Inktank presents Ceph, a scalable, open-source storage solution that addresses challenges faced by traditional RAID systems by offering software-based, self-managing architecture on commodity hardware. Ceph's advantages include enhanced reliability, parallel data recovery, and flexible storage capabilities for various application types, significantly reducing costs compared to enterprise RAID solutions. The document outlines Ceph's architecture, innovations, and provides resources for further exploration and support.

1. Inktank
Delivering the Future of Storage
The End of RAID as you know it with Ceph Replication
March 28, 2013

2. Agenda
l Intank and Ceph Introduction
l Ceph Technology
l Challenges of Raid
l Ceph Advantages
l Q&A
l Resources and Moving Forward

3. • Company that provides • Distributed unified object,
professional services and block and file storage
support for Ceph
platform
• Founded in 2011
• Created by storage
• Funded by DreamHost experts
• Mark Shuttleworth • Open source
invested $1M
• In the Linux Kernel
• Sage Weil, CTO and
creator of Ceph • Integrated into Cloud
Platforms

4. Ceph Technology Overview

5. Ceph Technological Foundations
Ceph was built with the following goals:
• Every component must scale
• There can be no single points of failure
• The solution must be software-based, not an appliance
• Must be open source
• Should run on readily-available, commodity hardware
• Everything must self-manage wherever possible
5

6. Ceph Innovations
CRUSH data placement algorithm
Algorithm is infrastructure aware and quickly adjusts to failures
Data location is computed rather than locked up
Enables clients to directly directly communicate with servers that store their data
Enables clients to perform parallel I/O for greatly enhanced throughput
Reliable Autonomic Distributed Object Store
Storage devices assume complete responsibility for data integrity
They operate independently, in parallel, without central choreography
Very efficient. Very fast. Very scalable.
CephFS Distributed Metadata Server
Highly scalable to large numbers of active/active metadata servers and high throughput
Highly reliable and available, with full Posix semantics and consistency guarantees
Has both a FUSE client and a client fully integrated into the Linux kernel
Advanced Virtual Block Device
Enterprise storage capabilities from utility server hardware
Thin Provisioned, Allocate-on-Write Snapshots, LUN cloning
In the Linux kernel and integrated with OpenStack components

7. Unified Storage Platform
Object
• Archival and backup storage
• Primary data storage
• S3-like storage
• Web services and platforms
• Application development
Block
• SAN replacement
• Virtual block device, VM images
File
• HPC
• Posix-compatible applications

8. Ceph Unified Storage Platform
OBJECTS VIRTUAL DISKS FILES & DIRECTORIES
CEPH CEPH CEPH
GATEWAY BLOCK DEVICE FILE SYSTEM
A powerful S3- and Swift- A distributed virtual block A distributed, scale-out
compatible gateway that device that delivers high- filesystem with POSIX
brings the power of the performance, cost-effective semantics that provides
Ceph Object Store to storage for virtual machines storage for a legacy and
modern applications and legacy applications modern applications
CEPH OBJECT STORE
A reliable, easy to manage, next-generation distributed object
store that provides storage of unstructured data for applications

9. RADOS Cluster Makeup
OSD OSD OSD OSD OSD
RADOS
Node
btrfs
FS FS FS FS FS xfs
ext4
DISK DISK DISK DISK DISK
RADOS M M M
Cluster
9

10. RADOS Object Storage Daemons
Intelligent Storage Servers
• Serve stored objects to clients
• OSD is primary for some objects
• Responsible for replication
• Responsible for coherency
• Responsible for re-balancing
• Responsible for recovery
• OSD is secondary for some objects
• Under control of primary
• Capable of becoming primary
• Supports extended object classes
• Atomic transactions
• Synchronization and notifications
• Send computation to the data
10

11. CRUSH
Pseudo-random placement
algorithm
• Deterministic function of
inputs
• Clients can compute data
location
Rule-based configuration
• Desired/required replica
count
• Affinity/distribution rules
• Infrastructure topology
• Weighting
Excellent data distribution
• Declustered placement
• Excellent data re-distribution
• Migration proportional to
change
11

12. CLIENT
??
12

13. RADOS Monitors
Stewards of the Cluster
M
• Distributed consensus (Paxos)
• Odd number required (quorum)
• Maintain/distribute cluster map
• Authentication/key servers
• Monitors are not in the data path
• Clients talk directly to OSDs
13

14. RAID and its Challenges
14

15. Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks
Enhanced Reliability
• RAID-1 mirroring
• RAID-5/6 parity (reduced overhead)
• Automated recovery
Enhanced Performance
• RAID-0 striping
• SAN interconnects
• Enterprise SAS drives
• Proprietary H/W RAID controllers
Economical Storage Solutions
• Software RAID implementations
• iSCSI and JBODs
Enhanced Capacity
• Logical volume concatenation
15

16. RAID Challenges: Capacity/Speed
• Storage economies in disks come from more GB per spindle
• NRE rates are flat (typically estimated at 10E-15/bit)
• 4% chance of NRE while recovering a 4+1 RAID-5 set
and it goes up with the number of volumes in the set
many RAID controllers fail the recovery after an NRE
• Access speed has not kept up with density increases
• 27 hours to rebuild a 4+1 RAID-5 set at 20MB/s
during which time a second drive can fail
• Managing the risk of second failures requires hot-spares
• Defeating some of the savings from parity
redundancy

17. RAID Challenges: Expansion
• The next generation of disks will be larger and cost less per
GB. We would like to use these as we expand
• Most RAID replication schemes require identical disk meaning
new disks cannot be added to an old set meaning failed disks
must be replaced with identical units
• Proprietary appliances may require replacements from
manufacturer (at much higher than commodity prices)
• Many storage systems reach a limit beyond which they
cannot be further expanded (e.g. fork-lift upgrade)
• Re-balancing existing data over new volumes is non-trivial

18. RAID Challenges: Reliability/Availability
• RAID-5 can only survive a single disk failure
• The odds of an NRE during recovery are significant
• Odds of a second failure during recovery are non-negligible
• Annual peta-byte durability for RAID-5 is only 3 nines
• RAID-6 redundancy protects against two disk failures
• Odds of an NRE during recovery are still significant
• Client data access will be starved out during recovery
• Throttling recovery increases the risk of data loss
• Even RAID-6 can't protect against:
• Server failures
• NIC failures
• Switch failures
• OS crashes
• Facility or regional disasters

19. RAID Challenges: Expense
Capital Expenses … good RAID costs
• Significant mark-up for enterprise hardware
• High performance RAID controllers can add $50-100/disk
• SANs further increase
• Expensive equipment, much of which is often poorly used
• Software RAID is much less expensive, and much slower
Operating Expenses … RAID doesn't manage itself
• RAID group, LUN and pool management
• Lots of application-specific tunable parameters
• Difficult expansion and migration
• When a recovery goes bad, it goes very bad
• Don't even think about putting off replacing a failed drive

20. Ceph Advantages

21. Ceph VALUE PROPOSITION
• Open source
• Runs on commodity hardware
SAVES MONEY • Runs in heterogeneous
environments
• Self-managing
SAVES TIME • OK to batch drive replacements
• Emerging platform integration
• Object, block, & filesystem storage
INCREASES FLEXIBILITY • Highly adaptable software solution
• Easier deployment of new services
• No vendor lock in
LOWERS RISK • Rule configurable failure-zones
• Improved reliability and availability

22. Ceph Advantage: Declustered Placement
• Consider a failed 2TB RAID mirror
• We must copy 2TB from the survivor to the successor
• Survivor and successor are likely in same failure zone
• Consider two RADOS objects clustered on the same primary
• Surviving copies are declustered (on different secondaries)
• New copies will be declustered (on different successors)
• Copy 10GB from each of 200 survivors to 200 successors
• Survivors and successors are in different failure zones
• Benefits
• Recovery is parallel and 200x faster
• Service can continue during the recovery process
• Exposure to 2nd failures is reduced by 200x
• Zone aware placement protects against higher level failures
• Recovery is automatic and does not await new drives
• No idle hot-spares are required

23. CLIENT
??
23

24. Ceph Advantage: Object Granularity
• Consider a failed 2TB RAID mirror
• To recover it we must read and write (at least) 2TB
• Successor must be same size as failed volume
• An error in recovery will probably lose the file system
• Consider a failed RADOS OSD
• To recover it we must read and write thousands of objects
• Successor OSDs must have each have some free space
• An error in recovery will probably lose one object
• Benefits
• Heterogeneous commodity disks are easily supported
• Better and more uniform space utilization
• Per-object updates always preserve causality ordering
• Object updates are more easily replicated over WAN links
• Greatly reduced data loss if errors do occur

25. Ceph Advantage: Intelligent Storage
• Intelligent OSDs automatically rebalance data
• When new nodes are added
• When old nodes fail or are decommissioned
• When placement policies are changed
• The resulting rebalancing is very good:
• Even distribution of data across all OSDs
• Uniform mix of old and new data across all OSDs
• Moves only as much data as required
• Intelligent OSDs continuously scrub their objects
• To detect and correct silent write errors before another failure
• This architecture scales from petabytes to exabytes
• A single pool of thin provisioned, self-managing storage
• Serving a wide range of block, object, and file clients

26. Ceph Advantage: Price
• Can leverage commodity hardware for lowest costs
• Not locked in to single vendor; get best deal over time
• RAID not required, leading to lower component costs
Enterprise RAID Ceph Replication
Raw $/GB $3 $0.50
Protected $/GB $4 (RAID6 6+2) $1.50 (3 copies)
Usable (90%) $4.44 $1.67
Replicated $8.88 (Main + Bkup) $1.67 (3 copies)
Relative Expense 533% storage cost Baseline (100%)

27. Q&A

28. Leverage great online resources
Documentation on the Ceph web site:
• http://ceph.com/docs/master/
Blogs from Inktank and the Ceph community:
• http://www.inktank.com/news-events/blog/
• http://ceph.com/community/blog/
Developer resources:
• http://ceph.com/resources/development/
• http://ceph.com/resources/mailing-list-irc/
• http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-
systems.ceph.devel

29. 29
Leverage Ceph Expert Support
Inktank will partner with you for complex deployments
• Solution design and Proof-of-Concept
• Solution customization
• Capacity planning
• Performance optimization
Having access to expert support is a production best practice
• Troubleshooting
• Debugging
A full description of our services can be found at the following:
Consulting Services: http://www.inktank.com/consulting-services/
Support Subscriptions: http://www.inktank.com/support-services/

30. Check out our upcoming webinars
Ceph Unified Storage for OpenStack
• April 4, 2013
• 10:00AM PT, 12:00PM CT, 1:00PM ET
Technical Deep Dive Into Ceph Object Storage
• April 10, 2013
• 10:00AM PT, 12:00PM CT, 1:00PM ET
Register today at:
http://www.inktank.com/news-events/webinars/

31. Contact Us
Info@inktank.com
1-855-INKTANK
Don’t forget to follow us on:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/inktank
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/inktank
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/inktankstorage

32. Thank you for joining!