calculation of a default route. The path is assumed to be good if link-layer
acknowledgements are received on it.
• RPL also uses a trickle timer to handle inconsistencies in the RPL
DODAG.
36. Summary of RPL [05]
Feature Description
Target Network LLN:IPv6/6LowPAN networks
Routing Type Source-routing,Distance-Vector
Topology Mesh,Hierarchical based on DAG
Traffic Flows MP2P,P2MP and P2P
Message update Trickle Timer
Control Messages DIO,DAO,DIS
Transmission Unicast and Multicast
Metrics and
Constraints
Dynamic, based on OF and Rank
Modes Storing and non-storing
37. RPL Implementation at various OS/Simulation Tools
Name OS Protocol Version Notes(Extensions…)
TinyRPL TinyOS Draft-ietf-roll-rpl-17 • Uses BLIP2.0
• Only Storing mode
• Only Single RPL instance ID
• Security options not supported
• Only telosb and epic platform
supported
ContikiRPL Contiki RFC 6550 By default enabled on Tmote sky platform
OpenWSN OpenWSN RFC 6550
NanoRK Nano-RK Draft-ietf-roll-rpl-07
NanoQplus NanoQplus Draft-ietf-roll-rpl-13
Operating System incorporating RPL [02]
Name Language Protocol Version Notes(Extensions…
)
Cooja C RFC 6550 MSPsim
NS-3 C++ and Python Draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19
Omnet++ C++ Draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19
J-SIM Tcl/Java Draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19 EU Funded Project
Simulators incorporating RPL [02]
38. IoT Protocols…Application
Layer…Hyper Text Transfer Protocol
• Forms foundation of World Wide Web(WWW)
• Includes commands such as GET,PUT, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS, TRACE..etc
• Follows a request-response model
• Uses Universal Resource Identifiers(URIs) to identify HTTP resources
39. IoT Protocols…Application Layer…CoAP
• Constrained Application Protocol
• Used for Machine to machine (M2M) applications meant for constrained
devices and n/w’s
• Web transfer protocol for IoT and uses request-response
model
• Uses client –server architecture
• Supports methods such as GET,POST, PUT and DELETE
• CoAP makes use of the UDP protocol for lightweight implementation.
• It also uses restful architecture, which is just like the HTTP protocol.
40.
41. IoT Protocols…Application Layer…WebSocket
• Allows full-duplex communication over single socket
• Based on TCP
• Client can be a browser, IoT device or mobile application
IoT Protocols…Application Layer…MQTT
• Message Queue Telemetry Transport , light-weight messaging protocol
• Based on publish-subscribe model
• Well suited for constrained environments where devices have limited processing, low
memory and n/w bandwith requirement
43. IoT Protocols…Application Layer…AMQP
• Advanced Messaging Queuing Protocol used for business messaging.
• Supports both point-to-point and publisher/subscriber models, routing
and queuing
• Broker here receives messages from publishers and route them over
connections to consumers through messaging queues.
44. IoT Protocols…Application Layer…XMPP
• Extensible messaging and presence protocol
• For Real time communication and streaming XML data between n/w
entities
• Used for Applications such as Multi-party chat and voice/video calls.
• Decentralized protocol and uses client server architecture.
45. IoT Protocols…Application Layer…DDS
• Data Distribution service is a data-centric middleware standard for
device-to-device or machine-to-machine communication.
• Publish subscribe model where publishers create topics to which
subscribers can use.
• Provides Quality-of-service control and configurable reliability.
46.
47. Parameter HTTP CoAP XMPP(Ope
n XML)
DDS AMQP MQTT
Protocol TCP UDP TCP TCP and
UDP
TCP TCP
Network
Layer
IP 6LowPAN IP IP IP IP
Architectu
re
Clie
nt-
Serv
er
Client-
Server and
Publish-
Subscribe
Client-
Server
Publish-
Subscribe
Client-
Server and
Publish-
Subscribe
Publish-
Subscribe
Synchroni
zation
Needed No Need Needed Sometimes
Needed,
Sometimes
Not
Needed Needed
Designed
for
Internet IoT/M2M IoT/M2M Real Time
SYstems
M2M IoT/M2M
Application WWW Retrieving
Sensor
Data
WhatsApp,
Gaming,
Google
Talk
Volswagen
Smart Cars
for Video
Assistance
Google
Cloud
Facebook
Messenger
60. Comparison Based on REST Websocket
State Stateless Stateful
Directional Unidirectional Bidirectional
Req-Res/Full Duplex Follow Request Response Model Exclusive Pair Model
TCP Connections Each HTTP request involves
setting up a new TCP
Connection
Involves a single TCP
Connection for all
requests
Header Overhead Each request carries HTTP Headers,
hence not suitable forreal-time
Does not involve overhead of
headers.
Scalability Both horizontal and vertical
are easier
Only Vertical is easier
Difference between REST and WebSocket-based
Communication APIs