Eye Witness Eyewitness Misidentification Name Class Date Professor Eyewitness Misidentification Eyewitness identification refers to people who have viewed a crime or some part of the crime. While it would seem someone seeing a crime with their own two eyes would be a credible witness this is just not the case. The memory is a tricky thing constantly changing and adapting as new information is introduced. DNA testing has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that over 100 people have been found to be falsely convicted in large part due to eye witness testimony that was in fact false. Eye witness testimony can easily become contaminated. In cases involving trauma the witness focuses more on the weapon and suggestive practices by police can cause errors in the testimony. Research has shown the human memory is flawed and cannot produce exact recall. Instead, witness memory is like any other evidence at a crime scene; it must be preserved carefully and retrieved methodically, or it can be contaminated (Wells. 2007). In psychology many different research studies have been conducted to learn why the witnesses will select the wrong suspect especially when trauma is involved. High stress situations, such as a murder, armed robbery, or rape can cause eye witnesses testimony to become skewed. Human memory is not a tape recorder and cannot be rewound to give a perfect account of what happened (Morgan, 2004). The brain will fill in areas were the memory is lacking cause the eyewitness misidentification to occur. Weapons focus is another discovered cause of eye witness testimony that is inaccurate. If a weapons is used the witness will focus more on the weapon and less on the face of the suspect causing any identification to be less than accurate because they only get glimpses of the face of the suspect. Next suggestive identification, which mostly occurs in the lineup stage, refers to actions by police of even the witness that result in a misidentification. Research has shown a correlation between the lineup and the misidentification. Psychological factors in eye witness misidentification discovered include relative judgment and malleability of witness certainty. Relative judgment in correlation to the lineup refers to the tendency of the eye witness to compare the potential suspects with their memory of the incident. The witness will then select the person who appears to look like the suspect they viewed. If there is any stress of trauma involved the memory becomes even more susceptible to change. The malleability of witness certainty refers to how certain the witness is when making the identification. The malleability of the witness will depend on their level of confidence they are making the right identification not based on memory but from cues by law enforcement suggesting their selection is correct. These cues can be verbal or nonverbal. Once the witness receivies confirmation they have selected th ...