New level proctoring
SaaS for distant
examinations
Distant exams are
applicable today in many
areas
All of them meet the same problem:
how to verify the results of the learning
process and of the examination
K-12
Higher education
Language
courses
Corporate
qualification
Safety technique courses
in manufacturing
Students can use various types of cheating
to get certificate
Using of inappropriate
system apps
Voice hints
Student replacement
Using external materials
Using external web
Trusted? Really?
Proctoring needed
Cyber vs. Human
proctoring
Cyber proctoring Human proctoring
Pros:
• Searches through all events by given rules
• Does not get tired
• Detects violations unseen for the human (e.g., second video
output device)
• Cheap
Pros:
• Takes into account human factor
• Can talk to student
• Recognizes untypical violations
• Higher level of psychological deterrent to cheating
• Decisions contested more rare
Contras:
• Not interactive
• Does not recognize difficult cases, can be cheated easily
• Cases of cheating are twice more often*
• People are not comfortable with being supervised by the
machine*
Contras:
• Cannot recognize all events
• Can be tired, upset, absent-minded
• Expensive!
* According to 2015 ANNUAL PROCTORING & LEARNER AUTHENTICATION SURVEY
Automated algorithms are not yet enough sufficient and
people are not happy with being supervised by machines
Issue Automated proctor Human Proctor
Contestation of the proctoring results by
students
9 % 3%
Number of professors, unsatisfied with proctoring
results
14,5 % 3,5 %
Number of cheating attempts 62 % 36 %
* According to 2015 ANNUAL PROCTORING & LEARNER AUTHENTICATION SURVEY
Examus proposes the mixt of
human and cyber proctoring
that brings proctoring services
to the new level.
Machines work, people take decisions
Cyber-proctor detects: Human proctor does:
• Face recognition
• Peeping
• The absence of the student
• The presence of a stranger
• Human voice detection
• Second screen connection
• Using of inappropriate apps
• Human identification with ID
• Chat interaction
• Verification of the cyber proctor’s alert
• Termination of the examination.
Cyber-proctor detects typical
violations
Human proctor verifies them
and concentrates only on
difficult cases
Human proctor can monitor
more sessions with the same
quality
The history of cyber-proctoring is
recorded and can be recovered if
human proctor distracted
Understand the signals from
the automated system
React correctly using the
guidelines
Work with the pre-scribed
scripts
They do not have to be
professionals in the subject
They may be employees of
Examus or of the customers
How do human proctors
do their job?
Our proctors are experienced teachers
supported by automatic algorithms.
Once integrated with your LMS, Examus collects, analyses and
synchronizes the data about the process of examination
Request submission
List of exams
Integration
EXAMUS LMSSubmission of the beginning
of exam
Current status of exam
End of exam
Request of available exams
Materials of exam
Authorization request
Authorization request
List of exams
Subscription for exam
Start of exam
STUDENT
TEAM:
Alexandr Khalfin – Co-founder, 3rd startup,
Project Management
Vasilij Tretyakov – Advisor, expert in
education and EdTech, Director of the
institute of open education at the Urals
Federal University
Dmitriy Istomin – Co-founder and CEO,
4th startup, Sales and Marketing
Andrey Sheka – Co-founder, CTO, PhD
Thank you!
CEO:
Dmitriy Istomin
Tel +79122633266
distomin@examus.net
Skype istomin.dmitry
examus@examus.net
http://examus.info

Examus pitch

  • 1.
    New level proctoring SaaSfor distant examinations
  • 2.
    Distant exams are applicabletoday in many areas All of them meet the same problem: how to verify the results of the learning process and of the examination K-12 Higher education Language courses Corporate qualification Safety technique courses in manufacturing
  • 3.
    Students can usevarious types of cheating to get certificate Using of inappropriate system apps Voice hints Student replacement Using external materials Using external web Trusted? Really? Proctoring needed
  • 4.
    Cyber vs. Human proctoring Cyberproctoring Human proctoring Pros: • Searches through all events by given rules • Does not get tired • Detects violations unseen for the human (e.g., second video output device) • Cheap Pros: • Takes into account human factor • Can talk to student • Recognizes untypical violations • Higher level of psychological deterrent to cheating • Decisions contested more rare Contras: • Not interactive • Does not recognize difficult cases, can be cheated easily • Cases of cheating are twice more often* • People are not comfortable with being supervised by the machine* Contras: • Cannot recognize all events • Can be tired, upset, absent-minded • Expensive! * According to 2015 ANNUAL PROCTORING & LEARNER AUTHENTICATION SURVEY
  • 5.
    Automated algorithms arenot yet enough sufficient and people are not happy with being supervised by machines Issue Automated proctor Human Proctor Contestation of the proctoring results by students 9 % 3% Number of professors, unsatisfied with proctoring results 14,5 % 3,5 % Number of cheating attempts 62 % 36 % * According to 2015 ANNUAL PROCTORING & LEARNER AUTHENTICATION SURVEY
  • 6.
    Examus proposes themixt of human and cyber proctoring that brings proctoring services to the new level.
  • 7.
    Machines work, peopletake decisions Cyber-proctor detects: Human proctor does: • Face recognition • Peeping • The absence of the student • The presence of a stranger • Human voice detection • Second screen connection • Using of inappropriate apps • Human identification with ID • Chat interaction • Verification of the cyber proctor’s alert • Termination of the examination. Cyber-proctor detects typical violations Human proctor verifies them and concentrates only on difficult cases Human proctor can monitor more sessions with the same quality The history of cyber-proctoring is recorded and can be recovered if human proctor distracted
  • 8.
    Understand the signalsfrom the automated system React correctly using the guidelines Work with the pre-scribed scripts They do not have to be professionals in the subject They may be employees of Examus or of the customers How do human proctors do their job? Our proctors are experienced teachers supported by automatic algorithms.
  • 9.
    Once integrated withyour LMS, Examus collects, analyses and synchronizes the data about the process of examination
  • 10.
    Request submission List ofexams Integration EXAMUS LMSSubmission of the beginning of exam Current status of exam End of exam Request of available exams Materials of exam Authorization request Authorization request List of exams Subscription for exam Start of exam STUDENT
  • 11.
    TEAM: Alexandr Khalfin –Co-founder, 3rd startup, Project Management Vasilij Tretyakov – Advisor, expert in education and EdTech, Director of the institute of open education at the Urals Federal University Dmitriy Istomin – Co-founder and CEO, 4th startup, Sales and Marketing Andrey Sheka – Co-founder, CTO, PhD
  • 12.
    Thank you! CEO: Dmitriy Istomin Tel+79122633266 distomin@examus.net Skype istomin.dmitry examus@examus.net http://examus.info