This document discusses several research articles and studies related to wound infection identification, prevention, and treatment. Key points include: - The importance of educating all healthcare practitioners on wound infection symptoms, signs, and treatment options. - A study showing the WIRE tool can help identify bacterial presence and clinical manifestations of wound infection earlier. - A study finding gaps in practitioner knowledge of wound infection that need to be addressed through continued education. - Considerations for managing severe non-healing wounds and preventing infection through proper cleaning and use of antimicrobial dressings. - The development of an evidence-based, multidisciplinary guideline for treating both chronic and acute wound infections. - How a prescribing pyramid model can help

1. Development of Evidence-Based Practice Change Proposal
Development of Evidence-Based Practice Change ProposalRutter, L. (2018). Identifying and
managing wound infection in the community. British journal of community
nursing, 23(Sup3), S6-S14.It was concluded in this article that all health practitioners
should be educated to guarantee that they are informed of the wound infection symptoms
and signs, be aware of the antiseptic dressings accessible to them, and understand when to
raise their concerns. Strength of this report is that the study was applicable and highlights
the significance of empowering nurses to do further work on wound infection prevention.
The drawback is that it does not provide options to offer workers the proposed education,
mainly in the community environment Development of Evidence-Based Practice Change
Proposal .ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERESiaw-Sakyi, V. (2017). Early wound
infection identification using the WIRE tool in community health care settings: An audit
report. British Journal of Community Nursing, 22(Sup12), S20-S27.The usage of the WIRE
tool in community healthcare environments was addressed in this article. The audit results
showed a positive association between the WIRE tool and a high presence of bacterial.
While it does not automatically imply that the wound is infected, recognizing the clinical
manifestations sooner enough and starting management will limit the risk of infection and
the related problems. The strength of the article is that this hypothesis is supported by
proof. The weakness is that it requires further analysis and better information from a larger
size of the research.Hughes, M. A. (2016). Wound infection: a knowledge deficit that needs
addressing. British Journal of Nursing, 25(6), S46-S51.This article involves a study
conducted to determine the comprehension of the delegates about wound infection and
their care alternatives. The findings of the review highlighted the significance of continuing
education on main facets of wound infection, such as identifying essential colonization and
localized infection, care methods, best practices for the usage of antimicrobial dressings,
and wound cleaning solutions. Strength is that the research confirms this hypothesis which
is a perfect instructional subject to concentrate on for practice change. The downside is that
further research to evaluate clear substitution and order forms to enforce such training and
render it compulsory will be helpful Development of Evidence-Based Practice Change
Proposal .Waird, A. (2018). Wound infection: A brief overview of the latest evidence-based
practice. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 26(3), 38.The article addresses
considerations which should be addressed by physicians and nurses when handling severe
non-healing wounds. The issues addressed include infection described as the most common
impediment to wound healing, biofilm-related problems, and research demonstrating that

2. antibiotic povidone-iodine is successful in restricting the development of biofilms in
wounds. It also addresses the stages of infection of wounds. The strength of the article is
that it is useful information to use when attempting to enact a change in the prevention
of wound infection. Its weakness is that it is targeted at a big university hospital.Zakhary, S.
A., Davey, C., Bari, R., Bean, J., Reber, T., Gallagher, K., ... & Napier, K. (2017). The
Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary, Evidence-based Wound
Infection Prevention and Treatment Guideline. Ostomy/wound Management, 63(11), 18-
29.This article addressed chronic and acute wound infections causing clinical, budgetary,
and patient-centred problems better tackled by multidisciplinary wound care teams
delivering reliable, credible, scientifically applicable, efficient, evidence-based management
in all contexts. The strength of the article is that for personal practice, it's a perfect idea to
put in consideration. The weakness is knowledge was not guided in the context of my
expected change in practice for improved awareness or practice change.ORDER A
PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREReynolds, V. (2013). Using the prescribing pyramid in
managing wound infections: part 2. Nurse Prescribing, 11(6), 284-290.The article
addressed how a prescribing pyramid should be employed to treat wound infections.
Wound infection is not only detrimental to the NHS; it may also have a huge effect on the
wellbeing of patients. This review discusses the usage of the NPC's (1999) seven rules that
recommend pyramid when prescribing for a wound infection. Strength in that it gives useful
information into how the prescribing pyramid should be utilized by Patients to avoid
wound infection better. Weakness is that certain organizations are not often efficient in
quality Development of Evidence-Based Practice Change Proposal.