Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) occur in approximately 250,000 patients annually in the United States, leading to increased mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stays. This paper reviews recommendations for CLABSI prevention in non-ICU settings, including continuing education, quality assurance programs, care bundles focusing on hand hygiene and chlorhexidine dressings, and removing lines when medically permitted. It also discusses ensuring applicability of research findings through evaluating previous studies and identifying gaps in knowledge regarding CLABSI prevention. The recommendations and prevention strategies discussed are applicable to multiple clinical settings to reduce infection rates.
Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs) are the fourth leading cause of death in the USA. About 1.8 million patients suffer annually from care-related infections. HAIs cause 99,000 deaths every year in the US alone, at a cost of $3.1 billion dollars in excess healthcare costs in acute care hospitals. Besides HAIs kill more people than AIDS, breast cancer and auto accidents combined.
It is estimated that 271 people died each day from healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Which is equivalent to one airline crash per day.
Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs) are the fourth leading cause of death in the USA. About 1.8 million patients suffer annually from care-related infections. HAIs cause 99,000 deaths every year in the US alone, at a cost of $3.1 billion dollars in excess healthcare costs in acute care hospitals. Besides HAIs kill more people than AIDS, breast cancer and auto accidents combined.
It is estimated that 271 people died each day from healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Which is equivalent to one airline crash per day.
Importance of infection control in ICU
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia definition and bundles, Central line-associated infection and its bundles and foley's catheter-associated infection and its bundles
this presentation in reference to CDC and IMO
A "bundle" is a
group of evidence-based care components
for a given disease that, when executed together, may result in better outcomes than if implemented individually.
Purpose of the call:
•Review current data and state of the SSCL
•Discuss the role of communications and team work in patient safety
•Discuss and define how we can measure the effectiveness of the SSCL.
Read more and watch the webinar recording: http://bit.ly/1sXDqaZ
1
Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal
Studentfirstname Studentlastname
College of Nursing, Resurrection University
NUR4440: Research in Nursing
Professor Carina Piccinini
February 14, 2020
2
Quantitative Appraisal and Synopsis
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and appraise a research study testing the use of
disinfectant caps on intravenous (IV lines) to reduce the rate of hospital associated bloodstream
infections (BSI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2019) reports that
central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) remain a major concern in hospital
settings causing fatalities, increased length of stay, and increased costs. The CDC (2019)
recommends proper maintenance of intravenous lines to reduce the risk of infection. Current
research is still looking to define what proper maintenance should be, including whether
disinfectant caps influence rates of infection for intravenous (IV) lines.
Summary of the Study
The CDC recommends that healthcare workers disinfect all needleless connectors for
peripheral and central IVs prior to connection to reduce the risk of CLABSIs without further
recommendation on the type or length of disinfections. The authors of this study note other
studies have tested disinfecting caps and sought to confirm those results.
Merrill et al. (2014) conducted a quasi-experimental study to identify if disinfectant caps
reduce CLABSI incidence and the relationship between nursing compliance with the caps and
CLABSI rates. This study was held in a single Trauma 1 hospital with 430 beds in the United
States.
The researchers obtained their sample through nonrandom convenience sampling by
including all patients meeting inclusion criteria at the hospital starting January 2012. Participants
were included if they had a central or peripheral intravenous line, of any age, and were admitted
to 13 specific hospital floors. Subjects were excluded if they were on the following floors:
emergency department; labor, delivery or post-partum; ambulatory care, surgical services; and
Commented [CP1]: This answers “Why is this important
to study?” It’s not just ensuring our patients do not get
CLABSIs…it goes beyond that to fatalities, length of stay in
hospitals, and healthcare costs.
The CDC and other healthcare related organizations are great
sources of information on the importance of topics.
Commented [CP2]: What is known (recommendation to
disinfect ports), not known (what specifically should be
used), and gap in knowledge (confirmation of other study
results).
This information is found in the introduction to every
research article. DO NOT use the discussion/conclusions
section of an article for this information! It will be
WRONG.
Commented [CP3]: Study being summarized/appraised is
correctly cited.
Specific research design stated.
Setting of study stated.
3
well-baby nursery. The study did ...
1 Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal StudentfAbbyWhyte974
1
Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal
Studentfirstname Studentlastname
College of Nursing, Resurrection University
NUR4440: Research in Nursing
Professor Carina Piccinini
February 14, 2020
2
Quantitative Appraisal and Synopsis
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and appraise a research study testing the use of
disinfectant caps on intravenous (IV lines) to reduce the rate of hospital associated bloodstream
infections (BSI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2019) reports that
central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) remain a major concern in hospital
settings causing fatalities, increased length of stay, and increased costs. The CDC (2019)
recommends proper maintenance of intravenous lines to reduce the risk of infection. Current
research is still looking to define what proper maintenance should be, including whether
disinfectant caps influence rates of infection for intravenous (IV) lines.
Summary of the Study
The CDC recommends that healthcare workers disinfect all needleless connectors for
peripheral and central IVs prior to connection to reduce the risk of CLABSIs without further
recommendation on the type or length of disinfections. The authors of this study note other
studies have tested disinfecting caps and sought to confirm those results.
Merrill et al. (2014) conducted a quasi-experimental study to identify if disinfectant caps
reduce CLABSI incidence and the relationship between nursing compliance with the caps and
CLABSI rates. This study was held in a single Trauma 1 hospital with 430 beds in the United
States.
The researchers obtained their sample through nonrandom convenience sampling by
including all patients meeting inclusion criteria at the hospital starting January 2012. Participants
were included if they had a central or peripheral intravenous line, of any age, and were admitted
to 13 specific hospital floors. Subjects were excluded if they were on the following floors:
emergency department; labor, delivery or post-partum; ambulatory care, surgical services; and
Commented [CP1]: This answers “Why is this important
to study?” It’s not just ensuring our patients do not get
CLABSIs…it goes beyond that to fatalities, length of stay in
hospitals, and healthcare costs.
The CDC and other healthcare related organizations are great
sources of information on the importance of topics.
Commented [CP2]: What is known (recommendation to
disinfect ports), not known (what specifically should be
used), and gap in knowledge (confirmation of other study
results).
This information is found in the introduction to every
research article. DO NOT use the discussion/conclusions
section of an article for this information! It will be
WRONG.
Commented [CP3]: Study being summarized/appraised is
correctly cited.
Specific research design stated.
Setting of study stated.
3
well-baby nursery. The study did ...
1
Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal
Studentfirstname Studentlastname, Studentfirstname Studentlastname, Studentfirstname
Studentlastname, Studentfirstname Studentlastname
College of Nursing, Resurrection University
NUR4440: Research in Nursing
Professor Carina Piccinini
February 14, 2020
2
Quantitative Appraisal and Synopsis
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and appraise a research study testing the use of
disinfectant caps on intravenous (IV lines) to reduce the rate of hospital associated bloodstream
infections (BSI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2019) reports that
central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) remain a major concern in hospital
settings causing fatalities, increased length of stay, and increased costs. The CDC (2019)
recommends proper maintenance of intravenous lines to reduce the risk of infection. Current
research is still looking to define what proper maintenance should be, including whether
disinfectant caps influence rates of infection for intravenous (IV) lines.
Summary of the Study
The CDC recommends that healthcare workers disinfect all needleless connectors for
peripheral and central IVs prior to connection to reduce the risk of CLABSIs without further
recommendation on the type or length of disinfections. The authors of this study note other
studies have tested disinfecting caps and sought to confirm those results.
Merrill et al. (2014) conducted a quasi-experimental study to identify if disinfectant caps
reduce CLABSI incidence and the relationship between nursing compliance with the caps and
CLABSI rates. This study was held in a single Trauma 1 hospital with 430 beds in the United
States.
The researchers obtained their sample through nonrandom convenience sampling by
including all patients meeting inclusion criteria at the hospital starting January 2012. Participants
were included if they had a central or peripheral intravenous line, of any age, and were admitted
to 13 specific hospital floors. Subjects were excluded if they were on the following floors:
emergency department; labor, delivery or post-partum; ambulatory care, surgical services; and
3
well-baby nursery. The study did not report any demographic information about participants, the
number of participants, or attrition or loss to follow up.
The intervention involved applying a Curos brand disinfectant cap to all ports on
peripheral lines, central lines, and IV tubing when not in use on patients. The nurses on the
involved units were trained on the use of the disinfectant caps with a 1:1 follow up by the
researchers. Nurses were then responsible for placing caps. The researchers intermittently
observing nurses for compliance to the intervention and reporting compliance to nursing
departments twice a week.
CLABSIs were defined as a positive blood culture drawn within 48 hours symptom onset,
and C ...
Importance of infection control in ICU
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia definition and bundles, Central line-associated infection and its bundles and foley's catheter-associated infection and its bundles
this presentation in reference to CDC and IMO
A "bundle" is a
group of evidence-based care components
for a given disease that, when executed together, may result in better outcomes than if implemented individually.
Purpose of the call:
•Review current data and state of the SSCL
•Discuss the role of communications and team work in patient safety
•Discuss and define how we can measure the effectiveness of the SSCL.
Read more and watch the webinar recording: http://bit.ly/1sXDqaZ
1
Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal
Studentfirstname Studentlastname
College of Nursing, Resurrection University
NUR4440: Research in Nursing
Professor Carina Piccinini
February 14, 2020
2
Quantitative Appraisal and Synopsis
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and appraise a research study testing the use of
disinfectant caps on intravenous (IV lines) to reduce the rate of hospital associated bloodstream
infections (BSI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2019) reports that
central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) remain a major concern in hospital
settings causing fatalities, increased length of stay, and increased costs. The CDC (2019)
recommends proper maintenance of intravenous lines to reduce the risk of infection. Current
research is still looking to define what proper maintenance should be, including whether
disinfectant caps influence rates of infection for intravenous (IV) lines.
Summary of the Study
The CDC recommends that healthcare workers disinfect all needleless connectors for
peripheral and central IVs prior to connection to reduce the risk of CLABSIs without further
recommendation on the type or length of disinfections. The authors of this study note other
studies have tested disinfecting caps and sought to confirm those results.
Merrill et al. (2014) conducted a quasi-experimental study to identify if disinfectant caps
reduce CLABSI incidence and the relationship between nursing compliance with the caps and
CLABSI rates. This study was held in a single Trauma 1 hospital with 430 beds in the United
States.
The researchers obtained their sample through nonrandom convenience sampling by
including all patients meeting inclusion criteria at the hospital starting January 2012. Participants
were included if they had a central or peripheral intravenous line, of any age, and were admitted
to 13 specific hospital floors. Subjects were excluded if they were on the following floors:
emergency department; labor, delivery or post-partum; ambulatory care, surgical services; and
Commented [CP1]: This answers “Why is this important
to study?” It’s not just ensuring our patients do not get
CLABSIs…it goes beyond that to fatalities, length of stay in
hospitals, and healthcare costs.
The CDC and other healthcare related organizations are great
sources of information on the importance of topics.
Commented [CP2]: What is known (recommendation to
disinfect ports), not known (what specifically should be
used), and gap in knowledge (confirmation of other study
results).
This information is found in the introduction to every
research article. DO NOT use the discussion/conclusions
section of an article for this information! It will be
WRONG.
Commented [CP3]: Study being summarized/appraised is
correctly cited.
Specific research design stated.
Setting of study stated.
3
well-baby nursery. The study did ...
1 Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal StudentfAbbyWhyte974
1
Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal
Studentfirstname Studentlastname
College of Nursing, Resurrection University
NUR4440: Research in Nursing
Professor Carina Piccinini
February 14, 2020
2
Quantitative Appraisal and Synopsis
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and appraise a research study testing the use of
disinfectant caps on intravenous (IV lines) to reduce the rate of hospital associated bloodstream
infections (BSI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2019) reports that
central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) remain a major concern in hospital
settings causing fatalities, increased length of stay, and increased costs. The CDC (2019)
recommends proper maintenance of intravenous lines to reduce the risk of infection. Current
research is still looking to define what proper maintenance should be, including whether
disinfectant caps influence rates of infection for intravenous (IV) lines.
Summary of the Study
The CDC recommends that healthcare workers disinfect all needleless connectors for
peripheral and central IVs prior to connection to reduce the risk of CLABSIs without further
recommendation on the type or length of disinfections. The authors of this study note other
studies have tested disinfecting caps and sought to confirm those results.
Merrill et al. (2014) conducted a quasi-experimental study to identify if disinfectant caps
reduce CLABSI incidence and the relationship between nursing compliance with the caps and
CLABSI rates. This study was held in a single Trauma 1 hospital with 430 beds in the United
States.
The researchers obtained their sample through nonrandom convenience sampling by
including all patients meeting inclusion criteria at the hospital starting January 2012. Participants
were included if they had a central or peripheral intravenous line, of any age, and were admitted
to 13 specific hospital floors. Subjects were excluded if they were on the following floors:
emergency department; labor, delivery or post-partum; ambulatory care, surgical services; and
Commented [CP1]: This answers “Why is this important
to study?” It’s not just ensuring our patients do not get
CLABSIs…it goes beyond that to fatalities, length of stay in
hospitals, and healthcare costs.
The CDC and other healthcare related organizations are great
sources of information on the importance of topics.
Commented [CP2]: What is known (recommendation to
disinfect ports), not known (what specifically should be
used), and gap in knowledge (confirmation of other study
results).
This information is found in the introduction to every
research article. DO NOT use the discussion/conclusions
section of an article for this information! It will be
WRONG.
Commented [CP3]: Study being summarized/appraised is
correctly cited.
Specific research design stated.
Setting of study stated.
3
well-baby nursery. The study did ...
1
Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal
Studentfirstname Studentlastname, Studentfirstname Studentlastname, Studentfirstname
Studentlastname, Studentfirstname Studentlastname
College of Nursing, Resurrection University
NUR4440: Research in Nursing
Professor Carina Piccinini
February 14, 2020
2
Quantitative Appraisal and Synopsis
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and appraise a research study testing the use of
disinfectant caps on intravenous (IV lines) to reduce the rate of hospital associated bloodstream
infections (BSI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2019) reports that
central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) remain a major concern in hospital
settings causing fatalities, increased length of stay, and increased costs. The CDC (2019)
recommends proper maintenance of intravenous lines to reduce the risk of infection. Current
research is still looking to define what proper maintenance should be, including whether
disinfectant caps influence rates of infection for intravenous (IV) lines.
Summary of the Study
The CDC recommends that healthcare workers disinfect all needleless connectors for
peripheral and central IVs prior to connection to reduce the risk of CLABSIs without further
recommendation on the type or length of disinfections. The authors of this study note other
studies have tested disinfecting caps and sought to confirm those results.
Merrill et al. (2014) conducted a quasi-experimental study to identify if disinfectant caps
reduce CLABSI incidence and the relationship between nursing compliance with the caps and
CLABSI rates. This study was held in a single Trauma 1 hospital with 430 beds in the United
States.
The researchers obtained their sample through nonrandom convenience sampling by
including all patients meeting inclusion criteria at the hospital starting January 2012. Participants
were included if they had a central or peripheral intravenous line, of any age, and were admitted
to 13 specific hospital floors. Subjects were excluded if they were on the following floors:
emergency department; labor, delivery or post-partum; ambulatory care, surgical services; and
3
well-baby nursery. The study did not report any demographic information about participants, the
number of participants, or attrition or loss to follow up.
The intervention involved applying a Curos brand disinfectant cap to all ports on
peripheral lines, central lines, and IV tubing when not in use on patients. The nurses on the
involved units were trained on the use of the disinfectant caps with a 1:1 follow up by the
researchers. Nurses were then responsible for placing caps. The researchers intermittently
observing nurses for compliance to the intervention and reporting compliance to nursing
departments twice a week.
CLABSIs were defined as a positive blood culture drawn within 48 hours symptom onset,
and C ...
1
Quantitative Synopsis and Appraisal
Studentfirstname Studentlastname, Studentfirstname Studentlastname, Studentfirstname
Studentlastname, Studentfirstname Studentlastname
College of Nursing, Resurrection University
NUR4440: Research in Nursing
Professor Carina Piccinini
February 14, 2020
2
Quantitative Appraisal and Synopsis
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and appraise a research study testing the use of
disinfectant caps on intravenous (IV lines) to reduce the rate of hospital associated bloodstream
infections (BSI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2019) reports that
central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) remain a major concern in hospital
settings causing fatalities, increased length of stay, and increased costs. The CDC (2019)
recommends proper maintenance of intravenous lines to reduce the risk of infection. Current
research is still looking to define what proper maintenance should be, including whether
disinfectant caps influence rates of infection for intravenous (IV) lines.
Summary of the Study
The CDC recommends that healthcare workers disinfect all needleless connectors for
peripheral and central IVs prior to connection to reduce the risk of CLABSIs without further
recommendation on the type or length of disinfections. The authors of this study note other
studies have tested disinfecting caps and sought to confirm those results.
Merrill et al. (2014) conducted a quasi-experimental study to identify if disinfectant caps
reduce CLABSI incidence and the relationship between nursing compliance with the caps and
CLABSI rates. This study was held in a single Trauma 1 hospital with 430 beds in the United
States.
The researchers obtained their sample through nonrandom convenience sampling by
including all patients meeting inclusion criteria at the hospital starting January 2012. Participants
were included if they had a central or peripheral intravenous line, of any age, and were admitted
to 13 specific hospital floors. Subjects were excluded if they were on the following floors:
emergency department; labor, delivery or post-partum; ambulatory care, surgical services; and
3
well-baby nursery. The study did not report any demographic information about participants, the
number of participants, or attrition or loss to follow up.
The intervention involved applying a Curos brand disinfectant cap to all ports on
peripheral lines, central lines, and IV tubing when not in use on patients. The nurses on the
involved units were trained on the use of the disinfectant caps with a 1:1 follow up by the
researchers. Nurses were then responsible for placing caps. The researchers intermittently
observing nurses for compliance to the intervention and reporting compliance to nursing
departments twice a week.
CLABSIs were defined as a positive blood culture drawn within 48 hours symptom onset,
and C ...
REVIEW CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM2REVIEW CENTRAL .docxzmark3
REVIEW: CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM2
REVIEW
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM2
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections
Grand Canyon University
Translational Research and Evidence-Based Practice
DNP-820-O501
Running head: CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM 2
October 9, 2018
CLABSI Supporting Literature
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSIs) in a fatal infection that results from bacteria or viruses entering the bloodstream through the central line. A central line, also known as a central venous catheter (CVC), refers to a tube used by doctors to administer medication, fluids or to collect blood from the body of a patient (Deason & Gray, 2018). Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection is one of the leading causes of deaths each year in different countries across the globe. Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection has been an area of interest for many healthcare researchers representing a diverse body of knowledge about the infection while still expanding on what is already known. The paper is an analysis of articles related to CLABSIs with the major themes of concern to the authors including risk factors, interventions, CLABSIs and Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs), benefits of the preventive measures and the common symptoms of CLABSIs. There were 200 articles that were established to talk about the CVCs, CLABSIs, risk factors, intervention, and benefits of preventive measures. Through inclusion and exclusion criteria many journal articles were left out because of being written in other languages rather than English. Therefore, the use of the English language index the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) was used to search related journal articles. Other search tools includeThe National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) – PubMed. Studies older than five years were excluded to ensure that the research remained current and up to date. Using real-time cases or conditions helps to improve the quality and validity of the resulted research.
Questions Posed in the Studies
Afonso, Blot, & Blot (2016) seeks to establish how hospital-acquired bloodstream infections can be prevented through the use of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated washcloth bathing in intensive care units. In the study by Chidambaram (2015), the question raised is, what associations dental procedure and CVCs have.
Education, Simulated Training, Experience, and Knowledge
Kadium (2015) inquired into how the education program for one month, based on the evidence-based guidelines recommended by CDC, will improve registered dialysis nurses’ knowledge regarding CVC maintenance care? Other researchers that focus on how education, experience, and workshops enhance prevention or reduction of CVC infections include; El-Sol & Badawy, (2017), Leistner, Thürnagel, Schwab, Gastmeier, & Geffers (2013), and Soffle, Hayes, & Smith (2018). Dougherty (2014) questions the potential solutions in reducin.
THE 10 STRATEGIC POINTS FOR THE PROSPECTUS,21THE 10 STRATEGIC P.docxtodd801
THE 10 STRATEGIC POINTS FOR THE PROSPECTUS, 21
THE 10 STRATEGIC POINTS FOR THE PROSPECTUS, 28
DPI Project Milestone:10 Strategic Points for the Prospectus, Proposal, and Direct Practice Improvement Project
Running head: THE 10 STRATEGIC POINTS FOR THE PROSPECTUS, 1
The 10 Strategic Points for the Prospectus, Proposal, and Direct Practice Improvement Project
The 10 Strategic Points
Broad Topic Area
1. Broad Topic Area:
The topic taken into consideration is the Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) and prevention
Introduction
2. Introduction
· The paper is an analysis of the CLABSIs infection and how best the infection can be prevented or even eliminated among patients.
· The infection is characterized by a catheter gaining entry into the bloodstream, greatly affecting either the inferior or the superior vena cava or the vessels of the neck.
· The location of the catheter makes entry of pathogens into the bloodstream very occasional. Patients thus become sick easily.
· The risk factors associated with the infection can result from the healthcare provider and also the patients and include; contamination on insertion, the skin flora of the patient, non-intact dressing, poor nutrition, position of the central line, poor patient and healthcare provider hygiene.
· Symptoms include redness, swelling, discharge at the central line exit, fever, chills, respiratory distress, and altered cognitive state.
· The infection can be prevented, through monitoring of the patients for any signs and symptoms, ensuring proper hygiene practices, and keeping patients educated about management of their central line.
· The paper gives all these information in detail, why there is a need to address Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and how best the infection can be handled both by the health care givers and the patients.
Literature Review
3. Literature Review:
1. Primary points basis four sections in the Literature Review:
a. Background of the problem/gap:
· Researchers have dedicated numerous efforts towards the cause and the probable symptoms related to Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) that one needs to be on the look-out for.
· Attention has thus been shifted from the different measures to prevent the occurrence of the infection among patients.
· There arises an urgency to intervene and develop effective measures to curtail the incidence of CLABSIs.
· The use of proper hand hygiene and skin aseptic techniques over the insertion site is necessary for preventing microbial infections
· The nurses need to have the significant knowledge associated with evidence-based practices for the Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), their attitude towards the guidelines and the utilization of the hygienic measures for the Central Venous Catheter (CVC) patients.
b. Theoretical foundations (models and theories to be the foundation for the project)
· The efficacy of training of nu.
EVALUATION EMPIRICAL RESEARCH 2EVALUATION EMPIRICAL RESEARCH .docxturveycharlyn
EVALUATION: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH 2
EVALUATION: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH 7
Running head: EVALUATION: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH 1
Evaluation: Empirical Research
Introduction
The primary purpose of the research study has been to evaluate if, in adult patients with Central Venous Catheters (CVC), interventional staff education about hub hygiene provided to RN’s who access the CVC impact Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) rates compared to pre and post-intervention assessments over a two-month period. CLABSI rates will be compared to the Patient Safety Component from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network’s (NHSN) that includes identifying the causation and surveillance methods to track device-associated infections (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). In addressing the issue and providing the answer the to the research question, this researcher will examine the literature available on the stated topic. Some of the research articles on the subject show similarities regarding research approaches and themes and some have differences. The researcher also looked for evidence that suggests that the data supported the conclusion, and, in some studies, the findings answered the research question.
Evaluation of Research
Regarding similarity in the theme, the researcher did find some regularity in the articles by O’Neil et al. and Salma et al. In the research study, “A Central Line Care Maintenance Bundle for the Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Non-Intensive Care Unit Setting,” O’Neil et al. (2016) have suggested that there is a higher rate of compliance with optimal dressing care practices in the control group against the expectations. The primary theme of the research study has been the degree of hygiene maintained by nursing professionals in the context of caregiving in a central line care maintenance setting. In the research study a 12-month study was conducted by Caroline and associates to establish the effectiveness of a central line care maintenance bundle in the reduction of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSIs) in general medicine wards. They substantiated their research by disseminating educative guidelines and proper hands-on training for catheter insertion and care for nurses of the experimental group against those of a control group, along with asepsis (hygiene and evaluation of microbiological data). The trained nurses were instructed to examine the central line dressings twice a week for secureness or any purulent discharge. The results of the study revealed higher rates of compliance in optimal dressing care practices in the control group against the expectations. They exemplified a marginal reduction in the incidence of CLABSIs in the intervention group over the control group. The study lacks documentation of dating the dressing changes-a key factor in CLABSI prevention. Moreover, the research is restricted.
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docxsleeperharwell
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Literature Review
Kerry S. Murphy
Grand Canyon University
Translational Research and Evidence-Based Practice
DNP-820-O501
Dr. Kari Lane
September 26, 2018
Running head: CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Literature ReviewComment by Microsoft Office User: The heading of introduction is inferred in APA format
I. Introduction
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSIs) in a fatal infection that results from bacteria or viruses entering the bloodstream through the central line. A central line, also known as a central venous catheter, refers to a tube used by doctors to administer medication, fluids or to collect blood from the body of a patient (Deason & Gray, 2018). Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection is one of the leading causes of deaths each year in different countries across the globe. Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection has been an area of interest for many healthcare researchers representing a diverse body of knowledge about the infection while still expanding on what is already known. The paper is an analysis of articles related to CLABSIs with the major themes of concern to the authors including risk factors, interventions, CLABSIs and Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs), benefits of the preventive measures and the common symptoms of CLABSIs. Comment by Microsoft Office User: Add a description of how the literature search was completed. Tell the reader how you did your literature search, which databases you searched, how many articles were found, and how you eliminated articles to come to the ones you included here.
II. Questions Posed in the Studies
a. Afonso, Blot, & Blot (2016) seeks to establish how hospital-acquired bloodstream infections can be prevented through the use of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated washcloth bathing in intensive care units. In the study by Chidambaram (2015), the question raised is, what associations dental procedure and CVCs have.
b. Kadium, M. (2015) inquired into how the education program for 1 month, based on the
evidence-based guidelines recommended by CDC, will improve registered dialysis nurses’ knowledge regarding CVC maintenance care?
c. CDC and NCBI (2011) raise the research question, how many people have been affected in the USA from 2001-2009?
d. Srinivasan, Wise, Bell, Cardo,Edwards, Fridkin, Jernigan, Kallen, McDonald, & Patel (2011) considers questioning the perception of central line-associated bloodstream infection.
e. Dougherty (2012) questions the potential solutions in reducing incidences of central-line associated bloodstream infections have to be created in line with the clinical setting and careful consideration of the patients and the organizational culture.
f. Lin, Apisarnthanarak, Jaggi, Harrington, Morikane, Thu, Ching, Villanueva.
Confirmation of the Validity of the Central Line Bundle as a Measure of a Hea...Heather Gilmartin
Presentation at an evidence-based practice conference describing research that confirmed the central line bundle data as a measure of a healthcare intervention
Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (.docxstilliegeorgiana
Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs)
2
Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs)
Submitted by
Kerry Sean Murphy
DPI Project Proposal Chapter 3 - Methodology
Doctor of Nursing Practice
Grand Canyon University
Phoenix, Arizona
July 20, 2019
CHAPTER THREE: Methodology
Introduction
This project will be exploring the prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs). In this chapter, the discussion will focus on examining the variables that would help in preventing, controlling, and reducing the incidences of bloodstream infections. The methodology section will describe the objectives and describe the activities the project will entail to meet the objective of lowering infection rates. Further, the chapter will look into the methods of data collection and ways of analyzing the data as well as the ethical considerations the project will need to take into account.
Statement of the Problem
There is a need to have the CLABSI maintenance bundles due to cases of infection that have been recorded involves the adults that have been admitted to the intensive care units. According to Mishra et al., (2016), there are still several cases reported in India on such infections and in spite of the existence of guidelines for maintenance Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) continue to remain a problem. Clear Lake Regional Medical Center in Webster Texas reported a total of 18 hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in 2018. In 2019 in two quarters the facility has already reported 20 HAI ("SIR Report | HAI | CDC," 2019). There is a need to develop procedures and expand education that would improve and reduce the number of HAI like CLABSI. Comment by Kathryn Flynn: Please describe what this is to the non nurse before terminology is used. Comment by Kathryn Flynn: It would be a lot more credible for the justification to be in research from US. Comment by Kathryn Flynn: Use APA format (author, year)
Clinical Questions
The clinical questions are how to develop different ways in which the CLABSI can be minimized, specifically among patients greater than 65 years of age. Objectives of the project will look to answer the following questions
(i) What is the influence of the staff training on maintenance of a higher level of hygiene after insertion and cleanliness of insertion sites? Comment by Kathryn Flynn: This is subjective. Use evidence based, etc. and nte why it’s better than existing care.
(ii) How is consistency in the application of the evidence-based practices likely to impact infections rates after insertion using improved site maintenance? Comment by Kathryn Flynn: How will this be measured? Has this question been approved? Comment by Kathryn Flynn: Subjective. State what intervention you are implementing and use the same name for the intervention at every location in your writing. This will give the reader clarity.
(iii) How CLABSI maintenanc ...
8
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)
Walden University
Leadership Competencies in Nursing and Healthcare
NURS-4220-5
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)
The healthcare system must provide safe and quality care to all patients. For years, hospitals nationwide have struggled with healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Since HAIs are considered preventable events in a hospital setting the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) established reimbursement changes and hospitals are focusing more on patient safety practices and improving processes to have better patient outcomes (Thornlow & Merwin, 2009). According to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2017), approximately seventy-five percent of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections are associated with a urinary catheter with a prolonged use being the most critical risk factor for developing a CAUTI. Also, CAUTIs can cause an overabundance of complications included but not limited to gram-negative bacteremia, sepsis, and mortality (Skanlon, 2017). In a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH), prolonged and unnecessary use of indwelling urinary catheters is interrelated with a higher risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and extended lengths of stay (LOS) (Felix, 2016). The purpose of this paper is to reduce the usage of indwelling catheter days and decrease CAUTI rates from 2.48 to below the target rate of 1.71 by utilizing prevention practices in a 72-bed long-term acute care hospital emphasizing on the assurance of a continuous improvement process. This proposal consists of implementing alternatives before deciding to insert an indwelling catheter, utilizing maintenance bundles, and daily assessment of the necessity of the catheter. All these interventions are aiming at preventing and decreasing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).
The role of nurses in the prevention of CAUTIs is critical; we are the frontline of patient care and safety. Although, sometimes we encounter situations where a CAUTI occurs, the quality of care we provide to our patients reflects by the interventions we take to prevent our patients from getting an infection. Every action we make while providing care for a patient is an essential step in the quality of their care. Most patients admitted into long-term acute care have wounds or infections that require long-term antibiotics. These patients come in from acute care hospitals, and in the majority of the cases patients already have an indwelling urinary catheter, however, there are situations where the patient doesn’t come with an indwelling catheter, and nurses get orders to place one on admission. Finding alternatives to either discontinue or insert a foley is an essential part of the daily nursing assessment and on the hospitalization of these patients. Important factors to consider while assessing the patient are mobility, cognitive status, gender, and wounds.
L.
8
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)
Walden University
Leadership Competencies in Nursing and Healthcare
NURS-4220-5
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)
The healthcare system must provide safe and quality care to all patients. For years, hospitals nationwide have struggled with healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Since HAIs are considered preventable events in a hospital setting the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) established reimbursement changes and hospitals are focusing more on patient safety practices and improving processes to have better patient outcomes (Thornlow & Merwin, 2009). According to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2017), approximately seventy-five percent of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections are associated with a urinary catheter with a prolonged use being the most critical risk factor for developing a CAUTI. Also, CAUTIs can cause an overabundance of complications included but not limited to gram-negative bacteremia, sepsis, and mortality (Skanlon, 2017). In a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH), prolonged and unnecessary use of indwelling urinary catheters is interrelated with a higher risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and extended lengths of stay (LOS) (Felix, 2016). The purpose of this paper is to reduce the usage of indwelling catheter days and decrease CAUTI rates from 2.48 to below the target rate of 1.71 by utilizing prevention practices in a 72-bed long-term acute care hospital emphasizing on the assurance of a continuous improvement process. This proposal consists of implementing alternatives before deciding to insert an indwelling catheter, utilizing maintenance bundles, and daily assessment of the necessity of the catheter. All these interventions are aiming at preventing and decreasing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).
The role of nurses in the prevention of CAUTIs is critical; we are the frontline of patient care and safety. Although, sometimes we encounter situations where a CAUTI occurs, the quality of care we provide to our patients reflects by the interventions we take to prevent our patients from getting an infection. Every action we make while providing care for a patient is an essential step in the quality of their care. Most patients admitted into long-term acute care have wounds or infections that require long-term antibiotics. These patients come in from acute care hospitals, and in the majority of the cases patients already have an indwelling urinary catheter, however, there are situations where the patient doesn’t come with an indwelling catheter, and nurses get orders to place one on admission. Finding alternatives to either discontinue or insert a foley is an essential part of the daily nursing assessment and on the hospitalization of these patients. Important factors to consider while assessing the patient are mobility, cognitive status, gender, and wounds.
L ...
Enrolment of trial patients challenges & strategies
Final presentation research week 6[1]
1. Central Line Associated Blood
Stream Infection Prevention in
non-ICU Settings
Erica Badillo, Natalie Farquharson, DeAngel Jones, Heather Smith
NUR/518
March 3, 2014
Cindy Boyer
2. Central Line Blood Stream Infections
• 250,000 CLABSIs occur annually
• Lead to higher mortality and morbidity rates
• Increase lengths of stay
3. Recommendations for CLABSI prevention in
any setting
• Continuing education
• Quality Assurance
Intravenous tubing protocols
Sterile technique
4. Recommendations for CLABSI prevention in
any setting
• Nurse-Patient Ratios
• Care Bundles
Hand Hygiene
Chlorhexadine dressings
Catheter hub disinfection
Removal of lines when medically permitted
7. Conflict in research findings
• Gaps exists in the area of CLABSI’s in::
1. specificity of research
2. dedicated educational department
3. educational process
8. Confusion
• Confusion exists in the area of:
1.responsibility for central line maintenance
2. documentation of central line care
10. Applicability of Findings
• Professional nurses share an obligation to review current literature
• Allows for clarification of the problem
• Evidenced-based standardized care
• Prevention initiatives, protocols, guidelines
• Goal- to improve patient care and patient outcomes
11. Assessing Applicability of the Findings
• The interventions and prevention strategies are applicable to
multiple clinical settings
Findings were
consistent in
multiple studies
• It is expected that these interventions will be just as effective
at preventing infections in other settings
• A strong leadership team is vital to ensure staff compliance
• Many facilities have adapted a CLASBI prevention checklist.
Bundle interventions
have been shown to
significantly decrease
infection rates
12. Applying the research findings
Education
Support
Compliance
Procedure
carts
Hand hygiene
Aseptic
technique
Checklists
Guidelines IV team
Daily need
assessments
Avoid femoral
site
Chlorhexadine
Line
maintenance
Culture of
safety
Accountability
Quick removal
13. References:
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Central Line-Associated Bloodstream
Infection: Resource of Patients and Healthcare Providers. Retrieved February 2, 2014 from:
http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/bsi/CLABSI-resources.html
• Kallen, A., Patel, P., O’Grady, N. (2010). Preventing catheter-related bloodstream
infections outside the intensive care unit: expanding prevention to new settings. Clinical Infectious Diseases:
An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society; 51 (3), 335-41.
• Morrison, T. (2012). Qualitative analysis of central and midline care in the
medical/surgical setting. Clinical Nurse Specialist; 26(6):323-8. doi:10.1097/NUR.0b013e31826e3f2a
• The Joint Commission. (2010). Preventing Central Line-Associated Infections. A
Global Challenge, A Global Perspective. Retrieved from
http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/CLABSI_Monograph.pdf
According to the Joint Commission (2012), an estimated 80,000 CLABSIs occur in intensive care units every year in the United States. When including the amount of CLABSIs that occur outside of the intensive care unit the estimate increases to 250,000 CLABSIs annually (Joint Commission, 2012). CLABSIs are directly associated with increased patient mortality and morbidity, an increase in the length of stay, and excessive health care costs (Whited & Lowe, 2013). Although there has been much research in the intensive care unit (ICU) settings, there is little published on the recommendations for other settings in which central lines are utilized.
Continuing Education plays a major role in CLABSI prevention. According to Morrison (2012) one area identified as a barrier to prevention of CLABSIs in a non ICU setting is the lack of experience a nurse has related to caring for a central line. With education, nurses were able to have a better understanding of the key components to CLABSI prevention. By providing continuing education, nurses can remain abreast on current recommendations for how to care for central lines in turn decreasing CLABSIs. During the education in-services, are taught to inspect the site on a frequent basis to allow for identification and treatment of infections sooner.Quality assurance methods help decrease central line associated blood stream infections in any setting (The Joint Commission, 2010). Quality assurance methods implemented by hospitals and home care settings include changing IV lines that contain antibiotics every 72 hours and those containing routine fluids at 96 hours (Liang, 2012). This helps to decrease the amount of bacteria present in the IV tubing thus decreasing the risk of an infected central line. Another quality assurance method in decreasing CLABSIs is to ensure there is sterile technique when inserting the central line as well as when doing dressing changes (CDC, 2002).
Nurse to patient ratios were also identified as a barrier to providing the necessary central line care (Morrison, 2012). When nurses had higher patient ratios they were less likely to perform dressing changes as required. If the dressings were performed on time, nurses felt rushed and did not clean the insertion site as long as they should have, increasing the risk for infection. Care Bundles are a set of interventions implemented to decrease CLABSIs.Hand hygiene, aseptic technique, catheter type, inline filters, dressing regimens, antimicrobial impregnated catheters, catheter hub disinfection, catheter securement devices, and catheter removal as soon as possible also have proven to be useful in preventing central line infections (CDC, 2002). Hand hygiene is the most basic infection prevention method. The use of chlorhexadine dressings were also found to decrease central line infections (Kallen, Patel, and O’Grady, 2010). Prior to accessing central lines for blood draws, it is essential to “scrub the hub” for at least 15 seconds (Kallen, Patel, and O’Grady, 2010). This prevents any further introduction of bacteria into the bloodstream. Adherence to these recommendations leads to a decrease in central line infections which shows the effectiveness of following these recommendations. In addition to the implementation of these guidelines, medical professionals should always assess the need for a central line. The longer a central line is in place, the greater the risk for infection. The medical team should look at removing the central line as soon as medically possible.
Evaluates whether or not the research findings represent a reliable conceptual interpretation of the data drawn from the participant’s original data. The credibility was met by the truth value and verification by participants. Interview took place by phone and 45 minutes per interview. Transferability representation of the degree to which the findings of this inquiry can apply or transfer beyond the bounds of the project. Transferability was met by defining the participant sample, setting, and sample data. Dependability is an assessment of the quality of the process of data collection, data analysis, and theory generation. Dependability was met by utilizing digital recording to establish rigorous research trail documenting how the study was introduced to the participant and who conducted the interviews.
The validity of the study was measure by the interventions. In the study they recorded before and after interventions, the epidemiology and the clinical features of CLABSI. Data from prevalence studies were used to calculate a sample device utilization ratio (number of line days divided by the number of patient-days in the sample). Continuous variables were analyses using the t-test and categorical data were analyses using the chi-squared.
Gaps are present in the research of CLABSI”s because the literature is predominately based on CLABSI’s in intensive care units. CLABSI’s research is lacking in other areas such as outpatient, home care settings, post-surgical departments, and immunocompromised patients. There is a need for the creation of an educational department specifically for central line and CLABSI’s. This department could then focus on the education of nurses responsible for central line care in the area of the impact of CLABSI’s on patients including bleeding, pain, pneumothorax, and death. Another educational topic is the impact of CLABSI’s on facilities including increased cost, increased work-load on nurses, and decreased patient satisfaction.
Identification of a sole position designated to ensure central line dressing changes and central line administrations sets are changed according to central line protocols are still the primary responsibility of the bedside nurse. The confusion exits because at some facilities IV team nurses will perform the initial dressing change; while at other facilities the bedside nurse is responsible for all dressing changes. This confusion can be eliminated if there is a designated position created specifically for central line dressing changes and administration set changes. At present, there is no alert in computerized charting that prompts nurses when central line dressing changes and/or administrations sets are due to be changed. It is imperative that when these actions are completed that is documented in the patient’s recorded and it should also be communicated the next time these actions are due to be completed.
The research utilization process involved identification of the problem (CLASBI rates), an in-depth literature review of both qualitative and quantitative studies, and an evaluation of previous research studies to determine the applicability of findings to the clinical setting. There is a strong emphasis placed on research in nursing to improve patient care and patient outcomes. Professional nurses share an obligation to review current literature consistently to provide evidenced-based standardized care. Upon a review of the literature on CLABSI prevention, many of the research studies and reports are applicable to multiple clinical settings.
Hospitals and health care professionals across the world have recognized the seriousness of CLASBI and the need for prevention interventions to avoid harm and even death to the patient. Many health care organizations have begun to work towards CLASBI prevention, implementing bundle interventions and central-line protocols, particularly in the critical care setting. This allows for the development of evidenced-based standardized care through prevention initiatives, protocol, and guidelines. The common goal revolves around the patient, improving patient care to improve patient outcomes.
A key challenge for researchers is to determine if the research findings are applicable to the clinical setting and patient population. CLASBIs are a considerable clinical issue with 250,000 occurring annually in the United States, and more specifically 80,000 in intensive care units (The Joint Commission, 2010). While it is true that some patients are at a higher risk for infection then others, the CLASBI is not specific to one patient population over another. The significance of this clinical issue is widespread, not designed to critical patients but consistent with patients in various clinical settings. Research studies showed that bundle interventions, consisting of hand hygiene, daily needs assessment, frequent line inspections, and staff education will drastically reduce CLASBI rates. Studies have discussed the implementation of prevention toolkits, guidelines, checklists, and bundle protocols. State and federal initiatives have also focused on CLASBI prevention.Barriers to compliance and high infection rates have been identified as inadequate resources, staffing shortages, lack of leadership involvement and support, infection prevention policies, time management, focus of responsibility, patient population/unit, and variations in nursing clinical experience. Recommendations to decrease central line infections in non ICU settings include continuing education, quality assurance, and certified IV teams. A strong leadership team is needed to implement infection control policies as well as bundle interventions protocols, to ensure staff are educated, informed, to offer support, and handle barriers such as inadequate resources. The leadership team’s involvement is critical to success, providing teamwork, support, and showing commitment to a common goal which then focuses on a culture of safety throughout the health care organization. Preventing infection does require all staff members to work together, to hold each other accountable, and for staff to be empowered to make the necessary changes at the bedside. Health care administrators can empower staff, provide motivation, and then reward efforts when positive results are made. Support of the managers and leaders in dealing with this issue can be powerful.
Applying the research findings: EducationSupport from the leadership teamConsistent ComplianceProcedure cartsHand hygieneAseptic technique ChecklistsGuidelines and protocolsIV teamDaily needs assessmentsAvoid the femoral siteChlorhexadineLine maintenanceCulture of safetyAccountability Quick removal