SlideShare a Scribd company logo
April 9, 2015 | 1
High Duct Fired Gas Turbine Combined Heat & Power (DF‐GT‐CHP): 
a better steam raising system
Suresh Jambunathan, 
Director of Business Development, NA Sales
Larsen & Toubro Technology Services
Cell:  630‐335‐4544
E‐mail:  Suresh.Jambunathan@lnttechservices.com
April 9th, 2015
Location:   Hilton Houston North Convention Center 
Houston, TX
April 9, 2015 | 2
Learning Outcomes
Efficiency & flexibility automatically hedge against price & load volatility ‐ being green is good for your wallet and your conscience
Plan carefully for utilities when contemplating process plant new build or expansion
High Duct Fired Gas Turbine Combined Heat & Power (DF GT‐CHP) is a financially attractive, technically feasible and sustainable 
alternative to package boilers to an industrial site’s power & steam needs.
April 9, 2015 | 3
Who is Larsen & Toubro Technology Services (L&TTS)?
• A publicly owned $14.3 billion / 50,000+ employee global technology, 
engineering,  manufacturing and construction conglomerate
• Manufacturing facilities in Asia, Middle East and Australia 
• Products & services delivered in 40+ countries
• Global supply chain
• 75+ years & growing
L&T: India’s largest Engineering company – our parent group
L&T Technology Services ‐ a wholly owned subsidiary of L&T
Plant Engineering
Transportation
Industrial/Medical
Telecom/Hi‐Tech
• 175+ global customers
• 47+ Fortune 500 customers
• 157+ patents co‐authored
• 9,500+ employees dedicated to engineering services
• 6 ISO 9001:2008 & CMMI Level 5 certified delivery centers
April 9, 2015 | 4
Non‐traditional services, solutions & offerings
Energy Audit & Management (Plant Utility Management & 
Optimization Services (PUMOS)
Asset Information Management (AIM)
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) & Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
Internet of Things (IoT) & Machine to Machine (M2M) solutions
Data Analytics
Machine Design
Packaging Design
Industrial & Product Design
Application Development
LEED Certification Support
Procurement Management
Construction Management
Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
Plastics Engineering
Imagine it …… and we’ll help design‐build‐commission it
Customer Technology
Vendor Packages
FEED
Design, Project Management
Procurement SupportCore Template Build
Traditional Plant Engineering: Concept to completion
Plant Engineering services, solutions & offerings
April 9, 2015 | 5
Recent headlines reveal a rebirth of US manufacturing
April 9, 2015 | 6
“Trendy” processes hog headlines, but “dowdy” utilities are essential
UTILITIES
• Power
• Thermal Energy delivered as 
steam
hot water
thermal oil
refrigerant
• Compressed air
• Lighting
• Insulation
• Water – surface & sub‐surface
• Wastewater treatment: anaerobic & aerobic
ACME Chemical Co:
Boss:  We’re investing $$$$$$$ to build process XYZ
Assistant:  What about utilities?
Boss:  Just get it done
Assistant to Plant Manager:  Get it done
Plant Manager: 
Orders a new package boiler from “Bigger & Better Boiler” company 
Pays ungodly $$ to utility company to upgrade electrical substation 
Rule of Thumb: 
$$$Utilities are 10% to 40% of $$$Process
April 9, 2015 | 7
Combined Heat & Power (CHP) at University of 
Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Efficiency >80%
Traditional central power generation. 
Efficiency ~35%.... burning money up the stack
Uscommunityenergyguidehi.pdf    community energy: planning, development and delivery, IDFA pub.  
Michael king 2012
Energy efficiency vs. waste… the energy recycling advantage
April 9, 2015 | 8
Key utilities (power & steam): Two choices… one is arguably better
Package boiler
Nameplate rating:
125 Kpph
150 psig
ή ~83% LHV
FSF~ 1,360 Btu/lb
Natural gas
136 MMBtu/Hr
Steam @ 100 psig
Process 
steam 
load
Gas Turbine
HR: 12.2 
MMBtu/MWh
Steam 
700 psig / 700F 
Nat. Gas to GT 
50 MMBtu/Hr
HRSG*
Nameplate
125 Kpph
750 psig
750 F
STG rating 
4 MW
100 psig, 100 Kpph
Process 
steam 
load
ST power, 3.7 MW
GT power 4.0 MW
stack gas
Nat. gas to Duct Fire 
98 MMBtu/Hr
stack gas
Deaerator
60% condensate @ 180F
40% makeup @ 60F
BFW @ 5 psig / 225F
100 Kpph
Blow‐down. 
Deaerator
Blow‐down.
60% condensate @ 180F
40% makeup @ 60F
Package boiler system: safe & unimaginative
Steam: boiler
Power: grid supplied
High duct fired Gas Turbine Combined Heat & Power 
(DF GT‐CHP) :  safe, sustainable & profitable
Steam: from HRSG
Power: onsite generation; remote grid provides back‐up
STG: Steam Turbine Generator; HRSG:  Heat Recovery Steam Generator;  FSF: Fuel to Steam Factor
April 9, 2015 | 9
Key utilities (power & steam): A closer look favors efficient & high DF GT‐CHP
Design point results 
(100 Kpph / 100 psig)
Package boiler 
system
Duct fired GT‐
CHP system
Difference
Fuel required
MMBtu/Hr, LHV
136 148 12
Net onsite power, 
MW
n/a 7.7 7.7
Fuel‐to‐Steam Factor 
(FSF), MMBtu/Klb
1.36 1.46 0.10
CHP Heat Rate, LHV 
MMBtu/MWh
n/a 4.5 4.5
*Net operational cost 
of steam, $/Klb
$7.3 $4.9 ($2.4)
Fuel cost of power, 
$/MWh
n/a $22.3 $22.3
Generate inexpensive power for <= 10% extra fuel
Package boiler
Nameplate rating:
125 Kpph
150 psig
ή ~83% LHV
FSF~ 1,360 Btu/lb
Natural gas
136 MMBtu/Hr
Steam @ 100 psig
Process 
steam 
load
Gas Turbine
HR: 12.2 
MMBtu/MWh
Steam 
700 psig / 700F 
Nat. Gas to GT 
50 MMBtu/Hr
HRSG*
Nameplate
125 Kpph
750 psig
750 F
STG rating 
4 MW
100 psig, 100 Kpph
Process 
steam 
load
ST power, 3.7 MW
GT power 4.0 MW
stack gas
Nat. gas to Duct Fire 
98 MMBtu/Hr
stack gas
Deaerator
60% condensate @ 180F
40% makeup @ 60F
BFW @ 5 psig / 225F
100 Kpph
Blow‐down. 
Deaerator
Blow‐down.
60% condensate @ 180F
40% makeup @ 60F
* Net OpEx cost of steam reflects fuel cost, credit from onsite power and O&M costs of both systems
April 9, 2015 | 10
Package boiler efficiency varies with load; sizing & optimal design point?
40% load
Efficiency: 73% 
100% load
Efficiency: 83% 
April 9, 2015 | 11
DF GT CHP is a better alternative: Duct fire to efficiently & rapidly follow load
April 9, 2015 | 12
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
GT‐CHP Steam‐to‐Power Factor, SPF (Klb/MW)
Efficiency, %
Process steam load, Kpph
High duct firing GT‐CHP efficiency consistently exceeds boiler efficiency, %
Boiler efficiency, % GT CHP efficiency, % GT‐CHP Steam:Power Factor, SPF (Klb/MW)
ήDF GT CHP > ήboiler across the load curve. CHP Steam‐to‐Power Factor tracks load
April 9, 2015 | 13
Higher marginal efficiency of duct firing converges fuel burned per lb steam
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Total Fuel burned, MMBtu/Hr, LHV
Fuel‐to‐Steam Factor, FSF,  MMBtu/Klb 
Process steam load, Kpph
High duct firing converges Fuel‐to‐Steam factor (MMBtu/Klb) 
Boiler FSF MMBtu/Klb GT CHP FSF, MMBtu/Klb Boiler Fuel, MMBtu/hr GT‐CHP fuel, MMBtu/Hr
April 9, 2015 | 14
What about economics?  simplified assumptions
Process operations:  8,322 hrs/year
Process steam load:   40 to 100 Kpph @ 100 psig
Delivered natural gas:  $5/MMBtu, HHV
Delivered grid power:  6.5 ¢/KWh ($65/MWh)
Full load package boiler efficiency :  83% LHV
Gas Turbine heat rate (4.2 MW Centaur 50): 12,200 Btu/KWh, LHV
Feedwater to DeAerator 100F
Operations & Maintenance costs:
GT:  $10/MWh
Package boiler:  35 to 40 ¢/Klb
HRSG:  35 to 40 ¢/Klb
April 9, 2015 | 15
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
$8.0
$9.0
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Net Savings, $K/yr
Net Operational Cost of steam, $/Klb
Process steam load, Kpph
With DF‐CHP, reduced cost of process steam
Boiler: Net Cost of steam GT‐CHP: net cost of steam SAVINGS: GT‐CHP vs. Boiler
Significant and consistent savings with DF GT CHP
April 9, 2015 | 16
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 $9.0
Displaced Grid power, $/MWh
Delivered cost of gas, $/MMBtu, HHV
Operational NET ZERO for low (40 Kpph) & high (100 Kpph) steam load
100 Kpph 40 Kpph
Package boiler operationally 
profitable below the line
DF‐GT CHP operationally profitable 
above the line
Operational NET ZERO: What is your grid power and gas price?
April 9, 2015 | 17
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
$3.0 $3.5 $4.0 $4.5 $5.0 $5.5 $6.0 $6.5 $7.0
Incremental payback, years
Incremental investment, $MM 
Incremental Investment & Payback: "steaming savings" 
100 Kpph 40 Kpph
Short payback on incremental investment over package boiler systems
April 9, 2015 | 18
Additional DF GT‐CHP benefits compared to standard package boiler systems. 
Benefit to Grid
Local grid stability including power factor support and reduced I2R line loss
Balance variable power from wind and solar, thus speed renewable energy deployment
Defer or avoid investment in 
Remote central generation plants
Transmission & Distribution infrastructure
Benefit to the thermal host
Reduced cost of steam and increased steam supply reliability
More reliable power supply 
Benefit to society
Reduced pollution and lower greenhouse gas emissions
Efficiency equals “free fuel”
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/3‐ways‐
superstorm‐sandy‐could‐change‐utilities‐forever
The CHP advantage:  Lower 
Manhattan after super‐storm Sandy
April 9, 2015 | 19
Inertia and unfamiliarity
Standard compliance solutions seen as “tried and true”
Energy Policy Act, 2005
Hurts ability of regulated utilities to secure certain cost recovery for long‐term Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) with CHP plants.  
Makes CHP plant financing difficult
Air permit
MACT pollution control regulations allow retaining current air permit.  
CHP reduces pollution, yet requires a new permit 
Standby & exit charges
Imposed by some utilities before allowing CHP systems to interconnect with the grid. 
Upfront investment
Greater upfront CapEx required.
Hurdles facing natural gas fired GT‐CHP
Too many people expend too much effort to avoid the effort of thinking.  
Why mess with “tried & true”?
April 9, 2015 | 20
Project development: common sense and diligence
1. Set objectives & gather data
2. Conceptualize alternate configurations: Technical & economic appraisal
3. Project development
Technical:  Configuration, engineering, procurement, construction
Legal:  Structure of contracting entities (LLC, S or C Corp etc…)
Commercial:  Contracts for fuel, power, O&M, grants & incentives
Environmental:   Permits
Financial:  Financial models, equity & debt
Risks & Mitigants:  Project Execution Plan (PEP)
L&TTS can help improve your Plant Engineering investment decisions by aiding several elements of project 
development from concept (FEL1) to completion (FEL5). 
April 9, 2015 | 21
Questions?
Suresh Jambunathan, 
Director of Business Development, NA Sales
Larsen & Toubro Technology Services
Cell:  630‐335‐4544
E‐mail:  Suresh.Jambunathan@lnttechservices.com
April 9th, 2015
Location:   Hilton Houston North Convention Center 
Houston, TX
April 9, 2015 | 22

More Related Content

Similar to DF CHP Final 4-9-2015

The Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and Utilities
The Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and UtilitiesThe Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and Utilities
The Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and Utilities
Acquaint Softtech Private Limited
 
Capgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power Challenge
Capgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power ChallengeCapgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power Challenge
Capgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power Challenge
Capgemini
 
MANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed Resume
MANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed ResumeMANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed Resume
MANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed ResumeManikandan Sudalaimani
 
Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?
Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?
Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?
Havas People
 
Training & devlopment shreya gupta
Training & devlopment shreya guptaTraining & devlopment shreya gupta
Training & devlopment shreya gupta
Tarun Aggarwal
 
Tony Carter 2016 - Curriculum Vitae
Tony Carter 2016 - Curriculum VitaeTony Carter 2016 - Curriculum Vitae
Tony Carter 2016 - Curriculum VitaeTony Carter
 
Manikandan Energy Engineer
Manikandan Energy EngineerManikandan Energy Engineer
Manikandan Energy Engineer
Manikandan Sudalaimani
 
SMi Group's Meter Asset Management
SMi Group's Meter Asset ManagementSMi Group's Meter Asset Management
SMi Group's Meter Asset Management
Dale Butler
 
You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...
You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...
You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...
WorkforceNEXT
 
Leadership Exchange Houston Shared Presentations
Leadership Exchange Houston Shared PresentationsLeadership Exchange Houston Shared Presentations
Leadership Exchange Houston Shared Presentations
StephanieCaldwell9
 
Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...
Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...
Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...
accenture
 
Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...
Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...
Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...
WorkforceNEXT
 
CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017
CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017
CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017Craig Lee
 

Similar to DF CHP Final 4-9-2015 (20)

The Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and Utilities
The Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and UtilitiesThe Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and Utilities
The Benefits of IT Staff Augmentation for Energy and Utilities
 
atlasflyerr30
atlasflyerr30atlasflyerr30
atlasflyerr30
 
Capgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power Challenge
Capgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power ChallengeCapgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power Challenge
Capgemini Super Techies Show Season 3 - The Tata Power Challenge
 
MANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed Resume
MANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed ResumeMANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed Resume
MANIKANDAN_ENERGY ENGINEER_Detailed Resume
 
Resume Aich 240916
Resume Aich 240916Resume Aich 240916
Resume Aich 240916
 
mmCV0416
mmCV0416mmCV0416
mmCV0416
 
Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?
Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?
Is there really a talent shortage in the oil and gas industry?
 
Training & devlopment shreya gupta
Training & devlopment shreya guptaTraining & devlopment shreya gupta
Training & devlopment shreya gupta
 
Resume 2016
Resume 2016Resume 2016
Resume 2016
 
Tony Carter 2016 - Curriculum Vitae
Tony Carter 2016 - Curriculum VitaeTony Carter 2016 - Curriculum Vitae
Tony Carter 2016 - Curriculum Vitae
 
PREM SINGH
PREM SINGHPREM SINGH
PREM SINGH
 
Manikandan Energy Engineer
Manikandan Energy EngineerManikandan Energy Engineer
Manikandan Energy Engineer
 
ML-MT4572 - Safak (2)
ML-MT4572 - Safak (2)ML-MT4572 - Safak (2)
ML-MT4572 - Safak (2)
 
SMi Group's Meter Asset Management
SMi Group's Meter Asset ManagementSMi Group's Meter Asset Management
SMi Group's Meter Asset Management
 
You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...
You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...
You Say you Want a Revolution - How is HR Evolving in Today's Energy Marketpl...
 
Leadership Exchange Houston Shared Presentations
Leadership Exchange Houston Shared PresentationsLeadership Exchange Houston Shared Presentations
Leadership Exchange Houston Shared Presentations
 
Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...
Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...
Navigating the Crude Cycle: 10 Strategic Actions for oilfield service and equ...
 
Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...
Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...
Talent Acquisition: How has the Price of Oil Altered O&G Industry Recruitment...
 
CV ameer
CV ameerCV ameer
CV ameer
 
CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017
CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017
CAPABILITY STATEMENT LEE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 21-2-2017
 

More from Suresh Jambunathan

CHP and Industrial Applications-FINAL
CHP and Industrial Applications-FINALCHP and Industrial Applications-FINAL
CHP and Industrial Applications-FINALSuresh Jambunathan
 
Elec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINAL
Elec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINALElec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINAL
Elec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINALSuresh Jambunathan
 
Elec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINAL
Elec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINALElec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINAL
Elec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINALSuresh Jambunathan
 
15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ Final
15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ Final15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ Final
15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ FinalSuresh Jambunathan
 
16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINAL
16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINAL16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINAL
16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINALSuresh Jambunathan
 

More from Suresh Jambunathan (7)

USGBC2016 SJv1.0
USGBC2016 SJv1.0USGBC2016 SJv1.0
USGBC2016 SJv1.0
 
CHP and Industrial Applications-FINAL
CHP and Industrial Applications-FINALCHP and Industrial Applications-FINAL
CHP and Industrial Applications-FINAL
 
Elec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINAL
Elec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINALElec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINAL
Elec. Pwr Conf. DF-CHP 4-20-2016SJ FINAL
 
AIChE2016 Chicago FINAL
AIChE2016 Chicago FINALAIChE2016 Chicago FINAL
AIChE2016 Chicago FINAL
 
Elec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINAL
Elec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINALElec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINAL
Elec Pwr Conf Baltimore 2012 5-17-2012 SJ FINAL
 
15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ Final
15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ Final15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ Final
15th EPConf 5-14-2013 SJ Final
 
16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINAL
16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINAL16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINAL
16th Elec Pwr Conf. 4-3-2014 SJ FINAL
 

DF CHP Final 4-9-2015

  • 1. April 9, 2015 | 1 High Duct Fired Gas Turbine Combined Heat & Power (DF‐GT‐CHP):  a better steam raising system Suresh Jambunathan,  Director of Business Development, NA Sales Larsen & Toubro Technology Services Cell:  630‐335‐4544 E‐mail:  Suresh.Jambunathan@lnttechservices.com April 9th, 2015 Location:   Hilton Houston North Convention Center  Houston, TX
  • 2. April 9, 2015 | 2 Learning Outcomes Efficiency & flexibility automatically hedge against price & load volatility ‐ being green is good for your wallet and your conscience Plan carefully for utilities when contemplating process plant new build or expansion High Duct Fired Gas Turbine Combined Heat & Power (DF GT‐CHP) is a financially attractive, technically feasible and sustainable  alternative to package boilers to an industrial site’s power & steam needs.
  • 3. April 9, 2015 | 3 Who is Larsen & Toubro Technology Services (L&TTS)? • A publicly owned $14.3 billion / 50,000+ employee global technology,  engineering,  manufacturing and construction conglomerate • Manufacturing facilities in Asia, Middle East and Australia  • Products & services delivered in 40+ countries • Global supply chain • 75+ years & growing L&T: India’s largest Engineering company – our parent group L&T Technology Services ‐ a wholly owned subsidiary of L&T Plant Engineering Transportation Industrial/Medical Telecom/Hi‐Tech • 175+ global customers • 47+ Fortune 500 customers • 157+ patents co‐authored • 9,500+ employees dedicated to engineering services • 6 ISO 9001:2008 & CMMI Level 5 certified delivery centers
  • 4. April 9, 2015 | 4 Non‐traditional services, solutions & offerings Energy Audit & Management (Plant Utility Management &  Optimization Services (PUMOS) Asset Information Management (AIM) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) & Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Internet of Things (IoT) & Machine to Machine (M2M) solutions Data Analytics Machine Design Packaging Design Industrial & Product Design Application Development LEED Certification Support Procurement Management Construction Management Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Plastics Engineering Imagine it …… and we’ll help design‐build‐commission it Customer Technology Vendor Packages FEED Design, Project Management Procurement SupportCore Template Build Traditional Plant Engineering: Concept to completion Plant Engineering services, solutions & offerings
  • 5. April 9, 2015 | 5 Recent headlines reveal a rebirth of US manufacturing
  • 6. April 9, 2015 | 6 “Trendy” processes hog headlines, but “dowdy” utilities are essential UTILITIES • Power • Thermal Energy delivered as  steam hot water thermal oil refrigerant • Compressed air • Lighting • Insulation • Water – surface & sub‐surface • Wastewater treatment: anaerobic & aerobic ACME Chemical Co: Boss:  We’re investing $$$$$$$ to build process XYZ Assistant:  What about utilities? Boss:  Just get it done Assistant to Plant Manager:  Get it done Plant Manager:  Orders a new package boiler from “Bigger & Better Boiler” company  Pays ungodly $$ to utility company to upgrade electrical substation  Rule of Thumb:  $$$Utilities are 10% to 40% of $$$Process
  • 7. April 9, 2015 | 7 Combined Heat & Power (CHP) at University of  Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. Efficiency >80% Traditional central power generation.  Efficiency ~35%.... burning money up the stack Uscommunityenergyguidehi.pdf    community energy: planning, development and delivery, IDFA pub.   Michael king 2012 Energy efficiency vs. waste… the energy recycling advantage
  • 8. April 9, 2015 | 8 Key utilities (power & steam): Two choices… one is arguably better Package boiler Nameplate rating: 125 Kpph 150 psig ή ~83% LHV FSF~ 1,360 Btu/lb Natural gas 136 MMBtu/Hr Steam @ 100 psig Process  steam  load Gas Turbine HR: 12.2  MMBtu/MWh Steam  700 psig / 700F  Nat. Gas to GT  50 MMBtu/Hr HRSG* Nameplate 125 Kpph 750 psig 750 F STG rating  4 MW 100 psig, 100 Kpph Process  steam  load ST power, 3.7 MW GT power 4.0 MW stack gas Nat. gas to Duct Fire  98 MMBtu/Hr stack gas Deaerator 60% condensate @ 180F 40% makeup @ 60F BFW @ 5 psig / 225F 100 Kpph Blow‐down.  Deaerator Blow‐down. 60% condensate @ 180F 40% makeup @ 60F Package boiler system: safe & unimaginative Steam: boiler Power: grid supplied High duct fired Gas Turbine Combined Heat & Power  (DF GT‐CHP) :  safe, sustainable & profitable Steam: from HRSG Power: onsite generation; remote grid provides back‐up STG: Steam Turbine Generator; HRSG:  Heat Recovery Steam Generator;  FSF: Fuel to Steam Factor
  • 9. April 9, 2015 | 9 Key utilities (power & steam): A closer look favors efficient & high DF GT‐CHP Design point results  (100 Kpph / 100 psig) Package boiler  system Duct fired GT‐ CHP system Difference Fuel required MMBtu/Hr, LHV 136 148 12 Net onsite power,  MW n/a 7.7 7.7 Fuel‐to‐Steam Factor  (FSF), MMBtu/Klb 1.36 1.46 0.10 CHP Heat Rate, LHV  MMBtu/MWh n/a 4.5 4.5 *Net operational cost  of steam, $/Klb $7.3 $4.9 ($2.4) Fuel cost of power,  $/MWh n/a $22.3 $22.3 Generate inexpensive power for <= 10% extra fuel Package boiler Nameplate rating: 125 Kpph 150 psig ή ~83% LHV FSF~ 1,360 Btu/lb Natural gas 136 MMBtu/Hr Steam @ 100 psig Process  steam  load Gas Turbine HR: 12.2  MMBtu/MWh Steam  700 psig / 700F  Nat. Gas to GT  50 MMBtu/Hr HRSG* Nameplate 125 Kpph 750 psig 750 F STG rating  4 MW 100 psig, 100 Kpph Process  steam  load ST power, 3.7 MW GT power 4.0 MW stack gas Nat. gas to Duct Fire  98 MMBtu/Hr stack gas Deaerator 60% condensate @ 180F 40% makeup @ 60F BFW @ 5 psig / 225F 100 Kpph Blow‐down.  Deaerator Blow‐down. 60% condensate @ 180F 40% makeup @ 60F * Net OpEx cost of steam reflects fuel cost, credit from onsite power and O&M costs of both systems
  • 10. April 9, 2015 | 10 Package boiler efficiency varies with load; sizing & optimal design point? 40% load Efficiency: 73%  100% load Efficiency: 83% 
  • 11. April 9, 2015 | 11 DF GT CHP is a better alternative: Duct fire to efficiently & rapidly follow load
  • 12. April 9, 2015 | 12 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 GT‐CHP Steam‐to‐Power Factor, SPF (Klb/MW) Efficiency, % Process steam load, Kpph High duct firing GT‐CHP efficiency consistently exceeds boiler efficiency, % Boiler efficiency, % GT CHP efficiency, % GT‐CHP Steam:Power Factor, SPF (Klb/MW) ήDF GT CHP > ήboiler across the load curve. CHP Steam‐to‐Power Factor tracks load
  • 13. April 9, 2015 | 13 Higher marginal efficiency of duct firing converges fuel burned per lb steam 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Total Fuel burned, MMBtu/Hr, LHV Fuel‐to‐Steam Factor, FSF,  MMBtu/Klb  Process steam load, Kpph High duct firing converges Fuel‐to‐Steam factor (MMBtu/Klb)  Boiler FSF MMBtu/Klb GT CHP FSF, MMBtu/Klb Boiler Fuel, MMBtu/hr GT‐CHP fuel, MMBtu/Hr
  • 14. April 9, 2015 | 14 What about economics?  simplified assumptions Process operations:  8,322 hrs/year Process steam load:   40 to 100 Kpph @ 100 psig Delivered natural gas:  $5/MMBtu, HHV Delivered grid power:  6.5 ¢/KWh ($65/MWh) Full load package boiler efficiency :  83% LHV Gas Turbine heat rate (4.2 MW Centaur 50): 12,200 Btu/KWh, LHV Feedwater to DeAerator 100F Operations & Maintenance costs: GT:  $10/MWh Package boiler:  35 to 40 ¢/Klb HRSG:  35 to 40 ¢/Klb
  • 15. April 9, 2015 | 15 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 $9.0 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Net Savings, $K/yr Net Operational Cost of steam, $/Klb Process steam load, Kpph With DF‐CHP, reduced cost of process steam Boiler: Net Cost of steam GT‐CHP: net cost of steam SAVINGS: GT‐CHP vs. Boiler Significant and consistent savings with DF GT CHP
  • 16. April 9, 2015 | 16 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 $9.0 Displaced Grid power, $/MWh Delivered cost of gas, $/MMBtu, HHV Operational NET ZERO for low (40 Kpph) & high (100 Kpph) steam load 100 Kpph 40 Kpph Package boiler operationally  profitable below the line DF‐GT CHP operationally profitable  above the line Operational NET ZERO: What is your grid power and gas price?
  • 17. April 9, 2015 | 17 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 $4.5 $5.0 $5.5 $6.0 $6.5 $7.0 Incremental payback, years Incremental investment, $MM  Incremental Investment & Payback: "steaming savings"  100 Kpph 40 Kpph Short payback on incremental investment over package boiler systems
  • 18. April 9, 2015 | 18 Additional DF GT‐CHP benefits compared to standard package boiler systems.  Benefit to Grid Local grid stability including power factor support and reduced I2R line loss Balance variable power from wind and solar, thus speed renewable energy deployment Defer or avoid investment in  Remote central generation plants Transmission & Distribution infrastructure Benefit to the thermal host Reduced cost of steam and increased steam supply reliability More reliable power supply  Benefit to society Reduced pollution and lower greenhouse gas emissions Efficiency equals “free fuel” http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/3‐ways‐ superstorm‐sandy‐could‐change‐utilities‐forever The CHP advantage:  Lower  Manhattan after super‐storm Sandy
  • 19. April 9, 2015 | 19 Inertia and unfamiliarity Standard compliance solutions seen as “tried and true” Energy Policy Act, 2005 Hurts ability of regulated utilities to secure certain cost recovery for long‐term Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) with CHP plants.   Makes CHP plant financing difficult Air permit MACT pollution control regulations allow retaining current air permit.   CHP reduces pollution, yet requires a new permit  Standby & exit charges Imposed by some utilities before allowing CHP systems to interconnect with the grid.  Upfront investment Greater upfront CapEx required. Hurdles facing natural gas fired GT‐CHP Too many people expend too much effort to avoid the effort of thinking.   Why mess with “tried & true”?
  • 20. April 9, 2015 | 20 Project development: common sense and diligence 1. Set objectives & gather data 2. Conceptualize alternate configurations: Technical & economic appraisal 3. Project development Technical:  Configuration, engineering, procurement, construction Legal:  Structure of contracting entities (LLC, S or C Corp etc…) Commercial:  Contracts for fuel, power, O&M, grants & incentives Environmental:   Permits Financial:  Financial models, equity & debt Risks & Mitigants:  Project Execution Plan (PEP) L&TTS can help improve your Plant Engineering investment decisions by aiding several elements of project  development from concept (FEL1) to completion (FEL5). 
  • 21. April 9, 2015 | 21 Questions? Suresh Jambunathan,  Director of Business Development, NA Sales Larsen & Toubro Technology Services Cell:  630‐335‐4544 E‐mail:  Suresh.Jambunathan@lnttechservices.com April 9th, 2015 Location:   Hilton Houston North Convention Center  Houston, TX