This document provides an overview of a presentation on ethics in clinical trials and the key role of informed consent. The presentation covers the historical background of informed consent, beginning with the Nuremberg Code in 1947 and the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964, both of which established the requirement of voluntary consent from subjects. It then discusses challenges with implementation of informed consent, including ensuring subjects comprehend the information and consent voluntarily without coercion. The presentation addresses debates around whether informed consent constitutes a legally enforceable contract and identifies issues that can arise with properly documenting, disclosing information, and assessing comprehension of informed consent.
Informed Consent: Promise, Pledge, Contract, or Platitude?Michael Swit
A discussion of the various theories of how informed consent operates under the law, who is bound by it, who is liable for a breach, and key cases relating to access to drugs.
Quorum Review's Institution Bulletin includes Letter from CEO, Cami Gearhart, JD, addressing OHRP's determination letter referring to consent forms and the SUPPORT trail, as well as Quorum's insights on two important topics: The first addresses consent for legally incapacitated adults and subjects physically unable to sign; the second reviews the recent FDA Subpart D changes on implications for placebo-controlled pediatric trials.
Michael Lynn: Capacity and Consent Issues [presented at Mental Health Law Con...Darius Whelan
Capacity and Consent Issues - Mr Michael Lynn, Senior Counsel
Presented at Mental Health Law Conference 2015 - Centre for Criminal Justice & Human Rights, School of Law, University College Cork and Irish Mental Health Lawyers Association
25 April 2015
http://www.imhla.ie
#mhlaw2015
INFORMED CONSENT: Pledge, Promise, Contract or Platitude? Key Aspects of Inf...Michael Swit
A discussion of the various theories of how informed consent operates under the law, who is bound by it, who is liable for a breach, and key cases relating to access to drugs.
Informed Consent: Promise, Pledge, Contract, or Platitude?Michael Swit
A discussion of the various theories of how informed consent operates under the law, who is bound by it, who is liable for a breach, and key cases relating to access to drugs.
Informed Consent: Promise, Pledge, Contract, or Platitude?Michael Swit
A discussion of the various theories of how informed consent operates under the law, who is bound by it, who is liable for a breach, and key cases relating to access to drugs.
Quorum Review's Institution Bulletin includes Letter from CEO, Cami Gearhart, JD, addressing OHRP's determination letter referring to consent forms and the SUPPORT trail, as well as Quorum's insights on two important topics: The first addresses consent for legally incapacitated adults and subjects physically unable to sign; the second reviews the recent FDA Subpart D changes on implications for placebo-controlled pediatric trials.
Michael Lynn: Capacity and Consent Issues [presented at Mental Health Law Con...Darius Whelan
Capacity and Consent Issues - Mr Michael Lynn, Senior Counsel
Presented at Mental Health Law Conference 2015 - Centre for Criminal Justice & Human Rights, School of Law, University College Cork and Irish Mental Health Lawyers Association
25 April 2015
http://www.imhla.ie
#mhlaw2015
INFORMED CONSENT: Pledge, Promise, Contract or Platitude? Key Aspects of Inf...Michael Swit
A discussion of the various theories of how informed consent operates under the law, who is bound by it, who is liable for a breach, and key cases relating to access to drugs.
Informed Consent: Promise, Pledge, Contract, or Platitude?Michael Swit
A discussion of the various theories of how informed consent operates under the law, who is bound by it, who is liable for a breach, and key cases relating to access to drugs.
inform consent form before participate in clinical trials.for purpose of understanding the nature of research,risk,benefits,and decision about participation
inform consent form in clinical research process.defination of inform consent form .documents required for inform consent form
elements required for inform consent form
In medical research on human subjects, considerations related to the well-being of the human subject should take precedence over the interests of science and society.
In this presentation it has been tried to give a glimpse of different type of consent, how it should be taken, how the patient to be explained, when consent is must and conditions where consent is not required, so as to guide you in your every day practice.
Regulations in clinical research: obligations and responsibilities of investi...TrialJoin
Two of the most important individuals in a clinical trial are investigators and sponsors. However, being such a crucial part of a trial also brings many obligations and responsibilities. Although the sponsor is the one who initiates and finances a trial, the investigator is the person who conducts it. For this reason, most of the obligations and responsibilities fall on the investigator as the person accountable for everything that goes wrong in a trial. Learning these obligations and knowing how to follow them is a crucial practice that will ensure compliance in a clinical trial.
For this reason, we’ve decided to compose this material that will give you a basic outline of all the rules and regulations that investigators and sponsors should follow.
Regulations in Clinical Research: Obligations and Responsibilities of Investi...Anand Butani
Two of the most important individuals in a clinical trial are investigators and sponsors. However, being such a crucial part of a trial also brings many obligations and responsibilities. Although the sponsor is the one who initiates and finances a trial, the investigator is the person who conducts it. For this reason, most of the obligations and responsibilities fall on the investigator as the person accountable for everything that goes wrong in a trial. Learning these obligations and knowing how to follow them is a crucial practice that will ensure compliance in a clinical trial.
For this reason, we’ve decided to compose this material that will give you a basic outline of all the rules and regulations that investigators and sponsors should follow.
Week#4-To Do List-CCHIntroduction To Consent and Documenta.docxphilipnelson29183
Week#4-To Do List-CCH
Introduction To Consent and Documentation
Documentation of patient consent to provide care, to disclose (or not disclose) information and other issues provide the necessary proof of compliance.
Objectives
To successfully complete this learning unit, you will be expected to:
Determine situations where consent is required.
Identify each type of written consent.
Determine the qualifications for a compliance officer.
Set internal policies for acquiring patient consent.
Establish a process to handle release of information.
Week 4: Discussion
Answer the following questions
1. Discuss the importance of the idea that everyone should complete an advance directive
2. Discuss the issue of super confidentiality
Week 4: Case Study Assignment
Include a response to the following case study:
Case study on page 75 of your textbook. (This is the first case study in the chapter and is titled "Chapter Case Study." It starts with: “Calls to Blue Cross Blue Shield Michigan’s (BCBSM) Anti-Fraud Hotline led to an . . .")
Your paper must address the following:
Address problem of the case decision
A thorough analysis including resources
Detailed comprehensive realistic recommendation
Supplements with extensive compelling evidence from legitimate sources
Sources cited correctly in the body of the case and reference page
Chapter Case Study
“July 28, 2003: A physician from Minneapolis, MN, agreed to pay $53,400 to resolve his liability under the CMP [Civil Monetary Penalties] provision applicable to violations of a provider’s assignment agreement. By accepting assignment for all covered services, a participating provider agrees that he or she will not collect from Medicare beneficiary more than applicable deductible and coinsurance for covered services.”
“The OIG alleged that the physician created a program whereby the physician’s patients were asked to sign a yearly contract and pay a yearly fee for services that the physician characterized as ‘not covered’ by Medicare. The OIG further alleged that because at least some of the services described in the contract were actually covered and reimbursable by Medicare, each contract presented to the Medicare patients constituted a request for payment other than the coinsurance and applicable deductible for covered services. In violation of these terms of the physician’s assignment agreement. In addition to payment of the settlement amount, the physician agreed not to request similar payments from beneficiaries in the future.” (http://www.oig.hhs.gov)
Essentials of Health Care Compliance
Week Three
Compliance: Patient Consent
Learning Outcomes
Identify the various situations in which consent is required
Determine the components of each type of written consent form
Explain the types of advance directives
Establish internal policies for acquiring patient consent
Design a process to handle release of information
The single biggest probl.
“Juris”- Law “Prudentia”- Knowledge . Therefore, Knowledge of Law
-In relation to practice of Medicine
-In relation with legal consequences
Medical Jurisprudence is also known as legal medicine.
Medical jurisprudence or legal medicine is the branch of science and medicine involving the study and application of scientific and medical knowledge to legal problems, such as inquests and in the field of law.
medical
judisprudence
legal medicine
dentistry
mbbs doctors
ethics
rules in medicine
medical practise
consents
autopsy
doctor patient state relation
medical negligence
biomedical
medical devices
malpractice
medico legal cases
dental course
dr. swostik devkota
bright line dental care
GMP Review -- Legal Letter from America Column -- How Data Integrity Issues S...Michael Swit
Article appearing in the October 2018 issue of GMP Review by Michael A. Swit explores how data integrity issues sunk a $4.3 billion acquisition of Akorn by Fresenius. Article stresses lessons not just for quality professionals, but also their top management.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 8: Handling Promotional Com...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices,November 2, 2018, Boston.
More Related Content
Similar to Ethics in Clinical Trials -- The Key Role of Informed Consent
inform consent form before participate in clinical trials.for purpose of understanding the nature of research,risk,benefits,and decision about participation
inform consent form in clinical research process.defination of inform consent form .documents required for inform consent form
elements required for inform consent form
In medical research on human subjects, considerations related to the well-being of the human subject should take precedence over the interests of science and society.
In this presentation it has been tried to give a glimpse of different type of consent, how it should be taken, how the patient to be explained, when consent is must and conditions where consent is not required, so as to guide you in your every day practice.
Regulations in clinical research: obligations and responsibilities of investi...TrialJoin
Two of the most important individuals in a clinical trial are investigators and sponsors. However, being such a crucial part of a trial also brings many obligations and responsibilities. Although the sponsor is the one who initiates and finances a trial, the investigator is the person who conducts it. For this reason, most of the obligations and responsibilities fall on the investigator as the person accountable for everything that goes wrong in a trial. Learning these obligations and knowing how to follow them is a crucial practice that will ensure compliance in a clinical trial.
For this reason, we’ve decided to compose this material that will give you a basic outline of all the rules and regulations that investigators and sponsors should follow.
Regulations in Clinical Research: Obligations and Responsibilities of Investi...Anand Butani
Two of the most important individuals in a clinical trial are investigators and sponsors. However, being such a crucial part of a trial also brings many obligations and responsibilities. Although the sponsor is the one who initiates and finances a trial, the investigator is the person who conducts it. For this reason, most of the obligations and responsibilities fall on the investigator as the person accountable for everything that goes wrong in a trial. Learning these obligations and knowing how to follow them is a crucial practice that will ensure compliance in a clinical trial.
For this reason, we’ve decided to compose this material that will give you a basic outline of all the rules and regulations that investigators and sponsors should follow.
Week#4-To Do List-CCHIntroduction To Consent and Documenta.docxphilipnelson29183
Week#4-To Do List-CCH
Introduction To Consent and Documentation
Documentation of patient consent to provide care, to disclose (or not disclose) information and other issues provide the necessary proof of compliance.
Objectives
To successfully complete this learning unit, you will be expected to:
Determine situations where consent is required.
Identify each type of written consent.
Determine the qualifications for a compliance officer.
Set internal policies for acquiring patient consent.
Establish a process to handle release of information.
Week 4: Discussion
Answer the following questions
1. Discuss the importance of the idea that everyone should complete an advance directive
2. Discuss the issue of super confidentiality
Week 4: Case Study Assignment
Include a response to the following case study:
Case study on page 75 of your textbook. (This is the first case study in the chapter and is titled "Chapter Case Study." It starts with: “Calls to Blue Cross Blue Shield Michigan’s (BCBSM) Anti-Fraud Hotline led to an . . .")
Your paper must address the following:
Address problem of the case decision
A thorough analysis including resources
Detailed comprehensive realistic recommendation
Supplements with extensive compelling evidence from legitimate sources
Sources cited correctly in the body of the case and reference page
Chapter Case Study
“July 28, 2003: A physician from Minneapolis, MN, agreed to pay $53,400 to resolve his liability under the CMP [Civil Monetary Penalties] provision applicable to violations of a provider’s assignment agreement. By accepting assignment for all covered services, a participating provider agrees that he or she will not collect from Medicare beneficiary more than applicable deductible and coinsurance for covered services.”
“The OIG alleged that the physician created a program whereby the physician’s patients were asked to sign a yearly contract and pay a yearly fee for services that the physician characterized as ‘not covered’ by Medicare. The OIG further alleged that because at least some of the services described in the contract were actually covered and reimbursable by Medicare, each contract presented to the Medicare patients constituted a request for payment other than the coinsurance and applicable deductible for covered services. In violation of these terms of the physician’s assignment agreement. In addition to payment of the settlement amount, the physician agreed not to request similar payments from beneficiaries in the future.” (http://www.oig.hhs.gov)
Essentials of Health Care Compliance
Week Three
Compliance: Patient Consent
Learning Outcomes
Identify the various situations in which consent is required
Determine the components of each type of written consent form
Explain the types of advance directives
Establish internal policies for acquiring patient consent
Design a process to handle release of information
The single biggest probl.
“Juris”- Law “Prudentia”- Knowledge . Therefore, Knowledge of Law
-In relation to practice of Medicine
-In relation with legal consequences
Medical Jurisprudence is also known as legal medicine.
Medical jurisprudence or legal medicine is the branch of science and medicine involving the study and application of scientific and medical knowledge to legal problems, such as inquests and in the field of law.
medical
judisprudence
legal medicine
dentistry
mbbs doctors
ethics
rules in medicine
medical practise
consents
autopsy
doctor patient state relation
medical negligence
biomedical
medical devices
malpractice
medico legal cases
dental course
dr. swostik devkota
bright line dental care
GMP Review -- Legal Letter from America Column -- How Data Integrity Issues S...Michael Swit
Article appearing in the October 2018 issue of GMP Review by Michael A. Swit explores how data integrity issues sunk a $4.3 billion acquisition of Akorn by Fresenius. Article stresses lessons not just for quality professionals, but also their top management.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 8: Handling Promotional Com...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices,November 2, 2018, Boston.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 7: FTC RegulationMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices,
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 6: First Amendment, Off-Lab...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 2, 2018, Boston.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 5: Social Media & InternetMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 4: FDA Enforcement – Action...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston.
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 3: Disseminating Scientific...Michael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising --Part 2: Direct-to-Consumer AdsMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices,November 1-2, 2018, Boston
FDA Regulation of Promotion & Advertising -- Part 1: The BasicsMichael Swit
Presentation to the Compliance Online 2-day course on Ensuring Compliance with FDA Requirements for the Promotion & Advertising of Drugs and Medical Devices, November 1-2, 2018, Boston.
Ensuring FDA Regulatory Success for Biomedical Companies -- Key Lessons for S...Michael Swit
Supporting Materials for Michael Swit's Panel remarks at the Workshop Co-sponsored by the Orange County Regulatory Affairs (OCRA) Discussion Group and the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) @ UCI Applied Innovation
Regulatory, Quality & Clinical Due Diligence: The Oft Overlooked Keys to Suc...Michael Swit
June 23, 2010 webinar sponsored by The Weinberg Group, with an emphasis on key issues to explore during due diligence in acquiring FDA-regulated products or companies.
Presentation on Critical Legal Issues Facing GMP ComplianceMichael Swit
August 27, 2018 Presentation to the 23rd Annual GMP by the Sea Conference in Cambridge, Maryland, focusing on the potential legal consequences faced by companies that violate FDA's requirements on Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) for drugs and biologics
Overview of FDA Drug Manufacturing RequirementsMichael Swit
Presentation on FDA Regulation of Drug Manufacturing to the Introduction to Drug Law Course sponsored by the Food & Drug Law Institute (FDLI) on July 25, 2018 in San Francisco.
Combination Products, Orphan Drugs, and OTC DrugsMichael Swit
Presentation to the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Exam review course on FDA regulation of combination products, orphan drugs, and OTC drugs.
Latest Developments in and the Future of the Regulatory Landscape for Approv...Michael Swit
Presentation on "Latest Developments in and the Future of the
Regulatory Landscape for Approving Treatments
for Orphan and Rare Diseases," given at the Orphan Drugs & Rare Diseases -- 2018 Americas West Coast Conference.
June 25, 2018. San Diego, CA.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Ethics in Clinical Trials -- The Key Role of Informed Consent
1. AMERICAN CONFERENCE INSTITUTE
12th National Conference On Managing Legal Risks And
Conducting Clinical Trials
New York City
February 24, 2010
Michael A. Swit, Esq.
Vice President
Ethics in Clinical Trials –
The Key Role of Informed Consent
2. 2
Standard Disclaimers
Views expressed here are solely mine and do not
reflect those of my firm or any of its clients.
This presentation supports an oral briefing and
should not be relied upon solely on its own to
support any conclusion of law or fact.
3. 3
What I Will Cover on Informed Consent
Historical Background – Quickly
“Law” of Informed Consent
Implementation Issues
5. 5
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
First modern ethical code requiring
Voluntary consent
Benefits outweigh risks
Ability of the subject to terminate participation
6. 6
Declaration of Helsinki (1964)
Recommendations Guiding Medical Doctors in
Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects
Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki,
Finland, 1964; revised in Tokyo, 1975; Venice, 1983;
Hong Kong, 1989; South Africa, 1996;Edinburgh 2000;
Note of clarification on paragraph 29; Washington 2002
7. 7
Helsinki Declaration …
“Concern for the interests of the subject must
always prevail over the interests of science and
society”
http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm
8. 8
Beecher Article (1966)
“Ethics and clinical research” — Henry K.
Beecher, New England Journal of Medicine 274
(1966):1354-60
22 published medical studies presenting risk to subjects
without their knowledge or approval
Published in some of the most prestigious journals and
conducted at some of the most acclaimed institutions by some
of the most highly regarded researchers
9. 9
Where the Burden Lies
“The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the
quality of the consent rests upon each individual
who initiates, directs or engages in the
experiment.”
Principle 1, The Nuremberg Code
10. 10
Where the Burden Lies …
“When obtaining informed consent for a research
project, the doctor should be particularly cautious
if the subject is in a dependent relationship to him
or her, or under duress.”
The Declaration of Helsinki
“In that case, the informed consent should be obtained
by a doctor who is not engaged in the investigation and
who is completely independent of this relationship.”
11. 11
Beecher’s Paradox
The Voluntary Consent of the Human Subject is
Paramount
Nuremberg
True Informed Consent Is Probably An Unattainable
Goal
Beecher
12. 12
The Belmont Report
1974 – The National Commission for the Protection
of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral
Research
1979 – Commission Report – “Belmont”
Validates IRB role as a key aspect of subject protection
1981 – Federal Regulations Revised
“Common Rule” – basically across whole fed. govt.
FDA – some exceptions, minor in nature
13. 13
Where the Regulations Lie
HHS – if supported by federal funding – 45 CFR
116.
FDA – 21 CFR Part 50
Differences
Emergency Situations:
FDA --an exception from the informed consent requirements in
emergency situations.
Based on the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, but may be used in
investigations involving drugs, devices, and other FDA regulated
products in situations described in § 50.23.
HHS – no exception
14. 14
Differences – FDA vs. HHS
Waivers or altering informed consent elements:
HHS – can waive or alter elements of informed consent
under certain conditions.
FDA -- no such provision because the types of studies
which would qualify for such waivers are either not
regulated by FDA or are covered by the emergency
treatment provisions (§ 50.23)
Inspection of records –
FDA -- explicitly requires that subjects be informed that
FDA may inspect the records of the study because FDA
may occasionally examine a subject's medical records
when they pertain to the study.
HHS – while has right to inspect records of studies it
funds, it does not impose that same informed consent
requirement.
15. 15
Differences – FDA v. HHS …
Signatures & Dating on I.C. Forms:
FDA -- explicitly requires that consent forms be dated as well
as signed by the subject or the subject's legally authorized
representative.
HHS -- does not explicitly require consent forms to be dated.
16. 16
The Law of Informed Consent –
Contract, Fiduciary Duty, Promise,
Pledge or Platitude?
17. 17
Treatment vs. Research – Key Distinction
Law of Informed Consent – must remember that what
governs medical treatment is not always same as what
governs research
Treatment
Doctor – arguably -- is a fiduciary – owes duty to protect patient
Traditional view – unconsented treatment = battery
Causation –
Not disclosed
Injured
Reasonable Patient would want to know
Reasonable Patient would have refused the treatment – HARD
PART
18. 18
How Research Differs from Treatment
Goals – treatment vs. developing generalizable
knowledge
How Overseen:
Treatment – doctor supplies expertise
Research – highly regulated by sources other than the doctor –
protocol and government regulation
e.g., if sponsor concludes treatment is ineffective, must stop
research
Law – state (treatment) vs. federal (research) –
some exceptions
19. 19
Battery
Problem – any failure could be alleged to be a battery,
which is an intentional tort (technically); due to this,
courts do not favor it as a remedy
Will occur:
Complete lack of consent
Procedure given differed from that consented
“Ghost Surgery” – undisclosed replacement surgeon
20. 20
Is the I.C. a Contract Legally Enforceable
by the Subject?
Basic contract law
Parties in privity – i.e., two make a deal
Legal subject
Offer
Acceptance
Consideration
Problem – lack of privity – sponsor may provide
the form, but it is obtained by P.I. from the subject
– no privity
21. 21
But, People (Alan Milstein) Still Argue Contracts
Suthers & Abney Cases
GNDF trials – discontinued by Amgen as showing no benefit
– thus, required under IND rules
Plaintiffs – you owe us the drug under normal contracts
theory and the doctrine of “promissory estoppel” – also a
contracts theory
Clear promise
Detrimental reliance by promisee
Damages by promisee
22. 22
Suthers and Abney Decisions
No contract
Amgen not a party to I.C., nor was the P.I. an agent of Amgen
that could bind Amgen via the I.C.; rather they were
“independent contractors”
Look at control over the P.I.’s work
Here the protocol drafted by the P.I.
No promissory estoppel
Unable to show Amgen promised continued access
23. 23
Fiduciary?
Suthers & Abney – also asserted that the Amgen
was a fiduciary; not found by court
Amgen did not set up the clinical initially; no unique duty
owed to subjects or proof that Amgen’s role was done for the
benefit on the patients
Note: court suggested that the parties to be bound
by contract via the I.C. were the P.I. and the
universities where P.I. worked
24. 24
Problems with Fiduciary Theory
Goal of research – generalizable knowledge
Subject is not the prime beneficiary of research –
rather it is the public at large
P.I. and sponsor both have less control over the
way research is done
26. 26
Execution Issues
Documentation -- If it wasn’t written down … It
didn’t happen!
Extent of Disclosure -- Sufficient (complete)
information to subject to understand
Comprehension – was it understood?
Voluntariness – free of coercion and undue
influence?
Paper vs. Process – signature not enough, process
must be complete so that Principal Investigator has
confidence consent was informed
27. 27
90% state they read the consent themselves
8% did not read it and 2% had it read to them
85% understood the number of visits yet
63% understood that the study was blinded and neither they
nor their physician would know which medication they were
receiving
60% understood that they could contact someone
other than their doctor regarding rights and risks
30% did not understand that the study carried additional
risks and discomforts
Source: 2002 CenterWatch Survey of 1,561 Study Volunteers
Comprehension and Informed Consent
28. 28
Call, e-mail, fax or write:
Michael A. Swit, Esq.
Vice President
The Weinberg Group Inc.
336 North Coast Hwy. 101
Suite C
Encinitas, CA 92024
Phone 760.633.3343
Fax 760.454.2979
Cell 760.815.4762
michael.swit@weinberggroup.com
www.weinberggroup.com
Questions?
29. 29
About your speaker…
Michael A. Swit, Esq., is a Vice President at The Weinberg Group Inc., a premier science-based consulting firm
dedicated to helping life sciences firms bring highly regulated-products to the market and keep them there using
sound science and cutting-edge regulatory acumen. At The Weinberg Group, he develops and ensures the execution
of an array of regulatory and other consulting services to biomedical clients seeking to market products in the United
States and Europe. His expertise includes FDA development strategies, compliance and enforcement initiatives,
recalls and crisis management, submissions and related traditional FDA regulatory activities, labeling and advertising,
and clinical research efforts.
Mr. Swit has been addressing critical FDA legal and regulatory issues since 1984. His multi-faceted experience
includes serving for three and a half years as corporate vice president, general counsel and secretary of Par
Pharmaceutical, a prominent, publicly-traded, generic drug company and, thus, he brings an industry and commercial
perspective to his work with FDA-regulated companies. Mr. Swit then served for over four years as CEO of
FDANews.com, a top publisher of FDA regulatory newsletters and other specialty information products for the FDA-
regulated community. His private FDA regulatory law practice has included service as Special Counsel in the FDA
Law Practice Group in the San Diego office of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe and with the Food & Drug Law
practice at McKenna & Cuneo, both in the firm’s Washington office and later in San Diego. He first practiced FDA
regulatory law with the D.C. office of Burditt & Radzius.
Mr. Swit has taught and written on a wide variety of subjects relating to FDA law, regulation and related commercial
activities, including, since 1989, co-directing a three-day intensive course on the generic drug approval process and
editing a guide to the generic drug approval process, Getting Your Generic Drug Approved. A former member of the
Food & Drug Law Journal Editorial Board, he also has been a prominent speaker at numerous conferences sponsored
by such organizations as RAPS, FDLI, and DIA. A magna cum laude graduate of Bowdoin College, he received his
law degree from Emory University Law School and is a member (inactive) of the California, D.C. and Virginia bars.