Deep fake video detection using machine learning. Shakas Technologies ( Galaxy of Knowledge) #11/A 2nd East Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vellore - 632006. Mobile : +91-9500218218 / 8220150373| land line- 0416- 3552723 Shakas Training & Development | Shakas Sales & Services | Shakas Educational Trust|IEEE projects | Research & Development | Journal Publication | Email : info@shakastech.com | shakastech@gmail.com | website: www.shakastech.com​ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Shakas-Technologies

1. Base paper Title: Deep fake video detection using machine learning
Modified Title: Detecting deepfake videos with machine learning
Abstract
The proliferation of deepfake videos poses a significant challenge in maintaining the
integrity and trustworthiness of multimedia content on digital platforms. Detecting these
manipulated videos has become imperative to mitigate potential risks associated with
misinformation and deceptive content. This paper presents a comprehensive review and
analysis of machine learning-based approaches employed in the detection of deepfake
videos.The study explores various machine learning techniques, including but not limited to
convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), generative
adversarial networks (GANs), and ensemble methods, utilized in the identification and
classification of deepfake content. The advantages and limitations of these methodologies are
scrutinized in detail, encompassing aspects such as scalability, adaptability, feature extraction
capabilities, and computational efficiency.Key challenges, such as adversarial attacks, data
bias, and interpretability issues, are highlighted alongside potential strategies to mitigate
these concerns. The paper also addresses ethical considerations surrounding privacy
infringement and false positives in detection.Furthermore, this review emphasizes the
necessity for diversified and extensive datasets, benchmarking standards, and ongoing model
refinement to enhance the robustness and generalization capabilities of machine learning
models for deepfake detection. It advocates for interdisciplinary collaborations and continual
research efforts to develop more reliable, efficient, and ethically sound solutions in
combating the proliferation of deepfake videos across digital platforms.The insights gathered
from this review aim to contribute to the advancement of techniques for identifying and
mitigating the detrimental impact of deepfake videos, thereby fostering a more secure and
trustworthy digital environment.
Existing System
The notable advances in artificial neural network (ANN) based technologies play an
essential role in tampering with multimedia content. For example, AI-enabled software tools
like FaceApp, and FakeApp have been used for realistic-looking face swapping in images and
videos. This swapping mechanism allows anyone to alter the front look, hairstyle, gender, age,
and other personal attributes. The propagation of these fake videos causes many anxieties and
has become famous under the hood, Deepfake. The term ‘‘Deepfake’’ is derived from ‘‘Deep

2. Learning (DL)’’ and ‘‘Fake,’’ and it describes specific photo-realistic video or image contents
created with DL’s support. This word was named after an anonymous Reddit user in late 2017,
who applied deep learning methods for replacing a person’s face in pornographic videos using
another person’s face and created photo-realistic fake videos. To generate such counterfeit
videos, two neural networks: (i) a generative network and (ii) a discriminative network with a
Face Swap technique were used. The generative network creates fake images using an encoder
and a decoder. The dis criminative network defines the authenticity of the newly generated
images. The combination of these two networks is called Generative Adversarial Networks
(GANs), proposed by Ian Goodfellow.
Drawback in Existing System
 Adversarial Attacks: Deepfake creators actively work to bypass detection systems.
Machine learning models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks where slight
modifications to a deepfake can evade detection.
 Generalization Issues: Models trained on specific types of deepfakes might struggle
to generalize to unseen or new variations of manipulated content. This lack of
generalization can limit their effectiveness in real-world scenarios where deepfakes
continuously evolve.
 Data Bias: Training data for machine learning models might not adequately represent
the diversity of deepfakes that exist in the real world. Biased datasets can result in
models that perform well on specific types of deepfakes but poorly on others.
 Resource Intensive: Developing and training robust machine learning models for
deepfake detection often requires significant computational resources and large
amounts of high-quality labeled data, which might not be readily available.
Proposed System
Data Collection and Preprocessing:
 Gather a diverse dataset comprising both real and deepfake videos across various
contexts and quality levels.
Preprocess the videos to standardize formats, resolutions, and lengths for model
training.
Feature Extraction:

3.  Utilize deep learning architectures such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or
recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to extract relevant features from frames or
sequences of frames within videos.
 Employ techniques like optical flow analysis, frame-level analysis, or spatiotemporal
features extraction to capture discrepancies between authentic and manipulated
videos.
Model Training:
 Develop and train machine learning models using the extracted features to distinguish
between genuine and deepfake videos.
 Consider using diverse architectures, ensemble methods, or attention mechanisms to
enhance model performance and robustness.
Validation and Evaluation:
 Validate the trained models using a separate dataset, employing standard evaluation
metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.
 Perform cross-validation and assess model generalization to ensure effectiveness
across various types of deepfake manipulations.
Algorithm
 Use a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract features from the
frames (e.g., VGG, ResNet).
 Train a machine learning model (e.g., CNN, recurrent neural network, or hybrid
models) using the extracted features and labels (real vs. deepfake).
 Implement adversarial training techniques to enhance the model's resilience against
adversarial attacks.
Advantages
 Automation and Efficiency: Machine learning models can automate the process of
detecting deepfake videos, allowing for quicker analysis of a large volume of content
that would be impractical for humans to review manually.
 Scalability: Once trained, machine learning models can be scaled easily to process a
vast number of videos, making them suitable for platforms that deal with massive
amounts of user-generated content.
 Adaptability and Learning: Machine learning models can be continuously trained and
improved upon. They can adapt to new types of deepfake techniques as they emerge,
enhancing their ability to detect increasingly sophisticated manipulations.
 Feature Extraction: These models can automatically learn and extract complex
features from videos that may be imperceptible to the human eye, enabling them to
identify subtle inconsistencies or artifacts indicative of deepfake manipulation.

4. Software Specification
 Processor : I3 core processor
 Ram : 4 GB
 Hard disk : 500 GB
Software Specification
 Operating System : Windows 10 /11
 Frond End : Python
 Back End : Mysql Server
 IDE Tools : Pycharm