This document discusses a webinar series on connecting universal design for learning (UDL), differentiated instruction (DI), and individualized supports through meaningful participation. The goals are to introduce UDL as proactive curriculum design that reduces barriers to learning, explore DI as responsive instructional design, and introduce individualized planning frameworks for students who need more support. UDL, DI, and individualized supports ultimately aim to provide appropriate instruction for diverse students in inclusive classrooms. The webinar series will cover UDL, DI, and individualized planning approaches.
From promise to practice: UDL in 21st Century Inclusive ClassroomsKathy Howery
This document discusses universal design for learning (UDL) and moving it from promise to practice in inclusive education. UDL aims to increase access to learning for all students by reducing barriers through providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. It outlines the three principles of UDL and nine guidelines to support flexibility in goals, methods, materials and assessments. The document advocates designing instruction and curriculum from the start to be accessible and flexible for expected learner variability, rather than making adaptations later. It provides examples of digital tools and apps that can support UDL implementation by allowing flexible representation, expression and engagement. While UDL aims to reduce barriers proactively, assistive technologies will still play a role in supporting some learners. Overall
This document provides an overview of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles presented by Kathy Howery. UDL aims to increase access to learning for all students by reducing barriers through flexible goals, methods, materials and assessments. It is based on three principles: multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. UDL calls for options that accommodate learner differences and leverage diversity. The goal is to create inclusive learning environments that provide meaningful access through an optimal balance of support and challenge for every learner.
1) The document discusses academic diversity and inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education.
2) It outlines five key issues regarding students with disabilities including understanding disability, identifying course requirements, providing accommodations, maintaining academic integrity, and moving toward greater inclusion.
3) The conclusion is that inclusive teaching practices that accommodate students with disabilities would benefit all students and support diverse learning.
These slides were prepared for a workshop on inclusive teaching in Higher Education. Aims: To discuss what you would like inclusion to mean at your university; to raise awareness of the different types of visible and hidden disabilities; to explore inclusive communication and interaction with respect to various types of disability; to brainstorm ways in which staff and students can work together in partnership to foster greater inclusiveness.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) provides a framework for designing curricula that are accessible to all students, including those with intensive support needs. The document discusses UDL principles like providing multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. It also addresses providing intensive supports through differentiated instruction, assistive technology, and specialized instruction to meet student needs, while striving to educate students in inclusive, least restrictive environments.
This document discusses Universal Design for Learning (UDL), an educational framework that aims to meet the needs of diverse learners by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. UDL is based on research about how the brain learns and is meant to reduce barriers in education by developing flexible learning environments accommodated for individuals' varied abilities, needs and learning styles. The document outlines the principles of UDL and provides examples of how its guidelines can be applied through technologies, materials, and teaching methods to benefit all students.
Reflections on the difference between disruptive capitalism and digital transformations. A fuller version of I Am Disruptive, Digital, adding in ideas from the online session with University of Salford and resolving them into a coherent presentation. Thanks to co-presenter Graham Attwell, organiser Chriss Nerantzi and technical guru Cristina Costa
From promise to practice: UDL in 21st Century Inclusive ClassroomsKathy Howery
This document discusses universal design for learning (UDL) and moving it from promise to practice in inclusive education. UDL aims to increase access to learning for all students by reducing barriers through providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. It outlines the three principles of UDL and nine guidelines to support flexibility in goals, methods, materials and assessments. The document advocates designing instruction and curriculum from the start to be accessible and flexible for expected learner variability, rather than making adaptations later. It provides examples of digital tools and apps that can support UDL implementation by allowing flexible representation, expression and engagement. While UDL aims to reduce barriers proactively, assistive technologies will still play a role in supporting some learners. Overall
This document provides an overview of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles presented by Kathy Howery. UDL aims to increase access to learning for all students by reducing barriers through flexible goals, methods, materials and assessments. It is based on three principles: multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. UDL calls for options that accommodate learner differences and leverage diversity. The goal is to create inclusive learning environments that provide meaningful access through an optimal balance of support and challenge for every learner.
1) The document discusses academic diversity and inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education.
2) It outlines five key issues regarding students with disabilities including understanding disability, identifying course requirements, providing accommodations, maintaining academic integrity, and moving toward greater inclusion.
3) The conclusion is that inclusive teaching practices that accommodate students with disabilities would benefit all students and support diverse learning.
These slides were prepared for a workshop on inclusive teaching in Higher Education. Aims: To discuss what you would like inclusion to mean at your university; to raise awareness of the different types of visible and hidden disabilities; to explore inclusive communication and interaction with respect to various types of disability; to brainstorm ways in which staff and students can work together in partnership to foster greater inclusiveness.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) provides a framework for designing curricula that are accessible to all students, including those with intensive support needs. The document discusses UDL principles like providing multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. It also addresses providing intensive supports through differentiated instruction, assistive technology, and specialized instruction to meet student needs, while striving to educate students in inclusive, least restrictive environments.
This document discusses Universal Design for Learning (UDL), an educational framework that aims to meet the needs of diverse learners by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. UDL is based on research about how the brain learns and is meant to reduce barriers in education by developing flexible learning environments accommodated for individuals' varied abilities, needs and learning styles. The document outlines the principles of UDL and provides examples of how its guidelines can be applied through technologies, materials, and teaching methods to benefit all students.
Reflections on the difference between disruptive capitalism and digital transformations. A fuller version of I Am Disruptive, Digital, adding in ideas from the online session with University of Salford and resolving them into a coherent presentation. Thanks to co-presenter Graham Attwell, organiser Chriss Nerantzi and technical guru Cristina Costa
Meteri ini disampaikan oleh Suhendri, Widyaiswara PPPPTK TK dan PLB, pada kegiatan Webinar: Implementation of Inclusive Education in Early Childhood, yang diselenggarakan oleh PPPPTK TK dan PLB
The document presents a model of the relationships between informal, non-formal and formal learning. It depicts informal learning as emerging from the interests of individuals and groups, who organize and access resources to pursue self-determined interests. Non-formal learning involves resources created or provided to support learning sequences and audiences. Formal learning flows from institutions that offer accreditation and related resources to enable groups to meet accredited goals. The model shows learning flowing from left to right, driven by natural curiosity, while education flows from right to left, following institutional rules.
Plenary session presented at the "Creating Communities of Learning" Australasian Professional Legal Education Conference, 14-15 November 2014 at AUT, Auckland
From learning design to effective practicesaliceproject
This document discusses developing educators' professionalism in adult education through the ALICE project. It outlines phases of the ALICE project including training adult trainers in designing intergenerational learning experiences using creative languages. The document emphasizes using learning design and design thinking approaches to plan educational interventions and represent practices for discussion, evaluation, and sharing as open educational resources to improve adult education.
This document discusses how online learning can both individualize education through tools like individual learning plans, as well as foster collaboration through programs that bring together diverse groups of learners. It provides examples of the Individualized Learning Plan (ILP) used in Rhode Island schools to customize education to each student's needs and interests. It also describes the European Literacy and Citizenship Education (ELICIT) program that forms international collaborations among learners. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) advocates for educational programs that develop students' technological, cultural, numeracy and literacy skills to prepare them for the 21st century. It argues individualization and collaboration can be harmonized in innovative curriculum design that enhances learning
Practical Universal Design seminar slides Jan 2020 Karen Dunne
This document provides an overview of a seminar on Universal Design for Learning (UDL). It begins with introducing the presenters and providing logistical information. The schedule then outlines topics to be covered, including what UDL is, its principles and neuroscience rationale, design guidelines for accessibility, and bringing UDL into the classroom. Key points from the seminar content include defining UDL and its three principles of representation, expression and engagement. Neuroscience concepts around threat vs reward states and the polyvagal theory are discussed. Design guidelines cover hierarchy, color, fonts, images and more. The seminar aims to help make teaching and learning more inclusive and accessible for all students.
Erasmus+ Cliche_ Education for sustainable development _ Blended learning guideVivi Carouzou
This document provides information about an Erasmus+ project called CLICHE that aims to promote education for sustainable development and the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage.
The project involves partners from 6 countries who will develop blended educational materials and lesson plans focused on local intangible cultural heritage and its relationship to sustainable development. They will research local intangible cultural heritage, document it using videos and photos, and create an online inventory. Educational packages will integrate intangible cultural heritage into different subject areas using interdisciplinary and participatory approaches. The goal is to make the curriculum more meaningful and grounded in students' lived experiences.
Part of a series of presentations about Challenge-based Learning and Curtin University's Global Challenge platform. Presented during May 2020 via the Cisco Digital Schools Network.
http://LearningFuturesNetwork.org
http://GlobalCnallenge.org.au
SSAT Conference Session
https://www.ssatrust.org.uk/sites/NationalConference2010/abouttheevent/Pages/fridaykeynotevideos.aspx for a video of David Lambert in action...
The document discusses how individualization and collaboration can both be important aspects of education in the 21st century. It provides examples of the Individualized Learning Plan (ILP) used in Rhode Island schools, which allows students to customize their education, and the European Literacy and Citizenship Education (ELICIT) program, which promotes collaboration across European countries. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) advocates for educational programs that develop both subject matter knowledge and competencies through technological literacy and other capacities. Programs that successfully integrate individualization and collaboration may offer innovative approaches to curriculum design.
Student-directed engagement in community-linked STEM integration through coll...Kim Flintoff
Prepared for the Deakin STEM Education Conference 2021.
This paper will be co-authored by a team of participating Year 10 students who are working on a challenge-based learning project in their TIDES (Technology Innovation Design Enterprise Sustainability) class at Peter Carnley Anglican Community School.
They are considering a problem derived from the theme of National Science Week 2021 (Food: Different by Design). The focus on issues relating to Food Security has enabled them to create a body of work that supports deep engagement and a scope of learning that exceeds most traditional content-delivery models. They have been able to generate work that can be submitted across a variety of contexts and to enable entry to several external programs for recognition.
With their teacher, the students will describe and evaluate the processes and ways of working they have adopted, as well as highlighting how their work has produced interdisciplinary artifacts that can be used to guide and assess learning across a range of subject areas within their regular school timetable. They will also consider the benefits of student agency and external audiences in building engagement and focus in their learning. The students will discuss how programs such as Game Changer Awards, ANSTO National Science Week Hackathon, STEM4Innovation and think tank events provide platforms for the practice and application of their collaborative human-centered design-thinking process to enhance their learning in STEM and other areas across the curriculum.
Too often student experience of learning is not reflected in education conferences. As one of the most important voices in the whole system, they often struggle to be heard. This paper will provide insights into student perceptions of integrated STEM as an approach to meaningful learning that provides scope and depth of learning across many parts of the broader K-100 curriculum. Content and capabilities will be considered and the students along with their teacher will endeavour to unpack the benefits and challenges they encounter.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) aims to make curricula accessible and appropriate for all students by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. This is achieved through the use of flexible curriculum materials and assistive technologies. UDL breaks down barriers for diverse learners by offering alternatives that address different learning styles, abilities, and disabilities. Assistive technologies play a role in UDL by helping to overcome specific barriers individual students face in order to access and participate in the learning environment. Both UDL and assistive technologies strive to ensure all students, including those with disabilities, have access, can participate, and progress in their education.
Educating Students Who Need Intensive Supports in a UDL Environment
This slide presentation was developed by participants of the 2012 Ohio Center for Autism and Low Incidence (OCALI) Conference to provide an overview of how students with disabilities (who need intensive supports) can be served in an educational environment that has integrated the principles of Universal Design for Learning.
Controversies and Navigation of Inclusive Education in the Context of Bangladeshinventionjournals
Inclusive education is one of the most important steps to promote integration of special learners in our society, yet it is not much familiar or established everywhere. Collaboration with mainstream students is a big platform to make them efficient citizen. It ensures their holistic development and flourishes their individual identity. All the children have equal right to participate and get opportunities of education together; especially these segregated groups need to be surrounded by people who will lift them higher. But practically the way is full of difficulties. Differences persist in policymaking, curriculum, classroom arrangements, teaching-learning system, evaluation, materials, teacher training and so forth. This paper tries to identify and reduce the gap between the practices of these two educational sectors. In this respect, mainstream educators and practitioners have been interviewed to know their interest, expectations and doubts about this assimilation. Besides, some successful cases have been observed closely with a purpose of bringing it in practice from the conceptual stage.
1) Universal design for learning (UDL) aims to provide all students equal access to curriculum by designing flexible instruction that accommodates learner differences. It shifts from a one-size-fits-all approach to teaching diverse learners.
2) UDL is based on three principles - providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. This allows for varying needs across different learning networks in the brain.
3) Implementing UDL and using tools from CAST can increase student engagement and motivation by matching their interests and preferred ways of learning. It also supports teachers in meeting the needs of diverse learners.
H παρουσίαση αυτή συνόδευσε ένα βιωματικό και συνεργαστικό σεμινάριο σχετικά με παιδαγωγικά μοντέλα και τεχνικές, με τίτλο: «Διαφοροποιημένη Διδασκαλία: Μία Ηράκλεια Προσπάθεια» (“Differentiated Instruction: A Herculean Task”).
Στo σεμινάριο αυτό, το οποίο διεξήχθει στην αγγλική γλώσσα, στις εγκαταστάσεις του 11ου Νηπιαγωγείου Χανίων, Κρήτης, τον Απρίλιο του 2016, συμμετείχαν εκπαιδευτικοί προερχόμενοι από τη Γαλλία, την Εστονία, την Ελλάδα, την Ισλανδία, την Ιταλία και την Τουρκία, στο πλαίσιο του Προγράμματος Erasmus+/Δράση ΚΑ2 «Συνεργασία για καινοτομία και ανταλλαγή καλών πρακτικών στον τομέα της Σχολικής Εκπαίδευσης» - Στρατηγικές Σύμπραξης αποκλειστικά μεταξύ σχολείων, με γενικό τίτλο «Ζώντας μαζί στο Σχολείο: Κοινωνικές αλληλεπιδράσεις, Μαθησιακές Ικανότητες και Ρυθμοί Παιδιού» (“Live together in the school: Social interactions, Learning skills & Child’s rhythms”).
Universal design for learning (UDL) is a framework that provides flexible approaches to curriculum, materials, goals, and assessments to meet the needs of all students. The three main principles of UDL are representation, action and expression, and engagement. UDL aims to reduce barriers in learning by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement rather than expecting students to adapt to a single way of learning. UDL benefits all students, including those with disabilities or diverse learning needs, by creating more accessible learning environments and opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge.
How the learning space can become an inclusive learning space – Lessons from ...Karel Van Isacker
How the learning space can become an inclusive learning space – Lessons from Europe... USA and Latin America
Presented at CAVA2018, 21-24 August 2018 in Medellin, Colombia.
Differentiation is adapting teaching methods and content to meet the needs of individual students. It is based on the idea that students learn in different ways and at different paces. The document discusses the theoretical origins of differentiation in the work of Vygotsky and Gardner. It explains that differentiation is important because all students can learn more when taught appropriately. However, some critics argue that differentiation is just good teaching and that the focus on learning styles is misguided. The document provides examples of differentiation strategies and homework options for teachers.
This document discusses Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and how it intersects with assistive technology to support all learners. UDL is a framework that aims to accommodate a broad range of learners by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. It reduces barriers for students with disabilities but also enhances learning for all students. The document explains how UDL and assistive technology are related but distinct, both striving to ensure access, participation, and progress for all. Implementing UDL principles through flexible tools and technologies can help level the playing field for diverse learners.
The document discusses Universal Design for Learning (UDL), an educational framework that aims to accommodate diverse learners by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. It notes the increasing diversity in today's classrooms and calls for more flexible approaches to teaching and curriculum design. UDL principles align with differentiated instruction by recommending flexible content, processes, and products to meet varied student needs along a continuum. The document advocates teacher collaboration and use of technology as ways to effectively reach more students through a universally designed curriculum.
This document provides an overview of laws and practices related to teaching learners with special needs. It discusses key laws like PL 94-142/IDEA which require schools to provide students with disabilities a free and appropriate public education. It also covers Section 504, ADA, and NCLB which extended civil rights protections. Key concepts discussed include individualized education programs (IEPs), inclusion, response to intervention (RTI), universal design for learning (UDL), and differentiated instruction. The document emphasizes that teachers must consider the diverse needs and dimensions of diversity among learners with special needs.
Meteri ini disampaikan oleh Suhendri, Widyaiswara PPPPTK TK dan PLB, pada kegiatan Webinar: Implementation of Inclusive Education in Early Childhood, yang diselenggarakan oleh PPPPTK TK dan PLB
The document presents a model of the relationships between informal, non-formal and formal learning. It depicts informal learning as emerging from the interests of individuals and groups, who organize and access resources to pursue self-determined interests. Non-formal learning involves resources created or provided to support learning sequences and audiences. Formal learning flows from institutions that offer accreditation and related resources to enable groups to meet accredited goals. The model shows learning flowing from left to right, driven by natural curiosity, while education flows from right to left, following institutional rules.
Plenary session presented at the "Creating Communities of Learning" Australasian Professional Legal Education Conference, 14-15 November 2014 at AUT, Auckland
From learning design to effective practicesaliceproject
This document discusses developing educators' professionalism in adult education through the ALICE project. It outlines phases of the ALICE project including training adult trainers in designing intergenerational learning experiences using creative languages. The document emphasizes using learning design and design thinking approaches to plan educational interventions and represent practices for discussion, evaluation, and sharing as open educational resources to improve adult education.
This document discusses how online learning can both individualize education through tools like individual learning plans, as well as foster collaboration through programs that bring together diverse groups of learners. It provides examples of the Individualized Learning Plan (ILP) used in Rhode Island schools to customize education to each student's needs and interests. It also describes the European Literacy and Citizenship Education (ELICIT) program that forms international collaborations among learners. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) advocates for educational programs that develop students' technological, cultural, numeracy and literacy skills to prepare them for the 21st century. It argues individualization and collaboration can be harmonized in innovative curriculum design that enhances learning
Practical Universal Design seminar slides Jan 2020 Karen Dunne
This document provides an overview of a seminar on Universal Design for Learning (UDL). It begins with introducing the presenters and providing logistical information. The schedule then outlines topics to be covered, including what UDL is, its principles and neuroscience rationale, design guidelines for accessibility, and bringing UDL into the classroom. Key points from the seminar content include defining UDL and its three principles of representation, expression and engagement. Neuroscience concepts around threat vs reward states and the polyvagal theory are discussed. Design guidelines cover hierarchy, color, fonts, images and more. The seminar aims to help make teaching and learning more inclusive and accessible for all students.
Erasmus+ Cliche_ Education for sustainable development _ Blended learning guideVivi Carouzou
This document provides information about an Erasmus+ project called CLICHE that aims to promote education for sustainable development and the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage.
The project involves partners from 6 countries who will develop blended educational materials and lesson plans focused on local intangible cultural heritage and its relationship to sustainable development. They will research local intangible cultural heritage, document it using videos and photos, and create an online inventory. Educational packages will integrate intangible cultural heritage into different subject areas using interdisciplinary and participatory approaches. The goal is to make the curriculum more meaningful and grounded in students' lived experiences.
Part of a series of presentations about Challenge-based Learning and Curtin University's Global Challenge platform. Presented during May 2020 via the Cisco Digital Schools Network.
http://LearningFuturesNetwork.org
http://GlobalCnallenge.org.au
SSAT Conference Session
https://www.ssatrust.org.uk/sites/NationalConference2010/abouttheevent/Pages/fridaykeynotevideos.aspx for a video of David Lambert in action...
The document discusses how individualization and collaboration can both be important aspects of education in the 21st century. It provides examples of the Individualized Learning Plan (ILP) used in Rhode Island schools, which allows students to customize their education, and the European Literacy and Citizenship Education (ELICIT) program, which promotes collaboration across European countries. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) advocates for educational programs that develop both subject matter knowledge and competencies through technological literacy and other capacities. Programs that successfully integrate individualization and collaboration may offer innovative approaches to curriculum design.
Student-directed engagement in community-linked STEM integration through coll...Kim Flintoff
Prepared for the Deakin STEM Education Conference 2021.
This paper will be co-authored by a team of participating Year 10 students who are working on a challenge-based learning project in their TIDES (Technology Innovation Design Enterprise Sustainability) class at Peter Carnley Anglican Community School.
They are considering a problem derived from the theme of National Science Week 2021 (Food: Different by Design). The focus on issues relating to Food Security has enabled them to create a body of work that supports deep engagement and a scope of learning that exceeds most traditional content-delivery models. They have been able to generate work that can be submitted across a variety of contexts and to enable entry to several external programs for recognition.
With their teacher, the students will describe and evaluate the processes and ways of working they have adopted, as well as highlighting how their work has produced interdisciplinary artifacts that can be used to guide and assess learning across a range of subject areas within their regular school timetable. They will also consider the benefits of student agency and external audiences in building engagement and focus in their learning. The students will discuss how programs such as Game Changer Awards, ANSTO National Science Week Hackathon, STEM4Innovation and think tank events provide platforms for the practice and application of their collaborative human-centered design-thinking process to enhance their learning in STEM and other areas across the curriculum.
Too often student experience of learning is not reflected in education conferences. As one of the most important voices in the whole system, they often struggle to be heard. This paper will provide insights into student perceptions of integrated STEM as an approach to meaningful learning that provides scope and depth of learning across many parts of the broader K-100 curriculum. Content and capabilities will be considered and the students along with their teacher will endeavour to unpack the benefits and challenges they encounter.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) aims to make curricula accessible and appropriate for all students by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. This is achieved through the use of flexible curriculum materials and assistive technologies. UDL breaks down barriers for diverse learners by offering alternatives that address different learning styles, abilities, and disabilities. Assistive technologies play a role in UDL by helping to overcome specific barriers individual students face in order to access and participate in the learning environment. Both UDL and assistive technologies strive to ensure all students, including those with disabilities, have access, can participate, and progress in their education.
Educating Students Who Need Intensive Supports in a UDL Environment
This slide presentation was developed by participants of the 2012 Ohio Center for Autism and Low Incidence (OCALI) Conference to provide an overview of how students with disabilities (who need intensive supports) can be served in an educational environment that has integrated the principles of Universal Design for Learning.
Controversies and Navigation of Inclusive Education in the Context of Bangladeshinventionjournals
Inclusive education is one of the most important steps to promote integration of special learners in our society, yet it is not much familiar or established everywhere. Collaboration with mainstream students is a big platform to make them efficient citizen. It ensures their holistic development and flourishes their individual identity. All the children have equal right to participate and get opportunities of education together; especially these segregated groups need to be surrounded by people who will lift them higher. But practically the way is full of difficulties. Differences persist in policymaking, curriculum, classroom arrangements, teaching-learning system, evaluation, materials, teacher training and so forth. This paper tries to identify and reduce the gap between the practices of these two educational sectors. In this respect, mainstream educators and practitioners have been interviewed to know their interest, expectations and doubts about this assimilation. Besides, some successful cases have been observed closely with a purpose of bringing it in practice from the conceptual stage.
1) Universal design for learning (UDL) aims to provide all students equal access to curriculum by designing flexible instruction that accommodates learner differences. It shifts from a one-size-fits-all approach to teaching diverse learners.
2) UDL is based on three principles - providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. This allows for varying needs across different learning networks in the brain.
3) Implementing UDL and using tools from CAST can increase student engagement and motivation by matching their interests and preferred ways of learning. It also supports teachers in meeting the needs of diverse learners.
H παρουσίαση αυτή συνόδευσε ένα βιωματικό και συνεργαστικό σεμινάριο σχετικά με παιδαγωγικά μοντέλα και τεχνικές, με τίτλο: «Διαφοροποιημένη Διδασκαλία: Μία Ηράκλεια Προσπάθεια» (“Differentiated Instruction: A Herculean Task”).
Στo σεμινάριο αυτό, το οποίο διεξήχθει στην αγγλική γλώσσα, στις εγκαταστάσεις του 11ου Νηπιαγωγείου Χανίων, Κρήτης, τον Απρίλιο του 2016, συμμετείχαν εκπαιδευτικοί προερχόμενοι από τη Γαλλία, την Εστονία, την Ελλάδα, την Ισλανδία, την Ιταλία και την Τουρκία, στο πλαίσιο του Προγράμματος Erasmus+/Δράση ΚΑ2 «Συνεργασία για καινοτομία και ανταλλαγή καλών πρακτικών στον τομέα της Σχολικής Εκπαίδευσης» - Στρατηγικές Σύμπραξης αποκλειστικά μεταξύ σχολείων, με γενικό τίτλο «Ζώντας μαζί στο Σχολείο: Κοινωνικές αλληλεπιδράσεις, Μαθησιακές Ικανότητες και Ρυθμοί Παιδιού» (“Live together in the school: Social interactions, Learning skills & Child’s rhythms”).
Universal design for learning (UDL) is a framework that provides flexible approaches to curriculum, materials, goals, and assessments to meet the needs of all students. The three main principles of UDL are representation, action and expression, and engagement. UDL aims to reduce barriers in learning by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement rather than expecting students to adapt to a single way of learning. UDL benefits all students, including those with disabilities or diverse learning needs, by creating more accessible learning environments and opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge.
How the learning space can become an inclusive learning space – Lessons from ...Karel Van Isacker
How the learning space can become an inclusive learning space – Lessons from Europe... USA and Latin America
Presented at CAVA2018, 21-24 August 2018 in Medellin, Colombia.
Differentiation is adapting teaching methods and content to meet the needs of individual students. It is based on the idea that students learn in different ways and at different paces. The document discusses the theoretical origins of differentiation in the work of Vygotsky and Gardner. It explains that differentiation is important because all students can learn more when taught appropriately. However, some critics argue that differentiation is just good teaching and that the focus on learning styles is misguided. The document provides examples of differentiation strategies and homework options for teachers.
This document discusses Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and how it intersects with assistive technology to support all learners. UDL is a framework that aims to accommodate a broad range of learners by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. It reduces barriers for students with disabilities but also enhances learning for all students. The document explains how UDL and assistive technology are related but distinct, both striving to ensure access, participation, and progress for all. Implementing UDL principles through flexible tools and technologies can help level the playing field for diverse learners.
The document discusses Universal Design for Learning (UDL), an educational framework that aims to accommodate diverse learners by providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. It notes the increasing diversity in today's classrooms and calls for more flexible approaches to teaching and curriculum design. UDL principles align with differentiated instruction by recommending flexible content, processes, and products to meet varied student needs along a continuum. The document advocates teacher collaboration and use of technology as ways to effectively reach more students through a universally designed curriculum.
This document provides an overview of laws and practices related to teaching learners with special needs. It discusses key laws like PL 94-142/IDEA which require schools to provide students with disabilities a free and appropriate public education. It also covers Section 504, ADA, and NCLB which extended civil rights protections. Key concepts discussed include individualized education programs (IEPs), inclusion, response to intervention (RTI), universal design for learning (UDL), and differentiated instruction. The document emphasizes that teachers must consider the diverse needs and dimensions of diversity among learners with special needs.
The slides presented by Susan McKenney (Twente University) during her seminary Pedagogy and diverse needs @ HOCLAB Politecnico di Milano (February 4, 2010). You can watch the recorded seminar at the page: http://collab.switch.ch/p74402176
The document discusses the differences between personal and personalized learning. Personalized learning involves tailoring education for individual learners, but the learner has little control over their path. Personal learning empowers the learner to control what, how, and where they learn based on their own needs and interests. It argues that for learners to become truly effective, they must be able to learn independently by finding their own resources and curriculum outside of formal education systems. Teachers have an important role in cultivating curious, independent learners through feedback loops and guidance.
This document discusses Universal Design for Learning (UDL), which provides alternatives so that every student can learn by addressing different learning styles. UDL is based on principles of multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. It uses technology and flexible methods to engage students and address their individual needs. Brain research shows people learn in different ways through different brain networks, supporting the need for UDL's flexible approach.
This presentation, created by the National UDL Task Force, provides an introduction to universal design and universal design for learning. It then illustrates how UDL applies to the whole curriculum and how UDL is being supported at the local, state, and federal level.
Frederic Fovet Presentatin at the UDL and Inclusive Practice Symposium: Reach...Frederic Fovet
Post-secondary campuses are attracting an increasingly diverse student population. This must be celebrated as it means that the post-secondary classroom is also increasingly representative of the population at large; it means as well that all students are confronted with diversity in their campus experience and learn to embrace it; the internationalization of post-secondary institutions furthermore leads to greater opportunities to develop global citizenship.
This diversity of the student population, however, is not always perceived by faculty as easy or seamless to address proactively. As a result, students’ expectations can often clash with current teaching and learning practices that have not changed as fast as the composition of the student body has done. This leads to friction. It is not just students with disabilities that are experiencing barriers in their learning; International students, second language learners, culturally diverse and racialized students, first generation students, Indigenous students, and non-traditional learners all report experiencing similar barriers in their learning in the post-secondary classroom. Together, these students often represent a majority on our campuses - a majority that does not feel learning is designed for their needs.
It is becoming urgent therefore to find ways of eroding this friction. The solutions must address the needs of diverse learners proactively, but also support faculty as they rethink their classroom practices. These solutions must be sustainable, user-friendly, cost-effective, and powerful; they must guarantee a rapid change in our teaching and learning landscape, uphold the standards of post-secondary education, and ensure the creation of genuinely inclusive provisions.
The session will explore how Universal Design for Learning is uniquely positioned as a framework to address these pressing needs. The session will be interactive and seek to empower participants with a firm mastery of the UDL principles, to offer them practical examples of their use in the classroom, and to guide them as they begin their journey with implementation.
This document discusses future focused education and the need to transform education systems to prepare students for an uncertain future. It argues that education must shift from an industrial, compliance-based model to focus on developing skills like critical thinking, problem solving, creativity and collaboration. Schools need more flexible structures that allow for innovation, collaboration between educators, and input from students and communities. The focus should be on designing the future rather than looking back, and allowing new practices to emerge from the bottom up through an open, adaptive culture of innovation.
Ppt universal design for learning (udl) forSarla Santwani
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is an educational framework based on cognitive neuroscience that provides flexible learning environments to accommodate diverse learners. It ensures flexibility through customized presentation of information, engagement of learners, and demonstration of achievement. The goal is to create an optimal learning environment that produces strategic, knowledgeable, and motivated learners. Traditionally, education has used a "one size fits all" approach, but UDL recognizes learner diversity and provides multiple means of representation, engagement, and action/expression to accommodate different learning needs, styles, and abilities.
This document discusses developing inclusive learning environments. It defines inclusion, inclusive education, and learning-friendly environments. Inclusion means including all children in mainstream schools. A learning-friendly environment responds to learners' specific needs. An inclusive mindset believes all people have equal value. The document presents principles of inclusive education, including valuing diversity, strength-based personalized curriculums, student engagement and agency, engaging stakeholders, and teachers with commitment, knowledge and skills. It provides examples of how to apply these principles and recommends inclusive teachers receive adequate support.
2. Goals for this series:
Step 1 - Introduce UDL as proactive curricular design that
leverages diversity and technology to reduce or eliminate
inappropriate challenges (barriers) to learning
Step 2 – Explore Differentiated Instruction as instructional
design that is responsive to the particular needs of students in
your class.
Step 3- Introduce the PM as a planning framework for those
students who need something more, or significantly
different, in order to actively and meaningfully participate
and achieve their educational goals.
3. UDL and DI are often confused as both
ultimately have many of the same
aims: to provide appropriate instruction
for the diversity of students who are
being taught in today’s inclusive
classrooms.
6. UDL DI PM
Approach is… Proactive Responsive Individualized
Focus is on… Environment Groups of Individual
Learners Learner Needs
Solution Eliminating Compensatory Remedial/
involves… barriers Strategies Specialized
interventions/Su
pports
KHOWERY 09/10/2012
7. How this will work…
Webinars
October 9, December 7, February 15
Wiki
https://erlc.wikispaces.com/Making+Connections+U
DL%2C+DI+and+Individualized+Supports
Ning
http://reachingallstudents.ning.com/group/making-
connections-webinar-
pilot?xgi=2P72dXVMPune4f&xg_source=msg_invite_g
roup
Open Q & A
Dates to be determined
http://www.doodle.com/7bxfq8erdrtns9b6
11. Universal Design
Extension of architectural concept of Universal Design
Designing for the divergent needs of special
populations increases usability for everyone.
12. To many people the term seems to imply
that UDL is a quest for a single, one size-
fits-all, solution that will work for everyone.
In fact, the very opposite is true.
The essence of UDL is flexibility and the
proactive inclusion of alternatives.
17. Our current system?
Combining the medical model (to be abnormal
is to be unhealthy) and the statistical model
(abnormally large or abnormally small amounts
of measured characteristic)… turns behavior
patterns into pathological signs. (Skrtic, 1986)
19. Something new?
“The new challenge of inclusion is to
create schools in which our day-to-day
efforts no longer assume that a particular
text, activity, or teaching mode will “work”
to support any particular students’
learning”
Ferguson, 1995
20. What is new?
The Disabled Curriculum rather
than the Disabled Child!
http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlcurriculum/disable
dcurricula
21. Social construction of (Dis) Ability
The social model suggests it is
society that causes the
individual with (physical or
psychological) differences to
be disabled. In other words
individuals with impairments
are not disabled by their
impairments but by the barriers
that exist in society constructed
for the “norm”.
http://www.brainhe.com/TheSocialMo
delofDisabilityText.html
22. Ableism
An ableist society is said to be one that treats
non-disabled individuals as the standard of
“normal living”, which results in public and
private places and services, education, and
social work that are built to serve 'standard'
people, thereby inherently excluding those with
various disabilities.
Wikipedia
KHOWERY 09/10/2012
23. Ableism in Education (Hehir, 2008)
Applied to schooling and child development… the
devaluation of disability results in societal attitudes that
uncritically assert that:
It is better for a child to walk than roll
Read print than read braille
Spell independently than use a spell checker
Hang out with with non-disabled children rather than only
with other disable children.
KHOWERY 09/10/2012
27. What about in the Educational Environment?
Disability = a Mismatch between learner needs
and education offered
Disability is artifact of lack of appropriate
relationship between the learner and the
learning environment or education delivery.
Jutta Treviranus
28. Disabled Curriculum
The traditional, one-size-fits-all
curriculum is proving to be an
entirely inadequate solution for
problems that plague our schools
in this era of standards-based
reform.
CAST
29. Universal Design for Learning
is a set of principles for curriculum
development that give all individuals
equal opportunities to learn.
31. The Curriculum
Programs of Study
Provincial
Assessment
Resources
Instruction & Classroom
Assessment
32. CAST:
Center for Applied Special Technology
Universal Design for Learning is a set of
principles for curriculum development
that give all individuals equal
opportunities to learn.
www.cast.org
33. Universal Design for Learning calls for ...
* Multiple means of representation, to give
learners various ways of acquiring information
and knowledge,
* Multiple means of action and expression, to
provide learners alternatives for demonstrating
what they know,
* Multiple means of engagement, to tap into
learners' interests, offer appropriate challenges,
and increase motivation.
KHOWERY 09/10/2012
34. UDL Guidelines
From the three principles, nine guidelines have been developed
that form the primary foundation of UDL.
The guidelines articulate the principles but their main purpose is
to guide educators and curriculum developers in using
evidence- based means of addressing the range of variability
that any classroom typically experiences.
36. How do we get there?
Designing an educational system to teach
all students that will also support
individualized and flexible instruction
designed to teach each student
Expect Learner Variability
38. In an Alberta school of 500 students,
we might expect to see…
39. •25 students
with learning disabiliti
•40 students
with AD/HD
40. 45 students who live
below the poverty line
•40 students whose first
language is not English or
French
•25 students
who are First
Nations, Métis or
Inuit (FNMI)
45. Diversity could also mean …
Differences in:
background knowledge and
experience
learning preferences
learning strengths
personal interests and
motivation
levels of engagement
47. What barriers might these
students experience?
Physical
Policy
Practice
Attitude
Knowledge
Curricular
48. Universal Design for Learning
An educational approach that aims to
increase access to learning for all
students by reducing
physical, cognitive, intellectual, organizat
ional and other barriers.
49. Think Different
Expected Learner Variability
Proactive Reduction of Barriers
Plan for and provide Flexibility
50. Diversity Profile
What is the diversity of students you can expect
in your classrooms?
What might be barriers to their learning success?
51. CAST Guidelines
The UDL Guidelines are organized according to the
three main principles of UDL that address
representation, expression, and engagement. For
each of these areas, specific "Checkpoints" for
options are highlighted, followed by examples of
practical suggestions.
http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines
53. Go to the Guidelines
http://www.cast.org/library/UDLguidelines/index.html
Google “udl Guidelines”
54. Principle 1: Representation
Students differ in the ways that they perceive
and comprehend information that is presented
to them.
For example, those with sensory disabilities
(e.g., blindness or deafness), learning
disabilities (e.g., dyslexia), language or cultural
differences, and so forth may all require
different ways of approaching content. Others
may simply grasp information better through
visual or auditory means rather than from
printed text.
57. More ideas for Representation
Digital resources
www.LearnAlberta.ca
Book Rags
http://www.bookrags.com/
60 Second Recap
http://www.60secondrecap.com/
YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzAtEqFU3Lc&feature
=related
58. Options for Comprehension
MCGill’s The Brain from Top to Bottom
http://thebrain.mcgill.ca/
Free Online Automatic Text Summarization Tool
http://www.textcompactor.com/
60. Principle 2: Action & Expression
Students differ in the ways that they can navigate a
learning environment and express what they
know.
For example, individuals with significant motor
disabilities (e.g., cerebral palsy), those who
struggle with strategic and organizational abilities
(e.g., executive function disorders, ADHD), those
who have language barriers, and so forth
approach learning tasks very differently. Some
may be able to express themselves well in writing
text but not oral speech, and vice versa.
65. Principle 3 : Engagement
Students differ markedly in the ways in
which they can be engaged or motivated
to learn.
Some students are highly engaged by
spontaneity and novelty while other are
disengaged, even frightened, by those
aspects, preferring strict routine.
68. Universal Design for Learning
Using digital materials & pervasive technologies in the
classroom we can create a more accessible and
flexible environment for all students.
69. The Future is in the Margins
When new technologies move beyond their
initial stage of development, innovations in
curriculum design, teaching strategies and
policies will be driven by the needs of students
“at the margins”, those for whom present
technologies are least effective- most
prominently, students with disabilities.
The beneficiaries of these innovations will be ALL
students.
Rose & Meyer, 2000
72. The Steve Jobs Model for
Educational Reform
"If you read the front pages of the New York
Times, they will tell you that technology's promise
has not yet been realized in terms of student
performance. My answer is, of course not. If we
simply attached computers to leeches, medicine
wouldn't be any better today than it was in the
19th century either. You don't get change by
plugging in computers to schools designed for the
industrial age. You get it by deploying technology
that rewrites the rules of the game."
-RUPERT MURDOCH
73. Rewriting the rules of the game!
Flexible MATERIALS
Flexible instructional METHODS
Clear Accessible GOALS
Accessible & Authentic ASSESSMENT
74. Clearly Defined Goals
You need to know what your goal is to
understand and set up how this will work!
Goals the reduce barriers for expected
student diversity
75. UDL Goals
The key is to design a goal that represents
the true purpose of the learning activity.
Clear goals enable us to determine which
alternative pathways and scaffolds can
be used to meet diverse learning needs
while keeping the learning challenge
where it belongs.
77. Separating the Goal from the Means:
Writing Goals and Objectives that Increase Access*
Goals/Objectives that LIMIT Access: Goals/Objectives that ALLOW Access:
Instead of … Try …
The student will write… The student will express…
The student will generate…
The student will read… The student will receive information…
The student will spell… The student will select…
The student will compute… The student will solve…
The student will define… The student will show…
* From Gargiulo & Metcalf (2010) p. 270
80. ELA Programs of Study
Grade 9 General Outcome 2
Students will listen, speak, read, write, view and
represent to comprehend and respond
personally and critically to oral, print and other
media texts.
Grade 1 Specific Learner Outcome 2.1
talk about print or other media in texts previously
read or viewed
85. Universally Designed
Assessment
Must clearly understand what
we are assessing!
Reduce Construct Irrelevant
Variance!
Multiple pathways to
demonstrating success.
Be authentic!
86. Goal of UDL
Creating learning and learning
environments which provide meaningful
access for every learner
Support Challenge
87. So Let’s Review:
1. UDL is about expecting diversity!
2. UDL is proactive!
3. UDL is about accessibility! Technology can get
us there.
4. UDL is about appropriate goals that do not
define the means.
5. UDL is about reducing construct irrelevant
variance!
6. UDL is not one size fits all!
7. UDL is the beginning not the end!
88. Why UDL?
Why am in interested in using UDL as a planning
framework?
What change am I hoping for as a result of
proactively designing UDL
goals, methods, materials, and assessments?
How will I know this change has occurred, or is
occurring?
89. What is our expected Diversity Profile?
What barriers might these students
encounter?
90. UDL Planning
Step 1: Accessible GOALS
What will the students learn?
Programs of Study: Learner Outcomes
General Learner Outcomes
Specific Learner Outcomes
What is the GOAL of this lesson? BE INTENTIONAL.
Are the goals achievable in a variety of means? LOOK
FOR BARRIERS
Are the goals achievable by students I can expect to be in
my class?
How might I need to reconsider? Reframe my goals?
91. UDL Planning
Step 2: Accessible & Flexible Resources
What resources & materials do I currently have?
Authorized Resources
Learn Alberta
Textbooks
Manipulative
Are the materials accessible to the expected diversity of
students?
Are the materials appropriate for the expected diversity of
students? LOOK FOR BARRIERS
How might I access DIGITAL RESOURCES?
What kind of technologies are available to my class?
92. UDL Planning
Step 3: Flexible Methods
What instructional methods do I currently use?
Lecture
Demonstration
Text
Are my methods accessible to the expected diversity of
students?
Are my methods appropriate for the expected diversity
of students? LOOK FOR BARRIERS
How might I plan for increased flexibility in my methods?
How might I DIFFERENTIATE my methods?
93. UDL Planning
Step 4: Assessment
What assessment methods do I currently use?
Paper & Pencil
Demonstration
Products
Do I have a one-size-fits all assessment process?
Are my assessments accessible to the expected diversity of students?
Are my assessments appropriate for the expected diversity of students?
LOOK FOR BARRIERS
How might I reduce construct irrelevant variance?
How might I offer appropriate choice in students demonstration of
learning?
How might I need to design rubrics in a UDL based lesson?
95. Webinar 2:
Now that we have proactively designed
expecting diversity what do we do to differentiate
instruction and provide appropriate supports.
Differentiate based on:
Readiness
Interests
Preferences