We have identified issues related to composition of a business process and discussed the requirements for event-driven composition and event-driven service-oriented architecture.
This document discusses problems that can arise with service-oriented architectures (SOA) if not implemented properly, as well as presenting an alternative approach. Some key issues mentioned include systems becoming more fragile, higher development and maintenance costs, and services not being reused as intended. The alternative approach presented focuses on autonomy, loose coupling, encapsulation, and using business events to help achieve these goals. It is argued that this can drive business agility while avoiding consistency issues.
This document discusses debates around service-oriented architecture (SOA) concepts like loose coupling, autonomy, and reuse. It argues against views that autonomy and loose coupling should be primary goals, and that reuse is not important. Instead, it argues that the goal of SOA is to achieve autonomy for systems of record, not individual services. Reuse happens through maintaining stable interfaces while changing implementations to meet new consumer needs. An enterprise service bus (ESB) can help decouple interfaces from implementations to manage changes. Overall, the document advocates for a more nuanced, relational view of SOA concepts versus views that services should aim to be fully autonomous.
The document discusses event driven architecture and how it compares to service oriented architecture. It defines key concepts in event driven architecture like events, commands, autonomous components, event producers and consumers. It also provides an example of how the .NET library MassTransit implements concepts like loose coupling and publish/subscribe using messages and events.
The "Why", "What" and "How" of Microservices INPAY
This document discusses microservices and alternatives to monolithic architectures. It begins by outlining the costs of software maintenance for monoliths and reasons why architectures need to change to adapt quickly. Alternatives like SOA are discussed, but microservices are presented as a way to break applications into fine-grained, independent services. However, the document cautions that simply breaking a monolith into smaller pieces does not automatically achieve decoupling, and improper use of microservices could result in even greater complexity. Autonomous services with explicit boundaries and asynchronous communication are emphasized as important characteristics to achieve decoupling.
This document provides an overview of event-driven architecture and how it is supported by the WSO2 platform. It defines key concepts like events, publishers and subscribers, and how these interact in an event-driven system. It also describes how WSO2 products like the ESB, message broker, CEP and BAM can be used to implement event-driven patterns for messaging, complex event processing, and business activity monitoring. The document concludes with a demonstration of how to build an event-driven system on WSO2 to detect delayed flight events.
In this presentation, I will explain event driven architecture, describe the different types of events, demonstrate how events can be related and orchestrated, and provide a basic understanding of how this method can drive the architecture of enterprise systems. In addition to understanding the concepts of event driven architecture, we will explore a working sample built using an open-source .NET messaging framework called MassTransit.
The document discusses Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) and the role of the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL). It defines SOA as an architectural style that allows components to work together through standardized interfaces. BPEL is presented as an XML-based language used to specify business processes composed of discrete web services. BPEL allows the orchestration of services by defining message sequences and processing logic. It bridges the bottom-up exposure of services and the top-down definition of business processes in SOA.
Introduction to business process execution languagesuranisaunak
This document provides an introduction to Business Process Execution Language (BPEL). It discusses what BPM and SOA are and how BPEL fits into these approaches. BPEL allows processes to be defined using XML that can integrate multiple web services. Key components of BPEL include activities to receive, assign, invoke and reply to messages. The document also summarizes Oracle BPEL Process Manager, a tool for developing, deploying and managing BPEL processes.
This document discusses problems that can arise with service-oriented architectures (SOA) if not implemented properly, as well as presenting an alternative approach. Some key issues mentioned include systems becoming more fragile, higher development and maintenance costs, and services not being reused as intended. The alternative approach presented focuses on autonomy, loose coupling, encapsulation, and using business events to help achieve these goals. It is argued that this can drive business agility while avoiding consistency issues.
This document discusses debates around service-oriented architecture (SOA) concepts like loose coupling, autonomy, and reuse. It argues against views that autonomy and loose coupling should be primary goals, and that reuse is not important. Instead, it argues that the goal of SOA is to achieve autonomy for systems of record, not individual services. Reuse happens through maintaining stable interfaces while changing implementations to meet new consumer needs. An enterprise service bus (ESB) can help decouple interfaces from implementations to manage changes. Overall, the document advocates for a more nuanced, relational view of SOA concepts versus views that services should aim to be fully autonomous.
The document discusses event driven architecture and how it compares to service oriented architecture. It defines key concepts in event driven architecture like events, commands, autonomous components, event producers and consumers. It also provides an example of how the .NET library MassTransit implements concepts like loose coupling and publish/subscribe using messages and events.
The "Why", "What" and "How" of Microservices INPAY
This document discusses microservices and alternatives to monolithic architectures. It begins by outlining the costs of software maintenance for monoliths and reasons why architectures need to change to adapt quickly. Alternatives like SOA are discussed, but microservices are presented as a way to break applications into fine-grained, independent services. However, the document cautions that simply breaking a monolith into smaller pieces does not automatically achieve decoupling, and improper use of microservices could result in even greater complexity. Autonomous services with explicit boundaries and asynchronous communication are emphasized as important characteristics to achieve decoupling.
This document provides an overview of event-driven architecture and how it is supported by the WSO2 platform. It defines key concepts like events, publishers and subscribers, and how these interact in an event-driven system. It also describes how WSO2 products like the ESB, message broker, CEP and BAM can be used to implement event-driven patterns for messaging, complex event processing, and business activity monitoring. The document concludes with a demonstration of how to build an event-driven system on WSO2 to detect delayed flight events.
In this presentation, I will explain event driven architecture, describe the different types of events, demonstrate how events can be related and orchestrated, and provide a basic understanding of how this method can drive the architecture of enterprise systems. In addition to understanding the concepts of event driven architecture, we will explore a working sample built using an open-source .NET messaging framework called MassTransit.
The document discusses Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) and the role of the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL). It defines SOA as an architectural style that allows components to work together through standardized interfaces. BPEL is presented as an XML-based language used to specify business processes composed of discrete web services. BPEL allows the orchestration of services by defining message sequences and processing logic. It bridges the bottom-up exposure of services and the top-down definition of business processes in SOA.
Introduction to business process execution languagesuranisaunak
This document provides an introduction to Business Process Execution Language (BPEL). It discusses what BPM and SOA are and how BPEL fits into these approaches. BPEL allows processes to be defined using XML that can integrate multiple web services. Key components of BPEL include activities to receive, assign, invoke and reply to messages. The document also summarizes Oracle BPEL Process Manager, a tool for developing, deploying and managing BPEL processes.
Service Oriented Architecture and Business Process Modeling OverviewJean Ferguson
Overview of Service Oriented Architecture and Business Process Modeling as it applies to the Open Library Environment Project as presented at the Regional Design Workshops.
InterConnect 2017 HBP-3394-Enable innovative cloud solutions with IBM BPM and...Brian Petrini
This document discusses enabling innovative cloud solutions using IBM BPM and APIs with Process Connect. It provides an overview of Process Connect and how it has matured over the past year to support REST and OpenAPI standards. Process Connect allows IBM BPM processes to consume and expose APIs to enable scenarios like infusing cognitive APIs into processes or cloud applications invoking process APIs. The document also discusses API Connect and how it can be used to manage APIs invoked or exposed by processes.
Service Oriented Architecture Design PatternShanto Rahman
The presentation covered service oriented architecture design patterns including contract centralization, contract denormalization, and the facade design pattern. It provided examples of each pattern and discussed when they should be used. It also presented a case study on redesigning an inventory management system to better utilize these patterns and abstract interactions with a legacy system.