Track 14. 9th International Workshop on Software Engineering for E-learning (ISELEAR’18)
Authors: Joaquín Gayoso-Cabada, Antonio Sarasa-Cabezuelo and José-Luis Sierra
https://youtu.be/_-kkPLGPPPI
First part of a workshop looking at industry case studies in natural language processing for From Theory to Practice Workshop (AIMS, Kigali, March 2022).
Opinion Mining Techniques for Non-English Languages: An OverviewCSCJournals
The amount of user-generated data on web is increasing day by day giving rise to necessity of automatic tools to analyze huge data and extract useful information from it. Opinion Mining is an emerging area of research concerning with extracting and analyzing opinions expressed in texts. It is a language and domain dependent task having number of applications like recommender systems, review analysis, marketing systems, etc. Early research in the field of opinion mining has concentrated on English language. Many opinion mining tools and linguistic resources have been built for English language. Availability of information in regional languages has motivated researchers to develop tools and resources for non-English languages. In this paper we present a survey on the opinion mining research for non-English languages.
Learning Objective Focused Technology Integration - Presentation at IETC 2012 that challenges participants to rethink the way they integrate technology and use the TPACK framework to build their capacities and assist in planning.
Are you interested in learning about text analysis but have little to no experience with programming languages or writing code? These two short courses will introduce you to multiple text analysis methods. We will examine real-world examples and engage in hands-on activities that don’t require running any code. These short courses are ideal for students and researchers in non-technical fields, faculty who would like to incorporate text analysis in their curriculum, or as a precursor to programming with text analysis tools.
A Gentle Introduction to Text Analysis I will cover both qualitative and quantitative text analysis methods, bag-of-words techniques and classification.
First part of a workshop looking at industry case studies in natural language processing for From Theory to Practice Workshop (AIMS, Kigali, March 2022).
Opinion Mining Techniques for Non-English Languages: An OverviewCSCJournals
The amount of user-generated data on web is increasing day by day giving rise to necessity of automatic tools to analyze huge data and extract useful information from it. Opinion Mining is an emerging area of research concerning with extracting and analyzing opinions expressed in texts. It is a language and domain dependent task having number of applications like recommender systems, review analysis, marketing systems, etc. Early research in the field of opinion mining has concentrated on English language. Many opinion mining tools and linguistic resources have been built for English language. Availability of information in regional languages has motivated researchers to develop tools and resources for non-English languages. In this paper we present a survey on the opinion mining research for non-English languages.
Learning Objective Focused Technology Integration - Presentation at IETC 2012 that challenges participants to rethink the way they integrate technology and use the TPACK framework to build their capacities and assist in planning.
Are you interested in learning about text analysis but have little to no experience with programming languages or writing code? These two short courses will introduce you to multiple text analysis methods. We will examine real-world examples and engage in hands-on activities that don’t require running any code. These short courses are ideal for students and researchers in non-technical fields, faculty who would like to incorporate text analysis in their curriculum, or as a precursor to programming with text analysis tools.
A Gentle Introduction to Text Analysis I will cover both qualitative and quantitative text analysis methods, bag-of-words techniques and classification.
Managing Ireland's Research Data - 3 Research MethodsRebecca Grant
Slides providing an overview of the research methods used in the author's thesis, "Managing Ireland's Research Data: Recognising Roles for Recordkeepers". The methods discussed are online surveys, comparative case studies, and autoethnography.
Licensed as CC-BY.
1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing.
The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar.
The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles.
Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article.
Link to peer reviewed article one:
http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341
1) APA reference for article #1
2)Introductionand core study elements
· Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed.
· Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)?
· What were the research questions?
· What were the key findings and conclusions of the study?
3) Evaluate literature reviewed
· Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing?
4) Evaluate theoretical framework
· What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study?
5) Evaluate methods
· What research method and designs are used in this study?
· How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)?
· Do the m ...
Implementation of a Knowledge Management Methodology based on Ontologies :Cas...rahulmonikasharma
in this paper, we suggest a methodology of knowledge management that makes use of the new possibilities offered by semantic web technologies and covers the various stages of the project life cycle. In fact, with this new vision of ontologies and semantic web, it is important to provide a strong methodological support in order to develop complex ontology-based systems.
A hands-on approach to digital tool criticism: Tools for (self-)reflectionMarijn Koolen
Digital tool criticism is a recent and important discussion in Digital Humanities research. We define digital tool criticism as the reflection on the role of digital tools in the research methodology and the evaluation of the suitability of a given digital tool for a specific research goal. The aim is to understand the impact of any limitation of the tool on the specific goal, not to improve a tool’s performance. That is, ensuring as a scholar to be aware of the impact of a tool on research design, methods, interpretations and outcomes. Our goal with developing digital tool criticism as a method is to help scholars better understand how research methods, tools and activities shape our interpretations. Based on our experiences with two hands-on workshops on digital tool criticism, we find that reflection on using digital tools and data in all phases of the research process is key.
Reflection urges scholars to consider digital data and tools as part of the overall research goals and design, and interdependent with other elements of research design, namely research questions and methods. As scholars go through their research process, assumptions on the research design and the connection between tools, data and questions are constantly challenged, forcing updates in the design and the interpretation of data and question.
It gives an overview of Sentiment Analysis, Natural Language Processing, Phases of Sentiment Analysis using NLP, brief idea of Machine Learning, Textblob API and related topics.
Track 4. New publishing and scientific communication ways: Electronic edition, Information metrics and digital educational resources
Authors: Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto, Maria Manuel Borges and Licinio Roque
Track 15. Communication, Education and Social Media
Authors: Rafael Galán-Arribas, Francisco-Javier Herrero-Gutiérrez, Cruz-Alberto Martínez-Arcos and Sonia Casillas-Martín
More Related Content
Similar to Document Annotation Tools: Annotation Classification Mechanisms
Managing Ireland's Research Data - 3 Research MethodsRebecca Grant
Slides providing an overview of the research methods used in the author's thesis, "Managing Ireland's Research Data: Recognising Roles for Recordkeepers". The methods discussed are online surveys, comparative case studies, and autoethnography.
Licensed as CC-BY.
1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing.
The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar.
The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles.
Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article.
Link to peer reviewed article one:
http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341
1) APA reference for article #1
2)Introductionand core study elements
· Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed.
· Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)?
· What were the research questions?
· What were the key findings and conclusions of the study?
3) Evaluate literature reviewed
· Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing?
4) Evaluate theoretical framework
· What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study?
5) Evaluate methods
· What research method and designs are used in this study?
· How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)?
· Do the m ...
Implementation of a Knowledge Management Methodology based on Ontologies :Cas...rahulmonikasharma
in this paper, we suggest a methodology of knowledge management that makes use of the new possibilities offered by semantic web technologies and covers the various stages of the project life cycle. In fact, with this new vision of ontologies and semantic web, it is important to provide a strong methodological support in order to develop complex ontology-based systems.
A hands-on approach to digital tool criticism: Tools for (self-)reflectionMarijn Koolen
Digital tool criticism is a recent and important discussion in Digital Humanities research. We define digital tool criticism as the reflection on the role of digital tools in the research methodology and the evaluation of the suitability of a given digital tool for a specific research goal. The aim is to understand the impact of any limitation of the tool on the specific goal, not to improve a tool’s performance. That is, ensuring as a scholar to be aware of the impact of a tool on research design, methods, interpretations and outcomes. Our goal with developing digital tool criticism as a method is to help scholars better understand how research methods, tools and activities shape our interpretations. Based on our experiences with two hands-on workshops on digital tool criticism, we find that reflection on using digital tools and data in all phases of the research process is key.
Reflection urges scholars to consider digital data and tools as part of the overall research goals and design, and interdependent with other elements of research design, namely research questions and methods. As scholars go through their research process, assumptions on the research design and the connection between tools, data and questions are constantly challenged, forcing updates in the design and the interpretation of data and question.
It gives an overview of Sentiment Analysis, Natural Language Processing, Phases of Sentiment Analysis using NLP, brief idea of Machine Learning, Textblob API and related topics.
Similar to Document Annotation Tools: Annotation Classification Mechanisms (20)
Track 4. New publishing and scientific communication ways: Electronic edition, Information metrics and digital educational resources
Authors: Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto, Maria Manuel Borges and Licinio Roque
Track 15. Communication, Education and Social Media
Authors: Rafael Galán-Arribas, Francisco-Javier Herrero-Gutiérrez, Cruz-Alberto Martínez-Arcos and Sonia Casillas-Martín
Track 15. Communication, Education and Social Media
Authors: Diego Cachón, Juan José Igartua, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Iñigo Guerrero and Isabel Rodríguez-de-Dios
Track 14. 9th International Workshop on Software Engineering for E-learning (ISELEAR’18)
Authors: Andrea Vázquez-Ingelmo, Francisco José
García-Peñalvo and Roberto Theron
https://youtu.be/4T87QwwQSgQ
Track 14. 9th International Workshop on Software Engineering for E-learning (ISELEAR’18)
Authors: Alicia García-Holgado and Francisco José García Peñalvo
https://youtu.be/e1etRHqIjCo
Track 14. 9th International Workshop on Software Engineering for E-learning (ISELEAR’18)
Authors: Joaquín Gayoso-Cabada, Mercedes Gómez-Albarrán and José-Luis Sierra
https://youtu.be/Um3MxZP79_s
Track 14. 9th International Workshop on Software Engineering for E-learning (ISELEAR’18)
Authors: Mary Sánchez-Gordón and Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
https://youtu.be/W6oAObExar8
Track 13. Uncertainty in Digital Humanities
Author: Amelie Dorn, Eveline Wandl-Vogt, Thomas Palfinger, Jose Luis Preza Diaz, Barbara Piringer, Alexander Schatek and Rainer Zoubek
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
1. Document Annotation Tools: Annotation
Classification Mechanisms
Joaquín Gayoso, Antonio Sarasa, José Luis Sierra
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Grupo ILSA
2. Documents annotation tools
• With these tools, students can associate annotations with fragments of
documents.
• They facilitate some activities of the learning process:
• Analysis of content.
• Develop the meta-reflective thinking.
• Collaborative annotation among students.
• Implement innovative interaction mechanisms.
3. Annotation Classification Mechanisms
• These tools provide mechanisms for classifying annotations which are
essential in order to :
• Retrieval of relevant annotations.
• Evaluate of work done by students.
• Promote the collaborative work in annotation communities.
• Help the students during annotation activities
4. Annotation Classification Mechanisms
• This paper presents a study about the mechanisms for classifying
annotations.
• Conditions:
• It is limited to tools oriented to the annotation of documents, where text is the
predominant medium.
• It was used recent surveys on the subject and free searches of primary scientific sources
(in particular, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, IEEE xplore, and Google Scholar).
• It was selected 38 annotation tools.
5. Annotation Classification Mechanisms
• As results, it was identified 5 main annotation classification strategies:
• Tools that lacked specific classification mechanisms.
• Classification based on presentational attributes.
• Classification based on predefined semantic categories.
• Classification based on the use of folksonomies
• Classification based on the use of ontologies.
6. Tools that lacked specific classification
mechanisms.
• In this approach, there is no specific mechanism for classifying annotations.
In this way, these tools prioritize other aspects, such as more natural
interaction mechanisms, rather than the classification of annotations.
• Tools: Digital Reading Desk , Livenotes, WriteOn, PaperCP or u-Annotate.
7. Classification based on presentational
attributes.
• In this approach, the tools use the different ways of annotating a document
(e. g., underlining or highlighting fragments of the text, adding comments,
etc.) that it is used in order to define an implicit categorization of the
annotations (i. e., underlining, highlighting, explicit text, etc.). These
categories use the presentational attributes of the annotations.
• Tools: Adobe Reader, PDF Annotator , Diigo , CASE tool, CON2ANNO ,
Anozilla annotation plug-in, Vpen ,IIAF
8. Classification based on predefined semantic
categories.
• The tools that follow this approach uses a set of semantic tags for
annotation classification. These tags are related to the semantics of
annotations and not to their presentation characteristics.
• Tools: eLAWS, Highlight, PAMS 2.0 , MyNote, Tafannote, WCRAS-
TQAFM, CRAS-RAID, MADCOW
9. Classification based on the use of folksonomies
• In this approach, for the classification of annotations it is used folksonomies
(tags created by the users).
• Tools: HyLighter, Hypothe.sis, A.nnotate, Note-taking, OATS,
SpreadCrumbs, Tsaap-Notes.
10. Classification based on the use of ontologies.
• In this approach, the tools can be used explicit ontologies that represent
different aspects of the annotation process. Students can use these
ontologies to make the semantics of annotations explicit by associating one
or more concepts taken from the ontologies to the notes.
• Tools: loomp, DLNotes , MemoNote, WebAnnot, and @note
11. Discussion
• The study should showed the actual
tendencies in this domain because we
did not prioritize one type of tool
over another (however for tools based
on ontologies, we did an exhaustive
search and we found no more tools)
5
10
9
8
6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
NONE ANNOTATION
MODES
PREDEFINED
SEMANTIC
CATEGORIES
FOLKSONOMIES ONTOLOGIES
numberoftools
Classification mechanism
Number of tools analyzed per annotation
classification method
12. Discussion
• The predominant tool type is the one based on annotation modes.
• The second most frequent type of tool is based on predefined sets of
semantic categories.
• Tools based on folksonomies are in third place.
• Finally, we have tools that do not include specific mechanisms for classifying
annotations and 6 tools that use mechanisms based on ontologies.
13. Educational point of view
• Tools lacking specific classification mechanisms or only enabling
presentational attributes are not very convenient from an educational point
of view:
• They imitate conventional pen and paper-based annotation mechanisms.
• It has a negative impact on learners.
• It is difficult to analyze the activities.
14. Educational point of view
• Tools supporting a set of predefined semantic categories for classification:
• It can use useful for students because they must reflect on the purpose of the
annotations in addition to deciding on the actual anchors and/or contents.
• They can offer meaningful criteria for retrieving annotations during the assessment of
the activities.
• The main limitation of the approach is the pre-defined character of these lists of
categories.
• They have the problem of lack of structure of simple lists.
15. Educational point of view
• Tools supporting folksonomies:
• They promote the reflection during the annotation process
• The main limitation is to delegate the collaborative design of these folksonomies to the
learners
• They have the problem of lack of structure of simple lists
16. Educational point of view
• Tools supporting ontologies:
• It is possible to capture specific knowledge about annotation.
• It provides a high degree of contextualization of the tool to each specific activity.
• The structural of ontologies solves the problem of lack of structure of simple lists
• The main limitation is the need of a background in computer science or knowledge
engineering.
17. Conclussions
• We have done an exploratory study of annotation classification mechanisms.
• It was analyzing 38 document annotation tools and we have found five basic
forms of classification.
• From the point of view of educational use, the tools that allow semantic
classification are more appropriate.
• We have found a high percentage of tools that do not pay attention to this
aspect of semantic classification, which can hinder their educational use.
18. Future work
• The study can be expanded by considering tools for the annotation of other
types of media (e.g., images or videos).
• The analysis can be useful when designing new annotation tools for
educational purposes.