Download as PDF, PPTX
More Related Content
Similar to Erasmus evaluation grid&and_descriptors
Erasmus evaluation grid&and_descriptors
- 1. Erasmus+ KA2 “Stepsof Citizenship” EVALUATION GRID AREAS AND CRITERIA OF EVALUATION EVALUATION a. COORDINATION 1 2 3 4 5 Clear division of tasks among the partners Clear division of tasks inside each school Clear timetable b. COMMUNICATION 1 2 3 4 5 Communication and exchanges Clarity in communication Working meetings productivity for the project c. ACTIVITIES 1 2 3 4 5 Adherence of planned activities to objectives Processes in terms of 1. motivation 2. operativity
- 2. Processes interms of 1. Products/outputs 2. behaviours d. TRANSNATIONAL MEETINGS 1 2 3 4 5 Adherence of the organized activities to the projects’ objectives Productivity during the transnational workshops
- 3. AREAS AND CRITERIAOF EVALUATION DESCRIPTORS a. COORDINATION 1 2 3 4 5 Clear division of tasks among the partners Tasks’ division is not clear at all Tasks’division is clear in a few aspects Tasks’ divisioni is clear enough Tasks’ division is clear Tasks division is very clear Clear division of tasks inside each school Tasks’ division is not clear at all Tasks’division is clear in a few aspects Tasks’ divisioni is clear enough Tasks’ division is clear Tasks division is very clear Clear timetable Timetable is not clear at all Timetable is clear in a few aspects Timetable is clear enough Timetable is clear Timetable is very clear b. COMMUNICATION 1 2 3 4 5 Communication and exchanges Communication and exchanges never take place preventing the regular implementation of the project Communication and exchanges take place only a few times making the implementation of the project difficult Communication and exchanges are enough for the regular implementation of the project Communication and exchanges take place on regular bases and make the implemetation of the project quite easy Communication and exchanges take place on regular bases and the project’s implementation is easy Clarity in communication Communication is not clear Communication is rarely clear Communication is clear enough Communication is clear Communication is very clear Working meetings productivity for the project Working meetings are not productive Working meetings are rarelyproductive Working meetings are productive enough Working meetings are productive Working meetings are veryproductive c. ACTIVITIES 1 2 3 4 5 Adherence of planned activities to objectives Planned activities do not respond to the project’s objectives Planned activities onlu partially respond to the project’s objectives Planned activities respond quite enough to the project’s objectives Planned activities respond to the project’s objectives Planned activities totally respond to the project’s objectives
- 4. Processes interms of 3. motivation Motivation is very poor Motivation is poor Motivation is sufficient Motivation is good Motivation is very good 4. operativity Operativity is very poor Operativity is poor Operativity is sufficient Operativity is good Operatività is very good Processes in terms of 3. Products/outputs Products/outputs are very poor and of low quality Most of the products/outputs are poor and low quality Products/outputs are good enough Products/outputs are good Products/outputs are very good and of high quality 4. behaviours d. TRANSNATIONAL MEETINGS Adherence of the organized activities to the projects’ objectives The organized activities are not related to the project’s objectives The organized activities are rarely related to the project’s objectives The organized activities are sufficiently related to the project’s objectives The organized activities are well related to the project’s objectives The organized activities are very well related to the project’s objectives Productivity during the the transnational workshops Workshops are not productive Workshops are only partially productive Workshops are sufficiently productive Workshops’ productivity is good Workshops’ productivity is very good