n early 2020, when the novel coronavirus began to spread around the world, it became increasingly clear that the most effective way to combat the raging pandemic would be for the majority of the population to develop immunity — whether through natural infection or vaccination.
Insights on Americans' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccines, with effective language to build confidence in vaccination. Based on a poll conducted Dec. 21-22, 2020, by Frank Luntz and the de Beaumont Foundation in partnership with the American Public Health Association, the National Collaborative for Health Equity, and Resolve to Save Lives, an Initiative of Vital Strategies.
Should individual rights (e.g., parents’ right to decide whether to .docxmanningchassidy
Should individual rights (e.g., parents’ right to decide whether to vaccinate their children) be compromised to control the spread of communicable diseases for the good of society?
discussion. The childcare facility requirements/guidelines are every child must be vaccinated to attend this specific school. He was told a few schools in the community excepted exemptions for vaccinations, however not this school.
The definition of va
ccination is
to administer a injection to help the immune system develop protection from disease (Wikipedia, 2021). Vaccines contain a virus in a weakened, live, or killed state or proteins or toxins from the organism. Vaccines help prevent sickness from infectious disease by stimulating the body's adaptive immunity. When a large percentage of a population is vaccinated, herd immunity results. Herd immunity protects those who may be immunocompromised and cannot get a vaccine because even a weakened version would harm them (Wikipedia, 2021). The vaccination policy in the United States is a subgroup of the U. S. health policy that deals with immunization against infectious disease.
I feel the individual rights of the parents who made a conscious decision not to vaccinate their child should not be persecuted. The parents' decision should be respected, but when the decision to not vaccinate their child may negatively affect the lives of others, the parents should be held accountable legally and financially. A population that is appropriately vaccinated against highly infectious diseases is a common good to its members' very society. Is it ethical to subject my child to the risk associated with receiving vaccines, and another parent is hesitant or refuses to have their child vaccinated? Is it right for that child to reap the benefits of herd immunity? The "herd immunity" or "community immunity" is fragile for measles. It does not take many unvaccinated individuals to approach the tipping point at which vaccine coverage levels are low, resulting in increased preventable infection levels (Hendrix et al., 2016). Many parents choose not to vaccinate their children, which is globally causing a resurgence in vaccine-preventable diseases. Parents are hesitant to vaccinate because religious beliefs are usually linked to the refusal of all vaccines or personal beliefs. Some parents believe natural immunity is better and more effective than immunity acquired from vaccinations. Safety concerns are the most significant reason parents are hesitant and refusing to vaccinate their children, especially with the known link between vaccines and autism. The desire for additional information causes hesitancy and refusal because parents feel more in-depth information about the vaccines should be accessible to review, enabling them to make better-informed decisions (Akoum, 2019).
In the United States, many safety precautions are required by law to help ensure that the vaccines we receive are reliable and safe. CO ...
Insights on Americans' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccines, with effective language to build confidence in vaccination. Based on a poll conducted Dec. 21-22, 2020, by Frank Luntz and the de Beaumont Foundation in partnership with the American Public Health Association, the National Collaborative for Health Equity, and Resolve to Save Lives, an Initiative of Vital Strategies.
Should individual rights (e.g., parents’ right to decide whether to .docxmanningchassidy
Should individual rights (e.g., parents’ right to decide whether to vaccinate their children) be compromised to control the spread of communicable diseases for the good of society?
discussion. The childcare facility requirements/guidelines are every child must be vaccinated to attend this specific school. He was told a few schools in the community excepted exemptions for vaccinations, however not this school.
The definition of va
ccination is
to administer a injection to help the immune system develop protection from disease (Wikipedia, 2021). Vaccines contain a virus in a weakened, live, or killed state or proteins or toxins from the organism. Vaccines help prevent sickness from infectious disease by stimulating the body's adaptive immunity. When a large percentage of a population is vaccinated, herd immunity results. Herd immunity protects those who may be immunocompromised and cannot get a vaccine because even a weakened version would harm them (Wikipedia, 2021). The vaccination policy in the United States is a subgroup of the U. S. health policy that deals with immunization against infectious disease.
I feel the individual rights of the parents who made a conscious decision not to vaccinate their child should not be persecuted. The parents' decision should be respected, but when the decision to not vaccinate their child may negatively affect the lives of others, the parents should be held accountable legally and financially. A population that is appropriately vaccinated against highly infectious diseases is a common good to its members' very society. Is it ethical to subject my child to the risk associated with receiving vaccines, and another parent is hesitant or refuses to have their child vaccinated? Is it right for that child to reap the benefits of herd immunity? The "herd immunity" or "community immunity" is fragile for measles. It does not take many unvaccinated individuals to approach the tipping point at which vaccine coverage levels are low, resulting in increased preventable infection levels (Hendrix et al., 2016). Many parents choose not to vaccinate their children, which is globally causing a resurgence in vaccine-preventable diseases. Parents are hesitant to vaccinate because religious beliefs are usually linked to the refusal of all vaccines or personal beliefs. Some parents believe natural immunity is better and more effective than immunity acquired from vaccinations. Safety concerns are the most significant reason parents are hesitant and refusing to vaccinate their children, especially with the known link between vaccines and autism. The desire for additional information causes hesitancy and refusal because parents feel more in-depth information about the vaccines should be accessible to review, enabling them to make better-informed decisions (Akoum, 2019).
In the United States, many safety precautions are required by law to help ensure that the vaccines we receive are reliable and safe. CO ...
Running head UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docxjoellemurphey
Running head: UNIT 8 PROJECT
1
UNIT 8 PROJECT
2
Unit 8 Project
Name
Community Health Assessment
Affiliated University
April 02, 2015
Abstract
This project is designed to give a bigger picture of the information so far covered in this course unit. It will provide information from project four which was about social behavior theories and its roots and unit six that concerned about Influenza vaccination in senior citizens 65 and over. It will also give some information from project two which was about the role of assessment in public health. Information about child obesity as a health problem in my community will be provided, and a detailed description of how data will be provided for this health problem assessment. A completed health assessment information using a U.S Census on my community and the evaluation of this information, and the information about who may be affected by this child obesity health evaluation and a plan of action, conclusion and a reference page where information was gathered.
Unit 8 Project
U.S Census data on my County in the State of Maryland
Montgomery County is where I live, located in the state of Maryland. Its population as of 2013 was estimated to be 1,016,677 according to (United States Census Bureau), with a racial breakdown of 62.6% white alone, 18.6% Black and African American alone,0.7% American Indian and Alaskan Natives alone, Asians 14.9%,Native Hawaiian and pacific Islanders 0.1%,Two or more races 3.1%,Hispanic and Latino 18.3%.Those who are not Latinos or Hispanic comprise of 47.0% .Female persons comprise of 51.8% and no information was provided about male. Senior citizens sixty five years and over take up 13.3% .Information for people who are disabled was not provided where as children under five years take up a 6.5% and those under 18 years comprised of 23.6%. (United States Census Bureau)
Influenza Vaccination Health Assessment from Unit 6
Influenza is a deadly virus that attacks the nose, throat and lungs and it can be spread from one person to another if a sick person sneezes or coughs without covering their mouth and the other person inhales it. In United States alone, Influenza is estimated to be responsible for 36,000 deaths, and 110,000 to 200,000 hospitalizations ("Influenza vaccination," 2003). It is a virus that is prevented mainly through immunization. The world at large and the U.S government in particular, has tried their level best to conduct public health campaigns that encourage influenza vaccination but despite all the effort, a number of people do not turn up due to varied reasons. In such helpless situations an assessment can be carried out to help health care advocates find out factors affecting vaccine commitment. A good example of this is from county of Los Angeles where immunization was carried out to people who are 65 and over noted to be one of those at high risk but to their surprise a few categories of people didn’t turn up for immunization. Results from Los Angeles Cou ...
Women, the Black community and Gen Z are the three groups most likely to resist receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, according to a recent study conducted by LevLane Inc. and MarketVision Research, Inc.
The study of 471 adults was conducted to gain insight into which groups are most resistant to the vaccine, why they are wary, and what can be done to overcome their worries.
The research found that more than a quarter of participants are resistant to receiving the vaccination citing concerns around medical privacy, levels of confusion and unfavorable reviews of the rollout. Nearly half of the women surveyed, 48%, said they would not receive the vaccine if it were offered to them today, with 30% of men who would also refuse.
The study also identified the reasons for the hesitancy, with 51% of participants saying the vaccines were developed too quickly, and 47% being unsure of side effects.
the graying of america challenges and controversies spring 20.docxoreo10
the graying of america: challenges and controversies spring 2012 17
Can Health Care
Rationing Ever
Be Rational?
David A. Gruenewald
Case Study
Mr. M. was a 77-year-old decisionally incapacitated
long-term nursing home resident with chronic schizo-
phrenia who was admitted to the hospital with a
bacterial pneumonia. His past medical history was
notable for deteriorating functional status over the
past 2-3 years, urinary retention requiring chronic
indwelling bladder catheterization, and two recent
hospitalizations for urinary tract infections leading
to sepsis. He developed respiratory failure soon after
admission and was intubated and placed on mechani-
cal ventilation. Follow-up studies suggested worsen-
ing pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syn-
drome (ARDS), as well as worsening kidney function.
The patient was unable to participate in any decision
making. His guardian requested that cardiopulmo-
nary resuscitation and all other intensive care be pro-
vided if necessary, including dialysis should Mr. M.’s
kidney failure continue to worsen. After five days of
mechanical ventilation, the patient was weaned from
the ventilator and extubated. The palliative care ser-
vice was consulted following the extubation; his criti-
cal care team questioned whether it would be appro-
priate to re-intubate the patient if he again developed
respiratory failure. The palliative care team contacted
Mr. M.’s brother, his only living relative, who felt the
patient’s quality of life was poor and believed the
patient would not want aggressive medical care. The
staff at his nursing home was contacted, as well as
the patient’s mental health case manager, who had all
known Mr. M. for many years. All concurred with his
brother’s assessment. Additionally, the nursing home
staff said that Mr. M. would not be able to return there
if the plan was to continue more intensive medical
management of his worsening health conditions. Hos-
pice care was discussed with these parties, and it was
thought that choosing hospice would best represent
the patient’s wishes under the circumstances. The pal-
liative care team contacted his guardian and explained
the patient’s medical situation and its implications
for his ongoing care (including the need for physical
restraints, loss of stable nursing home placement, and
confinement to the acute care hospital environment
for the duration of his acute illness). Based on this new
David A. Gruenewald, M.D., is an Associate Professor of
Medicine at the University of Washington School of Medi-
cine in Seattle, Washington, and the Associate Director of the
Palliative Medicine Fellowship at the University of Wash-
ington. He is the Medical Director of the Palliative Care and
Hospice Service at VA Puget Sound Health Care System in
Seattle, Washington. He received his Bachelor of Arts (B. A.)
degree from Reed College in Portland, Oregon, and his Medical
Doctor (M.D.) degree from the University of C ...
Breaking news hit early this week regarding potential problems with Johnson & Johnson’s one-shot COVID vaccine, causing the FDA and the CDC to recommend pausing the administration of the vaccine until further investigation can be completed. On top of canceled or rescheduled vaccine appointments, this news left many people wondering what this means for the overall vaccine administration efforts and what changes they could expect to see...
In this webinar, Dr. Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the CDC, and Charysse Nunez, insights lead for the Ad Council’s COVID Campaign, provided updates on the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations, and communications efforts. This webinar was put on by the Public Health Communications Collaborative.
1. Coalition ProposalVaccination Policy for Infectious Disease P.docxmonicafrancis71118
1. Coalition Proposal
Vaccination Policy for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control
Scope of the Problem
Vaccines have done an excellent job at preventing many diseases, some of which can be deadly if not prevented. When bacteria or viruses enter the body, they immediately begin to attack and multiply, which then causes an infection. The immune system will then fight off the infection and establish antibodies, which will help recognize and fight off the same disease in the future. For this very reason, it has been important for children to be vaccinated at an early age so that they may establish those antibodies their bodies need. Vaccines act as the disease so that the body may produce antibodies, but the good thing is that it won’t cause an infection (CDC, 2017).
There are current policies that mandate vaccinations in the U.S., for example, all children are required to be up to date on their vaccines before beginning school. The problem is that there are many loopholes and exceptions to the rule, whether it’s due to religious reasons or other medical issues. Because of this, there are still many children and adults who have yet to be fully compliant with vaccine requirements
Some important statistics to note (Johns Hopkins Medicine):
· CDC estimated 2,700 new cases of hepatitis A in the U.S.
· It is estimated that in 2011, 19,000 new cases of hepatitis B and 17,000 cases of hepatitis C occurred.
· In 2012, nearly 10,000 new cases of tuberculosis were reported.
· Approximately 36,000 people per year die from influenza and pneumonia.
· 50,000 new cases of HIV infection occur annually.
· In 2012, new cases of STD’s were reported, including HPV, Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, HIV, and Syphilis.
Who is affected by this problem? Identify.
Children are mainly affected by this problem due to parents’ hesitancy for vaccinations. Although law mandates for children to be vaccinated for school enrollment, parents have the option to use exemptions to avoid having their children vaccinated. Currently, medical exemptions are allowed for medical reasons in all states, and it is estimated that one to three percent of children are excused from vaccinations because of these exemptions. Parents have continued to use reasons to avoid vaccinations, for example, the belief that the decline in vaccine-preventable diseases is due to improved health care, hygiene, and sanitation (Ventola, C. L., 2016).
Health disparities among Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites have played a huge role in terms of vaccination coverage. Studies have shown that health insurance has a direct impact on the vaccination coverage in adults, therefore, low-income families who can’t afford health insurance will most likely not get the vaccines they need. With that being said, uninsured prevalence was higher among non-Hispanic blacks (19.5%) and Hispanics (30.1%) compared with non-Hispanic whites (11.1%) (Lu, P., et al, 2015).
What has been written on the issue and policy options?
There ha.
Vaccine delivery with speed, scale and equityKelley Hodge
For current and future COVID-19 vaccine rollouts, robust delivery strategies are essential to manage the initial scarce supply and adapt to the dynamic demand for COVID-19 vaccines.
To maximize the public health benefit from vaccines, we must integrate the evidence base on how to design delivery channels that vaccinate with speed, scale and equity.
Ahmed Almousa
ECE211
Jennifer Marley
10/15/2018
Should Vaccination of Children be Mandatory?
Main Argument:
Nowadays vaccines can be termed as the most essential modern medical prevention
procedure that tends to save hundred millions of lives around the globe. They have also led to the
complete eradication of viral diseases. In various under develop countries due to improper
distribution of vaccinations a large number of children lose their lives. As a research done by Bill
and Melinda Gates reveals that “; one child dies every 20 seconds from vaccine preventable
diseases,” [1]. Hence vaccines should be mandatory because it is safe, cost effective, and do not
cause side effects for healthy people, but may cause side effects for people with health
conditions.
Though in various countries where effective vaccines are willingly available, some of the
parents reject to vaccinate their kids. For example, up to 5% of parents in the UK and 9% in the
United States refuse to allow their children to be vaccinated with the measles, mumps, and
rubella (MMR) vaccine. [1] Consequently, on the off chance that you take a gander at a few US
episodes of measles or mumps - which something like 90% of the populace has been inoculated
against since 2000 - the general population who become ill are normally the individuals who
have not been vaccinated. In any case, even a few people who have been inoculated have turned
out to be wiped out amid a flare-up [1]. Even some who received the vaccination got the
diseases. The 2014 measles outbreak in the United States, and the 2015 death of a German
Ahmed
Pencil
Ahmed
Pencil
toddler from measles during an outbreak in Europe. [3], have proved the importance of vaccines
and they should be mandatory to reduce these sort of viral diseases.
Sub-argument 1: Vaccines are safe and should be mandatory.
The United States' established a vaccine safety system that ensures the vaccines are safe. In
fact, now, the United States comprises the safest, and the most operative vaccine supply in
history. The monitoring of vaccines starts with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The organization guarantees the effectiveness, safety, and accessibility of vaccines for the whole
country. Before a vaccine is approved by the FDA for use by the public it is also tested via
various approaches by scientists and doctors [2].
Sub-argument 2: Vaccines are also cost effective.
Moreover, Vaccines are also cost effective, they not only save lives of people, they save
money too. As it is more economical to prevent an ailment than to treat it. There are many
programs operating by the government to provide the public with childhood immunization as it
saves about 29.9 million dollars which are spent by people in treating these sort of diseases in a
whole year [3].
Sub-argument 3: Vaccinations caused an intense decline in the number of diseases caused by
viral .
Can-innovative-market-research-enhance-drug-launch-campaigns.pdfNewristics USA
Newristics is the first company to provide market research & message optimization services based on behavioral science & artificial intelligence. Our AI models are trained on more than 660 known heuristics.
the-impact-of-social-media-on-mental-health.pdfNewristics USA
This whitepaper explores the decision heuristics that lead to completely irrational user behaviors, pertaining to the consumption and internalization of social media and its constant barrage of perfectly filtered photos, exaggerated lifestyles, and skewed validations.
Running head UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docxjoellemurphey
Running head: UNIT 8 PROJECT
1
UNIT 8 PROJECT
2
Unit 8 Project
Name
Community Health Assessment
Affiliated University
April 02, 2015
Abstract
This project is designed to give a bigger picture of the information so far covered in this course unit. It will provide information from project four which was about social behavior theories and its roots and unit six that concerned about Influenza vaccination in senior citizens 65 and over. It will also give some information from project two which was about the role of assessment in public health. Information about child obesity as a health problem in my community will be provided, and a detailed description of how data will be provided for this health problem assessment. A completed health assessment information using a U.S Census on my community and the evaluation of this information, and the information about who may be affected by this child obesity health evaluation and a plan of action, conclusion and a reference page where information was gathered.
Unit 8 Project
U.S Census data on my County in the State of Maryland
Montgomery County is where I live, located in the state of Maryland. Its population as of 2013 was estimated to be 1,016,677 according to (United States Census Bureau), with a racial breakdown of 62.6% white alone, 18.6% Black and African American alone,0.7% American Indian and Alaskan Natives alone, Asians 14.9%,Native Hawaiian and pacific Islanders 0.1%,Two or more races 3.1%,Hispanic and Latino 18.3%.Those who are not Latinos or Hispanic comprise of 47.0% .Female persons comprise of 51.8% and no information was provided about male. Senior citizens sixty five years and over take up 13.3% .Information for people who are disabled was not provided where as children under five years take up a 6.5% and those under 18 years comprised of 23.6%. (United States Census Bureau)
Influenza Vaccination Health Assessment from Unit 6
Influenza is a deadly virus that attacks the nose, throat and lungs and it can be spread from one person to another if a sick person sneezes or coughs without covering their mouth and the other person inhales it. In United States alone, Influenza is estimated to be responsible for 36,000 deaths, and 110,000 to 200,000 hospitalizations ("Influenza vaccination," 2003). It is a virus that is prevented mainly through immunization. The world at large and the U.S government in particular, has tried their level best to conduct public health campaigns that encourage influenza vaccination but despite all the effort, a number of people do not turn up due to varied reasons. In such helpless situations an assessment can be carried out to help health care advocates find out factors affecting vaccine commitment. A good example of this is from county of Los Angeles where immunization was carried out to people who are 65 and over noted to be one of those at high risk but to their surprise a few categories of people didn’t turn up for immunization. Results from Los Angeles Cou ...
Women, the Black community and Gen Z are the three groups most likely to resist receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, according to a recent study conducted by LevLane Inc. and MarketVision Research, Inc.
The study of 471 adults was conducted to gain insight into which groups are most resistant to the vaccine, why they are wary, and what can be done to overcome their worries.
The research found that more than a quarter of participants are resistant to receiving the vaccination citing concerns around medical privacy, levels of confusion and unfavorable reviews of the rollout. Nearly half of the women surveyed, 48%, said they would not receive the vaccine if it were offered to them today, with 30% of men who would also refuse.
The study also identified the reasons for the hesitancy, with 51% of participants saying the vaccines were developed too quickly, and 47% being unsure of side effects.
the graying of america challenges and controversies spring 20.docxoreo10
the graying of america: challenges and controversies spring 2012 17
Can Health Care
Rationing Ever
Be Rational?
David A. Gruenewald
Case Study
Mr. M. was a 77-year-old decisionally incapacitated
long-term nursing home resident with chronic schizo-
phrenia who was admitted to the hospital with a
bacterial pneumonia. His past medical history was
notable for deteriorating functional status over the
past 2-3 years, urinary retention requiring chronic
indwelling bladder catheterization, and two recent
hospitalizations for urinary tract infections leading
to sepsis. He developed respiratory failure soon after
admission and was intubated and placed on mechani-
cal ventilation. Follow-up studies suggested worsen-
ing pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syn-
drome (ARDS), as well as worsening kidney function.
The patient was unable to participate in any decision
making. His guardian requested that cardiopulmo-
nary resuscitation and all other intensive care be pro-
vided if necessary, including dialysis should Mr. M.’s
kidney failure continue to worsen. After five days of
mechanical ventilation, the patient was weaned from
the ventilator and extubated. The palliative care ser-
vice was consulted following the extubation; his criti-
cal care team questioned whether it would be appro-
priate to re-intubate the patient if he again developed
respiratory failure. The palliative care team contacted
Mr. M.’s brother, his only living relative, who felt the
patient’s quality of life was poor and believed the
patient would not want aggressive medical care. The
staff at his nursing home was contacted, as well as
the patient’s mental health case manager, who had all
known Mr. M. for many years. All concurred with his
brother’s assessment. Additionally, the nursing home
staff said that Mr. M. would not be able to return there
if the plan was to continue more intensive medical
management of his worsening health conditions. Hos-
pice care was discussed with these parties, and it was
thought that choosing hospice would best represent
the patient’s wishes under the circumstances. The pal-
liative care team contacted his guardian and explained
the patient’s medical situation and its implications
for his ongoing care (including the need for physical
restraints, loss of stable nursing home placement, and
confinement to the acute care hospital environment
for the duration of his acute illness). Based on this new
David A. Gruenewald, M.D., is an Associate Professor of
Medicine at the University of Washington School of Medi-
cine in Seattle, Washington, and the Associate Director of the
Palliative Medicine Fellowship at the University of Wash-
ington. He is the Medical Director of the Palliative Care and
Hospice Service at VA Puget Sound Health Care System in
Seattle, Washington. He received his Bachelor of Arts (B. A.)
degree from Reed College in Portland, Oregon, and his Medical
Doctor (M.D.) degree from the University of C ...
Breaking news hit early this week regarding potential problems with Johnson & Johnson’s one-shot COVID vaccine, causing the FDA and the CDC to recommend pausing the administration of the vaccine until further investigation can be completed. On top of canceled or rescheduled vaccine appointments, this news left many people wondering what this means for the overall vaccine administration efforts and what changes they could expect to see...
In this webinar, Dr. Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the CDC, and Charysse Nunez, insights lead for the Ad Council’s COVID Campaign, provided updates on the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations, and communications efforts. This webinar was put on by the Public Health Communications Collaborative.
1. Coalition ProposalVaccination Policy for Infectious Disease P.docxmonicafrancis71118
1. Coalition Proposal
Vaccination Policy for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control
Scope of the Problem
Vaccines have done an excellent job at preventing many diseases, some of which can be deadly if not prevented. When bacteria or viruses enter the body, they immediately begin to attack and multiply, which then causes an infection. The immune system will then fight off the infection and establish antibodies, which will help recognize and fight off the same disease in the future. For this very reason, it has been important for children to be vaccinated at an early age so that they may establish those antibodies their bodies need. Vaccines act as the disease so that the body may produce antibodies, but the good thing is that it won’t cause an infection (CDC, 2017).
There are current policies that mandate vaccinations in the U.S., for example, all children are required to be up to date on their vaccines before beginning school. The problem is that there are many loopholes and exceptions to the rule, whether it’s due to religious reasons or other medical issues. Because of this, there are still many children and adults who have yet to be fully compliant with vaccine requirements
Some important statistics to note (Johns Hopkins Medicine):
· CDC estimated 2,700 new cases of hepatitis A in the U.S.
· It is estimated that in 2011, 19,000 new cases of hepatitis B and 17,000 cases of hepatitis C occurred.
· In 2012, nearly 10,000 new cases of tuberculosis were reported.
· Approximately 36,000 people per year die from influenza and pneumonia.
· 50,000 new cases of HIV infection occur annually.
· In 2012, new cases of STD’s were reported, including HPV, Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, HIV, and Syphilis.
Who is affected by this problem? Identify.
Children are mainly affected by this problem due to parents’ hesitancy for vaccinations. Although law mandates for children to be vaccinated for school enrollment, parents have the option to use exemptions to avoid having their children vaccinated. Currently, medical exemptions are allowed for medical reasons in all states, and it is estimated that one to three percent of children are excused from vaccinations because of these exemptions. Parents have continued to use reasons to avoid vaccinations, for example, the belief that the decline in vaccine-preventable diseases is due to improved health care, hygiene, and sanitation (Ventola, C. L., 2016).
Health disparities among Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites have played a huge role in terms of vaccination coverage. Studies have shown that health insurance has a direct impact on the vaccination coverage in adults, therefore, low-income families who can’t afford health insurance will most likely not get the vaccines they need. With that being said, uninsured prevalence was higher among non-Hispanic blacks (19.5%) and Hispanics (30.1%) compared with non-Hispanic whites (11.1%) (Lu, P., et al, 2015).
What has been written on the issue and policy options?
There ha.
Vaccine delivery with speed, scale and equityKelley Hodge
For current and future COVID-19 vaccine rollouts, robust delivery strategies are essential to manage the initial scarce supply and adapt to the dynamic demand for COVID-19 vaccines.
To maximize the public health benefit from vaccines, we must integrate the evidence base on how to design delivery channels that vaccinate with speed, scale and equity.
Ahmed Almousa
ECE211
Jennifer Marley
10/15/2018
Should Vaccination of Children be Mandatory?
Main Argument:
Nowadays vaccines can be termed as the most essential modern medical prevention
procedure that tends to save hundred millions of lives around the globe. They have also led to the
complete eradication of viral diseases. In various under develop countries due to improper
distribution of vaccinations a large number of children lose their lives. As a research done by Bill
and Melinda Gates reveals that “; one child dies every 20 seconds from vaccine preventable
diseases,” [1]. Hence vaccines should be mandatory because it is safe, cost effective, and do not
cause side effects for healthy people, but may cause side effects for people with health
conditions.
Though in various countries where effective vaccines are willingly available, some of the
parents reject to vaccinate their kids. For example, up to 5% of parents in the UK and 9% in the
United States refuse to allow their children to be vaccinated with the measles, mumps, and
rubella (MMR) vaccine. [1] Consequently, on the off chance that you take a gander at a few US
episodes of measles or mumps - which something like 90% of the populace has been inoculated
against since 2000 - the general population who become ill are normally the individuals who
have not been vaccinated. In any case, even a few people who have been inoculated have turned
out to be wiped out amid a flare-up [1]. Even some who received the vaccination got the
diseases. The 2014 measles outbreak in the United States, and the 2015 death of a German
Ahmed
Pencil
Ahmed
Pencil
toddler from measles during an outbreak in Europe. [3], have proved the importance of vaccines
and they should be mandatory to reduce these sort of viral diseases.
Sub-argument 1: Vaccines are safe and should be mandatory.
The United States' established a vaccine safety system that ensures the vaccines are safe. In
fact, now, the United States comprises the safest, and the most operative vaccine supply in
history. The monitoring of vaccines starts with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The organization guarantees the effectiveness, safety, and accessibility of vaccines for the whole
country. Before a vaccine is approved by the FDA for use by the public it is also tested via
various approaches by scientists and doctors [2].
Sub-argument 2: Vaccines are also cost effective.
Moreover, Vaccines are also cost effective, they not only save lives of people, they save
money too. As it is more economical to prevent an ailment than to treat it. There are many
programs operating by the government to provide the public with childhood immunization as it
saves about 29.9 million dollars which are spent by people in treating these sort of diseases in a
whole year [3].
Sub-argument 3: Vaccinations caused an intense decline in the number of diseases caused by
viral .
Similar to exploring-covid-vaccine-psychology.pdf (20)
Can-innovative-market-research-enhance-drug-launch-campaigns.pdfNewristics USA
Newristics is the first company to provide market research & message optimization services based on behavioral science & artificial intelligence. Our AI models are trained on more than 660 known heuristics.
the-impact-of-social-media-on-mental-health.pdfNewristics USA
This whitepaper explores the decision heuristics that lead to completely irrational user behaviors, pertaining to the consumption and internalization of social media and its constant barrage of perfectly filtered photos, exaggerated lifestyles, and skewed validations.
understanding-Opioid-Crisis-using-decision-heuristics-science.pdfNewristics USA
This paper explores the Opioid Epidemic in an entirely new light. It puts the spotlight on a string of human decisions that triggered major market-shaping events that ultimately led to the Opioid Crisis in America.
How-did-medical-errors-becaome-the-cause-of-death-in-the-us.pdfNewristics USA
It's scary to think that your Healthcare may kill you. But that indeed is the unfortunate truth for tens of thousands of Americans, whose deaths are direct results of medical errors. While the issue is multi-faceted and involves several stakeholders, mitigating medical errors requires a closer look at the behavioral drivers involved.
transforming-message-testing-in-pharmaceutical-research.pdfNewristics USA
Market research has seen tremendous innovation in the past decade, but research techniques used for MESSAGE TESTING have not changed in a long time. It’s time message testing research got an upgrade.
In early 2020, when the novel coronavirus began to spread around the world, it became increasingly clear that the most effective way to combat the raging pandemic would be for the majority of the population to develop immunity — whether through natural infection or vaccination. After months of tireless effort, now that the vaccine has become a reality, we still find people hesitant to vaccinate.
can-ai-be-used-to-refresh-messaging-more-efficiently-for-pharma-brands.pdfNewristics USA
With the Pharma industry rapidly evolving, brand teams are realizing the need for more frequent message refreshes to stay ahead. But often marketing teams don’t have new clinical data or even customer insights to execute a message refresh. If you have nothing new to say, can you really say it differently enough to make a difference?
social_media_impact_on_mental_health_new01.pdfNewristics USA
Newristics is the first company to provide market research & message optimization services based on behavioral science & artificial intelligence. Our AI models are trained on more than 660 known heuristics.
Newristics is the first company to provide market research & message optimization services based on behavioral science & artificial intelligence. Our AI models are trained on more than 660 known heuristics.
Newristics is the first company to provide market research & message optimization services based on behavioral science & artificial intelligence. Our AI models are trained on more than 660 known heuristics.
a-futuristic-approach-to-message-testing-for-pharma-companies.pdfNewristics USA
Newristics is the first company to provide market research & message optimization services based on behavioral science & artificial intelligence. Our AI models are trained on more than 660 known heuristics.
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
Anti ulcer drugs and their Advance pharmacology ||
Anti-ulcer drugs are medications used to prevent and treat ulcers in the stomach and upper part of the small intestine (duodenal ulcers). These ulcers are often caused by an imbalance between stomach acid and the mucosal lining, which protects the stomach lining.
||Scope: Overview of various classes of anti-ulcer drugs, their mechanisms of action, indications, side effects, and clinical considerations.
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum ProgramLevi Shapiro
June 20, 2024, Prix Galien International and Jerusalem Ethics Forum in ROME. Detailed agenda including panels:
- ADVANCES IN CARDIOLOGY: A NEW PARADIGM IS COMING
- WOMEN’S HEALTH: FERTILITY PRESERVATION
- WHAT’S NEW IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS,
ONCOLOGICAL AND INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISEASES?
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ETHICS
- GENE THERAPY
- BEYOND BORDERS: GLOBAL INITIATIVES FOR DEMOCRATIZING LIFE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROMOTING ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE
- ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN LIFE SCIENCES
- Prix Galien International Awards Ceremony
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar leads (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Saeid Safari
Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists like Ozempic and Semiglutide
ASA GUIDELINE
NYSORA Guideline
2 Case Reports of Gastric Ultrasound
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...
exploring-covid-vaccine-psychology.pdf
1.
2. 2
Executive
summary
The US did not handle the COVID pandemic like an
advanced nation is expected to, and there were more
than 31 million cases and 580,000 deaths in the US as
of April 16, 2021. The US pharmaceutical industry did,
however, outperform the world in commercializing
vaccines for COVID at warp speed.
With 3 vaccines already approved in the US, and
several others in clinical testing or waiting approval,
the US is in a position to return to normalcy if it can
achieve a high vaccination rate and do it quickly.
Vaccination should be a no-brainer for all Americans
because it presents the most efficient way of returning
to normalcy in 2021. Almost all the vaccine trials
showed 100% protection against severe disease,
hospitalization and death resulting from COVID. A
significant reduction in all 3 metrics would give public
health officials confidence to lift restrictions even if the
number of cases keep going up.
As of April 16, 2021, less than 25% of Americans had
been fully vaccinated. While the vaccination program
has picked up momentum recently and vaccine supply
is about to expand significantly in coming weeks, there
is still a sizable population of Americans who are not
ready to accept a COVID vaccine quite yet.
Getting America vaccinated is as much a behavioral
challenge as it is a logistical challenge. In this special
report, we present a comprehensive set of
recommendations to use behavioral science to drive
NEAR UNIVERSAL vaccination in the US.
The report starts with a thoughtful analysis of barriers
to universal vaccinations, as explained by behavioral
science principles. Each barrier is explained using
specific decision heuristics and biases that are likely to
drive consumer decisions on vaccination.
The Special Report outlines specific recommendations on how
to change behavior:
Strategies for public
health
organizations to
change citizen
behaviors using
behavioral science
based incentives,
messaging and
nudge
interventions.
Strategies to
convince the last
10-20% of the most
vaccine hesitant
citizens who won't
respond to
incentives or
messaging.
Strategies for
employers to
change employee
behaviors using
behavioral science
based employee
programs.
6. 6
Why taking the COVID vaccine should be a no-brainer
As of April 16, 2021, 2.9 million people have died from COVID-19 worldwide,
with the US accounting for almost 580,000 deaths. That’s 20% of all reported
deaths worldwide even when the United States’ population is just 4.5% of the
world’s total population.
Almost 10 million Americans are still out of work and major sectors of the economy are still operating in a
limited capacity. The US has, however, led the world in development and commercialization of COVID
vaccines. The shortest path to getting America back to normal, is to reduce hospitalizations and deaths
from COVID down to flu levels, with the vaccines showing near perfect efficacy in reducing severe disease
and hospitalizations.
Getting the United States vaccinated should be a no-brainer, but less than 25% of Americans had been
fully vaccinated as of April 16, 2021.
Vaccines are very effective in reducing
covid infections.
Since the primary endpoints in most COVID vaccine trials were not
based on transmission of the disease, the FDA has not allowed claims
about transmission to be in the label for most vaccines. However,
follow-up data from trials and even real world evidence from countries
like Israel shows that vaccines reduced transmission by 65%-95%.
1
Getting vaccinated
reduces hospitalization
to almost zero.
Even a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine
can reduce hospitalization among the
elderly by 80%. If the United States
turbocharges its vaccine drive to get
maximum people vaccinated, COVID
related hospitalizations could drop to
virtually nearly zero. For example, Israel
has started returning to normal because
real-world data shows the Pfizer
vaccine has already reduced deaths
and hospitalization by 95.8%.
A difficult part of 2020 was the lack of
available ventilators for those who
needed them. Having access to one
became a matter of life and death for
many. Fortunately, data from Israel
showed that the vaccine reduced the
severity of the disease so much, that
the number of patients over 70 who
needed a ventilator dropped by 67% by
February 2021. This means that
ventilators would be available for all
those who need them, if only people just
take the vaccine. Getting jabbed is a
sure-shot way to ensure no one has to
suffer due to limited medical resources.
2
3
A drop in hospitalization means the country
could return to normal.
Lockdowns aim to flatten the curve by slowing down the spread of the
disease. They make sure that hospitals are not overwhelmed by an
influx of more daily cases than they can handle. Another goal of a
lockdown is to ensure that stakeholders have enough time to mobilize
resources as the pandemic progresses. Speeding up the vaccination
process would reduce hospitalizations dramatically. And when they stay
low, public health experts are able to lift curfews and lockdowns and
allow people to resume normal social mobility and economic activity.
Therefore a low hospitalization rate is the key to getting the United
States back to normal functioning.
7. 7
Why are Americans not motivated to take the vaccine?
In a Pew Research Center survey between Sept
8-13 (6 months after WHO declared a pandemic),
about 50% of Americans in a 10,000+ nationally
representative sample said they would either
definitely or probably get the vaccine if it were
available. That also means 50% said they would
definitely or probably not get the Vaccine. 21%
said they would definitely get it, and 24% said they
definitely wouldn’t get it. Among those who were
definitely or probably interested in getting the
vaccine, most of them would be demotivated if the
vaccine costs too much, shows many side effects,
or has low effectiveness.
One study on a sample of 1971 Americans from
July 2020 found that political characteristics and
vaccine attributes affected American’s hypothetical
motivation to get the vaccine. For example, the
probability of getting the vaccine increased by 20%
when the hypothetical vaccine’s efficacy increased
from 50% to 90%. Today, we know that vaccines
are over 90% efficacious in preventing symptomatic
COVID-19 after 2 doses.
Fortunately, Americans are trending toward
reduced hesitancy as vaccinations ramp up. Only
17% (as opposed to 50% 6 months ago) probably
or definitely won’t get vaccinated, according to a
survey done on 80,000 people early in March 2021.
In summary, a lack of knowledge about
vaccinations and concerns about side effects
were the main reasons people were less
motivated to take a vaccine, but hesitancy
is going down.
Current state of COVID vaccination in the US must improve
The US has been a market leader in vaccine
development, but it is falling short when it comes to
COVID-19 immunization. While the current state is not
terrible considering the size of the country, it can definitely
be improved. As of April 16, 2021, Israel has delivered
116 doses per 100 people, with 56% of its population fully
vaccinated. The US has delivered 59 doses per 100
people, with 24% of the population being fully vaccinated.
U.A.E, Chile, and U.K, among a few others, are ahead of
the US. At the same time, 78% of the vaccine supply has
been used up, with most states in the 70%-85% range.
This means that states are prepared with enough doses
to have a higher vaccination rate in the US than they
do currently.
The vaccine is already successful in the
US and showing trends of higher success
as the months go by. A single dose of the
Pfizer and Moderna Vaccine can prevent
hospitalization. Over 9% of Americans
received at least a single dose between
February and March 2021, a vast
undertaking. The US had nearly 130,000
COVID patients in hospitals on Jan 6, 2021.
Fast forward two months later and that
number has reduced by 70%. Vaccine uptake
has driven hospitalization numbers down and
will continue to do so at an exponential rate.
Considering that the vaccine is incredibly
successful and the United States is prepared
to handle higher vaccine uptake, Americans
should get vaccinated faster than they
currently are.
9. 9
Barrier # 1
Ambiguity surrounding the vaccine
People don’t know how to choose
between vaccines.
1. Most people have never had to evaluate and choose from a variety of
vaccine technologies, like mRNA vaccines, peptide vaccines, etc.
2. Historically, people didn’t have to pay attention to the “efficacy” of a vaccine,
and definitely didn’t have to compare the efficacy of multiple vaccines. Now
some who have a choice are forced into such decisions and could face
many unknowns that threaten to paralyze decision making.
People don’t know where, when, and how
to get vaccinated.
1. People are not yet clear on where and when they should get vaccinated.
2. Many don’t know where to search for relevant information that pertains to
their specific case.
People don’t know how to overcome common
problems while getting vaccinated.
1. People don’t have ready solutions to the most common logistical problems
like large travel distances and mobilizing priority groups.
2. People don’t know how to secure their vaccines and book appointments.
Solution 1
Make relevant information available
in digital and non-digital forms to
tap into the Availability Heuristic.
These problems above arise due to a lack of awareness
and improper information targeting. When the right
information isn’t present in one’s awareness frequently,
it’s likely to become a barrier to getting vaccinated.
Availability Heuristic can be deployed to overcome these
barriers. This heuristic is all about making information
available to our collective awareness, since we tend to
base decisions on what is readily available to us.
Solution 2
Develop trust in authorities to trigger
Attribute Substitution and Authority Bias.
The volume of decisions a person has to make to get vaccinated
may seem overwhelming, but they can rely on authorities to simplify
decision-making. People subconsciously use attribute substitution,
which is a tendency to substitute a complex decision space with a
simpler one. Instead of burdening people with heavy information and
expecting them to go through a tedious decision-making process,
authorities, influencers, and experts can make recommendations for
the general public to follow. To enable this solution, it is vital to build
trust between authorities and the general population.
10. 10
Barrier # 2
Some people don’t want to take the vaccine immediately and want
to play the wait and watch game.
In a poll conducted in January 2021 with 1563 American adults, 41% wanted to get the vaccine as soon as
possible. 31% wanted to wait and observe how vaccinations work out before deciding whether or not to opt
for it. Only 13% had no intention of getting vaccinated. Waiting and watching puts people at the risk of
home quarantining for 10 days or spending days in a hospital - a stressful, undesirable period for
most people.
But why do some people hesitate when the vaccine has proven to be so effective?
Vaccine skepticism: : People have a global tendency to be skeptical of
something new and unknown. They resist change. They demonstrate Ambiguity
Aversion, which describes our tendency to avoid those options which have an
unknown likelihood of positive outcomes. Skepticism, manifesting as anti-
vaccination attitudes due to conspiracy or misinformation, is related to poor
scientific thinking skills. Helping the public look through a scientific lens could
help reduce skepticism.
Healthcare distrust: The intention to get vaccinated is much lesser among
marginalized groups like Black Americans and Hispanic Americans when
compared to white Americans. One reason for this is a deep-seated distrust in
the healthcare system (and authority), which has demonstrated systemic racism
and prejudice. This has created a Negative Halo Effect, where marginalized
groups infer that authorities don’t have their best interests in mind.
Mental inertia: Over a year has gone by since people began adjusting to the
“new normal”, in which our best defense has been a lockdown, social distancing,
mask-wearing, and regular sanitizing. These new habits and adjustments took
time and effort to feel normal. Now, people are inclined to feel a sense of stability,
and one way they do this is by resisting any form of change to keep things the
way they were in 2020 (i.e., maintain their status quo). That’s the Status Quo
Bias that makes people resist change, even if the change is good - like preparing
to get vaccinated to be able to return to normal.
11. 11
Safety concerns: Misinformation about the vaccine, despite the demonstrated
success, plays into our negative biases and causes concern. Skeptics might
believe misinformation easily, if it confirms their skepticism. Humans also exhibit
the Neglect of Probability Bias, which is our tendency to selectively overvalue
rare events and fail to compare their likelihood with the most typical events. This
makes some people believe that the highly improbable worst-case scenarios like
bad side effects, vaccine failure, and allergies are likely to happen to them.
People may jump to conclusions, with an emotional reaction to unlikely events.
Research corroborates the idea that jumping to conclusions is related to irrational
beliefs, understanding probability, and impaired decision-making.
Focusing on a singular undesirable case of a bad allergic reaction could induce
Dread Risk. It describes people’s tendency to let their fears of extreme
catastrophic events guide their decisions to avoid even the remotest possibility of
such events coming to pass. Dread risk may be fuelled by Availability Heuristic,
which is readily available extreme examples from the news or the internet that
fuel this dread.
Pfizer, for example, is already testing if their vaccine is useful against new sars-
cov-2 variants, although there is no evidence to suggest that the vaccine is
ineffective against new strains. Such examples are essential to foster trust and
the sense that authorities are preparing well to ensure worst-case-scenarios don’t
play out.
Solution 1
Highlight the probability of success.
Influencers, authorities, and news reporters should
emphatically focus on the vaccine’s success instead of the
unlikely scenario of getting mild side-effects or re-infection.
People tend to value loss more than equivalent gains, so they
try to avoid the side-effects (loss) more than seeking
immunity (gain). They may be incorrectly overvaluing the loss
they are trying to prevent because adverse outcomes from
getting vaccinated are virtually non-existent.
Solution 2
Improve trust between authorities
and the public.
Addressing vaccine skepticism, healthcare distrust, and
safety concerns will most likely reduce the frequency of
people who want to “wait and see how things turn out.” Media
can help counter the over-representation of negative stories
that show a breach of trust or unwarranted skepticism, so as
to not negatively influence people. We need to avoid the
Negativity Bias, wherein negative stories have a stronger
impact than positive stories of equal intensity.
12. 12
Barrier # 3
Some people don’t think they need a vaccine.
There are 3 common reasons why someone would conclude they don’t need a vaccine:
Overconfidence
People have irrational beliefs like, “My immunity is better than others” or “I am extra safe.” This
overconfidence is based on inherent biases. Optimism bias tells us that 80% of people think good
things will happen to them while they can miraculously avoid bad things. The better-than-average
effect tells us that people rate themselves better than most other people on various traits, even ones like
immunity and safety adherence.
Alternative medicine
Some people are likely to adopt strictly alternative medical routes with the confidence that they are
already in control. Their alternative medical choices create an illusion of control that makes them feel
safe and secure.
Perceived immunity
Lack of existing symptoms in some people could falsely feed the notion that they are healthy. Some may
even presume that they’ve already been exposed and developed immunity. While this immunity could
last for a few months, it is not as good an option as getting vaccinated. When people believe they are
healthy, they will seek-out evidence to support that notion, which is their confirmation bias at work. In
this case however, the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, so perceived immunity doesn’t
indicate actual immunity.
1
2
3
Solution 1
Acknowledge people’s reasons and offer compatible reasoning to encourage
vaccines.
People may show an escalation of commitment bias while defending their position of not getting vaccinated. The bias is our tendency
to commit to a prior decision hoping that this additional investment will lead to a successful outcome. This may simply offer an illusion
of control. However, multiple “appeals” can be made to counter this resistance by doing the following:
• Highlight what getting vaccinated is a non-zero-sum game where each vaccinated person technically reduces the chances of other people getting
COVID-19.
• Appeal to social proof to show what the majority is choosing to get vaccinated.
• Indicate that it's an altruistic act to get vaccinated to prevent the less fortunate from getting infected.
• Appeal to the egocentric bias, where people tend to take more credit for their group’s positive outcome by telling them their decision to get vaccinated
is responsible for their group’s improved health.
Solution 2
Don’t counter people’s self-beliefs and faith in alternative medicine; position their
beliefs as a psychological “booster” instead.
Status quo bias suggests that people may seek alternative medicine and hold on to irrational beliefs to feel in control and stick to their
current way of life and thinking. Marketers and medical staff can reassure them how their beliefs can have additional positive effects
on top of the vaccine’s effects, because positive psychological states improve immunity and ability to cope. Show how the combined
effects can achieve their personal goal of staying healthy.
13. 13
Barrier # 4
Some people want to get the vaccine but have immediate,
practical concerns.
2 practical barriers could create problems in taking a vaccine dose.
Not enough time or money
Although governments are trying to keep the cost of an
individual vaccine low, many people have lost a reliable
revenue stream. Many are living paycheck to paycheck to
even put food on the table. Losing 1 or 2 day’s revenue to
get vaccinated may not be a luxury everyone can afford.
No means to physically get the vaccine
A lack of transport, inappropriate timings, and unavailable
childcare options are common logistical barriers people may
face. Even if the motivation to get vaccinated is high, these
barriers may create an unnecessary delay.
Solution 1
Let authorities recommend a majority of vaccine-related decisions, so people don’t
have the burden of decision-making.
People can rely on Attribute substitution, which occurs when we unconsciously substitute a complex, difficult judgment (or attribute)
with an easier one. Instead of expecting people to overcome these barriers themselves, stakeholders can employ familiar or
authoritative people to announce answers to common questions, via live-streamed FAQs or viral posts on social media. Then people
don’t have to take the burden of solving their problems and can base their decisions on what authorities suggest.
• If logistics are a problem, a neighborhood helpline or a friendly chat bot can give easy-to-follow instructions.
• If timing is a problem, allow flexible timings for a person to commit to a vaccine appointment. Avoid penalizing people for missing or rescheduling
appointments. The system should ideally make the process as easy as possible.
If people have to make too many decisions, they may show Choice Overload, or our tendency to become indecisive when presented
with too many options or details. Authorities need to circumvent this by simplifying the process.
Solution 2
Make specific, targeted information
available.
People tend to rely on the most available information to make
their decisions. The availability of information or Availability
Heuristic is commonly used to solve one’s problems and make
appropriate evaluations. Focus on the specifics of solutions
that people can relate to, so that they can latch-on to the most
relevant information.
Solution 3
Create flexible access to getting
vaccinated.
Clinics can offer time-based flexibility along with monetary
flexibility. This can be done by offering a vaccine that can be
paid off in the future. Another possibility is to provide paid
leave to get vaccinated. Such flexibility will make it easier for
those who have daily commitments that are hard to readjust.
14. 14
Barrier # 5
Some people don’t think the risk/reward balance of the vaccine
justifies taking it.
There is poor communication about the vaccine’s
efficacy and some people are questioning the
risk/reward trade off of taking the vaccine. According
to Dr. Cevik, public communication about the vaccine
has been inadequate and possibly misleading.
One major problem is that people tend to focus a lot
on possibilities and not probabilities. For example,
people have strong emotional reactions to the highly
unlikely possibility of getting infected in the future
despite vaccinating.
People demonstrate a cognitive bias called the
Neglect of Probability - a tendency to neglect the
probability of an event happening. Even if the
probability is very low, our attention overvalues it and
fixates on the low probability as if it were high
probability. For example, the Pfizer vaccine reduces
the chance of getting COVID-19 by over 95%. Yet,
people mistakenly believe that there is a good chance
that the vaccine is useless just because it is not a
100% chance of avoiding the disease.
Base Rate Fallacy creates more complications. Some people may
fixate on individual cases where a vaccine gave a severe allergic
reaction, but they may neglect the rate at which such an event
occurs. The base rate fallacy occurs when people ignore the actual
likelihood of something happening and focus on a single case that
misrepresents the most likely scenario.
In addition to this, people also experience the Ambiguity
Aversion, which is our tendency to reject options where the
probability of something good happening is unknown. If we don’t
know the probability of developing immunity with the vaccine, we
may refuse the vaccine simply because the probability is unknown.
However, unknown doesn’t mean the vaccine is harmful. Current
research shows the vaccine is highly effective in combating
COVID-19.
Neglect of probability, base rate fallacy, and the Ambiguity effect
may fuel skepticism that is not based on conspiracy theories but is
a flawed interpretation of probabilities. Collectively, they induce
dread risk, which describes people’s tendency to let their fears of
extreme catastrophic events guide their decisions to avoid the
remotest possibility of such events coming to pass.
Countering this requires helping people assess probabilities and not possibilities. Overcoming two biases can
help us achieve that.
Certainty illusion:
Humans have an overvalued desire for
100% confidence or certainty. People
incorrectly expect that the vaccine is a
sure-shot way to stay safe from
COVID-19.
Certainty effect:
Humans value certainty and are more
displeased if the probability of a sure
thing, rather than an uncertainty,
decreases. If people think about vaccines
as a 100% savior, learning it is 95%
effective can be disheartening.
Solution
Help people assess the probabilities
better without getting stuck about
possibilities. Overanalyzing unlikely
scenarios can reduce vaccine
uptake, so stakeholders should
primarily focus on likely/typical
scenarios.
Help those around you compare probabilities, especially when
they are close to 1 or 0. For example, a probability of 0.5 is a
50-50 chance, but a probability of 0.01 is a 1 in 100 chance.
Help others realize that most scientific calculations are done
statistically, and absolute certainty rarely exists in science.
Instead of letting a possibility create fear, people should be
encouraged to take more control of their lives by dealing with
probabilities. Thinking “if I do this, my chance of getting infected
can go down” could help people regain control over their lives.
Help people control their probabilities by taking simpler actions
like ensuring better personal hygiene, staying healthy, resting
before and after vaccinating, mask-wearing, social distancing,
fewer trips to stores, etc.
Focus more on the typical outcomes, not extreme and
unlikely ones.
1
2
3
4
5
16. 16
32 ways to incentivize and nudge people
to take the vaccine
We have too many vaccines,
but not enough takers.
As of March 24, 2021, the US was facing a
surprising problem - a surplus of vaccines
because there weren't enough takers. The US’s
current trend is to widen the eligibility criteria, so
more people could book an appointment. A way to
overcome this problem is to incentivize people to
not hold back mainly because of the previously
mentioned barriers.
These incentives are likely to work best if they
occur in a critical time window that coincides with
government-mandated eligibility criteria at any
given point of time.
The goal of using incentives is 3-fold:
Effective use of the following incentives means
making incentives publicly apparent and boldly
visible - either by amplifying the incentive's value
at the start or blending them with marketing
efforts.
Motivate people to get the vaccine.
Create an atmosphere of positivity
around vaccination drives.
Show how easy it is to earn extra
privileges for a community-serving
act.
1
2
3
Direct financial Incentives
Employers can offer a paid day off to employees who wish to get the vaccine. The government offers
these employers a fund that goes toward complying with government regulations.
Homeless people can redeem free coffees and burgers if they vaccinate. These vaccinations can be
reciprocity at no/minimal costs, and homeless people can refer more like them for additional discounts.
Children's insurance can be cheaper for parents who showcase a completed, verified vaccine
passport.
Car insurance companies can provide safe driver discounts for additional health precautions such as
pro-vaccine behaviors like immunization against COVID and other diseases.
Banks can offer lowered EMI rates for large purchases, if earning members have their immediate
family fully vaccinated.
Verifying vaccination on e-wallets can let customers choose interest categories for discounts from
different retailers.
Happy hours at bars can be extended for fully vaccinated patrons.
Grocery chains could use the vaccine revenue if the vaccine is available to them. Maybe people get
X% off their grocery purchases on the day they get the vaccine in the store.
Vaccine centers can tie up with garage sales and made-in-America products at high discounts to
promote local entrepreneurs who hustle.
Banks can issue special credit cards with unique cashback offers and discount tie-ups.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
17. 17
Service add-on Incentives
Airlines and tourism stakeholders can offer significant benefits to kick-start tourism again. Frequent
flyer miles, hotel package discounts, free a la carte dinners, discounted travel insurance, etc., can
motivate people.
OTT services can upgrade their individual plans to family plans at a discount with a verified passport
instead of bundling OTTs with other less critical purchases.
Amazon and other e-commerce sites can offer extended free delivery or prime/pro memberships at
the end of the current paid cycle.
11
12
13
Reward and Recognition Incentives
Social media platforms can give a shareable badge of vaccination that can be highlighted as a post,
embed, or a photo filter. People can seed a fun, creative trend.
Create an affiliate marketing scheme where a person helping other people get vaccines can have a
token economy for benefits across various platforms.
Recognize every vaccine volunteer with a vaccine hall of fame recognition, and the top few
contributors can get featured with their favorite sports teams and get a timeless photo with them.
Digital platforms can create digital swag like vaccine-related humor, trendy emoticons, stickers, cover
photos, Snapchat filters, etc., to prime thoughts about vaccinating.
Big chain restaurants and food outlets with routine discounts can instead offer discounts to fully
vaccinated patron groups that visit the store.
Starbucks can offer free upgrades on drinks, and others can offer equivalent benefits like 2 free
donuts on a purchase of 4 for a limited period, if the paying consumer is vaccinated.
Lottery tickets can be distributed at vaccine centers, and TV/Radio lottery numbers can have extra
conditional "final" digits that increase the odds of winning but only for those who are vaccinated at the
time of watching.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Emotional Incentives
Food discount messages can be framed for emotional appeal - "Are you a giving person who loves to
help the community? Show us your vaccine passport and get 50% off on any weekday!”
Feature happy couples to model in advertisements through a lucky draw.
Encourage competition and cooperation via online forums, apps, and discord servers to help civilians
who voluntarily help with vaccine drives.
Beloved celebrities can endorse the vaccine.
Dating apps can offer a vaccination “blue tick” that allows people a more comfortable dating & hook-up
experience in a safe way.
Any vaccine promotion can appeal to people’s need for safety and security by making it salient.
21
22
23
24
25
26
18. 18
Effort-reduction Incentives
Vaccination clinics can be deployed near supermarkets, malls, and gas-stations
Vaccination clinics can give privileged access to factory and industrial workers and their families by
setting-up clinics near official locations, so it is easy for many people to overcome logistical hurdles.
Supermarkets and medical stores, via insurers, can bundle vaccine assistance with a range of
unrelated benefits like priority home deliveries and discounts on walkers, catheters, adult diapers, etc.,
to help older people ease their day-to-day difficulties.
27
28
29
Negation-of-penalty incentives
A vaccine passport can extend expiration dates for frequent flyer miles, redeemable offers from digital
wallets, and discount coupons on e-commerce sites. A blanket extension of expiry dates can be
strong enough to help people rush to get the vaccine.
Offenders eligible for community service can be granted a lenient schedule to return to their family, if
they participate in vaccine drives as community service.
Juvenile offenders can be recruited to spread digital awareness about vaccine drives and answer
FAQs on social media.
30
31
32
20. 20
Mindful Messaging:
5 strategies to deliver vaccine messages that will work
The way we present a vaccine campaign’s messaging or how someone
perceives that messaging plays a significant role in how effectively an
‘intention to get vaccinated’ converts into successfully getting vaccinated.
Framing effect: Frame messages to show success
and gains with appropriate context.
1
Framing effect describes how positive or negative wording of the same objective information can create
positive or negative emotional responses. For example, people are more likely to adopt a new medicine if 90%
of people feel better after using it, when compared to 10% not feeling better after using it. Positive framing of a
marketing or sales message can make all the difference when people are somewhat motivated, but are
second-guessing their decision. Both “frames” of the message can activate various memories or news
examples that confirm fear or hope.
From a vaccine drive point of view, positive framing of media titles, marketing messages, and sales pitches
would encourage most people to favor a vaccine.
Example strategies to frame messages
During advertisement retargeting, present
2 simultaneous frames, so people are
likely to choose one of the two even
though the outcome of both frames is the
same.
Tell people how most people can easily
manage the side effects and how
miniscule they are when compared to
the potential danger of COVID-19.
Use numbers that highlight the magnitude
of success and minimize the magnitude
of failures. Choose larger numbers
instead of smaller numbers. For example,
“a vaccine can save 98% of people from
disease symptoms” instead of “only 2%
people will show symptoms”.
Show how people can choose to help
their society, family, and friends by
vaccinating or help the coronavirus
spread by not vaccinating.
Use culturally and linguistically suitable
frames to appeal to specific
demographics.
Portray most side effects as a good
thing because they indicate that the
vaccine is successfully “training” the
immune system to fight back.
Positive framing motivates people to avoid risk, but negative framing motivates people to take a risk. Framing
would affect people’s decision to avoid the risk of infection or take the chances of getting infected. If a vaccine
message is framed poorly, people might choose to rely on other measures such as boosting immunity, following
social distance, or leaving it up to fate, instead of getting vaccinated.
21. 21
Illusion of control: Consider the vaccine as a
comprehensive pandemic response, not a savior.
2
Researchers highlight a critical message framing approach that influences attitudes toward the vaccine. They
suggest that people consider the vaccine a “comprehensive pandemic response” rather than “a savior”. This
need for control that motivates us to do activities that make us feel in control as much as possible, even if we are
overestimating our ability to influence outcomes is called Illusion of Control.
Illusion of control is helpful in 3 ways to
increase vaccine uptake:
1. People actively participate in defending against the disease.
2. People won’t blindly ignore safety protocols because a
vaccine will save them from the disease, no matter what.
3. It returns control over health to the public instead of
passively accepting uncertainty. Because having control is
a common psychological need (seeking ways to control
health outcomes), making this point salient would tap into
an already existing motivation.
We cannot consider the illusion of control as
absolute control over the pandemic, but
getting vaccinated is the best way to convert
the illusion into reality. Moreover, those who
are desperate to control the situation and help
out can channel their energy to mobilize
disadvantaged people by spreading
trustworthy information and helping those
around them as per official guidelines. This
would also provide a healthy form of illusion
of control.
Getting vaccinated empowers people to regain the control they lost in 2020.
Because people lost their sense of control during the pandemic through health, economic, and social uncertainty,
they might adopt behaviors to get control of their lives back. A golden opportunity to show how people can regain
control and stability in their life is to sell the vaccine as a means to do that. Eventually, the higher the number of
vaccinated people, the higher the control most people will have over their lives. This no longer stays as an
“illusion”; it becomes actual control.
The COVID Vaccine is
not a get-out-of-covid-
free card, but wording it
appropriately can help
people feel safer and in
control of their lives.
Not everyone will get
a vaccine on time, so
the ones who have
the opportunity should
take it as soon as
possible.
Not everyone is
medically suited to
get a vaccine, so their
loved ones can get
vaccinated to keep
them safe.
Some people will
have to rely on social
distancing and mask-
wearing more to
compensate for other
risks.
Choosing to get vaccinated also does not mean that other safety precautions should be ignored. While most can
get vaccinated, we still need to multiply its benefits by using supporting habits like social distancing, mask-
wearing, and frequent sanitation - until the whole community is deemed safe. The attitude change to accept the
vaccine as a “comprehensive pandemic response” will avoid risk compensation and cognitive dissonance.
Risk compensation in this context refers to our tendency to
increase risk-taking behavior after feeling safer. People could
take reckless actions because they are vaccinated, thinking they
are safe. Perceived immunity becomes a decision-criteria to
engage in risk-taking behavior that may lead to problems like
infecting others, catching different diseases, splurging money,
and motivating others to take risks. Wearing a mask and using
disinfectants can only help to counter risk compensation.
Cognitive dissonance is a mental state where two
conflicting thoughts and behaviors exist at the same
time. Cognitive dissonance can cause stress and a
decision-paralysis. This may happen when a person
getting vaccinated feels that the pandemic is not
receding and people are suffering. Here, getting
vaccinated and the pandemic not receding are
conflicting, incompatible thoughts.
A way to feel in control is to delay cognitive dissonance and risk compensation which can be accomplished by
wearing masks, physically distancing from others, and disinfecting after risky contact.
22. 22
The Pseudocertainty effect: Bring winning against
COVID-19 into the spotlight.
3
Vaccine messaging can also evoke the pseudocertainty effect in people. It describes how people tend
to make risk-averse choices if the expected outcome is positive but make risk-seeking choices to avoid
negative outcomes.
If people are overly worried
about side-effects, they will
choose to take the risk-
seeking choice of not
getting vaccinated.
If people focus on
avoiding COVID-19, they
will make the risk-averse
choice of getting
vaccinated.
If people are told about how they can go back
to normal with no lockdowns, go for their
social plans, hug others, and travel-they are
likely to choose the risk-averse choice of
getting vaccinated.
Although this seems obvious to most people, the information that remains in awareness would influence if they
go for a risk-seeking or risk-averse choice. A successful vaccine drive would then need to focus on minimizing
the threat of vaccine side effects and maximizing the success of avoiding COVID-19. The easiest way to do this
is to simply highlight words and images that make people visualize avoiding COVID-19.
Loss-Aversion: Make losing what you have salient, while
showing a better future.
4
A complementary way to frame vaccine messages is to make Loss-aversion salient. We tend to avoid losing
something we already have instead of getting something better or newer. People might avoid losing one’s
control, existing health, and existing stability. People also have something opposite - an Optimism Bias where
they believe good things will happen to them in the future, even when the chances of bad things happening are
50-50. To increase vaccine uptake, combine loss-aversion tendency with optimism bias.
Example:
Show people they are likely to lose
their existing stability as lockdowns
are lifted, and fewer “rules” would
exist to guide behavior. They may
have the security of staying at
home, but as people start going out,
they may lose their distance from
the coronavirus (loss-aversion).
Highlight how the vaccine can help
them stay safer in a more socially
active world (optimism).
Example:
Many people have strained
personal relationships due to weak
boundaries between work and
home life, a lack of space from a
relationship, and a lack of diversity
in activities. Losing a good
relationship can boost loss-aversion
tendencies. The faster people get
inoculated, the faster they will
regain those boundaries in a more
spaced-out world.
People often consider future regrets while making a decision. This anticipated regret can promote decisions that
avoid that regret. In the case of getting vaccinated, people may consider guilt or regret that might arise in the
future for not getting vaccinated. Showing people the cost of future regret from not vaccinating - infecting family
and friends and spending 15 days in isolation - can motivate them to avoid it. Missing the opportunity to get
vaccinated could be a major regret in the future because it delays safety and vaccines run out of stock. The
regret they anticipate is a loss in the future, and our loss-aversion tendency can counter it if stakeholders make
the anticipated regret apparent. Other losses people might want to avoid are hospital bills, instability due to
quarantining, and the psychological stress of being too anxious.
23. 23
Verbal nudging: Use specific words to make people more
receptive toward a vaccine.
5
The content of messaging can be used to nudge people to ensure they are regularly primed to think about getting
a vaccine, add emotional value to it, and simultaneously become aware of how easy it is to get immunized.
Prime the vaccine's associative memory network to activate
memory units that represent vaccine related information.
1. Talk about the vaccine without trying to sell it.
2. Talk about immunity.
3. Talk about medical advancements.
4. Talk about no one feeling sick and spreading the disease.
5. Talk about the positives and successes.
Appeal to emotions to motivate a change in behavior from
inaction to action.
1. Use rhyming words or catchphrases like "Jab the Rona" and "Vax it
to Axe it."
2. Highlight emotional rewards that people have missed - going on
vacations, hugging family members, dating, socializing, etc.
3. Messaging campaigns should include multiple languages and cultural
idiosyncrasies that appeal to a minority who feel a disconnect with the
“system.”
Access to easy information so the brain is aware of the
steps involved in vaccination process.
1. Highlight how easy it is to get the vaccine.
2. Use a standardized set of steps for vaccinating that feel easy.
3. Repeat standardized steps across digital and offline media, so the steps
feel familiar.
24. 24
RECOMMENDED NUDGE STRATEGIES
FOR PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS TO AFFECT
BEHAVIOR CHANGE
7 smart nudge strategies to enable
the general public make better
vaccination decisions
25. 25
Strategy 1:
Use the Availability Heuristic to Motivate people to vaccinate.
There are two levels of access to the vaccine that are important.
Level 1 access depends on production and logistics.
Level 2 access depends on the Availability Heuristic.
Availability Heuristic is our tendency to base judgments, predictions, and decisions on information that is
readily and currently available to us. We use available information to form a context for making future decisions.
With only 17% of Americans fully vaccinated and many showing concerns about vaccine information, we can use
Availability Heuristic to bring useful information into awareness. The decision to take a vaccine will depend on
how our Availability Heuristic aligns with reliable and trustworthy information about vaccines, vaccine drives, and
the consequences of taking a vaccine.
How Availability Heuristic can improve vaccine uptake
Stakeholders, like the general public, clinics, politicians, and insurance companies, can make attractive
campaign slogans, visuals, memes, social media campaigns, Instagram challenges, Instagram reels,
etc., to create a high level of awareness about trustworthy and responsibly worded information.
High awareness of information will most likely engage the Availability Heuristic, and people will think of
things they saw while talking to others taking a vaccine.
This background awareness creates a sense of familiarity, which will create the Mere-exposure effect
Or our preference for familiar things.
The Availability Heuristic will enable the mere-exposure effect to create a more positive attitude toward
vaccine-related information.
Strategy 2:
Use Social Proof to accelerate large-scale pro-vaccine behavior.
In a poll conducted in January 2021 with 1563 American adults, 41% wanted to get the
vaccine as soon as possible. 31% wanted to wait and observe how vaccinations work out
before they decide to opt for it and only 13% had no intention to get vaccinated. The
interesting finding here is that half of the 41% knew someone who is already vaccinated.
That is why Social Proof can be leveraged to change large-scale behavior.
Action plan for all
stakeholders to
use Social proof
to increase
vaccine uptake:
Share “getting vaccinated” stories or photos on social media.
Explicitly like, share, and comment on other similar posts. This increases the
reach of such posts on social media. Again, this will feed into the Availability
Heuristic and doubly motivate people to automatically think - “let’s get the
vaccine; everyone is getting it.”
Casually bring up the intention to vaccinate in conversations.
1
2
3
Social proof refers to the human tendency to make a decision that many people endorse. People usually do
what others are doing. In a way, watching others trust the vaccine gets more people on board. Research shows
that observing others display intrinsic motivation can intrinsically motivate the observer.
26. 26
Strategy 3:
Use FOMO to motivate people out of mental inertia.
FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) occurs when people want to do what others are doing to
avoid missing out on it. FOMO is a powerful motivation propagated via social media. For
example, encourage people to use vaccine campaign hashtags and upload photos taking
a shot, so others see it and feel FOMO.
Strategy 4:
Give options regarding the vaccine.
Humans generally don’t like being told what to do. Giving them a choice to make
regarding the cost, type of vaccine (either of the 3), time slots, family packages, referral
discount/benefits, etc., fosters a sense of control over choosing to vaccinate themselves.
The illusion of control can give people the mental satisfaction of making their choice,
preferably between 2 or more desirable choices - not 1 desirable and 1 undesirable
choice. This will be valuable in the US because some Americans want to pick and
choose their vaccine, possibly because the ability to choose is associated with equity
and autonomy.
Strategy 5:
Announce vaccines are limited in supply.
People have demonstrated hoarding behaviors during lockdowns because of the
Scarcity Heuristic - our tendency to want something more if it is limited in supply. The
same behavior can occur for vaccines when they are limited. People are likely to put in
additional effort to secure a vaccine for themselves and their families before they run out.
Strategically creating the narrative that vaccines are currently available but can quickly
get scarce would prompt people to prioritize inoculation sooner than later.
2 Ways to leverage the Scarcity Heuristic:
It was previously scarce; people had to wait for
weeks, drive for hours, and wait in queues to
get the vaccine. Now it is streamlined and can
be done quickly.
The vaccine is getting scarce because it is
highly successful, and people can’t wait to
grab the jab.
Vaccine uptake needs a push because humans have mental inertia that FOMO can overcome. People prefer to
let things be the way they are instead of adopting changes. This is the Status Quo Bias (mental inertia). When
people have adapted to work-from-home, they might want to continue doing that because that is the new normal.
Change requires active effort, and the Status Quo Bias creates a tendency to be passive and let things stay the
way they are. If people have gotten used to waiting for a vaccine, they’ll continue waiting instead of taking the first
vaccination chance they get. FOMO can encourage people to let go of their mental inertia and become actively
engaged in getting a community vaccinated. Creating hype on social media with trends, photos, status
messages, hashtags, check-ins, etc., can ignite FOMO.
27. 27
Strategy 6:
Appeal to emotions to get people to act.
Humans often use the Affect Heuristic, which describes our tendency to think based
on emotions and gut feelings instead of rationality. People also remember emotional
and personally relevant information more than non-emotional information (the
Attentional Bias). Emotions themselves become primary motivators. And, it can
turbocharge Availability Heuristic can keep the most relevant information in
awareness.
Safety: Basic psychological needs of safety, security, and freedom of movement have been threatened.
Priming people with the idea that immunization and make them feel safer in day-to-day living can trigger an
innate motivation to do anything that ensures their safety.
Humor & arousal: Apart from appealing to fear and concern, advertisers can also appeal to sexual
arousal, humor, and goofy fun to create more impressionable advertisements that stay in one’s awareness.
That informational content can inform one’s emotions, which, in turn, affect decision-making. Making people
feel better activates the Happy-People-Happy-Choices tendency where a good mood motivates positive
decisions.
Love: Another line of nudging can appeal to love and caring - “don’t you want to hug your grandma without
risking her life?” Sexually available people can be motivated to get back in the dating game by highlighting
how immunization will make intimate contact better.
Pride: Marketing stakeholders can also tap into patriotism and feelings associated with the constitution of
the United States by highlighting that Pfizer is an American company and the vaccine is developed with
American resources. This would appeal to the in-Group Bias, where people tend to prefer objects made
and endorsed by their own group members.
Altruism: Most people depend a lot on essential workers like medical staff, housekeeping employees,
drivers, and delivery agents who have no other option but to work in risky situations due to their proximity to
other people run-on. Stakeholders can highlight how getting vaccinated reduces the risk of infecting
essential workers (via reduced cough droplets) whose work we may take for granted and depend on,
especially in a crisis. If they fall ill and can’t work, everyone suffers even more.
1
2
3
4
5
Strategy 7:
Focus on the attributes of the vaccine and vaccination protocols,
not just the benefits.
When people have to choose a marketed product (like a vaccine), benefits can
usually persuade them, but characteristics/attributes can be more persuasive if it is
an immediate purchase. The words used while persuading can maximize conversion
by doing the following:
Make the vaccine’s characteristics
appealing - how efficacious it is, what
authorities are making it, how long it
takes to show effects, how easy the
process is, etc. Videos and photos can
maximize this appeal-to-attributes.
Showcase the benefits to trigger what they are
getting into and simultaneously showcase what
negative things they’ll avoid and what positive things
they’ll gain after getting vaccinated. Losses and
gains could be everything from health benefits,
insurance coverage, employee benefits, reduced
hospital dues, etc.
1 2
29. 29
Some of the key stakeholders who can drive behavior change to increase vaccine uptake are employers and
business executives. They have potential influence on 120 million employed Americans and 300 million
American patrons/consumers/clients of those employees. Based on the recommendations made by notable
doctors Kevin G. Volpp, George Loewenstein, and Alison M. Buttenheim in their opinion paper, here are 6
implementations of their ideas. These can be used by employers to get their workforce and patrons vaccinated
over and above the other recommendations made in this report. The heuristics given below are ways to amplify
the effectiveness of these recommendations.
The vaccine should be free and easily accessible
as much as possible.
1
Employers in the US can make purchases or offer bonuses for their employees and their family members.
Employers can offer discounted vaccine rates and on-site vaccination booths through novel partnerships that
foster economic growth in the future. They can also notify employees of all relevant vaccination information even
if they do not sponsor them. This raises employees’ awareness of how to get vaccinated. Making the process
stress-free, easy, and free would enable more employees to get vaccinated.
Fluency Heuristic:
We tend to choose options that
are easy to think about.
Knowing that vaccines are
accessible and free with
minimal concerns creates
fluency, and people are likely
to favor those easy options.
Availability Heuristic:
Our tendency to base decisions on the most
readily available information is important
alongside getting the vaccine for free (or low
cost) without much difficulty. If information
regarding the schedule of getting the vaccine is
readily available, it will help planning or to get
friends and family an appointment.
Example: The Marriott hotel chain in the US and Canada is offering 4 hours of pay to housekeeping staff that
gets vaccinated. Retailer ALDI is planning to open on-site vaccination booths for its employees and ensure no
one loses pay or has to take extra effort to get vaccinated.
Trusted authorities and leaders can endorse vaccine drives.
2
People generally love trusting, pleasantly attractive people. Authorities who go on video can take extra effort to
present themselves in appealing ways.
Authority Bias:
Humans tend to follow those in positions of authority blindly. Those who disseminate information or
give instructions should appear like authorities.
Halo Effect:
Humans often let their positive impressions (either overall or a specific quality) of something "spill over"
to other aspects. Stakeholders and other faces involved repeatedly in any drive or clinic’s work should
be caring and warm. People will judge their intentions favorably based on their appearances.
Attribute Substitution:
When people find it hard to base a decision on complex information, they often switch to something
simpler to evaluate to make a decision. Influencers on social media, famous content creators, actors
known for community work, etc., are easy to follow. People will likely make vaccine plans based on
what the influencers and authorities say instead of evaluating the science.
Example: Biden’s “We can do this” ad campaign is aimed at reducing vaccine hesitancy with celebrity, authority,
and influencer partners.
30. 30
Access to social and economic privileges, perks, and
goodies depend on vaccination.
3
Popular dating restaurants and bars, gyms and sporting centers, couple-centric vacation spot hotels, etc., can
offer sponsored vaccines to kick-start their business with the incentive of using their facilities. However, they can
also make patron vaccination mandatory to avail their services. For example, these locations could help set up
vaccination booths in their locality to foster it. It can be branded as a “vaxi-cation” where hotels offer extended
holiday for those who vaccinate at their locations. Businesses can offer perks to patrons to hype vaccine
messaging.
Behavioral Contingencies:
Getting vaccinated can give privileges that act as additional rewards to appeal to a person’s emotions.
These If-then conditions can become deployable systems to encourage those who are ambivalent
about getting the vaccine immediately.
Hyperbolic Discounting:
Humans usually prefer smaller immediate rewards (privileges) over larger-long term rewards (better
public health). Employers, insurers, banks, and clinics can create reward schemes that give immediate
pay-offs for choosing to get vaccinated. Those with a weaker motivation to get vaccinated may use
those immediate pay-offs as additional motivation. Offering delayed pay-offs or long-term benefits may
not work as well as immediate privileges.
Example: Krispy Kreme is giving away 1 free daily donut to anyone who shows a vaccine passport
from a US location.
Provide priority vaccine access for hospitality and
educational staff.
4
Providing priority access to vaccinations beyond the eligibility criteria can help save businesses from losses, help
employees retain the funding necessary for their payroll, and simultaneously make their employees and patrons
feel safer. Specific categories of employees such as hospitality staff (hotels, airlines), educational staff (teachers,
administrators), and store employees can get priority vaccines to ensure their patrons feel safe enough to avail
their services and secure their own employment through uncertain tourism and educational trends. This helps the
businesses achieve their economic and business goals or recover from the uncertainty and loss that came with
the pandemic.
Adaptive Bias:
People typically show a tendency to play it safe than be sorry. This motivation from patrons becomes
an incentive for employers to ensure their services are as safe as possible and one way to do this is to
vaccinate employees who need to come in close contact with patrons.
Example: United Airlines, American Airlines, and Southwest Airlines strongly encourage their flight crew to get
vaccinated.
Offer presale commitments to employees.
5
There are categories of people who want the vaccine in many locations in the US but are not yet eligible.
Employers can partner with clinics and book their vaccinations, almost guaranteeing early access for the
motivated ones. This will speed up the vaccination drive enough to accelerate other strategies like creating
FOMO and social proof.
31. 31
Illusion of Control:
For those who are highly motivated to get a vaccine, it will be helpful to give them a pre-sale or a
provisional appointment to feel more in control of their health before things take an unexpected turn for
the worse. A basic psychological need for control fuels the illusion of control. This bias makes us act in
a way to reduce uncertainty and feel more secure.
Example: A clinic from Des Moines attempted a first-come-first-served vaccine roll-out and quickly ran out of
doses. Scaling such a distribution model in a few select locations as an on-site tie-up with a bigger company can
ensure vaccine security for employers who may not have easy alternatives based on eligibility criteria.
Convert the idea of individual vaccination into a public
health act.
6
Most executives would agree that a company creates a sense of community that goes beyond just the
employees; it creates a vision, and a healthy company usually means the workforce acts as a single organism.
This sentiment created by employees aligning with a company’s identity is the key reason people are motivated
to act as a single organism. Making healthcare and COVID-19 vaccination a part of this “vision” will make it easy
for employers to get their workforce onboard any vaccination drive without enforcing it.
Meta-personal Self-construal:
The meta-personal self-construal is our identity that goes beyond professions & relationships. Aligning
with the greater good or moral/spiritual obligation toward society is a meta-personal level of identity. It
is a powerful motivator to engage in behavior that affects a whole community positively. If people are
led to focus on their part in society and how they are “collectively” a single unit, it will bias them to favor
decisions that help other people.
Construal level theory:
Behaviors can be construed at many levels ranging from abstract to concrete. At the most narrow,
concrete level, individual vaccination is a self-serving act. At a broad, abstract level, it is a small part of
public health. If people are encouraged to think in general, broad terms and not specific terms, it will get
people to value community health.
Example: CEOs are becoming vaccine activists and offering cash or time-off incentives, and leading by example
as part of their pro-vaccine “vision” for the workforce. Budweiser, for the first time in 40 years, did not show an ad
during the Super Bowl and instead donated the allocated spending to a pro-vaccine ad campaign.
32. 32
Managing the Last 10-20%
of the Most Hesitant
Messaging and incentives might not work
on a small percentage of people;
what do we do then?
33. 33
Realistically speaking, not all humans will be pro-vaccine.
Some may be neutrally hesitant or just misinformed about
side effects and risks, but some may discourage others.
Some have little trust in authorities and follow conspiracy
theories, and a few even try to disrupt vaccine drives.
Research suggests people endorse coronavirus
conspiracy theories because they jump to conclusions
without gathering enough information (jumping-to-
conclusions bias) and commit to pre-held notions even if
they are wrong (bias against disconfirmatory evidence),
but they may also think they might be wrong in their
beliefs. The overall effect of this is that a small
percentage of the population will remain
unvaccinated despite all messaging optimizations
and incentives. They might prolong the pandemic by
giving the virus a chance to infect, mutate, and
spread. People show the reactance effect where they
rebel when they feel rules and policies interfere with their
freedoms and authorities take away their choices unjustly.
In such cases, many tend to rebel and try to defy
authorities. Vaccine skepticism manifests when
that happens. In some cases, the reactance effect
is strong enough to motivate skeptics to disrupt
logistics, others’ motivation to vaccinate, and even
influence the primary narrative around a sensitive
topic. For example, a small percentage of skeptics
may control 50% of the narrative and over-
represent the negatives of something very good.
Managing the last 10-20% of people means telling
everyone why we need to be in this fight together,
psychologically inoculating people against
misinformation, encouraging the mildly hesitant
through careful persuasion, and countering the
disruptive effects of anti-vax ideologies.
Barrier:
Skeptics may try to disrupt smooth
operations, spread misinformation, and
discourage others from vaccinating. The
cost of managing the last 10-20% of
unvaccinated people might increase but
with diminishing returns.
Solution:
Minimize the damage caused by them and try to
encourage the mildly hesitant (after messaging and
incentives fail) instead of converting the most
hesitant. Messaging and incentives would ideally
convert some of the highly hesitant to mildly
hesitant. We’ll look at the solution in depth across
a few parameters.
Tell skeptics and hesitant people why everyone should be
on the same page for improved public health
Highlight the non-zero-sum game: Getting a vaccine is always a win-win for everyone.
A successful vaccine drive means a whole community gets vaccinated. A concept called “the zero-sum game” is
often embedded in our thinking. For example, running to a store to buy something before others get it is a zero-
sum game. Here, one person’s gain is another person’s loss. It also happens in parking lots where the first
person to find the last empty slot wins, and the person trailing behind you usually loses. However, the pandemic
and getting vaccinated are not zero-sum games - one person’s gain is everyone else’s gain, and one
person’s loss is everyone else’s loss. One person getting infected (a loss) can infect someone else (another
loss) - a loss-loss scenario and the enemy disease by disrupting the economy, perceived freedom, and public
health. One person getting vaccinated (a gain) means someone else might not get infected (a gain) - a win-win
scenario. This is the reason why a successful vaccine drive cannot exclude people who are demotivated or
engage in conspiracy theories to justify their lack of intention to get vaccinated.
Messaging should highlight whom we are fighting - COVID-19, not people, not authorities, not doctors.
Getting vaccinated means someone else will not
have to suffer a 15-day quarantine.
Following safety protocols means tired doctors,
frontline workers, and technical experts can rest a
little bit longer after a year of struggle.
More vaccines mean fewer people would need to
go to a hospital, pay money, or enable lockdowns
and curfews.
Getting vaccinated counters the reactance effect,
and people regain control and freedom as soon as
possible.
1
34. 34
If everyone depends on herd immunity, no one gets the vaccine, and no one gets “herd” immunity.
People may think - “Let others get the vaccine, and I will be protected by herd immunity.” While this may work if
only a few people don’t vaccinate, it can’t work if no one gets vaccinated. People often show diffusion of
responsibility, where they take less and less personal responsibility as the group’s size increases. Here they
may choose not to vaccinate themselves just because so many others can take the burden of vaccinating and
building herd immunity for everyone else. Herd immunity cannot develop without a majority of a population
becoming immune. A reasonable goal of vaccinating 80-90% of a population can ensure the virus hardly gets a
chance to spread and possibly safeguard exactly those people for whom the vaccine is medically unsuited.
Stakeholders can reduce the diffusion of responsibility by focusing on smaller groups instead of whole states to
ensure there is lesser diffusion - office colleagues, neighborhoods, counties, sports friends, etc., are small
enough groups that preserve individuality. Focusing on a smaller group can be more relatable and will not drown
out the value of each person’s immunization.
Use Psychological inoculation: A way to vaccinate a person psychologically to reject and battle virus-
like misinformation.
Psychological inoculation is a process similar to biological inoculation. Inoculation triggers the immune system to
create defenses using a weakened dose of the virus/compound instead of a strong dose that could overwhelm
the immune system. Small doses create a chain reaction to build enough immunity so that the immune system is
prepared to fend off future exposure to the same (or similar) virus. If we treat misinformation like a virus,
psychological inoculation can create a similar defense and preparedness to manage more persuasive
misinformation. Psychological inoculation begins with delivering small doses of misinformation and facilitating
people’s ability to counter them with evidence and theoretical explanations that make sense to them. These
weakened misinformation doses can help protect people from future, stronger misinformation that could be a
threat. Psychological inoculation can be effective if it comes from both doctors and non-healthcare individuals
because a doctor’s authority and an individual’s relatability can have a powerful effect.
How to reduce the number of vaccine skeptics, conspiracy
theorists, and misinformed stakeholders
2
Navigate the Latitude of Acceptance: Meet people where they are and walk toward a vaccine using
empathy and acceptance
Most people hold attitudes and beliefs with little flexibility. If people believe a vaccine is 95% effective, they are
likely to believe it is 85-99% effective. However, they are unlikely to accept that vaccines are only 25% effective.
The range of flexibility or variation in statements that people consider believable or acceptable is called the
Latitude of Acceptance (LoA). Here the range 85%-99% is a hypothetical LoA for those who believe vaccines
are 95% effective. 25% is far outside that range, and when information is far outside the LoA, it is often
dismissed, hard to accept, or unfathomable.
How to encourage mildly skeptical people to immunize
themselves
3
The LoA opens the door to 2 types of biases: The Semmelweis Effect & the Confirmation Bias.
When a salesman or a “persuader” talks to someone
within their LoA, it facilitates Confirmation Bias.
A customer who is being persuaded may resonate
with the salesperson if the conversational content is
within the LoA because it can confirm one’s
preconceived notions.
Suppose the conversational content is outside
the LoA. In that case, it facilitates the
Semmelweis effect, where a person reflexively
rejects the conversational content if it disagrees
with one’s preconceived notions and beliefs.
35. 35
Convincing a vaccine skeptic to vaccinate would typically require effort to understand their base attitudes and
beliefs. Slowly persuade them to accept less vaccine-averse beliefs such as “not all vaccines cause problems,
but there are some instances where they have caused more damage than good; like a severe allergic reaction.”
Instead of attacking their beliefs, show empathy. Those beliefs offer an acceptable and plausible explanation for
emotional or unexplained adverse events in one’s life. To shift the LoA to include a positive attitude toward
vaccines, address the emotional concerns, and focus on the most likely scenarios with concrete examples at the
favorable end of the LoA. Avoid making general remarks about vaccinations or the sciences. Encourage taking a
chance with a specific vaccine that has ample anecdotal support. Incrementally giving relatable pro-vaccine
information at the edge of one’s LoA will shift the LoA from a hypothetical “vaccines are 75-90% useless” to “The
COVID-19 vaccine is only 5% useless.”
The coronavirus vaccine is 90%+ effective, but people have been taking a 50% effective flu
shot routinely.
Counter the narrative and influence: Limit the
spread of misinformation give people
ground-reality insights
Reduce the disruptive action of anti-vaxxers by focusing
on damage control
4
At one point, not more than a small percentage of
“the last mile” will vaccinate. Part of the reason is
a dual-action of anti-vaxxers - not getting
vaccinated themselves and disrupting others’
opportunity and motivation to vaccinate.
Why?
One blanket solution to do some damage control is to
reduce misinformation, fear-mongering, and skepticism in
daily conversations, news, and social media. This will
restrict the emotional contagion (viral spread of emotions
between people) of negative information and not feed the
skeptic/hesitant person’s confirmation bias or the
Availability Heuristic. It will ensure skeptics don’t control the
popular narrative to devalue vaccine drives and their
successes.
The Illusory Truth Effect occurs - Repeatedly hearing vaccines are bad makes it easy to process
those statements, making them appear more accurate.
The Survivorship Bias occurs - Bad news, which seems more “news-worthy,” survives in our
awareness and neutral news goes unnoticed. This amplifies the illusory truth effect. That over-
represents negative stories about the vaccine making people believe vaccine failures/complications
are the norm.
“87% percent of COVID-19 news stories by U.S. major media outlets are
negative in tone versus 50% for non-U.S. major sources.”
According to a recent study, news in the US may be more negatively biased than in other countries. A possible
reason for this is that Americans may have a higher negativity bias - negative information readily grabs our
attention. That encourages media agencies to tailor the tone of the news to pull their attention even more.
Competition between multiple news sources may have also led to more extreme “cautionary” sensationalism
where reporting more negative news implied better coverage of the ground reality.
36. 36
Specific tips to reduce skepticism-induced damage:
News agencies can focus more on painting a positive image of vaccines instead of a negative one just for
sensationalism.
Just like people were nudged to wear a mask habitually, people can be encouraged to ward off
misinformation habitually. This would mean the media doses the audience with bits of “reality checks” with
field-level pictures and videos. The goal here would be to ensure that ambiguous narratives from skeptics
cannot disrupt something most people can see with their own eyes.
Demonstrate how the freedom of not getting vaccinated is no different from the freedom to deny services to
those who aren’t vaccinated.
1
2
3
37. 37
The 1918 influenza pandemic killed over 50 million people around the world over the
next two years. There were no vaccines or antibiotics to help patients and since the
pandemic happened in the middle of WWI, attempts in social distancing and isolation
were not very successful.
Fast forward roughly 100 years to 2019 when the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic started and
has since then killed 3.2 million people worldwide.
In less than 12 months, pharmaceutical companies in many countries have worked at
warp speed to develop, test and commercialize vaccines for COVID. All the vaccines
have shown near perfect protection against severe disease, hospitalizations and death
resulting from COVID. Real world data on many vaccines has also shown 60-90%
reduction in transmission of the virus.
Based on facts alone, the risk/reward benefit analysis should be in favor of taking the
vaccine for most Americans. Yet, 30-40% of people in the US are hesitant and while
they may not outright reject the vaccine, they are also not eager to get it right now.
Vaccine hesitancy can't be overcome with education alone; it's a behavioral science
problem that requires use of all behavioral science tools available to us. By using a
combination of mindful messaging, valued incentives and smart nudges, Americans
can be persuaded to get COVID vaccine protection ASAP.
While the majority of behavior change has to be driven by public health organizations
and the government, employers can also play a big role in nudging people at work
towards vaccination, thereby accelerating America's return to normalcy.
We hope this special report provides a detailed roadmap to all stakeholders involved in
the COVID vaccination program.
Concluding Remarks