The document describes a virtual reality exercise where participants envision the year 2100. Participants create, amplify, or destroy "urban objects" and design their own neighborhood for 100 inhabitants. They give their neighborhood an adjective, value, and group of inhabitants. Neighborhoods are combined into a city called Tamara. Participants also receive an envelope challenging them to further develop their neighborhood. The purpose is to have visual conversations that question assumptions, make the impossible seem possible, explore radical solutions, and include marginal voices in envisioning future cities.
8. INTRODUCE YOURSELF TO YOUR NEIGHBOURS.
WHAT ISYOUR NAME,AGE, CITY OF ORIGIN,AND JOB?
WHAT ARE YOUR URBAN OBJECTS TO
CREATE/AMPLIFY/DESTROY?
(PUT YOUR CARDS ON THE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN)
Time: 5 minutes
2
9. 3
DESIGN YOUR NEIGHBOURHOOD. ABOUT 100 PEOPLE WILL
LIVE IN IT.
MAKE SUREYOU USE ALL OFTHE URBAN OBJECTSYOU
CREATED,THOSEYOU WANTTO AMPLIFY,
AND NONE OFTHE ONESYOU WANTTO DESTROY.
Time: 20 min
10. 4
USE THE FORM TO FIND AN ADJECTIVE, A VALUE, AND A
GROUP OF INHABITANTS FOR YOUR NEIGHBOURHOOD.
THEN, CREATE THE MICRO-MANIFESTO
Time: 5 min
12. 5
LET’S GET THE NEIGHBOURHOODS
TOGETHER AND CREATE THE CITY OF TAMARA!
13. 6
BUT A CITY IS NOT JUST AN ARCHIPELAGO OF
NEIGHBOURHOODS.
HAVE A LOOK AT YOUR GOLDEN ENVELOPE AND EMBRACE
THE CHALLENGE! (ONE ENVELOPE EACH NEIGHBOURHOOD)
PLEASE, ONE PERSON PER GROUP AT ATIMETO WORK ONTHE
MAP
Time: 20 min
20. “Your gaze scans the streets as if they were
written pages: the city says everything you must
think, makes you repeat her discourse, and while
you believe you are visiting Tamara, you are
only recording the manes with which she defines
herself and her parts”
(Italo Calvino, Invisible Cities. 1972)
23. Nick Dunn, Paul Cureton,
Serena Pollastri (2014)
“A Visual History of the
Future”
UK Government Office for
Science
24. What would be ways of building visions and
scenarios of urban futures that articulate
the plurality, differences, and conflicts that
characterise the city, rather than being
based on consensus and internal coherence?
25. What would be ways of building visions and
scenarios of urban futures that articulate
the plurality, differences, and conflicts that
characterise the city, rather than being
based on consensus and internal coherence? Utopie,
1968-197X
26. What would be ways of building visions and
scenarios of urban futures that articulate
the plurality, differences, and conflicts that
characterise the city, rather than being
based on consensus and internal coherence? Datapolis (ODI)
2016
27. VISUAL CONVERSATIONS ON URBAN FUTURES
Processes and artefacts that utilise visual
language to enable or document voices
imagining and debating possible futures for
life in the city
28. VISUAL CONVERSATIONS ON URBAN FUTURES
Processes and artefacts that utilise visual
language to enable or document voices
imagining and debating possible futures for
life in the city
An Atlas of
Future Imaginary Cities
29. VISUAL CONVERSATIONS ON URBAN FUTURES
Processes and artefacts that utilise visual
language to enable or document voices
imagining and debating possible futures for
life in the city
An Atlas of
Future Imaginary Cities
30. VISUAL CONVERSATIONS ON URBAN FUTURES
question assumptions
“make possible what appears to be
impossible” (Lefebvre)
explore truly radical solutions
bring marginal voices to the conversation.