1. Discussion: Evolution of medical malpractice.
Discussion: Evolution of medical malpractice.Discussion: Evolution of medical
malpractice.Early attempts at quality efforts were limited to the resources, knowledge, and
environment in which health care services and treatment were rendered. As medical
education and research advanced so did the knowledge of and focus on quality
improvement efforts. Basic functions including hand washing and sterile environments
were two of the many simple advancements resulting in dramatic improvements in
outcomes and overall quality. Regulatory agencies have directly impacted health care
organizations’ focus on, and attention to, quality improvement. Founded in 1951, The Joint
Commission offers accreditation to various health care organizations who demonstrate
compliance with established regulatory standards. Combined with various government
agencies, initiatives have been implemented that require health care organizations to report
on quality measures, thereby making their quality performance transparent throughout the
industry.As a leader in the health care industry, understanding historical perspectives of
quality, regulatory oversight, and medical malpractice will allow you to effectively lead your
organization to meet or exceed its strategic goals related to improved outcomes, increased
reimbursements, and reduced cost. DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY By successfully
completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course
competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 2:
Explain the development of health regulation and the evolution of medical
malpractice.Explain the evolution of medical malpractice.Analyze the development of health
regulation and regulatory agencies.ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE
PAPERSAnalyze how regulatory agencies have impacted the quality of care.Evaluate ways in
which quality has improved or not improved since the 1800s.Competency 4: Communicate
in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and
integrity of others.Produce writing that conveys understanding of the topic, its context, and
its relevance.Use academic writing conventions such as APA formatting and citation style, or
others as required. Discussion: Evolution of medical malpractice.Produce writing that
includes minimal grammar, usage, and mechanical errors, including spelling.Explain the
evolution of medical malpractice.Analyze why regulatory agencies began monitoring quality
in health care.Explain how organizations like the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ), the Joint Commission, and other regulatory agencies have impacted quality
of care.Explain what is meant by ”deemed status.”Describe how current attempts at
quality compare to efforts on quality in the 1800s.Evaluate ways in which quality has
2. improved or not improved since the 1800s.Title Page.Introduction.Preview the main
themes of your paper.Historical Review of Quality of Care.Describe how current attempts at
quality compare to efforts on quality in the 1800s.Analyze why regulatory agencies began
monitoring quality in health care.Describe the history of medical malpractice, when it
peaked, why it peaked, and what has been done to address medical malpractice.The practice
of defensive medicineDiscuss initiatives taken by health care organizations to reduce
and/or mitigate risksRegulatory Agencies.Explain what is meant by ”deemed
status.”Briefly describe the purpose and goals of the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ).Briefly describe the purpose and goals of The Joint Commission.Explain
how organizations like the AHRQ, The Joint Commission, and other regulatory agencies
have impacted quality of care.Improving Quality of Care by Understanding
History.Conclusion.Summarize the main themes of your paper.References.Your paper will
be a minimum of 3–5 double-spaced pages in length, not including title and reference
pages.Font: Times New Roman 12-point.Cite at least four references.Format your paper
according to current APA style guidelines.SCORING GUIDE Use the scoring guide to
understand how your assessment will be evaluated. VIEW SCORING GUIDECRITERIANON-
PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Explain the evolution of medical
malpractice. Does not explain the evolution of medical malpractice. Discusses the current
state of medical malpractice but does not provide a historical perspective. Explains the
evolution of medical malpractice. Explains the evolution of medical malpractice. s the
evolution and history with references to the literature. Analyze the development of health
regulation and regulatory agencies. Does not address the development of health regulation
and regulatory agencies. Describes but does not analyze the development of health
regulation and regulatory agencies. Analyzes the development of health regulation and
regulatory agencies. Analyzes the development of health regulation and regulatory agencies.
s analysis with references to the literature. Analyze how regulatory agencies have impacted
the quality of care.Discussion: Evolution of medical malpractice.Does not address how
regulatory agencies have impacted the quality of care. Describes but does not analyze how
regulatory agencies have impacted the quality of care. Analyzes how regulatory agencies
have impacted the quality of care. Analyzes how regulatory agencies have impacted the
quality of care. s analysis with references to the literature. Evaluate ways in which quality
has improved or not improved since the 1800s.Does not address ways in which quality has
improved or not improved since the 1800s.Describes but does not evaluate ways in which
quality has improved or not improved since the 1800s.Evaluates ways in which quality has
improved or not improved since the 1800s.Evaluates ways in which quality has improved
or not improved since the 1800s. Provides examples that the evaluation. Produce writing
that conveys understanding of the topic, its context, and its relevance. Does not produce
writing that conveys understanding of the topic, its context, and its relevance. Produces
writing that conveys understanding of the topic, its context, or its relevance, but not all
three. Produces writing that conveys understanding of the topic, its context, and its
relevance. Produces writing that conveys exemplary understanding of the topic, its context,
and its relevance. Use academic writing conventions such as APA formatting and citation
style, or others as required. Does not use academic writing conventions such as APA
3. formatting and citation style, or others as required. Inconsistently uses academic writing
conventions such as APA formatting and citation style, or others as required. Discussion:
Evolution of medical malpractice.
