ethnol project report sample (banking).pdf

EIA Consultant:
Vasantdada Sugar Institute, Manjari (Bk), Pune 412 307
NABET Accreditation No.: NABET/EIA/1720/SA106
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAREANCE PRESENTATION
for
Project: New 45 KLPD Molasses Based Distillery
Project Proponent:
M/s. Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,
Sonajinagar, Sawargaon Tq. Majalgaon, Dist: Beed
Maharashtra-431131

2
Project at a Glance
Proposal No.:
Date of EC Application Submission
EDS by SEIAA
Date of Acceptance
New Project New 45 KLPD Molasses based distillery unit
Product Mix or Change in Technology NA
Existing & Proposed Capacity Proposed 45 KLPD
Forest Area/Wildlife/ESZ if any NA
Applied for ToR 21 May 2019
ToR Granted 27 May 2019
ToR Proposal No.: IA/MH/IND2/105978/2019

3
Project at a Glance
Date of Public Hearing (P.H.) Conducted Dec 11, 2020
Level of Officer conducted P.H.
District Magistrate and Regionalofficer
and Sub regionalofficer
Applicability of Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) if
any
NA
Whether located in Critically Polluted Area (CPA). No
Certified Compliance submitted NA
Details of EIA consultant
Name of EIACoordinator Dr. Deepali Nimbalkar
Consultant Name Vasantdada Sugar Institute, Manjari (Bk), Pune 412307
NABET Accreditation No. NABET/EIA/1720/SA 106
Validity 14 June 2021

4
Introduction of the Project
Brief Description about project New 45 KLPD Molasses based distillery unit proposedby M/s.
Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar karkhana Ltd.
Address At Survey No.: 28/1, 30/1, 31/2, 32/1, 32/2, 33/1, 36/4, 37,
38/1,38/2, 41/1, 41/2,70,71, Sonajinagar, Sawargaon Tq. Majalgaon,
Dist. Beed, Maharashtra 431 131
Plot area 24,310 sq. m
% of green belt provided ~ 34 %
Land use change required NA (Land is already non-agriculture)
Sources of Air (+Noise) Pollution Boiler, TG set,fuel and ash handling, fermentationprocess etc.
Estimated Project Cost Rs. 7359.59 Lakhs
EMP Cost Rs. 7286.72 Lakhs
CER Cost Rs. 73 Lakhs
Manpower Direct employment to 98 persons

5
Introduction of the Project
Water Consumption/day 410 cu.m/day(consideringrecycle and reuse)
Source of water Majalgaon dam (permission from Irrigation Dept)
Permission from CGWA or
any other agency
NA
Energy Consumption
1.3 MW
Source: Proposed1.5 MW TG set (captive)
Kind of Fuel used
Conc. Spent wash, Coal/Baggasse
Quantity of fuelused
Conc. Spent wash: 60 TPD and Coal: Max. 29.68 TPD OrBagasse:
53.95 TPD
Waste Water
Generated/day
Sewage generation7-8Cum/ Day
EffluentTreatment facility
For spent wash: Multi-effect evaporation followed by
incineration
For spent lees, condensate of MEE and other effluent:
Condensate polishing unit – treated water will be reused for
molasses dilution or cooling tower make and for watering
greenbelt plants
Mode of discharge Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) will be achieved

6
Location of the Proposed Project
Project
coordinates:
1. 190
11’17.09” N
760
07’14.44” E
2. 190
11’21.84” N
760
07’15.49” E
3. 190
11’22.57” N
760
07’10.04” E
4. 19011’20.09” N
76007’09.46” E
5. 190
11’19.68” N
760
07’11.27” E
6. 19011’18.46” N
760
07’11.06” E
Latitude 19011’17.09” N to 19011’18.46”
N
Longitude 76007’14.44” E to 76007’11.06”
E.
Elevation 468 m
Highway NH 222: Nirmal Kalyan~ 0.5km
Nearest
Town
Majalgaon ~10 km
Railway
Station
Manvat road ~ 60 km
Air Port Aurangabad ~140 km
Seismicity Seismic Zone- III

Topographical Map
7
Project Site
Particular
Particular
Distance and
Direction
Water bodies
Sindhaphana
River 5.0 Km S
Kesapuri lake 7.0 Km E
Majalgaon dam
Backwater 3.5 km S
Forest
Naigaon peacock
sanctuary
70 Km SW
Densely populated area
Majalgaon 10 Km SE

8
Satellite Image of the Proposed Site

9
Engineering layout of the Project site

11
Facet In brief
Climate Hot and dry
Rainfall An average annual rainfall of 666 mm (Average for 2013-2017 years)
Rains are receivedmainlyduring June-Septembermonths
Temperature The maximum temperature insummer is around 41°C and minimum
temperature inwinter is around 18°C.
Humidity The relative maximum humidityranges between 80 to 88% in the month of
August and minimum humidity ranges from 30-40% in the months of February
Wind Predominantlywind direction North-east during studyperiod
Air Quality Complies NAAQ standards of Nov. 2009 at all monitoredlocations
Noise Complies the standard
Ground water As per Central Ground Water Board report 2014 -
Good and suitable for drinking and irrigationpurpose,however localized nitrate
contaminationis observed.
Soil Rocky and thin layeredsoils except onthe banks of Godavari and Sina Rivers.
Environmental features of study area

12
For baseline data collection sampling of air, water and soil was
carried out in Oct 2018 To Jan 2019
Monitoring Location Map
# Location
Distance
(km)and
Direction
Parameters (Sample collected
for)
1 Project site ----
GW (Well), Soil, Noise
(Industrial), AA
2 Hirki Nimgaon 2.5, SW
GW (BW), Soil,Noise(rural
residential), AA
3 Mangrul No. 1 3.0, S
GW (HP), Surface Water, Soil,
Noise (rural residential), AA
4
Rampimpalgao
n
3.0, SW
GW (Well), Soil, Noise (rural
residential), AA
5 Sawargaon 2.0, E
GW (HP), Soil, Noise
(Commercial), AA
6 Pargaon 3.5, NW GW (BW), Soil,Noise, AA
7 Paitalwadi 3.0, NE
GW (Well), Surface Water(Lake),
Soil, Noise (rural residential), AA
8 Jaykochiwadi 4.5, NW
GW (BW), Surface Water(Lake),
Soil, Noise (rural residential), AA
9 Wadgaon 9.5, E GW (BW), Surface Water(Lake)
10 Kesapuri 7.5, E
Surface Water(lake/pond),
Surface Water(Lake), Surface
Water(Majalgaon reservoir)
11
Phule
Pimpalgaon
6.0, E Surface Water(Lake)

13
Potential factors/ Source Cause
Preventive /control and mitigation
measures
Burning of spent wash and
coal or bagasse in
incineration boiler to
produce process steam
Main pollutant-
PM, SO2, NOx,
CO/CO2
• ProposedStack height 65 m
• ESP as air pollution controlequipment
• Greenbelt development for proposedunit
Handling of coal/bagasse
and ash
Fugitive dust Mechanized system for coal/bagasse and ash
handling
Comprised of closed conveyors,
foggers/sprinklers (for coal yard), bag filters
(for coal handling), transportation of ash in
covered vehicles
Vehicular movement Particulate matter,
NO2, HC
Tree plantation along internal roads, internal
roads will be maintained properly
FermentationUnit Fermentationunit:
(CO2)
Fermenters will be covered, CO2 scrubbed in
water
Storage of molasses, spent
wash and fermentation
process
Odour pollution
due to storage
All the effluent will be properly treated and
utilized/disposed withinthe premises
Separate tanks for storage of raw and
concentrated s/w.
Storage of spentwash in impervious tanks
which will be as per CREP guidelines
Development of greenbelt
Air Environment

Ambient air quality Results
14
Project site
Harki
Nimgaon
Mangrul No.
1
Rampimpal
gaon
Sawargaon Pargaon Paitalwadi
Jaykochiwa
di
Minimum 56.23 52.84 45.54 58.01 62.52 42.54 50.56 53.56
Average 62.02 59.5 48.49 61.7 65.74 55.64 53.93 55.86
98 Percentile 64.78 64.07 50.84 65.32 68.54 61.59 58.59 57.51
Maximum 64.85 64.12 51.25 65.85 68.74 62.25 59.45 57.54
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Concentration
(µg/m3)
Monitoring Locations
PM10 Graph

15
Project Site
Harki
Nimgaon
Mangrul
No. 1
Rampimpal
gaon
Jaykochiwa
di
Minimum 27.21 23.17 19.95 18.51 14.75 24.95 22.52 20.13
Average 28.51 24.79 21.42 20.23 17.78 25.77 25.68 23.12
98 Percentage 29.41 27.64 24.79 22.91 21.64 26.56 27.47 26.1
Maximum 29.47 28.21 25.54 23.52 21.81 26.6 27.6 26.21
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Concentration
(µg/m3)
PM2.5 Graph

16
Project Site
Harki
Nimgaon
Mangrul
No. 1
Rampimpal
gaon
Jaykochiwa
di
Minimum 27.85 30.01 21.6 22.6 32.6 20.6 20.6 21.6
Average 32.6 31.43 27.03 27.96 38.03 26.03 26.03 27.03
98 Percentile 35.95 33.83 30.73 31.73 41.73 29.73 29.73 30.73
Maximum 36.5 34.25 30.84 31.86 41.84 29.84 29.84 30.84
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Concentration
(µg/m3)
NOx Graph

17
Project site
Harki
Nimgaon
Mangrul No.
1
Rampimpal
gaon
Jaykochiwad
i
Minimum 16.35 18.15 12.35 14.35 15.35 12.35 13.35 12.35
Average 21.38 20.78 17.38 19.38 20.38 17.38 18.38 17.38
98 Percentile 26.308 24.9 22.3 24.3 25.31 22.31 23.3 22.3
Maximum 26.5 25.14 22.5 24.5 25.5 22.5 23.5 22.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Concentration
(µg/m3)
SOx Graph

19
Dispersion Modeling Study
Isoplethsshowing incrementalground levelconcentrationof particulate matter
(Short Term 24 Hourly)

20
Dispersion Modeling Study
Isopleth showing GLC location and distance for SO2 (Short term 24 hourly)

21
Summary of Maximum 24-hour GLC due to proposed
project
Description
Concentrationµg/m3
PM SO2
Maximum rise in GLC 0.786 3.80
Directionof Occurrence and distance W (0.7 km) W (0.7 km)
Coordinates ofmaximum GLC (agriculture land) Lat: 190.18’92”72
Long: 76011’50”42
Lat: 19o18’92”72
Long: 76011’50”42
Baseline ambient air concentrationreported
nearby GLC (at 1.21 km W)
59.50 20.78
Projectedincremental load at village Kodni 59.6 21.78
Total Concentration(Post project scenario) PM10 100 80
NAAQS 0.786 3.80
*The distance is measured from stack to the maximum GLC

22
Noise Environment
Potential factor Preventive controland mitigation measures
•Boiler
•STG andplant machinery
(crusher,conveyer,etc.)
•Handlingof ash and DG
set
•Boiler and STG will be withinindustrialshed (covered
area)and therefore,noise will get confined.
•An areaof STG will be barricadedtoreducethe noise
levels.
•Equipmentto be maintainedby oiling and/orgreasing
•Installing machinesand equipment’sof standardmake
as well as using sparepartsof standardmake
(complyingwithIS or othernational/international
standard)
•By providingpaddingat variouslocationsto avoid
rattlingdue to vibration
•Providingnoise proofcabinsto operators

23
Noise Monitoring Results
# Location Results (Avg. levelin dB(A) National Standard (dB(A)
Day time Night time Day time Night time
Industrial Area
1. Project site 60.4 53.1 75 70
Commercial Area
2. Sawargaon 53.6 41.2 65 55
Residential area (Rural)
3. Mangrul No. 1 51.3 42.2
55 45
4. Rampimpalgaon 49.9 41.2
5. Harki Nimgaon 49.8 40.3
6. Pargaon 48.2 41
7. Paitalwadi 48 40.3
8. Jaykochiwadi 45.3 41.7

24
Potential factors/
Source
Cause
Preventive controland mitigation
measures
Spent wash pH, COD, BOD,
Temperature,
TDS, TSS,
Sulphur,Chloride
Raw spent wash will be concentrated in
standalone Multi effect evaporation;
Conc. spent wash of >55-60% solids will
be burntin incinerationboiler
Treated in CPU; comprised of primary
treatment of effluent followed by aeration
as secondary treatment and tertiary
treatment
Hot water recycledafter cooling
Spent lees, condensate
from MEE and Other
effluent
Sewage: Domestic
wastewater
As locally acceptable practice, by septic
tank and soak pit system
Water Environment

Characteristics of surface water sources from the study area
Parameters Unit
Nipani
(Jawahar
lake)
Khadakewada
(Chikotra river)
Budihal
(Chikotra
river)
Chikli
(Vedganga
river)
Jatrat
(Vedganga
river)
Limits as per
IS
10500:2012
pH at 25oC -- 7.7 7.9 7.8 7.6 7.21 6.5 to 8.5
EC@ 25o C
mmhos/
cm
0.271 0.125 0.168 0.193 0.193 -
COD mg/l 20.00 28.00 26.00 24.00 28.00 -
BOD at 27oC for
3 days
mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL 6.2 -
DO mg/l 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.4 -
Total solids mg/l 196.00 138.00 132.00 142.00 140.00 -
TDS mg/l 168.00 120.00 110.00 120.00 120.00 <500
TSS mg/l 16.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 14.00 -
Total Hardness mg/l 95.00 53.00 67.00 81.00 85.00 <200
Calcium mg/l 21.64 14.42 18.43 23.24 23.24 <75
Magnesium mg/l 9.96 4.13 5.10 5.58 6.56 <30
Chlorides mg/l 20.49 10.49 12.99 10.49 13.49 -
Sulphate mg/l 16.19 6.85 9.80 11.42 10.85 <200
phosphate mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
25

Parameters Unit
Nipani
(Jawahar
lake)
Khadakewada
(Chikotra river)
Budihal
(Chikotra
river)
Chikli
(Vedganga
river)
Jatrat
(Vedganga
river)
Limits as per
IS
10500:2012
Silica mg/l 4.32 3.25 4.59 9.21 3.12 -
Total alkalinity mg/l 105.00 55.00 60.00 80.00 75.00 -
Sodium mg/l 13 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 -
Potassium mg/l 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 -
Residual Chlorine mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Min. 0.2
Nitrate nitrogen as
NO3
mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
Fluroid mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
Copper mg/l BDL 0.825 2.015 BDL 1.375 0.05
Cadmium mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.003
Chromium mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.05
Nickel mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.02
Iron mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.3
Zinc mg/l BDL 0.138 0.182 BDL 0.161 5
Manganese mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.1
Lead mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.01
Characteristics of surface water sources from the study area
BDL value forCOD = <10 mg/L; BOD = <5mg/L; Calcium = <5 mg/L; Magnesium= <5 mg/L; Phosphate=
<0.1mg/L; Sulphate= <1 mg/L
26

Characteristics of ground water sources from the study area
Parameters
Units
Project
Site
(Well
Water)
Padihal
(Bore
well)
Lingnur
(Well
Water)
Nagnur
(Well
Water)
Nipani
(Well
Water)
Yamgarni
(Well
Water)
Kodni
(Well
Water)
Lakhanpur
(Bore
well)
Limits
as
per
IS
10500:
2012
pH at 25o C -- 7.8 7.2 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.2 7.05 8.1 6.5 to 8.5
EC@ 25o C
mmhos
/cm
0.769 0.698 0.487 0.858 0.680 0.983 0.944 0.454 -
COD mg/l 16.00 18.00 16.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 16.00 18.00 -
BOD3 @ 27oC mg/l BDL 5.61 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
DO mg/l 3.4 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.0 3.6 -
Total solids mg/l 506.00 490.00 432.00 472.00 448.00 532.00 528.00 302.00 <500
TDS mg/l 486.00 472.00 418.00 456.00 420.00 516.00 510.00 282.00 -
TSS mg/l 16.00 18.00 18.00 16.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 16.00 <200
Total Hardness mg/l 89.00 173.00 159.00 231.00 119.00 315.00 323.00 129.00 <200
Calcium mg/l 35.27 51.30 22.44 72.94 33.66 64.92 72.94 21.64 <75
Magnesium mg/l 0.243 10.93 25.02 11.90 8.5 37.17 34.26 18.22 <75
27

Parameters
Units
Project
Site
(Well
Water)
Padihal
(Bore
well)
Lingnur
(Well
Water)
Nagnur
(Well
Water)
Nipani
(Well
Water)
Yamgarni
(Well
Water)
Kodni
(Well
Water)
Lakhanpur
(Bore
well)
Limits
as
per
IS
10500:
2012
Chlorides mg/l 74.47 69.47 51.48 118.46 64.97 60.98 105.46 43.48 250
Sulphate mg/l 79.04 49.61 25.33 59.42 16.00 52.19 69.14 36.66 <30
Phosphate mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
Silica mg/l 5.03 8.74 4.74 7.25 5.33 5.77 5.48 7.40 -
Total Alkalinity mg/l 130.00 115.00 135.00 120.00 115.00 210.00 125.00 105.00 200
Sodium mg/l 100.00 56.00 26.00 50.00 36.00 95.00 38.00 22.00 -
Potassium mg/l 0.5 0.5 4.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.4 -
Residual
chloride
mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
Nitrate
nitrogen as
NO3
mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
Fluoride mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -
28

Parameters
Units
Project
Site
(Well
Water)
Padihal
(Bore
well)
Lingnur
(Well
Water)
Nagnur
(Well
Water)
Nipani
(Well
Water)
Yamgarni
(Well
Water)
Kodni
(Well
Water)
Lakhanpur
(Bore
well)
Limits
as
per
IS
10500:
2012
Copper mg/l BDL BDL 1.135 1.463 BDL 2.24 1.64 BDL 0.01
Cadmium mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.003
Chromium mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.963 BDL BDL 0.05
Nickel mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.02
Iron mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.05
Zinc mg/l BDL BDL 0.153 0.177 BDL 0.254 0.310 0.141 5
Manganese mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.175 0.1
Lead mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.01
BDL value forCOD = <10 mg/L; BOD = <5mg/L; Calcium = <5mg/L; Magnesium = <5 mg/L;
Phosphate= <0.1mg/L; Sulphate= <1 mg/L
29

Characteristics
Units
Project
Site
Padalihal
Lakhanpur
Kodni
Nagnur
Yamgarani
Shirpewadi
Jatrat
pH -- 7.9 8.0 7.3 7.8 7.5 8.0 7.8 7.5
EC
mhos/c
m
0.36 0.23 0.13 0.40 0.12 0.21 0.15 0.16
Organic
Matter
% 0.91 0.71 0.31 0.53 0.62 0.58 0.57 0.84
Organic
Carbon
% 1.58 1.23 0.53 0.91 1.07 1.014 0.98 1.45
Moisture % 19.16 19.15 17.37 19.56 17.64 16.58 17.64 18.49
Nitrogen
kg/ha 100.35 159.93 150.52 158.9 147.39 156.8 112.89 134.84
Phosphate kg/ha 8.25 3.819 6.01 15.72 6.71 17.29 9.30 5.62
Potassium
kg/ha 400 900 650 210 330 800 260 950
Soil analysis results
30

Financial provision for CER activities planned for next five years
(Social Action plan)
31
Activity head Year Budgetary provision
(Rs. in lakhs)
1st 2nd
Provision of Water/water storage
Distribution of water tanks to poor/needy people
7 8 15
Water and fodder facility for cattle 4 4 8
Health checkup camps 1.5 2 3.5
Plantation activity 5 7 12
Education/training to local youths, farmers, family
members of employee’s
2 3 05
Other activities for maintaining social and cultural
harmony, sports events, aid to needy people
2 2.5 4.5
Provision for accommodation, drinking water and
sanitation of cane harvesting families
12 13 25
TOTAL BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
(1% of the capital budget = Rs. 73)
73

32
RISK STUDIES & DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Environmental
Aspect
Impact causing factor Control/Mitigation Measures
Risk and disaster
management
Fire, accidents,
earthquake, etc.
 The entire premises will be declared as ‘no
smoking zone’
 Lightening arresting system will be installed
 Ethanol vapor condensing system will be
installed at storage area
 Proper storage of molasses,ethanoland coal
 Ethanol storage as per PESO guidelines
 Firefighting system as per OISD and local
authority guidelines
 Earthquake resistant construction

33
MolassesStorage (MS)tank
Molassesweighedand diluted
Fermentation
Yeast propagatewithmolasses
in sterilize separatevessel
Distillation
• Analyzer column
• PR Column
• RE Column
• Exhaustcolumn
• Reboiler
Spentwash/Spentlees
CO2 Scrubber
RS/ENA/AA
(ethanol)&
Fusel oil
Yeast sludge
to sludge
drying bed
Process Flow Chart

Water Balance
34
Particulars Cu.m./day
A. PROCESS INPUT WATER
For molasses dilution 497
For cooling towermakeup 292
For vacuum pump cooling 15
For fusel oil decanter& Alcohol scrubber 15
Boiler feed water (@15TPH) 360
Others (Domestic) 10
Total Water Input at start-up 1189
B. OUTPUT WATER
Spent Lees (PR & Rect. ) 90
Process condensate 270
From vacuum pump cooling 15
Boiler steam condensate 324
Cooling tower blow down 75
Boiler blow down 5
WTP reject 15

Water balance…
35
C. WATER LOSS
Domestic loss 10
Cooling tower drift loss 276
For fusel oil decanter & Alcohol scrubber 15
Over all process loss 95
Total Loss 395
D. WATER AVAILABLE FOR RECIRCULATION
Spent Lees (PR &Rect) 90
Process condensate recycle to process after CPU treatment 270
Boiler blow down 5
Boiler steam condensate recycle back to boiler as a feed water 324
Cooling tower blow down 75
WTP reject 15
Total water available for recirculation 779
Net fresh water requirement per lit of RS 1189 -779/45= 9.11 9.11 L/L of RS
Summary of water balance
Fresh water requirement
= Water input – water recycle
= 1189 – 779 = 410
Net fresh requirement = 441m3/day= 410/45 = 9.11 lit/lit RS
Net fresh water required over the year = 410 X 330 = 1,35,300 m3 per annum
The Mill has water drawl permission Executive Engineer Irrigation department, Aurangabad for water drawl from Majalgaon dam.

WaterRequirementand its approval
 Daily water requirement - 410 m3/day
 Source of water- Majalgaon dam,
Irrigation Dept
 Water drawl permissionavailable:1.45
lakh cubic meter
36

 Unloading of coal by dumpers will be carried out with proper care to avoiddropping of materials from
height. Also, coal will be kept moist by sprinkling water while unloading at the project site.
 In case of non-availabilityof dumpers, it will be done in trucks coveredwith tarpaulin sheets.The coal will
be kept moist in order to prevent the fugitive emissions during transportation.
 Blowing wind will cause fugitive emissions inthe coal storage area.The same will be preventedby keeping
it in coveredarea and sprinkling water as and when requiredwith auto-sprinklers.
 Crushing and screening operationwill be carried out in closed area.
 Centralized de dusting facility (collectionhood and suctionarrangement) followed by de dusting unit like
jet pulse bag filter will be placed
37
Coal handling system

Productwise Availabilityof raw materialsand modeof transport
38
Particulars Estimatedquantity Source market Final product Estimated
quantity
Transport
mode
Raw Material
Molasses
49,500
TPA (B Heavy) Or
55,110
TPA (C
heavy)
Own mill – up to 40,800
B heavy molasses OR
27,200 tons C heavy
and remaining
will be purchased from
nearby sugar mills
Rectified spirit +
Impure spirit (5%)OR
ENA +Impure spirit (6
%)
OR Fuel Alcohol/ ethanol +
Impure spirit(5%)
45 KLPD
RM as well as
goods
by Road- through
Tanker
Chemicals
Nutrients N, P 150 Kg/day Beed, Majalgaon or any
suitable place
- - By Road-Truck
Turkey Red Oil
(TRO)
225 Kg/day - - By Road-Truck

39
Ecology and Biodiversity
Potential factor Preventive controland mitigation measures
• Treecutting/ removalof
vegetationbythe project
• Threatto rare,endangered
flora and faunadue to
projectand allied activities
• Disturbancetowildlife due
to projectand all allied
activities
• Pollutiongeneratedfrom
the project
• No tree cutting/failing involvedsince projectis on
barrenland
• No wildlife sanctuary, national park or biosphere
reserve within 10km radius, site is not in migratory
route of any wildlife, no rare and endangered species of
plants/animalsreportedfromthe region
• Use of local/nativespeciesfor greenbeltdevelopment
• Use of treatedwater for wateringgreenbeltplantswill
savefreshwaterresource
• Safe disposalof solid waste,particularlyash
• Adequatemeasurestoprevent,controlandmitigate
air, waterand noise pollution

40
Photographs of Existing Greenbelt

41
Greenbelt Development
• Existing greenbeltis spread over an areaof approx. 20 acres.
• In the proposed activity, land allocated for greenbelt development is
approximately1.5 acres.
• Greenbelt will be preferentially of local species; developed around the
periphery of the process area, waste disposal areas, such as CPU, ash pond,
spent wash holding tanks, etc.
• Treated water from sugar mill and distillery CPU will used for watering
purpose

42
List of recommended species for green belt
# Name Size* &canopy Climaticcondition(Rainfall) Feature/remark
1 Dalbargiasissoo(Shisoo) T -Round 500-1000 mm Tolerant to airpollution,common in the region
2 Acacia leucophloea(Babhul) T -spreading 300-1000 mm Tolerant to airpollution,very common in the region
3 Delonixregia (Gulmohar) T -Spreading 250-500 mm Fly ash tolerant
4 Azadiractaindica(Neem) T- Round 500-1000 mm Fly ash tolerant ,Tolerant of alkaline and Saline soil,
common in the area
5 Albizialebbak (Shiris) M- Round 500-1000 mm Tolerant ofCO2
6 Tamarindusindica (Chinch) T- Spreading 250-500 mm Tolerant ofacidicsoil
7 Emblicaofficinalis M- Conical 500-1000 mm -
8 Derris indica (Karanj) T-Round 500-1500mm Tolerant to airpollution,common in the region
9 Casurinaequisetifolia (Suru) T -Oblong 500-1000mm Tolerant ofsandy soil
10 Tectonagrandis (Saag) T-Oblong 500-1000mm Dust tolerant
11 Polyalthialongifolia (Asopalav T-Conical 600 – 2600mm Dust tolerant and ornamental
12 Terminalia arjuna T -Oblong 500-1000mm Tolerant ofalkaline/Saline soil
13 Samaniasaman T- Spreading 600 – 1000mm Dust tolerant

43
List of recommended species for green belt
# Name Size* &canopy Climaticcondition(Rainfall) Feature/remark
14 Anonasquamosa T- Oblong 250-500 mm Fly ash tolerant
15 Aegalmarmalose T- Round 500-1000 mm Tolerant to air pollution, common
in the region
16 Magiferaindica (Mango) T - Spreading 500-1000 mm Dust tolerant
17 Ficusbengalensis(wad) T - Spreading 250-1000 mm Dust tolerant
18 Ficusreligiosa (Peepal) T - Round 250-1000 mm Dust tolerant
19 Thespesiapopulania(Ran bhindi) T - Round 250-1000 mm Dust tolerant
20 Holipteliaintegrifolia(Papadi) M - Oblong 500-1000 mm Dust tolerant
21 Callistemon lanceolata
(Bottle brush )
M - Conical 500-1000 mm Dust tolerant
22 Putranjivaroxburghai T- Conical 500-1000 mm Tolerant to airpollution,
23 Erythrinavarigata T - Oblong 500-1000 mm Tolerant to airpollution,
24 Malingtoniahortensis T - Conical 500-1000 mm Tolerant to airpollution,
25 Anthocephaluskadamba T - Oblong 500-1000 mm Tolerant to airpollution,

44
Environment Management
Environmental
Aspect
Impact causing factor Control/Mitigation Measures
Socio-economic
Environment
Rehabilitation and
Restoration (RR),
pressure on available
manmade
infrastructure/resource
due to population flux
 No rehabilitation and restoration issue involved
since site is already under the possession of
project proponent
 Local candidates will be preferred for
employment. Skilled work force is available at
nearby towns and cities
Safety and
Occupational
health
Accidents, improper work
practices
 Safety officerand safetycommittee will be
formulated
 Provisionof adequate safetygears
 Insurance policies as per statutoryrequirement
 Regular health check-up
Risk and disaster
management
Fire, accidents,
earthquake, etc.
 The entire premises will be declared as ‘no
smoking zone’
 Lightening arresting system will be installed
 Ethanol vapor condensing system will be
installed at storage area
 Proper storage of molasses,ethanoland coal
 Ethanol storage as per PESO guidelines
 Firefighting system as per OISD and local
authority guidelines
 Earthquake resistant construction

45
Capital Expenses for Environment Management
# Particulars
Amount
(Rs. in Lakhs)
1 Incinerationboiler with accessories, ESP, dump condenser 1600.00
2 Chimney for Boiler 76.00
3 Standalone spent wash evaporation (450 m3/dayfeed) 565.00
4 Condensate Polishing unit (civiland meachnical) 225.00
5 Coal storage andhandling system 60.00
6 Ash handling and storage system 100.00
7 Diesel generator 65.00
8 Coal Storage yard 50.00
9 Spent wash lagoons 30.00
10 Fire Fighting and safetyequipment 65.00
11 Greenbelt 25.00
TOTAL 2681
B.
Additional provision towards CSR/CER (1 % of capital
investment)
73

46
# Particulars
Amount
(Rs. in Lakhs)
1 Salaries and wages 29.36
2
Maintenance (@ 5% on capital investment of ~ Rs. 7300 lakhs) of
pollution control devices e.g. ESP, MEE,CPU units, etc.
365.00
3
Fuel (incineration activity) (@ base price of Rs. 4000/ton)
Diesel (incase of dieselgeneratoroperation)
396.00
42.00
4 Miscellaneous 05.00
TOTAL 837.36
Recurring Expenses for Environment Management

47
Overview of Environmentmanagement processes
# Waste product and source Treatment and disposal
1. Effluent/Wastewater
Spent wash Raw spent wash will be concentrated in standalone Multi effect
evaporation; Conc. spent wash of >55-60% solids will be burnt in
incineration boiler
Spent lees, condensate from MEE
and Other effluent
Treated in CPU; comprised of primary treatment of effluent followed by
aeration as secondary treatment and tertiary treatment
Hot water recycled after cooling
Sewage: Domestic wastewater As locally acceptable practice, by septic tank and soakpit system

48
3 Solid waste
Boilerash It will be sold to brickmanufacturer
Fermented sludge: Yeast sludge, CPU sludge The sludge from fermenter will be degradable, containing organic nutrient
and micro elements. It will be sent to sludge drying beds. Dried sludge will be
used as manure.
4 Hazardous waste –Spent/used oil, empty
containers and oil soakedcotton waste
Returned to supplier/ Given to authorizedrecycler
Overview of Environmentmanagement processes
2 Gaseous and dust emission
Flue gassesfrom boilers
Due to burning ofspent wash with coal
Particulate emissions will be controlled by ESP and then vented through a
stackofheight 65 m
Mechanized handling and transportation of bagasse, coal and ash (through
closed conveyors)
Greenbelt area proposedis 1.7 acres
Coal and ash handling Dust quenching and/or dust suppression system will be provided to control
fugitive dust from coal and ashhandling
Diesel generators It will be operational only when captive power supply failure, hence
emissionsanticipatedto be lessfrequent and minor
Fermentation unit: (CO2) Fermenters will be covered

TOR point wise compliance (Compiled in EIA Report)
49
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
1 Executive Summary
Prepared and bound separately and submitted along
with EIA report.
-
2
Details of the EIA Consultant
including NABET
accreditation
Vasantdada Sugar Institute Manjari (Bk), Pune,
Maharashtra-412307
Accredited by QCI/NABET; Certificate No.:
NABET/EIA/1720/SA 106
Cover page of the
report
3
Informationabout the
project proponent
It is proposed by a management of co-operative sugar
mill i.e.Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana limited.
It is registered vide registration no. BHR/MGN/PRG (A)
S-99-2000 dated 05/05/2000
Details are given in
Chapter I, Point no.
1.3, pg. 1-1
4
Importance and benefits of
the project
Ethanol is important bio-fuel to save import of crude oil.
Government of India is encouraging ethanol production
for Ethanol blended petrol programme.
Direct employment for 98 and indirect employment is
sizable
Chapter VIII Point No.
8.1 & 8.2, pg. 8-1.

505
Cost of project and time of
completion
Total project cost including EMP and
CER cost is Rs 7359.59 lakhs
Details are given in Chapter II,
Point No. 2.2, Table 2.1 pg. 2-2
And Chapter X, point 10.9 Table
10.8
6
Products with capacities for the
proposed project
RS/ENA/Ethanol and Impure spirit =
45 KLPD
Table No.2.1, pg. 2-2.
7
If expansion project, details of
existing products with capacities
and whether adequate land is
available for expansion, reference
of earlier EC if any
Not Applicable
This is new molasses-based distillery
unit of 45 KLPD capacity.
Adequate land is available in the
existing sugarmill premises.
This is a new 45 KLPD molasses
based distillery project.
8
List of raw materials required and
their source along with mode of
transportation
Raw material Molasses (From own
sugar unit) sugar cane from farmers
Fuel coal from market (road
transportation)
If bagasse used as fuel – it will be
sourced from own sugar mill
Please refer to Table No. 2.4, pg. 2-
7.
9
Other chemicals and materials
required Nutrients 150 kg/day and turkey red
oil 225 kg/day
30 days storage is planned
Please refer to Table No. 2.4, pg. 2-
7.
with quantities and storage
capacities

51
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
10. Details of Emission, effluents,
hazardous
waste generation and their
management
PM and SO2 from flue gasses – ESP proposed for
proposed incineration boiler
Dust from coal and ash handling, storage
transportation – dust control system, greenbelt
development, provisionof wind breaks
Effluent spent wash – disposal through multi-effect
evaporation followedby incineration
spent lees, process condensate and other wastewater
– treated in CPU and reused, Ash – Given to brick
mfg. unit, sludge – mixedinto soil
Point No. 2.6 & 2.7 pg. no 2-22
to 2-29, Table No. 2.10, pg. 2-
22, & table no. 2.14, pg. 2-29.
& Slide No. 13 to 17 of PPT
11. Requirement of water, power,
with source of supply, status of
approval, water balance diagram,
man-power requirement (regular
and contract)
Water requirement 410 m3/day (considering
recycle/reuse)
Water source is Majalgaon Dam.
Captive power of 1.3 MW
Man power requirement 98 regular
Point No. 2.3.2 to 2.3.5, pg. 2-8
to 2-12, and Point no. 2.3.10,
pg. 2-15 and Figure No. 2.3, pg.
2-11. 7 Slide not 5 of PPT
12. Process description along with
major equipment’s and
machineries, process flow sheet
(quantitative) from raw material
to products to be provided.
Process involves fermentation followed by
distillation. Details of the same are provided in
Chapter II,
Point No. 2.4, pg. 2-15 to 2-18,
figure 2.5 pg. no. 2-17.

52
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
13. Hazard identification and detailsofproposedsafety systems Fire is identified as a major
hazard. At the same time
other risks were also
assessed. Information on
the same is provided in
chapter7.
Please refer to Chapter
VII, Point No. 7.3, Table
no. 7.1 pg. 7-2 & 7-3 and
table 7.3, pg. no. 7-5.
14. Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s)including Amendments there
to obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an
Annexure. A certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional
Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as per circular dated
30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulated in all
the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be
provided. In addition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the
ongoing /existing operation of the project from SPCB shall be attached
with the EIA-EMP report
Not applicable.
This is new 45 KLPD
Distillery project
This is a new project.
15. In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance,
reasons for not taking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification
1994 and/or EIA Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent
to Establish/No Objection Certificate and Consent to Operate (in case of
units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-
2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliance
report to the conditionsofconsents fromthe SPCB shall be submitted
Not Applicable
The project is new
molasses-based distillery
unit of 45 KLPD capacity
This is a new project.

53
Continue….
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
16. Location of the project site covering
village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and
State, Justification for selecting the
site, whether other sites were
considered
The proposed project is located on plot/survey number 28/1,
30/1, 31/2, 32/1, 32/2, 33/1 village- Sawargaon Tal.
Majalgaon, Dist. Beed, Maharashtra. The project proponent is
having adequate open land available in the existing sugar mill
premises. As the raw material molasses will be provided by the
sugar mill – it is practical to install the distillery near to the
mill. It will save the transportation and impacts related to the
same.
Details are given in Chapter I,
Please refer to Figure No. 1.1, pg. 1-
3 and Chapter II, Point no. 2.2.4 Fig
2.1,2.2 pg. 2-3 to 2-5. & Slide no 7
ofPPT
17. A Toposheet of the study area of
radius of 10 km and site location on
1:50,000/1: 25,000 scale on an
A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-
sensitive areas and environmentally
sensitive places)
Toposheet numberE43E3 is referred Please refer to Annexure I (b) pg. 2
forToposheet.
Also attached at slide no 7 ofPPT
18. Details with respect to option analysis
for selection ofsite
Option analysis – not done. Reason for this is - Distillery are
often ancillary units of sugar industry. Adequate land is
available with the project proponent for proposed distillery
unit.
Please refer to Chapter V, Point No,
5.2, pg. 5-1.
19. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four
corners ofthe site
1. 19011’17.09”N &76007’14.44”E
2. 19011’21.84”N &76007’15.49”E
3. 19011’22.57”N &76007’10.04”E
4. 19011’20.09”N &76007’09.46”E
5. 19011’19.68”N &76007’11.27”E
6. 19011’18.46”N &76007’11.06”E
Please refer to Chapter III, Point
No. 3.3.1, pg. 3-1 &3-2.
And slide no 6 of PPT

54
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
20
Google map-Earth downloaded of the
project site
Provided in the EIA report in chapterIII
Please refer to Figure No. 3.1,
pg. 3-3. &slide no. 6
21
Layout maps indicating existing unit as well
as proposed unit indicating storage area,
plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If
located within an Industrial
area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial
area indicating location of unit within the
Industrial area/Estate
Layout map is provided in chapterII
Please refer to Chapter II,
Figure no. 2.2, pg. 2-5,
Annexure II, pg. 3. & Slide no.
9 ofPPT
22
Photographs of the proposed and existing
(if applicable) plant site. If existing, show
photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in
particular
Photograph of proposed site is provided in chapter II,
Photographs of plantation/greenbelt Not applicable – as this
is new project
Please refer to Chapter No. II,
Figure 2.1 & 2.2, pg. 2-5 and
figure 2.8, fig. 2.9 pg. 2-30 &
31. & slide no 8 ofPPT
23
Landuse break-up of total land of the
project site (identified and acquired),
government/private - agricultural, forest,
wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc.
shall be included. (not required for
industrial area)
Proposed land was underagricultural use.
The Sugar mill is holding 93 acres of land. Out of which
sugar mill has occupied approx. 35 acres, part of remaining
land which is flat, open will be allocated for proposed unit.
Therefore, out ofavailable land, a provision ofapprox. 18240
sq. m (~4.6 acre) is for the proposed distillery and ancillary
units.
Please refer to Chapter II,
Point No. 2.3.9., Table no. 2.7
pg. 2-14.

55
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
24.
A list of major industries with name and type within
study area (10km radius) shall be incorporated. Land
use details ofthe study area
Majalgaon MIDC is the nearest industrial
area at 4 km towards East from project site.
Land use details of the study area is
provided in chapterIII.
Please refer to Chapter III, Table
No. 3.18, pg. 3-30 to 3-31.
25.
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the
study area shall be included
These detailsare provided in chapterIII
No. 3.4.3, pg. 3-17, & Point No.
3.4.4, pg. 3-18.
26.
Details of Drainage of the project up to 5 km radius of
study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major
river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as
flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data
of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of the project
site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be
provided (mega greenfield projects)
Drainage map is provided in chapterIII.
Godavari is the nearest river to the project
site
no. 3.4.2, FigureNo. 3.6,pg. 3-12.
27.
Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not
complete, stage of the acquisition process and expected
time ofcomplete possession ofthe land
Land is already acquired by the project
proponent. It is owned by the project
proponent
Please refer annexure VIII page
23 for Land ownership details

56
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
28.
R&R details in respect of land in line with state
Government policy
Not required for the project Not Applicable
29
Permission and approval for the use of forestland
(forestry clearance), if any, and
recommendations of the State Forest Department
(if applicable)
Permission from the forest
department is not required for the
project, The project is planned on a
private land (non-forest land)
Not Applicable
30
Land use map based on High resolution satellite
imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating
the forestland (in case of projects involving forest
land more than 40 ha)
Land use map is provided in chapter
III pg. 3-4 to 3-6. Forest land not
required or used for the project
Forest land not involved
Please refer to Chapter III,
Point no. 3.3.2, pg. 3-4 to 3-6.
31
Status of Application submitted for obtaining the
stage I forestry clearance along with latest status
shall be submitted
No forest land is used for the
proposed project. This Term is not
applicable for the project.
No forest land is used for the
proposedproject

57
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
32. The projects to be located within 10 km of the
National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves,
Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project
proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated
by Chief WildlifeWarden showing these features vis-
à-vis the project location and the recommendations
or comments of the Chief WildlifeWarden thereon
This Term is not applicable for the
project.
Wildlife sanctuary or national park is
not presentwithin 10 km area of project
Not Applicable.
No National Parks,
Sanctuaries, Biosphere
Reserves, Migratory Corridors
of Wild Animals located within
10 km radius of the project
site
33. Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the
Chief Wildlife Warden of the State Government for
conservation of Schedule I fauna, if any exists in the
study area
This Term is not applicable for the
project
Not Applicable
34. Copy of application submitted for clearance under
the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to the Standing
Committee of the National Board for Wildlife
Not Applicable Not Applicable
35. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the
project site and site-specific micro-meteorological
data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly
wind speed and direction and rainfall
This data used for dispersion modeling
study for air pollutants – given in
chapter 4 page 4-10 and 4-12
Please refer to Chapter IV,
Point No. 4.3.3, pg. 4-7 to 4-10
and slide not 19-21 of the PPT

58
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
36. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters relevant to the project
shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be based
CPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant
wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors
including reserved forests
AAQ monitored at eight location including
project site. Monitoring is done as per
CPCB guidelines- covering upwind and
downwind directions.
Please refer to Chapter III,
Point No. 3.4.6, pg. 3-19,
Figure No. 3.9, 3.10, 3.11,
3.12, pg. 3-20 to 3-23. and
Baseline details are given in
Slide no 10 to 30 ofthe PPT
37. Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations
as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov.
2009 along with - min., max., average and 98% values for
each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations
should be provided as an annexure to the EIA Report
It is provided as an annexure to the EIA
report.
Min., max., average and 98% values for
each of the AAQ parameters is provided in
chapterIII ofEIA report
Please refer to Annexure. X-A
pg. 32-39., Chapter III point
3.4.6 pg. 3-19 to 3-22. and
Baseline details are given in
Slide no 10 to 30 ofthe PPT
38. Surface water quality of nearby River (100 m upstream and
downstream of discharge point) and other surface drains at
eight locations as perCPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines
This is Zero liquid discharge (ZLD)
project. Effluent will not be discharged
into any of the river. Hence, collection of
samples from 100 m up-stream and
downstreamare not applicable.
Samples from Paitalwadi lake and other
seven surface waterbodies from the study
area were collected and analysed. Details
provided in chapter3.
Please refer to Chapter No.
III, Table No. 3.10, pg. 3-15 to
3-16 and Baseline details are
given in Slide no 10 to 30 of
the PPT
39. Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river
identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC, ifyes give details
No. Not Applicable Not Applicable

59
# ToR Compliance Reference in EIA report/Document
40. Ground water monitoring at
minimum at 8 locations shall be
included
Ground water samples were collected from 8
locations and analysed. Monitoring location details
are provided in Chapter 3 referTable No. 3.9, pg. 3-
13 & 3-14. fordetails
Please refer to Chapter No. III, Table No. 3.9,
pg. 3-13 & 3-14. and Baseline details are
given in Slide no 10 to 30 ofthe PPT
41. Noise levels monitoring at 8
locationswithin the studyarea
Noise level measurement done at 8 locations from
the study area. Monitoring location details are
provided in Chapter 3 table 3.7 pg. 3-9 and Noise
monitoring results are provided in Table No. 3.11,
pg. 3-22 &3-23.
Please refer to Chapter No. III, Table 3.7 pg.
3-9 and Table No. 3.11, pg. 3-22 & 3-23. and
Baseline details are given in Slide no 10 to
30 of the PPT
42. Soil characteristic as per CPCB
guidelines
Soil samples were collected from 8 locations and
analysed. Monitoring location details are provided
in Chapter III Table 3.3 for monitoring locations
(pg. 3-9)
Please refer to Chapter No. III, Point no.
3.4.1.2, pg. no.3-10, Table No. 3.8,pg. 3-11.
43. Traffic study of the area, type of
vehicles,
frequency of vehicles for
transportation of materials,
additional traffic due to proposed
project, parking arrangementetc.
Traffic data is provided in chapterIII.
Additional traffic due to proposed project is
discussed in chapterIII
Please refer to Chapter No. III, Point No.
3.8.1, TableNo. 3.26, pg. 3-35.
Details about Additional traffic due to
proposed project is discussed in chapter III
Point no. 3.8.1 Pg. 3-35.

60
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
44. Detailed descriptionofflora and fauna
(Terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be
given with special reference to rare, endemic and
endangered species. If Schedule-I fauna are found within
the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be
prepared and furnished
The site and surrounding area represents mainly
grassland type of natural habitat mixed with
cultivable land. Details of the same is provided in
chapter3-point no, 3.6 page 3-24 to 3-28.
Schedule-I fauna – Leopard and Indian Wolf are
sighted irregularly in the study area.
Please refer to chapter 3-point
no, 3.6 page 3-24 to 3-28.
Annexure-XI for list of flora &
fauna existing in the study
area. Pg. 61-73
No schedule-I fauna was found
in the study area.
45. Socio-economic statusofthe study area Provided in Chapter. III Point No. 3.7, pg. 3.26 to
3.35.
Please refer to Chapter No. III,
Point No. 3.7, pg. 3.26 to 3.35.
46. Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants
from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features. In case the project is located on a
hilly terrain, the AQIP Modeling shall be done using inputs
of the specific terrain characteristics for determining the
potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative
impact of all sources of emissions (including
transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be assessed.
Details of the model used and the input data used for
modeling shall also be provided. The air quality contours
shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of
project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors,ifany.
Air pollutant dispersion modeling study was
carried out for the project using local met data.
Dispersion contours are plotted on the location
map foreasy understanding.
Please refer to Chapter No. IV,
Point No. 4.3.1, Point No. 4.3.2
& Point no. 4.3.3 pg. 4-5 to 4-
11.
47. Water Quality modeling - in case of discharge in water
body
No discharge in water body as ‘Zero liquid
discharge’ will be achieved. Therefore, this term
is not applicable forthe project
No discharge in water body as
‘Zero liquid discharge’ will be
achieved.

61
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
48. Impact of the transport of the raw materials
and end products on the surrounding
environment shall be assessed and provided.
In this regard, options for transport of raw
materials and finished products and wastes
(large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road
transport or convey or cum- rail transport
shall be examined
Transportation part i.e. probable requirement of vehicles for
transportation and its impact is discussed in chapter 4 of EIA report
Considering nature and scope of the project – transportation by road
is practical approach. Hence, considered the same for impact
assessment.
Please refer to Chapter IV, Point No.
4.3.4, pg. 4.10 & 4-11.
49. A note on treatment of wastewater from
different plant operations, extent recycled and
reused for different purposes shall be
included. Complete scheme of effluent
treatment. Characteristics of untreated and
treated effluent to meet the prescribed
standards of discharge under E(P) Rules
The management has decided to install standalone multiple effect
spent wash evaporation plant. Concentrated spentwash with >55%
solids (upto 60%) will be disposed through incineration to achieve
“Zero SpentWash Discharge” as per CPCB norms.
The spent wash evaporation condensate quantity of 360 m3/day
and distillation plant spent lees 90m3/day will be treated in
condensate polishing unit (CPU) and treated water will be reused for
distillery cooling tower or for fermentation process (molasses
dilution or cooling tower makeup water).
Please refer to Chapter II, Point No.
2.6.1, Table No. 2.11, Figure No. 2.6,
pg. 2-22 to 2-28.
50. Details of stack emission and action plan for
control of emissions to meet standards
Stack emission estimates are given in chapter 4 page 4-9 and 4-10. Please refer to Chapter IV, Point no.
4.3.2.1, pg. no. 4-6 to 4-11. and slide
no 19 to 21
51. Measures for fugitive emission control Important measures include transportation in covered vehicles,
sprinkling of water in coal and ash storage areas, De-dusting
arrangements, wind breaks, asphalting internal road and other
arrangements , In addition, greenbelt will be developed.
Please refer to Chapter IV, Point no.
4.3.4, 4-10 & 4-11 and slide no 19 to
21 and Chapter X Point no. 10.3.1,
pg. 10-7

62
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
52. Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage,
utilization and management. Copies of MOU regarding
utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall
also be included. EMP shall include the concept of waste-
minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy
conservation, and natural resource conservation.
Spent oil is the only hazardous waste anticipated from
the project. Quantity estimated is approx.
Except ash other solid waste is organic in nature and
easily disposable. Fly ash brick manufacturer/s will be
identified for giving fly ash. EMP of water and land
environment covers the measures for conservation of
resources.
Please refer to Chapter IV, Point
No. 4.3.6., pg. 4-12 to 4-13.
53. Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash
Notification, 2009. A detailed plan of action shall be provided
Ash generation (Maximum) of approx. 31.43 TPD is
estimated for the project. It will be given to fly ash
brick manufacturer, periodically.
Please refer to Chapter IV, Point
No. 4.3.6, pg. 4-12 to 4-13 and
Chapter X, Point no. 10.3.1, pg.
10-7.
54. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area
i.e. land with not less than 1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of
species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shall be
included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary
and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project
shall also be incorporated.
A) Distillery, evaporation unit (MEE), storage
lagoon, ETP/CPU, Incineration boiler, etc.= 18,240
sq.m.(~4.6 Acres)
B) Green belt =6070 sq.m (~1.5 acres)
C) Total Land for proposed unit = 24,310 sq. m (~6
Acres)
D) Total land holding = 93 acres
E) Land occupied by sugar unit (approx.) = 35 acres
Please refer to Chapter II, Point
No. 2.8, pg. 2-29 to 2-31 &
Proposed greenbelt details are
given in Chapter X, Point No.
10.4, pg. no. 10-11 to 10-15.
Table No. 10.2, 10.3 & 10.4, pg.
10-12 & 10-13.
55. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site
shall be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof tops and
storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to
use for the various activities at the project site to conserve
fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other
sources
Rain water harvesting details are provided in chapter
10 page 16-17. Estimated rain water from roof top
areas is 5495 cu.m. per year. Stored water will be used
for various activities, such as cooling tower makeup,
molasses dilution etc.
Please refer to Chapter IX, Point
No. 10.5, pg. 10-15, Table No.
10.5, pg. 10-16.

63
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
56. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for
environmental pollution control measures shall be
included
Estimated capital expenses on
Environment management = Rs. 2861
lakhs and recurring cost estimated at Rs.
837.3 lakhsper annum.
Please refer to Chapter II, Point
No. 2.9, pg. 2-32.
Chapter X, Point No. 10.9, Table
No. 10.8, pg. 10-19. and Slide no
4 and 45
57. Action plan for post-project environmental
monitoringshall be submitted
Environmental monitoring plan is covered
in detail in chapter VI of the report.
Please refer to Chapter VI, Point
no. 6.2.1, pg. 6-1 and table 6.2 on
page 6-3 and Slide no 44 to 48
58. Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and
Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency
Management Plan including Risk Assessment and
damage control. Disaster management plan should
be linked with District Disaster Management Plan
Onsite and Offsite Disaster management
plan is discussed in chapter VII Point No.
7.7, pg. 7-25, Point No. 7.11, pg. 7-33 and
Pointno. 7.12, pg. no. 7-37
Please refer to Chapter VII, Point
No. 7.7, pg. 7-25, Point No. 7.11,
pg. 7-33 and Point no. 7.12, pg.
no. 7-37.
59. Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational
health & safety of all contract and casual workers
Occupational health and safety aspect is
discussed in chapter 9 (EMP) at page 9-16
to 9-17. The management has made a
provision of total Rs. 3.5 lakhs for health
checkup in its internal budget. It will be
increased as per requirement.
Please refer to Chapter X, Point
10.6 page 10-16 to 10-17 and
Table No. 10.6, pg. 10-18.
and Slide no 45 & 46 of PPT

64
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
60
.
Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the
workers' health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x
rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision,
colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre-placement
and periodical examinations give the details of the same. Details
regarding last month analyzed data of above mentioned parameters
as per age, sex, duration of exposureand departmentwise.
This is new project of 45 KLPD
Distillery.
Pre-placement and periodical checkup
will be part of environment
management plan.
Please refer to
Annexure No. XII,
Pg. 74
61
.
Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the
exposure levels of hazards and whether they are within Permissible
Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL, what measures the
company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the
workers can be preserved
This is a new project. Hence, not
applicable.
Measures proposed for hazard control
are discussed in detail in chapter VII,
PointNo. 7.5 Table No. 7.4, pg. 7-6.
Please refer to
Chapter VII, Point
No. 7.5 Table No. 7.4,
pg. 7-6.
62
.
Annual report of health status of workers with special reference to
Occupational Health and Safety.
Sugar and cogeneration unit providing
the facility of Regular health checkup
for employees through Ashwini
hospital same will be done for this
new distillery project
Please refer to
Annexure XII, pg. 74.
63
.
Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy
approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA
report.
The mill already has, an
Environmental Policy in place.
Please refer to
Chapter VII, Figure
No. 7.1, pg. No 7.17

65
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
64. Does the Environment Policy prescribed for standard operating
process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement /
deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms
/conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA
Since the distillery unit is not yet
established the environmental policy
not yet framed.
No
65. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the
company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring
compliance with the environmental clearance conditions? Details of
this system may be given
Planned system for reporting (Bottom
to top) and decision implementation
(top to bottom) is represented in
chapter X
Please refer to
Chapter X, Figure
No. 10.5, pg. 10-19.
66. Does the company have system of reporting of non-compliances /
violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the
company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This
reportingmechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report
Planned system for reporting is from
bottom to top in figure 10.5 of chapter
10
Please refer to
Chapter X, Figure
No. 10.5, pg. 10-19.
67. Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel,
restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force during construction
as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during
operation phase.
Information on this is provided in
chapter 10,
Please refer to
Chapter X, Point No.
10.6, pg. no. 10-16
to 10-17.

66
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
68. Adequate funds (at least 2.5 % of the project cost) shall be
earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on
Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with time bound
action plan shall be included. Socio-economic development activities
need to be elaborated upon
CER budget is framed with reference
to the Office Memorandum of
MoEF&CC F.No.22-65/2017-IA.III
dated May 01, 2018. It is of Rs. 73
lakhs @ 1% of total capital budget.
Please refer to
Chapter X, Table No.
10.6, pg. 10-18. and
Slide no 37 of PPT
69. Any litigation pending against the project and/or any
direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so,
details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any
notice under the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or
relevant Sections of Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and
compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case
No litigation pending No litigation
pending
70
.
A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of aboveTOR Given in EIA Report Given in EIA Report

67
Specific Terms of Referencesfor EIA Studies; Distilleries
# ToR Compliance
Reference in EIA
report/Document
1. List of existing distillery units
in the study area along with
their capacity and sourcing of
raw material.
There is no distillery in 10 km radius study area of the project.
Majalgaon MIDC is the only industrial complex present in the 10 km
radius study area.
Chapter III, Table No.
3.18, pg. 3-30 & 3-31.
and slide no 6 to 8
2. Number of working days of the
distillery unit.
The distillery is planned to operate year around. For calculation purpose
operation of 330 daysisconsidered per annum.
Chapter II, Point No.
2.2.2, Table No. 2.1, pg.
2-2.
3. Details of raw materials such
as molasses/grains, their
source with availability
Estimated molasses requirement is calculated considering 330 days’
operation of the unit at 100% efficiency. Thus, project requires around
the 55,110 tons per annum (TPA) C type or 49,500 TPA B-type molasses.
From table 2.3 of chapter II, it is observed that, expected molasses
production of ‘C’ type (estimated @ 4% on cane) will be maximum
27,200 TPA and for B type (estimated @ 6% on cane) 40,800 TPA. In
case of B type of molasses, approx. 80% will get available from own mill.
Remaining requirement of raw material will be fulfilled by purchasing
molasses from the nearby sugar mills. Details of the same are discussed
in chapter 2 point2.3.1 page2-6 and 2-7.
Chapter II, point 2.3.1
page 2-6 and 2-7., Table
No. 2.2,2.3,2.4 pg. 2-6 to
pg. 2-7.

68
# ToR Compliance Reference in EIAreport/Document
4. Details of the use of steam
from the boiler.
Steam requirement and its utilization is provided in
chapter 2 under point2.3.4 page2-10
Details are given in Chapter II, Table No. 2.1,
pg. 2-3 & PointNo. 2.3.4, pg. 2-10.
5. Surface and Ground water
quality around proposed spent
wash storage lagoon, and
compost yard.
Samples collected from Mangrule no 1 lake and
Pitalwadi lake are the nearest surface water bodies to
the site located at approx. 3 km from the site. Its
analysis report is provided in chapter Table No. 3.9 &
3.10, pg. 3-13 to 3-16 (also enclosed as annexure
Whereas the water sample collected from well near to
the site is presented as samplefrom the site.
Details are given in Chapter III, Table No.
3.9 & 3.10, pg. 3-13 to 3-16.
Mill is going to adopt incineration boiler for
spent wash disposal hence compost yard is
not applicable.
6. Plan to reduce spent wash
generation within 6-8 KL/KL
of alcohol produced.
Spent wash generation will be restricted to 8 KL/KL
of alcohol.
Spent wash generation will be 360 m3/day. Its
volume will be 90 m3/day after evaporation. For this
advancetechnology will be adopted for distillation.
Details are given in Chapter II, Point No.
2.6.2, pg. 2-22 to 2-25, Figure2.6, pg. 2-25.

69
7. Proposed effluent treatment
system for molasses/grain
based distillery (spent wash,
spent lees, condensate and
utilities) as well as domestic
sewage and scheme for
achieving zero effluent
discharge (ZLD).
For spent wash – Evaporation followed by
incineration
Spent lees and process condensate will be treated in
condensate polishing unit (CPU). CPU schematic is
provided in. Treated water will be reused in the
distillery.
STP proposed for sewage.
2.6.2 and 2.6.3 pg. no. 2-23 to 2-28, Figure
2.3, pg. 2-11. and slide no. 34 to 36
8. Proposed action to restrict
fresh water consumption
within 10 KL/KL of alcohol
production.
Fresh water consumption is restricted to 9.11 KL/KL
of alcohol. This is feasible by increasing recycle and
reuse of water which is explained in water balance in
chapter 2 page 2-8 and 2-9 & table no. 2.5, pg. no. 2-8.
2.3.2, pg. 2-8 to 2-9 & table no. 2.5, pg. no.
2-8. and slide no. 34 to 36
9. Details about capacity of spent
wash holding tank, material
used, design consideration. No.
of piezometers to be proposed
around spent wash holding
tank.
Spent wash holding tank will be maximum of seven-
day capacity. It will be made impervious and
constructed as per CREP guidelines.
One piezometer is planned near spent wash holding
tank
Details are given in Chapter II, Point No
2.6.2.3 pg. 2-24, Figureno. 2.6, pg. no. 2-25
Chapter X, PointNo 10.3.3.1pg. 10-9.

70
10. Action plan to control
ground water pollution.
Zero liquid discharge will be achieved. Construction
of spent wash holding tanks as per CREP guidelines.
Transportation of spent wash thro’ HDPE pipeline.
Other wastewater such as spent lees and condensate
will be properly treated in CPU and reused.
Details are given in Chapter IV, Point No.
4.5.5 pg. 4-11 to 4-12 &
Chapter X, Point No 10.3. Table No. 10.1, pg.
10-3.
11. Details of solid waste
management including
management of boiler ash,
yeast, etc. Details of
incinerated spent wash ash
generation and its disposal.
Ash due to incineration of spent wash with coal will
be given to nearby brick manufacturingunit.
2.7.1, TableNo. 2.14, pg. 2-29.
12. Details of bio-composting
yard (if applicable).
It is not proposed in this project Not Applicable

71
13. Action plan to control odour
pollution.
Spent wash is mainly responsible for odour. It will be
stored in holding tanks of maximum seven-day
capacity. Restricted storage volume will help in
reducing the odour. Spent wash storage will be
strictly as per CREP norms. In addition, greenbelt will
help in controlling the odour to some extent
Details are given in Chapter IV, Point No.
4.3.4, pg. 4-10 & Pointno. 4.3.8, pg. 4-14.
14. Arrangements for
installation of continuous
online monitoring system
(24x7 monitoringdevice)
We assure for abiding by this term. It will be installed
after commissioning of the unit. In the budget for
EMP, a separate financial provision of have been made
for environmental monitoring, It includes the cost
towardscontinuous monitoringsystem.
Details are given in Chapter VI, Point No.
6.2.1.1, pg. 6-1 and PointNo. 6.2.1.2, pg. 6-2.

72
PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES ITS ACTIONPLAN WITH BUDGET,
TIMELINE INCLUDING DISPLY OF PH VIEDEO
● Public consultation for this project was conducted on 11 Dec 2020 at 11:30 A.M. at at Project site, Sonaji
nagar, Tal. Majalgaon, Dist. Beed. Maharshtra. which was presided over by the Shri Rahul Rekhawar ( District
Magistrate, BeedDistrict Beed) attendedbyofficers of MPCB,Beed.
● Thepublic hearingwas attendedby52 peoples
● Requisite publicity through local newspapers Daily times of India (English) and Dainik Sakal (Marathi) Dated
10 Nov2020was given30 daysin advanceof the date;.
● The project proponent has given commitment to fulfil the environmental and social responsibility for
developmentof community of nearbyvillages.

79
Photographsof Publichearing

ethnol project report sample (banking).pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to ethnol project report sample (banking).pdf

Similar to ethnol project report sample (banking).pdf (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

ethnol project report sample (banking).pdf