Double Trace Flows in dS/CFT
Diptarka Das
University of Kentucky
work with Sumit R. Das & Gautam Mandal
Great Lakes 2013

18th May 2013
Outline
Observation
The conformal group in d Euclidean dim is isomorphic to the Isometry
group in EAdSd+1 or dSd+1 .

Question
Do EAdS/CFT and dS/CFT (if it exists) capture the differences ? i.e.,
Given a gravity theory in EAdS or in dS will it predict different behaviors
of the dual Euclidean CFTs ? The objective is to make this question
more precise.

Content
1. Introduction
2. The dS/CFT dictionary
3. Holographic RG
4. Concluding remarks
Introduction

We focus on the Poincare patch of dSd+1 where, ds 2 =
Here, −∞ ≤ T ≤ 0, we will work in τ = −T .

L2
dS
T2

( dT 2 + dx 2 )
Introduction
There is a time-evolving wavefunction Ψ which is defined as,
Dφ(τ, x)exp (iS )

Ψ[φ0 (x), ] =
φ( ,x)=φ0 (x)

And it follows the real time evolution equation ( Schrodinger equation )
iGN

∂
˜
˜
ΨUV (φ, τ ) = H(τ )ΨUV (φ, τ )
∂τ

If there exists a dS/CFT correspondence then
< exp ρ

d d x (cut-off)−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x) >st = Ψ[φ0 (x), ]

where,
ρ≡

Ld−1
dS
GN

∆± = d/2 ± ν, ν ≡

d 2 /4 − m2 L2
dS

We shall see a natural choice for the cut-off will be i .
Introduction

dS/CFT correspondence states
< exp ρ

d d x (i )−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x) >st = Ψ[φ0 (x), ]

when we do the semi-classical calculation of the R.H.S we shall see why
the factors in the L.H.S are natural.
By Faulkner, Liu, Rangamani[arXiv:1010.4036 [hep-th]] and Heemskerk, Polchinski
parameters of Ψ are related to the couplings. In
particular the HJ limit of the Schrodinger equation gives the RG flow
equations.
[arXiv:1010.1264 [hep-th]]
Introduction
O2 deformation
We consider double trace deformation ( O2 ) of the CFT in d Euclidean
dimensions, ∆ is the dimension of O and 2ν = 2∆ − d
S → S0 +

f0
2

d d xO(x)2

We will consider relevant deformations, i.e, dim[O2 ] = 2∆− < d. Large
N arguments yield,
βλ = µ

dλ(µ)
= −2νλ + 2νbλ2
dµ

where,
f (µ) = λ(µ)µ2ν ,

O(k1 )O(k2 )

0

= G0 (k) = bk −2ν

Thus λ is dimensionless and b has the sign of the two point function. We
shall see how the same expression can be derived using holography.
The dS/CFT dictionary - Calculation of Ψ

We have
Ψ[φ0 (x), ] ∼ exp[iSon ]
The solution respecting the Bunch-Davies condition is
φ(τ, k) =

τ

d/2

(2)

Hν (kτ )
(2)

Hν (k )
iSon = −

i
2GN

At early times, k| |

φ0 (k)

(2)

[dk] Ld−1
dS

k Hν−1 (k )
∆−
+
φ0 (k)φ0 (−k)
d
(2)
( )
( )d Hν (k )

1 this becomes a bunch of harmonic oscillators
The dS/CFT dictionary
At late times k| |
iSon = −i

ρ2
2

[dk]

1
∆−
ρ2
φ (k)φ0 (−k)+
d 0
( )
2

[dk]φ0 (k)φ0 (−k)(i )−2∆− H(k)

where
H(k) = (i)d−1 −2ν

Γ(1 − ν)
Γ(1 + ν)

k
2

2ν

Now when we define,
exp ρ

d d x (i )−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x)

st

= Ψ[φ0 (x), ]

Then Gst (k) = H(k). This agrees with the analytic continuation from
AdS. [Harlow, Stanford arXiv:1104.2621 [hep-th]]. And now there is only one
consistent alternative prescription which yields
O− O−

dS
alt

=−

1
= (i)d−1 O− O−
(2ν)2 Gst.

AdS
alt
The dS/CFT dictionary

The alternative quantization prescription ( factors in the Legendre
transform ) turns out to be
< exp

d d xJ(x)O− (x) >alt

=
×

Dφ0 (x) < exp ρ
exp ρ

dd x

J(x)
(i )−∆− φ0 (x)
2ν

From G0 (k) = bk −2ν we can now identify b as,
b=

d d x(i )−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x) >st

22ν i 1−d Γ(1 + ν)
2ν Γ(1 − ν)
Holographic RG - Set-up
We follow the procedure developed in Heemskerk, Polchinski. We start
off by putting a floating cut-off at τ = . Then
Ψ[φ0 (x), ] =

˜
˜
˜
Dφ(x)ΨIR [φ, ]ΨUV [φ, φ0 ]

where
˜
˜
ΨIR [φ] = Ψ[φ(x), ]
˜
and from cut-off independence, ΨUV [φ, φ0 ] follows,
iGN

∂
˜
˜
ΨUV (φ, ) = H( )ΨUV (φ, )
∂

The idea is now to obtain an effective action of the dual theory at a finite
˜
cutoff by extending the dS/CFT relationship for ΨIR [φ, ],
e −Seff (

)

alt

=

˜
Dφ(x)

˜
DJ(x) ΨUV [φ, φ0 ]

exp −ρ
exp

dd x

J(x)
(i
2ν

˜
)−∆− φ(x)

d d xJ(x)O− (x)

alt
Holographic RG - Results
˜
We take a general quadratic form for ΨUV [φ, φ0 ] = exp[iK ], where
K=

1
GN

LdS

d

ddx −

1
˜
˜
g ( )φ2 + h( )φ + c( )
2LdS

The HJ equation gives,
−β(g ) = (i )

∂g
= g 2 + dg + m2 L2
dS
∂(i )

The zeroes of β(g ) are at g± = −∆± and alternative quantization means
we have to expand the coupling as
g = g− + δg
The beta function for δg is given by
β(δg ) = −(i )

∂δg
= −2ν(δg ) − (δg )2
∂(i )
Holographic RG - Results
The dS/CFT prescription gives us the relation,
f = −(i)d−1 (i )−2ν (2ν)2 g = −(i)d−1 (cut − off )2ν (2ν)2 g
Recall
f (µ) = λ(µ)µ2ν
Thus we can identify,
λ = −(i)d−1 (2ν)2 δg
For d = 3 we get,
β(λ) = −2νλ − λ2
This is the double trace coupling beta function for the Sp(n) theory in 3
dimensions. [LeClair, Neubert arXiv:0705.4657 [hep-th]]. Thus it agrees with the
proposed conjecture that the dual of dS4 is a SP(n) CFT3 . [Anninos,
Hartman, Strominger arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]]
When we use our result for b, the d-dimensional β function becomes
β(λ) = −2νλ + b

2−2ν Γ(1 − ν) 2
λ
2ν Γ(1 + ν)

Thus we recover the result which followed from the large N arguments in
the field theory side.
Results from AdS
From the AdS/CFT prescription, we have
bAdS =

22ν Γ(1 + ν)
2ν Γ(1 − ν)

The radial evolution equation satisfied by ΨUV ,AdS is
GN

∂
˜
˜
ΨUV ,AdS (φ, ) = −HAdS ( )ΨUV ,AdS (φ, )
∂( )

The form
ΨUV ,AdS = exp −

1
GN

LAdS

d

dd x

1
˜
˜
g ( )φ2 − h ( )φ − c ( )
2LAdS

leads to the flow equation
∂g
= −(g )2 + dg + m2 L2
AdS
∂

The flow equation for the departure from the fixed point δg is
β(δg ) = −

∂δg
= −2ν(δg ) + (δg )2
∂
Results from AdS

The relationship between the field theory dimensionless coupling and δg
is
λ = (2ν)2 δg = (2ν)22ν

Γ(1 + ν) 1
δg
Γ(1 − ν) bAdS

which leads once again to a beta function of the expected form.
Conclusions

dS/CFT allows us to calculate field theory β functions. For the double
trace case, the sign of the quadratic term in the β function equation
depends on the sign of the normalized two point function, i.e, b. Since
the treatment is quite general it will be interesting to see what happens
for multitrace deformations.
We saw from the direct on-shell action calculation that there is an overall
factor of (i)d−1 in front of the action. This is the same factor which
appears upon analytic continuation LAdS → iLdS from the AdS action.
This difference of phase has also been noticed in the collective action of
O(n) and Sp(n) which in d = 3 resulted in a overall minus sign.[ D.D, S.
R. Das, A. Jevicki, Q. Ye arXiv:1205.5776 [hep-th]]
The dS dual field theory cut-off was naturally identified with i .

Talk5

  • 1.
    Double Trace Flowsin dS/CFT Diptarka Das University of Kentucky work with Sumit R. Das & Gautam Mandal Great Lakes 2013 18th May 2013
  • 2.
    Outline Observation The conformal groupin d Euclidean dim is isomorphic to the Isometry group in EAdSd+1 or dSd+1 . Question Do EAdS/CFT and dS/CFT (if it exists) capture the differences ? i.e., Given a gravity theory in EAdS or in dS will it predict different behaviors of the dual Euclidean CFTs ? The objective is to make this question more precise. Content 1. Introduction 2. The dS/CFT dictionary 3. Holographic RG 4. Concluding remarks
  • 3.
    Introduction We focus onthe Poincare patch of dSd+1 where, ds 2 = Here, −∞ ≤ T ≤ 0, we will work in τ = −T . L2 dS T2 ( dT 2 + dx 2 )
  • 4.
    Introduction There is atime-evolving wavefunction Ψ which is defined as, Dφ(τ, x)exp (iS ) Ψ[φ0 (x), ] = φ( ,x)=φ0 (x) And it follows the real time evolution equation ( Schrodinger equation ) iGN ∂ ˜ ˜ ΨUV (φ, τ ) = H(τ )ΨUV (φ, τ ) ∂τ If there exists a dS/CFT correspondence then < exp ρ d d x (cut-off)−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x) >st = Ψ[φ0 (x), ] where, ρ≡ Ld−1 dS GN ∆± = d/2 ± ν, ν ≡ d 2 /4 − m2 L2 dS We shall see a natural choice for the cut-off will be i .
  • 5.
    Introduction dS/CFT correspondence states <exp ρ d d x (i )−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x) >st = Ψ[φ0 (x), ] when we do the semi-classical calculation of the R.H.S we shall see why the factors in the L.H.S are natural. By Faulkner, Liu, Rangamani[arXiv:1010.4036 [hep-th]] and Heemskerk, Polchinski parameters of Ψ are related to the couplings. In particular the HJ limit of the Schrodinger equation gives the RG flow equations. [arXiv:1010.1264 [hep-th]]
  • 6.
    Introduction O2 deformation We considerdouble trace deformation ( O2 ) of the CFT in d Euclidean dimensions, ∆ is the dimension of O and 2ν = 2∆ − d S → S0 + f0 2 d d xO(x)2 We will consider relevant deformations, i.e, dim[O2 ] = 2∆− < d. Large N arguments yield, βλ = µ dλ(µ) = −2νλ + 2νbλ2 dµ where, f (µ) = λ(µ)µ2ν , O(k1 )O(k2 ) 0 = G0 (k) = bk −2ν Thus λ is dimensionless and b has the sign of the two point function. We shall see how the same expression can be derived using holography.
  • 7.
    The dS/CFT dictionary- Calculation of Ψ We have Ψ[φ0 (x), ] ∼ exp[iSon ] The solution respecting the Bunch-Davies condition is φ(τ, k) = τ d/2 (2) Hν (kτ ) (2) Hν (k ) iSon = − i 2GN At early times, k| | φ0 (k) (2) [dk] Ld−1 dS k Hν−1 (k ) ∆− + φ0 (k)φ0 (−k) d (2) ( ) ( )d Hν (k ) 1 this becomes a bunch of harmonic oscillators
  • 8.
    The dS/CFT dictionary Atlate times k| | iSon = −i ρ2 2 [dk] 1 ∆− ρ2 φ (k)φ0 (−k)+ d 0 ( ) 2 [dk]φ0 (k)φ0 (−k)(i )−2∆− H(k) where H(k) = (i)d−1 −2ν Γ(1 − ν) Γ(1 + ν) k 2 2ν Now when we define, exp ρ d d x (i )−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x) st = Ψ[φ0 (x), ] Then Gst (k) = H(k). This agrees with the analytic continuation from AdS. [Harlow, Stanford arXiv:1104.2621 [hep-th]]. And now there is only one consistent alternative prescription which yields O− O− dS alt =− 1 = (i)d−1 O− O− (2ν)2 Gst. AdS alt
  • 9.
    The dS/CFT dictionary Thealternative quantization prescription ( factors in the Legendre transform ) turns out to be < exp d d xJ(x)O− (x) >alt = × Dφ0 (x) < exp ρ exp ρ dd x J(x) (i )−∆− φ0 (x) 2ν From G0 (k) = bk −2ν we can now identify b as, b= d d x(i )−∆− φ0 (x)O+ (x) >st 22ν i 1−d Γ(1 + ν) 2ν Γ(1 − ν)
  • 10.
    Holographic RG -Set-up We follow the procedure developed in Heemskerk, Polchinski. We start off by putting a floating cut-off at τ = . Then Ψ[φ0 (x), ] = ˜ ˜ ˜ Dφ(x)ΨIR [φ, ]ΨUV [φ, φ0 ] where ˜ ˜ ΨIR [φ] = Ψ[φ(x), ] ˜ and from cut-off independence, ΨUV [φ, φ0 ] follows, iGN ∂ ˜ ˜ ΨUV (φ, ) = H( )ΨUV (φ, ) ∂ The idea is now to obtain an effective action of the dual theory at a finite ˜ cutoff by extending the dS/CFT relationship for ΨIR [φ, ], e −Seff ( ) alt = ˜ Dφ(x) ˜ DJ(x) ΨUV [φ, φ0 ] exp −ρ exp dd x J(x) (i 2ν ˜ )−∆− φ(x) d d xJ(x)O− (x) alt
  • 11.
    Holographic RG -Results ˜ We take a general quadratic form for ΨUV [φ, φ0 ] = exp[iK ], where K= 1 GN LdS d ddx − 1 ˜ ˜ g ( )φ2 + h( )φ + c( ) 2LdS The HJ equation gives, −β(g ) = (i ) ∂g = g 2 + dg + m2 L2 dS ∂(i ) The zeroes of β(g ) are at g± = −∆± and alternative quantization means we have to expand the coupling as g = g− + δg The beta function for δg is given by β(δg ) = −(i ) ∂δg = −2ν(δg ) − (δg )2 ∂(i )
  • 12.
    Holographic RG -Results The dS/CFT prescription gives us the relation, f = −(i)d−1 (i )−2ν (2ν)2 g = −(i)d−1 (cut − off )2ν (2ν)2 g Recall f (µ) = λ(µ)µ2ν Thus we can identify, λ = −(i)d−1 (2ν)2 δg For d = 3 we get, β(λ) = −2νλ − λ2 This is the double trace coupling beta function for the Sp(n) theory in 3 dimensions. [LeClair, Neubert arXiv:0705.4657 [hep-th]]. Thus it agrees with the proposed conjecture that the dual of dS4 is a SP(n) CFT3 . [Anninos, Hartman, Strominger arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]] When we use our result for b, the d-dimensional β function becomes β(λ) = −2νλ + b 2−2ν Γ(1 − ν) 2 λ 2ν Γ(1 + ν) Thus we recover the result which followed from the large N arguments in the field theory side.
  • 13.
    Results from AdS Fromthe AdS/CFT prescription, we have bAdS = 22ν Γ(1 + ν) 2ν Γ(1 − ν) The radial evolution equation satisfied by ΨUV ,AdS is GN ∂ ˜ ˜ ΨUV ,AdS (φ, ) = −HAdS ( )ΨUV ,AdS (φ, ) ∂( ) The form ΨUV ,AdS = exp − 1 GN LAdS d dd x 1 ˜ ˜ g ( )φ2 − h ( )φ − c ( ) 2LAdS leads to the flow equation ∂g = −(g )2 + dg + m2 L2 AdS ∂ The flow equation for the departure from the fixed point δg is β(δg ) = − ∂δg = −2ν(δg ) + (δg )2 ∂
  • 14.
    Results from AdS Therelationship between the field theory dimensionless coupling and δg is λ = (2ν)2 δg = (2ν)22ν Γ(1 + ν) 1 δg Γ(1 − ν) bAdS which leads once again to a beta function of the expected form.
  • 15.
    Conclusions dS/CFT allows usto calculate field theory β functions. For the double trace case, the sign of the quadratic term in the β function equation depends on the sign of the normalized two point function, i.e, b. Since the treatment is quite general it will be interesting to see what happens for multitrace deformations. We saw from the direct on-shell action calculation that there is an overall factor of (i)d−1 in front of the action. This is the same factor which appears upon analytic continuation LAdS → iLdS from the AdS action. This difference of phase has also been noticed in the collective action of O(n) and Sp(n) which in d = 3 resulted in a overall minus sign.[ D.D, S. R. Das, A. Jevicki, Q. Ye arXiv:1205.5776 [hep-th]] The dS dual field theory cut-off was naturally identified with i .