Presentation to the Tech Coast Angels on key legal and regulatory considerations for biomedical (drug and device) start-up companies, given on March 7, 2003.
FDA Regulatory Considerations for Life Sciences CompaniesMichael Swit
April 2008 presentation to Swedish-American Chamber of Commerce Entrepreneurial Days on FDA issues for product development, including focus on:
Planning, approval process, barriers to entry
FDA Regulatory Considerations for the Biomedical Start-upMichael Swit
October 7, 2005 presentation to the LARTA CAP program in Newport Beach, CA, focusing on:
* 3 key roles of FDA
* tips for the unwary
* regulatory definitions
* submission types
* data required for approval
FDA Regulations and Medical Device Pathways to Market | Kevin Daly | Lunch & ...UCICove
The document discusses FDA regulations for medical devices. It defines a medical device and outlines the steps to determine regulatory requirements, including classifying a device and identifying premarket pathways like 510(k) or PMA. Class I devices have the least requirements while Class III devices require the most oversight like clinical trials. The document reviews elements of 510(k) submissions and other clearance options like de novo. It also discusses quality system requirements and regulations for mobile medical apps and clinical studies.
Drug Delivery -- Perspectives on the FDA Regulatory EnvironmentMichael Swit
Presentation to the Arrowhead Drug Delivery Summit, May 2009, in San Francisco, focusing on:
The FDA World –how is it changing?
Combination Product Regulation –where drug delivery intersects with agency purview
How FDA approaches combination products
Real time examples
Getting prepared --How to focus on FDA regulatory issues in drug delivery
Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD, discusses the FDA’s approach to regulation
of in vitro diagnostic tests.
Part of Dx2010, a workshop at MaRS focused on best practices and regulatory considerations for developing gene-based diagnostic and prognostic tests.
FDA Approval for Medical Devices: A Guide for Entrepreneurs | Jim Gustafson |...UCICove
About UCI Applied Innovation:
UCI Applied Innovation is a dynamic, innovative central platform for the UCI campus, entrepreneurs, inventors, the business community and investors to collaborate and move UCI research from lab to market.
About the Cove @ UCI:
To accelerate collaboration by better connecting innovation partners in Orange County, UCI Applied Innovation created the Cove, a physical, state-of-the-art hub for entrepreneurs to gather and navigate the resources available both on and off campus. The Cove is headquarters for UCI Applied Innovation, as well as houses several ecosystem partners including incubators, accelerators, angel investors, venture capitalists, mentors and legal experts.
Follow us on social media:
Facebook: @UCICove
Twitter: @UCICove
Instagram: @UCICove
LinkedIn: @UCIAppliedInnovation
For more information:
cove@uci.edu
http://innovation.uci.edu/
http://MedicalDeviceEvents.com At the 10x Medical Device Conference in 2014, presenters Carrie Kuehn, Jorge Ochoa, and Robert Packard explained why, according to data from FDA, more than 58% of 510(k) submissions were refused under FDA’s Refuse to Accept (RTA) policy during its first year of implementation.
This presentation examined some of the reasons why industry got such a bad “grade.” We discussed the RTA requirements and some of the challenges from industry’s perspective on meeting the requirements of the RTA checklist and ended with recommendations on how industry can improve its odds of getting past the RTA hurdle on the first try.
AzCI presents: Medical Device Regulations through the FDAAnitaBell
Arizona Center for Innovation (AzCI) presents: Working with Your Demographic Market (in orphan drug development)
This presentation is part of a series developed for a workshop on "How to Navigate the Biotech Regulatory Process"
The Arizona Center for Innovation is an incubator and innovation center and provides resources in support of startups getting to the next level and become successful enterprises.
FDA Regulatory Considerations for Life Sciences CompaniesMichael Swit
April 2008 presentation to Swedish-American Chamber of Commerce Entrepreneurial Days on FDA issues for product development, including focus on:
Planning, approval process, barriers to entry
FDA Regulatory Considerations for the Biomedical Start-upMichael Swit
October 7, 2005 presentation to the LARTA CAP program in Newport Beach, CA, focusing on:
* 3 key roles of FDA
* tips for the unwary
* regulatory definitions
* submission types
* data required for approval
FDA Regulations and Medical Device Pathways to Market | Kevin Daly | Lunch & ...UCICove
The document discusses FDA regulations for medical devices. It defines a medical device and outlines the steps to determine regulatory requirements, including classifying a device and identifying premarket pathways like 510(k) or PMA. Class I devices have the least requirements while Class III devices require the most oversight like clinical trials. The document reviews elements of 510(k) submissions and other clearance options like de novo. It also discusses quality system requirements and regulations for mobile medical apps and clinical studies.
Drug Delivery -- Perspectives on the FDA Regulatory EnvironmentMichael Swit
Presentation to the Arrowhead Drug Delivery Summit, May 2009, in San Francisco, focusing on:
The FDA World –how is it changing?
Combination Product Regulation –where drug delivery intersects with agency purview
How FDA approaches combination products
Real time examples
Getting prepared --How to focus on FDA regulatory issues in drug delivery
Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD, discusses the FDA’s approach to regulation
of in vitro diagnostic tests.
Part of Dx2010, a workshop at MaRS focused on best practices and regulatory considerations for developing gene-based diagnostic and prognostic tests.
FDA Approval for Medical Devices: A Guide for Entrepreneurs | Jim Gustafson |...UCICove
About UCI Applied Innovation:
UCI Applied Innovation is a dynamic, innovative central platform for the UCI campus, entrepreneurs, inventors, the business community and investors to collaborate and move UCI research from lab to market.
About the Cove @ UCI:
To accelerate collaboration by better connecting innovation partners in Orange County, UCI Applied Innovation created the Cove, a physical, state-of-the-art hub for entrepreneurs to gather and navigate the resources available both on and off campus. The Cove is headquarters for UCI Applied Innovation, as well as houses several ecosystem partners including incubators, accelerators, angel investors, venture capitalists, mentors and legal experts.
Follow us on social media:
Facebook: @UCICove
Twitter: @UCICove
Instagram: @UCICove
LinkedIn: @UCIAppliedInnovation
For more information:
cove@uci.edu
http://innovation.uci.edu/
http://MedicalDeviceEvents.com At the 10x Medical Device Conference in 2014, presenters Carrie Kuehn, Jorge Ochoa, and Robert Packard explained why, according to data from FDA, more than 58% of 510(k) submissions were refused under FDA’s Refuse to Accept (RTA) policy during its first year of implementation.
This presentation examined some of the reasons why industry got such a bad “grade.” We discussed the RTA requirements and some of the challenges from industry’s perspective on meeting the requirements of the RTA checklist and ended with recommendations on how industry can improve its odds of getting past the RTA hurdle on the first try.
AzCI presents: Medical Device Regulations through the FDAAnitaBell
Arizona Center for Innovation (AzCI) presents: Working with Your Demographic Market (in orphan drug development)
This presentation is part of a series developed for a workshop on "How to Navigate the Biotech Regulatory Process"
The Arizona Center for Innovation is an incubator and innovation center and provides resources in support of startups getting to the next level and become successful enterprises.
This presentation provides a KEY for classifying In Vitro Diagnostic Devices per FDA and EU In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulation EU 2017/746
EU Conformity Assessment information is also provided
The document discusses the FDA's regulatory pathways for medical devices. The FDA uses a risk-based classification system to categorize devices as Class I, II, or III based on risk, with Class III devices posing the highest risk. Class I devices face the fewest regulatory requirements while Class III devices require a rigorous premarket approval process. The key pathways are 510(k) clearance for Class II devices and premarket approval (PMA) for Class III devices. The FDA aims to evaluate devices throughout their lifecycle from premarket through postmarket surveillance to ensure safety and effectiveness.
How to Prepare for and Make the Most Out of your FDA Pre-Submission: Leverage...Greenlight Guru
The FDA Pre-Submission process is one the most effective tools out there to de-risk your 510(k) yet it is often both under-utilized and used improperly.
The Pre-Sub allows for device manufacture to discuss and get feedback directly from FDA on both their product development and regulatory strategy.
When used properly the Pre-Sub process can result in significant time savings to market - however when used improperly or ignored all together, this can easily result in unnecessary delays and wasted money.
This presentation covers:
- What is a Pre-Sub and why it is so important
- How to prepare and get the most out of your Pre-Sub
- The exact Pre-Sub timeline of events
- An example of the contents to include and how to format your Pre-Sub
- What you should do after your Pre-Sub
- A step-by-step case study example of the Pre-Sub process
Watch the presentation with commentary here: https://www.greenlight.guru/webinar/fda-pre-submission-process
Premarket Notification The 510(k) ProcessMichael Swit
June 5, 2012 presentation to the Food & Drug Law Institute Introduction to Medical Device Law Conference, Palo Alto, CA, focusing on:
I.The Legal Framework For 510(k) Determinations
II.510(k) Preparation – From Planning to Content
A. Predicates: researching predicates, combination predicates, and pre-amendment predicates
B. Strategy: choosing the right claim and introducing new features
C. Assessing data requirements/pre-IDE meetings
III. Device Modifications - Choosing The Right Regulatory Mechanism
IV.The FDA Review
V.What To Do When Your Substantial Equivalence Argument Is Rejected
V. Special Topics: User Fees, Combination Products
VI. Lessons Learned: Seeing The 510(k) From The Reviewer’s Perspective
VII. Recent Trends, 510(k) Reform
VIII. Case Study
AzCI presents: Specialty Programs in FDA Review and ApprovalAnitaBell
The Arizona Center for Innovation (AzCI) assists startup technology companies in turning ideas into successful businesses through focused programs, expertise, and facilities. AzCI supports companies working in areas like security, mining, agriculture, biotechnology, transportation, energy, and more. AzCI is part of the University of Arizona and helps companies connect to other entrepreneurs, industry leaders, and resources through the university.
Many emerging companies make the mistake of putting all of their resources into immediate needs, and often neglect longterm regulatory strategy concerns when it comes to submissions and approvals. Don’t neglect the strategy piece in your planning! This lunch will provide a deep-dive foundation of how to develop a regulatory strategy. Topics to be addressed include:
What are different types of regulatory submissions for devices?
What are current trends in regulatory agencies?
What regulations around devices affect your organization?
Attendees will have the opportunity to ask questions with their company’s needs in mind.
Join us and Halloran Consulting at M2D2 for this expert lunch. Food will be served.
Cutter PTCA catheter Regulatory strategy for PMDA submission_12-7-11_FINAL-1Prajakta Buva
This presentation discusses the regulatory strategy for obtaining approval of the Cutter PTCA dilation catheter in Japan. It outlines goals of obtaining the fastest approval as possible. Key steps include obtaining Foreign Manufacturer Accreditation licenses, preparing a submission dossier, conducting audits, and consulting with the PMDA. Challenges include missing technical data and non-compliance with some Japanese standards. Options to expedite approval include partial change application or pre-consultation meetings. The timeline aims for approval by June 2012 but risks delay depending on the pathway chosen and ability to resolve issues. Launch of the improved Cutter catheter could significantly increase sales and operating income for 2012.
Recalls: The First Smoke of A Mass Tort -- Overview of a Recall of an FDA-Reg...Michael Swit
The document discusses key concepts and requirements around recalls of FDA-regulated products. It defines terms like recall, correction, market withdrawal, and stock recovery. It also outlines how FDA classifies recalls based on health hazard (Class I, II, III) and what information FDA expects companies to provide during a recall, including a reason for the recall, health hazard evaluation, and recall strategy. The document advises being careful with recall information because it is discoverable. It also discusses timing rules for recalls and FDA's expectations for effectiveness checks and corrective action plans after a recall.
This document summarizes key information from a seminar on getting medical devices approved by the FDA. It discusses common reasons why companies fail FDA approval, including inadequate software documentation. The document outlines FDA guidance and standards for software documentation, design, validation, and human factors. It also discusses FDA concerns about cybersecurity for networked devices and provides an overview of FDA guidance on managing cybersecurity risks.
This document provides an overview of medical device regulation in the US and EU markets. It discusses key aspects of the regulatory process including intended use, classification, clinical evidence requirements, and approval pathways such as 510(k) and PMA. Major topics covered include regulatory strategies, claim determination, risk-based classification, clinical study design considerations, and substantial equivalence evaluations.
Clinical Affairs Excellence: Benchmarking Clinical Trial Strategies To Ensure...Best Practices
This document summarizes the findings of a benchmarking study conducted by Best Practices, LLC on clinical trial strategies for medical device companies. Key findings include:
- The average medical device company in the study had $3.8 billion in annual revenue and spent $39 million (1.1% of revenue) on clinical affairs.
- Most device companies conducted the majority (72%) of clinical trials in-house, with 22% outsourced and 4% offshore. Pharma companies outsourced more activities.
- Regulators had extensive questions about outside the US trial data for 46% of device companies and 38% felt data led to extensive regulatory conversations.
- Device companies did not out
This document summarizes medical device regulations in the United States, European Union, and India. It discusses how medical devices are classified based on risk in each region, with Class I being lowest risk and Class III being highest. The regulatory approval processes for medical devices in each location are also outlined, including applying for certification marks like the FDA clearance in the US or CE Marking in the EU. Finally, the document provides statistics on the global market share of the medical device industry and references used.
Handling of a fda inspection [compatibility mode]Kiran Kota
The document provides guidance on handling FDA inspections. It discusses key points like signing the FDA Form 482 notice, having subject matter experts available to answer questions, and reviewing documentation before providing it to inspectors. It also describes the FDA's quality system inspection approach, the different inspection classifications (NAI, VAI, OAI), and what is contained in the Establishment Inspection Report provided after an inspection.
This document outlines regulations regarding public hearings before public advisory committees at the FDA. It discusses when advisory committees should convene, their composition and purpose. Advisory committees are convened to provide independent review and recommendations to the FDA Commissioner on important public matters. The document specifies requirements for notice of advisory committee meetings, including publishing notices in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior. It also describes logistics of advisory committee meetings, including holding them in an accessible location, maintaining a quorum, and procedures for open and closed sessions.
Overcoming Regulatory, Clinical and Quality Challenges in Developing Combinat...Michael Swit
Webinar presented on May 19, 2011, sponsored by The Weinberg Group, focusing on:
* A Brief History of Combination Product Regulation
* Primary Mode of Action (PMOA) –The Key Lynchpin to FDA’s Regulatory Regime for Combination Products
* The Request for Designation (RFD) Process
* GMPs
* Post-Market Safety Reporting
* How Many Applications to File?
* User Fees
Alternative Approaches to FDA Approval for Drug and Device FirmsMichael Swit
Presentation to San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) February 12, 2015 meeting with a focus on the various approaches to drug and device approval/marketing that differ from standard method, including:
* accelerated approval
* breakthrough therapies
* fast track drugs
* priority review
June 24, 2015 Presentation to the Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Test Review Course sponsored by the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network, with a focus on regulation of ANDAs, OTC drugs, and Orphan Drugs, covering these issues relating to generic drugs:
♦ Basics
♦ User Fees
♦ Power
♦ Addressing Abuses – by Rule & Statute
♦ Biosimilars – Basics of New Law
This presentation provides a KEY for classifying In Vitro Diagnostic Devices per FDA and EU In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulation EU 2017/746
EU Conformity Assessment information is also provided
The document discusses the FDA's regulatory pathways for medical devices. The FDA uses a risk-based classification system to categorize devices as Class I, II, or III based on risk, with Class III devices posing the highest risk. Class I devices face the fewest regulatory requirements while Class III devices require a rigorous premarket approval process. The key pathways are 510(k) clearance for Class II devices and premarket approval (PMA) for Class III devices. The FDA aims to evaluate devices throughout their lifecycle from premarket through postmarket surveillance to ensure safety and effectiveness.
How to Prepare for and Make the Most Out of your FDA Pre-Submission: Leverage...Greenlight Guru
The FDA Pre-Submission process is one the most effective tools out there to de-risk your 510(k) yet it is often both under-utilized and used improperly.
The Pre-Sub allows for device manufacture to discuss and get feedback directly from FDA on both their product development and regulatory strategy.
When used properly the Pre-Sub process can result in significant time savings to market - however when used improperly or ignored all together, this can easily result in unnecessary delays and wasted money.
This presentation covers:
- What is a Pre-Sub and why it is so important
- How to prepare and get the most out of your Pre-Sub
- The exact Pre-Sub timeline of events
- An example of the contents to include and how to format your Pre-Sub
- What you should do after your Pre-Sub
- A step-by-step case study example of the Pre-Sub process
Watch the presentation with commentary here: https://www.greenlight.guru/webinar/fda-pre-submission-process
Premarket Notification The 510(k) ProcessMichael Swit
June 5, 2012 presentation to the Food & Drug Law Institute Introduction to Medical Device Law Conference, Palo Alto, CA, focusing on:
I.The Legal Framework For 510(k) Determinations
II.510(k) Preparation – From Planning to Content
A. Predicates: researching predicates, combination predicates, and pre-amendment predicates
B. Strategy: choosing the right claim and introducing new features
C. Assessing data requirements/pre-IDE meetings
III. Device Modifications - Choosing The Right Regulatory Mechanism
IV.The FDA Review
V.What To Do When Your Substantial Equivalence Argument Is Rejected
V. Special Topics: User Fees, Combination Products
VI. Lessons Learned: Seeing The 510(k) From The Reviewer’s Perspective
VII. Recent Trends, 510(k) Reform
VIII. Case Study
AzCI presents: Specialty Programs in FDA Review and ApprovalAnitaBell
The Arizona Center for Innovation (AzCI) assists startup technology companies in turning ideas into successful businesses through focused programs, expertise, and facilities. AzCI supports companies working in areas like security, mining, agriculture, biotechnology, transportation, energy, and more. AzCI is part of the University of Arizona and helps companies connect to other entrepreneurs, industry leaders, and resources through the university.
Many emerging companies make the mistake of putting all of their resources into immediate needs, and often neglect longterm regulatory strategy concerns when it comes to submissions and approvals. Don’t neglect the strategy piece in your planning! This lunch will provide a deep-dive foundation of how to develop a regulatory strategy. Topics to be addressed include:
What are different types of regulatory submissions for devices?
What are current trends in regulatory agencies?
What regulations around devices affect your organization?
Attendees will have the opportunity to ask questions with their company’s needs in mind.
Join us and Halloran Consulting at M2D2 for this expert lunch. Food will be served.
Cutter PTCA catheter Regulatory strategy for PMDA submission_12-7-11_FINAL-1Prajakta Buva
This presentation discusses the regulatory strategy for obtaining approval of the Cutter PTCA dilation catheter in Japan. It outlines goals of obtaining the fastest approval as possible. Key steps include obtaining Foreign Manufacturer Accreditation licenses, preparing a submission dossier, conducting audits, and consulting with the PMDA. Challenges include missing technical data and non-compliance with some Japanese standards. Options to expedite approval include partial change application or pre-consultation meetings. The timeline aims for approval by June 2012 but risks delay depending on the pathway chosen and ability to resolve issues. Launch of the improved Cutter catheter could significantly increase sales and operating income for 2012.
Recalls: The First Smoke of A Mass Tort -- Overview of a Recall of an FDA-Reg...Michael Swit
The document discusses key concepts and requirements around recalls of FDA-regulated products. It defines terms like recall, correction, market withdrawal, and stock recovery. It also outlines how FDA classifies recalls based on health hazard (Class I, II, III) and what information FDA expects companies to provide during a recall, including a reason for the recall, health hazard evaluation, and recall strategy. The document advises being careful with recall information because it is discoverable. It also discusses timing rules for recalls and FDA's expectations for effectiveness checks and corrective action plans after a recall.
This document summarizes key information from a seminar on getting medical devices approved by the FDA. It discusses common reasons why companies fail FDA approval, including inadequate software documentation. The document outlines FDA guidance and standards for software documentation, design, validation, and human factors. It also discusses FDA concerns about cybersecurity for networked devices and provides an overview of FDA guidance on managing cybersecurity risks.
This document provides an overview of medical device regulation in the US and EU markets. It discusses key aspects of the regulatory process including intended use, classification, clinical evidence requirements, and approval pathways such as 510(k) and PMA. Major topics covered include regulatory strategies, claim determination, risk-based classification, clinical study design considerations, and substantial equivalence evaluations.
Clinical Affairs Excellence: Benchmarking Clinical Trial Strategies To Ensure...Best Practices
This document summarizes the findings of a benchmarking study conducted by Best Practices, LLC on clinical trial strategies for medical device companies. Key findings include:
- The average medical device company in the study had $3.8 billion in annual revenue and spent $39 million (1.1% of revenue) on clinical affairs.
- Most device companies conducted the majority (72%) of clinical trials in-house, with 22% outsourced and 4% offshore. Pharma companies outsourced more activities.
- Regulators had extensive questions about outside the US trial data for 46% of device companies and 38% felt data led to extensive regulatory conversations.
- Device companies did not out
This document summarizes medical device regulations in the United States, European Union, and India. It discusses how medical devices are classified based on risk in each region, with Class I being lowest risk and Class III being highest. The regulatory approval processes for medical devices in each location are also outlined, including applying for certification marks like the FDA clearance in the US or CE Marking in the EU. Finally, the document provides statistics on the global market share of the medical device industry and references used.
Handling of a fda inspection [compatibility mode]Kiran Kota
The document provides guidance on handling FDA inspections. It discusses key points like signing the FDA Form 482 notice, having subject matter experts available to answer questions, and reviewing documentation before providing it to inspectors. It also describes the FDA's quality system inspection approach, the different inspection classifications (NAI, VAI, OAI), and what is contained in the Establishment Inspection Report provided after an inspection.
This document outlines regulations regarding public hearings before public advisory committees at the FDA. It discusses when advisory committees should convene, their composition and purpose. Advisory committees are convened to provide independent review and recommendations to the FDA Commissioner on important public matters. The document specifies requirements for notice of advisory committee meetings, including publishing notices in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior. It also describes logistics of advisory committee meetings, including holding them in an accessible location, maintaining a quorum, and procedures for open and closed sessions.
Overcoming Regulatory, Clinical and Quality Challenges in Developing Combinat...Michael Swit
Webinar presented on May 19, 2011, sponsored by The Weinberg Group, focusing on:
* A Brief History of Combination Product Regulation
* Primary Mode of Action (PMOA) –The Key Lynchpin to FDA’s Regulatory Regime for Combination Products
* The Request for Designation (RFD) Process
* GMPs
* Post-Market Safety Reporting
* How Many Applications to File?
* User Fees
Alternative Approaches to FDA Approval for Drug and Device FirmsMichael Swit
Presentation to San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) February 12, 2015 meeting with a focus on the various approaches to drug and device approval/marketing that differ from standard method, including:
* accelerated approval
* breakthrough therapies
* fast track drugs
* priority review
June 24, 2015 Presentation to the Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Test Review Course sponsored by the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network, with a focus on regulation of ANDAs, OTC drugs, and Orphan Drugs, covering these issues relating to generic drugs:
♦ Basics
♦ User Fees
♦ Power
♦ Addressing Abuses – by Rule & Statute
♦ Biosimilars – Basics of New Law
Successfully Responding to FDA Inspections (483s) & Warning LettersMichael Swit
This document summarizes a presentation on responding to FDA inspections and warning letters. It discusses Commissioner Hamburg's 2009 speech that revived FDA's compliance culture and enforcement efforts. It outlines FDA's expectations for timely responses to Form 483 observations and warning letters. It provides tips for how companies can prepare for and handle inspections, including designating personnel roles and training employees. It also offers guidance on writing effective responses to Form 483s and warning letters that address each violation, present corrective actions, and minimize future regulatory risks.
Regulatory Considerations in Product DevelopmentMichael Swit
Presentation to the LARTA (www.larta.org) NIH-CAP Workshop in November 2011 on how to develop FDA-regulated products, with a focus on planning, working with FDA,
Latest Developments in and the Future of the Regulatory Landscape for Approv...Michael Swit
Presentation on "Latest Developments in and the Future of the
Regulatory Landscape for Approving Treatments
for Orphan and Rare Diseases," given at the Orphan Drugs & Rare Diseases -- 2018 Americas West Coast Conference.
June 25, 2018. San Diego, CA.
June 14, 2018 presentation to the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Review Course on the basics of FDA regulation of generic drugs and biosimilars.
Ensuring FDA Regulatory Success for Biomedical Companies -- Key Lessons for S...Michael Swit
Supporting Materials for Michael Swit's Panel remarks at the Workshop Co-sponsored by the Orange County Regulatory Affairs (OCRA) Discussion Group and the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) @ UCI Applied Innovation
Alternative Approaches to FDA Approval for Drug and Device FirmsMichael Swit
This document summarizes alternative approaches for obtaining FDA approval for drugs and devices, including Subpart E regulations, accelerated approval, fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, and FDA's review priority system. It discusses provisions of each pathway that aim to expedite development and review, such as early consultation meetings, approval based on surrogate endpoints, and rolling review of applications. The document also provides explanations and examples of key terms used in these pathways.
FDA Regulations and Medical Device Pathways to MarketMethodSense, Inc.
Bringing your medical device to market requires in-depth attention to its safety, reliability and compliance. In addition to designing a quality medical device, it’s critical that you anticipate and address the requirements that allow you to introduce it to the market successfully.
Life Science consulting firm, MethodSense, discusses important FDA regulations as they relate to bringing a medical device to market, including 21 CFR Part 821, 510(k) approval and 21 CFR Part 11.
FDA Regulations and Medical Device Pathways to MarketMethodSense, Inc.
Bringing your medical device to market requires in-depth attention to its safety, reliability and compliance. In addition to designing a quality medical device, it’s critical that you anticipate and address the requirements that allow you to introduce it to the market successfully.
Life Science consulting firm, MethodSense, discusses important FDA regulations as they relate to bringing a medical device to market, including 21 CFR Part 821, 510(k) approval and 21 CFR Part 11.
FDA classify Medical Devices and how to report device problems A Systematic R...Pubrica
The typical time it takes to get a device to market is 3 to 7 years, compared to 12 years for pharmaceuticals. However, there are concerns that the Food and Drug Administration's Systematic Review Writing methods may not be adequate to satisfy the required guarantees of safety and efficacy.
Learn More : https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/
Reference: https://bit.ly/3xNHUsC
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
FDA classify Medical Devices and how to report device problems A Systematic R...Pubrica
The typical time it takes to get a device to market is 3 to 7 years, compared to 12 years for pharmaceuticals. However, there are concerns that the Food and Drug Administration's Systematic Review Writing methods may not be adequate to satisfy the required guarantees of safety and efficacy.
Learn More : https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/
Reference: https://bit.ly/3xNHUsC
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
FDA Regulatory Considerations for the Biomedical CompaniesMichael Swit
Presentation to the LARTA (www.larta.org) NIH-CAP Workshop in October 2007 on how to develop FDA-regulated products, with a focus on planning, working with FDA, regulatory pitfalls, clinical studies, etc.
Combination Products, Orphan Drugs and OTC DrugsMichael Swit
Presentation to the 2016 Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Test Review Course sponsored by the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) in July 2017, with a focus on:
A Brief History of Combination Product Regulation
Primary Mode of Action (PMOA) –The Key Lynchpin to FDA’s Regulatory Regime for Combination Products
The Request for Designation (RFD) Process
GMPs
Post-Market Safety Reporting
How Many Applications to File?
User Fees
The drug development and review process involves several stages. Drugs are first tested on animals to assess safety before human clinical trials. Clinical trials involve 3 phases testing on increasingly large groups of human subjects to evaluate safety, efficacy, and optimal dosage. If results are promising, drug sponsors submit a New Drug Application to the FDA including all trial data. The FDA thoroughly reviews the application over 6-10 months before approving the drug or requesting more information. Post-approval, the FDA continues monitoring the drug for safety issues and requires further studies if needed.
The document provides an overview of the Waxman-Hatch Act of 1984, which established the modern generic drug approval pathway in the United States. It discusses the reasons for its creation, key provisions such as bioequivalence standards and patent certification requirements, and subsequent amendments. The Act sought to balance increased availability of low-cost generic drugs with incentives for continued pharmaceutical innovation.
This SlideShare gives an overview on how a drug is discovered, researched, developed, tested and reviewed for approval. It follows the current standard of approval set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a federal agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. The process is generally divided into 4 Stages: Pre-Clinical, Clinical, New Drug Application (NDA) Review & Post-Marketing.
Alternative Approaches to FDA Approval for Drug and Device FirmsMichael Swit
Webinar sponsored by Compliance2Go focusing on different ways that drug and medical device firms can secure approval of products outside of traditional approaches. Presentation covers:
* accelerated approval
* fast track drugs
* priority review
* special 510(k)
* abbreviated 510(k)
Presentation to the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) on the various approaches to drug and device approval/marketing that differ from standard method, including:
* accelerated approval
* fast track drugs
* priority review
* special 510(k)
* abbreviated 510(k)
Drug Safety – An Overview of FDA Powers under FDAAAMichael Swit
Presentation to Conference on Marketing Applications jointly sponsored by San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) and the Orange County Regulatory Affairs (OCRA) Discussion Group, in November 2009. Talk focused on the new powers granted FDA under the 2007 Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA).
Similar to FDA Legal & Regulatory Considerations for Biomedical Startups (20)
GMP Review -- Legal Letter from America Column -- How Data Integrity Issues S...Michael Swit
Article appearing in the October 2018 issue of GMP Review by Michael A. Swit explores how data integrity issues sunk a $4.3 billion acquisition of Akorn by Fresenius. Article stresses lessons not just for quality professionals, but also their top management.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 8: Handling Promotional Com...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices,November 2, 2018, Boston.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 7: FTC RegulationMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices,
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 6: First Amendment, Off-Lab...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 2, 2018, Boston.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 5: Social Media & InternetMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 4: FDA Enforcement – Action...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 3: Disseminating Scientific...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising --Part 2: Direct-to-Consumer AdsMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices,November 1-2, 2018, Boston
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 1: The BasicsMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston.
Regulatory, Quality & Clinical Due Diligence: The Oft Overlooked Keys to Suc...Michael Swit
June 23, 2010 webinar sponsored by The Weinberg Group, with an emphasis on key issues to explore during due diligence in acquiring FDA-regulated products or companies.
Quality Considerations in Due Diligence for Pharmaceutical TransactionsMichael Swit
The document discusses quality considerations in due diligence for pharmaceutical transactions. It outlines general considerations for due diligence structure and challenges. It emphasizes that quality matters because drugs made in non-compliant facilities can be considered adulterated by the FDA and result in criminal and civil penalties. The document provides examples of problems to look for, including manufacturing, pharmacovigilance, compliance history, FDA inspection history, and audits. It discusses techniques for probing issues, including reviewing FDA correspondence and litigation. Special considerations are outlined for different drug development stages. Helpful charts on diligence issues by stage and analyzing identified issues are presented.
Presentation on Critical Legal Issues Facing GMP ComplianceMichael Swit
August 27, 2018 Presentation to the 23rd Annual GMP by the Sea Conference in Cambridge, Maryland, focusing on the potential legal consequences faced by companies that violate FDA's requirements on Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) for drugs and biologics
Overview of FDA Drug Manufacturing RequirementsMichael Swit
Presentation on FDA Regulation of Drug Manufacturing to the Introduction to Drug Law Course sponsored by the Food & Drug Law Institute (FDLI) on July 25, 2018 in San Francisco.
Combination Products, Orphan Drugs, and OTC DrugsMichael Swit
Presentation to the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Exam review course on FDA regulation of combination products, orphan drugs, and OTC drugs.
Recent FDA Developments in Digital Health & Clinical Decision Support SoftwareMichael Swit
June 7, 2018 presentation at the 4th Annual Medical Device Summit, sponsored by ComplianceOnline, in San Francisco, focusing on the impact of the 21st Century Cures Act and other developments on how FDA regulates software in the medical device arena, including mobile medical applications.
FDA Inspections: Handling the Consequences -- or Understanding How Ugly It C...Michael Swit
Presentation to the MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2018 East, given on May 22, 2018 in Arlington, Virginia, and focusing on the collateral consequences of negative FDA inspections in the clinical research arena
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Frameworkdevaki57
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdfSunsetWestLegalGroup
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
FDA Legal & Regulatory Considerations for Biomedical Startups
1. FDA Legal & Regulatory
Considerations for Biomedical
Startups
Tech Coast Angels
San Diego, California
March 7, 2003
FDACounsel.com
2. Michael A. Swit, Esq.
Michael A. Swit, Esq.
Law Offices of Michael A. Swit
539 Samuel Ct.
Encinitas, CA 92024
760-815-4762; fax: 760-454-2979
mswit@fdacounsel.com
FDACounsel.com
4. FDA's Three Key Development
Roles:
"Gatekeeper" to the marketplace --
the new drug approval process
"Cop on the beat" or "Enforcer" --
ensuring quality compliance via
inspection and enforcement actions (e.g.
criminal charges)
"Sentinel" of Safety Concerns - during
development and post-approval
FDACounsel.com
5. The Approval Gate …
Preliminary Considerations --
Determining the Regulatory Status of
the product
Is it a "drug", "device" or "biologic"?
Drug:
described in USP or
intended (via labeling)
to affect the body of man or other animals
to be used in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation,
treatment or prevention of disease in man or other
animals
FDACounsel.com
6. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
Is it a "drug", "device" or "biologic"?
Device: defined as involving: "instrument, apparatus,
implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro
reagent, or "similar or related article including any
component, part or accessory."
in USP/NF or
intended to be used in diagnosis … cure, mitigation, treatment or
prevention of disease or other conditions
intended to affect the body of man
FDACounsel.com
7. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
Is it a "drug", "device" or "biologic"?
Thus -- device definition can capture products that
resemble drugs if they do not achieve their result via
being metabolized in the body or via chemical action
within or on the body -- regulated by FDA Center for
Devices & Radiological Health (CDRH)
Examples of "drug-like" devices:
Ultrasound contrast media
Contact lens solutions
FDACounsel.com
8. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
Is it a "drug", "device" or "biologic"?
Biologic --
Generally, if derived from human or animal tissue;
used to be regulated by FDA Center for Biologics (CBER) using
approval standards similar to CDER
therapeutic biotech products going to CDER
vaccines – remain behind
NOTE: "true" biotech products usually are biologics
FDACounsel.com
9. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
Is it a "drug", "device" or "biologic"?
OR BOTH??
"Combination" or "hybrid" products --
are regulated per their "primary mode of action" --
but this may be difficult to discern -- get clarification very
early as will impact FDA Center you deal with
can request in writing -- under FDAMA § 416, FDA can't
later change its mind w/o your consent or public health
reasons exist
FDACounsel.com
10. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
What type of submission is needed to get FDA
approval or clearance?
Drugs:
Full New Drug Application (NDA)
505(b)(2) NDA or "Paper NDA"
Abbreviated New Drug Application
The OTC Drug route -- Abreva (Avanir/SKB)
NDA
OTC Review monograph change
FDACounsel.com
11. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
What type of submission is needed to get FDA
approval or clearance?
Devices:
Premarket Approval Application (PMA) --
clinical studies will be needed
Premarket Notification under § 510k --
clinical studies MAY be needed (or wanted)
FDACounsel.com
12. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
What type of submission is needed to get FDA
approval or clearance?
Biologics
Biologic License Application (BLA)
no generic versions now possible – may change …
FDACounsel.com
13. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
What quantity and quality of data will be
demanded by FDA to show safety &
effectiveness?
Will vary -- FDA has extensive discretion
here
Key task -- try to get clarity as soon as
possible in the process -- Ways to do so:
Pre-IND meeting -- encouraged by FDA prior to start of
human clinicals
End of Phase 2 Meeting - also encouraged -- here's where
you want to "lock" them inFDACounsel.com
14. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
What quantity and quality of data?
FDAMA § 119(a) --
FDA must meet with you on design of studies; and
Any agreement on study design must be written and
can't be changed later w/o your consent unless a new
safety or effectiveness issue arises later
FDACounsel.com
15. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
What quantity and quality of data?
FDAMA § 115(a) -- data from must one
adequate and well-controlled study and
confirmatory evidence can be used to show
substantial evidence of effectiveness
FDACounsel.com
16. The Approval Gate …
Regulatory Status of the product -
con'd…
What quantity and quality of data?
"Pure" proof of clinical effectiveness may
not be needed -- e.g., under “Fast Track,”
may be able to use:
Surrogate endpoints
Clinical endpoints
Phase IV study will be needed usually
FDACounsel.com
17. The Approval Gate …
FDA -- Legal Barriers to entry
Orphan Drug Exclusivity -- 7 years for drug for
orphan indication
can't "remake the wheel"
Waxman-Hatch Exclusivity
5 years -- New Chemical Entities
3 years -- New uses, dosage forms, etc. of previously-
approved products
FDACounsel.com
18. The Approval Gate …
The FDA Review -- Priority and
Speed
"Fast Track" -- FDAMA § 112
treats a "serious or life threatening condition"
shows "potential to address unmet medical needs for
such condition"
If so, FDA must "facilitate the development and expedite
and review" of the drug
Request at time of or after IND filing
See 1998 Guidance on Fast Track
http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/2112fnl.pdf
FDACounsel.com
19. The Approval Gate …
The FDA Review -- Priority and
Speed
General NDA classification system
1 -- New molecular entity
2 -- New Salt of Previously Approved Drug (not a new
molecular entity)
3 -- New Formulation of Previously Approved Drug (not a
new salt OR a new molecular entity)
4 -- New Combination of Two or More Drugs
5 -- Already Marketed Drug Product - Duplication (i.e.,
new manufacturer)
FDACounsel.com
20. The Approval Gate …
The FDA Review -- Priority and
Speed
General NDA classification system
6 -- New Indication (claim) for Already Marketed Drug (includes
switch in marketing status from prescription to OTC)
7 -- Already Marketed Drug Product - No Previously Approved
NDA (e.g., Unithroid)
NDA Review Priority:
S - Standard -- drugs similar to currently available drugs
P - Priority -- significant advances over existing treatments.
FDACounsel.com
21. The Approval Gate …
The FDA Review -- Pre-Approval
Inspections -- Expect one if NDA is:
new chemical or molecular entities;
for a narrow therapeutic range drug
the first approval for the applicant; or
are sponsored by a company with a history of CGMP
problems or that has not been inspected for a considerable
period.
CDER's Compliance Program Guide 7346.832 @
http://www.fda.gov/cder/handbook/insaccep.htm
FDACounsel.com
22. The Approval Gate …
A few tips to avoid problems in drug
development and speed FDA
review:
If outsourcing, audit aggressively your "vendors":
CROs
Clinical investigators
Contract manufacturers
IRBs
Duke
University of Oklahoma
Joint venture partners
FDACounsel.com
23. The Approval Gate …
Tips to avoid problems & speed review…
Make sure R&D and Sales & Marketing are talking
early on -- ensure the indication being studied is one you
want to sell
If planning to get Medicare reimbursement, make
sure:
start the reimbursement qualification process early
study your drug in Medicare-age patients
FDACounsel.com
24. The Approval Gate …
Tips to avoid problems & speed review…
Study and File electronically
Respond to FDA deficiency letters during review
promptly, fully, and honestly
remember -- there are these folks called products liability
plaintiffs lawyers and Securities class actions folks waiting for
you to make a mistake
Don't bury your head to problems -- investigate and
disclose promptly
FDACounsel.com
25. The Approval Gate …
Hopefully, will open for you!!
But the odds are long, the cost is high,
and the time is lengthy
Good luck!!
FDACounsel.com