Dr_Kamala_Rani_PPT_-_NIRF_-_2021_India_Rankings_COLLEGES_v2.pptx

Collegiate Education & Technical Education
Department, Government of Telangana
Institute For Academic Excellence
Hyderabad
National Workshop NIRF INDIA RANKINGS – 2021 For Higher Educational Institutions Awareness Programme 18th & 19th January 2021 1
KAB Educational Consultants
Hyderabad
WELCOME
HEURISTICS FOR FUTURE – NIRF PERSPECTIVE
Dr. M. Kamala Rani
PhD.,M.Phil.,M.Com,
MHRM, M.A.(Psychology),PGDGC MCJ and MBA
Chief Academic Guidance Officer
Institute for Academic Excellence(IAE),
Hyderabad

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Outline
•To provide a clear understanding of all parameters and data
required to calculate them.
•Preview of how data inputs to DCS will reflect in final score.
Intro
•To demonstrate the individual data points on NIRF score.
•Use existing data to quantify various parameters of NIRF
Demo
•To help institutions to develop a heuristic model to take
strategic decisions on policies to better align to areas for
score improvement.
Heuristics

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Challenges
Processed data after
verification and
authentication
approved by core
committee is not
available in public
domain.
NIRF does not disclose
the functions except
that it is a relative
evaluation rather than
absolute scoring.
Predefined thresholds
and bench marks are
not available.

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Category-specific
and domain -
specific metrics.
5 broad generic
parameters.
16 to 18 sub
parameters.
About 110 data
entry fields in the
DCS.
Drivers

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Performance of Top 5 Colleges across all Parameters
COMPARISON ACROSS PARAMETERS
1 2 3 4 5

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Performance of Top 5 Colleges across Sub-Parameters
Teaching Learning & Resources(TLR)
COMPARISON ACROSS SUB PARAMETERS
1 2 3 4 5

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Research and Professional Practice(RPC)
1 2 3 4 5

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Graduation Outcomes(GO)
1 2 3 4 5

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Outreach and Inclusivity(OI)
1 2 3 4 5

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Performance of Colleges Ranked 96-100 in all Parameters
COMPARISON ACROSS PARAMETERS
96 97 98 99 100

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Performance of Colleges Ranked 96-100 across Sub-Parameters
Teaching Learning & Resources(TLR)
96 97 98 99 100

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Research and Professional Practice(RPC)
96 97 98 99 100

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Graduation Outcomes(GO)
96 97 98 99 100

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Outreach and Inclusivity (OI)
96 97 98 99 100

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Rank vs. Score
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 80 84 87 90 93 96 99
SCORE
RANK
Colleges
Score

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
KEY SUB PARAMETERS BY WEIGHTS
S.No. Parameter Sub Parameter Engineering Medical Pharmacy Law Mgmt Architecture College Overall
1 TLR
SS 6 6 6 8 6 8 8 6
FSR 9 9 9 12 9 12 12 9
FQE 6 6 6 8 6 8 8 6
FRU 9 9 9 12 9 12 12 9
2 RP
PU 11 12 11 8 12 12 11 11
QP 12 12 12 5 12 4 5 11
IPR 5 3 5 0 0 0 0 5
FPPP 3 3 3 3 6 4 0 5
3 GO
GPH 8 6 8 10 8 8 10 12
GUE 3 6 3 4 4 6 10 8
GMS 5 0 5 6 8 6 5 0
GPHD 4 6 4 5 0 0 0 0
GSS 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
4 OI
RD 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
WD 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
ESCS 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
PCS 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
5 Perception Precp 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Main Contributors to Final Score
SS, 8
FSR, 12
FQE, 8
FRU, 12
PU, 11
GPH, 10
GUE, 10
Contributions %
SS
FSR
FQE
FRU
PU
GPH
GUE

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
S.No Parameter Sub parameter Input values which influence the score
1 TLR
SS 8 % NT ( intake) , NE ( admitted)
FSR 12% N ( intake NT + NE ) , F ( Total Faculty)
FQE 8%
FRA ( Percentage of No. of PhDs in staff) , F1 , F2, F3 ( Fraction of faculty with experience
w.r.t 8 Yrs, 8 to 15 Yrs&> 15 Yrs
FRU 12%
Average annual capital expenditure , Average annual operational expenditure & intake of
students
2 RP
PU 11% P ( Total publications in 3 calendar years) , Faculty as per 1:15 i.e intake of students / 15
QP 5% CC ( Citation count in 3 years), Faculty count as per 1 :15
3 GO
GPH 10% NP ( Students placed); Nhs ( Students going for higher studies); Total students graduated
GUE 10% Ng No. of students passing examination & Total intake (averaged over 3 years)
GMS5% Median salary in previous 3 years
4 OI
RD 3% Ns Students from other States, Nc Students from others Countries
WD 3% Women Students Nws& Women faculty Nwf
Nesc2% No. of UG students receiving reimbursement from Institution funds
PCS 2% Facilities for PC category

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON NIRF 2020 RANKING
TOTAL SCORE RANGE
S.No. RANK BAND SCORE
SS SCORE
RANGE
FSR SCORE
RANGE
FQE SCORE
RANGE
FRU SCORE
RANGE
PU SCORE RANGE QP SCORE RANGE GPH SCORE RANGE PERCEPTION SCORE RANGE
1 1-25 75.45 60.74 19.38 6.28 30 20.06 15.84 11.7 24.58 9.92 70 0.15 30 0.74 39.45 10.69 100 2.99
2 26-50 60.4 51.92 18.48 6.93 30 14.57 19.45 8.8 24.86 8.73 58.55 0 23.77 0 36.35 3.74 75.91 0
3 51-75 54.76 51.92 18.48 6.93 30 14.57 18.41 10.54 24.38 9.61 58.55 0 23.77 0 32.44 3.74 47.24 0
4 76-98 51.75 50.13 16.58 6.46 30 17.71 18.16 9.62 21.24 7.5 16.93 0.05 21.35 0.31 32.02 0.97 58.78 0

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
SS
S.No. Parameter Sub Parameter
Final
Rank
score in Sub Parameter
Rank in Sub
Parameter
Data inputs Highest Value
NT NE NT NE Score
1
TLR SS
1 16 19 3865 4108
10740 10407
19.38(
6th
ranke
d)
2 25 18.69 2 13193 12329
3 51 13.89 44 3812 3738
4 75 7.32 93 1145 838
5 100 12 60 2798 2894

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
FSR
S.No. Parameter
Sub
Parameter
Final
Rank
score in
Sub
Parame
ter
Rank in Sub
Parameter
F N 20(F/N) F N 20(F/N) Score
1
TLR FSR
1 26.73 46 263 3865 1.3609314
94 1380 1.3623188 30
2 25 20.06 91 596 13193 0.9035094
3 51 29.93 24 197 3738 1.0540396
4 75 25.67 55 49 1145 0.8558952
5 100 21.98 83 143 2798 1.0221587

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
FQE
S.No. Parameter
Sub
Parameter
Final Rank score in Sub Parameter
Rank in Sub
Parameter
FRA F1 F2 F3
1
TLR FQE
1 16.43 27 62.74 0.57 0.11 0.31
19.45(27th
ranked
institution)
2 25 11.7 78 56.04 0.44 0.07 0.48
3 51 15.74 30 60.4 0.58 0.02 0.39
4 75 13.65 54 42.85 0.32 0 0.67
5 100 12.27 72 48.25 0.45 0.08 0.46

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
FRU
S.No. Parameter
Sub
Parameter
Final
Rank
score in Sub
Parameter
Rank in Sub
Parameter
BC BO BC BO Score
1
TLR FRU
1 19.99 12 3923.34 133748.06
2801.01 235333.19 24.86
2 25 9.92 93 2523.02 32163.62
3 51 15.59 38 1600.92 86644.6
4 75 13.81 54 6038.84 50583.75
5 100 11.17 80 2138.18 31127.95

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
PU
S.No. Parameter
Sub
Parameter
Final Rank
score in Sub
Parameter
Rank in Sub
Parameter
Highest Value
Score
1
RP PU
1 37.79 6
70 (5th ranked
institution)
2 25 21.85 19
3 51 3.99 57
4 75 0.23 90
5 100 16.21 27

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
POINTS TO PONDER ON RP
• Sources of data: Institutions and Third Party Sources
In the absence of a reliable and comprehensive database that would supply
all relevant data required for computing the scores ranking, registered
institutions were invited to submit the required data through an online Data
Capturing System (DCS). Publications and citations data pertaining to research
output of applicant were taken from Scopus and Web of Science. Data on
patent published and grant was taken from Derwent Innovation. Moreover,
number of papers that appeared in the top 25 percentile of cited papers in
the world for a given disciple was taken as sub parameter for evaluating
research performance of institutions.

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Publications, Citations and Highly Cited Papers (HCP):Web of Science(WoS)
and Scopus
The databases that were used to determine the quantitative productivity of all
applicant institutions that registered themselves for ranking. The search included
number of research articles published and citations received by them in last 3 years.
• Science Citation Index – Expanded (SCI- Expanded)
• Social Sciences Citation Index(SSCI)
• Arts and Humanities Citation Index(A&HCI)
• Conference Proceeding Citation Index- Science(CPCI-S)
• Conference Proceeding Citation Index-Social Sciences and Humanities(CPCI-SSH)

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
GPH
S.No. Parameter
Sub
Parameter
Final
Rank
score in Sub
Parameter
Rank in Sub
Parameter
Np Nhs Np Nhs Score
1
GO GPH
1 31.01 13 3.86 72.14
1.47 97.79
39.45(7th
ranked
institutio
n)
2 25 22.63 53 28.05 34.35
3 51 15.79 84 9.3 40.58
4 75 24.66 42 17.17 71.8
5 100 21.07 63 23.84 58.35

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
GUE
S.No. Parameter
Sub
Parameter
Final
Rank
score in
Sub
Parameter
Rank in Sub
Parameter
Ng Ng Score
1
GO GUE
1 40 1 97.77
97.77 40
2 25 38.68 60 77.26
3 51 38.44 61 87.09
4 75 34.85 78 69.6
5 100 32.33 90 70.09

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
HEURISTIC MODEL
Points to Ponder
DF Using NT as a base and based on performance bench marks expected performance can be
generated for all the parameters.
The existing data against all parameters can be analyzed based on expected performance.
Acquire insights about how to quantify the data to better align areas of score improvement
Heuristic model can be developed based on existing data and statistical modeling to have an
estimate on the score.
In depth insight can be obtained about Institutions can take future policy decisions

Possible Benchmarks
S.No. Parameter Score Input values
1 SS 19.38
NT NE Score
10740 10407 19.38
2 FSR 30
F N 20(F/N)
94 1380 1.36
3 FQE 19.45
FRA F1 F2 F3
4 FRU 24.86
BC BO
2801.01 235333
5 PU 70
6 QP 30
7 GPH 39.45
Np Nhs Score
1.47 97.79 39.45
8 GUE 40
Ng
97.77
9 GMS 20
MS
600000
10 RD 25.81
NS NC
0.9 0.01
11 WD 30
Nws Nwf
100 81.4
12 ESCS 9.4
Nesc
23.77
13 PCS 20
14 PERCEPTION 100

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
-0.5
0
0.5
1
SS FSR FQE FRU PU QP GPHGUE MS RD WD ESCS PCS PR
Score
Sub Parameter Correlation with Score

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Impact of ‘Perception’ on Rankings
77.87
91.38
81.68
97.78
69.02
16.77
2.02
5.77
3.94
2.99
1 2 3 4 5 96 97 98 99 100
PERCEPTION

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Sub Parameter with highest weight
Perception
RD
PU
MS
QP
FRU

Hyderabad
Hyderabad

Dr_Kamala_Rani_PPT_-_NIRF_-_2021_India_Rankings_COLLEGES_v2.pptx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Dr_Kamala_Rani_PPT_-_NIRF_-_2021_India_Rankings_COLLEGES_v2.pptx

Similar to Dr_Kamala_Rani_PPT_-_NIRF_-_2021_India_Rankings_COLLEGES_v2.pptx (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Dr_Kamala_Rani_PPT_-_NIRF_-_2021_India_Rankings_COLLEGES_v2.pptx