The document discusses balancing conflicting interests within the law. It presents a scenario where Peter Hain or Tony Blair must decide whether to release 400 IRA prisoners in an effort to secure peace in Northern Ireland. Balancing conflicting interests involves ruling in favor of one party's interests over another when their interests conflict. The author analyzed Roscoe Pound's theory that social interests will always outweigh individual interests due to biases in the legal system. The aim of the project was to examine if Pound's view remains valid today. Through research and case studies, the author concluded Pound's view is not fully supported, particularly in regards to human rights where individual interests often prevail over social interests.

1. Balancing Conflicting Interests Within
The Law
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIFSQQd
2t1k

2. What Would You do?
Imagine you are Peter Hain or Tony Blair and you want to reach an agreement that
will hopefully bring peace in Northern Ireland.
One of the concessions you have been asked to make is the release of 400 IRA
prisoners and to grant them amnesty in an attempt to win support for the Good
Friday Agreement from the warring Republican and Loyalist factions.
Do you;
A) Release them and acknowledge that it is probably in the greater good as it will
hopefully bring a peace deal closer to fruition
B) Refuse. These men are terrorists and so much face the consequences of their
crimes. Not to mention that releasing these men would be viewed as an insult
by the families of the victims.

3. What Exactly Is Balancing Conflicting
Interests?
Balancing Conflicting Interests (BCI) is essentially the idea that
everybody in society, including institutions such as corporations or
governments, have rights/interests which occasionally compete with
one another.
When these interests conflict, the Law must rule in favour of one
party’s interests over another party’s interests.
The debate surrounding this topic is how should the Law effectively
balance these conflicting interests? Should the Law rule authoritatively
that one party’s interests be subordinated to others? Or should the Law
try to balance them equally and attempt to reach a compromise?

4. Aims and Objectives Of My Project
In my essay I analysed the theories of the famous legal
mind: Roscoe Pound. Pound’s theory regarding
balancing conflicting interests was that Individual and
Social interests should never compete with one
another as social interests will always triumph over
individual interests due to natural biases in the legal
system.
The aim of my project was to examine this view and
see if it has any validity; and if so, then is it still relevant
in modern society?

5. Planning
My first action was to gain an understanding of the
concept of balancing conflicting interests.
Since I have never studied the topic before, it was
completely knew to me. As a result,
the first stage of my plan was to read up on the
subject.
Secondly, I did some research and note taking on
different legal perspectives. This included Karl Marx
as well as Roscoe Pound to enhance my view on the
topic as a whole.
I also knew that my essay would largely comprise of
key cases that would act as the core of argument
and from which my essay would be built around.

6. Research
After I had done my planning and gotten a firm understanding of the
concept of the subject, my next step was to conduct research into
whether Pound’s view was actually valid.
This largely comprised of finding examples of legal cases that either
supported his view or discredited it.
For this, my main source used was Law For AQA by Catherine Elliot and
Francis Quinn as it contained ample cases that were massively helpful
and relevant to my project.
For my final paragraph on Human Rights and focusing solely on
contemporary examples within the past 30 years I scoured the internet
finding the most recent examples as not enough useful literature yet
exists about balancing conflicting interests in a Human Rights context in
the past 30 years!

7. Research Findings…
During my research, I noticed a general trend that cases were often being won by
individuals and not by social interests when they conflicted with one another.
As a result of this, I came to the conclusion that Pound’s view is not valid as there is
a magnitude of cases that discredit his thinking.
I noted that Pound tended to be wrong more so in the field of Human Rights than
in any other aspect of Law I looked at. I concluded in my essay that this is arguably
due to the increasing emphasis on the rights of individuals and the cultural shift in
Western society that celebrated individualism that occurred post WW2.

8. Positives and Areas of Strength During My
Project
I believe that a definite key strength of my project was my
research. Once I located relevant sources it was easy to extract the
information and apply it to my essay in a critical and interesting
way.
Furthermore, my project was planned and managed effectively. I
made sure to keep updated with my Supervisor to make sure that
the project remained on track and that I was making good
progress.
In particular I believe the strongest feature of my project was my
paragraph concerning Human Rights in the modern age, as it
required a good amount of research to find relevant cases as not
all of the information is readily available. For example the
information relating to Guantanamo Bay.

9. What could be improved…
One of the challenges of my project was my initial trouble in finding sources. Due to the nature of
my project title being a very specific question it was difficult to find sufficient information to begin
formulating my essay at first.
However this was overcome with the help of my Supervisor who got me started with key books and
material that gave me the starting momentum I needed to continue my own research.
Also, at the very beginning of my project I had problems with my original hypothesis which
concentrated balancing interests in relation to counter terrorism. I decided to scrap this hypothesis
and create a new one that covered a broader area of Law as balancing interests in relation soley to
counter terrorism was too narrow of a topic for a 5,000 word essay.

10. What Have I Gained From EPQ?
I have seriously developed my research skills which I believe will
only benefit me positively, especially since I plan to go to
University to study Law later this year.
I have also gained a stronger academic insight into how the Law
operates and I have expanded upon my knowledge of the
British and International legal systems.
I believe the project has overall been a huge success and has
begun to prepare me for essay writing/research in a University
environment.