This document summarizes the results of a design process workshop to redesign bicycle stands. The workshop involved analyzing how people currently use bicycle stands, identifying requirements through surveys and scenarios, ideating new design concepts, and evaluating the concepts. Key findings include that stands currently lack shade, people prefer parking in shade, and stands are not always conveniently located or easy to use. Two conceptual designs were created - a collapsible shelter concept and a sliding rail concept. The concepts were evaluated against requirements of usability, security, and environmental factors. The sliding rail concept scored higher based on the requirements matrix.

1. Design Process WorkshopRedesigning Bicycle StandBy Y9 Sathish Shekar Neel Shah Mukund Mundhada Abhitosh Ghongade

2. Usability AnalysisPeople prefer to park cycles in sun- shade as cycle stand doesn’t have it In absence of cycle stands the cycles are parked randomly anywhere in the sun shade Parking in hurry Usability AnalysisEven though the cycle stand is therepeople avoid to use it Cycles are usually parked along thepathways

3. Usability AnalysisNatural tendency to park in Zig-Zag patternEmpty cycle stand in sunshine

4. USER SURVEY Cycle stands don't have shelters

5. People park behind our parked cycles

6. At peak hours it is difficulty to find a slot

7. No self positioning

8. When crowded it is difficult to lock the front wheel with stand, doesn't solve the purposeSometime cycle tire gets stuck in the stand

9. Handle bar gets entangled with other cycle

10. Stand is not inviting

11. Doesn’t find it necessary to park the cycle in the cycle stand Stand is far away from the destination

12. Makes scratches on the rim of wheel

13. Try to neglect when in hurry

14. In hostel stands at rear are not effectively used

15. Don’t have any problem using the product

16. It is difficult to locate after parking the cycle

17. Cycle with double stand creates a problem