The research aims to explore the most effective and humane training methods for teaching dogs new skills and behaviors.

1. PAWSITIVE CANINE TRAINING: EVALUATING
EFFECTIVE & HUMANE METHODS ACROSS
BREEDS
TRINITY WILLIAMS
RESEARCH METHOD
PROFESSOR
ADRIENNE WHEELER

2. EFFECTIVE AND HUMANE DOG TRAINING METHODS
• The research aims to explore the most effective and
humane training methods for teaching dogs new skills and
behaviors.
• Key question: What methods are most successful, and
how can they be applied to different breeds and individual
dogs?
• Objectives:
• Evaluate the success rates of various training
methods across different breeds and training levels.
• Understand the impact of past training experiences on
present success rates.
• Analyze the quantitative relationship between training
days and behavioral scores.
• Uncover qualitative insights from dog owners and vet
recommendations.
• This presentation will comprehensively analyze data
collected from diverse breeds and training backgrounds to
inform tailored and ethical dog training practices.
• All canines originate from varying levels of training
exposure, ranging from minimal to moderate.
• The applied training methodologies encompass Clicker
Training, Mixed Methods, and Positive Reinforcement.

3. TRAINING LEVELS DISTRIBUTION
ACROSS BREEDS
Breed Past Level Improved Levels
Golden
Doodle Novice Novice
Shepherd
Inu Novice Advanced
Cockapoo Novice Novice
Yorkie Intermediate Intermediate
Labrador Intermediate Advanced
Pitbull Novice Novice
Shih Tzu Intermediate Intermediate
Beagle Intermediate Advanced
Bulldog Novice Intermediate
Cavapoo Novice Intermediate
These charts provide an overview of past and
present training levels across different dog
breeds:
Intermediate:
•Beagle and Labrador had a success rate of 75%.
•Shih Tzu and Yorkie both had a success rate of 70%.
The overall average success rate for Intermediate training
was 72.5%.
Novice:
•Bulldogs and Shepherd Inu had a success rate of 65%.
•Cavapoo had a success rate of 60%.
•Pitbull achieved a success rate of 55%.
•Cockapoo and Golden Doodle achieved a success rate of 50%.
The overall average success rate for Novice training was
57.5%.
Observation:
•Higher success rates were observed for Intermediate-trained dogs compared
to Novice-trained dogs.
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Beagle
Bulldog
Cavapoo
Cockapoo
Golden Doodle
Labrador
Pitbull
Shepherd Inu
Shih Tzu
Yorkie
Intermediate
Novice
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Beagle
Bulldog
Cavapoo
Cockapoo
Golden Doodle
Labrador
Pitbull
Shepherd Inu
Shih Tzu
Yorkie
Advanced
Intermediate
Novice
Advanced:
•Beagle and Labrador had a success rate of 85%.
•Shepherd Inu achieved a success rate of 90%.
The overall average success rate for Advanced training was 86.67%.
Intermediate:
•Bulldogs, Cavapoo, Shih Tzu, and Yorkie achieved a success rate of 75%.
The overall average success rate for Intermediate training was 75%.
Novice:
•Golden Doodle achieved a success rate of 55%.
•Cockapoo and Pitbull had a success rate of 60%.
The overall average success rate for Novice training was 58.33%.
Observation:
•Dogs with Advanced training had the highest success rates, followed by
Intermediate and Novice levels.
Past Level
Present Level

4. REGRESSION ANALYSIS: PAST BEHAVIORAL SCORES
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.850272869
R Square 0.722963952
Adjusted R Square 0.688334446
Standard Error 5.271639078
Observations 10
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 580.1785714 580.1785714 20.87710843 0.001827832
Residual 8 222.3214286 27.79017857
Total 9 802.5
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 55.35714286 2.440294709 22.68461373 1.51093E-08 49.72981317 60.98447255 49.72981317 60.98447255
Training Days 10.17857143 2.227674098 4.569147452 0.001827832 5.041545746 15.31559711 5.041545746 15.31559711
Dog ID Breed Training Days Behavior Scores
1 Golden Doodle 0 50
2 Shepherd Inu 1 65
3 Cockapoo 0 50
4 Yorkie 2 70
5 Labrador 1 75
6 Pitbull 0 55
7 Shih Tzu 1 70
8 Beagle 2 75
9 Bulldog 1 65
10 Cavapoo 0 60
• The Multiple R of 0.85 indicates a strong positive linear relationship between Training Days and Past Behavioral Scores.
• R Square of 0.72 suggests that approximately 72% of the variability in the behavioral score can be explained by the number of training days.
• The ANOVA results are statistically significant (p = 0.0018), supporting the overall effectiveness of the regression model.
• Coefficients show a positive relationship, indicating that each additional training day is associated with an increase of 10.18 points in the behavioral
score.
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Past Behavior Scores

5. REGRESSION ANALYSIS: PRESENT BEHAVIORAL SCORES
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.807483297
R Square 0.652029275
Adjusted R Square 0.608532934
Standard Error 7.381000384
Observations 10
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 816.6666667 816.6666667 14.99043977 0.004729632
Residual 8 435.8333333 54.47916667
Total 9 1252.5
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 50.16666667 6.462767295 7.762412659 5.42163E-05 35.26349856 65.06983477 35.26349856 65.06983477
Training Days 11.66666667 3.013280789 3.871748929 0.004729632 4.718028708 18.61530463 4.718028708 18.61530463
Dog ID Breed Training Days Behavior Scores
1 Golden Doodle 1 55
2 Shepherd Inu 3 90
3 Cockapoo 2 60
4 Yorkie 2 75
5 Labrador 3 85
6 Pitbull 1 60
7 Shih Tzu 1 75
8 Beagle 3 85
9 Bulldog 2 75
10 Cavapoo 2 75
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Present Behavior Scores
• The Multiple R of 0.85 indicates a strong positive linear relationship between Training Days and Past Behavioral Scores.
• R Square of 0.72 suggests that approximately 72% of the variability in the behavioral score can be explained by the number of training days.
• The ANOVA results are statistically significant (p = 0.0018), supporting the overall effectiveness of the regression model.
• Coefficients show a positive relationship, indicating that each additional training day is associated with an increase of 10.18 points in the behavioral score

6. INSIGHTS FROM QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Cockapoo
•Owner
Frustration:
Expresses
frustration with
Novice training
using Clicker
Training.
•Vet
Recommendati
on: Suggest
assessing
individual
temperament
for a
customized
approach,
focusing on
specific stimuli
responses.
Shih Tzu
•Progress
Satisfaction:
Pleased with
Intermediate-
level training
progress.
•Vet
Recommendati
on:
Recommends
occasional
variations in
training
environments,
introducing
puzzle toys for
continued
interest.
Golden
Doodle
•Distraction
Challenges:
Faces
challenges with
Novice-level
training due to
distractions.
•Vet
Recommendati
on: Suggests
incorporating
interactive
toys, short
engaging
sessions, and
pairing positive
reinforcement
with treats for
focus
improvement.
Yorkie
•Progress with
Challenges:
Pleased with
Intermediate-
level Mixed
Methods but
faces
occasional
stubbornness.
•Vet
Recommendati
on:
Acknowledges
intelligence,
suggests short
engaging
activities and
consistent
rewards for
overcoming
challenges.
Labrador
•Remarkable
Progress:
Observes
remarkable
progress with
Mixed Methods
at the
Advanced level.
•Vet
Recommendati
on: Suggest
joint activities
like obedience
competitions
and fetch to
strengthen the
owner-labrador
bond.
Cavapoo
•Successful
Sessions: Notes
successful
Intermediate-
level Positive
Reinforcement
training.
•Vet
Recommendati
on: Advises
short, frequent
sessions,
emphasizing
consistency
and positive
reinforcement.
Pitbull
•Slow Progress
Concern:
Owner
expresses
concern about
slower
progress in
Novice
training.
Vet
Recommendati
on: Advocates
patience,
gradual
exposure, and
potential
adjustments to
address
specific fears or
anxieties.
Beagle
•Clicker Training
Success:
Achieved
success with
Clicker Training
at the
Advanced level.
•Vet
Recommendati
on: Suggests
adding Positive
Reinforcement
for a diversified
approach,
catering to the
Beagle's
curiosity.
Shepherd Inu
•Owner
Satisfaction:
Delighted with
Advanced-level
Positive
Reinforcement
training.
•Vet
Recommendati
on: Commends
effective
methods, and
advises
incorporating
mental
stimulation
activities for
ongoing
engagement.
Bulldog
•Positive
Changes:
Observe
positive
behavior
changes with
Mixed Methods
training.
•Vet
Recommendati
on: Encourages
consistency,
and
emphasizes
monitoring
stress levels for
optimized
outcomes.
Insights:
• Individual temperament plays a crucial role in training
effectiveness.
• Mixed Methods and Positive Reinforcement are effective, but
customization is key.
• Consistency, patience, and gradual exposure are crucial for
success.
• Incorporating mental stimulation and interactive elements
enhances engagement.
• Tailored recommendations contribute to a positive training
experience for each dog.

7. ANOVA ANALYSIS: IMPACT OF PAST TRAINING
 The ANOVA results indicate a significant difference in success rates
between dogs with Intermediate and Novice past training levels.
 The F-statistic of 20.88 is above the critical value, suggesting that the
difference is not due to random chance.
 The p-value of 0.0018 is less than the significance level (commonly 0.05),
confirming the statistical significance of the observed difference.
 This implies that past training levels had a notable impact on the success
rates of the dogs in the study.
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 580.1785714 580.1785714 20.87710843 0.001827832
Residual 8 222.3214286 27.79017857
Total 9 802.5
Average of Success Rate Past Levels
Row Labels Intermediate Novice
Beagle 75
Bulldog 65
Cavapoo 60
Cockapoo 50
Golden Doodle 50
Labrador 75
Pitbull 55
Shepherd Inu 65
Shih Tzu 70
Yorkie 70
Grand Total 72.5 57.5

8. ANOVA ANALYSIS: IMPACT OF PRESENT TRAINING
 The ANOVA analysis indicates a significant difference in
success rates between Advanced, Intermediate, and Novice
training levels (p-value = 0.0047).
 The F-value of 14.99 is above the critical value, suggesting
that the variance between the groups is larger than the
variance within the groups.
 This significant result implies that the training levels have a
meaningful impact on the success rates of the dogs.
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 816.6666667 816.6666667 14.99043977 0.004729632
Residual 8 435.8333333 54.47916667
Total 9 1252.5
Average of Success Rate ImprovedLevels
Row Label Advanced Intermediate Novice
Beagle 85
Bulldog 75
Cavapoo 75
Cockapoo 60
Golden Doodle 55
Labrador 85
Pitbull 60
Shepherd Inu 90
Shih Tzu 75
Yorkie 75
GrandTotal 86.67 75 58.33

9. AVERAGE SUCCESS RATES BASED ON PAST/PRESENT TRAINING
Average of Success Rate Past Levels
Row Labels Intermediate Novice Grand Total
Beagle 75 75
Bulldog 65 65
Cavapoo 60 60
Cockapoo 50 50
Golden Doodle 50 50
Labrador 75 75
Pitbull 55 55
Shepherd Inu 65 65
Shih Tzu 70 70
Yorkie 70 70
Grand Total 72.5 57.5 63.5
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Beagle
Bulldog
Cavapoo
Cockapoo
Golden Doodle
Labrador
Pitbull
Shepherd Inu
Shih Tzu
Yorkie
Intermediate
Novice
Average of Success Rate Present Levels
Row Label Advanced Intermediate Novice Grand Total
Beagle 85 85
Bulldog 75 75
Cavapoo 75 75
Cockapoo 60 60
Golden Doodle 55 55
Labrador 85 85
Pitbull 60 60
Shepherd Inu 90 90
Shih Tzu 75 75
Yorkie 75 75
Grand Total 86.67 75 58.33 73.5
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Beagle
Bulldog
Cavapoo
Cockapoo
Golden Doodle
Labrador
Pitbull
Shepherd Inu
Shih Tzu
Yorkie
Advanced
Intermediate
Novice
Past
Present

10. RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Designing Personalized Training Programs
• Tailor to Breed Characteristics: Recognize and accommodate the unique characteristics of each breed, considering size, temperament, and historical use.
• Varied Approaches: What works for one breed may not work for another. Design training programs that incorporate a variety of techniques to find what resonates
best with each dog.
2. Continuous Assessment and Adaptation
• Individualized Progress Tracking: Regularly assess each dog's response to training, adapting methods as needed.
• Flexibility is Key: Dogs respond differently; being flexible in training approaches ensures optimal success.
3. Ethical Considerations
• Prioritize Positive Reinforcement: Make positive reinforcement and humane training methods the cornerstone of all programs.
• Avoid Harmful Techniques: Steer clear of methods that may cause distress or harm to the dog. Ethical considerations should guide every aspect of the training
process.
4. Promoting Socialization
• Early Exposure: Encourage early socialization by exposing dogs to various environments, people, and other animals.
• Well-Rounded Dogs: Socialization contributes to well-rounded, well-behaved dogs capable of adapting to diverse situations.
Key Takeaways:
• Customization: One size does not fit all; customize training programs to
individual needs.
• Adaptability: Regularly assess and adjust training methods based on individual
progress and needs.
• Ethical Training: Prioritize positive reinforcement and avoid harmful techniques.
• Socialization Matters: Early and ongoing socialization contributes to a well-
behaved and adaptable dog.

11. CONCLUSION
Summary of Key Findings:
Effective and humane
dog training methods
vary across breeds and
individual variability.
The cross-tabulation
analysis revealed a
distribution of training
levels among different
breeds.
Regression analyses
showed a strong
positive correlation
between training days
and both past and
present behavioral
scores.
The thematic analysis
provided insights from
dog owners and vet
recommendations,
emphasizing the
importance of tailored
training approaches.

12. Q&A
Inviting Questions and Discussions:
 Any questions, thoughts, or discussions from the audience are welcomed.
 Please feel free to share your perspectives on the findings or inquire about specific aspects of the study.
 Your input is valuable in fostering a deeper understanding of effective and humane dog training methods.
Thank You for Your Attention!
 I appreciate your participation and look forward to engaging with your inquiries.